← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

It appears from the minister responsible major charges are coming at the Fair Trading Commission (FTC). The changes coincide with the expired 3-year contract of CEO Dr. Marsha Atherley-Ikechi. It is fair to say under her tenure the FTC’s role significantly diminished – mainly as a result of its lack of success to close the Barbados Light and Power rate hearing matter which has been ongoing for close to 4 years. The FTC as the watchdog agency charged to protect consumers and enforce utility regulations in Barbados has struggled to enforce its mandate in the opinion of the blogmaster.

A few of the changes announced recently by Minister Lisa Cummins in parliament piqued the interest of BU.

Leadership Transition

Brian Reece

The appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer, attorney Brian Reece will assume office on April 1. Minister Cummins was heard in parliament boasting of his unique qualifications and skillset.Her boast was not dissimilar to when Dr Jens Thraenhart was appointed as CEO of the BTMI in 2021 and abruptly had his contract terminated. We wish Brian Reece every success.

Structural Expansion

The FTC will undergo a structural change to enhance its oversight functions i.e. hiring additional personnel and increasing financial resources to ensure effective enforcement of regulation. Repeated feedback from the FTC is that is has been understaffed, limiting its ability to respond efficiently to consumer complaints and industry developments. Although good news that the HR will be boosted, one may question why the FTC received priority above the Auditor General’s Office?

Enhanced Collaboration with Regulatory Bodies

Too many words were used to describe how the proposed changes at the FTC intend to improve cross collaboration with stakeholders. Of interest to the blogmaster is how the proposed changes are meant to improve Barbados transition to a renewable energy sector (RE). After much fanfare in the last decade, RE penetration has screeched to a halt mainly due to the lack of battery storage capacity. The inability to implement has meant consumers, as usual, have been ‘shafted’ by not benefitting from energy savings and the concomitant negative effect to the cost of living in Barbados. This is where material benefit can be accrued for the consumer instead of the usual old chatter about markups on imported goods.

Conclusion

The proposed reform for the FTC is welcomed and the blogmaster extends best wishes on a successful implementation. There is little doubt the FTC and other regulators for that matter have been ineffective delivering value to its constituents in Barbados. The FTC has permitted the various actors in the Barbados space to collude on pricing therefore compromising its mandate to effectively manage fair competition in the market place.

As usual there is the rhetorical, who is the biggest loser?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

24 responses to “Shakeup!”


  1. This went South quickly.

    Co-op Energy to pay $16 million investment to facilitate stalled sugar industry transition
    By Sheria Brathwaite

    Mere weeks into the 2025 sugarcane harvest, uncertainty prevails over the true ownership of Barbados’ sugar industry, Barbados TODAY can reveal exclusively.
    Co-op Energy insisted that the government still controls the industry but the government maintained that Co-op Energy is in charge—despite failing to meet its end of the divestment bargain.
    According to Lieutenant Colonel Trevor Browne, head of the Barbados Sustainable Energy Co-operative Society Limited (Co-op Energy), the transition of the sugar industry from the state-owned Barbados Agricultural Management Corporation (BAMC) to Co-op Energy remains incomplete, despite earlier claims suggesting otherwise.
    “The BAMC is still running it. They haven’t handed it over to us,” Lt. Col. Browne told Barbados TODAY on Tuesday, stating that Co-op Energy had received no formal communication from the government about the transfer of assets.
    “We’ve asked them and written to them. They haven’t even responded yet. And I don’t have any army that can go in and take it over.”
    Lt. Col. Browne stressed that the handover had been stalled due to unresolved government-related issues.
    “We were in the process of it, but the government never completed it. They never handed it over to us,” he said, describing the situation as “in abeyance.”
    Challenging public statements that the handover had been finalised, Lt. Col. Browne questioned: “You should ask the minister when they plan to hand operations over to us . . . .Where in the budget did they explain the handover?”
    In a Members’ General Update published on January 8, Co-op Energy detailed the roadblocks preventing the transition.
    “The excellent progress that was initially made in the transfer of BAMC control . . . stalled when the government failed to produce independently verified valuations of the assets and liabilities to be transferred,” the update read.
    “Co-op Energy has closely followed the steps outlined in both the initial Memorandum of Understanding as well as the shareholders’ agreement that was crafted by the government.
    The only outstanding matter now is for an independently verified statement of the assets and liabilities being transferred, to be provided by BAMC, and then for Co-op Energy to make the required share contributions.”
    Minister of Agriculture Indar Weir firmly stated that the government will not transfer sugar industry assets to Co-op Energy until it fulfils its financial obligations.
    “Co-op Energy at this point in time has not yet put in its funds, and therefore we cannot transfer the government assets to Co-op Energy until they have put in their funds,” Weir declared.
    The breakdown in communication is another source of contention. Browne maintains that the government has ignored Co-op Energy’s repeated requests for clarification.
    “We have sent off not only one from last year but at least three letters between BAMC and the minister, and none of them have responded to any,” he said.
    But in a response late Tuesday, Weir refuted this claim, insisting that the government had met all its obligations.
    “All we’re waiting for is for Co-op Energy to put in their investment,” he told Barbados TODAY. “But we have kept our end of the arrangement—that is to provide them with financial information, an MOU, and a shareholders’ agreement that they have signed on to.”
    When pressed on whether Co-op Energy had been given a deadline, Weir confirmed that the company had signed the shareholders’ agreement before December 2023 and was expected to make its financial contribution at that time.
    Instead, he said, the company repeatedly sought and was granted extensions. “They asked for time and they were given time. They asked for time again and they were given time again. Then they came down and asked for financial information, and they were given financial information.”
    Asked if the time given to Co-op Energy was sufficient, Weir was unequivocal: “More than enough. So, whatever is happening right now is on their end. The onus is on Co-op Energy to put in their investment. But I’m not transferring government assets to anybody until they put in their investment.”
    Weir revealed that Co-op Energy was required to invest approximately $16 million, with an initial $4 million payment.
    To date, no payment has been made. “The total amount is somewhere around $16 million. To start with, we’ve asked them to put in about $4 million. They have not done so up to now.”
    Despite the stalled financial commitment, Weir insisted that the industry continues to function: “The process is not stalled from our end because all government assets are currently being used by the two companies that were formed. Portvale Factory is being used to produce sugar and molasses under the new company. All the cane fields with the canes are being used under the new company ABC to produce canes for Portvale Factory.”
    He further clarified that while the two private companies— Barbados Energy and Sugar Company (BESCO) Ltd and Agricultural Business Company (ABC) Ltd—are managing the industry, they do not yet own the assets as yet.
    He said: “They are companies. They are private companies. It’s just that they don’t own the assets at this point in time, but they are running the industry.”
    In contrast, a press release issued by Co-op Energy on March 24, 2024 stated that the transition process had been completed. The release announced the division of BAMC into two separate entities—ABC Ltd, which oversees more than 4 500 acres of farmland, and BESCO Ltd, which manages the island’s only operable sugar factory, Portvale, in Blowers, St James. The release also confirmed that Co-op Energy holds a 55 per cent equity stake in both companies.
    “On December 19, 2023, The Barbados Sustainable Energy Cooperative Society Ltd (Co-op Energy Barbados) took control of the operations of those sectors of the local sugar industry which were previously under the management of the Barbados Agricultural Management Company (BAMC) through our two new companies, ABC Ltd and BESCO Ltd . . . . Sugar operations under ABC and BESCO’s control and management commenced on January 15, 2024,” the statement said.
    As the impasse continues, Lt Col. Browne urged the government to finalise the process and provide clarity on the future of the sugar industry: “We’re still interested, and we’re pretty sure we could run it completely differently. But the government needs to formalise the process.”
    But Weir remained resolute. “What I will not do is give them title to government assets without them putting in their investment. That is the reason why government retains an interest in the project.” sheriabrathwaite@barbadostoday.bb

    Source: BT


  2. Is not this same RH government not the same that giving away $17M piece of land to the bank? Col Browne pay a back hand bribe and all your problems will go away. This government needs to go.


  3. How can current and potential investors feel about this deal with government and CoopEnergy given the trumplike uncertainty? Make it make sense.


  4. All games. One would need a belief system of a Christian to suppose that any of these agencies can, in a material way, serve the population and not the utility which they are said to be.

    The truth is that governments have long been in hoc with the majors and not one shiiite will change until heads are sent looking for shoulders.


  5. Successive governments have been wary or so they say about taking decisions that will destabilize the grid.

    https://barbadosunderground.net/2013/09/24/energy-in-renewable-energy/


  6. Does anyone know of a written plan of action for this energy project? For years Browne and the engineers have been saying that this business is much too complicated for politicians to execute.
    The engineers said that the PV business was a Ponzi scheme – and they have turned out to be right.
    They said that the change in laws was a waste of time and that it will be ineffective – and that also seems to be correct.
    They have condemned the battery storage idea as just another knee jerk reaction to the original PV Ponzi – just a much more expensive one.

    So when will government start listening to the people who actually understand these matters – instead of focusing on channelling taxpayer funds to their selected friends and allies?

  7. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    How can we seriously question why @ Bush Tea is so relentless in his critique of the governance of the country. The only people who could even attempt to give all of this confusion any blessings/ praise are hopeless partisans.
    Name one project in any area that can be given an A+. Massive confusion all around .
    We repeat : it’s very hard not to align with @ Bushie .
    Really too much brassbowlery.


  8. @ William
    The main reason why we must cuss our particular government (BOTH Bees & Dees) is that they CLEARLY have the capabilities to do EXCEEDINGLY better.

    Can you imagine the luck to be governing a little country that has not known war, famine, REAL REAL floods, earthquake, fire or tornado devastation…for EONS?
    Shiite, the last serious hurricane was 70 years ago… and a baby born during the last civil unrest is now pushing for 90 years old…

    Other countries experience one or more of such challenges seemingly every time they sneeze… even our neighbors like Jamaica, Dominica, Trinidad and Grenada…

    Then the BB people are all like well trained sheep…
    We will do practically ANYTHING that we are told…. and assume that it is for our good.
    Even when the shepherds are selling the sheep pens to African wolves, we are willing to assume that the wolves’ teeth have been extracted – and that they only drink milk…

    ALL IT WOULD TAKE for Barbados to become a MODEL that small countries could learn from, is a little humility, common sense, and a LOTTA genuine love – for self, for Bajans, and especially for the CREATOR that blessed us so bountifully.

    Instead, all we keep hearing is a lotta shiite talk about ‘how many hundred millions of $US we can attract’ … by selling our private parts, parks, and heritage.

    IT IS THE LOVE OF MONEY that creates Judases, hoes…. and that destroys brass bowls…

    Worse yet, one morning COMING SOON, we will all awake to hear that the lotta $$$US millions are not even worth the toilet paper that will be consumed, as the money lovers express their woes in diarrhea style and fashion….

  9. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @Bushie
    We were heading toward some semblance of progressive governance and it has suddenly declined because of the inept BLP and DLP. We had many opportunities to revamp and improve; to build on our successes but we just failed to be serious and then embarked on forty years of bragging that we were where we really were not.
    It’s equally amazing that we have failed to produce a truly transformative leader since Adams (senior) or (Barrow) although neither of the two could be deemed ideologically progressive but at the very least the people had some understanding of what they were trying to achieve and absolutely believed that they had some say and that their intelligence was respected.
    While we(you and me) may have differences on this African Bank deal, we shudder to think that there are those who don’t want any questions to be asked. From what we have deduced, the deal is no different from the Sandals arrangement where we were struggling to get into the all inclusive market, which at that time, was attracting much world wide travel. Now, we are trying to build relationships with African countries and from time , deals such as this one would tend to surface or be pursued. Africa trade relationships hold tremendous benefits for the entire region.
    Perhaps, what is needed is a massive media educational drive, designed to educate the people of the global force of Africa . We cannot continue to leave things to chance because we have to save our children and youth from mis and dis information about Africa.
    While Mottley is being paraded as a great communicator , it is ironic that such skills seem lacking in her governance. We agree that everything cannot be told but at least communicate clearly with the people , what can be.


  10. The White / Western World’s worst nightmare is a United Africa, with Allies in the Eastern World and developing Nations such as South America, Asia, China etc.

    It would be the antithesis of their divide to rule state of play.
    Bullies will always lie to tell you not to make friends and unite with others.


  11. NB. (in the above) I included Caribbean Islands as part of United Africa / African territories in the same way that some territories in Caribbean and Pacific are American

    US territories:
    Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Outlying Islands, U.S. Virgin Islands


  12. There is the saying to whom much is given, a lot is expected. Two unprecedented victories in the last two general elections. Enough said!


  13. Weee seriously questioned your man in the street bullShite nearly ten years ago and when you and your confederates were talking all kinds of shiiite that the end of world will come, there would be the end of the world should Barbados go into an IMF programe and SD.

    We are paraphrasing!

    Even after this writer brought the managements systems professional finically experts use to measure such, there was not even an apology, nearly ten years. Now again, you recoil to your deeply imbedded ignorance.

    But Christian cunts expect Pacha to apologize to amateurs, like you both are, on matters neither one of you have even a scintilla of understanding about, beyond the street level.

    And you can be so described as well, for your commitment to ignorance has not, in all of these fucking years,has never been assuaged by scientific information.

    Surely the IMF program and the SD were more helpful than deleterious, the sky did not fall in but both you and he are here again talking shiite again about matters beyond your competencies, skills, capabilities.

    As always we are paraphrasing.

    That someone whose modus derives from a place of divine Ignorance makes you both well matching bedfellows.

  14. William Skinner Avatar

    Pure hogwash ! The majority of contributors to BU supported going to the IMF because the general feeling was that Sandiford and company had given Mottley no choice.
    We specifically said that while we disagreed with going to the IMF , we understood the reasoning .
    There is no damn mystery as to how the IMF works. We have gone to the IMF about three or four times now. Jamaica has been in the IMF forever.


  15. You are a fucking liar. And a liar is far more dangerous than a thief, worse than a murderer, worse than …….

    Out of your ignorance you only now say that you were in a majoritarian of support of the IMF-SD now that they have gotten the country away from a precipice.

    Indeed, at the time a largely ignorant population was, the majority, was generally reticent government’s intents.

    You assholes who believe that you have some power to reorder history, to bent it to your ignorance through lies, are the worst of the worst.


  16. Keeping it short.
    View all activity through the lens of a scheme/con/scam/three-card-monte, lies/deception/thievery…
    —–**—-
    After sending 1,000 sheep to Guyana these braniacs would now like to create a million sheep flock. If I cared or thought this was genuine, I could quickly provide 2, 3 or 4 issues with this con but continue on
    -**–

    From BT epaper 3/20/2025
    Blackbelly sheep project aims for million-strong flock
    The ambitious goal of expanding the Barbados Blackbelly Sheep industry to a population of one million sheep remains viable despite public scepticism, according to Dr Leroy McClean, consultant for the Blackbelly Sheep Expansion Project.
    Addressing farmers and stakeholders at an open day held at the Animal Nutrition Unit on Wednesday, McClean reaffirmed the project’s objectives, dispelling misconceptions and underscoring its critical role in bolstering food security in Barbados and the wider Caribbean.
    McClean stressed that reaching the one million target is not an overnight undertaking but a carefully structured long-term strategy.
    “When people hear about a million sheep, they say you’re crazy,” he acknowledged. “But when we analyse the numbers, we see that it is entirely possible.”
    The expansion is directly linked to the St Barnabas Accord, a partnership between Barbados and Guyana aimed at strengthening regional food security. Under this agreement, Barbados committed to sending 1 000 Blackbelly Sheep to Guyana, leveraging that country’s extensive land, water and grazing resources to accelerate industry growth.
    “This is not about Guyana or Barbados—it is about Guyana and Barbados,” McClean emphasised, noting that the joint project was a success. “There have been false claims that all our sheep have been sent away and that none remain in Barbados. That is utter nonsense.”
    The expansion of the sheep population in Guyana is being facilitated through the Guyana Livestock Development Agency, which has already distributed animals to 140 farmers.
    Notably, 30 per cent of recipients have been women, in line with the Guyanese government’s policy of ensuring equal distribution to women, youth and people with disabilities.
    McClean highlighted Barbados’s heavy dependence on imported lamb, revealing that over a six-year period, the country imported an annual average of 1.3m kilogrammes of sheep meat at a cost of approximately $14m per year. When combined with local production, the total retail market for lamb in Barbados exceeds $24m, presenting a lucrative opportunity for farmers.
    “If we are spending $24m annually on lamb, why aren’t we positioning our farmers to capture that market?” he questioned.
    “Our objective is to reduce and ultimately eliminate our import bill.”
    Beyond meat production, he underscored the potential for a high-value leather industry, citing previous tests that confirmed the Barbados Blackbelly Sheep hides produce some of the finest-quality leather in the world. However, to realise this potential, achieving a critical mass of sheep is essential.
    One of the primary challenges to profitable sheep farming in Barbados is the high cost of feed, which McClean described as unsustainable under traditional rearing methods. To counter this, the project is promoting domestic feed production using agricultural byproducts such as cassava skins, river tamarind and cottonseed.
    “Farmers cannot achieve a good return on investment if they rely on expensive commercial feed,” he stated. “By developing alternative feed options using local inputs, we can significantly reduce costs and enhance profitability.”
    (SZB)


  17. @ Theo,
    Your skepticism is warranted.

    “When people hear about a million sheep, they say you’re crazy,” he acknowledged. “But when we analyse the numbers, we see that it is entirely possible.”

    The above comments from McClean could well have come from the mouth of Squealer from Animal Farm.

    Who needs to read George Orwell”s classic when we have this BLP cast list whom are always on their toes to impress their leader – Napoleon. Aka MAM.

    What a place!!

  18. William Skinner Avatar

    @Pacha
    We never claimed that we were in the majority or minority. We stated that the “majority of BU contributors” supported the government’s decision to go to the IMF. We clearly stated that while we don’t support going to the IMF, we understood why they went. We never support any IMF deals. We don’t need to be in the majority or minority of anything.
    And for your information, we do not agree that we are far away from any precipice because as you and others say we are still a one foot economy. A position with which we are fully in agreement. Furthermore, the IMF agreement states very clearly that the desired results will not be realised before 2035 and that is still a solid eight years from now. With current global developments, we can only now hope those targets will be met.
    So, to claim that we want to be in some majority is pure hogwash. Anybody can disagree with anything but still have the intellectuality maturity and honesty to “understand” why any decision was taken.
    To put it bluntly you : we still oppose going to the IMF.


  19. “Who needs to read George Orwell”s classic when we have this BLP cast list whom are always on their toes to impress their leader – Napoleon. Aka MAM”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    LOL
    Agreed!

    It must take special talents of ethical flexibility, to publicly make strong arguments for EXPORTING sheep to Guyana “because we don’t have the needed land space..”
    … and then shortly after – turn around to make the argument that we can suddenly accommodate 1 million sheep – and satisfy the local market…

    One imagines a puppeteer pulling the strings as they come to recognize the errors of their misguided intuition… and contorting the poppets into all kinds of embarassing positions…

    What a place…

    EVERYBODY and their respective uncles could see that the Guyana exercise was nonsense – unless of course we got a gold mine in exchange.
    But selling that deal would be a massive PR challenge…

  20. William Skinner Avatar

    William Skinner Barbados Underground February 22, 2020 @2:48 pm
    “When are we going to learn a very simple truth:
    You cannot produce a 2020 model car on a 1920 production line.
    Al we are doing is reinventing the wheel and swallowing a lot of hocus pocus nonsense. Our manufacturing sector has been in the doldrums for almost thirty years. Yet I read decently that manufacturing had declined by 12% . Question: declined from where?
    I am now hearing that the economy may grow by 1.5 %. Question: Grow from where to what?
    We have bogged down ourselves with a whole lot of feel good fantasies. We were told from the outset that our engagement with the IMF will realise its true results in fifteen years . On this very blog, I read about the magic of sealing an IMF deal in record time. Then I read on this blog that we can now advise countries how to get the best deal from the IMF. I am surprised that we did not publish a handbook: How to deal with international loan Sharks.
    I wish Ms. Mottley well but she would do well to distance herself from those who in vigorous efforts to defend her wants us to believe that our troubles can be solved overnight.
    Removing garbage from the streets only requires trucks. Removing the garbage from thinking is a bit more difficult.”

    For anyone to suggest that we are changing our position and now jumping in some majority is pure hogwash. We have never supported going to the IMF. We have always considered the IMF to be loan sharks.
    We simply said that the “majority of BU contributors” supported the government going to the IMF. We were never in that group. So for the brilliant @Pacha to come here pretending that he held tutorials on the IMF and somehow enlightened BU , is a figment of his imagination. We have not changed : never supported going but understood why Mottley went.
    We are exactly where we were five years ago.

    As the Village idiot told a very young boy going to school one morning : son learn to read before you learn how to cuss.


  21. I was a sheep, some years ago, I’m not a sheep..anymore.


  22. William Skinner
    October 11, 2018 at 9:57 am
    Rate This

    ””’This is the most amazing discussion. What we need to discuss is how a man who started ,apparently selling a low end motta car, can end up selling a portion of his business for more than four times the amount of money, that his entire country is going through all types of hoops to borrow from a well known international loan shark , known as the IMF.
    The fundamental point here is that this family ,is literally guaranteeing, that not another single generation ,will ever be in poverty while an eighty two year old pensioner is seeing his extremely modest life savings accumulated after six decades plus of hard work,go up in flames.
    I hope the irony of theses two compelling stories is not lost on all the experts who frequent BU, expounding their esteemed knowledge on a broad range of social and economic matters.
    Sometimes we need to abandon the petty intellectual/ academic one up manship, and zoom in on the broader reality of the type of country, we now live in.””

    William Skinner
    January 11, 2022 at 10:09 am
    Rate This

    @ Donna
    Agreed ! A Pure BS election.
    I want to hear from all the clowns on BU who got here parading that all of our economic woes were about to disappear because we were so damn “ brilliant “ at negotiating some “ quick deal “ with the IMF. I told them that the IMF has been in Jamaica for forty two years and to go and visit Jamaica and see what has happened with all the IMF help.
    But, I think Professor Marshall probably also reads BU and see how people are cussed and ridiculed by party hacks, encouraged by some who ought to know better, for speaking the truth.
    This must be the foolish season;
    1 National Stadium in a state of physical embarrassment but we are going to get 15 mini stadiums.
    These Duopoly apologists are shameless.
    There are no campaign issues; there is some invisible division in the country and nobody can say why an election was called.

    William Skinner
    January 11, 2022 at 10:17 am
    Rate This

    @ David
    I made my comments about the IMF pre COVID.
    Ask the government about the costs of 15 stadia. I don’t know. Just thought we should have repaired the National Stadium first.
    BTW, how is your suggestion that we export our ability to get fast loans from the IMF going?
    Peace.

    ==============================
    William Skinner is such a wanton, ignorance cunt who, in a feeble attempt to mislead offers a newer post, maybe 2022 or thereabout, to whitewash his long held, hardline, anti-IMF stances.

    As an international financial expert that position must be anathema. So toooo must be any demands from bible reading cunts, under any guise, which would violate the standards of that profession, under a pseudonym or not.

    If what William Skinner now purports were true there would have never been cause for us to demystify circumstances by presenting then an analytical model which showed that, while the avoidance of the IMF is always best preferred, there are ways to not be engulfed by the fund forever.

    Of course, the other plank was for the development of two or three more economic legs. And none of the people have done nothing since 2018 to help guide to government into these directions. But once the government has to, and will have too again, surrender state assets, these same men of straw, led by an opposition leader seeking relevance, under the rubric of the crusader ethos, are willing to pigeon coup a government absent of better alternatives. As if these fools are more important than the capitalists, within a capitalist society. Not one of these asses has ever offered to payback capital lost as a result of the shiite they constantly spew.

    But when the shareholders on BU, not one, can remember that intervention which brought a sense of clarity, quelled irrational fears, gaslighted by the ignorant purely because of the innate dislike of the IMF by a ‘former’ communist like William Skinner it leads only to an avoidable conclusion.

    Coterminously, we’ve only found the Northern Observer to have the intestinal fortitude to speak the truth consistently rewardless of his own proclivities, race, religion, class, the state of our relations, as he recalls events. People here seem deeply committed to the doctrine of moment.

    William Skinner has always been against the IMF as spearhead of imperialism. On that point he’s certainly not in any position to school Pacha. But when at the height of the IMF debate, directly after the May or June 2018 general elections, his long-standing, absolutist position was continually asserted. Now he would like to bamboozle us by choosing one of his comments from 2022, when matters were not then at critical mass, when there were clear signs of economic stabilization, when the public was about to deliver another 30-0 to the Mottley regime, to presume that we are not to see this rasssssoul idiot William Skinner as the same dyed-in-the-wool, anti-IMFer, having no exceptions, he’s always been.

    Its become untenable to have any further relationship with those, who through constant bombardment, stealth, the rewriting of recent events, dishonesty, unprovable concepts presented as foundational, etc

    I ain’t say soo will be forever the constant and defense of William Skinner. The only mouse sized cranium here who’s always had the dishonesty so always plead, expect it until that fucker dies

    FUCK OFF, ONE AND ALL

  23. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Pacha
    All you have quoted has clearly shown that we have been always and remain anti- IMF. You saved me the need to quote the same contributions we wrote back then. Thanks.
    We have never and will never embrace the IMF.
    We , as unapologetic nationalist and regionalist will never hope for our governments to fail at anything because failure comes down on the poor struggling masses.
    Your feeble attempt to prove me a stranger to the truth has been exposed for what it is-pure hog wash.
    Finallly, we don’t come here to prove anything other than we have an opinion. We find your approach to public discourse highly informative at times and then largely erratic to the extent that it can be comedic as well.
    On this occasion, we simply responded to an attempt to discredit and distort the IMF debate on BU by claiming that we were now changing our opinion. You have now proved conclusively that we did not.
    We thank you for your honesty in correcting your mistake. And as usual we also thank you for your response.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading