← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The acting Governor also disclosed that the Bank has indicated to commercial banks that it will engage with stakeholders on the question of bank fees and charges (BT).


RBC
Royal Bank of Canada

Last week Scotiabank shelved a plan to charge customers a third party transfer fee processed on the Automatic Clearing House (ACH) and Real Time Payments (RTP) platforms. The bank’s public disclosure on the decision to charge triggered a directive from the Central Bank to all financial institutions using ACH and RTP that such a fee would contravene the National Payments System Act (NPSA) 2021.

Yesterday Central Bank issued a second communication to advise RBC had agreed to stop charging its customers for third party transfers using the ACH and RTP. From all reports RBC has been flying under the radar for an extended period. It other words, if Scotiabank had not communicated a plan to charge the public, including the Central Bank and so called consumer watchdog organisations, would have been ‘non the wiser’.

Central Bank has advised that effective 12 January 2024 RBC will discontinue the illegal charge and refund fees collected from the 2 January 2024, the date of the first Central Bank directive to financial institutions. Based on public reports posted to social media RBC has been charging customers a third party fee long before the 2 January 2024. The question for the regulator – if public feedback is correct, why was RBC asked to refund the illegal fee from 2 January 2024 and not when it was first introduced?

Barbadians have been posting that other banks are charging for business transactions using ACH and it continues. How difficult is it for the Central Bank to confirm from ALL financial institutions whether a fee is being applied to ACH and RTP transactions and to fully advise an unsuspecting public.

RBC to stop charging customers and refund them for ACH transactions

Published on
January 10, 2024

The Central Bank of Barbados wishes to advise that following discussions with RBC Royal Bank, RBC has confirmed that effective January 12, 2024, it will no longer charge its customers for transactions they make using the automated clearing house (ACH), including through the real-time payments (RTP) system.

RBC has also indicated that it will reimburse customers who have incurred these charges since the Central Bank’s January 2, 2024 directive that no fees should be applied to such transactions. These refunds will be made no later than January 19, 2024.

“We have been engaging with RBC for the past week, and they have indicated that while they intend to comply with our instructions, they need some time to reconfigure their system,” revealed Alwyn Jordan, acting Governor of the Central Bank. “They have also committed to reversing the ACH-related transaction charges their clients incurred from January 2, 2024 until the end of the reconfiguration period, so that they are not disadvantaged by the delay.”

The acting Governor also disclosed that the Bank has indicated to commercial banks that it will engage with stakeholders on the question of bank fees and charges.

Barbados Today

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

52 responses to “Keeping an eye on bank fees”


  1. Retired executives praise Central Bank’s move

    By Tony Best

    Three top retired Barbadian bank executives abroad have hailed the Barbados Central Bank for its successful intervention in the thorny issue of bank fees.

    At the same time, they have heaped praise on the Barbados Consumer Empowerment Network, BCEN, for its highly vocal and appropriate stance against the introduction of customer fees for electronic banking services.

    One of them, David Cutting, who spent more than a decade as chief executive officer of Britain’s Standard Chartered Bank in Nigeria, Uganda and Botswana during the first decade of the 21st century, said the efforts of the Central Bank that led Scotiabank to drop a planned fee was a clear demonstration of a “healthy” relationship in the banking sector.

    Phil Broome, a retired vicepresident of Scotiabank in Canada, and Winston Cox, a former Central Bank governor, said there was a persistent global problem with bank fees.

    As Cutting saw it, the outcome was a victory for both the Central Bank and BCEN.

    “The dispute’s outcome suggests two things to me: (a) BCEN was effective and (b) the relationship between the regulator (Central Bank) and the bank (Scotiabank) is also healthy, given that the Central Bank was able to persuade [it] to revisit the charges,” he told the Sunday Sun.

    “It showed the responsiveness to concerns in the public domain about the costs of banking and using the banks. The idea here is that you don’t want to drive customers away from using the banks to transfer money because that has inherent risks.”

    Cutting, a retired top banking executive with decades of international experience and who is now Barbados’ honorary consul in Atlanta, as well as a team leader of a consulting firm in Georgia, said the Central Bank acted wisely by getting involved in the controversy.

    He said the imposition of bank fees for electronic banking “was not unusual”.

    “Here in the US and in most markets some sort of fee is charged for electronic transactions. The question often is how much that fee is and what are the terms.”

    Interestingly, Cutting, who was also a top bank executive in New York, Hong Kong and Singapore, recalled a recent attempt to wire a donation to a church in Barbados. He said when he found out that the bank transaction fee was going to be $25 “to send $100, I decided I wouldn’t bother. I found another way to make that transaction”.

    He said the charging of fees for electronic bank transactions was often “contentious” and had a negative impact on customers.

    “It suggests a healthy relationship between the regulator and the banks operating in the market. Sometimes that relationship can be more contentious and sometimes the regulator is pushing too hard and the banks push back. In this case (in Barbados) it seems as though there was some agreement as the bank revisited the charge for its services,” said the graduate of Harrison College.

    Broome, who retired from Scotiabank in Ontario a decade ago, like Cutting, recalled a problem he had with a bank in Barbados over Internet banking fees.

    “Sometimes the fees can be excessive. Bank fees are a trouble all over the world. Kudos to the Central Bank, it was just trying to make sure that the customers were fairly treated. What happened in Barbados was a positive thing for consumers,” he said.

    Broome, chairman of the Barbados-Canada Foundation which has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of specialised equipment to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, added: “We all must make money. Every institution must make money. If you do something you have to get paid for the service.”

    Cox, a Caribbean and European trained economist, said Scotiabank acted “wisely” when it reversed its decision to impose the $1.25 fee for electronics payment after the Central Bank and BCEN had complained about it.

    “I am not sure that Scotiabank incurred any expense in participating in the electronic payment system and therefore had no cost to pass on to its customers,” he said.

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading