Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The judgement handed down by the Court of Appeal in the matter No:108 of 2008 (attached) is compelling reading, all 67 pages. In summary, John Patrick Connor and his wife (vendors) retained Philip Vernon Nicholls  (lawyer) to facilitate the sale of a property, purchase price $950,000. The proceeds of the sale were never paid to the Connors now deceased. The judgement exposes a litany of woes and vindicates Barbados Underground on several issues raised- see updates on BU’s Tales from the Courts page.

In brief the report prepared by the Disciplinary Report to support request Attorney-at-Law Philip Vernon Nicholls be removed from the roll of lawyers practising in Barbados was dismissed because of ‘procedural irregularities’. Here is Justice of Appeal Rajendra Narine (p.43) scathing dissenting opinion.

 

  READ FULL DECISION

 

It is unfortunate to witness another case of an oversight body (Disciplinary Committee) established by statute to protect the interest of the public from lawyers who engage in unprofessional conduct not met.

 


 

A resource link:

The Disciplinary Committee is created pursuant to the Legal Professions Act Cap 370A and is “charged with the duty of upholding standards of professional conduct”. The Committee is charged with making rules in relation to the standards of professional etiquette and conduct of attorneys. It comprises seven attorneys, of whom at least three shall be of not less than ten years’ standing in the legal profession, nominated by the Bar Association. Each member shall hold tenure for a period not exceeding two years but each member is eligible for renomination.

Raising the BAR


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

87 responses to “Disciplinary Committee Fails to Protect Client now Deceased, AGAIN!”


  1. 🎵What did they get?
    A big rock!🎶


  2. nothing new here really except this boy Philip must have caused great shame to his parents
    the connors are not the first to be screwed by the courts and they wont be the last
    and I speak with authority on this matter
    HOWEVER, SOON AND VERY SOON THE RIGHTEOUS JUDGE AND PARACLETE WILL INTERVENE
    UNTIL THEN LET THE ENSUING BLABBERING BEGIN
    NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL THE TIME OF THE MILLENNIAL KINGDOM……….AND THIS CAN NOT BE REFUTED
    LOL LOL LOL


  3. My heart goes out to the Connor family. Severe attorney in Barbados should hang his/her head in shame for allowing this to happen and, doing nothing about it collectively. There are times when the docility of Barbadians has served us well and there are times when this same docility has allowed us to be taken advantage of.

    The question now remains, what steps have been taken to ensure that this never, ever happens again?


  4. XxxxSevere attorneyxxxx ….Every attorney in Barbados


  5. Note how quickly QCs were quick to defend Vonda Pile and rap the president of the BABA on the knuckles for commenting on the Bennett matter.


  6. Philip Nicholls has written two books on the crap he faced.

    His problem was his partners (and others) if I understand it right.

    His problem now is he knows too much!!

    Funnily enough he was the 11th respondent my mother sued so I get to hear a lot of the innards.



  7. In brief the report prepared by the Disciplinary Report to support request Attorney-at-Law Philip Vernon Nicholls be removed from the roll of lawyers practising in Barbados was dismissed because of ‘procedural irregularities’.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    What were the irregularities?


  8. @John

    Have you read the document attached?

    The law states 4 makes a quorum to give validity to the report that was submitted to the CJ by the disciplinary committee and a member of the committee stated the final report submitted by Chairman Cicely Chase receive no input from the other committee members.


  9. Donna..that’s a hell of a lot of money to lose to thieves in the bar association and judiciary and never get it back, but when they collude, they do it well….thousands of people on the island and OFF…have lost much, much more and much much less.

    ..those thieves don’t care who they go after and would go to any lengths to get away with it, those in the former white law firm were some dangerous evil, heartless beasts….the wife of one of them acted as though she was entitled to steal clients money by the hundreds of thousands of dollar…..and threw a fit if denied access, she should have been dragged around in public in handcuffs, heard the husband ran from the island and John somebody and never returned, don’t know if the fraud croaked yet….the other crook is on BU Lawyers in the News..she got disbarred..


  10. If you check the full decision you will see that you have misrepresented Chandler JAP.

    Even the signature does not look like his!!

    I more suspect the extract is from the dissenting opinion of Narine, JAP.

    You better check before you bring down the wrath of the court on your head.


  11. If you look at the decision in its entirety you will see that there are three opinions, one of them dissenting.

    You have chosen the dissenting one which of course is not the determinant in the matter.


  12. Thanks for your correction John. The dissenting opinion was taken because of the uncompromising language used by the JA to describe the matter.


  13. I find the other opinions far more interesting reading!!

    Goodridge JAP for example describes the process as a fishing trip.

    Chandler JAP is pretty uncompromising too.


  14. @John

    Fair enough. Good you read the document. Many do not like to read.


  15. I did not read it, but I knew what it said so pointing out the error was a cinch.

    The problem is the proceedings of the Disciplinary Committee.

    You can’t build a house on sand.


  16. If you read the first book you will quickly realise there is alot more in the mortar than the pestle.


  17. You better apologize to Justice of Appeal Chandler for misquoting him.


  18. @John, the blog was amended? The blogmaster read the first book. It seems Nicholls was a little naive in the process considering his pedigree?

    What changes would you propose at the Disciplary Committee?


  19. Gail himself should be in prison AND DISBARRED…

    they have had TOO MUCH PROTECTION from the frauds in the parliament since the 1950s, who themselves should be in prison and disbarred for enabling and condoning these crimes against 3 generations of the population, with many of them also VERY ACTIVE participants..in massive thefts.

    but they thought themselves UNTOUCHABLE, INVINCIBLE and ABOVE THE LAW for themselves and whomever else they anointed with their poison..


  20. DavidAugust 9, 2021 10:31 AM

    @John, the blog was amended? The blogmaster read the first book. It seems Nicholls was a little naive in the process considering his pedigree?

    What changes would you propose at the Disciplary Committee?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Inquorate, and no minutes.

    This is pretty basic stuff to correct.


  21. I think Philip expected more from the legal profession, probably because of his pedigree that his expectations existed.

    He should have figured it out … Michael Simmons was at Cottle Catford when he first joined.

    I dealt with one of the Partners routinely through my family’s business and would never have expected he would end up finally with an arrest warrant on his head, issued by the court in Barbados.

    He died in the US.

    The meekest, mildest individual but man … if I told you what I reckon he did.

    One thing speaks volumes for Philip, he has never been inclined to run … it is in his pedigree.

    His health has suffered but he has not run.


  22. The process is simple, a quorum of 4 and the involvement of those who made up the quorum collaborate on the final submission to the CJ with the request to remove from roll. What is so difficult for QCs to comply with a simple process?


  23. Nicholls should not have allowed the P&L of Cottle Catford of which he was a member to pull ruin his career. There are consequences for bad decisions?


  24. He was not the senior partner until 2002.

    Cottle Catford was sold out by a fifth column.

    The former senior partner ended up with the arrest warrant over his head but not until 2015 or so.

    Read the book.


  25. EVEN PETER AND PAUL MADE BAD DECISIONS
    SO DID MOSES ADAM JOHN MARK AND JONAH
    AS WELL AS KING DAVID AND SOLOMON
    IT IS HUMAN TO ERR
    BUT GOD IS THE GOD OF THE SECOND CHANCE


  26. I SIT AND LAUGH AS MY POSTS ARE MODERATED AND EVEN NOT PUT UP
    BUT LOTS OF CURSING AND RIDICULOUS MUSIC THAT IS WAY OFF IS LOL LOL


  27. The spider’s web !!!!!


  28. @John

    It does not matter he wasn’t the senior partner. He refused to disentangle himself from the firm given what was before him.


  29. Here is JAP Goodridge’s conclusions

    https://imgur.com/AexidzR

    https://imgur.com/bznAzpA


  30. For me the question is how come JAP Narine is at such variance with the other two JAPs?

    Another question I think worthy of asking is what benefit does the blogmaster gain in highlighting a dissenting opinion and not the fact that minutes were missing and meetings were inquorate?


  31. He was fought every step of the way for trying to make amends by the same frauds claiming to represent the thieves and others, there was too much to come out about the decades of thefts including all the WILLS, thousands i believe it was that were sitting in a corner, i imagine those original wills were forged and other people’s names added in the property/inheritance thefts, still popular among bar association and judiciary criminals….thousands of elderly and their beneficiaries got robbed, he should have realized by then what and who he was up against and disentangle…sometimes trying to do the right thing comes with consequences when you are up against a force of thieves.

    don’t know why they bothered, their names are notorious far and wide anyway…no one anywhere trusts any of them and they will all eventually FADE AWAY…no matter how many slave names and titles they carry…


  32. @John

    Does it matter? The full document was posted fir all who have eyes to read.

  33. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    Very interesting and educative. Essential reading for those interested in the evolution of the Barbadian society.


  34. DavidAugust 9, 2021 12:23 PM

    @John

    Does it matter? The full document was posted fir all who have eyes to read.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Having eyes to read and reading are two different concepts.

    What you have done is deliberately promote a dissenting opinion over that of the court.

    Why?

    Philip should not be in the predicament he is in and of course it is his responsibility but the predicament should not have arisen among honorable men and women who have sworn an oath.

    It may be the matter will go to CCJ and be overturned.

    But until that happens you should accept the verdict.

    The sale of the land according to the decision took place in 2007, 5 years after Philip Nicholls became the senior partner.

    Read the book and fill in the occurrences in those 5 years.


  35. John all and sundry are aware given your everlasting family feud that has engaged the court system is inclined to think there is a slug under every rock.

    You may have the last word.


  36. We are too noncombative and weak as a people. We are a bunch of sheep. That’s why the politicians and the powerful minorities can take advantage of us without consequence. Somebody should have been in a coffin by now because of this injustice.


  37. It is a long time this matter has taken to secure the decision. This is wrong, this is unethical, this is unprofessional and last but not least this is incompetence of a very high degree.


  38. https://www.nationnews.com/2021/08/09/lawyer-chides-bar-president/

    strange indeed how they JUMP to each others defense ONE CAUGHT doing illegal things, and not a PEEP out of them when billions of dollars in ESTATES, LAND, BANK ACCOUNTS etc are stolen from the vulnerable population…no defense when beneficiaries are PUSHED INTO GENERATIONAL POVERTY because the bar/judiciary SYNDICATE closed ranks……personal injury cases CAN NEVER FINISH…..and the beat of criminality goes on and on and on..

    but they defending each other to the end.


  39. WURA,

    Hard to believe! Do not take the law into your own hands! Civilized people take it to the courts! My best friend is civilized. She took it to the courts. She is still waiting. Now they say they have no record of the case ever having started!

    There is no justice for the civilized in Barbados!

    🎵It’s a jungle out there!🎶


  40. There is justice but too many cases fall through the cracks. Everyday cases in the lower and high courts are tried and decisions handed down.


  41. What pedigree? His mother taught me a Q.C. A judgmental, class conscious fart! Judged my same best friend wrongfully!


  42. AT QC


  43. How come it took almost a decade to get a report and when the report surfaces its bona fides can so easily be overturned?

    The disciplinary Committee had Philip Nicholls in its clutches (2010) within 3 years of the sale (2007) if I reading this report right.

    This should have been done and dusted then.


  44. Why would a lawyer of Cicely Chase calibre make such a rookie mistake?


  45. What was going on in Barbados between 2002 when Philip Nicholls became senior partner and 2010 when he ended up before the disciplinary committee?

    Something must have been going on to turn so many heads foolish.


  46. You’ve read the book, tell us nuh!!


  47. @Davie
    Good afternoon.

    Excuse my intrusion, Not to derail your topic. However, I received a call from de U. K. On de below listed subject:

    Our Tourism Industry ?

    Britain 🇬🇧 poised to give BDS a HARD SLAP n de face, while we await Barney’s Large army arrival with all dem
    life-preservers.

    Can Gabriel Abed save us ?

    Masey Green said “he don’t speak de lingo.”

    Is de Weed crops on de horizon byway of fast track ?

    We already secure 253 kilograms in a SAFE HOUSE from de crooks and dishonest peoples.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading