← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Last Sunday night during prime time an interview by Oprah Winfrey with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attracted 17 million viewers in the USA. The blogmaster did not watch but read a few of the reviews summarized by traditional and not so traditional media.

Several allegations (revelations) were introduced in the interview, however, the one that resonated with the blogmaster is the allegation the Royal family expressed a concern about the degree of blackness of the unborn Archie.

Why does the blogmaster care about the comment?

Meghan said her son Archie, now aged one, had been denied the title of prince because there were concerns within the royal family about “about how dark his skin might be when he’s born.

That was relayed to me from Harry, those were conversations that family had with him,” Meghan recounted in an interview with Oprah Winfrey aired on CBS late on Sunday.

Meghan declined to say who had aired such concerns, as did Harry. He said his family had cut them off financially and that his father Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, had let him down and refused to take his calls at one point.

The Irish Times

It was not long ago the world reacted violently to the 8 minutes and 46 seconds heinous act which triggered the resurgence of the #BlackLivesMatter movement in the USA and beyond. As a Black man living in a majority Black country full in the knowledge of the slave trade and its vestige which continue to plague our way of life two hundred years later- it was a dark revelation this time shared by insiders.

Do we need to be reminded the Queen of England is the titular head of Barbados?

Related Link:

There is no need to prolix on this matter. The decision by the government of Barbados to move to a Republic with haste should attract little or no opposition from Barbadians post the Oprah interview. The decision by a majority of CARICOM countries to loiter on the steps of the UK Privy Council – continuing to recognize it as final court of court is again exposed – should frame a renewed legitimate call from the citizenry to recognize the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).

Since Barbados Underground came into assistance there has been voluminous writing about the pros and cons of Barbados shifting to a Republic. The blogmaster has been consistent in the view the growth of a majority Black sovereign nation must possess the cajones to recognize one of its own as head of state. After the horrific insight by Meghan AND Prince Harry on the weekend into the ethos which pervades Buckingham Palace and the royal family, all that is left to be said by ALL Bajans about if monarchy or republic is – WE REST.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

540 responses to “Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Revelation – We Rest”


  1. I think Prince William has a wonderful opportunity to stamp his claim to be next King of England.

    If it is given to him and he takes hold of it, I reckon we’ll see more and more of him in the coming days as he takes control of the situation on behalf of his family.

    Prince Charles I feel will step aside and leave the way open for his first born son to assume his position as rightful heir to the throne.

    Long live the new King who ever he is to be.

    God save him.


  2. Who gives a fuck what John thinks except 2 other cunts no names mentioned wack ass bajan scholars preacher doctor and news editor


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsPPh7tNWUo


  3. For the moment though, the Queen got this.


  4. Steuspe



  5. I like this one better


  6. The organ music is too sweet in this one.


  7. John, you don’t have any cow-itch in yours fields that needs to be removed that you have so much time to spend on BU?

    I dealt with my cow-itch yesterday. Once you have dealt with cow-itch the boys of BU are nothing.


  8. @Sargeant March 10, 2021 11:07 PM “John is wearing his misogyny colours proudly.”

    Maybe his woman left him?

    Harry still has his. And she is young and beautiful.


  9. John has a new gf/lover. Didn’t he say Hal Austin ‘complement’ him. What a strange couple… Where do I send the gift…


  10. Just dawned on me that I am trolling.
    Will stop it…


  11. Cuhdear BajanMarch 11, 2021 3:05 PM

    @Sargeant March 10, 2021 11:07 PM “John is wearing his misogyny colours proudly.”

    Maybe his woman left him?

    Harry still has his. And she is young and beautiful.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    His is older than he is, plus, soiled goods!!


  12. My own younger dan me.


  13. A divorced spouse cased an abdication in 1936.

    A divorced prospective spouse cause Princess Margaret to go haywire.

    A divorced spouse will probably prevent Charles becoming king.

    ….. you all understand or it passing over your heads???


  14. Ok John Epstein.


  15. t
    This topic is about H&M’s interview. However, if John has a lady, or ladyboy, younger than himself, it won’t last long without some viagara. Women should always look for a man younger, at least by 10 years. Women never lose their libido, men do.


  16. Is Windsor Castle off Limits ?

    The term “half-caste” had its origins in nineteenth century British colonial administrations, emerging in the twentieth century as the quotidian label for those whose ancestry comprised multiple ethnic/racial groups, usually encompassing “White”. From the 1920s–1960s the term was used in Britain as a derogatory racial category associated with the moral condemnation of “miscegenation”. Yet today the label continues to be used as a self-descriptor and even survives in some official contexts. This paradox – of both derogatory racial category and self descriptor – is explored in the context of the term’s social evolution, drawing upon the theoretical constructs of the internal-external dialectic of identification and labelling theory.

    Elizabeth II Vs Mixed-Race Matters???


  17. Wasn’t exactly a secret but….

    https://scontent.fbgi3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/157656996_2147464662057335_4034147328515949220_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=a26aad&_nc_ohc=leQq3Px4DeYAX_sKWMx&_nc_ht=scontent.fbgi3-1.fna&oh=1c75cc0fe2dd43034762ed002c9c18e6&oe=607001B2

    United States of Africa
    tStps2t2onsoredhm ·
    QUEEN ELIZABETH’S GREAT-GREAT-GREAT GRANDMOTHER WAS BLACK
    By Kweku Ofori
    Princess Sophie Charlotte was born on this date in 1744. She was the second Black Queen of England. Philippa of Hainault was the first Black Queen of England…

    Charlotte was the eighth child of the Prince of Mirow, Germany, Charles Louis Frederick, and his wife, Elisabeth Albertina of Saxe-Hildburghausen. In 1752, when she was eight years old, Sophie Charlotte’s father died. As princess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Sophie Charlotte was descended directly from an African branch of the Portuguese Royal House, Margarita de Castro y Sousa. Six different lines can be traced from Princess Sophie Charlotte back to Margarita de Castro y Sousa.
    George I of Great Britain’s grandmother was Elizabeth Stuart The Winter Queen of Bohemia and the daughter of James VI of Scotland and James I of England and subsequently Great Britain. George I was the grandfather of Charlotte’s eventual husband (George III). As a Protestant and a descendant of the Stuart Kings he was chosen to become king. The long lineage of Scottish kings and queens is often sidelined in the ancestry of the current royal family.

    She married George III of England on September 8, 1761, at the Chapel Royal in St James’s Palace, London, at the age of 17 years of age becoming the Queen of England and Ireland. The conditions of the marriage contract were, ‘The young princess, join the Anglican church and be married according to Anglican rites, and never ever involve herself in politics’. Although the Queen had an interest in what was happening in the world, especially the war in America, she fulfilled her marital agreement. The Royal couple had fifteen children, thirteen of whom survived to adulthood. Their fourth eldest son was Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, later fathered Queen Victoria.

    Queen Charlotte made many contributions to Britain as it is today, though the evidence is not obvious or well publicized. Her African bloodline in the British royal family is not common knowledge. Portraits of the Queen had been reduced to fiction of the Black Magi, until two art historians suggested that the definite African features of the paintings derived from actual subjects, not the minds of painters.

    In Queen Charlotte’s era slavery was prevalent and the anti-slavery campaign was growing. Portrait painters of the royal family were expected to play down or soften Queen Charlotte’s African features. Painters such as Sir Thomas Lawrence, who painted, Queen Charlotte in the autumn of 1789 had their paintings rejected by the royal couple who were not happy with the representations of the likeness of the Queen. These portraits are amongst those that are available to view now, which could be seen as continuing the political interests of those that disapprove of a multi-racial royal family for Britain.
    Sir Allan Ramsey produced the most African representations of the Queen and was responsible for the majority of the paintings of the Queen. Ramsey’s inclination to paint truer versions of the Queen could be seen to have come from being ‘an anti-slavery intellectual of his day. The Coronation painting by Ramsey, of the Queen was sent out to the colonies/commonwealth and played a subtle political role in the anti-slavery movement. Johann Zoffany also frequently painted the Royal family in informal family scenes.

    Queen Charlotte was a learned woman, her letters indicate that she was well read and had interests in the fine arts. The Queen is known to have supported and been taught music by Johann Christian Bach. She was extremely generous to Bach’s wife after Bach’s death. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, at aged eight dedicated his Opus 3 piece to the Queen at her request. Also an amateur botanist, Queen Charlotte helped to establish Kew Gardens bringing amongst others the Strelitzia Reginae, a flowering plant from South Africa. The Queen who had the first one in her house in 1800 introduced the Christmas tree to England. It was said to be decorated with, ‘sweetmeats, almonds and raisins in papers, fruit and toys. Also the Queen Charlotte Maternity hospital was established in London. Set up as a charitable institution, it is the oldest maternity care institution in England.

    Queen Charlotte died on November 17, 1818 at Dutch House in Surrey, now Kew Palace, in the presence of her eldest son, the Prince Regent. She is buried at St George’s Chapel, Windsor. The only private writings that have survived are Queen Charlotte’s 444 letters to her closest confidant her older brother, Charles II, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. On 23 May 1773 in a letter, the Queen felt she was in a position of privilege yet a task. Her Christian faith was a protection and a method of endurance, as she quotes from the Bible and recognizes her role as a royal of God beyond her royal role on earth. An exhibition took place in 2004, at the Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace displaying Charlotte and George’s collections and tastes in the arts.

    Queen Charlotte was the great great-great grandmother of the present Queen Elizabeth II who still lives in the expanded Buckingham House, now Buckingham Palace. Kew gardens still flourishes and is always being expanded, also the Queen Charlotte maternity hospital and many other places still carry her name in honor globally such as Charlotte town, Canada and Fort Charlotte, St Vincent, West Indies.”


  18. It seems to some people in the great white north, that the wicked witch of Wiltshire is the person who made the remarks and Harry is disappointed in his father because he did not rebuke his former mistress. uh gone


  19. @John March 11, 2021 3:29 PM “His is older than he is, plus, soiled goods!!”

    Older? What’s 2 or 3 years?

    And what is soiled goods? Are you telling me then that male ejaculate something dirty which soils women? Id so how does this soiling take place? If male ejaculate is NOT dirty, how then can a woman be soiled by having had one husband or two, or three or four or more?

    Or are you just being nasty and racist as usual?

    No wonder ya woman went long ’bout she business.


  20. All of you BU men whose ejaculate has soiled your women please raise your hand.


  21. Harry must prefer cali to stuffy london as he can puff the holy erb in a legal style
    you got to fight for the right to party

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgLVQY9Nr2w


  22. There is nothing worst than an old, vulgar, common, coarse, repulsive person. S/he must be an embarrassment to his/her children and grandchildren.


  23. Cuhdear BajanMarch 11, 2021 5:39 PM

    The misogyny is strong with this one. But we knew that already. His phrase demonstrates how he looks at women and his view of the relationship between men and women.

    Not surprising however, as i have said already, this pseudo-Victorian and plantation warped mindset was rife in Barbados, slowly being exorcised.

    Not only a very unhealthy view of sexuality, but just very strange. Probably tied to the mental bonds of the slave plantation era.

    Such a Barbadian historical expert, but not able to analyse some of the deep and dark aspects that still remain.


  24. @555dubstreet March 11, 2021 5:34 AM “Oprah is better than the Rush cunt that the crackers and kkk love.”

    Healthier, fitter and better looking too and ALIVE.


  25. @ John March 11, 2021 1:06 PM
    “Prince Charles I feel will step aside and leave the way open for his first born son to assume his position as rightful heir to the throne.

    Long live the new King who ever he is to be.”
    God save him.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Which “God” is that? Lord Mountbatten?

    Do you want the queen in waiting to go ballistic?

    That married woman called Camilla was the secret ‘foop-stick’ of Charlie from the time he was a youngster. Whom do you think too his maiden and blew his fuse?

    Do you know what that lady of the day put herself through?

    She has been to the hell of controversy and scandal and she has no plans whatsoever of turning her back from wearing that crown of diamonds allocated for the queen consort.

    Do you really feel she is going to let poor Charlie give up his birthright like his stupid great uncle Eddie?

    Willie would have to do a coup d’état, the old French style, on the old Charlie’s life to keep Camilla away from that lifelong yearning prize.

    But the ghost of Lady Di must consult with that of Lady Macbeth before Karma can work her magic.


  26. “There is nothing worst than an old, vulgar, common, coarse, repulsive person. S/he must be an embarrassment to his/her children and grandchildren.”

    presumably you have never met queen elisa before as you haven’t dropped it in the conversation bragging about it on bu
    people who have met her in buck pal say she doesn’t always speak the queens english and can revert to a very good cockney accent when she wants


  27. @Hal Austin March 11, 2021 5:54 PM “There is nothing worst than an old, vulgar, common, coarse, repulsive person. S/he must be an embarrassment to his/her children and grandchildren.”

    We all know that Hal is referring to Camilla, his adulterous future queen.

    Me? I am beloved by family, friends, neighbours, church members and former colleagues.

    I’ve been asked but never in my life have I phucked another woman’s husband.

    So Hal can get lost.


  28. I knew cuhdear could handle him, but I prefer
    “presumably you have never met queen elisa before as you haven’t dropped it in the conversation bragging about it on bu”
    to
    “We all know that Hal is referring to Camilla, his adulterous future queen.”


  29. Hal the lost soul who is not offended by John’s all day insults to Meaghan, his reference to the lady as soiled, his suggestion that the lady’s husband abandons her, but is offended when I asked if there is something intrinsically sullying about male ejaculate.

    Hal you idiot a woman’s previous sexual partners or previous marriages cannot sully her unless male ejaculate is dirty.

    Is your ejaculate dirty old fool?


  30. Soiled goods means a used,dirty product,something which is not in new condition any more.It can be dirty or broken or damaged in some way.It means that the person is damaged and no good any more,in contrast to the other character who is “at the top of her game” in very good condition,desirable,attractive …. like Kate Middleton.

    The point is there is a history going back to the 1930’s where divorce has played a pivotal part in individual lives of the Royal Family.

    Megan Markle got involved in what she may take to be a soap opera but which is taken very seriously by the family she sought to become a member.

    As I have shown in the clip of God Save the Queen, Megan and Harry are on record at their wedding as literally “kissing the ring” of the Queen, the head of that family.

    Their behaviour is contemptible as they seek to denigrate the very family of which they are members.

    If they did not want to be members, make a clean break.

    Moaning and groaning over the fact that Archie was not made a prince is despicable when he is not even due the honour.


  31. @TheOGazerts March 11, 2021 7:08 PM “I knew cuhdear could handle him.”

    I handled some cow-itch yesterday, so John and Hal together?

    Less than nothing.

    Lolll!!!


  32. I would expect that on the passing of the Queen, Prince Charles will abdicate and Prince William will become His Royal Highness, King of England, Scotland and Ireland with Princess Kate Middleton his queen.

    Prince Charles is in the same boat as Prince Harry but he bats higher up the order.

    He will be the head of state of Barbados as well.

    The line of succession exists through their three children, perhaps to be even more.

    Prince Harry and Megan will just become just one more challenge the Royal family had to face and overcome.


  33. Both Charles and Camilla are divorced.

    Both have stood before God and sworn to take spouses “till death do us part”.

    Both have broken their marriage vow.

    Both are soiled goods.

    They are not soiled goods because of some physical condition but because of the fact they have not been true to their vows taken before God.

    It is as simple as that.

    Difficult for simpletons to understand, but nonetheless simple.

    Charles’ only choice is to abdicate when the time comes.

    He has made his choice so this one will be made for him.


  34. David

    “Soiled goods” ! This is how John Knox describes women who are not virgins. Women who are older than their partner are also of lesser value, it seems.

    Every other post on every blog is made by this caveman.

    Please post another Trump blog where this horrible beast can have his fun. I had to spend my day at a Chicago concert to relieve the toxicity he brings to EVERYTHING.

    Some days you just need to forget that such vile creatures as John Knox exist and enjoy the best of humanity.

    Tomorrow it will be Earth Wind and Fire!

    My house is caveman free by design. The foulness of John Knox’s aura has no business lingering in the atmosphere to make my stomach sick.

    Seeing vomit makes me retch. John Knox is like caveman vomit.


  35. God has a way to make all clean.


  36. John is your ejaculate, or maybe I should use the vulgar and say cum, soiled, dirty, diseased, capable of soiling, dirtying, spreading disease to others?

    Hal is your ejaculate, or maybe I should use the vulgar and say cum, soiled, dirty, diseased, capable of soiling, dirtying, spreading disease to others?


  37. DonnaMarch 11, 2021 7:58 PM

    David

    “Soiled goods” ! This is how John Knox describes women who are not virgins. Women who are older than their partner are also of lesser value, it seems.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    How does your logic apply to Prince Charles?


  38. It is quite possible for a woman who is not a virgin to stand before God and make her marriage vow.

    That’s between her and God.

    She doesn’t vow she is a virgin, just that she will forsake all others.


  39. Same for a man.


  40. @Donna March 11, 2021 7:58 PM ““Soiled goods” ! This is how John Knox describes women who are not virgins.”

    Even the person the Christian church describes as the Blessed Virgin Mary was not a virgin for very long. Then and now very early marriage was common in the Middle East and the rest of the world. The woman very likely was no longer a virgin by her 20th birthday, and more than likely enjoyed a normal healthy sex life with her man Joseph.

    Idiotic men expecting 30 something women to be virgins.


  41. DPD still does not get it. He thinks most people are moved in.a rational manner.

    Ignoring racist policies can be explained away because of the complexities of international relations. Omissions may be explained away as oversights.

    But what could be the reason for discussing what will be the colour of Meghan Markle’s baby except for fear of a good “strike back”???

    DPD seems unaware that the world is now ready for real discussion as it never was before. DPD seems unaware of the straw being the thing that broke the camel’s back. DPD seems unaware that this thing has caused a rethink in former colonies far and wide.

    I guess he is afraid to hope. Me, I am afraid not to hope. And I have seen that “One one blow does kill ole cow” and “Wuh en happen in a year does happen in a day.”

    Who cares what is the catalyst as long as the reaction takes place????


  42. @John March 11, 2021 8:05 PM “It is quite possible for a woman who is not a virgin to stand before God and make her marriage vow. That’s between her and God.”

    Well I think that you should leave Meghan’s alleged “soiling” to her and to God. She does not need you to advocate before God for her. She has Jesus Christ the Righteous. How do you know that Gd has not long forgiven any alleged “soiling”?

    You are just a sinner just like all the rest ‘o we. So butt out and mind your own business. Nobody needs or wants your advice.


  43. Caveman’s vomit!


  44. And notice not a word about “soiling” from John where his favorite Donald Trump is concerned. Trump a man who took more pvssy than whole peas take fire.

    How do we spell: Hypocrite? Deceitful? Two- Faced, Dishonest?


  45. Maybe John enjoys being spanked by strong black women, just like the ones who had to cut his @ss when he was a little boy.


  46. Harry believes he married up with Meghan and had to grow up and become more mature with an older woman
    he could have picked from many other women who would have been more acceptable as they were lily white
    but he thought Meghan was exotic and unusual and whites were plain common and average in UK

    John has different taste and thinks the reverse but no one cares what John thinks

    He is doing the right thing being supportive of his wife instead of minimising her problems with the cult of royal family who are weird

  47. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    I agree completely @Donna, that “Who cares what is the catalyst as long as the reaction takes place”!

    But for the remainder of ur post lets agree there is little basis for agreement.

    I would be the one naive, blind and deaf to believe “most people are moved in a rational manner.”

    There are few rational reasons to elect a lying, cheating, corrupt politician … yet it’s basically guaranteed for Presidential and PM roles!

    Simialarly you find clear rational behaviour in previoua remaining attachment to England as “racist policies [may be] explained away because of the complexities of international relations” or due to “oversights”!

    Yet in your view the straw that will break the back of this resilient scourge of racism is the type of scurrilous remark heard by ALL of us (in various ways) in our own mixed race families.

    That is NOT to condone the obvious and inherent racism but simply to say: Let’s Get Real.

    Bill Clinton made racist remarks (condescending and deeply prejudiced) re Barack Obama … but that was a catalyst for nothing.

    Philando Castile, George Floyd, Tamir Rice and too many other brothers were killed in very racially charged circumstances in the last several years… and although those many deaths were cataclysmic events, yet that “real discussion” is still truly pending.

    As noted I remain amused (and bewildered) that THIS “thing has caused a rethink in former colonies far and wide”…. despite ALL that has gone before in Commonwealth history.

    I am an eternal optimist and never am afraid to hope for better but I also am a REALIST … So if you and others determine that this American lass, the son of the much maligned Princess Diana and their off-spring will truly disrupt the debate on the racial divide then “Who cares what is the catalyst as long as the reaction takes place”.


  48. Windsor Castle Ghost.

    History came back to bite Elizabeth on de Ass. It ain’t the ghost of Dodi Fayed, it was her own genes….


  49. Here’s how it works.

    It goes back centuries, millennia.

    Monarchs, are supposed to be ordained of God from whom they are supposed to get their authority.

    They are supposed to stand apart from the common man.

    Bluebloods if you like.

    They cannot be seen to have deliberately lied to God and divorce is the most obvious proof that they have.

    It can’t be hidden because the act of taking the marriage vow is a matter of public record.

    Monarchs are held to higher standards than “ordinary” mortals.

    Megan supposedly aspired to enter the royal family by marrying a man who in theory could one day have been king despite the fact that he batted way down the order.

    But she did not understand what it entailed, either too dumb or too self absorbed.

    Go look at divorced Wallis Simpson and the then future King of England and see what happened and how it worked out for them.

    They didn’t and couldn’t begat any princesses or princes and Edward opened the batting.

    Anyone entering those echelons better had not be clearly “soiled goods”.

    That’s not to say that monarchs are any pure and unsoiled beings, just that there better not be proof positive.

    Look at Henry VIII.

    He had to create a whole new church to allow him to get a divorce.

    He became divorced and perhaps he was always licentious, the best example of soiled goods in the monarchy EXCEPT, he did not bring it to the monarchy.

    He did not get crowned before God as “soiled goods” for all his subjects to see.

    He just fell by the wayside spectacularly AFTER he became King.

    The only “virgin” or supposed virgin who was a monarch was of course Queen Elizabeth the first, known as the “Virgin Queen”.

    From her we get the name of one of the states of the United States of America.

    For the simpletons among us, that would be Virginia, named in her honour.

    Soiled goods have little to do with virginity where monarchs are concerned and we are talking about monarchs.

    It may be true that soiled goods may not be virgins, but its more about the inability of the soiled good to appear unsoiled without there being proof positive that they are.

    Virginity is just something that might accompany the status of soiled goods.

    Besides, Monarchs are supposed to create a line of succession which is not possible if they maintain their virginity to death.

    But clearly, not all simpletons can figure that out.

    Some, like monarchs, are “created” unequal.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading