← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama

We write as the New York Times has finally found damning evidence that Donald Trump is not the billionaire, successful businessman, he has always presented himself to be – some of us were long aware of this. He may be nearer to being a tax cheat. On the other side of the electoral ledger, Trump has fortuitously found Amy Barrett to buttress his position when (not if) the elections are thrown into the Supreme Court.

Currently, a range of polls have Joe Biden leading almost everywhere. Nationally, he leads Trump by between eight (8) and ten (10) points. In the six (6) to eight (8) battleground states, Biden has leads greater than the margins of error in about five (5) to six (6) of them. Trump leads in one (1) or two (2) and there are a few where there are statistical ties. There is some significant enlargement of the electoral map (battleground states) as states like Texas and Georgia beckon as if ‘fool’s gold’ for Democrats. These are where every election is won or lost.

Presidential elections in America, in recent times – yes, but throughout their history, have been bedevilled by all manner of fraud – on all sides, at different times, but particularly by Republicans, currently, so as to compensate for being the less populace of the two major parties, which it has become. Exit polling, the gold standard for elections, as the highly reliable measure for predicting outcomes and detecting fraud have often failed to avoid the opposite results within the American context. Unlike pre-election polling, no guesswork is required for exit polling which is globally deployed.

In the 2000 presidential elections George Bush, number two (2), was able to defeat Al Gore when the Supreme Court, which Trump has now stacked with loyalists, intervened and threw the elections to Bush. Of course, the Florida Republican Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, had already prepared the ground by removing tens of thousands of Afrikan-American voters from the rolls in strategic areas – they could not vote. If you were Black, with a criminal record, and your name was Brown all the Browns in your immediate areas were therewith removed from the voter rolls. This remains a central Republican voter suppression tactic.

This preparation of the battleground, as if for war, has been, all this time, going on behind the scenes by well-paid soldiers who know that their boss, Trump, never wants to be seen as a ‘loser’. Trump as the out-and-out fraudster and well aware of all the historic electoral shenanigans will be hard to be persuaded by what he sees as meaningless traditions. It should not be doubted that new systems of election rigging are being hatched as an ongoing project.

Trump should be believed when he contends that the only way he could lose is if the elections were unfair. We must see his attempts to manipulate the postal system; his inordinate control over Republican governors, like Ron DeSantis in Florida, a battleground state; and in the absence of a possible clear defeat, the reliability of a Supreme Court to appoint him, an easy ask. We concede though, that the court may not be as dependable as he would like it to be.

The 2004 elections were stolen based on electronic manipulation by George Bush or people acting on his behalf – essentially Karl Rove, who Bush called the ‘architect’. Rove and his fellow architects, again in Florida, were able to program voter machines so that votes for John Kerry were recognized, by the machines, as votes for Bush.

In Ohio, Ken Blackwell, a Black republican and former mayor of Cincinnati, oversaw the same kinds of built-in irregularities in certain counties as he certified numbers of electors inconsistent with actual registered voters. Bush’s approval ratings days before the election was 48%, with political momentum going against him. Normally when an incumbent president is below 50% he/she tends to lose. But Bush ‘won’ 51-48% in Ohio as the voting machines supplied by republican outfits included Diebold Election Systems, Inc. (DESI), Election Systems & Software (ESS) and Sequoia Voting Systems did the job intended. These are the companies which conspired with Karl Rove to steal two elections in a row and were the suppliers of 80% of all voting machines within the USA.

Notwithstanding the underlying election fraud by Bush, CNN had called the 2004 election for Kerry. But soon after and based on one of sixteen statistical impossibilities, a few thousand additional votes produced a five (5) point swing for Bush. This was also inconsistent with the exit polling results in the decisive states of Florida and Ohio. CNN then reversed itself and began calling the elections for Bush instead of Kerry. This action wiped out Kerry’s three (3) percentage points lead which he had gained up to 01:36 am and had Bush now leading by 2 percentage points in Florida. Only in America!

Pennsylvania also played a similar role in these fraudulent 2004 elections.

Enter Mitt Romney, and the 2012 elections, with Barack Obama seeking a second term. Romney comes along with the serial election fraudster Karl Rove. Maybe it was John McCain, given the man which he was said to be, who declined to participate in an election fraud against Obama in 2008. Donald Trump could never be depended upon to behave in such ways. History may indeed show that McCain created a break in the historic fraudulence of Karl Rove during the 2008 presidential elections – Obama v McCain.

Readers may recall Karl Rove, appearing on Fox News as commentator, in the 2012 elections, delaying a concession long after all indications were that Obama was being projected to be the winner of Ohio and thus would have garnered the 270 electoral votes to be the next president. Rove knew something only few others would have known.

It was Willian Skinner who alerted us about a report in the press concerning a motley group of hackers who were claiming to have discovered the planned electronic theft of Karl Rove and his associates and succeeded in blocking them, putting Rove’s agents into an electronic trap. As a result we are left to presume that Rove’s actions coupled with Romney’s long delayed concession was their way of giving the hidden and fraudulent hands more time to manifest this massive election fraud once more.

As we approach the first question and answer session on Tuesday (these could hardly pass for debates) Trump will see them as an opportunity to destroy Biden using his belligerent, uncouth, style. Biden’s handlers will be happy if they can get him out of there with at least a credible draw. There will be hardly any machinations, hopes, about winning given the damaged goods with which they have been handed. However, for Trump, less so than for Biden, the real game is taking place elsewhere and conducted by the forces of darkness from whence the whole panoply of American electoral fraud will be in a heightened state of readiness.

We have estimated that even if Joe Biden were to win the popular vote, win the Electoral College by a significant margin, win the exit polling, have all major media projecting him as the winner, by some chance have the Supreme Court declare him as winner, these will not be enough to convince Donald Trump that he is indeed anything less than the winner. Biden will then have to get Trump to concede and exit the White House, still. A dependence of the military brass is ill-advised. These may prove more difficult than winning the election as Trump has already prepared a case indicting the Democrats for engaging in massive election fraud. And as irrational as that maybe, we’ve seen this play reenacted for four years, Trump winning more often than not.

Biden the dependable nationalist, like Al Gore and John Kerry before him, may even find a way to capture defeat from the jaws of victory in order to preserve the republic and avoid a decent into civil unrest, even if the Supreme Court acted in his favour and against an adamant Donald Trump.

Of course, there will be demonstrations in the street regardless of final outcome..

There can be no daylight between the high-handed nomination of Amy Barrett and the election fraud being perpetrated by Donald J. Trump and those acting on his behalf. As this looming crisis to empire takes us on a slow march to a near unavoidable disaster it maybe high time for American policymakers to rethink all the structures on which this experiment was constructed. Certainly, an ‘exceptional nation’ should not have produced a Donald Trump, let alone have him elevated to the seat of power. A power position which then transforms a fraudster into a neo-fascist with the perceived power to say who, in the case of Venezuela, is to be that country’s president. The power of the presidency may be the one thing keeping Trump out of jail, Should he lose all bets are off. And Trump knows this too well.

Strengthened by the fraudulence of empire he can now do to America what the United States has for two hundred and fifty (250) years done to the rest of the world. One man, Donald J. Trump, has in a mere four (4) years done more damage to the United States of America than all the armies ever seen and not even a thousand Joe Bidens could recover it.



Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

1,186 responses to “How Donald Trump is Stealing the 2020 Presidential Elections”


  1. Wonder what Trump’s election bankroller Mercer thinks about the debate.


  2. Hal AustinOctober 1, 2020 10:39 AM

    A Christian is an individual and has an individual relationship with God…..(Quote)

    Wrong. This is Enlightenment individualist nonsense. A commitment to God is a public act, not a private contract. You go out in to the highways and hedges and preach the gospel, not whisper to your pillow.
    The sacrament symbolises an outward commitment to God and sends a message to friends and neighbours of that inner commitment. We do not do secret/private deals with God.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    No Hal, you are wrong.

    The public acts follow and are based on the initial private act.

    That’s why in the Bible Baptism follows acceptance.

    Read about the Ethiopian Eunuch and Philip.

    The journey starts with faith.

    .https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%208%3A26-40&version=KJV

    37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

    38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.

    39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.


  3. ….. believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God

    …… and he baptized him

    ….. and he went on his way rejoicing.

    ABC


  4. Act of Faith – Private

    Baptism – Public

    Celebration – Public


  5. @ Quaker John

    By definition, faith is an inner belief and so can only take place within the mind. So, I may have sympathies for fascism or capitalism or Marxism. At this stage, that is a matter for me and Freud.
    Once I make the next step to put that sympathy in to action, faith, or belief, I do so publicly in some form. My belief therefore become public as a Fascist, capitalist, or Roman Catholic, etc. Christianity is a public expression of belief.
    Religion is a public expression. It was only with the Enlightenment that we got the concept of individualism. Even now, aft er 250 years, there is still conflict between individualism and our collective acts.
    @Quaker John, you are bluffing again. You know nothing about Enlightenment philosophy.


  6. In the 1700’s, Earthquake in Portugal, 1755.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1755_Lisbon_earthquake

    Bible is a bit older!!


  7. Sea level rose in Carlisle Bay as a result of the earthquake in Portugal.

    Check Schomburgk


  8. “Philosophy

    Allegory of the 1755 Earthquake, by João Glama Strobërle (who depicted himself standing on a pile of rubble on the lower-right corner). In the upper-left corner is an angel holding a fiery sword, personifying divine judgement.
    The earthquake and its aftermath strongly influenced the intelligentsia of the European Age of Enlightenment. The noted writer-philosopher Voltaire used the earthquake in Candide and in his Poème sur le désastre de Lisbonne (“Poem on the Lisbon disaster”). Voltaire’s Candide attacks the notion that all is for the best in this, “the best of all possible worlds”, a world closely supervised by a benevolent deity. The Lisbon disaster provided a counterexample. As Theodor Adorno wrote, “[t]he earthquake of Lisbon sufficed to cure Voltaire of the theodicy of Leibniz” (Negative Dialectics 361). Jean-Jacques Rousseau was also influenced by the devastation following the earthquake, whose severity he believed was due to too many people living within the close quarters of the city. Rousseau used the earthquake as an argument against cities as part of his desire for a more naturalistic way of life.[21]”


  9. Portugal, given half the world by the Pope, never recovered.


  10. It is the first private individual moment between the believer and God that marks him/her..

    That’s the foundation.

    Fascism, Communism, Socialism are terrified by the individual.

    God’s power far outweighs any power a Fascist/Communist/Socialist state might wield.

    They instinctively know to be fearful.


  11. The earthquake in Portugal tested people’s faith.


  12. So the question is, Do I know anything about Enlightnmet?

    The answer is a question!!!

    Do I need to?


  13. You should look at another period in country which followed the Age of Enlightenment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Great_Awakening


  14. Donna, it is beneath you and others that cry Racism with absolutely no proof!


  15. Hal

    For what its worth!!


  16. All of the major news outlets are calling a major win for Biden, after the debate.

    They are calling Trump’s behaviour that of a petulant child.

    Some people have realised that Trump is senile, that is why he can only shout and make childish claims, such as ranting almost incoherently about Biden’s sons. He cannot process thoughts on more complex policy matters, so he avoids it.

    Yes, Trump is going senile.


  17. So if Biden won the first debate, why is the press seeking to have the other two canceled?


  18. “Tuesday night’s so-called debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden was seen by a whopping 73.1 million viewers Tuesday, according to Nielsen. That’s a huge number— more than triple the audience of this year’s Oscars— but it wasn’t quite the blockbuster as the first debate of the 2016 general election. That Trump versus Hillary Clinton opening slugfest drew a record 84 million viewers.”

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    So why would the press not want to capitalise on this tremendous viewership?


  19. Trump’s Army


  20. When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time…. Maya Angelou


  21. That Trump’s campaign is rooted in racism is painfully obvious. You back Trump. Also you spout every racist argument I have ever heard. You could even find an excuse for George Zimmerman to kill Trayvon Martin. Whether you know it or not, you are a racist. Your words convict you.

    However, you can find absolutely nothing I have posted that suggests I “interfere” with little girls. If you can find anything please feel free to post it so we all can have a look you, foolish little man.


  22. Misplaced comma


  23. No, Lawson. We are finally thinking for ourselves. That is why we decide for ourselves what is good for us and not your white ass.

    What Trump has offered will not fix the real systemic problems. I am sure he knows that. It is just an attempt to syphon off the few votes he needs to get re-elected.


  24. What is the sense of supporting black colleges if you are encouraging police and white vigilantes and to shoot the same black people in the back and put their knees on their necks without cause? What is the sense when you push for stop and frisk of the same black people when they are on their way to classes? What is the sense when you embolden white supremacists to persecute black people just trying to live their lives? What is the sense when you are degrading black people at every turn and making them feel less than? How many are going to make it to those colleges?

    Stupse!

    You really think we are falling for that shit???

  25. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @John
    “So if Biden won the first debate, why is the press seeking to have the other two canceled?”

    Because he might not win the second or third. Best to quit when you are ahead. The real race is won on election day. There is ZERO benefit for JB to debate, only risks, against a guy like DT.


  26. I would love to see another debate, as long as the moderator has a mute button for the microphones.

    Funny how the Trumpists said Biden wasn’t going to show up for the first debate.

    But he would have good reason not to show up for the second unless there is a mute button for Trump.

    Me? I would show up and let Trump interrupt me all night. That is bound to turn off the undecided.


  27. @David October 1, 2020 5:55 AM “Let us hear it for the Pope!”

    Glad that the Pope knows who is the boss.


  28. It turns out now that the international chairman of “Proud Boys” is black and he is running for congress.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/30/wilfred-reilly-insists-proud-boys-arent-white-supr/

    “It turns out not everybody believes the Proud Boys are white supremacists, including a prominent Black professor at a historically Black university.

    Wilfred Reilly, associate professor of political science at Kentucky State University, said Wednesday that “the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacists,” describing the right-wing group’s beliefs as “Western chauvinist” and noting that their international chairman, Enrique Tarrio, is Black.

    “Gotta say: the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacists,” tweeted Mr. Reilly, author of “Hate Crime Hoax.””

    Just another hoax practiced on a bunch of stupid idiots on BU who can’t think for themselves by Joe Biden, Sarge, Pachamama David etc …. “The Jussie Smollett crew”!!!

    Do you understand now what sort of IQ Trump has … and what sort of IQ the Jussie Smollet Crew has?

    By asking Chris Wallace to be specific he put him on the spot.

    Chris Wallace realised immediately his neck was out and cut the segment.

    Foolish Joe Biden provided the name, Proud Boys!!!!

    More foolish Sarge, Pachamama etc swallowed the gaffe hook line and sinker.

    Trump is some kind of genius.

    The Jussie Smollett crew, …. well they are just the Jussie Smollett Crew.

    They will never change.


  29. Here is the leader of the Proud Boys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  30. This is priceless!!


  31. John you liar. The founder of Proud sweet Boys is Gavin NcInniss he is white. The one you referenced is a member. NOT black He is a latino, one of those warped coconut Cuban far right who hate Cuba so much that they conspire with anything non Cuban.

    It was one of those far right Cuban terrorists, from prior Cuban mafia families, who blew up the Cuban plane years ago.

    You are a liar.


  32. Seen that “proud boy” months ago. Didn’t bother to mention it because it makes no difference. You ain’t white either and you are still frontman for the racists.

    I have a feeling that he meant the Boogaloo Boys, though.

    The sentiment remains the same. Trump would not condemn white supremacists. If, as he said, he did not know who they were, that means he did not know that they weren’t white supremacists.

    That ain’t gonna fly.

    P.S. Such hero worship by a grown man is embarassing. My brain damage theory is the only explanation I can come up with.


  33. So Crusoe,

    What is the difference between the founder and the leader?


  34. And Crusoe you are correct. Not black at all. And the Cubans who fled Cuba were mostly the privileged who lost their privileges. That accounts for the bitterness that warps their minds.

    And isn’t it funny how these clowns find one black man and use his word as gospel?

    John is embarassing. No better than Looney Tunes, really.


  35. DonnaOctober 1, 2020 7:25 PM

    I have a feeling that he meant the Boogaloo Boys, though.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    So, what’s the membership of this group like?

    Will it fit in a phone booth like the membership of the Proud Boys?


  36. But one thing, though – you can be black AND Latino.



  37. How many boys does it take to kill one black man?


  38. DonnaOctober 1, 2020 7:39 PM

    But one thing, though – you can be black AND Latino.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Can you be white and Latino?


  39. Yup! Latino is not a race.


  40. So you would support Joe Biden’s position that the Latino community is far more diverse than the African American one


  41. Poor John! Clutching at straws! His attempt to paint the Proud Boys as fine upstanding citizens who can’t be racist because their leader is black has failed miserably. Led astray by some suspect reporting he presents a man who describes himself as a right- wing Latino as the black leader of “proud boys”.

    If he was a student of history as he claims to be; he would know that many people promote causes or join groups that they should be diametrically opposed to e.g. Jews in Hitler’s army. In any event Proud boys are just one of many racist groups that have been given new life in the age of Trump, even David Duke leader of the sill standing KKK said that Trump speaks his language.


  42. Sarge

    All I am trying to do is to help Donna to a position where she can call Joe Biden a racist so MB doesn’t cast aspirations on her upright character.



  43. ,,, and from 2016, the same Chris Wallace asked the same question and got an answer he somehow swwms to have forgotten!!

    Is it him or Joe Biden that is senile?

    https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2020-10-01-watch-trump-disavowed-white-supremacists-to-chris-wallaces-face-in-2016/


  44. seems


  45. Are you perhaps as senile as Chris Wallace and Joe?


  46. Only the best people work at the WH. Today Kayleigh McEnany (Trump’s Press Secretary) described the latest Supreme Court pick as a Rhodes Scholar, trouble is she is not a “Rhodes Scholar” she attended Rhodes College.

    I know that I am entitled to some plaudits, I walked a lot of roads in Bim, I should be described as a “Roads Scholar”.


  47. The problem is the media and Chris Wallace are desperate.

    They know Trump should win in a landslide.

    … any child would know that.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading