Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by PUDRYR

Well it finally had to happen and CHIEF JUSTICE MARSTON GIBSON’s known competencies, or renown incompetencies had to come to the surface or, as bajans say, “day has run, till night catch it”. Here is the matter in a nutshell.

The City of Bridgetown Credit Union made a qualified loan to Mr. Morris Lee and some family members. They were all members in good standing with the credit union BUT FATE WOULD HAVE IT, because a certain CEO, had his eye on Lee’s properties, it is purported that he directed THAT THE SECURITIES FOR THE LOANS were to be (a) Lee’s Minibuses, (b) a house and land, (c) and apartment building  and (d) ½ acre of land all valued at roughly $5.2M which was TWICE THE AMOUNT OF THE LOAN secured.

But what is really disturbing is that “the assets that were used to collateralize the loan”, WERE NOT THE PROPERTY OF THE MEMBERS WHICH THE CREDIT UNION GAVE THE LOANS TO. Yes sireeeee, Steve Belle and his ingrunt CoB lawyers, securitized the man loan with assets of private companies!

Now let me explain to wunna people cause wunna is not idjits how this works. The CoB can lend money to its members, AS WELL AS “bodies corporate”. BUT THESE BODIES CORPORATE have to become members of the Credit union. IN LEE’s CASE, THIS STEP WAS NEVER DONE so what happened was that while there were 4 companies involved in the loan transaction, Lee’s bus company and 3 real estate companies, NOT ONE WAS MADE A MEMBER! Well once wunna understand the above backstory, wunna is up to speed with all the background CoB trickery in this matter.

Now let us deal with the incompetence of CHIEF JUSTICE MARSTON. It would appear that the Chief Justice HAS BEEN MAKING SOME REAL BIG INGRUNT MISTAKES.

Illegal Orders to repossess the incorrectly listed assets of the 4 non credut union companies, were given to the court by Court Master Debra Holder. She did not listen to TO THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY MR. LEE who told her that CoB had not properly securitized the loans.

One further detail for all readers. Wunna remember a man called Ernest Jackman, the lawyer who always getting lock up for client funds? He was Lee’s lawyer and he was doing some of his famous underhand tricks but we will return to that.

So now, when the illegal order gets executed on the assets THAT WERE NOT LEGALLY SECURED, Steve Belle CEO of CoB, gives instruction to get the various assets repossessed. These  included 6 buses and 2 SUVs which Steve claimed “were all inoperable at the time of repossession” ALL OF THEM!

Now here is another joke. Even though the bailiffs drove these vehicles away from the bus stands, WITH POLICE ESCORTS, (and wunna dun know that the Royal Barbados Police Force does only arrest poor black people cause Tasker still free and Innes she still free) Steve say that they were inoperable cause he can auction them off cheap. Lee approached the impotent CJ for an approval for the injunction concerning CoB Credit Union cases CV993/2016 and CV994/2016 to be heard as an urgent matter. And the CJ so orders an urgent hearing on 15th March 2019

The same impotent CJ Marston sends the matter to Dr. Sonia Richards and she refuses to hear it and returns the item to the CJ, without explanation. Even though he is Chief Justice what has happened over the last 4 months, is that all his instructions to 2 judges, to hear the matter on an Injunction with Urgency have been ignored by his subordinates.

By now, all of you readers can see why this submission has the word IMPOTENT because the CJ is so ineffectual that HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT OTHER STEPS HE CAN TAKE IN THIS MATTER. The man is really just “winging it”. It is obvious there is no respect for this man and if MARSTON IS TO BE FIRED, THIS MATTER SHOULD BE THE INCIDENT THAT CUASES THIS TO HAPPEN.

Chief Justice Marston Gibson IS A POOH POOH MAN!

Wunna all unnerstan whu happen so far?

  1. In simple terms City of Bridgetown did not securitize their loans properly to their loan recipients.
  2. They gave loans but the security DID NOT BELONG TO DE PEOPLE THEY GAVE THE LOANS TO.
  3. The assets belonged to 4 non member companies.
  4. When Justice Debra Holder gave CoB the Court Order she erred in that action big time!
  5. Lee and his family rightfully sought to appeal said incorrect Court Order
  6. The CHIEF JUSTICE agreed that his matter had merit for urgent consideration
  7. Marston’s subordinates refused to carry out his instructions for 4 months
  8. During this time, Steve Belle and the City of Bridgetown is using its agents, the Royal Barbados Police Force, the Court Marshalls, the external lawyers, to ride roughshod over Mr. Lee

None of you will believe this but Steve Belle, CEO of CoB, up on the trucks dat are now repossessing properties that ARE NOT THEIRS UNDER THE LAWS OF BARBADOS and taking people’s contents to the St Thomas landfill.

Yes siree, Steve Belle got a bolt cutters and drilling machine and drilling out people locks WHILE PROTECTED BY THE COURT MARSHALLS who say dat “Marston is a boy in de yard and that “they are acting upon an authority that is higher than he!” Which has to be Attorney General, or the Governor General, or the Prime Minister.

Look what Barbados has come to – the criminals are killing us in the streets and the other criminals are killing us through the Court.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

394 responses to “Is the Chief Justice Marston Gibson IMPOTENT?”


  1. There was an item on the 12.30 VOB news about a Commision to look into the Administration of the parishes to be led by Ralph Thorne.Another study, however,I am all for a return to a parochial form of administration or government and a reduction of ministers to 8.Its unacceptable to expect a Minister of the Crown to find the time to devote to garbage collection,bus service etc and the many woes John Public experiences on a daily basis.Reduce the number of ministers and go back to a form of local government.Its not going to be the panacea for all our problems but one should be able to see the councillor more readily than what obtains today.What we have now is too many hands making light of the work ethic and laying on the taxes like layers of onion skin.

  2. WURA-WAR-on-U Avatar

    Well UK needs to first remove that shite crown that is and HAS BEEN MISUSED and ABUSED by their house negros for so long that all they will ever get going forward is embarrassment after embarrassment from the MONSTERS UK CREATED..the pretend black elites….in the last 70+ years…

    that is the FIRST MOVE..

    but who knows, maybe they like the embarrassment…what do i know, lol….i like the entertainment..


  3. @ All

    The Iraqi Supergun started life at the Barbados Foundry in the mid 1960s the HARP Project, under the supervision of Dr Gerald Bull, a Canadian. The HARP Project, based at Seawell, next to the airport, was talked of as an air defence weapon. (Google it).
    At some point in the early 1970s it was moved to Antigua. I know nothing about its Antiguan developments, but by the 1980s, it was talked about as the Iraqi Supergun, until Dr Bull met his untimely death, it is alleged, at the hands of Israel’s Mossad (books have been written on the subject). It was never an Israeli gun. Israel’s only involvement was the theoretical threat it posed to its security.
    Second, the 15 shrimp trawlers that were based in the Careenage fished in the Gulf. As far as I know, people still eat shrimp, so, it can be assumed, for whatever reason, we lost the trawlers and industry. The value of shares at its collapse is irrelevant.
    As to Barrow’s contribution to the development of the nation, of course he made a huge contribution. BUT HE WAS NOT THE FATHER OF INDEPENDENCE. The evidence is there in the Library of Congress and the National Archives in the UK. (A good read on this is Benn Steil’s The Battle of Bretton Woods).
    We also know the blueprint for Caribbean independence was discussed in the UK parliament in 1960s(see Hansard). Sir Henry Forde took part n the independence discussions, so our media should interview him. Views on Barrow are subjective, nether here or there. The facts speak for themselves and the Barbados Advocate archives are there to be looked at.

    @ Tron
    You are right about a lot of Barrow’s vanity project: so-called free education is one. At first free secondary education was meant to be secondary education (there was no problem at the time), it has now become a hugely expensive university education, which even the US cannot afford.
    The 1961 Barrow government benefited from two major Adams’ projects: the Deep Water Harbour and QEH. Barrow filled in the Careenage and Constitution river, which at the time I supported. On reflection both were bad decisions. And, I have listed some of the other big ideas he had which never came off. Barrow was the architect of our decline.
    .The British Library, newspaper section (the Old newspaper library) has a comprehensive collection of all Barbados newspapers from the 1950s and 60s. Read them.

  4. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Hal

    It’s extremely amazing that those now presenting that the welfare state needs to be eradicated and that the “masses” want everything free are the same ones who a year ago were critical of Stuart when the students were asked to cover a percentage of their university fees. As a matter of fact the current party in office had the restoring of these fees as a central part of its election platform.
    This is another clear indication that it is a waste of time to even engage these cool aid drinkers in any serious debate.
    Indeed it was said that touching free education was killing everything for which Barrow stood.
    As you know I have long maintained that Frank Walcott , Wynter Crawford and others should be revered as much as Barrow.
    There is another myth going around about how great local government was and trying to elevate some rather interesting characters.
    It would have been interesting if conversations were held as to what really transpired under local government but that too will be revealed in the fullness of time.
    Corruption has been around for a very long time in this country and there were many beneficiaries.

    The Duopoly Rules


  5. @ William,

    What I find amazing is the reluctance of people to go to the archives in Black Rock and do the research. The evidence is all there.


  6. Stuart was a blight on the land for 9 long years. He has been deposited into the political dustbin where he belongs with the rest of his kind.

  7. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ David
    I was merely stating that Stuart was criticized for making students pay university fees. He was criticized by those who are now claiming that the “welfare state “ needs to be dismantled and that the people like too much freeness. It clearly shows that the cool aid drinkers in the BLPDLP are not to be taken seriously. I agree wholeheartedly with your comment about Stuart . Please read carefully because it was not an attempt on my part to be in anyway positive toward Stuart.
    Thank you , Sir!
    The Duopoly Rules.
    @ Hal
    Nobody wants to deal with facts. Why do you think that the airport was named after Adams and not the Deepwater Harbour?
    Why do you think that Wynter Crawford is not mentioned about being a progressive champion of the poor?
    Do we have any real idea of the felicities that occurred under so-called local government?
    Do we know who amassed considerable wealth during that period?
    The Duopoly Rules

  8. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Hal
    The major problem with local government is that it will not escape the skullduggery that is going on now. We will find the same political yardfowlism rampant and the bureaucracy will attract the same thing that happens on Boards.
    To institute any form of local government without changing the current political culture is essentially self defeating.
    It will be nothing more than a sophisticated facade of the constituency councils.
    These two parties are inherently corrupt and no “sweet talk “ can change that!
    The Duopoly Rules


  9. @William

    The point raw as it was is that Stuart policies would never have resonated because he nor his government understood how to communicate with its public.


  10. @ William,

    Did you see the launch of the Thorne Commission report? Did you see the prime minister taking control, interrupting Thorne and Commissiong when they were speaking? It is the God complex.
    We need a proper local government system, but the president has already limited any proposed new system. Is she just re-iocal government in homage to her grand father? Why was Commissiong on the commission?

  11. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    It really is amazing that the problems that clearly need to be addressed are being ignored and non issues are gaining attention. On an island 21 miles long and 14 miles wide do we need Parish Councils ? To do what? Another layer of ineffective bureaucracy?


  12. @Vincent

    Do you agree we need a governance system that will encourage greater people participation?

  13. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    David Bu

    No. We do not. Even if we did ,would you outline to me how Parish Councils will encourage greater people participation.? Do we need talk or effective delivery of public goods and services? Are you telling me you do not know what these are?


  14. Who better to deliver effective public delivery than the people taking ownership at the retail level?

    #askingforafriend

  15. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Hal
    It’s Crop Over………what can I say .

    The Duopoly Rules

  16. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    David BU

    Ownership of what? And what retail level are you talking about? Please elaborate? What is it you are selling in smaller portions?


  17. Who better to deliver effective public delivery than the people taking ownership at the retail level?
    #askingforafriend(Quote)

    Help. I am drowning. The ability to think is a gift.

  18. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    Please tell your friend to come and talk for himself. Something is missing in translation.


  19. @Vincent

    Do you agree the system we have is failing?

    If yes do agree to make it work we have to make changes to same system?

    Waiting for you Vincent 🙂

  20. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU

    No. People are failing the system.

  21. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    David BU

    You are about to move the goal posts again. How will Parochial Councils lead to greater public participation in the governance system?


  22. @ Vincent.

    I agree with you there, it’s those in authority that are failing the system in several sectors.

    There is no shortage of systems and rules in this island, there is however a severe shortage of compliance and consequence.


  23. @ Vincent Codrington July 10, 2019 3:22 PM
    “It really is amazing that the problems that clearly need to be addressed are being ignored and non issues are gaining attention. On an island 21 miles long and 14 miles wide do we need Parish Councils ? To do what? Another layer of ineffective bureaucracy?”
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Well said, just another costly layer of bureaucracy to be imposed on a 2×3 island that a jet plane can fly over in less than a minute.

    Why would a set of incompetent ‘visionless’ politicians dream up such schemes of costly pork-barrel type form of governance when the world is going digital with nearly every going function online especially in the area of communications?

    Weren’t the SOE’s set up to deliver goods and services to the public which the central bureaucracy could not do effectively?
    Now look at what the country is saddled with?

    Before this lot of nincompoops start talking from their ‘NATO’ empty heads let them demonstrate their basic competencies (skill sets) by embarking on an ongoing campaign which would oversee the removal of the detritus and waste (including derelict vehicles) from the roads and verges along with the unsightly garbage which accumulates for weeks at the country’s beaches and becomes a major turnoff to both visitors and those locals with a touch of class and concern about public hygiene.


  24. @Vincent

    To repeat the point, if elected officials in the current system are failing the people what do you suggest should be done to fire up greater citizen participation and advocacy.


  25. @ david.

    I got to tell you in my view this parish council thing is utter foolishness. We already have 30 ministers in a population of 275000. That is one of the highest rates of ministers per capita anywhere in the region.

    All the parish councils will do is put a barrier between the public and those appointed to serve. Instead therefore of the ministers being hands on, they will now be referring things down via these councils. All it will do is create opportunities for misunderstanding as issues could be misinterpreted in transfer via a council.

    We need to simplify communications not complicate them further.


  26. @ Vincent

    Barbados is 14×21, 300000 people, a parliament of 30 representatives (one per 10000 people); let us assume that of the 12 parishes we appointed/elected a council of ten people, giving us 150 elected representatives (one per 2000 people), and 25000 civil/public servants (one decision-maker per 12 people) – you see where I am going?
    Are these councillors going to be paid? Good government is about policies, not numbers. Tell the people in the Pine they need one decision-maker for every 12 people to get things done.


  27. @John A

    The issue here is about jump starting a system that has been failing for decades. This is the jump of point we need to analyze. Not interested in the theory. We have to make changes to pull the citizens in the process. At this point they have become detached for whatever reason.


  28. @ David

    So how creating another level of political yarn will draw them closer to the system? What needs to happen is the 30 ministers need to come down from their thrones and put in place public meetings at venues to speak to and take questions from the public.

    In other words not to mount platforms to proclaim ” how great thou art” accompanied by a wuk up artist and loud music, but a forum for genuine interaction.

    It’s done in other countries why not here. So take some of the money you was going spend in this council nonesence and mount an outreach program on a one on, using a face to face format.


  29. @John A

    The blogmaster will wait in the details. The point is our governance system is not fit for purpose and a draconian intervention is needed.

  30. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU at 4 :17 PM

    I have no need to” fire up greater citizen participation and advocacy”. That is anarchy. I chose to live in a democracy and I expect those, charged with the responsibilities to deliver public goods and services ,to do so within the ambit of the current system of governance. I did not vote for any changes in that system.


  31. @Vincent

    It is your right to go with the flow.


  32. You feel you could go to either one of these council heads and get a straight answer? You will be told “let me get back to you.” Meaning let me check with the minister first and see what he say.

    No bring the dam minister onetime to a format where I can ask him directly, I don’t need no errand boy to carry my message. You wanted my vote well come and answer my questions face to face! Don’t hide behind no council when it come to difficult issues.


  33. @John A

    What is your understanding of the mandate of these proposed parish assemblies?


  34. I done see what the plan is here and this is a step back not forward. It’s a classic ploy of creating a barrier and safety net between the policy makers and public, when in fact the opposite is needed.


  35. @David

    Each parish has a representative already with some having more than I correct?

    Each representative has a constituency office paid for out the public purse correct?

    Each constituency office is supposed to be staffed and open daily for the public to avail correct?

    So pray tell what opening another office 2 houses down and calling it ” the parish councel” going do?

    Address the issues and come to the public in a format where you can be questioned. Make yourself available in other words. We don’t need another level of red tape and government hindrances standing between us and answers.

    Oh and I got a question. What is the status on the foreign debt restructuring? Start with answering that and left out the smoke and mirrors.


  36. @John A

    To repeat the comment will keep an open mind to see how the PM plans to devolve some of the powers of the office.

  37. Vincent Codrington Avatar
    Vincent Codrington

    @ David BU
    Why is it that ideas backed up by sound logic and historical proof of effectiveness is theory, while old ideas that were proven to be inefficient and ineffective are being recycled as solutions? We went that route before and it was judged irrelevant.

    Your stating that it is not fit for purpose is empty. Are you trying to convince yourself. Do you have a purpose that cannot be disclosed.? Tell us what this purpose is .


  38. @Vincent

    Not knocking your view, simply countering with the position that the governance system has failed us for decades.


  39. @ David July 10, 2019 4:27 PM
    “the jump of point we need to analyze. Not interested in the theory. We have to make changes to pull the citizens in the process. At this point they have become detached for whatever reason.”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

    The proof of the pudding (governance pie) is in the eating (implementation).

    Don’t you see that this BLP-styled proposal is just another incarnation of the ‘failed’ DLP constituency Councils?

    Barbados does not need more government but a leaner, more effective form of governance machinery.

    Why is the current BLP trying to find work for the 15 odd idle hands snoozing in the Cabinet?

    Why are they trying to create puppets in some local government circus to micromanage daily?

    Is public administration no longer guided by the principles making up the three ‘E’s”:
    Economy, Efficiency & Effectiveness.

    It would be interesting to see if the IMF approves any funding for such modern-day madness running contrary to the aims and objectives of BERT.

    Or is this just another distraction to the White Oaks lame-duck negotiations?


  40. @ Vincent

    The chairman does not put forward logical arguments; he makes bold statements and readers have to interpret what he means. It is the Bajan condition.


  41. @Miller

    Look forward to participating along with you at the assemblies.

  42. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    David is an unrepentant apologist of the duopoly. Nothing he has written in response to the soon to be reconstituted constituency councils, should surprise anybody , who has been following his positions.

    The Duopoly Rules


  43. I came to this blog to read about the Courts and the COB’s treatment of Mr. Lee. The lack of justice that still exists for some on the island. What happened? David let others hijack Piece’s blog with everything from parish councils, factory closures, to accounting training and maths in schools.


  44. @Miller July 10, 2019 5:01 PM

    The basic problem in Barbados is that people have forgotten how to act and think responsibly. An average citizen can no longer shit into a hole on the beach without the help of the state. Those are the facts.

    The question of how the state could boost the economy shows the intellectual misery all too clearly. It is not the state’s job to play economy. You can see the catastrophic result with state enterprises.

    The state’s task is simply to create favourable conditions for investment: low taxes, good infrastructure, low crime. But the state has failed grandiosely in all these areas.

    We do not need more state, we need much less. I am beginning to have serious doubts about the intelligence of the masses and the bureaucrats. We are in the 12th (!) year with zero growth and they are still dancing around the state like pagans around the golden calf. You notice that they are dependent on the state like drug addicts on heroin or cocaine.

    These clowns still believe there will soon be one or two stinky whites coming to rescue them in the manner of a Massa with new hotel projects. Wrong thought. Tourism produces only badly paid jobs.

    I see no growth and no inflow of foreign currency in the foreseeable future. The decay will continue because the population is still far too arrogant and too blind. Therefore the name “ISO-Taliban” is quite appropriate. The population is as socially backward as the Taliban. The hate tirades about the private life of our beloved Prime Minister could also come from Saudi Arabia or the deepest Afghanistan valley.

    Many of you will now howl again, claiming that Tron is far too hard and insulting. Wrong thought. If we don’t make the diagnosis here, where then? Only in the funeral home of failed nations?


  45. @ Dame Bajans July 10, 2019 5:42 PM

    If we had a little more seriousness in Barbados, they would move the courts back to the old building and turn the new courthouse into a hotel. Marston can play bartender there. At least we would have more foreign currency.

    In view of the impoverishment of the masses and the desolate economy, we don’t need 100 judiciary employees in a far too large building. I’d like to know which mad politician had this idea. It is perverse that the new court building in Barbados is larger than most of the supreme courts in large developed countries for many millions of people.

    If one puts the size of the building in relation to the amount of debt, external observers are no longer surprised why everything is collapsing on the island.


  46. @David

    Surely as Blogmaster you are just stoking debate right?

    In your heart of hearts you cant seriously believe that constituency councils version 2 will benefit anyone beside the usual yard fowls.

    This is yet another indicator that this gov’t is as void of ideas as the last inept administration.

    Barbados is a joke.

    Is Canada looking for any colonies?


  47. David let others hijack Piece’s blog with everything from parish councils, factory closures, to accounting training and maths in schools.*

    Because it ultimately reflects badly on his gov’t?

  48. WURA-WAR-on-U Avatar

    It ain’t collapse yet, just wait…

    get over ya dumb self…ya already know Mia has made so many cockups in the last 12 months, that the only way going forward is DOWN….her master plan blew up on her……lol

    so when is the next plane trip at taxpayer’s expense and where is it to this time…Dubai, Qatar, Mauritania, Sudan, Libya, Egypt, South Africa…..where is next, we can’t wait to hear.

    …ah heard all the local thieves calling themselves elites just love Dubai, why don’t they just go there and stay there..

    know your history…shithead.

    https://face2faceafrica.com/article/africans-barbados-rebelled-slavery-this-day-1816


  49. These clowns still believe there will soon be one or two stinky whites coming to rescue them in the manner of a Massa with new hotel projects. Wrong thought. Tourism produces only badly paid jobs.

    Ha..the old @Tron is back.


  50. @John A
    @Vincent
    @David
    So why don’t you get together and organise regular town hall meetings with members of the public, including members of this blog..? Lobby & invite government ministers along local influencers to attend and discuss/resolve issues.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading