The attached file contains Ms. Atwell’s instruction to the lawyer AND an extract from Ms. Harewood’s affidavit. Is it fair to surmise that she acknowledged at the time of signing that the beach land was not bequeathed to her? The blogmaster is willing to be guided.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I hope my new best friend Enuff sees this and leave it alone.
I am beginning to wonder if anything will come of this exercise…
@ Theophilus Gazerts
let me step up tp the plate and answer that question Theophillus.
To answer I am going to do three things which is best called “congealed eclecticism”
Andrew Simpson on another thread say and I quote “…the challenge is for those in positions of authority – to bridge the gap, using a totally transparent, possibly digital platform that effectively engages this third sector mechanism to develop and to widely share such opportunities…”
Nine of Nines in another blog while speaking about cryptocurrencies states “…It has the ability to be exchanged in secured peer to peer encrypted channels devoid of Governmental/Institutional regulation which might change to satisfy consumer trust….”
This article commences thusly “…The attached file contains Ms. Atwell’s instruction to the lawyer AND an extract from Ms. Harewood’s affidavit. Is it fair to surmise that she acknowledged at the time of signing that the beach land was not bequeathed to her?…”
Now i know that many cannot follow de ole man’s drivel but I know that you can.
The “congealed Eclecticism” that de ole man speaks of is (i) using a totally transparent, digital platform that (ii) uses a secure peer to peer encrypted channel to satisfy consumer trust and (iii) store Ms. Atwell’s instructions to her lawyer at the time of signing records concerning that beach land.
THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE but the Thought Leaders of Chairman Mia Mao OF WHOM ENUFF OF LORENZO DUO IS ONE would not be able to effect such thoughts.
Nor will the Ideas 4 Barbados team cause dem is not as Brother In Arms Bush Tea would say “touched by the infinite abundance that is GOD”
But de ole man gots to go for now cause there is much to be done for the mid terms heheheheheh
Better reason to stand clear of these Nasty crook lawyers/Ministers in Barbados you need a lawyer before going to a lawyer in Barbados before doing anything, The lawyer then need to be outside of Barbados that does not know the lawyer, The US Embassy nor BAR can be trusted for advice nor past clients recommendations with nothing worth more than 50 cents in value , We never know the lawyers greedy sell out level meter at time, Looking at your death age of 72 and your net-worth more to them being dead, Better to give all Alive with Deed of Gifts and make sure are recorded and do ” DEED Gift Party” for all to see, You can NOT trust any lawyer in Barbados to do intent or job after you are dead, May also have to Do a “Letter of Intent” to go with the Will audio TAPE to get the Spirit of the Intent, At the End of the Day you all are being set up by a Criminal Organised Crime Racketeering Lawyers of Barbados, We need to starve them off the Island and have a BAR set up with no Lawyers on it, The So called Inegity Commette has no less of 4 crooks lawyers that were not vetted or had hearings on to place them there, David Simmons,PAIN, Marshall, Ralph Thorne.4 well know crooks from Violet Beckles time, Appointed by another Massive Land Fraud/PONZI CLICO crook Mia who also has Richard L Cheltenham in the Senate under Protection from US Attorney by sitting in office, They cant live in Office for ever, Hon:Alex-Mitchell:El BFP/CUP
“I hope my new best friend Enuff sees this and leave it alone.”
In all of this there is one thing that none them can see..to their own detriment..
The Electote GIVES and the Electorate TAKES AWAY.
When ya are a FRAUD telling LIES …ya tend to run out of steam…and lies..
When ya are telling the truth…ya tend to be able to carry on forever…the truth has no end.
Piece…am going to do parables for a very long time, this one is too sweet…lol
Whoever has posted these documents, its possible they have breached data protection….shouldnt addresses be blacked out?
“So Ermine Stewart before she even married was a staunch Bee as was her father!!”
That loyal yardfowl thing is what got her in that mess and got the Estate stolen…that is all yardfowls can expect after decades of being mindless yardfowls…them and their families robbed of their Estates by their tiefing masters the ministers/lawyers. ..it is a decades old pattern..
The old yardfowl is lucky the electorate did her favor and rid the island of DLP…or she too would one day be like Ermine… destitute, deceived and left to die in filth. .
Ah hope Enuff got nuff nuff house and land because we done know who will end up with all of it and him and his family will end up with none….I don’t even get any joy out of saying that because many know the destruction and havoc those crimes against vulnerable, blind people wreaks ..it has happened in Barbados for decades.long before those who are vehemently defending those crimes against PAIN’S victims were born.
The blight and plight of the useless yardfowl…lol
Theo
No need to, I can sit back, eat my popcorn and watch you, Abigail, StraightTalk, Piece et al get destroyed by Olivia. FACTS vs conspiracy/egofowlism. To copy from Olivia, any poor 1st year law student would also know the roles of the Executrix and beneficiaries in addressing an estate’s assets bequeathed in common.
If the documents are fake it shouldn’t matter.
Enuff…ya got the wrong idea about who is being destroyed here, but then again, that is the plight of the dumb yardfowl…..ya still fail to understand that the ESTATE is NEITHER PAIN NOR TEETS’…yall are still of the opinion that the tiefing lawyers have some right to this estate.
after they methodically got rid of the Ermine Beneficiary…there is STILL a living Beneficiary to the ESTATE…whom they cannot kill..
I repeat…there is something that they are ALL overlooking…and that thankfully…is what will bring them all down.
They should have done EVERYTHING in their power to keep the ERMINE Beneficiary alive…instead they did EVERYTHING in their power…to hound her to DEATH…
Can’t bring her back now can they…they ain’t got that power.
Yep…one thing staring them all up in their faces that they cannot see…and I am not going to be the one to help them see it…..now if yardfowl ENUFF had even a little bit of smarts…but he don’t. ..lol
And that fraud Olivia who actually ADMITTED that the Will is a forgery…apparently not realizing that it came directly from PAIN’s office…his own paper mill of forgery…..well let’s just say that yall are now so badly haunted by all the evil ya created…that ya actually talking out what PAIN did to the surviving Beneficiaries of the Estate of which there is only now one…
It must be killing them they cannot get to her..
Another thing I find weird about the will and its execution is the funeral expenses item in the invoice.
The executrix was Ermine Atwell.
She was responsible through the estate for the burial of her mother.
The figure given in the invoice is about $1K which is nothing for a funeral even 10 years ago!!
Today the cheapest plot at Coral Ridge I am told is about $4K!!
Glenda Stewart/Harewood claims to have paid $10K.
The executrix should have reimbursed that expense from the estate.
If the Estate’s lawyer paid the bills on credit, that figure should be in the invoice to the estate.
I find that weird.
Everything is weird . The fact that Payne and his co-conspirators would venture behind the back of the other sister named as beneficiary to hid and make plans for the estate is enough reason not to belive any documents presented as “proof” Deceit started the process in motion and any thing presented by Payne and his co-conspirators as evidence should be viewed and seen as suspicious
I have seen forged Wills HAUNTINGS before…it is never pretty and NEVER ends well.
It is not possible to discount the existence of two other wills, those of Ursuline and Ermine.
Whether the will is real or not isn’t the effect the same?
All 3 inherit equally … perhaps except for Ursuline.
The forged Will is definitely filed in the registry….PAIN could NOT change the inheritance schedule.
Because it will now have to be revisited that a forged Will cannot supersede the original Will..that part has to be left for A REAL JUDGE to reverse.
@Olivia
Where is the proceeds of the land; the 2.4 million.
A hearty good morning to all; those with wills, those without wills and those who are unwilling.
Let’ be proactive and try to stomp out this kind of thievery/trickery.
I hope the message that if you have a dime that you should make every effort to ensure that it is passed on to your heirs by having a sound will.
I hope you listened to the message of making copies of your documents and storing the copies (or original in a safe place) before handing anything over to your legal representatives.
Find some way of letting your relatives know what they should receive on your passing. Some of you may be faced with a problem where you cannot trust your heirs or attorney. Remember this “A man can choose his attorney but not his relatives”.. Search for an attorney that you can trust..
I want to add that you should also give a man the respect he has earned. As an attorney, his job, his family or his political office should not provide him with cover to perform wicked deed.
I saw Mr. Holder’s Will which is well written and detailed and no part of it bequeaths anything to Ms. Harewood. In it she is referred to as the daughter of her (HIS) employee.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Was Marie Stewart his employee with whom he also shared a relationship?
They were obviously not married … two different surnames.
Did he describe Ursuline and Ermine differently?
What was the date of the will?
… before or after the redemption of the Cottle Catford mortgage?
Rephrasing the question
Let’s get to the bottom line Where de money at?
@John You are observant. The funeral reimbursement item was an expense for Ursuline’s funeral. According to St. John’s Funeral Home, Glenda Harewood paid for her mother’s funeral in full and yes she should have been reimbursed by the Estate. Ursuline’s funeral was paid in installments. My point is that upon arrival in Barbados on September 6, 2016, these are the issues that should have been addressed, however, instituting a legal action against one’s sister incurs a great deal of rancor. Ermine was urged to reimburse Ms. Harewood and she would have had Ms. Harewood sat down with her. Ms. Harewood and her daughter were on the island from September until February of 2017 and I believe that they could have mended their differences. I was told that at one point Ms. Harewood had resolved to let bygones be bygones, however, her daughter has an agenda that is not necessarily in the best interest of her mother or her siblings. There are many other variables at play here and each and every time Ms. Stewart takes to her videos she makes a case not for her mother but for her adversaries.
According to the bank statements, the approximately 1.5 million dollars is on deposit at a Holetown bank. Fifty percent of said funds are the property of Ms. Harewood. Now if that money has dissapeared or magically diminished, then there IS A BIG PROBLEM.
Which bank?
And the other $1M or $750K?? That’s a small problem?
@ TheOGazerts, The family member to whom the documents were entrusted engaged the services of a New York law firm to peruse and analyze the documents and the accounting forensically. While they have questions regarding standard and customary fees and charges, it is difficult to levy blame since there is no retainer agreement that outlined fees and charges. Again, this situation highlights the need for diligence, vigilance and strict accountability when dealing with Estate matters. Personally speaking, I would have been in Barbados with my lawyer every year to check on the progress and in doing so, we would not be discussing this sad affair today. I am not the family member directed as Ms. Atwell’s post-mortem voice. I am here for damage control since Ms. Stewart does not seem to understand that silence is golden. Retracting misguided comments are difficult when one takes to the airwaves everyday and have yet to deliver one substantial primary document to support her allegations. Her documents pertain to other cases.
When this matter started to pickup steam the blogmaster reached out to Jackie Stewart via Facebook and requested documents to support positions being taken. The objective, to ensure the discussion on social media is informed.
The blogmaster has not taken a position, we have presented information sent to the blog for the BU family to assess the Marie Stewart Estate for themselves. We are still waiting for relevant documents promised by her. It appears the Stewarts are feeding off the fire rage that exist for lawyers. Let there be no doubt the blogmaster is sympathetic to the plight of many Barbadians being held hostage by the legal system. However the approach taken by Jackie Stewart to prosecute the matter needs a rework.
Olivia Wellington
September 8, 2018 9:23 AM
According to the bank statements, the approximately 1.5 million dollars is on deposit at a Holetown bank. Fifty percent of said funds are the property of Ms. Harewood. Now if that money has dissapeared or magically diminished, then there IS A BIG PROBLEM.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
… and there is no executor of the Estate of Marie Stewart to distribute the funds ….. or is there?
The most logical person to fill that post is Glenda Harewood, the deceased daughter and beneficiary!!
Did the $750K disappear before or after the death of Marie Stewart?
@John
What steps should Glenda Harewood take to be appointed?
Thanks.
It appears to me that you are trying to help t but unfortunately, your words fall into a pattern that we have become familiar with
(1) ‘a request to be silent’ and having categorized you as a ‘legal entity (2) lawyers rightly/wrongly supporting each other
It is my hope that you provide sound, helpful and honest advice at all times. If that is the case, then we will eventually see your true colours.
@John. After expenses from the sale and Estate debt-service, all that was realized was $1.5 million. Clearer heads want to know why an Estate account was not created to receive these funds. These are the salient issues at the heart of this matter. Again questions of law and facts not hysterics.
The United Kingdom has a wealth of law firms and I am sure many with who can practice in Barbados. Ms. Harewood can engage a firm on a contingency basis to secure her rights instead of preaching to the choir.
David king Olivia Wellington you are both missing the point the Stewarts dont sound like fools and are not alone all the documents mean nothing that anyones got if they are not Glenda Stewart is the victim here and it is obvious they have been advised not to send documents you are just a blog sight.It is obviious that Olivia Wellington has an agenda and will never out rank the route the Stewarts have taken.Barbados is corrupt that is the issue.
If that was the case then nobody forced her to state that she would have. There is the matter of credibility and integrity. That said, they are free to take whatever decision of their liking.
Then would of sought advise first she has her head screwed on unlike Olivia who has contradicted her self and has no say on this matter that makes her credible
David
September 8, 2018 10:14 AM
@John
What steps should Glenda Harewood take to be appointed?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To me it looks like both sets of beneficiaries in the estate have one thing in common … complete mistrust of the courts and lawyers in Barbados!!
One set is using New York Lawyers, the other is clearly stating their intention never to return to Barbados, raising hell and probably using UK lawyers!!
Anon gave the latin term for the application to replace an executor … there is a process of advertisement in the newspapers and official gazette.
… but, that does not look like it is going to happen from the UK side!!
Mr. Winter, the facts are: In her capacity as Executrix, Ms. Atwell sold a piece of land to satisfy the mounting debt on an estate. Independent counsel outside of Barbados verified that it was in the best interest of the Estate of a whole to stem the bleeding and satisfy the debt to prevent the interest from accumulating. The piece of land at Weston is minor to the other 8 acres that sit waiting tobe dealt with Ninety percent of the estate remains and Ms. Harewood has taken no steps to attend to it. Her daughter has advised her not to do so. Ermine Atwell is dead and resting comfortably while Ms. Harewood and her daughter take to the airwaves with an economy of the truth. Who in their right mind would ignore 8 acres of prime West Coast land for 18 months.
I think there should have been an estate account into which all the proceeds were paid and from which the new executor would settle accounts and beneficiaries interests.
@John. Thank you, our sentiments exactly. I also think Jackie needs to state her objective. What outcome does she and her mother seek?
No i believe the Stewarts have every right to fight from the start is not qualified and I have looked at all the documents posted by the other parties that have had the same injustice the fraud cannot be missed its no ones call but theirs
If Jackie and her mother had lawyers, I am sure that even a second rate lawyer would have advised them to stop speaking on social media and follow the advice of counsel instead of shooting from the hip.
Anon
September 7, 2018 6:00 PM
David, one other thing. When an executor or executrix dies leaving the estate for which he or she is responsible not fully administered an application is made to the Court fo a Grant of Administration cum Testamentary annexo de bonis non.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrator_de_bonis_non_cum_testamento_annexo
Anon just got his/her latin a bit off but who speaks latin these days anyway.
“Administration cum testamento annexo is a Latin term which means with the will annexed. It means an administration granted where the deceased has left a will but has appointed no executor to it or when the executor named is incompetent to act, is deceased, or refuses to act, or from any other legal cause. Here, the court will make the appointment of any person who is usually the residuary legatee, or who is having the largest beneficial interest in the estate. It is also called as administration with the will annexed. ”
https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/administration-cum-testamento-annexo/
Olivia,
That is the bridge that most of us cannot cross. Too much wickedness has been done and people have remained siilent or have been urged to be silent and nothing was done for them.
Who does silence now benefits… Dale, Marshall, BLP and Mia and (Enuff 🙂 )
The court appoints a new executor who has no adverse interest to the estate.
If you have the two sets of beneficiaries with no common ground and are fighting then my guess is the court will probably look to an “independent” third party!!
Such animals don’t exist in Barbados and …. the risk of exposure is high so there might not be too many takers!!.
What I see is two methods in play to combat a common problem, a completely corrupt court and legal system!
“You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth”!!
@John
The cost of professional services just went up.
We never learn not to feed the lawyers.
We curse them but we feed them, go figure
@ John wrote ” complete mistrust of the courts and lawyers in Barbados!! ”
Unfortunately that appears to be true for some Bajans.
The problem is that legal matters in Barbados take such a long time that people believe its the lawyers’ fault.
There was a time in the fifties and sixties when lawyers were highly respected and trusted. That changed from the seventies as lawyers were getting into ” trouble “.
Some of the bad apples are on BU’s ” Lawyers in the news ” potentially spoiling the whole bunch.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.