← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Wayne Cadogan

rhiannaThe question on everybody’s lips as well as mine is what are we celebrating? It appears that we are celebrating fifty years of the Democratic Labour Party -celebrations of exclusion and not fifty years of the country achievements! It would have been nice if the government had outlined a list of accomplishments over the past fifty years. One thing for sure, they helped to destroy our once vibrant garment industry. In the 80’s, they were 79 garment factories and a work force of over 14,000 workers. Instead, all I am hearing is about fetes and more fetes all year leading up to independence. It appears as if it is all feting and in some cases the prices that I am hearing is way above the average person’s pocket.

I really do not intend to participate in anything because to my mind, all the fetes and parties are just a smoke screen to take the masses minds away from the real issues read the current economic situation. Some of the major problems facing the country and affecting the masses are, water woes, garbage collection, poor roads, transportation, educational issues, the lies, broken promises about projects in the pipeline for the past three years etc. What will be their legacy is that we will end up with the IMF at our door step, despite their constant denial that the country is on solid footing.

What Barbados should be celebrating is the success of Rihanna. She is the best thing to happen to Barbados since slice bread. It is very disturbing and mind boggling to understand how our own Rihanna who share the spotlight with President Obama, as the two most famous and recognizable people in the universe -except for Donald Trump’s brief moment of fame and glory after shocking the world by winning the Presidency of the United States of America – yet the government of Barbados cannot see it fit to honour her in a tangible way by putting up a couple of billboards across the island and a life size picture of her on entering the Airport to immigration. Rihanna’s face can be seen all over the world and many countries have up billboards of the super star, except Barbados. Last year, the government saw it fit to put up a number of billboards along the Highway for the Heads of Government Conference, but cannot see it fit for one of their own, who is a world icon. This surely cannot be an over sight after all these years, it is a national disgrace and slap in the face.

For once in my life when I travel and people ask me where I am from and I tell them Barbados, they do not ask me which part of Jamaica is that. Thanks to Rihanna the world knows where is Barbados. Rihanna does more for tourism and marketing of Barbados than the Board of Tourism and its overseas high price marketing agencies. When tourists comes to Barbados, they want to see Rihanna’s house, because of her celebrity status. Rihanna’s home and where she grew up has become a tourist attraction and the government is not capitalizing on it. I would hate to think that the reason for not doing so is because there is nothing for any Minister to attach his or her name to as in the case of the opening of a new building or road. If this is the case, he or she could attach their name to the billboard and have their legacy live on! I am sure that if the former Prime Minister was alive he would have understood what Rihanna’s fame means to Barbados and capitalized on the opportunity to further expose Barbados to get tourists to come to our shores.

It is unfortunate the calibre of some of today’s politicians only get involved in politics to further themselves, families and friends and have very little interest in the economics of the country. Its heart breaking to see that a number of our politicians have no foresight and that some of our best brains are not involved in politics and the planning of our 50th anniversary. No wonder that everyone is asking what are we celebrating? In the many ads I have not seen one single telling the people what the achievements are or even attempting to do so. If this was done, many of the people would not have been so critical in seeing it as just a Democratic Labour Party fanfare. One can see that this is an election gimmick to leading up to the next general elections and not about what the country have achieved over the last 50 years and for a select few to leave their legacy in history for the historians to write about when we are celebrating our 100th anniversary.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 responses to “What a National Disgrace”

  1. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://www.barbadostoday.bb/2016/11/22/risky-road/

    Another disgrace…how stupid can one be to design a roundabout that tilts, one of my daughters did not believe until she visited and decided to drive up to the Warrens area, sensing disaster I quickly went along to make sure she did not end up a statistic at that tilting roundabout…it’s dangerous and not as well lit as it should be…..

    …..another roundabout of death is by the cable ad wireless building in Wildey, diving across 2 or 3 lanes of traffic on 4 wheels to get on to the road to take you back to the pine hill road can only be described as a crime, who dreams up these dangerous daily experiences..anyway steuppss…


  2. AN OVERFLOWING SKIP in the heart of the Dover, Christ Church tourist belt was eventually cleared but not before vendors and visitors expressed disgust about its state.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/90500/skip-issue-dover#sthash.AeYXiywq.dpuf

  3. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    OH shiteee hahahaahahah burrrrrrrrrrrra hahahah what the hell is this that me eyes seeing. Hahaha I can’t stop laugh, hahahahaha. What proper diction; what proper pronunciation, what blasted joker. Hahahahaah. I got to play it again hahahahaahah. I naming this video…” KELLMAN CAN”


  4. Just heard the Minister for MTW stating that he is waiting on a study for Whitehill before he proceeds to cabinet with recommendations.

    I wonder why…

    Whitehill and by Extension The Scotland District has been the most studied section of Bim.

    Whitehills present damage was caused by a leaky water pipe,which was established some years ago.

    The Scotland Districts roads for centuries have been stabilised by some form of the present day interlocking gabions and trees with deep roots.

    Why must we always make a meal out of everything?


  5. It is time that Kellman takes note of the old saying “better to keep your mouth shut and let everyone think that you are stupid than to open it and confirm that you are stupid”.
    I have seen analysis of the water here in Barbados and frankly I have concerns. It is true that our water filters naturally thru the limestone where it collects in the underground caves but it is affected by run off and leachate – he should remember that in the vicinity of Harrison’s Cave no further building is allowed and there is real concern that the runoff from livestock in the area is/has contaminated water in the area.

    Now one can understand why the former PM didnt make Kellman a Minister.


  6. Will this paint last???
    …………………………………………………………….

    Where do you plan to stand?
    Human Chain road markings set
    It will be easy for participants to know where to stand when the One People One Barbados Human Chain is formed come November 28, 2016.
    loopnewsbarbados.com

    http://ow.ly/VOdo306qbvB


  7. Did I hear a discourse yesterday morning , between Mark Williams,and Jeff Broomes on CBC radio, where they both agreed that in 1996 both political parties were in sync over the matter of achieving independence for Barbados. This is far from the truth. The BLP mounted many platforms to enlighten the public of the folly of going independent. I recall one speaker telling the people that independence would have meant , establishing an Army ,an Air Force and a Navy. There were a few activists groups of young men, who also mounted their platforms to enlighten the people of the benefits of gaining independence.
    During the independence debate in parliament,Mr Barrow spoke for 4 hours, and another MCP, (BLP), spoke for 6 hours, just to out do Mr Barrow, and one of his statements, was that the people should lynch these young men who were traveling about Barbados encouraging Barbadians to support Independence.
    Mr Barrow even admonished the Colonial Secretary at the time ,Frederick Lee,during the independence negotiations in London, for accepting a clipping from the Advocate relating to an anti independence feature,handed to him by one of the BLP’s representatives, who was part of the team.


  8. I dare all the blp yahoos that buffooning kellman to try running on a dlp ticket to beat him


  9. Every single issue for you must be distilled through political blood letting with a DLP win, does this make you?


  10. Needs repeating i dare all the blp yardfowls buffooning kellman to run on a blp ticket and beat him

    Not paying u any attention David.


  11. Every constituency/country gets the leadership it deserves.


  12. Why is that a surprise?

    Here is what yardfowls do, they distill all issues through a partisan lens. That applies to both BLP and DLP yardfowls.

    Same type of fowl just a different colour.


  13. Barbados too corrupt and is laughing stock. DPP needed exposed and locking up a long time ago.

    Imagine the two Singh boys from Strathclyde, St Michael got caught red handed some years ago with several hundred pounds of weed imported from Guyana worth over a million $$$

    Their father a well known Journalist Ricky Singh and a Guyanese like DPP Charles Leacock pulled connections.

    The DPP Charles Leacock walked into a Magistrate Court and halted the prelimary criminal proceedings stunning the Prosecutor and all charges were dropped.

    Fingers greased?


  14. Whistleblower
    Correction.The 2 Singh brothers were each fined $150,000.00.Leacock did prosecute the case.There is a story that Bharrat Jagdeo intervened on behalf of the racist Ricky Singh.Ricky Singh is notorious for having never written a word of criticism of the PPP cabal in Guyana.Every week from ’92 to ‘2014 he frothed and puked the coolie doctrine of the PPP.Recall Tom Adams kicked Singh out of Barbados.


  15. @Well well

    I was talking about Canada not Bim. Neville Grant a Baje was a Director there.


  16. I think that the half naked Kelly is kinda sexy, maybe I should go on his Facebook page and tell him so.


  17. However I don’t know why he is implying that Barbados is the only country in the world with clean water. I’ve drunk tap water in maybe two dozen countries, including Barbados with no ill consequences.


  18. @Well Well & Consequences November 21, 2016 at 9:26 AM “Chad has the nerve to berate…Rihanna.”

    Chad has issues with every woman. i do believe that Chad was not born of a woman…born of a she-wolf perhaps.

  19. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…good one Simple.

    Got ya Bajan…thought you meant those useless people at FSC who do not regulate the insurance companies on the island.


  20. Mr. Donald Chapman (Birmingham, Northfield)
    I shall join with the right hon. Member for Taunton (Mr. du Cann) in one or two reservations about the Bill a little later on. Like all hon. Members and particularly like all those who take a close interest in and know the Caribbean, I want first to join in the rejoicings about the Bill and the con- 1662 gratulations that another part of our far-flung Empire is taking on the difficult rôle of independence. For an island of a quarter of a million population, that is no easy rôle, as the right hon. Gentleman said. It is a very small island, and I shall have something to say which leads me to have some reservations on that point in a moment.
    Even if it is small, one can say of Barbados—as has been said of a number of islands, but it applies pre-eminently to Barbados—that this is a little bit of England which somehow floated off and became anchored in the Caribbean. There is nowhere in the world more English than Barbados. It is more English than my own constituency, in the strangest sort of way. It is English with such a tradition that, when toasting the Queen, one is never sure whether Queen Victoria or Queen Elizabeth is being referred to. By that I do not mean to say that they are behind the times, but they are so rooted in the traditions and love of the British way of life that their sense of history shines through at every point.
    It is a moment for congratulation, for offering good wishes and saying how much we hope that it will be a success. I am sure that on pure economic grounds Barbados has as much claim and right to independence on its own feet as any other part of the Caribbean. Although Trinidad has the highest per capita income of 800 or 900 dollars a year, Barbados is not far behind at about 600 dollars, is on about level pegging with Jamaica with that sort of per capita income and well ahead of the Leeward and Windward Islands and, therefore, that much more able to stand on its own feet.
    It has made great strides. It has been independent of help from Britain for some years and has all that claim on independence. It has a development plan which is showing that this small island can make enormous further strides.
    The one big fear which I have is that, with its dependence on sugar, times can be bad, as my right hon. Friend said. A 90 per cent. dependence on sugar is an enormous one, and when one thinks of the erratic nature of the world market in the last few years, one can thank God for the Commonwealth Sugar Agreement but wonder whether even those sorts of 1663 things might one day break down. I am pretty sure that they will not. Both the parties which we have in our House treasure the Commonwealth Sugar Agreement as a means of helping not only Barbados but many other areas. Nevertheless, the doubt and the fear remain.
    Perhaps at this point I might interpose a question and echo what the right hon. Gentleman said. Could my right hon. Friend tell the House how soon something will be said about the outcome of the tripartite survey into the development of the Eastern Caribbean? He knows of my great interest in it and of my continual pressure that Canada and the United States, having been associated in the study, should be associated in the deliberate formal provision of the money to carry out the findings of the survey. Has he yet anything to tell the House about that? If we once knew that at last the two other Governments were coming towards commitment in carrying out the development programme, a lot of us would be much happier in looking to the future of the Caribbean.
    I mention economics. Constitutionally and politically the island is ripe for development, and nothing that I could say would add to what my right hon. Friend and the right hon. Gentleman have said already about the stability and democratic tradition of the island.
    Having said so much about their readiness for independence on economic and political grounds, I come now to my reservation. It is rather different from the hon. Gentleman’s. I was not just sad when the project of the Eastern Caribbean Federation broke down. I was deeply disappointed. Even now, when we are granting independence to Barbados with so much goodwill, I am terribly sad that we are doing it, because it means that we are not really granting what I had hoped would be independence to an Eastern Carribean Federation.
    I do not want to blame anybody. These are not occasions for blame. Everybody was to blame on that one, and Barbados must take its share of the blame. I have a feeling that Barbados was interested in the Federation but then lost interest as the thing went on and as the problem of negotiations with the 1664 Leeward and Windward Islands became more and more difficult and personalities began to cross each other.
    Mr. Barrow, the Prime Minister, must take some blame for not throwing all his weight behind the idea of seeing an Eastern Caribbean Federation through to the end. I hope that even at the point of taking independence Mr. Barrow and the whole of Barbados will take this as a starting point for re-interesting themselves in a future Federation. Wider groupings have to come in the Caribbean, and we all know of the continual pressure and discussion initiated by Dr. Eric Williams, the Prime Minister of Trinidad. I do not know what the precise path to the new pattern of Federation is to be, but unless we all keep talking about it, and unless the newly independent Barbados keeps talking about it, we shall not get it in my lifetime, and that will indeed be a tragedy.
    In that respect I hope that the economic commission which the Ministry of Overseas Development has in Barbados will help, as other things will be helping, to keep alive the spirit of cooperation in one form or another between the islands, rather than floating off into a separate independent existence. As one who took part in getting that Commission there, I regard it as important not only for its job in economics, but for its proper job in keeping the links and fostering the bonds between the islands and various parts of the British Caribbean as we used to know it.
    With that reservation, I welcome the Bill. We have close links with the new Barbados. We have the sugar through the Commonwealth Sugar Agreement. We have a number of Barbadians in this country. The smiling Barbadian faces on the London transport system are one of the best advertisements that Barbados could ever have sent to any country. They are very popular, and we should like them to know in Barbados how welcome they are here.
    We have had, and we shall have, not only those two links. We shall always have cricket, and that is not a bad link, even though we tend to be beaten by the West Indies nowadays. We are glad to be beaten by such fine sportsmen, and to know that there is such a fine link between our two countries.

    “Did I hear a discourse yesterday morning , between Mark Williams,and Jeff Broomes on CBC radio, where they both agreed that in 1996 both political parties were in sync over the matter of achieving independence for Barbados. This is far from the truth”

    No colonel Buggy it is the truth. The acrimony between the DLP and BLP over Independence was about whether elections should be held before independence and there was a group called the “Under Forties” including inter alia Henry Forde , Bernard St John Erskine Sandiford who were agitating for Independence within a Federation.


  21. 3.30 p.m.

    § Sir Frederic Bennett (Torquay) Before commenting on some of the general points that have been made, and some of the things said by the Secretary of State, I want to refer to the last two speeches from hon. Members on the back benches. With all humility I congratulate my right hon. Friend the Member for Taunton (Mr. du Cann) for speaking with such obvious and warm sincerity. I was also particularly impressed by what the hon. Member for Birmingham, Northfield (Mr. Chapman) said about the need not to lose sight of a wider grouping within the Caribbean. I was one of those who mourned very sincerely—as I have no doubt the hon. Member for Northfield did—the passing, before it came to fruition, of the greater West Indian Federation. We all know now—and many of those who live in that area have the same feeling, I suspect—that this was if not a tragedy at least a very regrettable happening.

    1666 We built up our hopes later on the more limited East Caribbean Federation under the leadership of Barbados, but again those hopes were not fulfilled. That is a matter of regret, but whereas the possibility of the West Indian Federation has retreated further into the mist there is a real chance that an Eastern Caribbean Federation may yet come into being, because constitutional developments do not preclude such an event coming about in the future.

    I want to mention the specific question of air fares, because that is something that I have fought for, both with national and independent airlines, for some time. I should be grateful if I.A.T.A. would look at the situation which sometimes arises when a former colonial territory becomes independent. It seems that the air fares are almost automatically jerked up as a result, and this has a harmful effect on those whom we are helping to independence. Countries which are still further away and which are nominally dependent have more advantageous air fares. In the case of Malta it was shown that this situation does not necessarily have to arise and that there are ways round it which I do not want to spell out in detail now.

    My right hon. Friend the Member for Taunton spoke with more than his usual and quite exceptional modesty when he came down from his lofty sphere to speak behind me on the back benches and to pay me the tribute of being able officially to speak for the Opposition much better than he could. I suspect that he had his tongue in his cheek when he said it. I am sure that we were all touched by his speech, because he was speaking from the heart. He knows Barbados very well. I know it reasonably well, and I share the affection expressed in every word that he had to say about the island and its peoples.

    He was right to sound a note of caution on this occasion, in connection with certain aspects of the situation. The Secretary of State has had a rather rough week, and it is not my intention to add to his difficulties this afternoon. I am not laying all the blame on his shoulders—let us distribute it all round—for the fact that the constitutional conference ended up with more outstanding points of difference between the political parties there than he or anyone else would have liked. I am 1667 sure that he did his best to get these difficulties resolved.

    I know that difficulties do arise at these conferences. I have attended a number of them myself, sometimes as an advocate and sometimes in other capacities, but I can remember only one—the Kenya Constitutional Conference—where, in the final outcome, more points of disagreement existed between the two parties than existed on this occasion. But we need not be all that pessimistic because, despite that, the Kenya parties managed to iron out their differences between themselves, although not always by methods of which we would approve, with our traditions.

    One of these differences, which the Secretary of State did not mention—probably by an oversight—concerns single—and double-Member constituencies. This was one of the outstanding differences left over, but, in the last day or two, I learned that a local Order in Council there is to take effect. Although it will take effect only after the next election, nevertheless—whoever wins the election—single-member constituencies, which the Opposition want, will come into being at the beginning of next year. This was a most serious difference and it is worth mentioning.

    The other point which was not mentioned in the Conference report is the argument about whether there should be elections before independence. One should pay tribute here to Mr. Barrow and his colleagues, because we should never have been able to force him to do what he has now agreed to do and take on the risk of fighting the election before independence. I suppose that all parties always express complete confidence in their victory at an election. I do not know whether this would apply to the Liberal Party in this country, but certainly the parties in Barbados seem to have complete confidence about the outcome.

    However, if the Government win, we ought to place on record the fact that the Opposition may later—I hope that they do not—criticise the basis on which independence was granted, because of unresolved points. This will not be the immediate concern of the House and I hope that the Opposition will be able to negotiate agreement on these difficulties, but it is a risk which it would be wrong not to 1668 mention. I think that this is what my hight hon. Friend the Member for Taunton had in mind.

    If the Opposition win, something of a paradox arises, as they will inherit a constitution which, in some respects, they did not want—[An HON. MEMBER: “They will be able to change it.”] Yes, but we hope that they in their turn will change it with a sense of responsibility. I wish that more of the Caribbean islands—I will not be more invidious than that—had as many leaders of moderation and political calibre as has Barbados.

    I have sounded those one or two notes of caution. We have learned that, once the theory of independence has been seized upon by the people as something which they want, any attempt by this House to hold it up does not result in the end for which one hopes, but only creates bitterness in the country concerned. Any attempts, whether in Committee or anywhere else, to make changes in constitutions have ended not only in failure but in spoiling the atmosphere in which the country concerned goes into independence. I hope that nothing which I or any other hon. Member will say will lead to another foray of this sort before the Bill becomes a Statute.


  22. BARBADOS INDEPENDENCE BILL

    HC Deb 28 October 1966 vol 734 cc1651-74 1651
    § Order for Second Reading read.

    § 2.48 p.m.

    § The Secretary of State for the Colonies (Mr. Frederick Lee) I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

    I have it in Command from The Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the Bill, has consented to place Her prerogative and interest, so far as they are affected by the Bill, at the disposal of Parliament for the purposes of the Bill.

    This is the fourth occasion within a period of six months on which I have had the pleasure of introducing a Bill to provide for the advancement to fully responsible status of a dependent territory. Most recently we were concerned with two land-locked African countries, which, in terms of British colonial history, were comparatively young. Now we are to consider the progress to independence of an island on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean whose links with Britain extend unbroken over a period of more than three centuries, and whose Constitution, in which conventions have always played an important part, is one of the oldest in the Commonwealth.

    In an area where small islands face very serious handicaps in the way of size, resources and communications in the struggle to keep apace of progress elsewhere, and even to provide from their own resources for the minimum acceptable standard of public services, Barbados has a very proud record of self-dependence. Without external grant in aid of administration it has built up public services, including a civil service staffed almost wholly by its own local officers, which are the envy of many countries and which can assuredly stand comparison with those of many countries already independent.

    It has also, through sound financial husbandry over many years, been able to raise on its own security sufficient funds to undertake a most impressive programme of capital development to complement the work undertaken with the aid of colonial development and welfare funds. A most successful deep-water harbour, for example, completed in 1961 at a cost of about £6 million, was wholly 1652 financed from loans raised by the Barbados Government on the London market and from other local funds.

    The basis of the island’s economy is its sugar industry. This crop, as many hon. Members know, is intensively cultivated on more than two-thirds of the island’s arable land and employs more than one-third of the working population. With its by-products, sugar represents over 90 per cent. of the island’s domestic exports.

    As a result, Barbados shares with many other developing countries the inherent dangers of a single crop economy. In the discussions with other territories we have all been a little anxious when that consideration is present. But these dangers are being progressively lessened with the rapidly expanding exploitation of those other and more easily available commodities, sun, sea and sand—in other words, by the use of the natural beauty of Barbados and of the very fine weather enjoyed out there. The value of the tourist industry has more than doubled over the past five or six years and there is no reason to expect that momentum of expansion to decline. The development of other local industries is also helping to broaden the base of the economic structure.

    The early years after Englishmen first settled the island in 1627 provide a fascinating story of political intrigue and counter-intrigue, at first between the rival proprietary interests and later also between supporters of the Royalist and Commonwealth factions in England. As early as 1639 the settlers formed a representative legislative assembly and Barbadians have since that time had a large measure of responsibility for their own internal affairs. Universal adult suffrage was introduced in 1951, a Ministerial form of Government in 1954 and in October 1961 Barbados was granted full internal self-government.

    Barbados will be the fourth British dependency in the Caribbean area to become independent. When Jamaica and Trinidad proceeded to separate independence following the dissolution of the West Indies Federation in 1962, Barbados could no doubt also have laid very good claim to follow suit. Instead, greatly to her credit, she preferred to try to form a new federation with the other smaller islands which wanted to make the attempt. I am sure that all 1653 Members of this House will share in the disappointment at the lack of success of that very imaginative venture.

    The Constitutional Conference which I convened in June this year was attended by representatives of all three parties in the Barbados Legislature, who all agreed on the aim of separate independence. There were a number of points where the parties disagreed over particular provisions of the draft Independence Constitution, and these were set out in the Conference Report. The points of principle involved in these differences were not such as in my view compromised the democratic form of the proposed Constitution. I therefore felt bound to take the view that, in general, the Government’s proposals should stand at least until such time as the Opposition parties might be in a position to obtain their amendment by the normal constitutional processes, and to agree that Barbados should become independent on 30th November, 1966.

    All the parties at the Conference were unanimous in wishing Barbados to be accepted as a member of the Commonwealth and in agreeing that the executive authority of Barbados should be vested in Her Majesty and exercisable on her behalf by a Governor-General. I am able now to confirm that Her Majesty has agreed to become Queen of Barbados on 30th November, and at their meeting last month the Commonwealth Prime Ministers agreed that, subject to the completion of the legislative and constitutional processes, Barbados would be welcomed as a member of the Commonwealth.

    The people of Barbados have been given the opportunity to elect a new Legislature before independence. On the advice of the Premier, the old Legislature was dissolved on 10th October some two months before its statutory life of five years expired—and elections are to be held on 3rd November. Whatever the result of those elections, I am sure that the new Government will carry into independence the good wishes of all Members of this House.

    I was one of those in my youthful exuberance who was attracted to the notion put forward by the ‘Under forties ” to pursue Independence within a Federation a notion in which I unrepentantly believe up to this day.

    Independence was not fought for; it was granted on request. Matter of fact ; one of the members of the British Parliament in his contribution to the debate was perceptive to recognize and bemoaned the point that Britain was abandoning the colonies.


  23. Thousands of visitors expected to arrive in Barbados for Independence Celebrations and we can’t even get the fountains at the airport to work all at the same time. 50 Years of Pride and Industry. Does anything work properly around here anymore besides the prime minister?


  24. There was an iconic clip recorded during the Vietnam war, showing a detail of soldiers , who were hesitant in handling the Agent Orange. Up stepped an Officer,whipped out his mug, dipped into the container of Agent Orange and proceeded to gulp it down.
    Brain washing , and misinformation are very powerful tools.


  25. @Hants

    We need the water, the downside is that all the ‘filling’ in the potholes have been washed away. The good news is that minister Michael Lashley promised this evening private contractors will be brought in to assist with the repair to the road system. Apparently a lot of the government equipment is out of order.


  26. Two years after a large chunk of the main road into White Hill, St Andrew collapsed under the weight of waters from heavy rains, residents say it has been anguish, frustration, pain and pure hell since.

    http://www.barbadostoday.bb/2016/11/22/a-mockery/

    Can Barbados afford to preserve villages like White Hill ?


  27. @Hants

    White Hill has morphed to a political transaction.


  28. @ David,

    I believe in preserving villages if they can be made safe and accessible.

    White Hill appears to be a bad location for a village.


  29. Agree with you Hants, it gets to a point where the cost to maintain outweighs good sense.


  30. “Colonel Buggy November 23, 2016 at 2:31 PM #

    There was an iconic clip recorded during the Vietnam war, showing a detail of soldiers , who were hesitant in handling the Agent Orange. Up stepped an Officer,whipped out his mug, dipped into the container of Agent Orange and proceeded to gulp it down.
    Brain washing , and misinformation are very powerful tools.”

    That is why you ought to write fact and not fiction


  31. “Colonel Buggy November 23, 2016 at 2:31 PM #

    There was an iconic clip recorded during the Vietnam war, showing a detail of soldiers , who were hesitant in handling the Agent Orange. Up stepped an Officer,whipped out his mug, dipped into the container of Agent Orange and proceeded to gulp it down.
    Brain washing , and misinformation are very powerful tools.”

    So is Education-That is why you ought to write fact and not fiction.

  32. In and Out AKA waiting Avatar
    In and Out AKA waiting

    The silent majority salute the immigration and customs officers who publicly disassociate themselves from the economic terrorism of the NUPW. The proud sons and daughters who boldly told Macdoweel and Roslyn Smith where to shove their stinking go slow deserve our admiration. The officers made it clear they don’t take kindly to being exploited and placed in a negative spotlight over silliness. They spoke of the the anger directed at them by ordinary people fed up with the strike a day agenda of the worthless NUPW.

    Citizens disgust prevailed in this uncalled for battle. Right thinking people realize their voices make a difference when trade union pettiness disrupts the economy. The madness as Abed called it must be halted in its tracks whenever it starts. Kudos to the dissenters in the ranks of border control.


  33. Whitehill residents most were relocated in the 90s to Farmers,those thatremained did so at their own risk thennew ones moved in.


  34. David November 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM
    A rough head count of the unavailability of Government’s equipment.
    -Persons recently could not have certain procedures done at the QEH due to some equipment not working. Also reported there by recent patients , a shortage of bed sheets and dinner plates
    -Daily we hear complaints from the traveling public that Transport Board buses are far and few between, confirmed by the General Manager yesterday that the Board is “having a few challenges.”
    -We are well aware of the “challenges” with the Sanitation Service Authority’s Fleet.
    -And just recently we have been informed that all of the portable flood lights and Ride -on lawn mowers are out of action.
    -The water pumps at the BWA’s pumping station were “going to ground”, what ever that means.
    -The sewerage pumps on the South coast are clapped out
    – Now we are hearing that most of MTW’s road repair equipment have broken down.
    And I am certain that they are many more. A country which is top heavy with minsters and not a damn thing is working. And these same ministers have to resort to engaging contractors to carrying the work. Some of these contractors ,in the case of MTW, will probably be using equipment which was formerly owned by MTW, purchased at auctions, and quickly put back into operation.
    Why do we not then appoint a Contractor -General and fire some of these useless ministers.


  35. The people are not being led on by the NU PW pr disaster to shut the country down. Govt has stated that with or without the dissenters barbados would celebrate the 50th in grand style. The fact the dispora would brave the long lines at the airport to be part of the celebration goes to the heart of their true patriotism and love for barbados


  36. Your hignorance knows no bounds.

    Are you aware Barbadians who planned to visit at this time would have finalized travel arrangements months ago? Read before go slow or sick out action was contemplated?


  37. “True Patriotism and love for Barbados”
    Fine words which do not transfer into practice for the other 11 months of the year.
    Look around, and tell me that the decay, rot , inefficiencies, neglect and general malaise which now envelops this country is a sign of Patriotism? On ya bike!


  38. @Charles Skeete

    You have published some excerpts from debates in the British House of Commons in an effort to negate the truth of what “Colonel B” wrote. There can be no rewriting of the history of the attempts in some quarters to prevent Barbados from attaining Independence. The “under forties” group played a very prominent role in that campaign preaching to all and sundry about the perils that would befall Barbados if it achieved Independence and it had nothing to do with wanting to ensure that Elections were held prior to Independence.
    Independence was always in the cards after the breakup of the WI Federation and the failure of The “Little Eight”. Britain wanted to rid itself of these Colonial outposts which had gone from a boon to the British economy in supplying much of the raw material used to fuel its economic engine to being a drag on the British Treasury. Britain signaled its intentions as early as 1957 when Kwame Nkrumah(Osagyefo) of Ghana (also known as The Gold Coast) became the first leader of an African country to lead his country to Independence from a Colonial power. That opened the floodgates and many African countries controlled by Whitehall followed suit. In the Caribbean Jamaica was the first to gain Independence followed by Trinidad and then Guyana. Elections in Barbados were constitutionally due in 1966 five years after the Election of 1961 so it is a moot point to claim that these groups were not opposed to Independence but wanted to insure that Elections would be held prior to any granting of Independence when the negotiations with the British Gov’t was being held in the Spring of 1966.

    The year 1957 was pivotal to British intentions, that was the year that The Treaty of Rome was signed leading to the formation of the EEC, although Britain wasn’t an original member its relationship with other European nations were of far greater importance than far flung countries (Canada and Australia/New Zealand excepted) than far flung nations populated with the descendants of Colonial misadventures in various parts of the world.

    One of our great failings in our land is that politicians who were actually in the thick of things never write any bios so Henry Forde and Philip Greaves (last two standing) who were on opposite sides of the debate will probably take their recollections to the grave.


  39. “Why do we not then appoint a Contractor -General ”

    What will be the role of this Contractor-General?


  40. “One of our great failings in our land is that politicians who were actually in the thick of things never write any bios so Henry Forde and Philip Greaves (last two standing) who were on opposite sides of the debate will probably take their recollections to the grave.”

    Very true Sarge, Very true- that is why I can negate what the esteemed Colonel wrote- because the then opposition argued for the holding of elections before Independence and that is a fact. Perhaps it might have been a red herring to stall the process but that is mere speculation.

    Excerpts from the London debates are as follows:

    “One of these differences, which the Secretary of State did not mention—probably by an oversight—concerns single—and double-Member constituencies. This was one of the outstanding differences left over, but, in the last day or two, I learned that a local Order in Council there is to take effect. Although it will take effect only after the next election, nevertheless—whoever wins the election—single-member constituencies, which the Opposition want, will come into being at the beginning of next year. This was a most serious difference and it is worth mentioning.

    The other point which was not mentioned in the Conference report is the argument about whether there should be elections before independence. One should pay tribute here to Mr. Barrow and his colleagues, because we should never have been able to force him to do what he has now agreed to do and take on the risk of fighting the election before independence. I suppose that all parties always express complete confidence in their victory at an election. I do not know whether this would apply to the Liberal Party in this country, but certainly the parties in Barbados seem to have complete confidence about the outcome.

    However, if the Government win, we ought to place on record the fact that the Opposition may later—I hope that they do not—criticise the basis on which independence was granted, because of unresolved points. This will not be the immediate concern of the House and I hope that the Opposition will be able to negotiate agreement on these difficulties, but it is a risk which it would be wrong not to 1668 mention. I think that this is what my hight hon. Friend the Member for Taunton had in mind.

    If the Opposition win, something of a paradox arises, as they will inherit a constitution which, in some respects, they did not want—[An HON. MEMBER: “They will be able to change it.”] Yes, but we hope that they in their turn will change it with a sense of responsibility. I wish that more of the Caribbean islands—I will not be more invidious than that—had as many leaders of moderation and political calibre as has Barbados.”

    I followed the “Under Forties” meetings closely and their views centred on the granting of Independence within a Federation and that is a fact.


  41. “The “under forties” group played a very prominent role in that campaign preaching to all and sundry about the perils that would befall Barbados if it achieved Independence”

    Isn’t that what democracy is all about ?

    If indeed there was the possibility of Barbados having to face certain hurdles on their independence journey; isn’t it the responsibility of responsible persons to address it and educate the public about the possible pitfalls ?
    and having done so should we impute improper motive?

  42. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://ow.ly/GFuE306uvlv

    Alvin…keep ya fingers crossed, if this trend holds up, you just may get ya wish for a newly elected.

  43. Anonymouse - TheGazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – TheGazer

    Hignorance = high ignorance?
    That word is stuck in my mind…

  44. Anonymouse - TheGazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – TheGazer

    To all in the US,,
    Happy Thanksgiving.
    Pray for the country, the president and president elect.

    Even nonbelievers are praying 🙂


  45. This is truly a National Disgrace taking place whilst the uninformed send out platitudes and guzzle themselves silly.
    …………………………………………………

    Native American Girls Describe the REAL History Behind Thanksgiving
    6 Native American girls school us on the REAL history of Thanksgiving. Still haven’t subscribed to Teen Vogue on YouTube? ►► http://bit.ly/tvyoutubesub CONNE…

    Beautiful: Veterans will gather at Standing Rock to help defend protesters from a militarized police force. #NoDAPL #StandingRock
    Click here to support Veterans for Standing Rock #NoDAPL by Wesley Clark
    We are veterans of the United States Armed Forces, including the U.S. Army, United States Marine Corps, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Coast Guard and we are…
    gofundme.com
    https://www.gofundme.com/veterans-for-standing-rock-nodapl


  46. Our journalists and academics can also write biographies and social histories. Why is there not a biography of Rihanna written by a Bajan?

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading