Michael Carrington Expresses Outrage, the CHEEK!


Michael Carrington is challenging the media to reveal the names of politicians who have dealings with criminals. And this challenge is coming from Carrington who wilfully with-held his former client’s property for a number of years.

The Speaker knows the main stream media is spineless and weak when it comes to exposing individuals from certain sections of the Barbadian society. The media, especially the Advocate and CBC, gave him a “free pass” relative to issue between him and former client Griffiths.

Despite having the necessary evidence, the Nation refused to expose Denis Lowe and no media house bothered to investigate the conflict of interest allegations levelled at him and Michael Lashley.

However, if John Browne from Deacons Farm found himself in trouble with the law, the Nation would take delight in dedicating 2 pages to publish, in chronological order, his alleged crimes and events leading to his arrest, as well as interviews conducted with relatives and friends.

Michael Carrington should throw that challenge out to BU.

(posted as a comment to Barbados Underground by Artaxerxes)

There is an interesting story unravelling in Britain where British Member of Parliament (MP) Keith Vaz who holds the influential post of Home Affairs Committee is being pressured by the Opposition political parties, media and members of the citizenry to resign. His ‘crime’: the married father-of-two paid for the men to visit him last month at a flat he owns in London. BU’s read of the situation is that although he committed no crime there is a moral code being applied by members of civil society.

Here is what Vaz’s political leader Prime Minister Theresa May opined on the issue.

Prime Minister Theresa May said on Monday that British Member of Parliament Keith Vaz should make his own decision about his future political career after claims in the Sunday Mirror newspaper about his personal life.

What is important for people is that they feel that they are able to have confidence in their politicians and that’s what we all have a duty to provide for those who elect us,” May said when asked about the report.

What Keith does is for Keith and any decisions he wishes to make are for him but I think that overall what people look for is confidence in their politicians,” she said


The BU household anticipates Vaz will have to resign although to date he has been trying to stave off the public outrage and has referred the matter to his lawyer. Could it be Vaz received legal direction from Freundel Stuart the lawyer to ‘to get a lawyer’?

What is the point of this blog some of you are wondering?

The Speaker of the House Michael Carrington – to use one example – was ordered by the High Court of Barbados Justice Cornelius to pay thousands of dollars to a client he immorally withheld funds for several years. The only reason it was not deem to be criminal is because it was filed as a civil matter.

To add insult to injury many civic minded Barbadians have had to endure hearing Carrington last weekend at his constituency branch meeting express outrage in response to concerns raised by the Reverend Joseph Atherley about the voters list. The cheek!

Unlike our supine and moribund local media rest assured the British equivalent will exact its mandate to ensure the concerns of citizens are highlighted and public officials are held accountable to a code of behaviour deem fit by wider society.

Tags: ,

121 Comments on “Michael Carrington Expresses Outrage, the CHEEK!”

  1. ac September 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM #

    #Dems Now Dems again



  2. Artax September 8, 2016 at 2:37 PM #

    Mr. Blogmaster, I’m sorry, but I must respond to this nonsense.

    The matter between Mottley and her colleagues is BEFORE the COURTS, which means the said matter is being considered by a Judge/Magistrate, to wit SUB JUDICE.

    It would breach standard accepted protocol if Mottley, or any other individual who has a matter before the Court, to use the PUBLIC DOMAIN in an ATTEMPT to DEFEND themselves or REFUTE statements pertaining to the case.

    Discussing the matter in PUBLIC may give rise to prejudice (bias) or prejudice the plaintiff’s or defendant’s chances of victory.

    “On the other hand, I see you have side stepped the bigger” issue by pretending to be ignorant of the similarities/differences between a CIVIL matter and a CRIMINAL matter.

    No amount of political GYMNASTICS, PANDERING or PROPAGANDA you have unsuccessfully tried to introduce to this discussion will NEGATE the FACT (and not propaganda) that Carrington WITH-HELD his client’s funds and was forced by the Court to reimburse him.

    What is important is the public’s perception of Carrington. In the eyes of the public (except political ass lickers like you), he is viewed as a DISHONEST LAWYER who CONVERTED a client’s PROPERTY (without that client’s CONSENT/PERMISSION) for his PERSONAL USE.

    That is a FACT that you or no one can REFUTE.

    Likewise, “I would say a lawyer you are not but a big time political yardfowl with extended wings you are.”


  3. Artax September 8, 2016 at 2:38 PM #

    This is my FINAL response to you on ANY matter raised on BU.

    The following article was taken from the September 29, 2015 edition of the New York Post: (it reminded me of Michael Carrington):

    Lawyer who stole clients’ settlement money gets 4-to-12 years
    By Rebecca Rosenberg

    A greedy personal-injury lawyer who stole nearly $2 million of his clients’ settlements was sentenced Tuesday to 4-to-12 years in prison as his victims tearfully lashed into him for the crimes.

    More than two dozen victims showed up in Manhattan Supreme Court to confront Stephen Krawitz, 63.

    Andrea Clavin, 66, of Levittown, Long Island, wept as she described Krawitz’s theft of her $25,000 car accident settlement.

    “This is a man that has no moral center,” she said. “He’s a narcissistic sociopath and he needs to be in jail and away from society.”

    When she called him repeatedly about her settlement, Krawitz claimed he was in a mental hospital or at his sister’s funeral, she said.

    Sisters Anne-Marie Rough and Suzanne Rough Mora sobbed as they described how Krawitz heartlessly stole $65,000 from their cancer-stricken father Robert, 74, while he was on his deathbed.

    Although Krawitz had already collected the settlement by forging Robert’s signature, he repeatedly sent the ailing man to chase down paperwork he claimed was essential.

    “The most precious thing we had was time and you stole that as well,” said Anne-Marie.

    “The way you lived ostentatiously sickened us. You continued to throw extravagant parties, send your children to exclusive private schools and reside in a $2 million home.”

    Suzanne, who once counted Krawitz as a personal friend, seethed as she described his deceptions. He refused to meet her gaze. “You kept lying knowing he was going to die,” she said. “You stole the money he needed to live, you didn’t care.”

    Krawitz copped to grand larceny and scheme to defraud in July for stealing $1.9 million from 57 of his clients as part of a plea deal.

    He offered a feeble and rambling apology that focused more on his own suffering than that of his victims.

    “Good people sometimes do bad things, “ he said, prompting sarcastic laughter from the gallery. “I’m here today to admit my wrongdoing.”

    Krawitz then chronicled the impact of his crime on his own life as he sprinkled in quotes from the Talmud and Proverbs. His wife left him, his daughter refuses to talk to him, he lost his house and at one point was suicidal, he whined.

    Justice Melissa Jackson then sentenced Krawitz to the promised term.

    “The tragedy in this case is that many of Stephen Krawitz’s personal injury clients were unnecessarily forced to suffer further as a result of their own attorney stealing from them,” said District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in a statement.


  4. ac September 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM #

    Correct .The matter is before the court. However before the issue was brought to the court for resolution. She knew of all the allegations and accusations level against her but remained silent


  5. ac September 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM #

    In as much as would would like for Mia to distance her self from the issue .The issue itself is relevant to what you and other blp operatives including David has accused govt lack of being transparent in your knee jerk reaction to stem the flow of the muddy waters which will eventually drown Mia
    It is unbelievable and unacceptable that any one can asked for the confidence of self by the nation when their character reflects symbols of irresponsibility indifference which is a directive and a guide to leadership


  6. pieceuhderockyeahright September 8, 2016 at 3:22 PM #

    @ the Honourable Blogmaster.

    Sometimes your advice regarding the AC is spot one AND we posters are well advised to read her dribble and carry on smartly.

    But there are other times when…there is a method to the collective madness that serves to “fan the fires” that will consume the Democratic Labour Party.

    There is a thing that you more than anyone else here will note.

    There is no article of any uplifting nature, no technological initiative, no theosophical discourse, no social issue, no medical topic that AC and her legion cohorts CAN OR WILL discuss.

    This will confirm two things

    A) For those topics of depth, WHEN THEY ARE INITIATED, the grouping of AC, Pigrim, Kelman, Stinkliar and the other fellow that has a modicum of sense and rues the day he joined their pack, they cease and desist, AND THE TOPIC(s) flourish

    That suggests that the BU site has accomplished its objective as a blog i.e. to attract the chatterati and the quasi intelligentsia to discuss matters and hopefully create the locus that you desire for our nation going forward – the Virtual Workspace for Vibrant Participatory Democracy

    B) The are afraid of BU and have to come here, WHETHER THEY WANT TO OR NOT, for even though they say that the site is nonsense when they are in the House o Assembly, they come here daily and read or send their proxy to comment.

    We are at the cusp of the General Elections and thousands of readers come here and cut and paste the articles of interest as you know.

    For the “undecideds” this blog is the barometer that they use to read and review and come to the decisions that will impact on that General Election.

    They watch and see that the die hards here speak and predict truths and this is what AC fears.

    That is why they have upped their game and sent more intellectual persons to war here on BU, but those people are busy people UNLIKE THE DOUFUS AC.

    Now here is the clincher.

    They cannot disengage from BU BECAUSE OF YOUR IMPACT and they understand the CURRENCY AND THRUST THAT BU HAS.

    It is understandable that you tire of the idiot, you have been doing this for years but I would like you to look at this in the context of “short term” impact which is the conversion of the readership to conta DLP voters instead of medium to long term objectives.

    What is going to happen is that readers will realise that AC is an idiot but, and this is the critical takeaway, they will say “wait but she is the DLP’s mouthpiece!!!” and that will confirm within their minds the need to get rid of her party.

    Why do you think that henderson Bovell was silenced here???

    You think that Mia Mottley is an idiot?? He was starting to dilute the currency of the BLP and she could not afford that!!

    And just in case you think that we shall have to contend with AC going forward in the medium/long term.

    When they are beaten resoundingly, she and her colleagues are going to be sooooo shamed that de ole man absolutely guarantees you that she will never come back to BU.

    Let that dynamic “fester” it is the catalyst for the perfect storm, constantly to be fanned, and inflamed, until the conflagration “novas” and the idiots go quietly into the vacuum that is space.


  7. pieceuhderockyeahright September 8, 2016 at 3:39 PM #

    One other thing.

    As a pretend strategist and “fomentor of evil machinations” as per ***, you need to understand the strategy that AC is being directed to employ.

    A) Get you vex and mek you dun de blog in a fit of anger

    B) Get certain Bloggers vex or banned by you the Honourable Blogmaster

    C) Get the site banned for some offending treasonous and seditious comment, DAT BE DE VERLA DEPEIZA SPECIAL

    D) Tek out the serious as ass bloggers/posters by causing them to focus on side issues

    E) Commandeer the conversation with a focus on specific persons who are campaigning against the DLP.

    David Come Sing a Song, Mia Mottley anyone who is in the limelight and actively pursuing office.

    Artaxerxes (with the Archive Keys dat de man wud not share wid de ole man), Due Diligence Bush Tea, You, De Word, wunna heavy rollers dat when wunna does talk people does listen, Donna, Peter Thompson, the Sage Annunaki)

    Dem doan concern bout Dr Georgie Porgie UNLESS HE START DECRYING THE WAY THEM EF UP DE POLYCLINICS and other things medical.

    And no de ole man ent in dat list causing I is a neanderthal and a Stoopid Cartoon Boy and a Piece uh Madman dat shell shock heheheheheh.

    You have the statistics Mr King.

    Of the 1 million blog items here AC post 500K she self.

    500K balls uh Jobby to whichin dat is for de toilet.

    As the General Elections get closer it is going to heat up alot more.

    All uh dem walking trough de cuntstituencies already BUT all de walking dat dem doing when de Election Results return, dem gine RUN FUH DE EFFING HILLS.



  8. Exclaimer September 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM #

    The second half of this programme is inspirational.



  9. ac September 8, 2016 at 4:58 PM #


    Brilliant analysis and assessment of before! after and inbetween


  10. ac September 8, 2016 at 5:04 PM #

    But let me tell you this all that you have said have been said before all your antics and political posters have bee doe before , so dont get the cocky belief that you are a first,, maybe among many who have tried and failed to convince the electorate
    However what is on my mind is the blatant hypocrisy of those who have been spinning the wheel of transparency except when the wheel stops and their number is called
    Now it is Mia’s turn to be transparent a line is drawn in the sand


  11. Well Well & Consequences September 8, 2016 at 5:13 PM #

    Art…Krawitz the tief needs to do everyone a favor and kill his damn self and so should the tief…Michael Carrington.


  12. Tell me Why September 8, 2016 at 8:24 PM #

    Why do you all respond to AC’s diatribe. She or he (IT) is just a distraction from the issues that are affecting Barbadians and when we respond to her excretion, we simply miss the bus. Forget AC and focus on how bloggers can make Barbados better without being personal.


  13. BaJan boy September 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM #

    @Artax you are absolutely correct and the fact that he didn’t have the money to repay means that he converted it to his own use and purpose. That is and ingredient in Fraud. The only thing that saved his theifing ass is that the only really wanted his money and didn’t care the means he got it,hence he didn’t go the police and a criminal case was not filed under the larceny act by the attorney. Thanks to their savior the now multi million millionaire he could easily pull his pockets and pay the quarter million as he makes millions monthly. No wonder he builds everything without permission with no regard for town planning. Sure bajans can’t cannot wait to get rid of these bandits..


  14. Watchman September 9, 2016 at 6:55 AM #

    Any person living in or out of Barbados, who write these ACs comments to defend the DLP, are really sick minded and evil to the core, Walter PPK Blackman its not too late, save yourself from the curse of being a yard-fowl of the DLP


  15. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 8:19 AM #

    The party is over for government ministers, family, friends and yardfowls

    HINT, HINT!!!!!!

    Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 8:07 AM #

    Were bajans even aware that they were allowed free healthcare when visiting the UK, I know the government ministers, friends and family were well aware though, did they bother to tell the population. ..or was it a big state secret told only to a few….well the party yall had is over.

    So much for Sealy and his idiocy, this is one of the fall outs from Brexit, another message is being sent to the Barbados government ministers….if only their heads were not so hard in thinking they special.


  16. Enuff September 9, 2016 at 8:59 AM #


    “We are looking at the option of cement and the durability of cement roads. The project will take place on three roads, two in St Michael and one in St Lucy. The contract has already been awarded. While Arawak has been good to us, we will go with whoever has the cheapest prices,” he said.

    Contract awarded based on what price, Arawak or Rock Hard (the whoever referred to above)? Tings dat mek yuh laff if not yuh would cry.


  17. ac September 9, 2016 at 9:01 AM #

    Watchman what i wrote is the truth .Your problem being there is no defense you can bring to support the allegations against your leader allegations of vote tampering and embezzlement as told by one of her members.Yet you got nerve to call me sick. You are the sick moron check self first yard bird.


  18. David September 9, 2016 at 9:07 AM #


    The response is so simplistic.



  19. Bush Tea September 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM #

    @ Enuff
    This man Lashley is so obviously a low-life underworld pawn that it is bordering on funny…
    There are already many ‘prototype’ concrete roads in Barbados that CLEARLY show the benefits and durability of concrete – quite apart from the fact that LOCAL MATERIALS are much more used in this approach.
    We persisted with asphalt because back then, COW/Rayside were able to ‘fix’ poor-ass roads every 5 years….. at ridiculous costs…just in time for elections…

    Hard Rock IMPORTS cement (at great FOREX costs) that is available from ARAWAK using local inputs….
    No one doubts that Lashley will see a different approach that gels with Maloney’s…


  20. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 9:15 AM #

    ACs…why dont yall publish the proof of Mia’s corruption….or shut up….where is the proof.

    You know would love to see the proof to make her miserable all day.


  21. ac September 9, 2016 at 9:24 AM #

    All allegations is on court record .


  22. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 9:27 AM #

    So…ACs…post it… and why is Fruendel not taking the information to DPP Leacock for criminal investigation and lock up, as he is advising everyone else…..why is he protecting Mia while you on here mouthing off.


  23. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 9:35 AM #




  24. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 11:06 AM #

    Catch 22×2 = Catch 44.


  25. Artax September 9, 2016 at 12:47 PM #

    This DLP administration made a decision to sell the BNTCL as far back as 2013. During the recent August 13, 2016 Budget presentation, Sinckler mentioned: “Likewise Sir, we had expected that the sale of the Barbados National Terminal Company Limited (BNTCL) would have been completed before the close of the financial year to assist in offsetting some of these unexpected expenditures but that was not to happen as negotiations with the preferred bidder are still ongoing as we speak.”

    Taking the above comments into consideration, we can reasonably assume the BNOC is a “done deal,” to which members of the Barbados Cabinet have agreed.

    However, I recall that, on the evening of Saturday January 5, 2013, while addressing those in attendance at the launch of the DLP’s St. Joseph’s constituency office for candidate Dennis Holder, DR. DAVID ESTWICK made following comments relative to Owen Arthur’s suggestion that government should privatize the BNTCL:

    “I QUESTION then the LOGIC of attempting to SELL the BNOC and the BNTCL. The reason why I’m going to CONTINUE to HAMMER this is because every single country in the world, maintains what yuh call their national strategic reserves of oil…… gasoline….. diesel….. etc. It is… it is OWNED by the country to PROTECT energy security for all of us. And any… and any PRIME MINISTER that is PREPARED to GIVE AWAY and SELL OFF a COMPANY that MAINTAINS the NATIONAL OIL RESERVES of BARBADOS has to be HALF A MADMAN.”


  26. Artax September 9, 2016 at 12:48 PM #

    Estwick also made the point that should the BNTCL be privatized, the prices of petroleum products would increase as a result.

    “You understand….. and what is even more ridiculous about the discussion is this……… right now….. the BNTC imports diesel, kerosene…… we sell any oil that we produce locally….. we send that oil to Petrotrin in Trinidad, and it comes back….. the BNTCL gets a rate of return on investment of 1%……. and that 1%, is so as to keep prices down. You tell me any business man in Barbados that is going to take over the BNTCL and get 1% rate of return on his investment. You tell me…. show me any of them…….. right. And what it means is that from the time those companies are put in private sector people hands, that they will be looking for highest returns for their shareholders, and you can rest assured that what would end up happening, is (1) DIESEL prices gine STRAIGHT UP in the AIR, as well as GASOLINE prices, as well as KEROSENE, etc. And it bothers me that an individual, who is supposed to be an economist, does not seem to understand how inflationary that would be in a small economy that imports majority of its inflation via oil and other products.”

    We all know Estwick is a member of this DLP administration’s Cabinet and would have participated in the decision to sell BNTCL.

    Rather “huff and puff” like the “big bad wolf” and bark like a “pit bull” as he usually does when dealing with “parochial” issues, perhaps Estwick should EXPLAIN to his CONSTITUENTS and BARBADIANS the REASONS why he is now SUPPORTING the sale of BNTCL.

    Estwick should be dismissed by the electorate as just another boisterous, loud mouth, weak and spineless politician, who is afraid to represent the people who elected him.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Artax September 9, 2016 at 1:18 PM #

    @ WW&C

    Forget the stupid yard-fowls, they are attempting to cast aspirations on the character of Mottley in the ABSENCE of the Court deciding, based on the evidence presented, if the allegations leveled against her are true. Even town character “Ninja Man” knows this a weak attempt at political posturing.

    On the other hand, the FACTS are, based on the court’s decision in the case of John Griffiths vs. Michael Carrington, Justice Jacqueline Cornelius ORDERED Carrington (defendant) to surrender nearly a quarter-million dollars to John Griffiths (plaintiff), funds RECEIVED and WITHHELD over two years ago from the sale of a property as well as various bank deposits and that he render an account of all sums belonging to the particular estate within 28 days. He was also ordered to “pay interest at the rate of per annum” from May 13 until the entire sum is paid, and legal costs of over $7 700 incurred by the plaintiff.

    As you know, WW&C, the mare fact Justice Cornelius RULED in FAVOUR of the plaintiff, she had to be satisfied the evidence presented was enough to hold the defendant LIABLE for RECEIVING and UNLAWFULLY WITH-HOLDING the funds without the plaintiff’s consent. Hence, the reason why the defendant had to repay the entire sum, inclusive of interest, as well as the plaintiff’s legal costs.

    Therefore, “it is unbelievable and (highly) unacceptable that anyone can ask for the confidence of (Michael Carrington) by the nation when (his) character reflects symbols of irresponsibility, indifference and DISHONESTY, which are NOT a directive and a guide to leadership, (especially for an individual who is an ELECTED member of parliament and OCCUPIES the POSITION as Speaker of the House of Assembly).”


  28. Watchman September 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM #


    you are really sick, when you can’t identify what is truth , but very soon, you will be treated one way or the other


  29. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 2:25 PM #

    Art….what I said more than likely went way over the heads of ALL the ACs….but the politicians who are lawyers understood quite well.

    Politicians from both parties have for decades either sued each other, the newspapers or others with glee and maliciousness for libel because they spoke the truth about the politicians’ corrupt behaviors and they used the archaic libel laws which both governments refuse to remove from the statute books, because those antiquated laws protects them in their corruption and crimes against the people. …while making them additional money.

    The yardfowls have no shame in allowing themselves to be used as the ACs are currently being used to paint Mia as corrupt. ..when both sides of DBLP divide have found themselves stuck in the same quagmire and can only make accusations of corruption against each other…..but though true, both political parties are unable to take it to the next level to end or reduce the corruption, like other countries…

    …….though the ACs are accusing Mia, Fruendel cannot lock up Mia or take that active case to the DPP to press charges…..it is left to see if Mia will also continue the trend of giving this government a pass after she sees what is left if the people’s treasury.

    They will both…DBLP…have to continue on that path of destruction until they implode. They have bith spent decades weaving a very tangled web.

    The wheelchair bound client of Michael Carrington, should have filed criminal charges and Carrington would not now be so uppity, arrogant and cocky.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Bush Tea September 9, 2016 at 4:13 PM #

    @ Artax
    Rather “huff and puff” like the “big bad wolf” and bark like a “pit bull” as he usually does when dealing with “parochial” issues, perhaps Estwick should EXPLAIN to his CONSTITUENTS and BARBADIANS the REASONS why he is now SUPPORTING the sale of BNTCL.
    Yuh hear the man is a shiite-hound!!!
    All bark and no damn bite….

    he just happens to have a good “imitation pit bull” bark….


  31. Georgie Porgie September 9, 2016 at 4:15 PM #

    bush tea
    not only is he a shit hound HE IS A SARDINE TOT RETRIEVER LIKE MY BUDY MR PD


  32. David September 9, 2016 at 4:27 PM #


    You see these last comments of yours? This is how you add enormous value to the blog.


  33. Bush Tea September 9, 2016 at 4:34 PM #

    Not Bushie and your PD war bozie…

    But Estwick is a PERSONAL piss-off….
    Bushie actually thought that the man had balls….
    ..The lotta BIG talk…
    ..de RED shirt after Thompson’s death..
    ..The ‘alternative’ economic plans..
    ..The lotta big talk about Sugar reform; Wave energy; water solutions….

    ….and all like now poor people in St Andrew can’t get water for a whole damn YEAR….
    …He taking us back to the 1940s with his shiite ‘stand-pipes….

    …and his sorry ass still smelling ’bout behind Froon and Stinkliar like a pot starver…

    Sardine tot retriever shiite….
    Man …he is one breed below that GP…..


  34. Well Well & Consequences September 9, 2016 at 8:16 PM #

    Wait..the ACs never came back, I 6yhought they were going to post evidence of Mia’s corruption on BUZ and take the evidence to DPP Leacock, so he can arrest Mia…and I am here waiting and waiting.


  35. Bush Tea September 9, 2016 at 9:33 PM #

    @ Enuff
    Aljazeera is doing a documentary called ‘Stealing Paradise’ about government scams in the Maldives with hotel enterprises, to steal 1.5 BILLION dollars from the treasury.

    Seems that they had a good auditor general too…


  36. Well Well & Consequences September 10, 2016 at 6:09 AM #

    Easiest way for government ministers to steal money from the treasury…contracts for this, contracts for that. …all awarded to the same thieves….decade after decade.

    If ya really want to steal huge amounts from the treasury…collude with the same thieves to build hotels and use the old tourism excuse to involve taxpayer’s money, even if tourism is npt bringing in enough foreign exchange to cut diwn the deficit or run the economy efficiently, or pay the country’s debts….but it’s a cakewalk, blink and ya will miss the next sleazy plays.


  37. Well Well & Consequences September 10, 2016 at 6:31 AM #


    Is Estwick getting senile, isn’t he the minister responsible for setting bad policies, that is resulting in lack of water. ..that makes him the one to blame.

    The ministers want to collect salaries but no blame.


  38. Gabriel September 10, 2016 at 7:01 AM #

    I remember this fellow Estwick on CBCTV at a meeting in the Ivy in 99 screaming in the microphone to the crowd “We want power,gih we power”.Now he has it he misuses and abuses it.He is an example of the bottom feeders who rose to the top because of EWB and some of his misguided policy decisions.Barbados must recognize its not a communist country.Estwick like all his fellow DLP ministers should be sensible to recognise and comprehend the old saying….the apple don’t fall far from the tree….he’s nothing but a lowlife scumbag gunslinger whose license to own and carry a firearm should have been taken away since that incident in Parliament.In the bad old colonial days his ass would be up before the magistrates before he could blink.


  39. Gabriel September 10, 2016 at 7:03 AM #



  40. millertheannunaki September 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM #

    @ ac September 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM #
    “Sir again you spew half truths an innuendos to validate your argument of dishonesty against Carrington .However i will keep reminding you that the court ruling says different and until such time you can produce documentation supporting your argument of theft attributed to Carringtons conduct i would continue to present my argument on the court’s ruling
    On the issue of Mia’s conduct although their was not a legal decision made the evidence presented has not been refuted publicly by Mia which means that inconclusive of any other evidence presented by her to refute .. her silence gives consent to beliving the evidence giving by witness is true”

    Ac and co, you see why we are not too perturb in putting you in the same category as Naked Departure (ND). Not even a pinch of snuff or a smidgen of dirty dust can get between you and Sherri V. The only difference is that Sherri V is much better looking than you even with your false weave on.

    We shall never forget how you treated Ms Lisa Marshal here on this blog; a woman just like you like to claim to be. But here is the rub of blatant hypocrisy and hog-pen of dishonesty in which you like dip and wallow your character of deceit.

    After waging a sustained campaign of character assassination and verbal abuse (long enough to make War & Peace look like a comic strip) against MAM and other women like Ms June Fowler of the CLICO debacle fame who dare to put their heads above political parapet to expose the dirty dealings of the current goons in control of the DLP, how could you now in all honesty make on another blog the following claim to support women?

    From ac September 10, 2016 at 9:44 AM
    “For too long women did not have a voice on matters of concern to their personnel well being. Women were supposed to keep silent in a male dominated enviroment of rules and standards defined by men.Now that the plaster is removed from those sores that were allowed to fester what has been revealed are deep cuts of pain and heart break reminders of a yesterday when women were told yes you can get the job”but first”
    Now that woman has band together for a cause of enlightment through legislation there are still some who have a commonality with a persistence embolden with pretense misrepresentation that woman should be faulted and all gains that women have acquired should be abandon..”


  41. Well Well & Consequences September 10, 2016 at 1:06 PM #

    “Ac and co, you see why we are not too perturb in putting you in the same category as Naked Departure (ND). Not even a pinch of snuff or a smidgen of dirty dust can get between you and Sherri V. The only difference is that Sherri V is much better looking than you even with your false weave on.”



  42. ac September 10, 2016 at 2:35 PM #

    Miller what kind of criminal are you to down play the signifince of woman’s right and attached them to your political asgenda of a tale of sordid allegations pointed in the direction of the blp leader by one of her members
    You need to hang your head in shame


  43. Violet C Beckles September 11, 2016 at 6:04 AM #

    The wheelchair bound client of Michael Carrington, should have filed criminal charges and Carrington would not now be so uppity, arrogant and cocky@@@@

    Well Well , the fraud squad nor the DPP will not charge/file any kind .never fraud/ criminal charges of any Minister in Barbados, If that was the case we all need not be so deep in crime, The lack of going after lawyers and Ministers for crimes reach us to where we are now,when the government is removed these post must be cleaned out, Then all things must be looked at again,


  44. Exclaimer September 11, 2016 at 4:26 PM #

    Five days ago, I posted an explosive Aljazeera documentary called “Stealing Paradise”. It documented in detail the relative ease required in transforming an idyllic tropical paradise (The Maldives) into a mafia state.

    The story of The Maldives mirrors closely that of Barbados.

    The above documentary exposed to the world media the scale of corruption within The Maldives. One year ago, Brother Bush Tea stated that Aljazeera were present in Barbados. I have heard nothing since. One wonders if they were on the verge of creating a similar documentary that would have exposed the endemic levels of corruption on our beloved island. Perhaps the authorities got wind and chased them off the island. Who knows?

    Barbados remains the poster child of the eastern Caribbean. It is an image that it has guarded obsessively since her independence. I have watched the above documentary several times over and believe firmly that someone in the international media will eventually expose the real Barbados – very soon.

    This may be our only hope for salvation.



  45. Gabriel September 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM #

    This man the DPP keep cropping up all the time.The man is a Guyanese and is known to throw his weight around because he boasts of a direct line to the GG the person credited with grooming him and treating him like a favourite child.There is more in the mortar than the pestle in changing that retirement date that was taken to the House for amendment.Froon got embarrassed by the folly of big ups.As usual he did not do his homework.Leacock is mr arrogant himself.He has screwed up once more.He will pay for what he did to young Nicholls.


Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: