← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Heather Cole

The dictionary defines a squatter as an unlawful occupant of land or a building. Just this week in the Press there was a video of Mark Maloney refuting a suggestion that was made by Trevor Prescod that the persons who are squatting on Crown lands at the Belle should be allowed to occupy houses at the Villages of Coverley that are unoccupied. He made it clear that no squatter will be allowed at the Villages of Coverley. One can only assume that Mr. Prescod meant that since the houses are completed and listed as rent to own, that the government should purchase the houses for the people from the Belle.

One will recall that the DLP Government entered into a leasing agreement with Housing Concepts SRL – also owned and/or managed by the said Mark Maloney and Bjorn Bjerkham to build houses for Barbadians at the Coverley Development site. The terms of the lease agreement is $100.00 for 99 years. It was so low that it was labelled as pepper corn by another contributor to the Barbados Underground. In Thursday’s edition of Barbados Today, Mr. Maloney stated that prices of these houses range from $280,000.00 to $340,000.00.

Everyone is aware that it is unlawful to occupy land in the Belle since it is has implications for contaminating the water supply. Any agreement undertaken between the Government of Barbados and any entity is a legally binding document and therefore lawful. The agreement between the National Housing Corporation and Housing Concepts SRL was specifically for residential housing development. The Town and Country Planning department did not give permission for the construction of a gas station or the obstruction of the road reserve.

We are all aware of the fact that on two occasions Mr. Maloney has broken the agreement while occupying the land at the Villages of Coverley. In the first instance, it was the building of the Rubis gas station and the second was the obstruction of road reserve which resulted in the death of a young Barbadian student. The two infractions of the agreement are still in effect as government has been negligent in enforcing their removal. Since Mr. Maloney has broken the leasing agreement and to date no Auditor General’s Report has contained information about funds from Coverley, one cannot ensure that Mr. Maloney is making the payments per the lease agreement, we can all but wonder if he is lawfully occupying the 41 hectares of land while making super profits.

The property at Coverley does not belong to Mr. Maloney. It belongs to the Government and people of Barbados. No action has been taken against Mr. Maloney for building the Rubis gas station on public property. Cannot the same reasoning be applied that low income persons can occupy the houses which are on public property without action been taken against them? Can the people from the Belle occupy the houses and if the police are called to eject them, would a Minister call and prevent that action?

How wrong could Mr. Prescod have been to ask that the unoccupied houses be turned over to the squatters in the Belle? How right could Mr. Maloney have been to state that no squatters would be allowed at the Villages of Coverley? It make one wonder if there are inferior citizens in Barbados and that they can be prohibited from living in certain areas. Mr. Maloney seems to have forgotten that he signed a legally binding contract that allows government to purchase any houses that he is unable to sell. It makes one wonder why he even bothered to sign the contract when he had no intention of keeping it since he already broke it twice.

The bottom line is that Government must not enter into these adulterated sweetheart deals that are driven by corruption. It must also ensure that Barbadians are not disadvantaged and that they have access to housing in all developments. That is, that all developments must have a percentage of their housing stock set aside for low income earners even if at a price differential which is subsidized by government. We must discard the term low income housing as it perpetrates the stigma of classism and elitism in society. Mr. Maloney’s statements about not allowing persons from Belle to be relocated to the Villages of Coverley perpetrates the argument for two Barbados’ even though the people are brainwashed at election time into thinking that there is only one.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

354 responses to “Who Maloney Think He Is?”


  1. @flyonthewall

    You are correct about one thing, by the number of referrals this submission is merrily bouncing around social media. Tell us something, the thesis of her submission, does it merit sharing a view?


  2. Yes any one can see that Heather is being used as a bastion of political yardfowl opportunism riding on the backside of a politically damaged oppostion a party which is seeking to recover lost ground as well as their souls


  3. @flyonthewall

    Further, the beauty of social media is that you or anyone can post an ‘op-ed’?


  4. No govt owes squatters an individual right to free land and housing derived off the backs of taxpayers.Yes indeed it is a moral responsibility handed to both govt and civil society to preserve as humanely possible that which is necessary by way of good and responsible governance a sembelance of dignity for the people.
    However it does not negate flooish offerings dictated by irresponsible acts of kindness and deeds
    Yes govt must make sure any acts of kindness and good deeds are balanced and not catalyst by which all and sundry belive that an individual acts of negilence should be a staple for good reward

  5. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    AC…as I said, throw piss on ya’ll when you come pimping for votes. The government has a mandate to prevent social problems, squatting is a social problem.

    The government has a mandate to protect the water source of the country..read water table…..the Belle, where the squatters reside is a water table and source of water for the island.

    It is not rocket science and I hope none of the idiots in parliament allow you, a bigger idiot, to make decisions for the island other than what you spout on BU.


  6. @ NUTRON BOMB

    I think that there is a good chance that the BWA is not being paid for water at Coverley but please bring us some evidence.


  7. Coverley’s website hints there is water storage.

    http://villagesatcoverley.net/frequently-asked-questions


  8. @ David

    This does not support NUTRON BOMB’s claim. I hate the Maloney/DLP business as much as anybody but we have to be fair.


  9. “Yes any one can see that Heather is being used as a bastion of political yard fowl opportunism riding on the backside of a politically damaged opposition a party which is seeking to recover lost ground as well as their souls.”

    Hmmmmmmm ………………… Your above comments are quite interesting.

    I hope you have formed a similar opinion about yourself and the DLP’s pseudonym “Douglas.” Ironically, the ACs, on a DAILY BASIS, engages in actions similar to what they are accusing Heather of and can identify with the above comments.

    Additionally, if the recent OPINION POLL is taken into CONSIDERATION we can amend those comments as follows:

    “Yes, anyone can see that (AC and Douglas) are being USED as bastions of POLITICAL YARD FOWL OPPORTUNISM riding on the backside of a POLITICALLY DAMAGED (DLP), a party which is seeking to RECOVER LOST GROUND as well as their souls.”


  10. Let those of us with the capacity to focus on the big issue recall how the Westminster system is suppose to work. MPs are suppose to serve the interest of those who elected them. However all agree the system in its pure design was hijacked a long time ago. This us the reality we have to confront.

  11. Montezuma's Revenge Avatar
    Montezuma’s Revenge

    @ Old Baje
    The monthly bwa bills to housing concepts for water to coverley villages is reversed monthly. why is it so hard for someone to ask john mawanza whether bwa credits housing concepts/maloney for water delivered and properly billed??

  12. Montezuma's Revenge Avatar
    Montezuma’s Revenge

    the DLP have sanctioned that maloney should not pay for water at coverley, so they does get FREE water every blasted month.


  13. Barbados needs more “low income housing” for squatters and others. Deacons road and Farm road are good examples.

    6 shop assistants living together could not make payments on a $340,000 mortgage.

    The NHC is supposed to build housing for low income people including squatters.

    Barbados is one mistake away from an outbreak of ecoli.


  14. Brass Tacks Sunday focused on Grenville Philips’ political party. Unfortunately, he did not receive much sympathy from Hartley Henry, who was of the opinion that an indidual cannot wake up one morning and say to himself: “I am fed up with the current system, so I will form a political party.

    Henry also suggested that Philips did not identify a constituency with which he is intimately associated or seek to represent, and if he did, what are his plans for that constituency. Those are three facts that must be taken into consideration.

  15. Montezuma's Revenge Avatar
    Montezuma’s Revenge

    well well well, now if you on knew well what was coming from from the well in belle, you would know we are doomed drinking the water from the well of hell. things might be dread but we are still consuming lead.


  16. The progressive socio-economic development policy prescription inherent in Prescod’s suggestion seems too complex for many here to grasp. The man, being political or not, is simply promoting the idea of mixed/balanced communities on what is essentially government land. This argument about the persons being squatters is a folly!!
    The issue is access to affordable land, and if government can’t make its own land available for housing at an affordable price to persons who lack the financial resources, then shame on government. Especially when it has been made available to the likes of Maloney to make massive profit and flout town planning regulations.
    Don’t squatters work? Can’t they afford to pay rent? Coverley is like a ghost town and it appears that Maloney is planning to build expensive houses on the remaining land. Why not build some apt blocks for squatters and others in that “demographic” to use Maloney’s word? Or the squatters are not good enough for Coverley? Maloney clearly seems to think so!
    Prescod’s comment, as David alluded to earlier, also brings back into sharp focus the absurdity of the Coverley development: small lots, small low density houses where only a garage is available for extension and a overly favourable 99yr lease agreement; yet the houses are exorbitantly priced notwithstanding the fact that Maloney’s own company supplied the slabs for the building process. Now the man is likely to make even more money off the government with the planned “upscale” units for the next phase at Coverley.
    The government has NO vision, no strategy and no idea of what it is doing or to do. What has become of the Dems’ mantra “more than an economy but a society”?


  17. @Enuf wrote

    The government has NO vision, no strategy and no idea of what it is doing or to do. What has become of the Dems’ mantra “more than an economy but a society”?

    U mussee joking? Dem know how to ENHANCE Dem Net Wuth!


  18. Who has travelled to Mexico for example. It is not uncommon to spot slums/squatters and expensive housing coexisting. The bottomline is that government is responsible for the social wellbeing of the country. If there is philanthropy to support all the better. It is unacceptable to have hundreds of government units shut out to the public if there is a high demand.


  19. Well said David. It just happens to be squatters Prescod mentioned, but applies to all those persons who are unable to get piece ah de rock. The $5 per sq foot land Kellman touts on CLICO plantation lands in parishes without water and proper bus services?


  20. I am still waiting on a posting from theflyonthewall that completely demolishes Heather’s contribution. It seems as if she has given the fly a next opportunity to point out her errors and so I will be eagerly following his (non-)contribution.


  21. @ Montezuma’s Revenge

    Thanks for the info on Coverley. I hope that someone in the sleeping press corps will pursue this.


  22. Well then if TP idea of benelovency resonates among the Shepplie of the barnyard fowls. Then those in disagreement would gladly handover that high wire act of benelovecy to next blp administration when and if it happens..cause it will not happen under responsible governance

  23. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    The houses at coverley contrary to what Maloney thinks, are crap, years ago I took some photos, when one of my dsughters in a moment of madness while on vacation, took a trip home and saw photos online re these houses, after viewing them, I took a trip just to take photos and prove to here, they were indeed crap, as I suspected. The photos posted online and the reality when touring the houses, dont mesh.

    .Those houses are quite suitable for low income startup homes, but nothing else. After finance checks and being qualified through 2 banks for mortgage, the cost of the houses are no longer 300k plus, but 600-700k for a small oven in coverley. Bjerkham, Bizzy, Maloney and the politicians who enable them are crooks.

  24. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    *one of my daughters.


  25. If one does some elementary mathematics, it seems as if robber baron fortunes are being made on that island.


  26. @TheGazer

    Have you ever visited Coverley?

    The offer to those who like it is about a village with lifestyle and support services. It is not just about the structure.

  27. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Gazer…exactly, fortunes of small time, small island robber barons being made on the backs of the people, aided by the politicians….I have no clue who the lands at coverley belong to….Violet Beckles lays claim, but I bet if one does a very thorough land search, one would find that it does not belong to government, bizzy, Bjerkham or Maloney, yet they leased it out to Bjerkham for 99 years, longer than either of them can live, their greed will outlive them.


  28. Did the Great Dipper not promised once, to open the doors of Illaro Court and allow Bajans to march through it and mash it up? I wonder if he would have given the squatters in the Belle and elsewhere, a similar mandate over the Coverley Concentration Camp, except to occupy it, rather than mash it up.

  29. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar

    I am not at all defending Mr Maloney, but when he said “no squatters at Coverley”, is this not exactly what he meant? No rational property owner encourages squatters. I did not imagine him to be saying that the houses at Coverley are not available for purchase by “former” squatters who would have forgone their accumulating rights of adverse possession in the Belle et aliunde.


  30. We should try not to stray from the central point of the submission. It is hard for some of us who are stuck to positions with the strength of concrete.


  31. @Jeff

    Is this what Heather is saying?

  32. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar

    I am not clear, David. What exactly did he say? The second statement would be regrettably discriminatory and probably illegal!


  33. David @ 5.09pm

    Preconco?????????


  34. On second thoughts, squatters need not occupy the Coverley Developement
    The taxpayers of Barbados have more that enough sidelined buildings lying idle.
    The (not very) old National Insurance Building
    The Louis Lynch Secondary School
    The old General Hospital
    The old Barbados Water Authority HQ
    The old Society Primary school
    The old Chalky Mount School
    The old St Bernards School
    Umpteen buildings around the garrison
    Culloden Farm, official home of the first Prime Minister.
    Redundant factories in the Industrial Estates
    The Public Library
    Old US Naval Base
    Glendairy Prisons
    Queens Park House.
    Old government building in Oistin .
    BWA’s abandoned building at Exchange, St Michael/St Thomas
    Old St Bartolemews school.
    New unoccupied apartment blocks at the Grotto.
    Umpteen little houses in Church Village , St P.
    The old St Joseph Post Office
    And the list goes on

    http://i.imgur.com/5bKVNPP.jpg?1


  35. @ Jeff it is discrimination plain and simple against a segment of the Barbadian population.


  36. Mark Maloney had the gall when he was constructing Coverley, to block off two access points around Coverley, leading to a ready mix cement plant , owned by Barbadian, Mr Legall, who had to obtain the services of a tractor to push away the obstacles placed in public and cart roads ,by Maloney , who apparently took it upon himself to act as the Chief Town Planner.
    And if that was not bad enough for Mr Legall, a van owned by another cement plant ,located in the St James area, was seen in the area, shortly before Mr Legall’s $1 Million electronic cement batcher went up in smoke.
    Who are really calling the shots in Barbados? Certainly not those who are jumping up shouting about 50 years of independence.


  37. Colonel Buggy, the Grotto units more expensive than Coverley and the contractor done got paid from one of the loan guarantee facilities at the Central Bank. I don’t know how anyone can read about Grotto, Coverley etc and not feel ill.#Kellmanisaclown


  38. @enuff

    Didn’t Kellman defend by saying the HCF was set up to fund low cost housing and this is what the Grotto was built to do.


  39. The BLP brigade you ought to be honest in their assessment of what came out of TP mouth where the truthfulness lies in his mitigated gall of asking the govt to buy houses at a high market value for the squatters Everything in the right context fits perfectly like a glove


  40. David
    You have just evaginated Minister Kellman!
    If that is the case, how then could he have said that the apartments must be “commercialised”? They can’t be market and low income at the same time.
    I also take you back to my comment about the government being responsible for “procuring” planning permission for Cahill. Look at the gas station in Coverley and the building of the access point on the highway reserve then read para 18 & 19 of the town planning act.


  41. @ ac isn’t your goverment stockpiling houses to give away at election time? Is it legal to give away houses only at that time? The onesbto get them may not be in dire need as the squatters.

  42. Montezuma's Revenge Avatar
    Montezuma’s Revenge

    The houses at Coverley, Valerie and Grotta got all of stealin in them.


  43. @Enuff

    Are you saying Kellman is a vaginanus derivative of ‘evaginated’?


  44. @ the Flyonthewall, I am embarrassed at the fact that you continue to discredit me.

  45. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ ac February 28, 2016 at 6:14 PM
    “Everything in the right context fits perfectly like a glove.”

    So when are you going to see the Grotto High Rise condominiums occupied with some SUV’s parked in the specially designed underground car park?

    Since this ‘classy’ housing solution is rather close to Bridgetown and the socially upscale schools selling those Canary Wharf penthouses should be easy-peasy for their builder Maloney. The only think missing would be the river. But why not use your imagination and think subterranean where streams of water abound that should be of interest to the BWA.


  46. Heather February 28, 2016 at 5:39 PM #
    @ Jeff it is discrimination plain and simple against a segment of the Barbadian population.

    Let’s solve it easy so, ask those via whatever fair means that bought at Coverley if they want neighbours who are “squatters” or who come from areas where violence and criminality is very high. We will then discover who is DISCRIMINATING!


  47. @ Enuff, I totally agree with you 1:47 pm post. Well said!


  48. @Gazer
    Do me a favour and go piss up a rope. You are nothing more than a cheap back-up singer in the Heather Cole band. The way people operate on this site, the two of you might well be one and the same. Heather Cole is here to stir shit on behalf of the BLP, but the bias towards that party runs strong here so no one is going to call her on it. Prescod makes a statement designed to create mischief and to embarrass the Government, and within days she picks up the tune and plays it on BU. Many here simply can’t or won’t connect the dots.


  49. @ ac February 28, 2016 at 9:06 AM #

    “Only in barbados would some unnerving fool agree that the ” peoples property” which should be safeguarded by the govt should be giving away willy nilly to the hands of free loaders. In any other country squatters would have been uprooted and deemed illegally occupying property without having permission or right therof”……………..
    ……………………………………………………

    Wait ac……………..are you by the slip of the tongue now confirming what we all suspected that you morons we have for a government have actually paid Maloney for the mini expensive houses at Coverley?

    The truth has a strange way in being manifested!

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading