Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Pachamama
Current BLP Leader Mia Mottley (l) Former BLP Leader Owen Arthur
Current BLP Leader Mia Mottley (l) Former BLP Leader Owen Arthur

As a recidivist coup plotter within a political culture where displacing the leaderships within his party and the other partner in a hideous duopoly dance, Owen Seymour Arthur (OSA), may not be operating contrary to law but certainly his actions border on the immoral. An immorality that is widespread and infects the entire polity. In the nation newspaper of Monday, January 06, OSA is quoted with a determination that the policies of his political leader were a mere โ€˜gimmickโ€™. Mia Amor Mottley (MAM), as leader of the opposition BLP, had earlier suggested some sort of eminent persons group should be set up to help government, at least, better understand their current problems. Indeed, she indicated that the recommendations of this group, as proposed, should guide national policy as her party, the BLP, would have been represented. She suggested OSA and some former agriculture minister of little merit. OSA was not to be beguiled but this Trojan horse.

Certainly it was beyond our comprehension that after the scandalous removal of MAM, just before the last elections, that this same project could have had a place in Barbadian politics, let alone at its centre. We considered then that OSA was now perceived as having treated at least one woman badly and that the current objective reality would have precluded this scenario a second time around. Not so! So much so we were forced to contact a noted Caribbean political scientist to aid our understanding of this behavior at the centre of national politics. This renewed, open and vicious attack on MAM must be best located within the mind of the man who is known to have promised his erstwhile and closest advisers that he will never leave MAM in the leadership of the BLP. Most importantly, it seems informed by a deep sense of hatred (loathing) that could have been generated from the interference of Mia into the domestic affairs of Owen.

At that time Mia had suggested that men were to be able to take horns, regardless from whence they came. These actions seemed to hurt Owen in his most sensitive region. Now, he speaks like a man who wants to work out a deeply personal matter within the politics of a party, a country, at the most inappropriate time. This level of unbridled viciousness is not well known in Barbadian politics, within parties and outside of an election period. Let alone aimed at a party leader.

Our sources have reliably informed us that the Nation Newspaper, acting to save face for Mia, called Owen to inquire whether his public statement might have been wrongly calibrated. His apparent response was that he was correctly quoted. This represents the immorality of a newspaper that will only let us read what a significant political figure in Barbados has to say when once that person insist that he meant what he said. An immorality well established by its leading founder/member.

Owen deepens his loathing for Mia by privately dressing up his determination in issues of class. He being the โ€˜poorโ€™ boy and she with the money and social class pedigree. It is from that resource base that certain expenditure were to be made to support a number of DLP candidates in the last election. For Owen, this was one of the reasons for the lost the last elections. Others may include the lethargy and general unhelpfulness of Mia and the Mottley crew during those elections.

The immorality in Barbadian politics is generalized to the wider culture. So whether we are talking about the relationship amongst men or those between women they represent powerful factors that are hardly measured in the polls by Wickham and others. But the culture of immorality extends to the economic sphere as well. In both cases these relationships are to be hidden from the general populace. Even when we suspect that certain central tendencies exist they are never represented in and of themselves. So the infliction of emotional pain on Owen by Mia, several years ago, may serve to avoid the best critical responses from the BLP; handed a life line to Sinckler on the very day he was scheduled to appear before the press in circumstances of a national economic meltdown; undermined Mia and depressurized Stuart as captain of a boat either leaking or adrift in a turbulent ocean. Until Owen could complete this fourth coup he seems well prepared to have the Sinckler/Stuart duo in charge of Barbados. For Owen it is to be anybody else but Mia. And as such, any attempt by her to run the government of Barbados from the opposition benches must of necessity be seen as a failure.

But Stuart has his problems too. Like Mia, he has a team of people who are essentially Thompsonโ€™s people. Our sources tell us that there is a certain level of anxiety within the cabinet of the DLP. Indeed Stuart is not in a position to, for example, fire Sinckler even as a way of alleviating current pressures or buying time. He is not known to, himself, have any deep technical understanding about economics and therefore is at a certain disadvantage given the history of power in Barbados. Not that this makes him dissimilar to Sinckler.

Arthurโ€™s attempt to justify his characterization along bureaucratic lines makes this public denunciation of Mia no less visceral. It is however consistent with the most notable public behaviors of Arthur.ย  We speak about the crying in Parliament for porridge; the coup against a DLP of Sandiford; some aspects of his reign as prime minister; the instigation of the coup against Mascol as leader of the DLP; the removal of Mia the first time, and now this missive.

What we have here is a country unable to respond to a deep and growing crisis and the emergence of a level of inbreeding that makes national problem solving impossible. When political parties have lost their abilities to manage themselves. When the culture of the coup becomes the only accepted mechanism to overthrow an establishment or to make political change. When all these political and personal shenanigans take place, largely, outside of the publicโ€™s eye. When issues of the heart continue to nibble away at the very fabric of the society as problematized by personal relationships that are yet to be generally acceptable to most Bajans, at least as measured by their public utterances.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

142 responses to “Barbados – King Arthur’s Fourth Coup-d’état and Widespread ‘Immorality’ take Centre Stage within a Deep Political-Economic Crisis.”


  1. THIS POST IS AS ASININE AS THEY COME.
    WUNNA COULD REALLY FIND SOMETHING TO DO WITH WUNNA TIME DO !

    POST DISMISSED !!!


  2. ,“….and some former agriculture minister of little merit.”

    A Career of Service: Erskine Griffith, GCM

    Erskine Griffith, GCM, has done what very few persons in Barbados have been able to do โ€“ he has transitioned from a career Civil Servant to a Minister of Government. After a distinguished career as a Public Officer Mr. Griffith became Barbadosโ€™ Ambassador to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in Geneva. In 2003, he was appointed to the Senate by the then Barbados Labour Party (BLP) administration and held the post of Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Barbados Cabinet.

    During his tenure in the Civil Service he held two of the most important and prestigious positions, those of Director of Finance and Economic Affairs and Head of the Civil Service. He also held a number of other posts at Ministries and Departments including the Customs Department, the Audit Office, the Treasury Department, the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs. His most distinguished service was in the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, where he spent the better part of his civil service career โ€“ more than twenty-seven years. During that time in the Ministry he provided guidance and leadership, and was responsible for modernizing fiscal management systems. His skills were much in demand, especially during the economically difficult 1990s. He also held such positions as Budget Analyst, Senior Budget Analyst, Chief Budget Analyst, Senior Assistant Secretary (later re-designated Senior Administrative Officer) and Permanent Secretary, Finance. In addition, Senator Griffith sat on a number of Boards including the Port Authority; Barbados Agricultural Credit Trust; Barbados Agricultural Management Company; Land Reclaimers; National Insurance and the Barbados National Bank. He was also a Member of the Student Revolving Loan Fund Management Committee. Mr. Griffith represented Barbados regionally and internationally as part of government delegations to such institutions as the Inter-American Development Bank, the Caribbean Development Bank, CARICOM, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and various Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) meetings. His career as a Civil Servant ended on September 9, 2000, after more than forty-one years of service.

    Mr. Griffith holds a B.A. in History and Economics and a Diploma in Public Administration from the University of the West Indies, as well as a Master of Science Degree in Financial Studies from the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

    I guess we can decide whether he is of little, a lot or no merit.


  3. Just Asking,
    This DLP operative is catching at straws. OSA was only saying that it makes no sense to meet or plan or give this inept government any advice, they would not take it. MAM wants to practice a different kind of politics but she must realise by now that you cannot work with or trust the Dems even if she is friends with them.

    Much ado about nothing, focus on the state that the nitwits have this country in!


  4. Outstanding analysis hats off to you Pach its a shocker BU let you post the piece. Its beyond puzzling what Arthur is repeatedly doing to Mia she does not warrant it no matter her politics or lifestyle. When oh when is Arthur going to finally retire and ride off into the sunset.

    Mia don’t cry for Arthur you must respond to him . Hit him with everything you’ve got. Throw the kitchen sink if you must. Its patently obvious he will not exit the stage until he destroys you. You have to purge him now so the party can heal by 2018. You have no choice if you don’t retaliate strongly voters will condemn you as weak unfit for national leadership.


  5. Just Asking your asinine comments above are a reflection of the life sore that exists in the bosom of the BLP.

    Until MAM repent for her unbridled coordination of the tapping of OSA phone while he was PM…..she and the BLP will rot on the opposition benches.

    The PEGASUS hotel tape is still running !

    The DEMs will take the tough decisions that must taken to restructure the Barbados economy…..is indeed a pity that the handful of BLP despots on this BU site never encouraged OSA and MAM to the same while they were in office.

    GREENLAND remains a prime example.

  6. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    I think the post is a good one yet I consider that Owen Arthur was the most brilliant, focused and hard working holder of the office of PM in this country. Of course many will say those statements are absolute contradictions, given the thrust of the Pachamama post. However, I think that there were two Arthurs. The Arthur who steered the ship of state brilliantly in his first two terms of office and the Arthur from the end of his third term, who, like Barrow before him, made many mistakes as he progressively lost the mental energy that characterized his first two terms as PM. The apparent OSA “vendetta” against Mia Mottley has been plausibly explained to me for the first time in this Pachamama article and, if Pachamama is correct, I can now understand why OSA might have reacted in the way he has to MAM because of a deep personal hurt that will not go away.

    That “gimmick” statement by OSA, however, was a poisoned spear that has damaged the credibility of the BLP opposition as a viable alternative Government to take over from the abysmally poor Stuart led Government even though perhaps not absolutely as it would still be the best choice of the two in such an eventuality. I thought at first that the gimmick statement might have been a misquote but if Pachamama’s assertion is true that the Nation gave OSA a chance to retract it and he didn’t, it suggests that the wounds cannot be healed.

    As I said on another thread we are in ducks gut. Realistically the DLP has proven that it definitely can’t properly lead this country with Stuart at the Hellum and several non-performers in the Cabinet. The BLP has a track record of economic and societal management but is transparently split unless some creative patching can be quickly done. The other Political parties have no track record or credibility. Perhaps now is the time for the Coconut Mahogany Group to do what is necessary to endear itself to the electorate.

  7. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Enuff;

    I agree with your response to the phrase in the article “,โ€œโ€ฆ.and some former agriculture minister of little merit.โ€”.

    Mr. Griffith was an exceedingly competent Financial Professional with high level experience in managing the Barbados Economy from the Ministry of Finance for several years through different BLP-DLP governments. If there is someone who can guide the economy properly now it is Mr. Griffith. He is a lot more than “some former agriculture minister of little merit”. That phrase was uncalled for in an otherwise good article.


  8. OSA conveyed that the unions and the Government are playing games and he called it a gimmick because they know the die is cast and they are just going through motions.
    I guarantee that the Coconut Ma-hog-Any Party,the CMP ,will lose their deposits both now and in any future attempt at the polls under the present system.


  9. @ Pachamama

    Very enlightening. I am only sorry that Just Asking, Prodigal Son and their family of party faithful/loyal were not the author or the brains behind the research and submission. Nonetheless it carries greater weight by you doing it.

    Credit is due to Erskine Griffith former Senator and I acknowledge and give him due honour.

    It is all well and good to dissect Chris Sinckler’s comments and compare to the PM’s. However, when it comes to the Hon. Mia and the Hon. Owen whom we love dearly it becomes a problem.

    A word to the wise is enough.

    The Hon. Owen S. Arthur remains silent on a particular issue with the Leader of the Opposition.

    Evil flourishes when the righteous remains silent.

    By this we know that Owen is considered righteous when responding to Mia.

    However, except we all repent we shall likewise perish as Sodom and Gomorrah.

    The BLP supporters can support Mia and say what Owen meant – Owen said what he meant and reiterated, confirmed, repeated for clarity what he said and meant … and .. he is quite capable of speaking for himself.


  10. The truth hurts the BLP yardfowls like Prodigal, Gabriel, Enuff and Just Yardfowl asking, especially coming from the mouth of a former BLP Prime Minister.


  11. Arthur called Mottley’s proposal A GIMMICK -It is laughable that while all the other BLP spin doctors are here trying to do some damage control, when Arthur was given the chance to retract or sugar coat the statement , he did not- he simply said that he was quoted accurately.
    Arthur made the statement and is not backing away from it but some pathetic partisans here on BU are trying to tell Arthur what he meant to say.
    Wake up and realize that Owen Arthur has NO CONFIDENCE in Mia Mottley. He has seen her up close and knows the worst thing Barbados could do is to give that wiretapping, self absorbed megalomaniac Mottley ultimate political power.
    Owen knows that she does not have a clue what to do but is huffing, puffing and bluffing.


  12. Let us agree that Arthur’s gimmick comment is unfortunate what now?


  13. WUNNA WANT TO MAKE A CASE AGAINST MIA AND USING WHAT OWEN SAID OR DID NOT SAY

    YOU ALL ARE SO PATHETIC WITH YOU SORRY EXCUSE FOR A GOVERNMENT AND A PRIME MINISTER THAT DOES NOT INSPIRE CONFIDENCE .. THE WORST PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER OF FINANCE EVER AND A STINKING BANKRUPT OF IDEAS PARTY CALLED THE DLP WHO EVERY TIME THEY FORM THE GOVERNMENT PUSHES BARBADOS IN A DEEP DARK HOLE.
    WHEN THE BLP FORMS THE GOVERNMENT EVERYTHING IS LESS DIFFICULT , BAJANS GET COMPLACENT AND GIVE THE DLP A CHANCE AND THEY MESS UP BI G TIME


  14. I THINK BETTER OF YOU DAVID …IT IS AS IF YOU STOP AT THE GIMMICK CAPTION AND IGNORE THE BODY OF THE ARTICLE.
    I DONT BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE THAT SIMPLE MINDED BUT ANYTHING GOES NOWADAYS


  15. @Just Asking

    Stupid is stupid and it was an unfortunate selection of a word by Arthur which fuels the speculation by many that he is not comfortable with MAM’s leadership. Refer to UWI press conference. It is similar to te spectre of the Eager 11 which hangs over the DLP. We are in a right mess aren’t we?

  16. Truly amazing !!! Avatar
    Truly amazing !!!

    @ David .
    Is it known that the DLP apologist TENNYSON JOSEPH who writes a weekly column in the Nation is a St Lucian politician who contested a seat in the last election and was among those who lost following the electorate’s reaction to the corruption among his party ? Why does he not keep out of Barbados’ politics and go and try to do something useful for his country ? Maybe he is hoping that the Barbados Government would put him out of the country so he could return to St Lucia as a martyr like another Cave Hill lecturer who later became Prime Minister in St Vincent … Joseph should be mindful of the old saying “charity begins at home” and go back where he belongs ; his country St Lucia needs him .


  17. Just Asking…..you are a GIMMICK !

    BUT :
    The divide between OSA and MAM is no GIMMICK !

    The divide between Edmund Hinkson and George Payne is no GIMMICK !

    Bajans are SMARTER than that….the BLP is too divisive and destructive for Barbados today….the DEMs have to take the tough decisions to restructure the economy .

    And that we will do.


  18. same crap different pile.come on really?look
    In 2009[6] and 2010, members of the upscale real estate industry in Barbados propose the creation of artificial islands to be placed off the west coast. According to Paul Altman of Altman Realty the envisioned plan, would consist of two islands, one measuring 250 acres (1.0 km2) in size, and would house new tourism based developments and upscale boutique shops; while the second island would be 50 acres (200,000 m2) in size, and would serve as an open national park. Both proposed islands would be a short distance from the Deep Water Harbour in Bridgetown.[7][8]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Barbados
    now is time.!!!!!!!!!!


  19. I still cannot understand what the DLP apologists are gloating about. Neither Mr Arthur or Ms Mottley are in a position under our system of governance to do anything to save this country from the disastrous situation into which we have been placed by this do-not-know-what-to-do administration; they should be concerned about the criticism by staunch supporter Mr Reudon Eversley of the poor performance of the leadership and management of the country.


  20. “What we have here is a country unable to respond to a deep and growing crisis and the emergence of a level of inbreeding that makes national problem solving impossible. When political parties have lost their abilities to manage themselves. When the culture of the coup becomes the only accepted mechanism to overthrow an establishment or to make political change. When all these political and personal shenanigans take place, largely, outside of the publicโ€™s eye. When issues of the heart continue to nibble away at the very fabric of the society as problematized by personal relationships that are yet to be generally acceptable to most Bajans, at least as measured by their public utterances”
    Your analysis cannot be faulted Pacha except for your uninformed critique of a highly competent and extremely professional former public servant. Who knows Pacha- as I tried seemingly unsuccessfully to point out to Are-you-There in another post; perhaps this infighting in the political parties might be a form of self-destruction which might inadvertently usher in a new system of governance without having to resort to cracking heads or shooting people.


  21. David

    Pacha’s article, as always, is deeply reflective. But since all the nuances of what Owen Arthur actually said in the Nation comment are unclear (because disputed here), are you able to provide a link to it?


  22. @Truly Amazing

    Is Barbados a democracy or not.

  23. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Contrary to the nonsense you wrote in this article let me just point out to you that the then Agriculture minister in the form of Erskine Griffith was credited by all a sundry at that ministry, exception being a former disgruntled DPS as being the best minister of agriculture they ever to ever grace that office.

  24. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    that should read
    …..best minister of agriculture to ever grace that office…


  25. @Truly Amazing
    Your St.Lucian comment is rooted in ignorance, bigotry and down right short- sightedness. Your little compositional eloquence – reminds me of Descates perennial – dictum: Cogito – Ergo – Sum- I think therefore I am. Perhaps your have forgotten or you must have forgotten that we now living in the NEW- GLOBAL – AGE? Where the world is supposed to progressively trandsform itself into this NEW- GLOBAL – VILLAGE eliminating the concepts of country and nationality.


  26. Truly Amazing, the free flow of population eliminates the need for borders and countries right?


  27. A gimmick!

    • A gimmick!Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur. (FP)

    BY RICKY JORDAN | MON, JANUARY 06, 2014 – 12:11 AM

    <

    p>Calling it a โ€œgimmickโ€, former Prime Minister Owen Arthur believes the notion of forming an eminent persons group to try to avert Barbadosโ€™ economic woes at this stage would be impractical since the Government had already made up its mind.

    <

    p>Stating he had heard about this proposal recently, he said the eminent persons group โ€œwould have its reputation savagely savagedโ€ because there was nothing it could do in just over a week, since Government would start laying off public workers by January 15.

    <

    p>โ€œWhat can you do? The group would have to commission studies, it would have to see all of the information that the Government has access to, the Government itself or somebody with authority would have to commission it, and would have to be prepared to take the report and act upon it. To do all that in a week is not even heroic; itโ€™s an absurdity,โ€ he told the DAILY NATION in an interview yesterday.

    <

    p>Arthur said he had already made his position clear on the idea, which had been proposed by his colleague, Opposition Leader Mia Mottley, last month.

    <

    p>Please read the full story in todayโ€™s DAILY NATION, or in the eNATION edition.


  28. @Pachamama
    You are in the know : former agriculture minister without merit…. level of inbreeding …
    But creatively omitted the lady from the East , without merit but a mountain of family ties and a pension for uncle


  29. Let us be honest, the only measurement we should use to determine the success of a minister of agriculture is: have we been able to reduce our food bill over the years?


  30. David, my grammar is very bad, but I do know that you should never use a Semi – Colon in from of a Verb.


  31. @ Truly Amazing
    The last time I check the Deputy Speaker of our Parliament and holder of the safest seat in Barbadian politics was also a St.Lucian whose father was heavily involved in St.Lucian political affairs.

    @Bajanfuhlife
    If this issue is hurting me, the state of the Barbados economy resulting from the inept management of the DLP must be killing you. Bye!


  32. We may have made an imprecise measurement of the former agriculture minister. However, we are not generally guided that an ‘exemplary’ career in the civil service is a necessary precondition for helping a country that is experiencing a crisis unlike none in its history. Our judgment tends to lean towards a new kind of thinking. For us this type of individual will be minded to restore pass ‘glory’ while less than capable of perceiving the future accurately. This is an underlying national problem.

    We are never too interested in all the honors but if Erskine Griffith was such an excellent civil servant, why do we have more problems now than when he joined that service. How come we still can’t feed ourselves. This inability is the main reason we are in trouble. We gave OSA a pass but our best judgment would not permit us to assess him as having the skills necessary to effect our dire situation either. Some may persuasively argue that Arthur had more to do with these problems that either Stuart or Sinckler. We have, as a country, a limited pool of human resources.

    No amount of BLP or DLP leanings will help us to properly understand our problems far less find solutions. If we are to overcome this deepening national crisis Bajans are going to have to do some virtually impossible things. These may include the jettisoning of party loyalty, as a first step.

  33. Truly amazing !!! Avatar
    Truly amazing !!!

    @ David
    Of course the line should read “BLP APOLOGIST TENNYSON JOSEPH”…..


  34. This is the time more than ever before for the broad masses and middle classes of this Barbados to secure the absolute permanent removal of the DLP and BLP from the parliament of this country.

    For, these two joke disorganizations continue to seriously disgrace and demean this country with their brand of cannibalistic, backstabbing and backbiting politics; with their brand of “give me a cut back” corrupt, and infernal politics; and their brand of visionless, intellectually bankrupt and discredited politics.

    PDC

  35. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Balance; you said above:
    “Who knows Pacha- as I tried seemingly unsuccessfully to point out to Are-you-There in another post; perhaps this infighting in the political parties might be a form of self-destruction which might inadvertently usher in a new system of governance without having to resort to cracking heads or shooting people.”

    I think I intimated in an earlier post that I agreed substantively with aspects of your post above. But I continue to have grave reservations as to the benefits to Barbados of a likely degeneration of the BLP mixed with the known instability and ineptitude of the DLP in a cauldron of further chaos replete with the effects of the current instability-engendering stabilization programme, INADVERTENTLY producing a situation that could in any way lead to a stability in the short term that could move us away from the spectre of “cracking heads and shooting people”.

    Ultimately your scenario could lead to the plus of new competent political players coming to the fore, but in the short run with new entrants preaching disparate policies in a mix of instability in both major parties, your solution appears to be a prescription for instant failed nationhood from which we would have to climb for decades to get back to our stable status and reputation of say five years ago.

    Read it a few times and you might understand what I am saying.


  36. Sorry, haven’t quite gotten up. What I meant to say is that you should never use a Semi – Colon in front of a Verb.


  37. “David, my grammar is very bad, but I do know that you should never use a Semi โ€“ Colon in FROM of a Verb.”

    Is this a case of Pot call the Kettle?

  38. Truly amazing !!! Avatar
    Truly amazing !!!

    @ David
    Of course that first line should read “BLP apologist TENNYSON JOSEPH”…


  39. @ Islandgal
    No! I am just calling it as I see it darling… It is just one of those simple rules in grammar one ought not ignore.


  40. @ Islandgal
    Now, I am no expert; never claimed to be. But I do know that eduaction is an ungoing process. And I would only ask that Daivd also redirect me as he sees fit. And guess what…. we’re all here to teach, learn, and inspire others I hope.


  41. @Pacha
    Why comment on the man’s “merit” if you know nothing about it? What are yours besides fanciful contributions to BU? Whete have you helped or are helping?
    We just enjoy belittling people’s merits, contributions, skills and education even whwn we have no evidence to prove us right. Then we upset that our current MoF struggles with numbers and truth.


  42. Agree with your last comment Pacha, contrary to enuff’s rebuttals even the old lady living through the line has a view.


  43. @Pachamama
    “In the nation newspaper of Monday, January 06, OSA is quoted with a determination that the policies of his political leader were a mere โ€˜gimmickโ€™. ”

    Coming from a qualified Economist such as Arthur, I totally agree with the statement


  44. ARE-YOU-THERE -COULD A MORE CAREFUL READING OF THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW WITH RICKY JORDAN AS PUBLISHED TODAY’S NATION CAUSE US TO RE-THINK OUR PERCEIVED NEGATIVE POSITIONS OF MR ARTHUR’S PORTRAYAL OF MS MOTTLEY PROPOSAL OF AN EMINENT PERSON’S GROUP TO BE GIMMICKRY
    Y. WHAT IS YOUR ANALYSIS OF THE INTERVIEW?


  45. Wunna got to be kidding again and Again about change of goverance….that step only kills the body .the first and more important step is the decapitating of the head then and only then can barbados talk about new goverance once and for all..


  46. What OSA said is open for debate although some truth can be attributed as one (OSA)who have visited and inhabited the ” house of politics” for so many years my only question to him would be “what where you thinking” especially after the last election having took to the stage and having embraced and gave the support and endorsement of MIA as a leader. the word ” gimmick” in reference to her idea sends a stining message which is hard to understand…..


  47. Some will WIN (DLP)…. some will LOSE (BLP)… Some of them will sing the BLUES…. But it goes on and on and on on on on …..lol….


  48. @ Enuff
    We comment on people’s merit all the time. We are not and will never be minded that Erskine Griffith or anybody else in Barbados is beyond reproach. Neither are we connected to the installation of a backward personality culture which is drilled in the minds of Bajan children from birth. We even have problems with your god and when we go to your hell it shall be the devil, himself, against this writer. We hope this satisfies you.


  49. I ignore totally any contribution from Efyamama.Such a boar.


  50. @Pacha
    I am not disputing one’s right to comment on another’s merit, my issue is commenting conclusively without facts.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading