Adrian Loveridge - Owner of Peach & Quiet Hotel
Adrian Loveridge – Owner of Peach & Quiet Hotel

Perhaps more than many, I can empathise with individuals who have recently seen their business either fail or brought dangerously close to insolvency. In 47 years it has happened to me twice and in both cases, they were largely external forces which caused near personal financial catastrophe.

Of course, it is easy to attribute the blame to others but in my case, I can unequivocally state that both near failures, which occurred years apart, were largely caused by strike action in the United Kingdom. Both involving the National Union of Seaman. Personally witnessing bus loads, of what can only be described as pickaxe wielding thugs, destroying property and intimidating ordinary people simply wanting to go about everyday work and operating their businesses.

More than a decade later, it was the same union, blockading the English channel ports, which prevented literally thousands of our booked holidaymakers taking their hard earned trips.

Unless you have been a small entrepreneur and fully understand the work, sacrifice and dedication it takes to grow and nurture a business from nothing, it might be difficult to comprehend the feeling of sheer devastation you experience, when all those efforts unfold and collapse in front of you.

When we moved to Barbados, some twenty five years ago, and literally put our life savings into purchasing a derelict hotel, we were starting all over again. Not surprising, the local banks we approached were not overly helpful, regularly quoting those seemingly worldly phrases like – we were ‘undercapitalised’ or ‘over trading’. Little did we know then, that these ‘pearls of wisdom’ would come back and haunt the many supposedly ‘responsible’ financial institutions, globally, just years later.

In those early days, understandably, very few suppliers were prepared to extend us credit, and we will be eternally grateful to the handful who took the risk. In hindsight, the limited access to borrowing and credit was probably the best thing that happened to us. Growth of the business and enhancement of plant was funded by positive cashflow, which left us entirely debt free.

Therefore, while I have absolute sympathy for those enterprises which have faced critical financial challenges recently, you are forced to ask if Government is now operating a two tier system of collecting taxes, when a relatively small company can amass outstanding debts of close to a reported $10 million, across four Government agencies.

Something has to be fundamentally wrong.

Our own experiences substantiate this inequity, after finally receiving partial payment of outstanding VAT refunds overdue for as long as three years and seven months.

Clearly any administration has to adopt a balancing act of trying to create a climate where enterprises are encouraged to grow and help soak up unemployment. But at the same time, they should not escape their regulatory responsibility by allowing selected corporate entities to avoid or even evade paying taxes for long periods of time. Ultimately, the businesses which are playing by the rules, despite all the adverse trading conditions, have to pick up any deficit.


  1. Even at this the most critical stage the economy of modern day Barbados has ever approached,government still holds fast to its unwritten Moto.In This Country Its Not What But Who You Know.There seems to be a right of passage for politicians to pave the way for friends,family and outside women to the exclusion of all others .Those who choose to play by the rules just fall through the cracks,while the connected ones suck the blood out of our country.Just how much can a people take?


  2. Jack Warner had to resign his post and place in parliament,and now is adamant that he will contest the ensuing bi election.Gumption and big time balls is what these politicians are made of,and we can’t find a way to lock up not one of them. Instead we defend party positions.


  3. Minister Donville has been talking up a storm, let us see when the dust settles if he delivers.


  4. The vast majority of people in Barbados have the opportunities to overwhelming support a party – the PDC – that is fundamentally about liberating all people in Barbados from the bondage of TAXATION, and that is critically about making sure that there will be one less scourge that has long been thwarting the further growth and development of this country.

    Indeed, the People’s Democratic Congress (PDC) has evolved twelve (12) fundamental principles concerning money and its uses in Barbados ( all of which – except one – we are unable to at this stage expound on). These fundamental principles are instructive in helping as many people as possible that are capable of understanding them understand why – to some extent – Barbados has reached this most undesirable stage of irreversibility in the quickening of the pace of decay and decline in the entire production, distribution and exchange affairs of the country at this juncture in its historical development.

    First, for a definition of money – money is a non-tradeable, non-consumable, usable, measurable physical commodity – and the only one of its kind in the world – that carries denominations for purposes of its users paying for its uses out of their own income, payments and transfers.

    Fundamental principle ( 9) – Money can never be TAXED – only nominal incomes, payments, transfers in the commercial industrial realms, despicably evilly, however. Basically it is the threat of use of force and the use of it by the relevant persons acting in the name of the state/government that are employed against thousands upon thousands of people in Barbados in that manner – and of which these said thousands will ordinarily continue to likely/fear irrationally – that nevertheless help to cause these said people to hand over what is in fact portions of their own properties, or what is in fact portions of the properties of companies or some other organizations, ie, regular countless portions of their incomes, payments, and transfers, to the government eventually – on an ongoing basis – based on a counting “system”, a money circulation “system”, a financial “system”, an ideological “system”, a political “system”, a sociological/socialization system, etc, of Euro-centric Westernist subscriptions evolutions altogether.

    In ordinary circumstances, where persons, businesses and other entities would have been stolen from/robbed out of their incomes, payments or transfers – to some extent – by number of thieves/robbers, like how the state/government has been doing over the years, they would have long started to rationally react violently destructively, or would have sought non-violent means to defend their remunerations against such diabolical acts of stealing robbing. But, in this case of TAXATION in Barbados, the PDC dares to posit that the major reason why there has been no wholesale violence destruction used against the state/government by the people for the government’s stealing what is theirs is because of some utterly false ideologies that some of these TAX victims – esp those that are leaders in the society of some degree of prominence, have come to falsely accept, and that have helped to fashion their social indifference to government’s mass thefts of portions of their remunerations, eg ones like how TAXATION is used to deliver social services, build roads, schools, hospitals – and which would be there for the uses of these TAX victims via TAXATION of parts of their own incomes, payments, transfers – says the false ideological “system”. WHAT SINCKLERITE ARTHURITE RUBBISH!!

    Anyhow, just as the state/government cannot tax physical things like land, roads, buildings, motor vehicles, it cannot TAX money which is also made up of physical things. It cannot TAX money wheresoever it is! So, even though persons are forced to hand over monies to the state/government – it is THE USE of those monies on the basis of the incomes, payments, and transfers targetted by the state/government, that these evil wicked DLP/BLP governments wish to have and do have eventually have – and NOT just possession of it. A serious analysis of such circumstances does show that government therefore NEVER makes uses of any persons’, businesses’ and other entities’ incomes, payments, transfers, but makes uses of the monies handed over by the relevant people, since there is no individual ownership in money . This is the unvarnished truth versus the downright lies put out by Sinckler and Arthur!!! So, by these DLP/BLP Governments at first inheriting from the colonial administration in Barbados certain unchecked political strategic powers and positions, and then later on over the years using them to expand most demonically, in a fascistically hitlerizing manner, illegal TAXATION laws and policies for the use of money – in concert with the aforementioned “systems” – mean that many individuals, businesses and the other relevant entities have been made to suffer such remuneration losses to an evil wicked government as a primary result of their using those same powers and positions and “systems” to intervene most diabolically in those processes where the users of money are being made to pay for the use of money out of their incomes, payments and transfers – TO TAX them.

    PDC


  5. “ones like how TAXATION is used to deliver social services, build roads, schools, hospitals – and which would be there for the uses of these TAX victims via TAXATION of parts of their own incomes, payments, transfers”

    PDC…………….i am still curious to know how your party will pay for the social services such as healthcare, education, roadworks, construction, welfare, busfare, etc, etc,………….the money has to come from somewhere.

  6. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    Adrian

    Are you one of the Hoteliers who made a large contribution to the Barbados Labour Party elections campaign of 2013?


  7. It will be useful if commenters discuss the issue of facilitating small business and business in general and not be distracted to trivialize the discussion. It seems if there is one thing the DLP and BLP yardfowls have in common is that they believe he should be criticized and booted about like the proverbial political football.


  8. CCC
    Shame on you. Adrian Loveridge hotel Peach and Quiet has less than twenty rooms where is the money coming from to make large contribution to the Bees? LOL on LOL. Mind you listening to the crap Adrian spews to the easily fooled on BU you would think two thirds of Bdos tourist income is derived from the 12 or so rooms at Peach and Quiet. Think again the place isnt named Quiet for nothing.
    The Hilton and Sandy Lane is jokes to P&A if you listen to AL. The landlords who rent rooms to friendly Myrie like Guyanese and Jamaicans gymnasts bring in more foreign exchange than Adrian. They are open for business year long. Peach nad Quiet is not..STEWPS!


  9. @Devin aka 1000 pounds of blubber

    Another lackey.


  10. @ Loveridge
    Why? For how long? Has government not been doing this or has been asked to do this forever? Why should ‘small business’ have a high priority access to the public purse? Is this not corporate welfare? Does corporate welfare represent a higher moral position than social welfare? Is your faux position not located within the neo-conservative construct that allows so-called business people to trade on their failures in the ‘market’ by insisting on an insurance policy from the ‘people’? Just asking!

  11. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Pachamama,

    I cannot answer for all businesses, but if you look at our around 120 small hotels, the reason Government should level the playing field is that because there is less tourism leakage. Simply put, a higher proportion of the monies WE generate stays on island. We (P&Q) are not asking Government for anything, other than to pay outstanding VAT refunds on time and not expect
    to keep us waiting for 3 years and 7 months for a partial refund.
    When we do not owe Government a single cent, IS THAT SO UNFAIR?
    Unlike, other frequent posters on this blog, we have not had the benefit of massive taxpayer subsidies to keep our hotel going.


  12. In trying to be fair……………..if corporate welfare is extended to the large foreign owned hotels, i personally don’t see the reason why the small businesses cannot benefit if they are viable……………………..it still places the onus on the government of the day who are charged with collecting outstanding monies owed in taxes, etc. from the businesses who owe in the millions or billions, regardless. Again, government was not put there by the people just to enjoy the perks, they are expected to work and haul in tax dollars.


  13. Pacha likes this conversation because it points out the flaw in our system of government. A system where deep pockets can buy support from government.


  14. Then again, i better rethink those last few sentences……………………it is becoming very clear that due to the weekly and monthly closures of many businesses on the island that people abroad and now hearing about……………….the government may never be able to collect the taxes, VAT, NIS etc owed by the businesses that have already closed or are about to close………..it’s a lose lose situation all around, the government cannot collect taxes, they cannot pay returns………it’s sad.


  15. And Pacha, protecting small business does ot mean giving them money all the time BUT ensuring that business facilitation is efficient enough to ensure they can manage their cashflow, paying bills on time like VAT and honouring invoices for good/services supplied.


  16. @ Loveridge

    But you are asking government to protect ‘small businesses’. In fact the government of Barbados has protected business, especially big business for centuries. Just look at the sugar industry. It has received government support for over a hundred years. No business in Barbados can exist without government support – direct or indirect. Still it has never and will never be independent. The same is true of the tourism sector. All types of laws were passed to support your industry and yet you continue to ask government for support. When is this industry going to support the people – net net? Is it possible that the underlying political economy model is dysfunctional? When are the people going to benefit from these businesses we have supported, especially when the market has determined otherwise?

    You say that you want government to sell the hotel properties it bought (Gems) some time ago. I guess you would want them to sell at a loss. So it is alright for the people of Barbados to inject hundreds of millions into a dying industry when no one else in the so-called private sector would, but consistent with the cheap transfer of public goods to private interests elsewhere, you feel comfortable in making this illegitimate demand of the national government, yeah? If the tourism industry after over 50 years of government support and that of the people of Barbados cannot find a way to survive, we say let it die.


  17. David…………………i am sure the administration and it’s supporters will now enjoy the irony of such tactics, they may benefit from charging large businesses for corporate welfare but at some time the piper must be paid………..that time has arrived.


  18. Again, in trying to be fair……………….it just may be time to diversify from tourism, i don’t believe in killing it, cause if there is an economic turn around within the next 20 years……………I am sure the survivors of this recession will appreciate an added money earner, it’s not about us anymore, we have to think about how our descendants will survive on the island going forward for hundreds more years…………..leave selfishness behind.


  19. @ Loveridge & David

    You talk about refund of VAT. If this issue was not in question you will find some other cause cilbre. At its centre you both seem to believe that an artificial market should exist. A market that prioritizes white business interests. Can’t you see this model has not worked and will never work. And the government with which you are always appealing to for ‘coordination’ is itself incapable of even helping itself. This will not change only get worse. MAM and her people will be no better. Loveridge have you ever though about radically changing the nature of your ownership and the relationship of your workers to the ‘business’.

  20. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Pachamama,

    I am not asking Government for anything. other than to operate on a level playing field. What support has Government given to our business in 25 years? In fact you could argue the opposite, driving up unbudgeted operational costs in such a short period, to drive many hotels into near bankruptcy.
    Why have almost 40 hotels closed during the last 20 years, if they were profitable and Government was propping them up?

    No! I don’t Government to sell the remaining hotels at a loss, because I did not want them to buy them in the first place. Name another hotelier that personally met with the then, Prime Minister (Owen Arthur) and spent 40 minutes trying to talk him out of the acquisition. If I had been successful, I would have helped save the taxpayer an estimated $400 million.


  21. @Pacha

    Two things, at the moment tourism is all we have to pay the bills which means we cannot kill it.

    The other issue which we always get back to is what is the role of government.

    The final issue, is any system of government without flaws?


  22. I think that why more and more businesses will fold this year is that for the duration of this government’s occupation of power, it has asked businesses to hold strain and help to keep Barbadians employed.

    The employers by and large tried but when there was no improvement in the management of the country as they expected, they have lost confidence. Hence the high lay offs. The employers can no longer keep using up the savings of the companies just to keep people employed. Why, even the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre has had to lay off staff with all the election talk of no layoffs.

    The cost of doing business in Barbados is very high and we can expect a lot more businesses to fold as the government continues to bury ts head in the sand that we are on the right track and that there is no other way.

    By the way, Adrian, a lot of the 10 million debt that that company owed is made up of interest and penalties.


  23. If the media got down to the real job of informing the public and not one of being politically bias maybe things of such importance as tax dodgers would take precedant as it impact on the economy is one of devastation. …..as to you Adrien it is good to see you make mention of the corporate tax dodgers.However some crticism should be level at you as it is only after you felt the pinch by long delay by not getting your refund that you find it plausible to point a finger at the corporate leeches

  24. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Prodigal,

    I understand that, but it should never have been left to mount up to that level.
    We recently paid roughly $37,000 in corporation tax for our last financial year. I asked our accountants if we could withhold it pending repayment of outstanding VAT (due for 3 years and 7 months). He said NO! and if it was a day late, we would be charged 5 per cent of total amount plus 1 per cent interest per month on any remaining balance. $10 million is a lot of interest and penalties for a small business.


  25. @ David

    Your same argument was made by the defenders of the now near dead sugar industry – it is all we have. You are too conservative. Even at a time when warning signals are all over, you still want to harken unto the past. The tourism industry can take us no further!

    @ Loveridge

    Why don’t you look to another model if you really want to succeed? Why don’t you involve your workers in the equitable ownership of your enterprise under a trans-national co-operative? Why do you think you alone should be boss?


  26. Again Adrian you should ignore ac’s comment which shows that she is clueless about your role over the years in Barbados as a social commentator, a role which you have had to pay dearly.

  27. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    ac,
    that was not intentional. I believe that ALL corporate entities who do not make acceptable arrangements to pay taxes due should have their names and amounts printed annually (or twice annually) in the media for ALL to see.


  28. @ Loveridge

    The government of Barbados is sovereign. As a sovereign it centainly has the power to NOT pay its bills. The government of Barbados can’t get businesses to pay reparations after 400 years of slavery, colonialism and neo-colonialism. Can you help us to get this long owed back pay?


  29. Adrian…………..that is what i have been saying, it is the governments’ responsibility to print the names of the delinquent tax dodgers in every media forum available in Barbados…………don’t wait until they are $10 million in arrears and facing bankruptcy, print each name large and small. Maybe AC can now encourage the government to do this, it is there jobs and no one should have to encourage them, before all the businesses close, except those own by Trinidad.


  30. Pacha………………don’t wait for reparations money, European countries are broke, the likes of the Rothschilds liquidated their assets since 2008 because they knew what will happen, as is happening now, and hidden all their liquid cash…………..stop waiting for money that your great, great, great grands will be the ones to benefit from, maybe.

  31. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    Pachamama,

    That means Government owes me twice. The VAT and the fact that my family were sent here as indentured servants in 1685.


  32. @Well Well

    Not that both parties are complicit in not dealing with this issue of delinquents.

  33. Adrian Loveridge Avatar
    Adrian Loveridge

    David,

    I am surprised that no-one has brought up the issue that according to this week’s Barbados Business Authority that PriceWaterhouseCoopers will not sign off on Almond Resorts audited accounts. Again, is there something we are not being told here?


  34. @ Loveridge

    There are people this government owe more money to for longer – Barrack. And we think he has a more persuasive case than yours. You, for example, could not run your business without an airport. So because the government owes you a few dollars in VAT that is not reason to blackguard them because at the same time they keep the airport open for you. Not to talk about all the services the people of Barbados provide to you guests, without pay!


  35. @ Loveridge
    You always try to minimize the cost of chattel slavery by equating it to servitude. No matter how we try to draw the vast differences you will not heed. In addition, we have told you before that people like you whose ancestors were in servitude got legislative consideration. Africans never did. Lastly, that represented a self inflicted wound – white on white violence. No racism was involved only maybe tribalism. Therefore, yours is a ‘misguidance’. These two things are as far apart as day from night.


  36. @Adrian

    Of course there is, what it explains is the delay in consummating the transaction. It will not happen without clean financials.


  37. Adrian……………….why would the Barbados government owe you for the British government kicking out your ancestors because of ethnic cleansing. or because they were criminals??………..don’t try to muddle the waters, you were getting people on your side, don’t try to spoil it.


  38. Adrian…………..have you tried as I believe you are of Irish origin, approaching the British government for reparations because the Irish suffered at their hands???……………..it has nothing to do with enslavement of Africans, and the descendants of Africans are not responsible. You are making me feel that incorrecto is peeping out involuntarily. Now you are never going to get that VAT refund, should have been able to control yourself better, you definitely just screwed the pooch.


  39. David……………both parties are complicit in not keeping due diligence and oversight with regards to delinquent companies, i just learned from one of my elders that they just live for the moment and don’t ever see the consequences that lie ahead………….these are now the consequences.


  40. We are taking the discussion offtrack. If SMEs are responsible for 60 to 70% of employment/GDP then government has a responsibility to facilitate this class of business.


  41. @ David

    No! Not forever!


  42. Not even so-called big businesses in Barbados can survive for long without depending on government. This state of dependency must end. If you want to be capitalists, be real capitalist. Face the market on its terms. But instead you talk about competition when in fact business people always move towards monopoly or oligopoly.


  43. @Pacha

    Barbados is an economy which rest on retail and distribute its domestic economy and tourism and international business to earn forex. Some dismantling will be required.


  44. Well Well,

    It is not just a question of where the money will come from. It is also a question of successfully re-educating and re-orienting many persons’ beliefs, attitudes and positions towards it. It is about making sure these persons properly know about its imperial history. It is about these people clearly understanding the evil motivations behind contemporary and modern government’s imposition of TAXATION. It is about they rightly knowing about the serious adverse political psychological financial effects of it upon all people in the Barbadian society. It is about what will replace TAXATION in this country. It is about the plurality of political governmental managerial financial strategies and approaches that will be put in place to facilitate/ to undergird – this very necessary transformation process – from the start to the finish. And a whole lot more other things so fundamental and important to the implementation of this vision..

    Anyhow to answer your question slightly. There is a National Non-Repayable Productive Loans Scheme that will be put in place by a government that the PDC shall be part of, that will mainly have a recycling function, a saving function and an investment function. This scheme and its counterpart – a National Non-Repayable Non-Productive Loans Scheme – which will also be put in place some after the first one and which will also mainly have a recycling function, a saving function, and an investment function – will together be helping make sure that money – which will be more ubiquitous then than now – is effectively recycled across the length and breadth and about the nooks and crannies, around the villages and terraces of Barbados, ABSOLUTELY LESS the psychological mythological foolishness and pervertedness that there is MONEY DEBT and that it has to be so-called repaid to financial institutions the principals plus interests, or that the latter have to give interest to depositors, so that is MONEY DEBT (remember that what the relevant financial institutions owe to depositors are portions of saved income, saved payments, saved transfers, and not money, but INCOME, PAYMENT, TRANSFER DEBTS).

    Instead of using the notion of MONEY DEBT to significantly recycle money from the possessions of persons and other entities into financial institutions, and/or external income, payment or transfer costs to recycle money out of financial institutions into the possessions of persons and other entities, we will make sure that a system of returning actual money that was earlier given out of the schemes goes back to the schemes for the beneficiaries of the productive or non-productive business done by the providers of it, and in such ways therefore these schemes will be being seen by many people as means through which the beneficiaries of business done or done with will be using the relevant financial institutions to give the providers the money to be used by them.

    Whereas qualifying individuals, households and businesses will have use of money from out of these schemes in the aforegoing described ways and will also give monies via the schemes to persons it owes money to, they will only be able to use the equivalent amounts of monies out of these schemes – less their own contributions to the costs of running them – for productive non-productive purposes and to the extent that they will have each previously in each succeeding year contributed to national income, payments and transfers, the government will only have use of monies from out of these schemes in the aforegoing described ways, will also give monies via the schemes to persons it owes money to and will ONLY be able to use the successfully applied for monies – less its contribution to the costs of running the schemes – in any administrative, social, productive or national emergency contexts, and to the extent of the limits of its yearly budgets, which themselves will not be allowed to go pass use of 30 per cent of the monetary base of the country at the time, in any given year.

    As it stands now too, if the present size of the government were to be as big as or little smaller or bigger than it is now any time a coalitional government that the PDC will be part of comes into office, then that size will be drastically reduced and its budget made to reflect such a significant reduction in the size of the government.

    All financial institutions will have to be subsumed under these schemes and will have to make investments in productive activities in order to make productive remunerations to give to their partners – formerly workers who shall own them – and to give to non-owning-investors in them.

    The schemes will be government and private sector managed.

    PDC


  45. @David

    SO WHAT? BEFORE YOU THOUGHT YOU COULD NOT DO WITHOUT SUGAR, AND WE MANAGED. TIMES ARE CHANGING AND WE MUST TRY TO STAY AHEAD OF THAT CHANGE, NOT MERELY RESPOND TO CIRCUMSTANCE. FOR DECADES OUR COST OF PRODUCING SUGAR WAS GREATER THAN PRICE, AND WE PERSISTED PUTTING THE COUNTRY IN DEBT AND BEGGING. IS THE SAME GOING TO BE SAID ABOUT TOURISM 100 YEARS FROM NOW?


  46. Pacha………….you gotta remember the size of the islands population and when the economy fluctuates, that is where you get companies inability to stabilize their bottom lines and the problem of handouts from the purse of the taxpayer……………….it also happens in the larger economies, but most of theirs is due to theft, scams and greed.


  47. “There is a National Non-Repayable Productive Loans Scheme that will be put in place by a government that the PDC shall be part of, that will mainly have a recycling function, a saving function and an investment function. This scheme and its counterpart – a National Non-Repayable Non-Productive Loans Scheme – which will also be put in place some after the first one and which will also mainly have a recycling function, a saving function, and an investment function”

    PDC…………………how will your schemes be funded???


  48. @ David

    We know that you boys are not exposed to military generals like Sun Tsu – military strategist about 2500 years ago. He said that a good general could put his army on death ground. Because it is on death ground that soldiers show superhuman abilities. We believe that everything around us is based on military doctrine. We have enough confidence in the people of Barbados that if we told them the truth – all the truths – they would refuse the status quo and skillfully avoid perdition. You are too wedded to the status quo!


  49. The present administration is now charged with finding another money earner for the island, until tourism can/maybe be revived, clearly it’s not working………..and in the present economic situation is becoming hopeless……as I said earlier the taxpayers did not put these leaders there just to enjoy the perks and practice their little schemes and scams at the taxpayers expense………….yall might want to check the below quote to see what Kamla-Persaud has finally realized since the Jack Warner debacle.

    “I want to make it very clear, the only persons that control me are those that belong to the electorate and the citizenry of Trinidad and Tobago, no one else,” she said.


  50. Just change Trinidad and Tobago to Barbados and send the quote on to Stuart and his band of do nothings.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading