Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Stuart and Arthur, our political leaders in waiting
Stuart and Arthur, our political leaders in waiting

Whether you believe that the political manifesto of a political party is its intent to rollout certain policies if elected or that it is a social contract becomes an exercise in semantics. It is currently the preferred option which political parties have to outline a set of promises which they hope – if elected – to implement. In a growing democracy the electorate should have a reasonable expectation that a political party’s record over time should demonstrate the level of credence given to manifesto promises.

What is reprehensible is that with 10 days left to the 21 February 2013 both political parties continue to withhold manifestos (proposals) from the electorate as if it were a big secret. This is happening at a time when our tiny island continues to face unprecedented challenges posed by the global state of affairs. Both major political parties obviously see political tactics and gamesmanship being more relevant.  What does it say about us?

Until we achieve a higher level of maturity how we conduct political campaigns in Barbados the current reality which see political parties entertaining the party faithful and others looking for a good laugh will continue. Why would an intelligent electorate, and society, not demand from the candidates that they communicate their proposals to inform debate in the country well in advance of the election date? If ever there was a time in our history when we needed our politicians to depart from the same old same old the time is now surely. What does it say about us?

One is therefore left to ask, what has been the objective of the political campaigning so far? If both political parties and the handful of Independents have the national interest at heart, why not rush to deposit well articulated ideas and suggestions in the public space? The corn beef  style of campaigning described which served a purpose in the 60s and 70s cannot be relevant now. The irony is that more people, especially the youth, are becoming so cynical about politics and giving up their right to participate in our democracy? We have sunk billions into educating our people yet a significant chunk of our citizenry do not feel compelled to fully participate in our system of democracy. What does it say about us?

One manifesto item that will be of high interest to BU is how will both parties outline a media policy. This is a subject which is dear to the BU household. BU was conceptualized and given birth at a time when we detected deep hostility by Arthur and cohorts directed at the media in the 2006 to 2007.  In an information age it is evident significant institutional strengthening is required in the area of journalism and a supporting framework. Both parties should explore how resources can be strategically targeted at this segment which does not compromise its independence. It is 2013 and there is no vibrant body to represent media practitioners. What does it say about us?

Instead of discussing issues we have to witness politicians on both sides hurling abuse and otherwise vacuous statements at each other. However, in less than two weeks they will dress up in their finest Italian suits and enter the august chamber of parliament to assume the mantle of lawmakers. What does it say about us?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

255 responses to “Manifesto WATCH”


  1. @DavidB

    I am not being rude, but are you stupid or simply cannot tell a question?


  2. The manifesto is a document for reading and digesting. I got mine after midnight last night and have not read it through.

    But I, for one, am very pleased with what I have seen of the program to put Barbados back on the right path socially and economically.


  3. @Hal Austin

    I can also tell an insinuation from an honest information seeking question.


  4. Thank you Miller,
    For agreeing that the biggest GIMMICK of the BLP manifesto of 2013 is found on page 40 of the Weekend Nation of 15 February , 2013 .

    C – clearly
    L – leroy
    I – is
    C – chequeing
    O – owen

    Bang….bang !

  5. Adrian Loveridge Avatar

    David,
    I note that the DLP have removed the “Write Something’ option from their FaceBook site and have deleted many comments of those posing questions.
    Is this democracy?


  6. Putting Money in Owen’s pocket and that of Hallam Nicholls – Job #1


  7. I think this strategy of the dems to try to hurl dirt at the blip at this stage will likely backfire.

    They are the goverment of the day; they are not in opposition. They had 5 long years to prosecute anyone suspected of wrongdoing .

    So, to come a few days before an election at a time when they ought to be focussing on their plans for the country and instead try to distract the electorate seems inappropriate to say the least.

    They are already being accused of being too negative and personal while the other party is focused on the agenda for the future.

    But we will wait and see. Tonight, tonight!


  8. The old Bajan saying “What sweet in goat mouth does bun he in de tail”

    The BLP is trying to pull the Republican trick – promise tax cuts without specific spending cuts and claim that you will usher in tremendous growth. JOKE- in a small open tourism dependent economy, you cannot encourage increased consumption unless you have foreign exchange pouring in. IT IS NOT SUSTAINABLE especially with your major tourism markets in recession.
    This is pure TRICKERY. Can anyone on this blog tell us where the expenditure cuts will come from?
    The BLP cannot have it both ways- If as Mascoll likes to say, you have “expenditure switching” – Then the increased spending by consumers must be matched by reductions in government spending. The biggest expenditure in government is wages and salaries.
    AH HA! Now you see why the BLP has gone silent. If they ever tell Bajans before the election the painful and draconian expenditure cuts that would be made, the BLP would not win 5 seats. So they stay silent on the expenditure cuts and promise manna from heaven. Pure Trickery and Deceit – BLP style.


  9. The point is that opposition election tactics must be different from government tactics.

    The dems come across as though they are still in opposition.


  10. DavidB on February 15, 2013 at 3:57 PM
    I think this strategy of the dems to try to hurl dirt at the blip at this stage will likely backfire.
    —————————–
    David,
    That is the same refrain you used in 2008 !
    But when you saw the evidence at Haggatt Hall as to why ……..Barbadians do not want back Owen Arthur…..you changed your tune !

    Well in 2013 it is the same Owen Arthur coming back with a ” co-leader in Dale Marshall ” last time it was Clyde Mascoll – and on both occasions to the exclusion of poor Mia Mottley.

    So the narrative must be ……exposed the FRAUD that is Owen ARTHUR !

    DavidB , I am positive that you agree that the contents on page 40 of the Weekend Nation of 15 February 2013 is a very good place to start. The beauty about that is that all of the acts on that page were perpetuated by the man who the BEES has brought back as a leader in 2013.

    I am sure you too CRINGE at the SIGHT and THOUGHT of that !


  11. I do not concur – Arthur tries to cherrypick his record. He is trying to trumpet the economic growth which occurred during the late 1990’s and compare it to the last 5 years when clearly the prevailing circumstances were considerably different.
    The BLP supporters keep saying do not mention the last 14 years but every BLP platform speaker nightly talks about the economy before the global economic downturn. Is that not looking back also?
    Arthur is not a new candidate coming with fresh ideas- many issues which he criticises are issues that he allowed to develop. However, he now has all the solutions for everything and worse yet, some on this blog are gullible enough to believe him.


  12. I do not concur with DavidB ‘s assertion. Arthur is a fraud and his sidekick Mascoll is intellectually dishonest.


  13. You don’t know me, so you do not know what my response was in 2008. Obviously, the strategy worked then because it was dirt that the opposition was able to dig up on the government.

    It was not a government that had five years to do something about the information it had on its opponents as is now the case.

    And you know something? Peter Wickham said there was a 1% improvement for both parties in the last week of the 2008 campaign (i.e., after Haggatt Hall). In other words, the die had already been cast and the much vaunted event had no effect.

    But, hey, you guys think it swayed voters, so go ahead and let’s see what happens.


  14. DavidB
    I am thrilled to let you know that the DIRT you refer to in 2008 is still around in 2013……..you could have called it by its proper name……OWEN SEYMOUR ARTHUR !


  15. @fracutred and !
    a fraud, and dishonest intellect and a thief (in your words) are giving the DLP and its leader a serious run for their money in this elections…possibly even maybe standing a chance at retaining government after losign it only 5 years hence.

    What does that say about you all, the DLP and its campaign straegy with respect to winning elections, fighting for the people, communicating with the country and trumpeting your competence, past accomplishments and vision for the future???

    Think what you want about the BLP…but…something has to be clearly wrong with Barbados the DLP or both for you all to be in this political position when clearly the other side “isn’t wanted” and in many cases has been “found wanting.”

    What mirror image do you have of yourself?

    Just Observing


  16. @ Observing

    Prance around buddy boy. Not long to go now before Fruendel removes Owen’s head politically. A lot of wailing and crying Thursday next. However it’s going to take a while before the hiarchy of the BLP and the candidates themselves realize that the entire BLP campaign was nothing more than a show designed to make 3 people very very wealthy. One is former PM, one is deal broker who loves the BWA and foreign bank accounts and the other is a lawyer who thru his son has a lot of slot machines.


  17. @ Gabriel

    After having heard Bobby Morris’ comments on the 5.30 evening news on VOB, I am prepared to accept your rumour about a mighty wind force.

    24 to 6 you say?


  18. Fractured BLP
    I agree with you, the dirt the DLP spoke of is still around, minus, DT, you fooled the voting public once, i think it is foolhardy to try fooling them twice. Where is the nunerous forensic investigations the DLP were to carry out immediately after winning the elections in 2008? the Hardwood project, the abc over-runs, the $ 75,000,00 cheque? I,m ashame the the DLP could back 5 years after they were in government and try fooling the people with the same things all over again. We the electorate, want to know what the two parties will do for us over the next 5 years, not what the BLP did 5 or 10 years ago. To date the only party that seem to have a plan, is the BLP, the DLP has still not stop canvassing since pre 2008


  19. How do you guys think Freundel’s comment about people who need money getting it from drug dealers and criminals is playing?

    I understand what he was trying to say, but he said it very badly.

    People are going to remember that statement like how Lammy Craig’s Douglas Leopold Phillips statement is etched forever in people’s minds.


  20. fractured BLP
    the dlp is catching at straws, imagine the dlp head of NOW telling Arthur to reinstate MIA to position she never had, yet she is not calling on Michael LASHLEY to reinstate her to the position SHE had and was dismissed.


  21. david B or like how the 75thousand dollar cheque OSA is forever etched in peoples mind


  22. Fractured BLP …you are so fractured that you are all over the place and not making any sense AT ALL! Take a break, chill and take a pill. Come back after the 21st.


  23. @ac

    And the people still prefer Owen over Freundel!


  24. So Chris Snickers has done what OSA asked him to do, to apologise to June Fowler. Lawd what a bunch these Desperate Lunatic Party members are. They are sooo pathetic, Fumble is PLEADING with the people to vote for Sealy, imagine PLEADING to the people, sounds like a man clutching at straws indeed.

    DavidB …I heard his stupid comments about people who need money should go to the drug dealers, such stupidity. He is putting more nails in the DLP’s coffin. He should be asked to SHUT his mouth, it is running like a sick person’s behind.


  25. I was in B’town today and I heard a man tell a woman, “don mine you, you like a bare pooch cat.” I hope Sinckler live long enough to degrate saying those words to a decent God fearing LADY like June Fowler. The morals of this country gas sunk to its lowest.


  26. What you DEMS do not get is that the cheque affair is already “priced in” to people’s perceptions of Owen.

    Thus, with all his flaws, he is still regarded by far as the better option to lead Barbados at this time.


  27. david B we shall see . WETHER Jesus or Barrabbas!The people also made a choice there and they were wrong.


  28. AC are you saying that Fumble is now Jesus? Lawd what wunna gine say next? First it was Obama now Jesus?


  29. I’m still trying to understand this $75,000 cheque thing after nearly 10 years since the cheque was deposited and drawn and 5 years since it was exposed to the eyes of the public by David Thompson.

    Caswell Franklin, on this blog, made an attempt to explain it but even then It was not clear what had actually happened and who was the culprit and if it actually pointed to illegal wrong doing on OSA’s part. Based on Caswell Franklin’s input, the basic facts seem to be as follows;

    1) A managers cheque of $75,000 was deposited on Owen Arthur’s personal account at that bank about 2 weeks before the date of the General election of 2003.
    2) Owen Arthur withdrew the $75,000 in cash on the day of the Elections
    3) Owen Arthur won the Elections
    4) All the above transactions were private and presumably legal.
    5) a bit over 4 years later, on the eve of the 2008 elections, David Thompson, used the cancelled Manager’s Cheque of 2003 at Haggatt hall to claim dishonesty, etc. by Owen Arthur. A claim which it would appear that most people, including me accepted. It should be noted that the transaction and cancelled cheque should have been a priveleged one outside of the public domain and would only be available to someone with impeccable connections to the bank and to the CLICO group, ergo DT.
    6) Caswell claims that the whole affair was a trap for a greedy OSA but do the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom support that.

    Could Caswell or anyone else explain what a leader of a party would most likely be doing with $75,000 in cash on an election day?
    Could it be that 75,000 dollars divided into 30 constituencies represents about 3,500 dollars per constituency or chicken feed when one considers the legal activities of transportation of aged voters and other logistical expenses that must take place on election days? Given the 100 dollar inducements that have always been rumoured to be standard practice on Election day for both political parties and which no one has ever been able to document, if one assumes that the 75K was for legal payments for election day logistical expenses there does not seem to be much room for such payments.

    While at it, could they also explain why Owen Arthur would appear to have cashed the entire $75,000 and not leave some of it for his personal use on his personal account if he was as corrupt as DT was then claiming and which is still being claimed today on this thread today?

    Does the whole incident, if anything, suggest a machiavellian mind and intent on the part of DT even more so than a lack of integrity by OSA?

    I only know the aspects of the story as given on this blog by Caswell. Perhaps he and others can correct me where I’m wrong and point out how the cheque incident actually indicates a serious flaw in the area of integrity by OSA that was outside the normal practice of election campaign financing by both parties in Barbados.

    What is really needed is a total revamping of the electoral financing system with Government footing the entire bill for both parties and having no tolerance for parties or individuals who thumb their noses at the law. Perhaps it is not too late to hope for such changes in the next silly season when, with likely islandwide access to the world wide web, the partisan political messages can be easily and cheaply beamed out to individual households and interest groups and there should also be another plus where messages could be vetted by an independent body for certain aspects of their content.

  30. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David:

    I have some reservations about the BLP’s energy policy going forward as summarized in the manifesto.
    Although it is, on the face of it, intended to bring some relief in the cost of electricity to business enterprises and domestic households still on the grid without impairing the financial viability of the BL&P its needs some serious tweeting if it is to satisfy the twin objectives of reducing the COL and at the same time synchronizing with the policy of supporting a ‘green and sustainable’ economy.

    A cap or governor should be placed on the amount of electricity subject to any “controlled” pricing mechanism. We cannot have a ‘free-for-all-situation’ for domestic consumers in which wasters of energy can avoid financial penalties for their profligate habits.

    A cap or limit must be placed on the amount of electricity a notional ‘average’ household can benefit from this ‘ease-in-the-pocket’ proposal. We should not incentivize people to use more electricity than they absolutely need. Households which require in excess of, say, two hundred of kilowatt hours to run should ask if there are not areas to really cut back on.

    The BLP must also establish a policy position regarding the number and fuel consumption habits of the ML & MP vehicles in this small tropical land. Why do we need so many large engine capacity vehicles using expensive imported fossil-based fuels?


  31. islagal i know that would attract ytour igrunt side. you are so predictable. Well on that score maybe you can say that OSA is Barrabas .


  32. AC sweetheart….I know you so well that I knew who you were talking about. You are now insulting your dear Jesus and Obama.


  33. check it out . i don’t know why it is so hard for you to understand that a cheque of such amount even though written to OSA was to depositede into the account of campaign tresury and deposited into the campaing personnalbank acount even if OSA was in charge of such affairs , Putting it into his personnal account stinks to high heavens.


  34. @ac

    The choice is between competence with some flaws on the one hand versus a bumbling procrastinator.


  35. @Miller

    Agree with you. The policy feeds a growing consumption behaviour which does nothing to resolving the real issue.


  36. david B where did you comeup with such an insulting solgan”competence with flaws” wuh dam there is nothing competent about the likes of OSA who in good times did not have the vision to put barbados on a self sufficient path.but rather gavethe people a false sense of security for which they are now paying.

  37. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | February 15, 2013 at 7:54 PM |

    Mind you, my contribution is merely constructive criticism and feedback to the BLP key policy-makers who read this blog.
    The recommended adjustments should be taken into consideration if the BLP is given the chance as the government to implement the manifesto proposed policy in the coming months.

    But we shall await the DLP manifesto position on fossil-based energy costs to make a fair comparative analysis before further comment.


  38. @ Check It Out!

    It is clear that some people think that something fishy went on and some saw the transaction for what it was.

    No way the withdrawal of $75,000 in cash on election day could have been for any other purpose but to finance election day activities as you rightly pointed out.

    The point is that there is/was a negative perception among many about the cheque. Yet, against that backdrop, people still favour Owen. That’s what I meant when I said the effect of the cheque has already been “priced in” to people’s perceptions about Owen.

    Which brings me to the DEMS advertising strategy. I don’t know who their consultants are, but I get the impression that they are party insiders who are wearing backyard avian blinkers.

    Why would they think that the ad from 2008 on Page 40 of the Weekend Nation could possibly be relevant now?

    People made up their minds about this, one way or another, since 2008.


  39. @ millertheanunnaki there is no effective practical energy policy that can be implemented in Barbados by any political party.

    Energy consumption will decrease when the decline in forex negates the ability to purchase oil and gas.

    Bajan politicians are reactive not pro active.


  40. Sound like wunna gettin friten.
    Read the Barbados Today Editorial page 2. ‘lets hear the experts”


  41. To Check It Out and DavidB:
    This is simple. If Michael is my enemy and Peter is my bosom pal and I gave Michael $75,000.00. Do tell me how much would I give my pal Peter? How about $3.3 m?


  42. @Tell Me Why

    Precisely. That’s another reason the ad makes no sense and has no advantage for the DEMS politically.


  43. The DLP Manifesto does NOT disclose where it was printed that we can see.


  44. I see Bees and Dees are out canvassing the Muslim vote, with the prime minister making a special journey to a local Mosque. Has he made this journey to local churches? So diversity is now the answer to our social problems?


  45. Michael Carrington and the PM Stuart gets along better than most, no doubt this is Carington pandering to the minority vote in his constituency by leveraging the relationship.


  46. @Adrian.
    You asked “is this democracy”?
    No its the D’Mockeryacy .


  47. David | February 16, 2013 at 2:10 AM |

    The DLP Manifesto does NOT disclose where it was printed that we can see.
    __________________

    you notice that too? oh Dear, oh Dear.

    i could be wrong but where in the DLP manifesto does it deal with the cost of living?


  48. To the DLP bombardiers, what happen wid wunnah bombs that wunnuh was supposed to explode last night at the meeting that was gine devastate the whole of the BLP? Wunnah fuse did damp?

    The point is that the closer it gets to election day, the less credible any revelations of wrongdoing would be. It is a flawed strategy anyhow, but I was looking forward to the fireworks.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading