Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Minister Denis Lowe, Ministry of Environment, Water Resources and Drainage

A good indicator to test if the silly season has arrived is to observe the accusations lobbed by BLP and DLP acolytes at BU. A characteristic of the political partisan is the inability to accept reasonable positions. The only position is a party position. It does not take any high degree of political acumen to discern who fit the description politically partisan on BU.

In 2010 BU posted three blogs which highlighted our concern about Minister Lowe’s known close association with philanthropist and owner of Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary Peter Allard. BU is surprised at the little traction the story got knowing that politicos from both sides visit BU. Bear in mind both parties have been preaching the need for good governance i.e. transparency in public office.

The three blogs posted 1) What Is Your Connection To Peter Allard Minister Lowe? 2) Need For Freedom Of Information And Protection Of Privacy Legislation In Barbados. Need For Greater Security At Our Local And Overseas Missions. Need For Integrity Legislation. The Follow Up On Minister Denis Lowe – The Secretive World Of Peter Andrew Allard Part VI 3) Minister Denis Lowe, Why Come To The Table With Unclean Hands? – The Secretive World Of Peter Andrew Allard Part VII asked questions of Minister Lowe. So far he and others have ignored our queries but we have not forgotten. Time is longer than twine!

Improving transparency in the way government does business was a key platform issue in the last general general election promised by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP). Can Barbadians honestly say that the government has delivered?

Those who attended the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) political meeting on the weekend would have been shocked to learn about Cabinet minutes in the possession of Kerri Symmonds. It makes ordinary Bajans wonder if we cannot have confidence in the integrity of the system at that level of office, what is left? Perhaps a commission of inquiry is warranted into the many Cabinet leaks of late. Some may say the government has made itself vulnerable by the actions of ministers of government who have disregarded the principle of collective responsibility; a tenet of the Westminster system. This betrayal of the system merits investigation.

The purpose of the leaked Cabinet minutes was to expose an unusual transaction which Minister Lowe and his government entered with the Bynoe brothers. It appears government has agreed to swap 19+ acres at Bagatelle for 9+ acres of land at River Bay owned by Proppa Pork Bynoe. The result, younger brother Bynoe will resite his metal recycling operation from Cane Garden to Bagatelle. Senator Symmonds who has been stridently prosecuting the matter on behalf of the opposition has raised several concerns:

  1. No environmental study was town
  2. No T&P approval was sought
  3. No proppa communication with residents in the area
  4. No communication from government on details of the deal

Leader of the Opposition Arthur added to the intrigue of the transaction by suggesting the land at Bagatelle was an addition to the original deal which featured Fort Denmark in St. Peter.  The fact that the Bagatelle land maybe worth millions because years of  scrap metal to be found on the site perhaps explains it all.

At this stage what is required is for Barbadians to hear the government’s view of this transaction. It boggles the mind that with a general election on the horizon the government does not see the need to practice Communications 101. Why give the opposition so much fodder to feed on?


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

120 responses to “Land Swap On The Down-Lowe”


  1. @enuff

    However which way you slice it a ‘leak’ satisfies a narrow definition of transparency. In other words, yes the leak has open the land swap to public scrutiny but at what price to the integrity of the governance system?

  2. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | August 15, 2012 at 4:18 PM |

    The governance system under both administrations has already lost its integrity and acceptance by a large majority of citizens. Just look at the amount of people who have lost confidence in politicians and the two party system. This perception would soon turn into a reality and blow to democracy when the number of voters who do not turn up at the polls healthily exceed the number of votes received by anyone party. The leaders have to carry a lot of blame for this sad state of affairs in a country that boast of a very high levels of attainment in education and professional vocations.


  3. @miller

    Then the carry-on from your comment should be what?

    Let us lobby for a system which encourages leaks or a legislative framework for doing same with the built in advantages to doing so?

  4. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ David | August 15, 2012 at 5:35 PM |
    “Let us lobby for a system which encourages leaks or a legislative framework for doing same with the built in advantages to doing so?”

    We concerned citizens have been doing just that: “lobbying for a legislative framework”.
    And we have been promised these basic requirements for a modern enlightened democratic state with an educated and “sophisticated’ electorate, or so we think. Promises of Integrity legislation and a FoI Act have been made in both parties’ manifestos over the years. Even this current administration guaranteed that Integrity legislation would be on the Statute Books before the end of this parliamentary term. What else can we do but keep on keeping on and being walked all over by the dirty boots of dishonest politicians.


  5. If the majority of the people DO NOT VOTE then the idea of majority would be trashed (unless it is applied to the majority of the voting public even if that public is a public of sixty people …!)


  6. “Then the carry-on from your comment should be what? ”
    that you as chief blogger has an obligaton to conduct yourself in such a manner to convey the impression to fellow bloggers that you are impartial. you must not be perceived as criticising one leak and ignoring another. leaks are leaks.


  7. @balance

    Will repeat this for you, make your comment and we will make ours ok?


  8. After reading the book ” Three men together in a boat and a dog” ….I could not help but remember how sometimes people can be so easily duped by a lesser mortal. Senses when strained tends to hallucinate..even kill each other…leaving the dog to get them for food…..survival


  9. Will repeat this for you, make your comment and we will make ours ok?not at all sir, not until you are consistently impartial but i must add, you do try at times.


  10. apolitical/non-partisan is a myth.


  11. “This is the DLP biggest problem which seems insurmountable since David Thompson’s terminal illness and demise”
    but Mr Miller, for all his communication skills, i ama wondering to know how Mr Thompson would have explained away the CLICO squandermania and his apparent involvement.


  12. There is obviously more flowing under the bridge regarding this land swap business with the Bynoes. What is interesting is that Paul Bynoe from the mouth of Arthur himself was violating the T&P regulations at Cane Garden.

    What we have at Bagatelle is not a dump i.e. metal to remain in the earth for years as what now obtains but an operation which will shred the metal for export. We have as usual a lot of politics being played out here.

    Did BU see a piece of equipment in use at Bagatelle to begin shredding or was that at the old plant? The reason is that if we go by the article in the Nation yesterday the government gave permission for Bynoe to move his equipment to Bagatelle BUT not to commence operations.

    The issue here is for government to confirm if there was a land swap, it has denied, the other issue is whether mining old metal from Bagatelle represents an environmental issue for residents and Barbados.

    We need a clear timeline of what happened here.


  13. In the Know

    why did the PM summoned a meeting with those civil servants in TP and E{D, among others as it had related to the B’s issue. Dennis Lowe you need to come clean with the Barbadian public. Any body I know that i can influence cannot vote for you. R u really trained in religion and were.are you a preacher. Lord have mercy on your soul.


  14. David wrote “the other issue is whether mining old metal from Bagatelle represents an environmental issue for residents and Barbados.”

    I think (just my opinion) Leaving the metal in the dump would be a bigger environmental problem as it could leach toxins into the ground water.

    Shredding metal can be done safely and the idea of removing it from from Barbados is a good one.

    River bay should be owned by Government and should be left undeveloped so it could be used as a traditional spot for Excursions.


  15. @Then the issue becomes more about transparency in the decision making.


  16. @David,

    In my minimally educated view, the metal recycling business is a veritable “gold” mine if the owners are just average businessmen.

    ‘Transparency” David?…..The windows in your house will have to suffice.lol


  17. Who owns “River Bay”?


  18. @David of BU “In 2010 BU posted three blogs which highlighted our concern about Minister Lowe’s known close association with philanthropist and owner of Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary Peter Allard.”

    Why do you call Peter Allard a philanthropist?


  19. @Simple

    Search the web, he has given money away.


  20. Yes. But to whom? And for what purpose?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading