Unity And Stability Is What Barbados Needs Most Now

Submitted by Dave Random

Leader of the Opposition Owen Arthur (l) Former Leader of the Opposition Mia Mottley (r)

If there is stability in the Barbados economy and in Barbados – at a time when there is rioting in Greece; other parts of Europe, in America and in the Middle East – it is because there is stability within the ruling Democratic Labour Party.  That has as much to do with the steady-hands of the present young Minister of Finance (in extremely difficult times) as it has to do with the confident innovative leadership-style of the present Prime Minister.

In contrast, the disunited Barbados Labour Party held its Annual Conference over the weekend (October 28-30) which (based on reports) ended with the BLP even more divided than before the Conference.  If under it present leadership and given the type of politics being practiced, they cannot manage their own affairs, how can they manage the affairs of Barbados?

If you go in the supermarket, you are likely to run into someone still complaining to anyone who would listen that the atmosphere was like a funeral service in the Anglican Church and since pictures do not lie [Barbados Today Special Edition] it is mind-boggling how there could have been so many empty seats, when the delegates (who obviously stayed away in ‘loud-silent protest’) were all carefully handpicked, for a reason, leaving many to conclude that they agree with the approach taken by Mia Mottley and support her crusade to change course and the path that BLP is now on.  How can you fault people who believe that there is hope and that better is possible?  The article by Sir Roy Marshall published in the Sunday Sun of October 30th 2011 – under the caption: Strengthening Democracy [1] should be compulsory reading for all Barbadians.

If there is one thing about Barbadians, it is that they respect democracy and seriously resent seeing anybody get “unfair.”  Since everything about the BLP’s recent Conference was pre-determined, with there even being elections without voting – it was foreseeable that the only perceived excitement would have been the speech by Arthur, except that it is equally well known that he has a trademark way of repeating himself and forgetting that he said the same thing many times before.  And, judging from what I heard on VOB, Sunday was no different.

But there are a few things, which Owen Arthur said (based on newspaper reports) that can only be described as political comedy.  He made reference to a BNOC combined profit of $110 million and used that as the basis for his announcement that a future BLP government will give a $35 million ease on electricity bills.  This is pure smoke and mirrors because while he seems determined to continue his welfare politics of the past – he carefully side-stepped the real issue and that is that he left a massive BNOC debt of some $80 million, which still has to be paid.

Arthur alleges that the economy is in crisis and getting worst, yet made the announcement that on returning to government, he will ensure that persons earning $80,000 or less will pay income tax at 20%.  Does Barbados need more welfare typed Owen Arthur politics of the past or a new politics for the future?  This brings me to the main point I want to make.  Arthur said that he is in no contest with anyone for leadership.  But how could anyone in a modern Barbados, even contemplate following his model when his is the politics of the past and a style, which says that the leader must be feared?

Was it the apology of a man who (after a whole year) had nothing new or progressive to report?  After 14 years as leader of the BLP, and after wrestling power from Mia Mottley on October 18th 2010 and now in a recession where it sent home card-carrying BLP workers from its headquarters – it would seem that Owen Arthur told party members that the BLP is NOW functioning ‘better than ever.’ Unbelievable, because the BLP is divided and more so now, than any time in its history.  Then, as expected, Owen Arthur’s trademark attacked on Mia Mottley came!

It would appear that at a meeting held at the Bay Primary School (prior to the Conference) she made the patriotic called for a Joint Select Committee of both House of Parliament to discuss the matter of Transfers and Subsidies.  But Arthur shot down the idea.  The reason is simple: if Sinckler gets its right, Arthur is no longer relevant.

It is in Owen Arthur’s personal interest for Sinckler and the DLP to get it wrong or to appear to the public to be getting it wrong on the economy.  Arthur wants no talk about unity or cooperation in the national interest because his thinking seem to be that there can be no Barbados without him.  It is that divisive and tribal approach Barbadians hate most about politics and wants to rid the country of. Now is the time for national unity and shared sacrifice but Arthur wants to rule by fear and favour, even in Opposition.

If he cannot unify the BLP, how can he unify Barbados?  How can the BLP be ready if there is such disunity, with the present leader attacking the past leader, every opportunity he gets?  In contrast, despite there being social unrest all over the globe, the Barbados economy and the the country is stable with the DLP, which is demonstrating that Barbados is a society and not just an economy.

120 thoughts on “Unity And Stability Is What Barbados Needs Most Now

  1. seeker my apologies for misinterpreting your comments and anthony it is my view that the turmoil in the dlp fuelled by mr sandiford’s intransigence caused them to lose the 1994 elections and not the 8% cut whch was generally even if grudgingly accepted by civil servants including me as necessary to save barbados from devaluation.those devastated by the significant decresaes in their severance pay were too small to make an impact on the outcome and the dlp’ites grumbled but did not mind. please note that overall the dlp still held their own garnering over 40% of the national vote.

  2. in 1994 election they got 38.3% of the vote. won 8 seats. In the 1999 election got 35% of the vote and won 2 seats. In the 1986 election blp won 40.4% of votes and got 3 seats. The small swing can greatly change things in certain districts which are hotly contested

  3. Both Greece and Italy have opted for technocrats to steer the ship of state through these perilous stormy waters especially in the Eurozone financial rough seas.
    The loud mouth “skinning-teeth” politicians seem to be running away from the heat of the engine room where the problem needs fixing.
    I wonder if Barbados should opt for such a leader at this juncture instead of continuing with the clowns who don’t the difference between an economy and a society. What about Richie Haynes’ copy cat Dr. David or grasshopper Clydie?

    Leave it up to the technocrats! Let them implement the inevitably harsh structural adjustment programmes to hurt the middle class and the poor. They can easily be sacrificed once implemented and then thrown to the lions to appease the masses.

  4. miller the an the problem with the present crop of technocrats trained and certified free of cost at the taxpayers expense is that their advice cannot be trusted having been mostly installed because of political affiliation or because those not so favoured still are willing to sacrifice their intellectual for selection on some non-performing statutory to obtain public recognition.

  5. Balance Nov 10th 5.27 a.m
    In 1994, the voters did not vote for the BLP, they voted against the DLP because of the turmoil within the party. In the next general elections, if the DLP loses again, the same thing will happen, the voting public would vote against them but not necessary for the BLP;it so happens that there are only two major parties, so voting against one will mean voting for the other; the lesser of the two evils. What we need is a new party putting their foot into the door by contesting about 5 to 10 seats and hope to do like Britain and being asked to form a coalition government

  6. Hi there, I found your web site by means of Google even as looking for a comparable topic, your site got here up, it seems to be good.
    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hello there, just became alert to your weblog via Google, and located that it is truly informative.

    I am gonna be careful for brussels. I will be grateful for those who proceed this in future.
    Many folks will be benefited out of your writing.

  7. Asking questions are in fact good thing if you are not understanding
    anything completely, except this paragraph provides good understanding even.

  8. Really????!!!! Is this all you have to offer? We non yard fowls are tired of this political game you are playing. Neither the BLP nor the DLP is satisfactory. Nauseating, all of you!

  9. Unquestionably imagine that which you stated.
    Your favorite reason seemed to be at the internet the easiest thing to take into accout of.
    I say to you, I definitely get irked even as people think about issues that they just don’t realize about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing with no need
    side effect , folks can take a signal. Will likely be again to get more.
    Thank you

Leave a comment, join the discussion.