← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Owen Arthur, Leader of the Opposition (l) Mia Mottley / Photo Credit – Nation Newspaper
… They are attacking Gadaffi’s body i.e. his coterie of Generals, advisors; hangers on all the flotsam and jetsam that pilfered from the Libyan people… Tighten the noose slowly until … Closer to home Mia is using that strategy in politics against Arthur, she is not going after Owen but she is going after his “body” … GWP… Attack the body and the head will fall  … – Sargeant

.

In less than a year Barbados has witnessed a chaotic political scene to describe it mildly. The death of a young prime minister and his wife voted as his replacement in St. John, Prime Minister Stuart’s taciturn demeanour and the perception in some quarters that he is not fully in control and last but not least  the deselection of Mia Mottley by her parliamentary colleagues and the elevation of former Prime Minister Owen Arthur.

Speculation is rife about what what happened at Roebuck Street to spur the revolt which saw Mia Mottley being replaced by Owen Arthur. Again one might assume given George Payne’s surprise support to Owen Arthur that Mia messed up in a big way. This is Barbados and at some point one can expect to be fully informed about what many Barbadians regard as a ‘Brutus’  move by the 2010 Barbados Labour Party parliamentary group – with the exception of MPs Cynthia Forde and Rawle Eastmond – meted out to Mottley.

With a general election looming the two major political parties will want to resolve perceived leadership issues. The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) appears on the surface to be in better shape than the BLP but the adage a week is a long time in politics will give Prime Minister Stuart little comfort. The BLP’s internal challenges could potentially get messy if BU is reading the signals being sent in the public space correctly.

A few weeks ago Opposition Leader Owen Arthur made the declaration that he and Mia were in healing mode. What made the statement interesting at the time was the absence of Mia’s input from the communication, it was reported she was out of the island. BU was surprised at Mia’s response when she eventually commented claiming in essence ignorance to any peace pipe encounters with Arthur. Mia’s shot across the BLP bow last week about the need to reform the constitution of the party and her threat to challenge for the Chairmanship of the BLP at the next AGM to spearhead the effort if necessary has created a challenge for Arthur. Already party supporters are echoing disappointment by questioning her timing, others have suggested she had the chance as Chair of the party to move the reforms forward. In the coming days and weeks Arthur’s response to Mia’s recent salvo will be eagerly awaited. All may agree this matter if not managed well has the potential to divide the party.

At the heart of the matter for BU is the inference made by Owen Arthur back in January 2010 – in the Tyrone Barker Report – that Mia Mottley as Opposition Leader misused “the special trust fund the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) set up to meet the cost of elections”. As far as BU is aware Mottley has not responded publicly to the charge. Barbados needing to protect its reputation as a rumour mill there is talk about malfeasance making the rounds. It is a matter Mia should address head on at some point or could it be Arthur knows something which has not been landed in the public space to date?

The other issue which Mia Mottley must manage is the perception by some that there is an entitlement on her clan’s part to occupy Ilaro Court. No politician can be seen as perfect and whether such a perception is big enough to cause a drag on her aspiration to be the first female Prime Minister of Barbados is best left for the polls.

The question for the political pundits is whether the BLP significantly reduces its chance at the polls with a disaffected Mia Mottley in its fold.  The easy answer is yes. BU is prepared to state at this stage that the BLP will not give itself the best chance to win the next general election unless the Arthur Mottley tussle is neutralized.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

219 responses to “The Mia Mottley Factor”

  1. Just Only Asking Avatar
    Just Only Asking

    @Crusoe

    If you said that the Drug Service did not need an overhaul then you were not following the rising cost of running the service, go get your facts for the last 10 years, that is the expenditure and place them here.


  2. @Crusoe

    My advice to Arthur, Mascoll and Mottley is to hastily but surely bury the hatchet and come to an agreement and genuine one, on the way forward.
    ********************
    If they “bury the hatchet” where they may be disposed to bury it, the homicide squad may have to be called. If the two principals opt to “kiss and make up” someone will have to “eat crow” and I don’t see either of them doing it, but stranger things have happened.


  3. Poor Jenny M. You just can’t stomach the fact that Mia Mottley has widespread support in this country can you?
    If I were you I would spend some of your enormous reservoirs of rage and envy on getting people like Kerrie Symmonds, Maria Agard, Jerome Walcott and Santia Bradshaw elected to the House. They need all the help they can get and you need numbers to secure a Government.
    That’s the problem with all you political diehards. You always think you know what the people want, but really you only encouraging them to need the things you want.
    Time will tell, girlie. Hope you won’t be eating crow when Frun Frun rings the bell.


  4. Random Thoughts | May 29, 2011 at 9:40 PM | * “Tina Roach | May 29, 2011 at 11:17 AM | Everybody knows who contributed to the BLP losing”

    Wait Tina????

    I din’ expect to see you here.

    I thought that you were raptured last Saturday.

    I WONDER WHY YOU WOULD THINK SO
    /////////
    When all the talk done, elections will take place and the people will vote and that will be that so cut the crap


  5. @Sargeant,

    Lol. That is bad. But, if what you say is true, then egos are more important than the good of the country?

    Hey, maybe I am being naive, but…….if egos are that important, they should not be in those positions.

    Or should all leaders have large egos? Although egos have ruined many a nation…


  6. Owen Arthur says the DLP government managing the Country by leaping around in the dark. I like the quotes by Owen. Do you remember when he described Darcy Boyce as an artic river; frozen at the mouth?

    Leaping around in the dark: an act whose consequences cannot be predicted.


  7. Strange comment by Adrian Hinds regarding the nomination in Ch. Ch with Duguid. Surely Duguid won even though Arthur had another person as favourite. So the people of Ch.Ch. West got what they wanted despite leadership views. It would suggest to me that the democracy worked and people got what they wanted. Joseph has an article in paper this morning about this same issue. Interesting reading and juxtaposed is an article by DLP appointing their last slate of candidates. Absolutely no voting by the members not even a delegate. all will be appointed by the council, no wonder the St. John selection was behind closed doors. Did any real voting take place? I mean the Dems ain’t even pretending to have a democractic approach, what a misnomer for a name Democractic Labour Party.


  8. @Bajan Truth

    Joseph needs to write about REDjet and the obstacles Jamaica and T&T have put in its path which impacts affordable travel in the region.


  9. No need to envy Mia. I give her credit where it is due. But on this current issue I see her for what she is..a desperate politician who will stop at nothing to fulfil a family’s dream! She does not even show the tact and discipline required of a mature political figure that she should be at this stage!!! May be I should pity her!!!


  10. The resolution advanced at the BLP’s conference by Mia Mottley in 2010, was a reaction to a number of malpractices that were evident within the administration of the party.

    Subsequently, the call was reiterated ‘ONE MAN ONE VOTE’ as a means of addressing those wrongs which are well known to all honest citizens .

    This call desires to reach out to society and show people of all social classes that the BLP as an institution is making an effort to weed out the elements responsible for its bad image, by addressing the concerns expressed by the public .

    This effort is worthy not only of public consideration but also of the leadership of the BLP, and should not be dismissed as simply mischievous .Certainly if it can be achieved it will add to the BLP as an additional plank to its contribution of modernization .

    How can former Prime minister Owen Arthur ignore this call? Is it because of the voice who makes the call or the validity of the call .

    Rather than Owen Arthur confronting this issue as a leader and with a degree of solid scientific intellectual power, he digresses into emotive and illogical reasoning about 20,000 persons going to Kensington Oval to vote in a party election.

    His party does not even have 10,000 voters in its membership . More ridiculous, is to paint a picture of one station for such and exercise.

    Such a suggestion is tantamount to being ludicrous. See the objective value of the call and act accordingly and not as an arrogant leader who has no respect for the intelligence of the people.


  11. It is for the rank n file to step forward and have their say. The argument of one man one vote is a good one and will not go away, however, Mia Mottley is not now a good messenger for this case. We can never fully disassociate a person from their actions and words. So that when Mia endorse the current selection process by restating it during Arthur’s nonmination in 2008 and then again when she accepted the results of the same process that made her LOTO, she should expect her sincerity and integrity to be questioned now that the same process was use to strip her of power. Is it certain that she whould win popular support to be the Bee’s political leader?


  12. jenny m perhaps if mr arthur could have recognised as you have that the interests of the party is bigger than the man ; then rather than saying he was not interested in leading and accepting leadership which he says he does not want, he would have farsighted in his vision in signalling to supporters that he was firmly behind miss mottley whom he had annointed as leader by appointing her deputy primeminister and whose virtues he so elegantly extolled to the press in her defence from time to time.all mr artur and his cohorts and blind partisan followers like you have succeeding in doing is consigning the blp to the political wilderness for a long time for it is the floating vote which decides the outcome of elections in barbados not the partisan political supporters and the floating vote loathes parties who wash their dirty linen in public so cursing and demonising miss mottley and her family tree is not the answer for it was not her who caused the public rift.trying to balance.


  13. Pappy P and Balance I am afraid that your simplistic minds are too limited to address any thing intellectual or substantial. Stop trying to be what you are not, Throwing words around does not impress anybody. Deal with substance! What nonsense is this, you speak as if one of your tin gods or goddesses can determine the future of the BLP.


  14. jenny m, if my simplistic comments are untrue then prove me wrong- was it not mr arthur who anointed miss mottley- was it not mr arthur who defended her integrity when her character was under question about her sexuality- was it not mr arthur who made her deputy prime minister- was it not mr arthur who told the people of barbados in a press conference with that familiar smirk of his that he was giving miss mottley a chance to enhance her skills and be more rounded in response to charges that her removal from attorgeneral to the ministry of economic affairs could be seen as a demotion- unlike you, i am not privy to the machinations of the blp but her removal from office and the manner in which it was done was like mascolls from the dlp a disgrace. mr arthur owes miss mottley an apology.


  15. jennym- i forgot to add that politicians in barbados need to be reminded and held accountable for their statements by the local press like cnn and fox do. but, alas that is asking too much of a fourth estate seem to be contented with doing very little to get to the bottom of issues or are afraid to mash political corns.


  16. @Jenny M,

    Most of your contributions contain a brew of tasty poison .The dangers in material submitted from your type, is it has a degree of intellectual face value but boggles the mind of those who don’t view you as a suspect .

    I think I understand your TIN POT mentality .You know the truth, but believe society is too ignorant to know and that is responsible for your cynicism .

    It is public knowledge that the Hon. George Payne corrupted the old backward delegate system, is this true or false?

    Why would Owen Arthur who faced charges of corruption in the last general election want to ignore the need to address this wrong. Did George Payne unilaterally manipulate the system without Arthur’s assistance?

    A nation publication also reported from St. James South Constituency a number of Constituents who said they were not members of the Barbados Labour Party but their names were included on the delegates’ list at the last annual conference. Why would Owen Arthur, a former Prime Minister attempt to preserve an old delegate system with glaring loopholes.

    The effort to reform the BLP and modernize our nation must be fought for by every genuine Barbadian or else we might be exposed to greater dangers if the BLP is returned to office without even explaining their silence on corruption within.


  17. @Balance
    Owen does not owe Mottley an apology. She was removed by a subset of the same people and using the same process by which she became LOTO.

    Does this sound like a Mia Mottley that has a problem with the parliament party team picking the leader?


  18. This clip says it all. This is Mia the reformer? Her recent actions and behaviour reveal crass opportunism more than any thing else. By the way the enlisting of members for any nomination is nothing new. There should be rules to deal with this so that the those who have money to pay people to join up cannot control things around here. sometimes people with money sit in the background and fund those they want to win various posts and nominations. This has happened for years. Surely Miss Mottley would have known about this in her twenty years! As General Secretary for all those years what did she do about it or did it suit her….just asking.


  19. I have listened to this clip again. Imagine here is a woman who essentially is saying that the Parliamentary group is paramount and that its decisions should be respectfully rubber stamped by the constituency Branch members, an extreme view just a short while ago. Now she has no respect for its decisions once they have have not gone her way. This says it all. Thank God for modern technology!

    For those who doubted. Now you see all of this fracas is just about Mia Mottley and her attempt to realize not just her dream but a family dream of more than a half-century. DO NOT BE FOOLED. IT IS NOT ABOUT YOU. IT IS NOT ABOUT THE MEMBERSHIP. IT IS NOT ABOUT THE MASSES!


  20. @Jenny
    It’s not modern technology. It is Adrian Hinds good sense of capturing comments from our politicos that will either paint them as consistent in their convictions or as petty and self-centered.

    The issue of one man one vote at the party level as it is at the natonal level and should be for picking the Leader of the country is one that I support whole-heartedly, however it is bigger than Mia Mottley and should not be percieved as hers, or that she is doing us and Barbados a favour. We know um aint so.


  21. Oh Dear Jenny M, you are grabbing at straws. What I see here is a Deputy Leader on the eve of a General Election supporting her Leader by asking his constituency branch to support him within the context of the rules as they existed.

    Do either you or Adrian Hinds really think that it would have been prudent of Miss Mottley to raise ANY issue other than this at that time.

    You would have poured scorn on her had she done so.

    Contrast this with the behaviour of Owen Arthur, who speaks through both corners of his mouth. One moment he praises Miss Mottley and anoints her as his successor, the next he holds a press conference to destroy her.

    C’mon, we the public have long since learnt to see through his Machiavellian machinations. Poor Owen he really didn’t want the job. Well why did he take it instead of calling the Parliamentary Party together to resolve their differences as any true statesman would have. Why was he not present when the Parliamentary Party reaffirmed Miss Mottley’s leadership. These crocodile tears are not washing with the public. We see them for what they are.

    What a pity that yesterday’s man now cleaves to the past to secure his limited future. He had a golden opportunity to put his party in a winning position by supporting the woman who was loyal to him for 14 years. He never could resist being the knight in shining armour could he?


  22. @ Jfor Jerome, You are catching at straws. This issue is not about Owen Arthur. This is about an overly ambitious woman who would stop at nothing to lead Barbados. Her comments at the Owen nomination were totally out of place, uncalled for and even bordered on disrespect for the members of the Branch. Owen has his faults but let any one that has no sin cast the first stone. However he has a good track record to stand on.

    By the way it was the Parliamentary group that grew tired of her after less than three years. THEY COULD TAKE IT NO MORE AND THEY TURNED TO OWEN. THEY KNOW MORE THAN WE DO. AS YOU AND SHE TRUSTED THE JUDGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY GROUP BEFORE DO SO NOW! STOP THIS BANDIT BEHAVIOUR!


  23. @JforJerome
    Yes it would have been inappropiate and political suicide for her to call for one man one vote at Owen’s nomination. However, on two occasions after she allowed and benefited from the parliamentary party team picking her and reaffirming their support and loyalty for her as LOTO.


  24. If we the people want to see the political parties democratise, in this case who do we go with, Mia or Owen?


  25. David, we seeing this ball as big as a breadfruit and we ain’t playing at nutton so, you can’t trick we wid dem sweet lollipops that you tossing up.

    What Mia or Owen what, only one person appears to be having a problem.

    This is simply a case of if the system isn’t working for you, then change the system.


  26. @Jenny M,

    My mother always said ‘A fool is counted wise when she holds her peace.’ You talk too much and expose how foolish you are!

    We are discussing two types of leadership in our system.
    There is no inconsistency in Mia Mottley’s statement. She speaks of those in Parliament who are opposition members following the system approved for choosing leadership.

    That falls in line with what she said in her statement after her ousting……. that she did not like the manner in which it was done, but she conceded to it.

    However the dispute surrounding the DELEGATE SYSTEM in which the ‘chairman’ of the party is elected is a different issue.
    She is proposing ‘ONE MAN ONE VOTE’ as the most democratic approach to ensuring that all members (not only those chosen as delegates) of the party exercise their inalienable right.

    IS THAT TOO COMPLEX FOR YOU?


  27. Pappy P it is too complex for YOU. If she conceded to the change why is she moaning and groaning every time she gets a chance. Get real! The BLP has been good to her for 20 years. She has been the golden girl. In politics every one knows that there are bumps in the roads ….for some there are many and for others few.
    As for the ‘one man one vote’ for the chairmanship we all know what is the genesis of all this. I AM NOT THE FOOL AND WILL NOT BE FOOLED !!!


  28. @Raw Blake
    De system isn’t wukking for Barbadians, and while Mia may benefit in the short term from the changes, Barbadians will reap the long term benefit as well.

    @David
    I wasn’t under any illusions about how deep the devide in the BLP is, and Bajan reporter is providing the evidence to match. Henderson Bovell attacking Clyde Mascoll, Bourne attaching Arthur and Simmonds, while bigging up Mia. Wuh I have to wonder wuh Mia promise dese two. LOL!


  29. Adrian Hinds | June 2, 2011 at 11:41 AM |
    @Raw Blake
    De system isn’t wukking for Barbadians.

    On what evidence have you determined this sir?

    According to many, Barbados has been blessed with more than its fair share of good leaders over the years that this now maligned system has been in place.
    ********************************************
    Henderson Bovell attacking Clyde Mascoll, Bourne attaching Arthur and Simmonds, while bigging up Mia. Wuh I have to wonder wuh Mia promise dese two. LOL!

    I notice you have not mention one David of BU who is more subtle in declaring his preference. 😉


  30. @Adrian

    Less than 2 years out the rabid political climate is emerging. The long knives have been drawn.

    Will repeat an earlier question: is the BLP prepared to suffer the consequences of Mia’s expulsion as some have suggested?


  31. @Jenny M

    Do a search of BU using ‘Mia Mottley’, there is no space you will find anywhere where Mottley has received more ‘licks’.


  32. David, a man or woman who ‘rugged’ will give licks and take licks. Go to your files you will see overwhelming evidence of this woman’s bullying tactics live!So imagine how she behaves behind the scenes. A number of people can tell you but they will whisper because they ‘fraid these bullies. THEY NOW WANT TO BULLY THE PARLIAMENTARY GROUP AND THE ELECTED LEADER! WHAT WILL THEY DO NEXT! IT BOGGLES THE MIND!


  33. @Rose Art | May 31, 2011 at 7:14 AM | Owen Arthur says the DLP government managing the Country by leaping around in the dark. I like the quotes by Owen. Do you remember when he described Darcy Boyce as an artic river; frozen at the mouth?
    ================
    Ha ha ha ha. . .he also referred to Stuart as being “politically comatose” earlier this year.

  34. Dr. Know-in the Know-You all should Shut up if you dont know Avatar
    Dr. Know-in the Know-You all should Shut up if you dont know

    Remember the television debates with Mia ?
    How bad she behaved each time ?


  35. Why is Owen Arthur so afraid of “one man one vote?” Or is he afraid that Mia is now more popular than he is?
    The man is a shadow of his former self – physically and mentally – with his future squarely behind him. Really I don’t know why he doesn’t stay home and watch his daughter grow up. Maybe he has a death wish or desires for martyrdom.
    Either way it is a great pity that his legacy will be clouded by his thirst for power at all costs – to the detriment of his Party.
    Time will tell dear Jenny, who the people really want and all your frothing and foaming at the mouth about some ludicrous family dream is not going to change that.


  36. If one wants to solve an issue, which is in this case, or ‘should’ be in this case, the BLP winning the next election for what ‘they’ see as the ‘good’ of Barbados in ‘their’ eyes, then one must assess the possible result.

    The possible result of a political barroom brawl in the BLP, at a time when the election is around the corner, would be disastrous for them.

    That is the negative.

    The other side of the coin is ‘legitimate’ concerns for how a political party should be run and the placement of suitable processes to ensure that, as it appears Mia is suggesting.

    The issue is, surely the persons at discussion could come to some suitable agreement…for the good of the country, if not purely least because a strong Opposition is a good thing?

    If not, we have the barroom brawl.

    I have said already and say it again, the real and main stumbling block to the BLP in the next election is the weak ‘middle order’.

    If they get that solved, then at least a quarter of the battle is done. The next step then would be a unified front, lastly to confront the issues.

    Unfortunately, it does not look to play that way.

    As I said already, Stuart should call snap elections, before the BLP can get its batting order and captaincy together.


  37. @Jfor Jerome , Anomie has struck your ilk so much that your comments carry the full taste of disrespect for those who have contributed to any thing around here. Your idea that Owen should just stay home is simply ludicrous. Should he stay home instead of coming to the rescue of the Party? HE WAS CALLED TO DO A JOB THAT THE PARLIAMENTARY GROUP DID NOT THINK MIA MOTTLEY COULD DO AT THIS TIME. TELL MIA THAT INSTEAD OF SULKING SHE SHOULD BE COOPERATING. HER UNGRATEFUL BEHAVIOUR JUST AINT CUTTING IT.


  38. @Crusoe

    Jobless growth in the USA recorded for May and fears and rumours of a double dip. PM Stuart must be ruing the opportunity he had to win an easy election.


  39. @David,

    Bajans need to forget politics for 1 hour every week and read about what is happening outside of Barbados.

    I hope the BU family will continue the political wars on BU but we should prepare for some difficult times ahead.


  40. No need to shout dear Jenny M. Now that is true anomie and pretty cheesy if nothing else.

    You say Owen was called to rescue the Party, but astute political observers can see through this PR exercise as a mask for the deal that George Payne thinks he has struck with Arthur to have Dale Marshall succeed him, making George the first puppet master of a sitting Barbadian Prime Minister. I wonder what it feels like to eat your own vomit, politically speaking of course.

    Not gonna happen dear Jenny. We are already paying the price of having to settle for a default Prime Minister.

    Crusoe is absolutely correct – either it is war, or an accommodation must be made. Owen Arthur is too smart a politician not to realise this. Hopefully people like you will not continue to spew your venom from the background so that the Party can get on with winning the next election. It is time you see beyond your own personal hatred and your cute little nose if you want your Party to succeed at the polls.


  41. Why dont we hear of any of the Dems going on a crusade to change their delegate system? They have the same system as the BLP has in place and none of their MPs are quarrelling and saying they are on a crusade to change the party’s constitution.

    I read in the newspaper this week that the DLP’s branches submitted names to the General Council for these persons to run as candidates. I did not read that they were nominated during any branch meeting.

    It just goes to show that Mia has an agenda to destroy the BLP. She had a pact with the dead king to give the DLP two terms, so her aim is for the Bees to lose this election and then it will be her turn.

    She had better remember how it turned out for Gordon Brown after he forced Blair to hold up his side of a deal they had made. Brown turned out to be the worst PM Britain ever had and sustained the worst election defeat.


  42. @Prodigal Son

    It just goes to show that Mia has an agenda to destroy the BLP. She had a pact with the dead king to give the DLP two terms, so her aim is for the Bees to lose this election and then it will be her turn
    **************
    You keep using derogatory terms to describe Thompson and the above is further evidence of that. I’m not sure what you hope to achieve by it but the operative word is “dead” and unless you in the BLP fear the “dead” you should focus on mending the rift that exists within your Party.

    Here is a “tip”; “the dead’ who is interred will not sink the BLP but the living corpses currently battling for the spoils of power will ensure of its demise.

    BTW what will you say about Mia if she and Owen decide to “kiss and make up”?


  43. The BLP actors are staging a play to lull the DLP into complacency.

    Mia Owen George and the rest of the BLP are all having a love fest behind closed doors.


  44. Those who underestimate the brillance and cunning of OWEN SEYMOUR ARTHUR, DO SO AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE

    TOM ADAMS DID NOT PICK OWEN FOR NOTHING


  45. What is obvious to independents is that Arthur, in a political climate made for opposition politics, he has been lethargic since resuming the role of political leader.


  46. @David,

    Owen has been “lethargic” to keep the focus away from himself.

    He will campaign in the next election with renewed vigor and vitality and a whole lot of money that will suddenly fall into the BLP coffers.

  47. Just Only Asking Avatar
    Just Only Asking

    Did any one remenber the statement owen made about mia that becasue of her life style that she would not be voted for as leader. That statement was made to destroy mia in the eyes of the public to pave the way for his return, and I think it has backfired on him and the man with the hat, the short man.


  48. @David,

    Noted. But as noted a few days ago on another thread, the job figures are not the only bad results, the house prices are falling also, which is reflective of a stagnant housing market and economy.

    Further, falling house prices put more mortgage borrowers into the red, by bringing another layer of mortgages into negative equity.

    This is part of what brought the previous crisis into reality, toegether with the inability to repay excess loans, due to both negative equity re excess leveraging as well as lack of marketability and hence revenue to fund loans.

    As noted previously, also a few days ago, it is glaring that the US is going to have to cut certain public spending i.e. military spending, to fund public infrastructure i.e. job creating, projects.

    These medium term infrastructur projects are necessary to provide enough of a long-term cashflow to fund jobs into the five to ten year and even fifteen year horizon.

    The thing is, this must also be matched by industrial renewal, such that industrial firms will be needed to produce bridge, train and other infrastructure materials, in the USA and not cheap imports from China / East Asia, that would defeat the purpose.

    The purpose is to provide enough of a multiplier across the board and indepth, not just provide an opportunity for large firms to make big bucks from design and engineering services, while sub-contracting significant production to the cheap East.

    We are looking at a very serious situation, double-dip which was suspected for a while now, does NOT describe the issue in a satisfactory manner.

    We in Barbados MUST go back to reduction of importation bill, an oft repeated sentiment on these Boards over the last ffive years, albeit ignored.

    As an aside, if you check the national press for prices, we are already seeing a significant drop in real estate market prices here, it will continue.


  49. Sargeant,

    Did not Hartley Henry referred to David Thompson saying that the king is dead. How am I therefore being accused of using derogatory terms to describe Thompson? You have a fellow DLP blogger who blogs in the worst way and says the nastiest things about Owen Arthur. I have never heard you condemn him.

    I do not believe in tit for tat but until I see you condemning your fellow DLP bloggers on the way they seek to denigrate Owen Arthur, pleeeeease give me a break!


  50. Donkey got long ear, but ‘e don’ like to hear ‘e own story.
    Bajan saying that is relevant today.

    At the moment, reading all these myriads of stories pertaining to Owen/Mia as a way to shift the focus on problems affecting the country. Now the propaganda shifting now to low gear (below the belt) with Opposition at Sea with his character assassination. We await Sagicor’s response/denial.

    The answer:
    People do not like to hear or accept their own faults.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading