Submitted by Nero (real name withheld by request of the author)

Former Prime Minister Owen Arthur

Perusing the Sunday newspapers there was the usual parade of items that caught the attention of journalists, and the ministerial agenda, Hon. Richard Sealy at a camp, Hon. Esther Suckoo opening a library, Hon. Steve Blackett at Cropover, Hon. David Estwick and Delisle Worrell laughing at dinner.  Sir Ronald Sanders’ article stood out in sharp contrast, a commentary on the Owen Arthur speech in Bahamas, prompting the writer to urge immediate action by governments for the sake of our future. It reminded me that I had got my hands on that speech, and I needed to read it.

I interrupted my viewing of the National Youth Forum, where our very talented children were performing confidently, to read the Arthur speech. The import and the stark incongruity of the state of the regional economies as a result of this global crisis and the beaming confidence of our children in our leaders to do more than provide then with a ‘voice’ but to work competently to guide the economic affairs of our country to provide them with a future, could not help but to have sprung to mind.

DIMENSIONS OF THE ECONOMIC CRISIS

Excerpts of the speech given by the Hon Owen Seymour Arthur in Bahamas June 2010

The Caribbean society has, throughout its history, lurched from one economic crisis to the next; and has in the process, developed special attributes of resilience as one of its major assets.

The recent experience has however been extraordinary, not only because of the scale and scope of the adverse effects which have represented the region’s share of the global economic and financial crisis. It has been extraordinary because, while dealing with those effects, most of its economies have had to contend with three other sets of economic forces which have imposed on them the obligation to carry out major transformations to their economic structure at great costs, or to make major adjustments that have significantly narrowed the policy space within which they operate.

To begin with, the onset of the 2008 global crisis found some Caribbean economies still in the midst of dealing with the consequences of the loss of trade preferences. By some calculations this resulted in a permanent loss of between 1% – 2% of GDP, the deterioration in their fiscal circumstances, a substantial reduction in their foreign exchange earning capabilities, and the lost of in excess of 60,000 jobs in the OECS.

Secondly, the start of the 2008 crisis found most Caribbean economies still groggy from the impact of the fuel and food prices crises that had taken a heavy toll on the households and enterprises across the region between 2006 and 2007.

The third set of forces has led to consequences that have been far more invidious.

By 2008, the Caribbean had in its midst some of the world’s most heavily indebted economies. At least six of the countries had debt that exceeded 100% of their GDP, with that of St. Kitts and Nevis approaching 200%.

All of the OECS countries had entered a programme arranged by their Central Bank to reduce their debt/GDP ratio to 60% by 2020 – a task that will entail such major expenditure reduction as to leave virtually no room for any fiscally-induced economic stimulation.

A similar programme to bring about fiscal and debt sustainability had also set in train in Jamaica and Belize where the debt/GDP also exceeds 100%. And the Government of Barbados committed itself in its Medium Term Fiscal Strategy to realise an overall surplus by 2015 in pursuit of policy to reduce its debt to more sustainable proportions.

The global crisis confronted these countries with a stark situation which amounts to a dilemma.

To carry out the programmes to bring about fiscal and debt sustainability they would have to pursue policies to reduce expenditure, which could in turn deflate the economy. On the other hand, to offset the worst effects of global recession, stimulation of the economy by fiscal and other tools was necessary. No easy answer can or has been found to such a dilemma.

IMPACT OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

The global economic and financial recession in 2008 therefore only added a significant and additional new set of economic challenges to a pre-existing situation which would itself have put the economies concerned to the sternest test.

In a most insightful presentation, “Global Economic Crisis: CARICOM Impacts and Responses”, Professor Clive Thomas has asserted that the negative impacts of the global crisis have been transmitted to the Caribbean through ten  major channels.

These include deterioration in the terms of trade, the volatility of exchange rates, difficulties in accessing trade credit and finance, the reduction in aid flows and the loss of opportunities for contract employment in North America.

He also cited financial contagion, as reflected in the collapse of the CLICO Financial Group and Stanford Financial Group, as one of the more damaging consequences of the global crisis.

However in terms of sheer financial volumes, the principal effects of the Global Economic crisis were transmitted through these major channels – the significant reduction in Direct Foreign Investment Flows, the decrease in remittances, and the substantial fall in foreign exchange earnings from the sale of goods and services that have occurred between 2008 and 2009.

Of these, the reversal of the recent trends in private capital flows is arguably the most significant.

Indeed, one of the major features of the pre-crisis performance of the Caribbean economy was the surge in private direct investment, principally to finance the development of new production capacity in the regional tourism sector.

Indeed, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean has reported that the volume of private direct investment to the region virtually doubled between 2006 – 2008, rising from US$5.9 billion to US$10 billion over the period.

The flow was significantly reversed in 2009, when the volume of FDI to the region plunged by 42.1% to $5.7 billion. Evidence of this major reversal is to be found in the large number of investment projects which have been temporarily halted or deferred in virtually every Caribbean country because of the global credit crunch.

There has also been a significant reversal in the flow of remittances to the region.

In this respect, it has been estimated by the World Bank that the value of remittances to the Caribbean amounted to US$3 billion in 2008. The Caribbean Development Bank’s Annual Report for 2009 however indicates that “some regional economies reported significantly reduced inflows of remittances in 2009”.

The regional tourism sector which had averaged annual growth of 7% between 2000 – 2007, recorded a fall of 7% in 2008, and a decline in receipts in the order of 6% in 2009. The offshore financial industry of the region was similarly adversely affected.

The global economic crisis also significantly impaired the performance of the major services and commodities export sectors of the Caribbean.There was also evidence of a sharp contraction in the region’s bauxite/alumina industry and the production of steel in Trinidad and Tobago.

Taken together, the reversal of the flows of FDI, the reduction in the value of remittances and the significant decrease in the receipts from the exports of goods and services led to the situation where the regional economy was effectively destabilized between 2008 and 2009 by an unprecedented decline in foreign exchange receipts, amounting to almost $10 billion.

This amount relates only to the shortfall in foreign exchange receipts. It however does not capture the other financial obligations that have had to be assumed by Caribbean States of late, such as the extent of the financing required to fix the CLICO debacle, or that which is needed to support the programme of structural diversification which still has to be implemented to replace production capacity that has been lost through the erosion of trade preferences. Neither does it capture the extent of financial adjustment that the respective economies have to undertake to successfully carry out the programme to restore fiscal and debt sustainability over the short and medium term.

My question is, in the midst of this economic disaster where are our leaders, where are the voices speaking to this unprecedented crisis, educating our people to its consequences, and more importantly, where is the articulation of a comprehensive plan, to match the magnitude of the challenge, and to discuss the impacts of the shortfall should we lack the wherewithal. Will the medium term strategic plan make this grade and help us climb this mountain? What does every citizen need to do and prepare for, so we can work together to improve our situation and buttress ourselves against the hardships to come. If our government will not do it, should CERO add this to the list of disasters for which we need a hurricane plan, and citizens be given 48 hours warning, not meaning to be facetious.

Barbados and the Caribbean are not only faced with a dilemma not of their own making but are currently plagued by unprepared elected leaders who prioritize responses to political pressures and political agendas over the task of the management of the economy through this crisis. Resources urgently needed to boost tourism, manufacturing and to protect jobs, not only are they cut but critical social services such as health and education.  There are other priorities. Meanwhile ministers fill the airwaves with dialogue directing the public’s attention to constituency councils, camps, constituency reports, housing and national youth fora,  as though these are the real things that matter at this time.

Austerity measures in the European market will slow down tourism recovery, and the unsteady recovery of the American economy and jobs will further reduce our earnings from tourism and financial services. This can create the dreaded extension of this recession, beyond 2012. Meanwhile the children sing and dance on my screen, heedless that the next three years school leavers (9000) will hardly find the jobs or business opportunities for which we educated them, a social crisis in the making. Dance children, dance…

All may not be lost, the new Prime Minister of Barbados Mr. Freundel Stuart (Acting), and thus leader of CSME may yet return with a report on a plan put to the heads of government to rescue the region.  Dance children, dance.

63 responses to “While Nero Played The Fiddle, Rome Burns: Whither The Region, Our Future…”

  1. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    It is time for Owen Arthur to go home and get a rest, from the looks of him he needs it. Is he still tending his backyard garden? Or was that only for election time?

  2. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    Some needs to tell Owen Arthur that he is not President of the West Indies. He is wash-up, former Prime Minister of Barbados whose own party don’t even seem to want him anymore.


  3. You very touchous Carson C. Owen Arthur ain’t washed up yet. The last time I say him, he was looking good and good looking too, looking for better than David Thompson in fact, and better than Mia too.

    J, neither B nor D.


  4. It should be noteworthy to our politicians that there is great uncertainty about the robustness of the growth in the USA with the latest employment numbers in. Across to Europe the collapse of the Greek economy and the contagion which has ensued should interest Barbados given its importance as a tourist market. The austerity measures which the new UK government is getting ready to rollout does not help matters. We have been in a hold pattern for 18 months but at some point the plane will have to land to refuel.

    An ailing Thompson and rumours of Chris Sinckler to take over if push comes to shove it would be a fool who rules out the return of Arthur in a climate where people will want to see experience at the helm. The author suggest that we need our leaders to make a paradigm shift in approach, can they do it? More importantly will the yardfowls let them?


  5. Mr Nero,
    Bush Tea has been preaching about our dire future even back when Owen was wasting money by the billions.
    When Owen sat at a public /private sector conference and painted a dread picture of Barbados’ deficit on current account – and then went on to do absolutely nothing about it….Bush Tea was preaching about the chaos to come.

    Our politicians are a collective bunch of jokers. Not because they are any less able than the rest of us, but more because they feel moved to give the impression that they know what they are talking about – when they obviously DON’T.

    Owen is a bovine excrement perpetrator (bull shitter) period!!! No doubt he knows all the answers now that he is powerless to do anything….no doubt he will baffle a few ‘brains’.

    The Youth Forum appears to be an exercise in folly. Bush Tea is yet to understand any purpose for it other than a talk shop – and to allow the new minister to be able to say that he ‘did something for youth’.

    What is the objective? the grand plan? the target group? This Forum sounds like something coming out of a fifth form debating club….. from naive children who actually believe that they understand the problems of the world in 2010.

    Surely, the people who need to drive a national plan for our youth must be guided by wise, old, experienced heads who have proven experience in youth development…. you know – people like Principals/teachers, successful youth organization leaders, police officials etc….

    Finally, if Joe Public have not yet seen what our immediate future will be like – and continues to expect a return to the good old days of largess, well so be it…..we will find out soon.

    @ David
    On Brass tacks today, Tony Johnson essentially said that he and other ‘economists’ have no idea what is going on…… basically they are all waiting to see…. and hoping for the upturn in the economy that their ‘economic science’ tells them is inevitable…. …..apparently he is blaming the consumers for for mashing up the process by not behaving as we are supposed to -according to established economic dogma….LOL


  6. Today one of the youngsters from the youth forum listed its main objective as promoting regional integration among the youth. A nobel ideal don’t you think?

    Thanks BT for summarising what Johnson had to say…lol.

    The Canadian an German economies are stronger than most because their government ran surpluses and stayed away from debt.


  7. Interesting, that we have a situation on our hands that is dire, and threatens to cause everyone one of us to lose our homes, our jobs, and wreck our children’s future and that is the response this evokes from some of you.

    Bush Tea just for your information the medium term plan by DLP shows that the fiscal account deficit was addressed:
    =======
    III. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF FISCAL PERFORMANCE
    1.1 Historical Performance
    ‘Since the 1990-1992 recessions, the aim of government has been to
    ensure that the overall fiscal deficit did not exceed 2.5 per cent of GDP. This
    target was achieved in the ensuing ten years, except in 1996, 2001 and 2002.
    Also, prior to 2002, government’s financing requirements had hardly been far
    out of line with the fiscal deficit of central government, so that the central
    government’s fiscal deficit generally mirrored the overall public sector deficit.
    The fiscal deficit of the central government reached a high of 6.4 per cent of
    GDP in 2002, partly the result of government’s counter-cyclical measures to
    stimulate real economic activity., Recognising the need for greater fiscal
    prudence, a deficit of 3.0 per cent of GDP was realised in 2003 followed by 2.2
    per cent in 2004, 4.2 per cent in 2005 and 1.5 per cent in 2006. However, the
    average annual deficit as a percentage of GDP did not get back to the 2.5 per
    cent target over the 2003 to 2006 period.’======

    2002 high of 6.4 was to counter the dramatic drop in the economy because tourism fell out of the sky in Sept 2001 during a period where a recession had already started in 2000. That policy prevented Barbadians from feeling a bump, few Barbadians know that there was a recession in those years. bahamas, Cayman, St. Lucia, Antigua and Jamiaca suffered severe losses in thier oturism industry. We did not. That is why you still have your house and job.

    How do you plan to protect and provide for your family in this deepening crisis? Check BBC news report about the world economic report by HSBC. Are you all hunky dory with the response of leaders? I sure as hell am not.

  8. Straight talk Avatar

    IMHO:

    Barbados’ current economic status is unsustainable.

    For the last twenty years we must admit we don’t earn enough internallly to keep our economy afloat.

    We are beggars thrusting our hands to holidaymakers and potential immigrants

    Anyone not realising this fact is fooling themselves.

    Selling coastal land is finite, but it would be an abuse of civill liberty to condemn Bajans maximising the inherent value of their land.

    I strongly believe, with much evidence that foreign villa rentals pay little if no contribution to the GoB.

    We are losing millions in untaxed revenue.

    Book in the USA or UK or Canada, pay the owner in their own currency, and what is the benefit to Barbados? Zilch.

    The VAT on food, frolics and airport tax?

    Chickenshit to the millions of dollars in lost revenue, due to our own slaphappy diligence.l

    Every rental property should by law be registered, I say 90% aren’t.

    Scan the internet if you doubt me.

    Why are foreigners allowed to to be tax free , whilst we are paying for the benefits which atttract tnem?

    Something is amiss.


  9. Interesting to hear developments coming out of Jamaica at the CARICOM Summit. T&T is not sending much love from Kamla to her regional partners. Kamla says hold on to a partnership with the EC. Kamla says T&T can’t be seen as the one with deep pockets to bail others in the region. Interestingly T&T with an oil-based economy always seem to have excess capital hence the opportunity to snap up enterprises across the Caribbean. Why should T&T not see the need to invest and support the other economies in the region? Doesn’t T&T have a vested interest in a strong regional market?


  10. Something is definitely not right, reason being there are all sorts of tax and what this suggests to me that many business are not operating as profitably as they perhaps could and with much of their business limited to the Barbados economy, where there are drastic opportunities to generate wealth outside of the region if certain trades weren’t treated with inferiority. The administration of taxes a necessity… yes but perhaps the level of taxes could deter many businesses from operating in Barbados altogether seeking other tas havens in the Caribbean… It may be ludacris but if something is broken it should be fix especially if the future of the next generation relies on our decisions.


  11. P.S My sincere apologies for the typos… I was in a great hurry.


  12. The recent presentation by Mr. Owen Arthur to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of the Caribbean (ICAC)28th Annual Conference, and titled: The global Economic Crisis: The Role of International Financial Institutions in the Caribbean, seems to us – the People’s Democratic Congress (PDC) – to have been presented to this group of Chartered Accountants, and by extension to a maze of regional publics with a political economic outlook that still casts the Caribbean in a 20 th Century immediate post-independence political material financial environment.

    A critical examination of Mr. Arthur’s address does show that this is indeed so.

    His clearly conjuring up imagaries of a group of G 20 leaders in London in 2009 (in some senses restringing and reproducing some false echoes of a long gone Bretton Woods era) in the midst of an international crisis among many countries, meeting to put together a programme to RESCUE the global economy – the leaders of the MOST POWERFUL countries of the world warming the hearts of men and women everywhere, a la a statement which said, inter alia:
    “We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth to be sustained has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries, but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today’s populations, but of future generations too.” – DOES DO SO.

    However, in his doing so, he failed to seperate certain myths from certain facts.

    Mr. Arthur has appeared now more than ever before to be a brazen bold chronicler of myths by peddling other persons’s own false beliefs that prosperity is indivisable; that for growth to be sustained it has to be shared and other hoopla.

    Thus, a serious analysis of the causes of this present relapsing international economic situation would show that the long, persistent greed of an elite few helped started this current situation, and that the long ongoing vulnerability of many local and international financial systems to tend almost always towards system crisis implosion owing to their own fundamentaly flawed designs weaknesses, would belie the above quotation and its meaning.

    But, what is worse, intellectually speaking, is that – in his address – Mr. Arthur spectacularly failed to comment on the fact that – even as he spoke – there have been views among many people in the Caribbean and beyond, that the US political economic recovery is very fragile, that the Eurozone debt crisis and the consequent spending cuts and taxation increases in many EU countries have been making the EU’s political economic recovery seem more and more distant (Finland has been reported to have gone back into recession), and that even in China – which was touted by some persons to be leading the world out of this so-called global recession – where the government of China has been recently thinking about reining in so-called inflation, and where manufacturing/industrial production – in many ways – has been declining some what – there have been some recent reports coming out of some international media of China taking steps to slow the economy there down – all of which and some more else – help contribute to making prospects for global political economic recovery more uncertain and even dimmer.

    So, how could Mr. Arthur have been making an address of the sort without properly considering that there is really no global economic crisis, but that what there has been is essentially a series of profound crises in many Western financial/debt management systems, and in their supporting ideological philosophical and psychological imperial structures, and which as a consequence have been terribly affecting the functioning of the economies of many pro-Western countries across the globe?

    And how could Arthur not recognize that these crises in these many Western financial/debt management systems, and their supporting ideological philosophical psychological imperial structures, and which as a consequence have been terribly affecting the functioning of the economies of many pro-Western countries across the globe, are now being more and more prolonged owing to clearly painful relapses?

    Why would the US Fed have said in the closing stages of a recent two day meeting that: “financial conditions have become less supportive of economic growth….largely reflecting developments abroad?” – (pg 22 Monday, June 28, 2010 edition of the Barbados Business Authority)

    Also, the fact that Mr. Arthur in his address focussed on “the response of the international financial institutions (IMF, IADB, World Bank, CDB, and their relevant mentioned funding facilities) to the plight that our region has faced as a result of the global economic crisis”, rather than his having focussed on the causes of what is essentially, again, a series of profound crises in many Western financial/debt management systems, and in their supporting ideological philosophical and psychological imperial structures, and which as a consequence have been terribly affecting the functioning of the economies of many pro-Western countries across the globe, has meant that Arthur’s misplaced useless address has provided evidence of the profound crisis in the so-called intellectual and political leadership of this country (Barbados now), and has clearly shown too that so-called regional leaders like Arthur are so dependent on the West and Western instititional frameworks for their supper – a type of chronic demeaning behaviour that of course do place the countries from which they have emerged in a very unfavourable light.

    That Arthur could also have said that there were three other sets of economic forces ( loss of trade preferences, food and fuel crises, and high government debts – that have complicated the Caribbean region’s ability to cope with the effects of its share of this so-called global economic financial crisis – is to again – for him – to cast the Caribbean in a 20 th Century immediate post-independence political material financial environment – in a dependency mode still depending on bigger European powers for guidance and protection – or in a helpless mode such that when some adverse things are happening to the region, many parts of it (except Cuba) are to be seen crying out to these bigger European powers for lenience, relief like little children crying to mummy – just check Colin Jordan – the Barbados Tourism and Hotel Association’s President – and his very backward outrageous position on the United Kingdom’s APD ( Back page, Barbados Business Authority, 5 July, 2010 ) and see what we mean by that particular point – rather than they identifying and putting in place workable partial solutions to these particular regional political economic financial problems.

    And worse still is that Arthur seeks sheepishly hypocritically to blame those three claimed forces for making things worse ( economically financially ) in the region – when it is clear that in the case of the Government of Barbados – where 1, is concerned, both DLP and BLP Governments have had enough time to help restructure and reposition the industries concerned since the last round of the GATT (Uraguay Round) – to know what was coming – where 2, is concerned, DLP and BLP Governments have stupidly been allowing our food security to become threatened by allowing many of our agricultural lands to be converted into non-agricultural uses, and in many cases to be sold to foreigners; where fuel issues are concerned – both have failed to lead the way in relation to making sure that there is less dependence on fossil fuels for electricity generation, and thus more progress towards greater use of alternative energy sources for most of our electricity needs, and in regard of 3, both these joke DLP and BLP Governments have been recklessly flagrantly increasing the government debt, and have been at the same time the biggest beneficiaries of a ballooning government debt

    No doubt similar things have been happening in many other Caribbean countries!!

    So, politically comatose is Mr. Arthur when he thinks that “to carry out the programmes to bring about fiscal and debt sustainability, would mean pursuing policies to reduce expenditure, which could in turn deflate the economy, and that on the other hand, to offset the worst effects of global recession, stimulation of the economy by fiscal and other tools was necessary”, that we have only to look at our own ( PDC’s) policy outlooks/program for notions of the removal of TAXATION, Interest Rates, Institutuional Repayable Productive Loans from our political financial lanscape, to help instil in Barbados and the rest of the region how to overcome such unbearable thinking by him and others.

    And therefore what nonsense from him about there being “no easy answer that can or has been found to such a dilemma”??

    Finally, it is clear former prime minister Arthur went about his address without much a clear and good understanding of these following five fundamental facts too – which in different ways do undermine the central thrusts of his theme :

    1) that there has been really no global economic crisis ( China, India, Singapore, Australia, Uraguay, etc. did not go through recession in 2008/2009 and are NOT going through recession any time in 2010);

    2) that the so-called economic financial crises that have been occuring in the so-called Caribbean economy have been greatly caused by domestic factors – largely through archaic but destructive governmental fiscal financial policies and their impact on the cost of living and doing business in these countries, and largely through destructive policies of the core financial sectors of these countries and their impact on the productive sectors of the countries concerned – moreso meaning these national domestic factors in each country have meant a greater than expected role to play for those institutions rather than through external global factors;

    3) that the Caribbean is of no strategic importance any more Cold War over, so-called economically/financially, to the G8 countries – just check the demolition job helped done on some of the region’s sugar industries – banana industries – attempts to dismantle some offshore financial sectors of the region – in favour of some others’ interests – so for these multilateral financial institutions there has DURING the COLD WAR and SINCE the ending of it been hardly a real role for these institutions ( not CDB) to play in the political economic recovery of a region that only commands a very small fraction of world production, income, trade, etc.;

    4) that part of the process of making some countries help pay for some of the costs of US-led military coalition’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – and banking elite financial skulduggeries have been leading to political economic crisis in many of countries of this world and have led to some grave debt crises in some Anglo-American European regions – trade preferences losses, food and fuel crises, and high government debts in the region in themselves are miniscule when contrasted with the ever burgeoning financial costs of such wars and their causes and the financial costs of the global banking elite’s dangerous financial actions and why they are caused ;

    5) and that multilateral financial institutions of the type mentioned are becoming more and more irrelevant to the needs of people of the region – esp. with the rise of the Chinese political economic behemoth and financial powerhouse.

    PDC

  13. Alex Fergusson Avatar
    Alex Fergusson

    The Parliament of Barbados is meeting and Jones is talking – as he has been for one hour now.

    A lot of froth. There is a simple amendment to Section 12A of the Income Tax Act to insert the word: “exclusively.” A simple thing that could have taken five seconds.

    He is not talking about a sugar cane industry or ethanol, nothing about improving markets so that our fish would find its way into Europe. Nothing about an Agriculture Protection Act, or food security.

    Yet Jones talks.

  14. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    PDC

    Well said.

  15. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    PDC

    “Your website has been suspended!

    The web hosting account that hosts this website has expired!

    If you are the owner of this website, please login to your hosting Control Panel and renew your account.

    If you are a visitor to this website, please access this page later.”


  16. CCC
    How is your comment above relevant to the issue being discussed?

    Do you post because you have accesss to a PC and internet access?

  17. Carson C. Cadogan Avatar
    Carson C. Cadogan

    MONICA

    I tried to visit PDC website, but that was the message which I got. I am just alerting them to it.

    Obviuosly they are not aware of it or they would have fixed it.


  18. Someone really should subject the RHOSA’s speeches and statements to careful content analysis. Whenever I hear Arthur I am remimder of the story of poor Johnny-one-note.


  19. @ David. Trinidad has a large resever in its central bank coupled with a huge surplus in their heritage fund …in excess of $8 billion US dollar. The petroleum fund has less than $ 100 million US dollar. Now , Trinidad has been the biggest beneficiary of free trade in the region, it enjoys a trade surplus of over 1.5 billion US$ with its caricom partners. Trinidad trade surplus with Jamaica alone is almost a billion US dollar. The OECS , Hiati and Guyana has benefitted from the petroleum fund recently , through loans. I dont undestand why Mrs Bisseau is sounding so condescending, knowing that the region economic health is linked to Tand T prosperity seeing that they enjoy such a huge trade surplus with the rest of the region.

    Her statement about Trinidad being “godfather for the region” is downright fiesty and
    pretentious.The measly petrolem fund account is not going to break T&tT bank. I am glad BIM didnot access the funds. The GOT &T is behaving like the friend that lent you money when you are down and then goes around telling everbody and cursing you on top of that. With friends like those, who needs enemy. If Caricom should dismantle tomorrow T&T stand to losse the most.


  20. The great concern here after reviewing the speech is that the forces moving against our country will impact all of our people, and the poor will get hit hardest. If we cannot get financing for our trade, businesses that produce for export will lose jobs this year. If our foreign exchange earnings continue to be impacted, it will become difficult for the retail sector to purchase goods to sell us, even if we have our jobs, the goods will not be available. This will then affect the other businesses and government revenues. The question is will gov’t be forced to layoff workers or will they increase taxes to boost its income, thus increasing the pressure on families and the cost of living. I agree with Nero, our leaders are not outlining these issues raised by Arthur, nor addressing it in a meaningful way, to give us confidence that htey cna lead us in this crisis.

    Case in point, in Parliament I am listening to Min. Jones, (‘I does have to laugh’), accusing the BLp of abandoning agriculture and the farmers. Facts are they introduced greenhouse tech.; wind tunnel farming to poultry, fuel canes and specialty sugars, just to name a few. The greatest harm was caused by the Dems who raise their water costs by 60% causing some small farmers to come out of farming, and increasing the cost of vegetables.

    I heard only some of his speech, but this BLP bashing took considerable time, no doubt he thought that this is strategy to improve agriculture. Can anybody tell me if he presented an agricultural strategy to deal with agriculture within the context of the situation outlined by Arthur, where an infused and aggressive strategy is going to be used to grow export crops; have large scale farming initiatives in joint ventures in Guyana which can do import substitution for our tourism product and serve the other regional tourism destinations to earn foreign exchange. It will create jobs to substitue for those lost in construction and tourism. It is this type of creativity I look for in leaders especially in a time like this.
    What do we get from Jones- the member for St. George should drink something called bumpa or bump up. Give me a break.


  21. @zion1971

    Got a feeling we are going to be in for a rough ride as far as T&T is concerned. The former administration refused to go Petrocaribe because of a sense of loyalty to T&T recognizing it was a benefactor of last resort to use the term. Now where do we go from here?


  22. @ Zion
    could not agree with you more. Manning was not indulging in charity but protecting the economic interest and expansion of his manufacutring and retail sectors to balance his oil sector. These are the problems you encounter when people who want political office do not prepare themselves or study the issue of government or economics. Just political posturing, and by the time Kamla Bissessar has to follow through, the region has no reason to let in her goods, but give preference to the Chinese goods instead. The same blasted foolishness as ‘evah so welcome wait for a call’. Know where the countries interests lie. This new crop of leaders have retarded the regional process. I listened with keen interest to Golding challenging his colleagues that we need to do this, coming from Jamaica that is good. since Arthur took his hand from the tiller in pushing CSME forward, nothing has been done in two years. Freundel Stuart now has it to do. Pray God our leaders find the courage to push ahead.

  23. Knight of the Long Knives Avatar
    Knight of the Long Knives

    Owen’s idea of growing the economy for years was selling coastal lands, which must almost all be gone by now and getting jobs for bajans as waiters, barmen, busboys, etc in foreign owned and managed hotels. What is so brilliant about that. If he was so smart he would have prepared for the eventuality that tourism could be reduced significantly by extra regional events, whether terrorism or simple economic recession. I for one don’t think too much of him and I think as time passed he bacme more absorbed in filling his own pockets than anything else.


  24. Owen is a bovine excrement perpetrator (bull shitter) period!!! No doubt he knows all the answers now that he is powerless to do anything….no doubt he will baffle a few ‘brains’.

    —————————————————
    HA HA HA HA HA HA

    LOLOLOLOL LOL LOL LOL


  25. a bovine excrement perpetrator (bull shitter
    ————————
    O MY GOSH !!!

    THIS IS A CLASSIC


  26. Pig the rat is now catching up on his vocabulary

    Bovine excrement is a standard phrase used on BU for over a year now- introduced by none other than GP the GP


  27. @Anon: “Bovine excrement is a standard phrase used on BU for over a year now- introduced by none other than GP the GP

    Actually, that’s incorrect.

    I first introduce the phrase “bovine excrement” in order to say “bullshit” but to get past the automated WordPress filters….


  28. @ David. The petrocaribe arrangement wouldnot benefitted T&T per se seeing that they are a oil producer and exporter even though they import oil also from Venezuela to make up for the shortfall in the local market after export. T&T had excess refinining capacity in the 70s and 80s such that they were importing oil as far away as Iran and then turns around and export this refine oil. However, the collapse of oil prices in the mid-eighties causes them to get rid the excess refining capacity.

    @BajanTruth. We must take Mr Golding prouncement with a grain of salt. The Jamaica Labour Party historically has be a conservative , anti/regional/integrationist party. Their founder Bustanamante was instrumental in jamaica withdrawing from the federation and their former leader Seaga prevent jamaica from joining the Caribbean Court through a privy council ruling three years ago. Until I see some action, I am just going it assume it is talk as usual. They have recently appoint a jamican academic-lawyer to the Caribbean Court so I wait to see Kingston move on joining the court.


  29. @ Knight of Long Knives
    Owen’s idea of growing the economy for years was selling coastal lands, which must almost all be gone by now and getting jobs for bajans as waiters, barmen, busboys, etc in foreign owned and managed hotels.
    ===============
    Interesting concept, what strategy would you have used to grow the economy?What jobs would you generate? You may wish to understand the strategy before you assessed its usefulness?


  30. @Bajan Truth

    There is great illogic in your statement. How can Arthur or you justify implementing a strategy which commonsense would have dictated to be unsustainable?


  31. Alex Fergusson // November 5, 2009 at 10:53 AM

    “Your job is to make the Government look good and hers is to make the Government look bad.”

    ++++++++++++++++++++++

    Nobody had to do anything to make the DLP look bad. That happened naturally when people started thinking for themselves.

    How long did you think it would have taken for the people of Barbados to realise that the DLP does not know what it is doing; (2) that the DLP’s extremely high taxation is being used to finance consumption; (3) that all the DLP has to show for its $1.4 billion increase in the national debt in a mere 18 months – is constituency councils; free camps; free bus rides and numerous trips overseas with a little fete here and there at Illaro Court?

    How long do you think it would have taken before Barbadians realise that the DLP is creating a mendicant society, while schooling Barbados’ next generation in the art of begging and freeness?

    Thompson even set the perfectly bad example by going all over the world begging philantrophists for money to build the same new hospital, he told Parliament – that his Cabinet has not yet agreed to build.

    THE DLP IS IN TROUBLE. IT IS FAR LESS POPULAR THAT THE DLP/WICKHAM POLL SAYS. BARBADIANS ARE NO LONGER WID DEM!!!


  32. Knight of the Long Knives // July 6, 2010 at 7:11 PM

    “Owen’s idea … What is so brilliant about that. If he was so smart he would have prepared for the eventuality that tourism could be reduced significantly by extra regional events, whether terrorism or simple economic recession.”

    Mr. Arthur is clearly therefore not a very clever economic strategist. Now Mr. Arthur also removed Clyde Mascoll from the DLP thereby solving once and for all the DLP’s leadership’s squabble. Now how would you rate him as a political strategist…?


  33. Thanks for the comment, Mr. Carson C Cadogan.

    To yourself, Monica, and some others, the question of the Website being suspended will be resolved in a matter of a month’s time.

    It will be back up.

    In times of political economic depression some things have simply got to give.

    PDC


  34. @ David @Knight of Long Knives

    The corruption of the strategy and promotion of it as selling coastal lands to set up condos for our digestion prevents good analysis of its value. The comment is about letting land fetch its highest value, has to do with attracting investors to establish business opportunities here. The disucssion was between the use of land for agriculture, versus housing, verus tourism/manufacturing and services. all of which must take place on land. The problem of 166 square miles to provide for all three necessary activities presents challenges, as to allocation a sthis gov’t found out. nice to ‘pomposet’ about not selling agricultural land, or bajan land or Scotland district. But first order of business for DLP was approval of a large scale development in the area of the East coast for Tony Maughan
    now Brighton, and Pickering. because the reality is tourism projects will provide jobs and foreign exchange, so per square foot the value is greater than the retur from a square foot of agricultural land. The truth is we cannot order investors to come with what we want, ad the competition for invesmtent dollars is hot so we have to pick the best out of what and see how to organise it to the best advantage. You reach for the ideal but you have to play the hand that you have the best way you can.

    The condo issue is the side problem of tourism that targets high end visitors they eventually want to own property unike the less well wealthy person. The condo issue does bring in less vlaue than the person staying at a hotel. It provides the initial bump of foreign exchange and jobs for construction, but the tail off in value is extreme. The only upside is that these persons then have a stake in the country and actions that will impair their investment they can use their influence in the external countries to scotch if required. They also have time to see other opportunities by constantly visiting the island and bringing friends to invest in our country, because it feels like home. I have met some of them at offshore sector functions.

    The push however behind the condo move is landowners and former hoteliers unable to fill the hotels and drowning in debt, to get back a great deal of money. Just like land can the gov’t really prevent people from pursuing their highest good becuase other nonland holding Barbadians want to see the sea? The condo-hotel concept is better merging the best of the two is the way to go. I am not sure why this was not pursued unless the landowners were shortsighted in taking the first offer. it works well in Cayman and other small northern islands. BLp gov’t should have come up with a strategy to try to lure B’dians to not pursue this course. I know that people in St. Peter said Arthur had told them not to sell their properties he would try to find ways for them to
    participate in projects without sellinng their properties. But is is hard for a man with 10,000 square feet or 4000 square feet of to say no to $2m and a nice house located elsewhere. So this gov’t will have to keep trying.


  35. There was a piece in the newspapers from the central bank governor that nearly made me howl, especially when taken in the context of Nero’s piece, about the inadequacy of our leaders to soberly manage this crisis. The said same Dr. Worrell who, sighed and talked about the strain of finding 30m annually to service a $200m loan, while failing to provide comprehensive analytical remarks on the state of the economy but editorialized a few remarks, including majoring on this payment. It was designed to make it look as if the other challenges he is managing, but this one was the real irritant which troubled the economy. This week in the newspaper he defends the tactic of borrowing $400m from the IMF to pay the World Bank, and keep some for the foreign reserves. I wonder how he will manage the increase to a $60m annual payment when it becomes due.

    It seems we are challenged to find persons of integrity in the management of our affairs, but we are plagued with those who seem prepared to compromise their professionalism to dip their tongue in politics and swaggle their behinds in partisanship. When it suits them give one impression and on another a different impression.


  36. @Bajan Truth

    Your position which reconciles with the approach of the previous government and to some degree the current is a strategy without innovation or imagination. When it was times of plenty i.e. economic boom we should have been relaunching our economy built on industries of renewable energy, revisiting cotton, establishing byproducts for sugar and breaking the LIME full nelson on communications to reduce cost to retail and commercial enterprises.

    So much we could have done with the will, note we wrote could* because it is probably too late now.


  37. @ David
    Innovation and imagination are two goods things. I believe you would remember that indeed this was done – competition was brought in for Lime and efforts to increase bandwidth and lower costs. Agriculture ministry had put several hundred acres of land into cotton and formed Exclusive Cottons company, but it needs marketing to get orders. Fuel canes were introduced, greenhouse was introduced; research done on sugar byproducts – ethanol, cosmetics etc next stage was to commercialise, but I think the gov’t changed by then. These things take years to develop. Investments in offshore took 20- 25 yrs,B’dos only enjoyed benefits I think in the last 10 years; investments in culture, imagine my surprise to see it as a line time in central bank reports as an earning sector, many years after the policy was announced. It wukking.

    Renewable energy as you know was investigated by gov’t and I heard Parlia. presentations on it. Also Light and Power was involved because I remember Steven Worme explaining that these energies were developmental and very expensive and we would need to wait until the tech. improvments were completed and costs drop for B’dos to tap the market. The costs of research is prohibitive for small countries that have to keep services running for our population. But the market for renewable energy is improving tremendously now and costs are beginning to drop, so now will be the time. A buddy of mine is thinking of bringing in electric solar panels, so perhaps eventually we could have manufacturing in this area. I am not sure what this gov’t is planning to do to support it.

    As for doing it in the times of plenty, the first 5-7 years was rebuiding an economy that had been splattered on the ground, so the plenty was only the last 8 years with a recession in 2000 – 2002 in between. In the meantime a gov’t has to still provide jobs now, pay for services now , earn foreign exchange now while you are investing in innovative areas, otherwise how would we have eaten and kept homes over our heads. There is no guarantee that these will succeed just because it is gov’t, it is a business venture that can succeed or fail, and have long gesation periods. Look at Gems. Its a balancing act , keep existing working while innovations develop. You try but if it fails you hear corruption, squandermania.

    I have to hand it to BLp when it came to innovation and effort to diversify and lead the charge in the region, they did well. Look at the propsed new initiaitves in health tourism and hence the plan for a new state of the art hospitla and initiaitves to get skills to service this. but the gov’t changed.

    Our main problem really is a lethargic and risk averse private sector that wait on gov’t to take the risk. It was good to hear Bizzy Williams talk about investing in wind energy. Too long those Williams brothers without imagination or risk, fatted themselves on gov’t procurement, easy business and quick wealth. all the fat cats in b’dos none doing anything truly innovative or risky. The last gov’t needed to shake them off, I know they tried to broaden construction by giving more small contractors work; but it was promptly overturned by DLP. But I think they could have done more to reduce this dominance not withstanding the Barrack construction disaster, millions of dollars wasted there. DLP gov’t still fatten these fat cats – Jada and Preconco.

    Stimulating discussion David. What are your views about what changes should come out of this Caricom meeting? and did you get the implication of Sinklers announcement about Adriel Brathwaite?


  38. @Bajan Truth

    Don’t buy a lot of what you wrote in your comment. To suggest the BLP was innovative through the diversification of tourism points to a lack of imagination and innovation. Yes we needed tourism but to pursue an ‘all eggs in one basket policy’ is haunting us now. While our GDP earning supported internationally accepted debt carry ratios in the BLP era it has been said even by IMF and World Bank officials that these standards/metrics are designed to fit international economies. As small developing countries we have to pursue polices which are aligned to who and what we are and not try to fit into these generic moulds which economist like to box us in.

    Are you saying the long time the Town Planning Unit sat on the application for the Lambert Wind Farm project was justified under the BLP? How do you explain the advances in renewable energy initiatives in Anguilla, St. Kitts, Dominica and many of the small islands? It does not matter that the RE technology is more expensive by way of comparison with existing oil based options. What matters is that given developments in the last 10 years vision and commonsense necessitates we develop our prototypes in RE. In the same way the BLP took chances with HRL (JAWS) it could have done the same with developing RE projects. Hell we could have created an RE fund linked to some minimal tax, DO SOMETHING!

    On the reference to the Williams brothers, again BU rejects it. All and sundry know that Owen Arthur and the Williams were very close, very* close during his tenure.

    On the matter of the Caricom Summit what can be stated other than to suggest another talk shop!


  39. Re this silly myth about the Global Economic Crisis

    Motivated by a presently existing BBC on line news commentary by Andrew Harding, titled Africa leads the way out of recession (
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/andrewharding/2010/07/africa_leads_the_way_out_of_re.html), we have been at this moment doing a little online research on so-called economic growth in Africa and have come upon the following information from the African Statistical Year Book 2010 produced by the African Development Bank.

    That Africa as a whole achieved 2.5 % real GDP growth for 2009, down from the 5.4 % real GDP growth average from 2000 – 2008.

    Africa as a whole achieved a 5.6 % real GDP growth rate in 2008.

    That the central Central Africa sub-region achieved a 1.9% real GDP growth rate for 2009, down from the 5.8% real GDP growth rate average for 2000 – 2008.

    That the East Africa sub-region where the same two categories are concerned registered 6.4 % and 5.8% respectively.

    That the North Africa sub-region registered 4.8% and 3.8% respectively.

    That the Southern Africa sub-region achieved 5.3% and – 1.1% respectively.

    And the West Africa sub-region achieved 6.5 % and 3.0 % respectively.

    In the first part of the summarized analysis on Section 2 – Economic Statistics – in this said document – African Statistical Yearbook 2010 – the following was stated: “As a result of the global economic crisis (?), which started in 2008, the growth of the majority of African countries’economies WEAKENED in 2009.

    The extent of the SLOWDOWN is clearly illustrated by the real GDP growth of the continent, which declined to only 2.5 % in 2009, as against 5.6% a year before and an annual average of 5.4% during the period 2000-2008.

    In this context, Southern Africa was the subregion that was most severely affected, with GDP of the region recording negative growth of 1.1%.

    This was due essentially to the technical recession, which affected South Africa during the first half of the year, reducing the positive average rate of growth of 3.7% achieved in 2008 to a negative 1.8% for the year 2009 as a whole.

    Furthermore the deceleration in growth was uneven across countries and subregions, depending on the various factors such as their vulnerability to the external shocks and economic structure of the countries. The slowdown was less severe in East Africa, with growth rates falling to 5.8%, benefiting from the modest recovery of 2.5 % of the Kenyan economy andsustained growth of 5.5% in Tanzania and 9.9% in Eithopia.”

    See that online document for more important information on so-called economic trends in Africa.

    Now turning to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List/_of_countries_by_GDP_(real)_growth_rate#Five_fastest_growing_in_each_region – we found the following and more – “Africa has seen some of the fastest growing economies in the world, but also some of the slowest, including several in decline.

    Angola, bolstered by oil fields, is the 3rd fastest-growing economy in the world. This contrasts with Zimbabwe, which is experiencing a precipitous decline.

    Oil in Africa has created “wealth spots” where a few countries have exceeded their neighbors in wealth.

    Three of the world’s ten fastest-growing economies were African, with some having been at time the fastest-growing in the world. Equatorial Guinea, for example, reached 75% growth in 2004 because of oil production.

    So we in the PDC saw on this web page that where the particular African country is concerned ( out of those that are said to be the fastest growing economies in Africa) – where its % real GDP Growth is concerned – the Date of information – the World Rank – and where the Continent Rank is concerned the following – as presented in our own way –

    That Angola achieved a real GDP growth rate of 13.2 % – this information based on 2008 estimate – while it was ranked 4th in terms of GDP growth rates recorded in the world at that time, and no 1 in terms of Africa then.

    That Ethiopia achieved a real GDP growth rate of 11.2% – this information based on a 2008 estimate – while it was ranked 6th in terms of GDP growth rates recorded at that time, and 2nd in terms of Africa at the time.

    Rwanda achieved an 11.6% real GDP growth rate – this information was based on a 2008 estimate – whilst it was ranked 7 th in terms of GDP growth rates in the world at the time, and 3rd in terms of Africa at the time.

    That Equatorial Guinea achieved a real GDP growth rate of 10.6 % based on an estimate provided in 2008, and was ranked 9th in real GDP growth rates in the world then and 4 th in Africa then.

    Whereas Niger recorded 9.5 % real GDP growth based on a 2008 estimate, and was ranked 14th in real GDP growth rates in the world then
    and 5 th in Africa then.

    And finally in the on line line document: African Economic Outlook 2010 – A 60-Second Guide – again produced by the African Development Bank – the following information is found: “How is the crisis affecting Africa?

    Initial effects of the crisis will be felt through trade due to a fall in commodity prices (mineral ans non-mineral) and plummeting demand from developing countries.

    In fact, many of the new exporting industries in Sub-Saharan Africa are at risk of collapsing. Workers’ remittances, trade finance and FDI are also expected to dry up, posing grave risks to balance of payment sustainability.

    None the less THE REORIENTATION OF TRADE TOWARDS EMERGING MARKETS, prudent macroeconomic reforms, AND DEBT RELIEF HAVE AFRICA BETTER PLACED TO WEATHER THE CRISIS COMPARED TO 10 YEARS AGO ……….”

    The question is asked on the same page (not in this way though – quite rethorically – though it amounts to this) if any person knows that between 2005 and 2007, more than three-quarters of Africa’s exports went to Asia? ( Obviously there must have been a connection between that situation and Europe’s economic and financial crises at this stage and conversely a connection between that situation and the upward sustained growth trend in Asia’s economies)

    And another question is asked of the reader if they know – quite rethorically – THAT IN MORE THAN HALF OF AFRICAN COUNTRIES, TAX REVENUE REPRESENTS LESS THAN TWENTY PER CENT OF GDP AS COMPARED TO 36 PERCENT IN OECD COUNTRIES ( our capitals for emphasis )

    We wonder why DLP and BLP Governments and by extension CARICOM governments, and CARICOM itself too, have never had the foresight, the intelligence, the strategic vision, and an overall sense of knowing what Africa means to this sub-region and what this sub-region means to Africa, to know that it is very important crucial to establish greater diplomatic political ties and relationships than the little ones we have right now with the African Continent, that it fundamentally serves our national interests to get more trade, investments, travel and tourism going with the resources rich African continent, and esp. with so called Sub-Saharan Africa, and by extension to get far more involved in the life of African society just as the Chinese, the Indians have been doing for some while now, and – as we are reading now – just as the Brazilians are also seeking out greater trading and investing opportunities with Africa presently.

    It is ironic and sad that whilst the Barbados government is now seeking to get more trade and travel going between Barbados and Brazil, the Brazilian government is presently seeking to get more trade and investment and other things going with Africa.

    While it is important that Barbados must do more trade and tavel with Brazil, we in the PDC have sensed a strangeness a wrongedness in the setting of global regional priorities by this visionless intellectually bankrupt DLP Government.

    So, Down with the Damn DLP and the blasted BLP!!

    PDC


  40. HA HA HA HA

    LOLOLOLOLOL
    LOL

    Down with the Damn DLP and the blasted BLP!!
    ——————————–
    oh my gosh !
    This blog is funny

    ha ha ha ha


  41. @ David
    Are you saying the long time the Town Planning Unit sat on the application for the Lambert Wind Farm project was justified under the BLP? How do you explain the advances in renewable energy initiatives in Anguilla, St. Kitts, Dominica and many of the small islands? It does not matter that the RE technology is more expensive by way of comparison with existing oil based options.
    ======================

    I must be commmunicating badly or you are reading too quickly. I do not know when an application went in. What I know about that was that the people of Lamberts were complaining, about establishing it there. Light and Power should be able to enlighten us about the time taken on the application. You may better know the cause of the delay. I am not familiar with the initiatives in the other islands. Did government finance them or were they private sector entities?

    The question might be if there were incentives by the previous gov’t to stimulate investment in renewable energy, I would need to research that. The only programme I heard spoken of was the ethanol project with the fuel canes.Interesting that you think it does not matter what it costs we should go ahead and invest in the RE whether we know if they are commerically viable or not. Certainly based on Light and power presentation the photovoltaics were the least feasible at the time. There was a renewable energy and environmental fund to be established and financed by earnings from the offshore oil, which was spoken of in parliament under Liz Thompson.

    You said: Yes we needed tourism but to pursue an ‘all eggs in one basket policy’ is haunting us now
    ================

    I am not sure how pursuing tourism, agriculture, financial services, medical transcription services, energy – offshore drilling, culture is putting all the eggs in one basket. The more advanced sectors would be our sustainer – offshore and tourism, until the others mature and contribute. I am just curious if you did not do tourism, what was new that was ready to go market?

    You said: On the reference to the Williams brothers, again BU rejects it. All and sundry know that Owen Arthur and the Williams were very close, very* close during his tenure.

    I read your comment about the Williams brothers, reread my statement. I thought, my statement corroborates that. I made some additions to it, to make my meaning clearer: Too long those Williams brothers without imagination or risk, fatted themselves on gov’t procurement, easy business and quick wealth (I should have added during BLP administrations. To my knowledge it is generally known that Bees favoured Williams and Dees favoured Rayside). all the fat cats in b’dos none doing anything truly innovative or risky. The last gov’t ( I should have spelled out – BLP administration) needed to shake them off, I know they tried to broaden construction by giving more small contractors work; but it was promptly overturned by DLP. But I think they( I clarify, the BLP) could have done more to reduce this dominance ( I add now – instead of continuously fattening them) not withstanding the Barrack construction disaster, millions of dollars wasted there.


  42. I did not believe my ears yesterday when I heard in the news that Adriel Brathwaite was made Attorney -General. Congrats to him, he comes over as an okay guy, but I thought it would have been Lashley. I thought the announcer had made an error and left off Acting from the title, because we have an Acting Prime Minister whose substantive post is Attorney- General. The news brought Sinckler making the announcement, it was not an error, Adriel is the substantive Attorney-general. I was shocked because it implied and confirmed that Thompson was not coming back. Congrats to the new PM, acting.

    LLLOOOOlll. Peter Wickham coming to do damage control to state that it is only an appointment for two months, because you cannot have someone acting for eight weeks, that is too long. People act for years. I need someone to clarify for me if you really appoint someone for two months because the attorney general and prime minister cannot be the same person. I am sure Freundel acted as Prime Minister, and was the substantive Attorney General before in Thompson’s absence. I think they made a slip to show that they already count out Mr. Thompson. Really it would have been more appropriate for Adriel to act until, then appoint him if Mr. Thompson does not return.


  43. It seems that the DLP members know more than they are telling the public.

    One wonders who will be the first to run to the GG this time?

    I remember well an article by Lenny St Hill in 1987 when he wrote ” Sandy OUTRAN them to Government House and they were OUT- RUNOUT!”

    When Richie started to seek support from the parliamentarians, the King maker Cammie Tudor told Sandi exactly what to do.

    Seems there will be interesting times ahead. But the better DLP men all of the scene, now.


  44. Have to agree with you Bajan Truth. We need to solve this equation. If Prime Minister Thompson is supposedly offthe island for two months and the Attorney General is acting as Prime Minister. Why would you place Mr. Brathwaithe in the substantial post as Attorney General. Suppose Prime Minister Thompson resume work after the two-months break, please tell me what position will Mr. Stuart hold. Will he remain as Acting Prime Minister to ease the burden from Mr. Thompson? We need to know.


  45. @Bajan Truth

    You are hopping all over the place like Hammie.


  46. @Tell Me Why

    PM Thompson conferred full powers to Stuart which means Stuart had to shed the AG portfolio. When (if) Thompson comes back the situation can be reversed no? What is the big deal?


  47. @ Monica

    Your comment provided food for thought. It struck me forcibly that Freundel is in St. Michael South same constituency as Sandiford. Oh my God.


  48. Are the taxpayers of Barbados paying the salaries of two Prime ministers at this time?

    Are Mr Thompson’s medical bills being paid for by the taxpayers? (As a civil servant, the Government did not pay my medical bills when I had a heart attack some years ago.)

    Why is it necessary for Mr Thompson to seek medical help abroad? There are Barbadians who are “public” patients i.e. rely on the State services who cannot go abroad for medical treatment unless they pay for it themselves.

    I sincerely wish Mr Thompson a complete and early recovery from his illness but I hope that whatever is “good for the goose is also good for the gander”.

    When is the “budget” presentation due?


  49. Interesting development at the Caricom meeting. I only heard par tof the speech by Denzil Douglas so I may not have my facts right. It sounded to me like he said that the leaders have agreed that the hour is urgent and we need a Caricom governance structure like EU…..I am not sure if this is his recommendation or a report by him of their discussions. If it is the latter – thank God, brek out the halleluah chorus. He also went on to speak about completing CSMe and talk
    about free movement of people, so I was unsure if the structure was going to be limited to supporting just this, or a form of political union.

    Did anybody hear all that was said?


  50. Good Moses, can’t some of you read between the lines and refrain from political humbuggery, issued for the sake of it?

    In the PM’s absence, one thing we can thank him for is leaving a good candidate slate, for the Government to continue on, in his absence.

    Then again, some will seek political points, no matter the circumstance, no matter the delicacy and compassion required.

    Thanks for the clear indication of your thoughts and attitudes.

    We, the voters will mark it well.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading