
Today’s headline in the Nation newspaper features the sudden closure of the Drakes Christian School formerly the Elijah At Shiloh Christian School Inc. We must confess that we received the email quoted below from the owners of the school earlier in the week and decided to spend sometime doing some background investigative work. Given our limited resources it has taken more time than we would have preferred but given the release of the story by the Nation newspaper we have decided to counter the sensationalism which Melissa Rock and her counterparts have brought to this story.
In the very long letter which the Drakes submitted to BU they have clearly articulated the issues as they see them. But is there more to this story? Did the Nation reporter Milissa Rock apply the five W’s? Based on our limited investigation we challenge the Nation newspaper that they even applied 3 W’s.
We are concerned that the Nation headline story paints a picture given by a few parents, who are rightly outraged, that their children of special needs will be displaced given the sudden decision to close the school. BU questions the decision by the Drakes to close the school with such a short notice period. We further question the high staff turnover rate which the school has experienced in recent years. Maybe the Nation reporter should have done an interview with some of the teachers who have departed to get a more balanced view. We question why the Nation would break this story and no mention of the letter quoted below is made. We question why several parents have removed their children from the Drakes Christian school after questioning the learning environment which exist at the School. Finally we question why the school would have been closed so soon after sending correspondence to the Prime Ministers Office dated 20 March 2008.
Given the length of the letter we will not add to it but we have a difficulty reconciling many of the issues cited by Drakes in the letter and what is reported in the Nation article. Hopefully the Drakes can come to BU and clarify these issues.
Here is the preamble to the letter received from the principals of Elijah-at-Shiloh Christian School Inc formerly Drake’s Christian School.
Dear friends:
I am going to be sending you by separate cover a letter to the Prime Minister regarding the closure of My School. I built this school from an enrollment of 5 to 72. It is a devastating loss to us and also to the parents of this School. The Powers that be DO NOT WANT effective Special Education for children in Barbados. Those of us in the industry are well aware of that.
The letter to the PM documents the sad story. I am hopeful that you will share it with the Barbadian Public. At this point I have no need to be anonymous. You have full permission to use our names.
Yours truly,
Sydney and Frances Drakes
Founders and Principals
Elijah-at-Shiloh Christian School Inc.
(Formerly Drakes’ Christian School)
Harts Gap, Hastings
Barbados
Read full text of the letter purported to have been submitted by the principals of the Drakes Christian School to the Prime Minister of Barbados
March 20, 2008
The Honourable David Thompson
Prime Minister
Prime Minister’s Office
Government Buildings
Bay Street
Dear Sir:
It is with the deepest regret that we are informing you of the Closure of Elijah-at-Shiloh Christian School Inc. (formerly Drakes’ Christian School) effective March 20, 2008.
We approached you in your former position as Leader of the Opposition in 2000 that you would use your good offices to facilitate the recognition of this Institution by the Ministry of Education, Youth Affairs and Sports as it was then known. You reminded us at that time that Mrs. Frances Drakes, formerly Frances Mosbaugh was your personal teacher when you were enrolled at St. Gabriel’s Primary School.
After December 13, 2001 we wrote you a letter officially thanking you for your interventions.
In the intervening years, even up to this present date, we have experienced great hardship at the hands of Officers of the Ministry of Education and Human Resources as it is now known and very little assistance, in areas of recognition, in areas related to the Eleven Plus, vis-à-vis the particular needs of our former students ( Special Needs) in the areas of Registration and Management at Schools Supervision.
Last year you may have noted that this School and its students and some of the parents in written form, to the previous Prime Minister, The previous Minister of Education, The Chief Education Officer, The Minister of Social Transformation and the Department of Testing and Measurement, MOE, in the Press and on the television made numerous appeals that the stipulated terms, published by the Ministry of Education, Government Secondary Schools of Barbados, 2007 Guide for choice of schools, deferrals and exemptions, be applied without prejudice to applications from this School for deferrals and exemptions. This matter remains unresolved up until the time of this writing. Several students have been left in “limbo” and one who was deemed by a clinical psychologist as being intellectually deficient (mentally retarded) was forced to sit the exam. “Justice deferred is injustice”.
In 2002, subsequent to the receipt of a License to Operate an Educational Institution, issued by the MOE on December 12, 2001, the regularizing of our accounting processes and numerous meetings with our then Financial Controller with Officers of the VAT, we eventually had to personally meet the Chairman of the VAT Tribunal, before this Institution, under its previous name was recognized as a School.
Subsequent to that, we began and were regularly tendering requests for refund of input taxes and receiving such. Further to that our current Financial Controller gave us financial advice that due to the size of our operation it would be best to incorporate and not to continue as a proprietorship as had been registered previously. This was duly approved On March 02, 2005 as indicated by the documents of registration. The VAT continued to honour the fact that we were a School and issue the applied for refunds.
However, on April 16, 2007 we received a notice requesting “information” as to what the status of our company was. They were issued with a copy of the License from the MOE, nothing further was heard from them until an appraisal was issued to this School in early September, 2007. Our financial managers urgently requested and held meetings with the VAT. We were instructed through them to adjust the name of the Company to indicate that it was a School. We have complied at the cost of approximately $8,000 to date in addition to loss of Good Will and Students. Appraisals continue to be issued on a monthly basis.
In pursuit of this matter we have personally spoken with a number of Senior Officers at the VAT up to and including Ms. Dottin, Ms. Goodrige, Mr. Banjie this month. Further letters were Hand Delivered to a number of Officers at the VAT substantiating our above-mentioned position. Further to that after making phone calls to same they informed us that the letter has not yet reached their desk.
One of the assertions that we were informed of was that the License of December 2001 did not categorically state Elijah-at-Shiloh Christian School Inc. as intimated above, we have experienced extreme RESISTANCE in receiving requested communications from the MOE who had been informed of the name change since September 19, 2007. This certification was also requested by the VAT as one of their requirements.
On a number of occasions persons seeking information pertaining to this School or facilities similar to those offered to this School, from Officers of the MOE have informed us that they were given information of a very negative nature about this School and its practices, its teaching staff , and adverse comments of “A RACIAL NATURE” regarding its Administration, by said Officers.
This was clearly slanderous and defamatory of our character. This adversely affected the growth of our business and its financial viability. Yet, the MOE has only ever brought TWO cases to our attention of which they were concerned. In both cases we were able, by our records, to clearly prove that these accusations were unsubstantiated. Further we had implemented a practice of notifying the Ministry in advance, in writing, of all cases in which we had to apply the extreme measure of expelling a student to assist them in their determinations. However, we have subsequently been instructed not to include the details on which we based our judgement in writing to the same Ministry.
The last repeated exercise of re-application for registration was commenced in September 2007, having only been notified of its requirement via a parent who was told by Officers of the MOE that the School was not registered. This is six years subsequent to the issue of the License dated December 12, 2001 and many completed exercises of re-registration.Officers of the MOE have been cognizant and personally recognized that our student body are 99.999% Learning Disabled. Yet, Officers in charge of the Testing and Measurement Division have continued to demand that our students, though totally incapable, conform and complete all testing implemented to measure the progress of normally gifted students. We have never had a student at enrollment nor at any stage along the way who has been creditably able to complete these age-related tests.
There is a Special Needs Division in the MOE. Officers of that Division have visited the School on numerous occasions, and have been appraised visually, experientially by questioning students and by our records of the capability of our students vis-à-vis their age, yet, no concession has ever been granted to the students of this School. In fact, they have insisted that we extend and expand our syllabus to include subjects that the students are unable to perform in writing but have to receive instruction verbally for and even with that level of assistance do not achieve any significant level of academic proficiency in those subjects.
This practice of demanding more than the essential and foundational subjects dilutes in a significant way the amount of resources in terms of time available to remediate the students for which the parents have paid. We have done our best to comply to both requirements, MOE and the parents, at great expense to the viability of this School. Might it appear that there was a concerted effort to reduce our effectiveness in bringing students to a capable level of literacy at which point they would have been able to acquire all of the knowledge that they were unable to acquire due to their illiterate condition?
As a declared Christian Organization, of which we duly inform our clients that it would not be a requirement for entry, but instruction in the Word of God would certainly form part of our curriculum, we have sought to stand by those principles i.e. complying with the Laws of this Country. In doing so, we have found our reputation and our financial viability to be sullied and victimized.
However, it has come to our attention, from the mouths of parents, clients, and other adults, that there are any number of UNLICENSED organizations/institutions available to them in Barbados. In other words, education and particularly education of citizens in need of Special Education is being victimized by those who are employed to regulate education in this country, while there are those who are extra-the-law (outlaws) who are financially advantaged. This is not only true in the MOE, it was also true at the Child Care Board vis-à-vis nurseries and Day Care facilities prior to 2000. If this injustice continues, it promises to promote a black market economy and license extra-legal commercial operations, which will not further the Governance of this Country, but rather promote the further dis-enfranchisement of its people.
Our miniscule but TOTALLY client-supported organization, which never received any subsidies or subventions from MOE, has historically and will continue to do so until its doors are finally closed, met all requirements of the Labour Board, NIS, Ministry of Health, The Fire Department, its own employees and all the other Ministries above-mentioned. Yet, we have often been dealt with as though we were “White Massa”. Both of us, the proprietors and operators are born nationals of this Country. We happen to have invested our finances, skills and time to provide services to Nationals first and some few foreigners, employing nationals of this country. How can this be justified or accepted? Should not one’s record stand for something?
Between 1996 and 2004 our audited records prove that bad debt, non-payment of fees, amounted to: $80,000. if this trend were extrapolated through to 2008 that amount would be $140,000. Accumulated you would certainly agree, this is a sum for the High Court. However, the individual portions are much less and the cost of pursuit by the current system in place, way exceeds the value. You, in your private office as an Attorney, clearly pointed this out to us. In our opinion, there needs to be with all haste, the establishment of some form of judicial system to effectively deal with these injustices. Small Claims Court. People sincerely provide above level services and are left in the lurch to support themselves and meet their obligations.
Mr. Prime Minister, we know there are many more critical and larger matters that will come to your attention or are currently demanding your attention but these “pebbles” make up the building that you and we seek to live in.
We wish you God’s Grace and Favour.
Yours respectfully,






The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.