Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The breaking news that COB CEO Steve Belle has been suspended by the newly minted Board is not a trivial matter; it is a significant event for members and non‑members alike. A suspension at that level signals an investigation with enough gravitas that the Board felt compelled to suspend a long tenured executive. In the cooperative movement, where trust is key, such a move is of serious concern.

For decades, the credit union movement has been one of Barbados’ few genuine economic success stories – it represents a financial model that has enfranchised many Black Barbadians shut out of traditional banking.There is the potential for the proud legacy of the cooperative movement to be smeared.

And while the audited financials show no material weaknesses or adverse findings, the public does not read audit notes; the public only sees instability. This is where the Financial Services Commission (FSC) should be flexing. The FSC’s mandate is not only regulation but to nurture confidence building. Silence from the regulator in this moment leaves a vacuum that rumour, innuendo, and political mischief will happily fill, especially in the era of social media.

The blogmaster’s suspicion is this a clash between senior management and a new Board eager to assert control. But those “in the know” at City of Bridgetown credit union must understand that even loyal members grow skittish when it comes to who should guard personal savings . A credit union is not an office where decisions are made in a controlled bubble; it is a financial institution where perception alone can trigger a run on deposits.

The matter needs swift, transparent resolution. Any inflated egos in the COB boardroom should be deflated by dispassionate members. A word to the wise should be sufficient.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

56 responses to “COB CEO fallout could destabilize the credit union sector”


  1. The challenges for the cooperative movement in Barbados is not in the model but the nuance we see with the same faces being rotated on the Boards and different Committees and all that flows from it. The petty divisions and politics etc.


  2. Do you have any information that the ‘same faces’ do not also ‘rotate’ in the movement in other jurisdictions? ‘
    …or that the ‘petty politics’ is any different in other places where co-ops are very successful?

    These are HUMAN failings boss.
    And some of the ‘faces’ that rotate, are those of selfless volunteers – who step up – year after year, when people like you and Pacha just stand outside the tent pissing in…
    The challenge for the local co-op movement is identical to our overall challenge…
    Too many brass bowls…
    Too many chains binding the BB minds…
    We are too attached to the comforts of being chattel slaves.

    Even so, every thing else is worse!


  3. @Bush Tea

    Obviously in a small country, smaller population relative to larger country there will be a higher chance of the same faces rotating. Which supports the original point that in Barbados because of our small relative size, it is a weakness.


  4. The trend in Banking (including Building Societies and Coops) is ackquisitions and mergers where the big fish eat the little fish, staff are made redundant, offices and branches are closed, technology and automation is introduced, operations are centralised, work is outsourced, foreign investors take over..


  5. Actually @ David, co-ops tend to be community-based societies, and even in large jurisdictions, many co-ops are relative small organizations that are built around a common interest, relationship or objective.
    So typically, the average co-op in a small country is very much like the average coop in a large country. Often these are family, workplace, church, or community based.

    Of course there are exceptions where the common interest area is extensive (insurance, financial, energy etc) where the potential for growth in large countries is much greater.

    What is different in Brassbados is our 500-year-old tradition of the plantocracy – where the majority of the population were DISPOSSESSED. The novel concept of OWNERSHIP and collective CONTROL – which is the central philosophy of co-ops is quite foreign in the birthplace of the “Barbados Slave Code”.
    Our politicians are unfortunately key victims of this mental slavery syndrome… which is why they LOVE FDI.

    We have been ‘eddykated’ and conditioned to think that ‘success’ means holding a ‘good’ job, while working for a ‘kind’ boss, RATHER than taking FULL RESPONSIBILITY for our own destiny.
    Bajans therefore prefer a ’good’(servant) job on a modern plantation (bank / insurance / massy / BLPC / etc) owned by a foreigner, to owning their own plantation jointly, and taking collective responsibility for the results.
    Unfortunately our politicians have neither the intellectual skills nor the social capacity to change this mindset – since they too are victims of the mental chains.
    Where else can the blind lead the blind – but over a cliff…?

    What a place


  6. Your point is understood @Bush Tea but it doesn’t negate the argument of scale when comparing small Barbados to large countries.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading