Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Most times when reference is made to Singapore, it is about the system of government and how it has been able to transform itself into a model economy. Here is one of many examples why Barbados will never be able to compare to Singapore. We do not have the will, the mindset, or the discipline required to close the widening gap.

In Barbados, the Ministry of Agriculture is routinely treated as a low status portfolio, like Sports – assigned to junior members of Parliament (MP) or to individuals who prefer not to be overly burdened. The current minister, Shantal Munro‑Knight, is a first‑time MP. This is not a critique of her; it is a critique of the prevailing political culture that treats agriculture – a sector central to food security, land use, climate resilience, and national development – as a tick the box item. Singapore would never assign such a critical ministry to a newcomer. In fact, Singapore does not have a dedicated Ministry of Agriculture. Instead, agricultural policies, food security, and environmental sustainability functions are assigned to the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment(MSE) and overseen operationally by its statutory board, the Singapore Food Agency (SFA).

This is the difference: Singapore efficiently drives to achieve national goals; Barbados distributes portfolios to satisfy political expediency.

Permaculture instructor Andrew Millison journeys to Singapore where he explores the movement to turn that city into an edible garden paradise.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One response to “Why Singapore’s Economy Outshines Barbados”


  1. Weee persist with the enormous efforts to pretend the Titantic is not sinking.

    As ideas like Singapore, as first raised in these parts by Barrow 70 years ago and given all we’ve learnt about development since, could still have meaning for small developing states.

    While we entertain such dreams we have capitalism, neoliberalism, empire and 600 hundred years of Western domination coming to an end. These two ideas cannot coexist.

    How can it be possible to think in terms of development absent the limitations imposed by the failures of the past and the current circumstances?

    Only today the tariff war between Canadá and the USA, the negotiations around them, failed with Carney responding to those measures earlier imposed by Drumpf.

    And this is merely a single data point. But everywhere we look there are massive governance issues, issues of economy.

    We could talk about Japan which recently was forced to hold on to US treasuries and take a 22B loan just to pay for oil. Bessent, wants to avoid a massive sell off which conditions portend.

    Surely, no small island state without resources, not even Singapore, or any other, immediately after the high point of globalization, at a time when large countries and blocs are failing, can find space to do more than merely tryng to survive.

    Mere survival and development are two completely different things.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading