Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The ‘believe you me’ refrain uttered in many forms repeatedly by Prime Minister Mia Mottley has loss resonance with an adulating public. Her most recent pronouncement came while debating the Criminal Gangs (Prevention and Control) Bill, 2026 in the House of assembly this week. She asserted that “we are not going to surrender one witness. We are not going to surrender one police officer or one prosecutor. We are not going to surrender a square inch of this country to an insidious culture that has no place in our jurisdiction.”

For a lowly blogmaster who has heard it all before, prime minister Mottley’s utterance can be quickly labeled has hogwash or more euphemistically, balderdash. She further deliberated that gang activity is not as prevalent in Barbados as other countries but action is now warranted. A terrific insight from one of our preeminent politicians. In fact, it reminds of that time a former Attorney General Maurice King assured the country in all his wisdom that the idea of gangs operating in Barbados was abhorrent.

Again the blogmaster in the words of the late learned and legendary Jeff Cumberbatch, there is no need to be prolix with the state of affairs regarding criminality in Barbados. The government along with too many managing households have allowed the horse to bolt and lack the nous to fix the problem. Here is the bleak outlook, as a people we are clueless to solve for the crime situation and are being consumed by the momentum of popular events.

A look at the BU homicide tracker in the sidebar confirmed we are up to 26 reported homicides as we approach mid year. Based on historical ‘performance’ Barbados will exceed 50 in 2026, the highest number since the tracker was implemented with data sourced from barbadoscrimeblog.

Similar to what occurs in Jamaica and other crime ridden countries, it is not unknown for local politicians and prominent citizens to be seen unabashly fraternising with known shady characters. Are our ‘leaders’ too daff to appreciate that social fallout would be a consequence? Does anyone care?

Crime has embedded itself in the fabric of our tiny society, reversing it will demand tough, long term corrective measures. A review of enforcement strategies in the last decade demonstrate we do NOT have the appetite to do what is required. The business as usual approaches will not arrest the problem.

Prime Minister Mia Mottley, Minister Michael Lashley, Commissioner Richard Boyce and the other actors leading the crime fight will fail. Men (and women) are judged by what they do, not what they say. Let us work harder to build local reputations to match those that are growing in the international arena.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

76 responses to “‘Believe you me’, we won’t give in to gangs”


  1. Tell de rump to take care of he people that although the basics item are in the stores they can’t afford them without food stamps or they cant afford a meal unless they go to some food bank and don’t forget the one living in tents or in their cars.

    Those in power in the USA ain’t no different from the one in Venezuela and Cuba when it comes to hoarding the weallth for themselves and their cronies and that can be extended to all other countries

    The bully can only unfair those that a lot weaker and don’t have a big headed dicky


  2. Baje

    YOU should be the LAST body to talk.

    A F@CKING LIAR calling people hypothetical and armchair quarterbacks.


  3. @ Donna

    Sorry I did not get back to when you brought up Ibrahim Traore and how I saw him. in my view so far all I have seen shows me he is trying to do the best for his country. He has built schools, made roads where they were none and most impressively brought some strong anti corruption laws for any of his ministers or state employees who cross the line. This man has worked for his people and their betterment and that is undeniable and I don’t see how anyone could say differently. I mean they are free to do so, but I can only say I have seen nothing so far that says he is not genuinely there for the people. In other words he can not be spoken of in the same sentence as Muduro, who was an opportunistic dictator interested only in self wealth for him and his cronies.

    Another great leader who like Traore had the best for his people from day one as his guiding light, was Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore. When you think that in 1960 that country was basically a village, you have to give him credit for his life’s work.

    The problem is now though that both of these countries are being pressured internally and externally to hold elections, which both have promised to do. This will bring a new approach to how things will have to be done, but lets hope it does not stand in the way of their progress. The days of one man saying ” this is what we will do” may well have to be tempered a bit for the sake of diplomacy. I see a dictator by a different set of rules than most. A person like Traore and Yew could be deemed dictators, but what they did was done for their people not themselves and history has proven this. There is a vast difference between these men and the likes of Maduro, Marcos, Baby Doc and other persons who drained the treasury at the expense of their people and country. Of course this is only my opinion.


  4. When he was addressing the illegal immigrants issue plenty here said he don’t like coloured people. So all of Europe and the UK now addressing the same issue of illegal immigration now.

    You lap up white people’s shit like a pussy. Hating immigrants is racist as f*ck.
    That’s why USA and Europe have been getting so much mileage from immigrant hate. They* offer noting to anyone.

    Your opinion is offensive and the lowest common denominator.

    (*) Scum politicians
    (**) the number below the line in a vulgar fraction; a divisor.


  5. Lol you too are entitled to your opinion and to me it’s water off a ducks back, however ferl free to voice it and be grateful you live in a country where you can.

    Illegal is illegal regardless of colour class or crede. You either legal or illegal, its like being pregnant, dem ain’t no half pregnant. The reality is the USA, the UK and Europe ALL bit off way more than they can chew with this issue. These countries can no longer afford the luxury they offered and the legal tax paying public in these countries of ALL COLOURS, are tired being bled to support what is quickly becoming a group of welfare states. Even Switzerland a wealthy country not run by Trump, says they will be acting on the issue as well. When they have a problem you can imagine what the others are facing.


  6. I ain’t no lover of Trump but I have to agree with him on much he has done, NOT ALL but much of. When he was addressing the illegal immigrants issue plenty here said he don’t like coloured people.

    I AGREE WITH THIS FEEDBACK 100 PERCENT


  7. you have then right to be pig ignorant parroting white boys tropes like a dummy
    people who hate illegal immigrants hate legal immigrants the same way
    they hate blacks and browns
    trump is not the 1st or the last racist taking us backwards
    60 years ago all the whites were racist now it’s 2/3rds
    they call that progress we progressives call it too slow

  8. three quarter racist faces Avatar
    three quarter racist faces

    3/4*


  9. @ John A

    Whether or not Venezuela was ACTUALLY paid for the oil was NEVER in DISPUTE.

    I’ll challenge you to INDICATE where in any of my contributions (or those of the other individuals who have so far engaged you in discussion), any statements were made to suggest that Venezuela DID NOT receive US$500M from the sale of oil.

    So, WHY should anyone “present 1 article from an international publication saying they have NOT been paid.”

    The central point was that I questioned your comment relative to ““Reuters has CONFIRMED that the USA has transferred……,” simply because I did not find any article published by Reuters in which such a statement was made.

    However, I found an article published by the same news agency, dated February 3, 2026, [exactly FOUR (4) months ago], in which certain comments were made by a US official “speaking on condition of anonymity.”

    What Donna and I queried was whether or not those comments could be reasonably accepted as an official source of confirmation, at that time.

    OBVIOUSLY, four (4) months AFTER the Reuters’ February 3 article, you or anyone could “send 10 different articles from 10 different international publications (CONFIRMING) that Venezuela has been paid for the oil.”

    Additionally, I cannot ‘speak’ on behalf of the other contributors, but perhaps you (and probably 3° as well) may also want to indicate WHERE in any of my contributions any statements were made to suggest I’m “DEFENDING Venezuela and Cuba.”

    As I mentioned in a previous contribution:

    I remain steadfast in MY OPINION that a leader of any country, whether it is Obama, Biden, Trump or even T’Challa of Wakanda……

    …… DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO INVADE ANOTHER SOVEREIGN NATION to INITIATE a CHANGE of REGIME or GOVERNMENT……

    …… or CONTROL that country’s resources.

    I’m of the OPINION that such matters should be left to that country’s citizens.


  10. I also agree with Trump’s immigration policy as it relates to securing the border and deporting illegal immigrants.

    It seems as though the Mottley administration has adopted an ‘OPEN BORDER’ policy.

    I read an article in the May 31, 2026, edition of the Sunday Sun in which an undocumented Russian is seeking asylum in Barbados.

    I also saw a Facebook video in which a man is pleading for help for an undocumented Nigerian woman who came here looking for work.

    There seems to be an overwhelming number of Jamaicans in Barbados.

    I’ve encountered them in shops, bars, restaurants, stores, supermarkets, minimarts, pharmacies as cashiers, shop assistants and security guards, in the streets around Bridgetown as vendors, owners of stalls in markets, selling ‘beef’ in and around the environs of Nelson Street and Bay Street.
    I’ve even interacted with a young Jamaican girl working in the BRA’s Warrens office.

    Walk anywhere around the island and you’ll see several Jamaicans, identified when they talk.

    The usual ‘go to’ argument is that Bajans migrated to other countries as well.

    And, I’m not against people from other regional territories visiting the island.

    However, the recent influx of Jamaicans and Haitians suggests immigration should be managed.

    Barbados needs a Trump to address this issue.


  11. John A,

    I’m afraid I cannot summon politeness to deal with a big man like you on such matters. You need to be shaken until your teeth rattle. And if you were in front of me, I would barely restrain myself.

    Ibrahim Traoré nationalised Burkina Faso’s assets, did he not? I distinctly remember that your assertion was, in Venezuela’s case, that the investors were unfairly kicked out, relieved of what was rightfully theirs. That has nothing to do with what Maduro was doing with it. You are inconsistent!

    And what was the response of the government of the United States of America to Traoré’s action, even after improvements were achieved at warp speed? The usual smear campaign on his name by the AFRICOM commander! Apparently, Traoré is committing the egregious crime of securing himself using his country’s resources! The nerve! Meanwhile, Donald Trump is yet again benefitting from his almost weekly trips to his various properties by charging the government for the rooms and food for the barrage of Secret Service agents who must travel with him. It would, of course, be much better if Traoré were to not pay for security, thereby making himself a sitting duck for Trump, Macron, or whosoever will to pick off. Unfortunately for them and for now, the many attempts to reach him have all failed.

    But the problem is, according to you, that he is being pressured both internally and externally to hold elections. Pressured by whom? Who are these external interferers! Why did they not interfere when the country was being run by those who continued to not make roads where there were none, who did not build schools, and, I might add, did not even build a factory to process their abundant tomato harvests? Kiss me ass internation bodies that cannot do one shite to stop a whole “televised” genocide? Or is it the actual facilitator of the genocide, the self-same, self-confessed pale pirate currently rigging his country’s midterms by gerrymandering the south to eliminate black representation? Surely you don’t speak to me of the would be dictator, the man who says he can do whatever he wants as president, the Lying King whose favourite leaders are all dictators???? Perhaps it is the French vampires, who extracted all the uranium from Niger to power French generators while the Nigeriens lived in darkness?

    You dare speak to me about external forces????

    And what of the internal forces – just yesterday I saw a survey that asked the question — What is democracy? The definition most given by Africans was ” a government that works for the people” not a Western-styled election bought by the monied class!

    Now tell me, if the man is working that hard for his people, with much success, who is it that is pushing for paper ballots? What do you think the world’s poorest people are concerned with right now— a piece of paper upon which to place an X to get what they are already getting? Last I heard, they told him to get on with the business of governing!

    You are in need of serious deprogramming! You would swallow any white shite they feed you! Did you not just try to slap me down with a Reuters report simply quoting the words of an anonymous official of the notorious Lying King’s regime, touting it as FACT versus fiction? You said it was CONFIRMED!

    Man, spotting Fact vs Fiction is a unit on the primary school English Language curriculum! It is an essential comprehension skill!

    GOH


  12. The situation with Venezuela for anyone who has been following for a long time is complex AND cannot be simplified by suggesting regime change is the solution.


  13. @ Artax

    I have nothing against immigration but it must be legally done. Many West Indians benefited from Immiigration in the last decade by going to the UK, USA and Canada but they did so legally.

    As for the current “bring you suitcase and come” policy that the PM introduced I have serious concerns with that. People are entering here without even having to produce a certificate of character and based solely on where they came from. I see Commisong was in the paper saying how many thousands have come. My question to him is how many have found work and registered with the NISSS as required? How many are gainfully employed and what are we doing about those that are not?

    It’s really easy to dream up these ideas but we need to look at what has happened in Europe and ensure it does not occur here. Maybe a controlled qouta system or some way of ensuring that if work is not found in six months you need to return home, some sort of checks and balances.

    Anyhow before I am.told that I hate immigrants let me stop there. Lol


  14. Correction– internatiinal bodies


  15. @ Donna

    The pressure is coming from inside his country as well as outside. He apparently promised elections to his people but has recently pushed it back to 2030 now. So that delay has kind of prompted the pressure If you do a search you will get the details. Of course assuming you trust what Google or any of the others tell you.


  16. @John A

    Do some more research, Venezuela is a country split down the middle.


  17. Just read part of your earlier comments. I can’t stand Joe Biden, have long revised my view on Obama, since I have actually had time to pay attention over a decade now. They are all agents of the same American Empire! They are all guilty of the same crimes.

    As for the immigration issue, I have long and up to recently expressed my preference for immigration control. I have no problem with the deportation of illegal immigrants. I want the same for Barbados. I want an immigration policy that meets our needs. I have no problem with Caribbean people coming here to live, but it must be to our benefit, and I would expect them to act in their own interest with respect to us.

    But, unlike you, I love to place everything in its historical context! You cannot go around thr world bombing and destroying, destabilising, controlling, neo-colonising a country, siphoning off it resources, and complain when their citizens flee to your country. Do you not know what was done by the American government in Central and South America, in Africa, in Iran et cetera, et cetera, et cetera????? Do you not know what American hegemony is? Do you not know what it does? Do you not know that this is their foreign policy??????

    Jesus peace, man! These are documented FACTS, not fiction! Unlike you, I base my opinions on facts. Not all opinions are created equal!


  18. Originally released on the Child of God label in 1982, Immigration is back in its one and only true form. A song that has witnessed several alternate versions unable to compete with the artistry of the original. Written and composed in search of higher heights, Immigration is a hymn to freedom, to puffing on planes instead of trains, to traveling to foreign lands and building one’s own plan without being persecuted, to simply living in this world.


  19. @David

    It will take time to see how Venezuela settles down. You have to remember they have lived under dictatorship for decades. Many of the young people there only know dictatorship and have no experience with democracy. If they get to hold fair elections that will be a step in the right direction. I just hope that with oil money coming in it filters down to the benefit of all.


  20. @John A

    We have case studies in Iraq, Libya and a few others to be able to extrapolate.


  21. What is obvious then is that in all these cases something needed to be done, that all have agreed on. Based therefore on the comments here, the problem seems to be the fact that it was done by Trump. So let me ask wunna a question, if it was done by Biden or Obama would it of been acceptable then? If that is the case then there in lies
    the truth.

    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Facts not fiction

    Obama with Biden as vice president tried to open up cuba ( most here would have agreed with the easing). Trump shut it down in first term and now added embargo


  22. Cuba. This country is not made up of the people who live in Cuba alone, they are thousands of Cubans who left the homeland either by force or choice to build a life otherwhere. While they live outside of Cuba that does not mean they do not look at Cuba as there home. Many of these were forced to leave after their businesses were seized by GAESA following the revolution. Cuba has expanded its tourism market over

    Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    🤔. I would be interested to see what on BU Hansard about A’s opinion in expatriates having a greater say / voting in Barbados elections

  23. tables are turning (which way) Avatar
    tables are turning (which way)

    “‘Believe you me’, we won’t give in to gangs”

    “Podcast Episode 2: The complex geopolitics of today”

    “Black people continue to face lower social standing in the global hierarchy”

    The Answer to the Bu Burning Issues on the table is

    >> The “New World” is a “White World”
    ie. a “Trump (white cabal) World”

    tables are turning keep the “Little Fires” burning

  24. dispensation abomination nation Avatar
    dispensation abomination nation

    “>> The “New World” is a “White World”
    ie. a “Trump (white cabal) World””

    Trump is a convicted criminal (17 counts of tax fraud and falsifying business records) but got a delay to his sentence as he was running for President. The stupid stupid American people voted for a criminal to represent them and created a rigged abomination of a nation in this dreadful dispensation.


  25. This government is just ignorantly arrogany reckless and is extremely reactionary. How could a parliament with such learned attorneys, label lawless, restless, hopeless youths as terrorist.These are the same clowns who we entrusted leadership with and get in parliament and talk shite when countries advise their citizens of the risk of domestic terrorism in Barbados and not to visit. These jackasses are just flippantly ignorant and do not even know when they shit themselves.


  26. @ Hopey
    You are being generous to our politicians.

    When a set of jackasses could get up in in parliament and support a ridiculous rant about politicians ‘crossing the floor’, … because a leader cannot handle ANY kind of opposition, and reserves the right to hand-pick the characters that surround her…
    Then…
    … “ignorantly arrogantly reckless” is an understatement.
    … A bunch of fcu**g brass bowl idjuts, perhaps…??

    We should not be surprised that the bunch of many clowns cannot get one shiite to work. They are selected specifically to vote ‘AYE’ on cue or be shifted.

    What a place!

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading