10 responses to “Greenland: Trump’s predatory mood”

1. 

   Pachamama

   February 3, 2026 at 12:02 pm

   
   

   What “international law”?

   There is no such thing!

   What Drumpf is mouthing is indistinct from what White people have always done and what he has doubling down on in Venezuela, Gaza, Iran and everywhere else which his demented mind or his bagmen suggest might enhance Drumpf’s personal wealth.

   However, the White people of Denmark should not attract the support of the world because they have a history of the exploitation, genocide, of the Inuit peoples of Greenland not unlike the Americans, the Canadians, the Europeans too. Even as the other Europeans are lying in wait to use Greenland as a chip to trade with the Americans in exchange for concessions over Ukraine or with NATO.

   In any event American has no money, other resources, to properly exploit the mineral resources under the melting ice sheet for they lie 200 kilos deep. And even if they did the Chinese currently control 90 percent of rare earth, which are everywhere, but require refining processes largely so controlled.

   In addition, America has no industrial capabilities to build-out the large fleet of ice-breakers necessary for navigation during most of the year. It’s the Russians!

   Most importantly, this play by Drumpf is merely geo-strategic. For the North-West Passage is seen in Washington as the way Russia and China, the BRICS more generally, seek to bypass sea corridors currently controlled by the West and do so much more inexpensively. To have freedom of navigation unempeded by the West. This is the real game here.

   Another data point of a dead umpire displayed signs of rigor mortis.

   Loading…
2. 

   dreamstarworld

   February 3, 2026 at 1:52 pm

   
   

   ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTION IN THE CAMP OF MEAT-HEADS WHO ARE CLUELESS ON THE ISSUE OF PRESCIENCE, FOREKNOWLEDGE, FUTURISM & PROPHETIC PERTUBATIONS

   #WhyIsThisEvenAStory

   The “ISSUE” is not even about “GREELAND” or any of the “HORSE MANURE”!!!

   Since the “LAME-STREAM MEDIA” made a lotta’ “HOOPLA” about a “STORM IN A TEACUP” – “IGRUNT” people have jumped on the bandwagon that was hitched to the “DRUNKEN” salon in Trump’s “DEMNTIA” brain!!!

   Now that the “FAKE PIXIE DUST” has settled & the “RASTAMAN GANGA SMOKE” has cleared, attention is being shifted every which way (TOWARDS EPSTEIN FILES TO GOD KNOWS WHAT), when the real “ISSUES” are being “SKIMMED” over or blatantly overlooked!!!

   According to Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, over 427,000 Ukrainian military casualties occurred in 2024 alone & the numbers in 2025 are still being assessed – expecting those numbers to almost “DOUBLE”!!!

   70,668 Palestinians were killed in the Gaza Strip between 7 October 2023 & 17 December 2025, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH), as reported by OCHA in UNRWA Situation Report #202

   Since the ceasefire took effect on October 10, 2025, Al Jazeera analysis states that 526 Palestinians were killed & 1,447 injured by Israeli attacks during the ceasefire period from October 10, 2025, to January 31, 2026!!!

   “JARED KUSHNER” & “BENJAMIN NETANYAHU” has been pushing “TRUMP” to hit “IRAN”, but have “WALKED BACK” from the edge due to Chinese “INTERVENTION” but everything is in place for major escalation & all that is needed is for some “DAMN ASS” to “SCARTCH A MATCH” & the Middle-East becomes a “ONCE & 4-ALL GUY FAWKES DAY”!!!

   I keep saying that “EVERYTHING” is gonna’ “BURN”!!!

   Europeans are “PREPPING” 4 THE CONTINUATION WORLD WAR II* & its aftermath – while the “Middle East” (BUT ESPECIALLY ISRAHELL*) is preparing for #WW3 & THE APOCALYPTIC FALLOUT!!!

   This is “GEO-POLYTRICKS” on steroids & it ain’t about “GREENLAND” – where nothing will ever be the same “AGAIN”!!!

   Loading…
3. 

   Dirt Farmer

   February 3, 2026 at 3:20 pm

   
   

   @ Isidoros

   A new world order isn’t coming, it’s already here − and this is what it looks like:

   On Sept. 3, 2025, China celebrated the 80th anniversary of its victory over Japan by staging a carefully choreographed event in which 26 world leaders were offered a podium view of Beijing’s impressive military might.
   The show of strength was deliberate and reignited a debate in Western media over whether we are on the cusp of a China-centric “new world order” to replace the U.S.-dominated international “rules-based order.”
   But as someone who writes about geopolitics, I believe we are already there. It might be in flux, and the U.S. still has a big role in it, but a new world order has begun – and as it develops, it will look increasingly different than what it’s replacing.
   A brief history of world orders
   Global history can be understood as the rise and fall of different orders, defined as a given era’s dominant power relations and attendant institutions and norms.
   From 1815 to 1880, the United Kingdom was the undisputed world superpower, with an empire and navy that spanned the globe. The period from 1880 to 1945 was one of imperial rivalries as other countries – largely European and the U.S. – sought to copy Britain’s success and replace its dominance. Supplanting that was the bipolar world of two competing superpowers, the Soviet Union and the U.S., marking the period from 1945 to 1991.
   The fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of a brief period, from 1991 to 2008, of a unipolar world centered on U.S. global dominance, military power and economic might. With the retreat of global communism, the U.S. increased its influence, and that of the international rules-based order it helped establish after 1945, through institutions such as the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

   It did not last long in the face of a long war on terrorism, the fiasco of the invasion of Iraq, the long occupation of Afghanistan and finally the 2008 global financial crisis that undermined U.S. strength and weakened domestic support for Washington’s role as the world’s policeman.
   Toward a multipolar world
   In recent years, a new multipolar world has emerged with at least four distinct sources of power.
   The U.S. remains central to this world order. It is blessed with a huge territory, a dynamic economy and the strategic luxury of large oceans on its east and west and much smaller powers to its north and south. The U.S. had a global military presence in the previous bipolar and unipolar order. But the cost of this imperial overstretch has prompted Washington to shift the cost burden toward its former allies, leading to a new militarization in Europe and East Asia where most countries now aim to increase military spending.
   There is also a change in economic arrangements. In the unipolar order, the U.S. promoted a frictionless free trade arrangement and economic globalization. This resulted in the global shift of manufacturing that in turn created a populist backlash in those countries where manufacturing employment was hollowed out.
   Now, economic nationalism is becoming a much more common refrain than free trade. Long the promoter of purportedly open markets, the U.S. is now leading the way in resurrecting tariff barriers to levels that haven’t been seen on the global stage in decades.
   The military realignments and growing trade barriers will make it increasingly difficult to assemble durable alliances. In the short term the U.S. can leverage its existing power to its advantage, but over the long term other countries will likely pivot away from too much reliance on the U.S. The American Century that publishing magnate Henry Luce famously described in 1941 has to all intents and purposes come to an end.
   China is now a peer competitor to the U.S. in both economic and military power. Increasingly, under the powerful leadership of Xi Jinping, China openly seeks a more Sino-centric world order with institutions and a global arrangement to match. To that end, it is assembling an axis of resistance to a U.S.-dominated world order. Russia, suffering from post-imperial syndrome, is an important member but not an equal partner.
   Russian power is limited to establishing a Eurasian sphere of influence across its former Soviet republics and disrupting liberal democracies. But in that, Russia is more of a spoiler than an architect of the new order.
   And then there is Europe, facing what British Prime Minister Keir Starmer referred to as a “generational challenge” as the U.S. pivots away from Europe toward the Indo-Pacific just as Russia poses a more serious threat to Europe, especially for its easternmost states.
   Europe is remilitarizing after decades of demilitarizing. Sweden and Finland joined NATO in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In the coming decades, Europe could emerge as an independent source of both economic and military power with a different agenda from the U.S. – more keen to confront Russia, less willing to support Israel, and perhaps more willing to engage with China.

   But all three power centers – the U.S., China and Europe – will struggle with similar and unique internal challenges.
   All of them have sluggish economies and aging populations. The U.S. faces growing inequality and political instability as it shifts from a liberal democracy to competitive authoritarianism. China has an untested military, a looming demographic crisis, a faltering economy and a forthcoming succession struggle.
   Finally, Europe is beset with a nationalist populism and growing social welfare costs just as military expenditures are set to increase.
   The growth of the Global South
   This threefold division is strangely reminiscent of the tripartite global division in George Orwell’s “1984,” where Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia fought a permanent war of shifting alliances.
   But Orwell was writing at a time when much of what is now called the Global South was either under the informal or formal control of the superpowers. That is no longer the case in the Global South, especially in the case of the larger countries such as Brazil, India and Indonesia.
   The Global South is not yet a coherent bloc, more an informal arrangement of independent actors that tend to hedge between the major powers.
   A world in flux
   Yet none of this new global reality means that things are now fixed. Indeed, the new world order is in a state of disruptive flux that promises years of growing pains. Both the U.S. and China need allies, and countries in the Global South will continue to hedge between the competing powers.

   As such, the world is in for a process of constant jostling as the major powers seek alliances while dealing with domestic pressures. In that messy status quo, many questions remain: Who will be most effective in building durable alliances? Will China manage its internal challenges? Will Europe get its act together? Will Russia continue its disruptive ways? Could a post-Trump U.S., post-Putin Russia and post-Xi China move the world in yet a different direction altogether?
   And there is one large question above all others: Can the major powers manage their competition through shared global interests, such as combating climate change, environmental pollution and pandemic threats? Or will mounting conflict in the newly contested areas of the Arctic, cyberspace, outer space and the oceanic realm, and in ongoing geopolitical hot spots provide the trigger for outright conflict?
   All world orders come to an end. The hope is the old one is doing so with a whimper rather than a bang.

   In the new world order, small countries may face significant challenges but can also find opportunities for strategic advantage.
   Shifting Power Dynamics
As larger nations assert their influence, small countries may struggle to maintain autonomy. However, they can leverage their unique positions to act as mediators or hubs for diplomacy, fostering relationships between larger powers.
   Economic Opportunities
Small nations can benefit from niche markets and specialized industries, attracting foreign investment. By focusing on sectors like technology, tourism, or renewable energy, they can enhance their economic resilience.
   Regional Alliances
Forming coalitions with neighboring countries can amplify their voices on the global stage. Collaborative efforts in trade, security, and environmental issues can provide small nations with greater leverage against larger powers.
   Adaptation to Global Trends
Embracing globalization and technological advancements can help small countries innovate and compete. By investing in education and infrastructure, they can better position themselves in a rapidly changing world economy.
   In summary, while small countries may encounter difficulties in a multipolar world, strategic adaptation and collaboration can lead to favorable outcomes.

   Loading…
4. 

   Dirt Farmer

   February 3, 2026 at 3:35 pm

   
   

   It’s here!

   A new world order isn’t coming, it’s already here − and this is what it looks like:

   On Sept. 3, 2025, China celebrated the 80th anniversary of its victory over Japan by staging a carefully choreographed event in which 26 world leaders were offered a podium view of Beijing’s impressive military might.
   The show of strength was deliberate and reignited a debate in Western media over whether we are on the cusp of a China-centric “new world order” to replace the U.S.-dominated international “rules-based order.”
   But as someone who writes about geopolitics, I believe we are already there. It might be in flux, and the U.S. still has a big role in it, but a new world order has begun – and as it develops, it will look increasingly different than what it’s replacing.
   A brief history of world orders
   Global history can be understood as the rise and fall of different orders, defined as a given era’s dominant power relations and attendant institutions and norms.
   From 1815 to 1880, the United Kingdom was the undisputed world superpower, with an empire and navy that spanned the globe. The period from 1880 to 1945 was one of imperial rivalries as other countries – largely European and the U.S. – sought to copy Britain’s success and replace its dominance. Supplanting that was the bipolar world of two competing superpowers, the Soviet Union and the U.S., marking the period from 1945 to 1991.
   The fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of a brief period, from 1991 to 2008, of a unipolar world centered on U.S. global dominance, military power and economic might. With the retreat of global communism, the U.S. increased its influence, and that of the international rules-based order it helped establish after 1945, through institutions such as the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

   It did not last long in the face of a long war on terrorism, the fiasco of the invasion of Iraq, the long occupation of Afghanistan and finally the 2008 global financial crisis that undermined U.S. strength and weakened domestic support for Washington’s role as the world’s policeman.
   Toward a multipolar world
   In recent years, a new multipolar world has emerged with at least four distinct sources of power.
   The U.S. remains central to this world order. It is blessed with a huge territory, a dynamic economy and the strategic luxury of large oceans on its east and west and much smaller powers to its north and south. The U.S. had a global military presence in the previous bipolar and unipolar order. But the cost of this imperial overstretch has prompted Washington to shift the cost burden toward its former allies, leading to a new militarization in Europe and East Asia where most countries now aim to increase military spending.
   There is also a change in economic arrangements. In the unipolar order, the U.S. promoted a frictionless free trade arrangement and economic globalization. This resulted in the global shift of manufacturing that in turn created a populist backlash in those countries where manufacturing employment was hollowed out.
   Now, economic nationalism is becoming a much more common refrain than free trade. Long the promoter of purportedly open markets, the U.S. is now leading the way in resurrecting tariff barriers to levels that haven’t been seen on the global stage in decades.
   The military realignments and growing trade barriers will make it increasingly difficult to assemble durable alliances. In the short term the U.S. can leverage its existing power to its advantage, but over the long term other countries will likely pivot away from too much reliance on the U.S. The American Century that publishing magnate Henry Luce famously described in 1941 has to all intents and purposes come to an end.
   China is now a peer competitor to the U.S. in both economic and military power. Increasingly, under the powerful leadership of Xi Jinping, China openly seeks a more Sino-centric world order with institutions and a global arrangement to match. To that end, it is assembling an axis of resistance to a U.S.-dominated world order. Russia, suffering from post-imperial syndrome, is an important member but not an equal partner.
   Russian power is limited to establishing a Eurasian sphere of influence across its former Soviet republics and disrupting liberal democracies. But in that, Russia is more of a spoiler than an architect of the new order.
   And then there is Europe, facing what British Prime Minister Keir Starmer referred to as a “generational challenge” as the U.S. pivots away from Europe toward the Indo-Pacific just as Russia poses a more serious threat to Europe, especially for its easternmost states.
   Europe is remilitarizing after decades of demilitarizing. Sweden and Finland joined NATO in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In the coming decades, Europe could emerge as an independent source of both economic and military power with a different agenda from the U.S. – more keen to confront Russia, less willing to support Israel, and perhaps more willing to engage with China.

   But all three power centers – the U.S., China and Europe – will struggle with similar and unique internal challenges.
   All of them have sluggish economies and aging populations. The U.S. faces growing inequality and political instability as it shifts from a liberal democracy to competitive authoritarianism. China has an untested military, a looming demographic crisis, a faltering economy and a forthcoming succession struggle.
   Finally, Europe is beset with a nationalist populism and growing social welfare costs just as military expenditures are set to increase.
   The growth of the Global South
   This threefold division is strangely reminiscent of the tripartite global division in George Orwell’s “1984,” where Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia fought a permanent war of shifting alliances.
   But Orwell was writing at a time when much of what is now called the Global South was either under the informal or formal control of the superpowers. That is no longer the case in the Global South, especially in the case of the larger countries such as Brazil, India and Indonesia.
   The Global South is not yet a coherent bloc, more an informal arrangement of independent actors that tend to hedge between the major powers.
   A world in flux
   Yet none of this new global reality means that things are now fixed. Indeed, the new world order is in a state of disruptive flux that promises years of growing pains. Both the U.S. and China need allies, and countries in the Global South will continue to hedge between the competing powers.

   As such, the world is in for a process of constant jostling as the major powers seek alliances while dealing with domestic pressures. In that messy status quo, many questions remain: Who will be most effective in building durable alliances? Will China manage its internal challenges? Will Europe get its act together? Will Russia continue its disruptive ways? Could a post-Trump U.S., post-Putin Russia and post-Xi China move the world in yet a different direction altogether?
   And there is one large question above all others: Can the major powers manage their competition through shared global interests, such as combating climate change, environmental pollution and pandemic threats? Or will mounting conflict in the newly contested areas of the Arctic, cyberspace, outer space and the oceanic realm, and in ongoing geopolitical hot spots provide the trigger for outright conflict?
   All world orders come to an end. The hope is the old one is doing so with a whimper rather than a bang.

   In the new order, small countries may face significant challenges but can also find opportunities for strategic advantage.
   Shifting Power Dynamics
As larger nations assert their influence, small countries may struggle to maintain autonomy. However, they can leverage their unique positions to act as mediators or hubs for diplomacy, fostering relationships between larger powers.
   Economic Opportunities
Small nations can benefit from niche markets and specialized industries, attracting foreign investment. By focusing on sectors like technology, tourism, or renewable energy, they can enhance their economic resilience.
   Regional Alliances
Forming coalitions with neighboring countries can amplify their voices on the global stage. Collaborative efforts in trade, security, and environmental issues can provide small nations with greater leverage against larger powers.
   Adaptation to Global Trends
Embracing globalization and technological advancements can help small countries innovate and compete. By investing in education and infrastructure, they can better position themselves in a rapidly changing world economy.
   In summary, while small countries may encounter difficulties in a multipolar world, strategic adaptation and collaboration can lead to favorable outcomes.

   Loading…
5. 

   Terence Blackett

   February 4, 2026 at 6:10 am

   
   

   @DirtFarmer

   CAN WE HAVE SOMETHING MORE GERMANE 2 WHAT COME FROM BETWEEN YOUR 2 EARS, PLEASE???

   If you are “INTENT” on “TEXTBOOK” – then #ArtificialIntelligence is NOT* it!!!

   Then 2 be “REPETITIVE” shows a lack of precision, “INDEPTH” analysis & poor analytical thought!!!

   This is what we would expect from the “SPIN-MERCHANTS” @CNN et al

   #CmonMan

   Loading…
6. 

   Terence Blackett

   February 4, 2026 at 6:12 am

   
   

   @DirtFarmer

   CAN WE HAVE SOMETHING MORE GERMANE 2 WHAT COME FROM BETWEEN YOUR 2 EARS, PLEASE???

   If you are “INTENT” on “TEXTBOOK” – then #ArtificialIntelligence is NOT* it!!!

   Then 2 be “REPETITIVE” shows a lack of precision, “INDEPTH” analysis & poor analytical thought!!!

   This is what we would expect from the “SPIN-MERCHANTS” @CNN et al

   #CmonMan

   Loading…
7. 

   Basslines & Ballistics

   February 4, 2026 at 9:11 am

   
   

   Rise Warriors
   Extreme Indigenous Resistance

   The Fire This Time, Basslines & Ballistics, Still Standing On John Wayne’s Head
   

   Loading…
8. 

   Horsemeat

   February 6, 2026 at 9:34 am

   
   

   When will authorities dig up the back nine of the greens at Mar A Lago, to check for bodies?

   Certainly not while Trump is sitting President. Nor Vance.

   But it needs to be done, if what is in the Epstein files are to be believed.

   You should now be understanding just how dire this situation is.

   Loading…
9. 

   Monkey Grinds The Organ

   February 6, 2026 at 9:50 am

   
   

   Trump posts a video of Obamas as monkeys on Truth Social.
   Some people are calling this racist saying he is unfit to be President.

   For two seconds, the video shows the smiling faces of the Obamas superimposed on monkeys bobbing to “The Lion Sleeps Tonight”.

   As of Friday morning, the video has been liked more than 2,500 times and reposted more than 1,100 times, as prominent Democrats decried the post.

   “Disgusting behavior by the President. Every single Republican must denounce this. Now,” said the press office of California governor Gavin Newsom, a longtime Trump critic and potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate.

   “This is overt racism. Full stop. There’s no ‘misinterpretation’ and no excuse. This is who he is, who he’s always been, and why he should never be anywhere near power again,” political strategist Adam Parkhomenko posted on X.

   The video was just one of more than 60 posts the president made on Truth Social over the course of three hours. In addition to repeating lies about the 2020 presidential election, Trump posted the Trump Accounts Super Bowl ad and calls to add his face to Mount Rushmore.

   Loading…
10. 

    PotCallinKettleBlack

    February 6, 2026 at 12:46 pm

    
    

    After the #AMOUNT of shiiite you spew daily on this BLOG, to call out others is special.

    Loading…