← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Dr. Roland R. Clarke

SHOULD BARBADOS INCORPORATE THE PRINCIPLES AND INSTRUMENTS OF  “DIRECT” DEMOCRACY?

1. INTRODUCTION

Democratic systems vary based on citizen involvement and the structure of government. They are primarily categorized into “direct” and “representative” democracies. 

[NB: Barbados currently has a Westminster-derived “representative” democracy.

In a practical and real sense, that means that the elected “representatives” of the People are constitutionally granted “ultimate” power for all but one day in 1,825 days (1 day in 5 years or 99.95 percent of the time) in respect to the governance and governing of Barbados.

The People are relegated to the exercise “influence” through channels such as radio talk shows, social media, labour union action and civil disobedience such as protest marches on the streets.

This author proposes that it would be immensely beneficial and just for Barbados if the  “People” are constitutionally granted greater “rights” of ultimate power. In the short term, this can only be guaranteed by infusing the key principles and instruments of direct democracy into our Westminster-derived republic. 

However, the DNA of a Westminster system is diametrically opposed to that of a direct democracy. Hence under the current system, Barbados would need to continue to “walk and chew gum” and make the two opposing systems work at the same time. That may be treacherous indeed.

This authour believes that The People have demonstrated over the last fifty-nine (59) years of national  independence including the last five (5) years of republichood, their growing and stoic readiness to be firm “craftsmen of our fate.” In the near future, if that means writing and adopting an authentic republican styled constitution from scratch, then so be it.]

Representative democracies are further categorised by virtue of the relationship between the executive and legislative branches [if they exist separately] in presidential, parliamentary, and mixed systems. 

Other categories include variations based on specific features like citizen participation (participatory), the distribution of power (pluralist, elite), and the protection of rights (constitutional).

2. SELECT DEFINITIONS

2.1 A Republic

A republic is a state in which supreme power is held [shared] by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

[NB: In Barbados as a practical matter, the people are limited by the Constitution to the exercise of supreme power to one single day every five years during the national general elections.] 

2.2 Representative Democracy 

This is a system of government where citizens elect representatives to make decisions, laws, and policies on their behalf. 

Instead of voting on every issue directly, the public’s power is exercised indirectly through these elected officials, who are expected to act in the interests of their constituents. 

Examples include the United States and the United Kingdom, where citizens vote for people to represent them in Congress or the House of Commons, respectively.

2.4 Direct Democracy 

Direct democracy is a system of government where citizens vote directly on laws and policies, rather than through elected representatives. 

This allows for maximum citizen participation in the legislative process, though it is often used in conjunction with representative democracy in a system called semi-direct democracy, where citizens can still directly vote on specific issues. 

Common tools or instruments for direct democracy include referendums, initiatives, and recalls.

2.4 People’s Democracy 

A “People’s Democracy” is a political concept, primarily from Marxist-Leninist theory, for a government that is in a transitional stage from capitalism to socialism. 

These states are often led by a single-party (the Communist Party) and are characterized by a multi-class system that, in theory, aims to build a socialist society. Historically, this term was applied to communist states in Eastern Europe after World War II.

[NB: This authour does not recommend an evolution to a People’s Democracy for Barbados. Its definition is included here for educational purposes only.]

3. PRINCIPLES AND INSTRUMENTS OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY 

3.1 The core principles of direct democracy center on the direct and unmediated engagement of citizens in governance, ensuring popular sovereignty and accountability. The primary instruments used to achieve this in modern systems are the referendum, initiative, and recall. 

3.2 Principles of Direct Democracy

3.2.1 Popular Sovereignty

The ultimate power and authority to decide public matters rests with the people, not with elected representatives.

3.2.2 Direct Participation

Citizens are directly involved in the decision-making process, such as voting on specific laws or policies, rather than delegating the power to intermediaries.

3.2.3 Equality of Votes

Every citizen’s vote carries equal weight, regardless of wealth, status, or any other demographic factor.

3.2.4 Accountability

Government officials and legislative bodies are held directly accountable to the public and must act in accordance with the citizens’ will.

3.2.5 Transparency and Information: 

Government actions and information should be open and accessible to the public, allowing citizens to be well-informed before making decisions.

3 2.6 Majority Rule with Minority Protection

While decisions are made by majority vote, the process should include safeguards (such as constitutional rights) to protect the fundamental rights of minorities and prevent the “tyranny of the majority”.

3.2.7 Reversibility of Decisions

Popular decisions should not be final and can be reconsidered or updated through subsequent votes, reflecting an ongoing process of deliberation.

3.3 Instruments of Direct Democracy

These tools are typically used within broader representative systems (known as semi-direct democracies) to provide a check on the legislature. 

3.3.1 Referendum (or Plebiscite): 

This mechanism allows the electorate to vote on a specific political, constitutional, or legislative issue.

3.3.2 Mandatory Referendum

A vote that is automatically triggered and required by law (usually the constitution) for certain important issues, such as constitutional amendments or joining a supranational organization.

3.3 3 Popular/Optional Referendum

Citizens can demand a public vote on existing legislation passed by the legislature by collecting a required number of signatures, essentially granting the public a veto power over laws.

3.3.4 Advisory Referendum

The government or legislature can initiate a referendum to gauge public opinion, but the outcome is non-binding.

3.3.5 Initiative (or Citizens’ Initiative) 

This empowers citizens to propose new laws or constitutional amendments directly.

3.3.6 Direct Initiative

A proposed measure that meets the signature requirements is placed directly on the ballot for a popular vote.

3.3.7 Indirect Initiative: 

The proposal is first submitted to the legislature for consideration; if the legislature fails to act within a certain timeframe, the proposal then moves to a popular vote.

3 3.7 Recall

This process enables citizens to remove an elected official from office before the end of their term through a petition and a subsequent popular vote.

3.3.9 Popular Assemblies (e.g., Landsgemeinde, Town Meetings)

In some smaller, local jurisdictions, citizens physically gather in a public assembly to deliberate and vote on policies. 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

In view of the foregoing, this authour recommends the following strategy for Barbados:

1. In the short term, The People of Barbados should advocate for the infusion of the principles and instruments of direct democracy as “rights” into the current Westminster-derived constitution of Barbados.

2. In the medium term, The People of Barbados together with their elected representatives should take steps to write and adopt an authentic republican constitution for Barbados.

REFERENCES 

Principles and Instruments of Direct Democracy 

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

[2] https://www.britannica.com/topic/direct-democracy

[3] https://participedia.net/method/direct-democracy

[4] https://www.democracy-international.org/direct-democracy

[5] https://www.cgdev.org/blog/8-principles-direct-democracy

[6] https://www.britannica.com/topic/direct-democracy/Issues-and-controversies

[7] https://aceproject.org/ace-en/focus/direct-democracy/onePage

[8] https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/direct-democracy-the-international-idea-handbook/direct-democracy-the-international-idea-handbook-overview-EN.pdf

[9] https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/direct-democracy-primer.pdf

______

PS: All references attributable to Google AI


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

9 responses to “Should Barbados Embrace Direct Democracy?”


  1. A simple but pertinent question – why do a majority of Barbadians not give a damn? Such a mindset contradicts how we should govern in a republic.


  2. David,

    Still reading. Then there’s the re-read and the contemplation.


  3. TOO MUCH FLUFF, BRUH – GIVEN BRITAIN HAS THE OLDEST PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY IN WORLD, BUT LOOK AT THE CRAP* GOING ON IN THEIR POLITICOSPHERE – FOR IF WE WANTED COMPLEXITY, WE OUGHT 2 ENGAGE QUANTUM MECHANICAL COSMOLOGY

    Look, the “WAR” is lost – “FORGET” the daily battles, (THERE IS NO REDEMPTION) 4 all nations are heading “ONE” of “TWO” directions & the “OUTCOME” is inevitable!!!

    THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN* INTENDS TO CONTROL PLANET EARTH & ITS INHABITANTS BY ANY & ALL MEANS NECESSARY – THERE’S NO ESCAPE (except for what has been “WRITTEN DOWN” before the foundation of the world)!!!

    Small island thinking will sooner than later have 2 play catch UP*!!!

    THE BRAVE NEW WORLD IS HERE – THE DUTTY* BASTERD NEW WORLD IS RIGHT ALONGSIDE IT!!!

    We know what’s coming, as much as we know what’s already here, but the “DENIALISM(s)” is the “NEW PATHOLOGY”!!!

    The “TALKING-HEADS” who know where we’re heading are already “FEARFUL” – as they know that the horse has bolted out the stable, & there’s no coming back!!!

    #NotMyWords

    #TheGlitteratiSaidItAll



  4. Forget about everything but the Barbados slip into a socialist republic, which will eventually develop into a nasty communist system. Because you have a person called Comrade, leading you, that has those nasty communist ideas that Ralph Gonsalves gradually introduced into SVG in the hope of developing it into a satellite state of Cuba. Take a long, hard look and see if the followers of BLP are being brainwashed and peasantised like those in the ULP in SVG. If your current political system, based on the Westminster style, is not broken, do not try and fix it. The thing to fix is the socialist scum that is influencing Barbados and making everyone a peasant to ensure control of the same.


  5. We are neither a representative nor a direct democracy. We are a leadership democracy. The will of our beloved Supreme Leader is the will of her people. She is simultaneously the supreme judge, legislator and executor of the will of her people.

    The separation of powers and party pluralism are relics of a bygone era. Strong leadership, on the other hand, represents the future and progress.

    Tron


  6. “The thing to fix is the socialist scum that is influencing Barbados and making everyone a peasant to ensure control of the same.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~
    Though well intended, this analysis is oxymoronically flawed.

    The “power that bee” currently influencing Barbados CANNOT be classified as ‘socialist’, since socialism is defined as:
    “a political and economic philosophy advocating for social (public or collective) ownership/control of the means of production (factories, resources) rather than private, aiming for economic equality, shared wealth, and meeting human needs over profit, often through government regulation, social welfare, and democratic processes.”

    The records CLEARLY show that while making false commitments and promises in line with socialist ideals, our ‘influencers’ have fast tracked the transfer of national assets to wealthy bribe masters, foreign profit seekers, local political contributors, AND EVEN TO IMMIGRANT SQUATTERS, over and above ordinary residents, who are:
    -increasingly poor
    -increasingly victims of murder and crime
    -subjected to worsening bad roads and unreliable transportation services
    -piss poor public services
    -disgraceful medical services
    -clueless and misguided educational policies
    -etc etc etc

    Correction:
    “The thing to fix is the MAFIA scum that is influencing Barbados and making everyone a peasant to ensure control of the same.”

    What a place we have become!


  7. Nuh lotta long talk. It should read “captalist” scum”. Of the ideologies, socialism is the best. The problem is with the implementation.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading