← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Heather Cole

What Was Exchanged for This Giveaway?

On February 25th 2025, a notice was placed in the print media by the Director, Planning and Development Department of an application by Afreximbank to develop land at Jemmotts Lane.  The description of the project was for a hotel and office facility including a conference center. The notice also stated that persons who wished to view the file could do so on the department’s website and that there were 14 days within which to object to the plans. The direct link for the file is – Erection (in principle) of a Hotel and Office Facility including Conference Centre.

It was reported in Barbados Today that “Opposition Leader Ralph Thorne has raised “serious concerns” over the recent vesting of 2.037 hectares of prime state-owned land at the corner of Bay Street and Jemmott’s Lane to the Afro African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank), free of cost. ” Then someone shared what appears to be the official unsigned document regarding the vesting of the property based on Cap 225 of the Laws of Barbados. In essence the Leader of the Opposition had raised the alarm. 

Cap 225 of the Laws of Barbados pertains to the Acquisition and Disposal of Crown Land. These are land that belonged to the English Crown and are now the property of the people of Barbados.  In essence, our and our children’s birthright.

By definition, when a buyer purchases real property, the manner in which they will hold the title on that property is known as vesting. Most Barbadians would be familiar with this term when crown land is being vested in the National Housing Corporation to build government housing or to subdivide for sale. 

After reading the Act, when crown lands are vested to another government entity, it is treated like a transfer for better management by the public service. For example, the Minister of Housing and Lands vesting lands to the NHC to undertake sales or building. Besides this exception Section 5 of Cap 225 of the laws of Barbados in my opinion only refers to the sale of land or property not giving away land without payment.  It specifically states that the funds from the purchase are to be stored in the Consolidated Funds.  It causes one to ponder on the legality of government giving away the land at Jemmotts Lane without receiving payment when the Act specifically states that payment is to be received and where it should be held.

The Leader of the Opposition Ralph Thorne rightly queried if the government of Barbados was a member of Afrexinmbank. Only under that condition could this vesting be treated like an internal transfer as in the case of the lands being given to the Caribbean Development Bank. Barbados is one of the member countries of the Caribbean Development Bank.

There was a deliberate attempt to deceive Barbadians.  The notice was placed in the newspaper on February 25th, 2025 requesting objections in 14 days yet there was a document of Parliament dated Wednesday March 12, 2025 when the official deadline for the submission of objections on the Department’s website was March 14th, 2025.  This matter should not have gone to Parliament until after March 14th if there were no objections and later than this date if there were objections.

Whereas the notice from the Planning and Development Department states that the purpose of the development is for a hotel, office facility and conference center, the unsigned document of Parliament only states that it is for a Trade Center.

All we know is that Afreximbank is a for profit commercial entity which has billions of dollars in assets and that the government of Barbados has entered into a memorandum of understanding for trade and investment with this entity. It makes one wonder why such a wealthy bank cannot afford to pay for the property at Jemmotts Lane.  Despite what the Minister of Housing and Lands said, that there are significant benefits to be gain from that bank, one can argue that we have derived significant benefits from the world bank and other financial institutions without giving them free land from which they also intended to profit.  Ultimately, based on the law no memorandum of understanding entitles Afreximbank to free land in Barbados!

If it continues like this not even the sea water and sand will be left for the people of Barbados. They tested us with Mrs. Ram Merchandani’s property and we did not stand up for her. Then they started selling out our public places and now they have sunk to an all-time low of giving away what is left. As a people, we have to get to the bottom of this, even if it is pursued through the court of law.  No one is above to law and this selling out and give away of our inheritance has to stop.  Politicians are just our stewards.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

267 responses to “Land ‘Giveaway’?”


  1. The Speaker’s say

    SPEAKER OF the House of Assembly Arthur Holder issued the following statement in response to yesterday’s SUNDAY SUN Front Page story on a draft special audit report by the Auditor General’s Office: “A report was published by the SUNDAY SUN of March 16, 2025 . . . . The Parliament of Barbados has not published any report of any Special Audit On The Building Programmes of HOPE by the Auditor General. In fact, the Parliament of Barbados has not even received any such report.

    Under Section 77 (5) of the Public Finance Management Act, 2019, it is required that any such report must be submitted to the Speaker of the House of Assembly who must lay the same as soon as possible thereafter.

    It should also be noted that any publication of this alleged report cannot receive any privilege accorded to the Parliament of Barbados.”

    Source: Nation


  2. Did you know that title to Pool Land, the site of another HOPE debacle, may have been clouded since 1847 by the actions of Samuel Hall Lord?

    True True fact!!

    “The association of the Lord family with Long Bay (and with the Pool estate) is a little complex. The Lord family had owned Long Bay ‘since the C18th’ according to a family historian. Samuel Lord’s parents, John Lord (?-1799) and Bathsheba Lord (c.1747-1820), had owned it. The property was to be divided between Samuel and his brother, John Thomas, on the death of their mother. However, in 1809 there was a conveyance of Long Bay from Bathsheba Lord to Samuel and John Thomas in exchange for an annuity so long as she lived. In 1817 Samuel Lord conveyed to his sister, Elizabeth Sarsfield Lord, his half-share in Long Bay (and his half-share in the Pool estate) in exchange for £35,000. This was possibly because Samuel faced charges of perjury and forgery at the time, though he was cleared of the charges by 1820. And there is no evidence that Elizabeth actually paid any of the £35,000. In any event, the half-shares were re-conveyed to Samuel by Elizabeth in 1834.
    John Thomas Lord died in 1818, leaving his half-share in Long Bay (and also his half-share in Pool) to his son, John. However, as John died in 1821 (aged 14 and in ‘mysterious circumstances’), the half-shares in Long Bay and Pool went to Samuel and his daughters, Elizabeth and Frances. However, 1826 Elizabeth died; Frances, a minor, thus owned 2/3 of a half-share of both Long Bay and Pool while Samuel owned 1/3 of a half-share. The remaining half-share owned by Samuel’s sister, Elizabeth Sarsfield until 1834 when she re-conveyed the property. Hence, Samuel became the owner of 2/3 and Frances 1/3 of the estates.
    In 1840 Frances married Captain Charles Trolllope, later General Sir Charles Trollope, the younger son of Sir John Trollope of Casewick, Lincolnshire. Frances agreed to relinquish her rights in Long Bay and Pool in return for an annuity of £1,000 p.a.. But Samuel never paid this; and after his death litigation led to the Trollopes getting possession of Long Bay and Pool after purchasing outstanding interests from mortgagees in 1847.


  3. Somebody needs to give a release on the land looks like to me.

    Like Kingsland!!


  4. RAT has spoken shite. For to equate the cost, because land has no value, unlike what we hear a lot of idiots in public places arguing, with some demand that the GoB owns some part of a wholly private sector bank, where all the capital is contributed by the private sector, where government will not contribute a penny beyond land, represents the height of ignorance by a RAT.

    Why would a private company which has accountabilities to capital investors would have to assign interests in other peoples’ capital to a government.

    RAT went on to talk more shiiite bout the CDB. The CDB is a different animal all together. That structure was purely governmental. At the CDB we have governments which are non-borrowing members, like México, which contributed capital as a way of helping it’s neighbours and as part of their own national self interests.

    But that a man who expects to be PM would suggest this bullshiite, appears not to understand that Afreim, nor any other outfit, will never assign the rights to other peoples’ capital contributions to a feckless set of governments anywhere.

    We did not hear these fucked up arguments in relationship to the ten of millions in concessoons given to Sándalo Why should Afreim be any less positioned – because deh Black?


  5. At 67 years old Thorne cannot be harboring even a remote thought of being PM of Barbados. On current trajectory the blogmaster has the DLP in the frame for 3 seats.


  6. That might be a blessing for the country. For we cannot detect any measurable difference between this DLP and the one humbled twice.


  7. However, he seems like he maybe around for a while yet. He looks fitter than the average 67 year old Bajan. He does not eat like a hog, as Don Blackman has said about some Bajans.

    The opposition leader in TNT is 72.


  8. https://www.youtube.com/live/19ndHxlReFY?si=9rWMjkuYX34tH5YS

    William Skinner

    Give me reading of what’s happening in TNT. Rowley retires. Young is the new PM. Elections soon.

  9. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Pacha
    One question. What is the bank doing with hotel lands? You figure they building and running hotels now.


  10. Pachaman you talking shite
    Cost or no cost Thorne was absolutely correct in his analysis of the free give away of land
    Mek it mek sense for an unknown entity not economically or socially familiar to the Barbados landscape such bank receives free land a land which can be used mostly as the beneficiary feels purposed
    Not to mention the shareholders who would also received any benefits from the bank access of ownership of the free land


  11. NO

    They will build a hotel and a headquarters building. It seems that they need a place to house they people as they come and go. Of course, depending on the number of rooms they may also intend to accommodate regular travellers.

    You may need to go to Afrika to see the levels of sophistication of people like this. For it would be a fatal error to make assumptions entirely based on what you have known, in Barbados, Canadá, America.


  12. AC

    Just a few months ago you were against the RAT and would have preferred a motley group of idiots, without a seat in parliament, to be eschonced within George Street.

    At that time Pacha was maybe the most vocal writer here in support of RAT.

    Now that you have found the “balls” to defend RAT you should consider first how a non-partisan could have served the DLPs interests better than a yardfowl like you.

    You are the very organisms which are killing this DLP. For you only know how to bark when the leader say so. Whereas, Pacha has no such obligations.


  13. Afro African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank)

    The African Development Bank Group

    “The Caribbean Development Bank is a regional financial institution, established by an Agreement that was signed in 1969. CDB intends to be the leading catalyst for development resources in the Region, working in an efficient, responsive and collaborative manner with Borrowing Member Countries and other development partners towards the systematic reduction of poverty in their countries through sustainable development.”


  14. Let us hope he wins a seat next election. At the moment it appears to be an optimistic position to hold.


  15. Pachhsman don’t care who they gonna house without the land they would be no house cause this entity understand the economics of havin a long term strategy who which would be of benefit to the bank and shareholders by avoiding out of pocket expense to buy and build
    Man up and understand what has happened
    Govt put the interest of the barbadian people behind for promises without guarantees of knowing how the world economies would react during economic turmoil as is being witnessed presently


  16. He needs to find another constituency. Maybe he has already.


  17. But then again the party has never be known to constantly be doing polls to measure relative strengths.

    We fear guesswork will be involved.


  18. His best option is St. Philip North of the undeclared constituencies in the blogmaster’s opinion.


  19. One question. What is the bank doing with hotel lands? You figure they building and running hotels now.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    LOL
    Mix commerce and our NO 1 business …and you can BET that in a few years, half of the hotels and related businesses in Brassbados will have a brand new monopoly owner…

    It is why lending institutions are HEAVILY REGULATED wrt their business interests…

    But this BB Land N.O.
    No concerns here…
    What a place …!!


  20. @Bush Tea

    It is a development bank where Board policy governs and international agreements apply.


  21. Don’t know for certain but based on past experience we’ll expect a seven star hotel. Is there any in Barbados?

    Do people really expect that these types of players want the rundown shiiite stock in Barbados. Only to knock them down.

    Bajans have this way of thinking that there’s no better world than that known to them.


  22. Within the global market current stages as it continues to take a nose dive who then can tell the bank that it can’t sell land and properties attached
    Then what ?
    With all possibities the new owners can stand on legal grounds and not honour any promises the bank made to govt
    which all but leave govt holding an empty bag
    Banks don’t work for govt interest however when entaglements such as giveaways make way on the table they are all but happy to grab looking towards a policy which benefits mostly the shareholders while govt snatched the peanuts falling off the table

  23. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Pacha
    Shite man given all the pot shots you’ve been taking at WS & BT, now a potential 7 ⭐ hotel, possibly to fully make your day, they maybe hiring GAESA to run it.


  24. “There was a deliberate attempt to deceive Barbadians. The notice was placed in the newspaper on February 25th, 2025 requesting objections in 14 days yet there was a document of Parliament dated Wednesday March 12, 2025 when the official deadline for the submission of objections on the Department’s website was March 14th, 2025. This matter should not have gone to Parliament until after March 14th if there were no objections and later than this date if there were objections.”

    Nobody is going to tell Heather that the vesting of land (Parliament) and a planning application (TPD) are two separate processes that are mutually exclusive? The request for objections had nothing to do with vesting. As far as I know, you don’t even have to own the land to submit a planning application. Governments across the world use various mechanisms to spur urban regeneration: compulsory acquisition (Ram-Hyatt) and vesting of public lands. I keep saying too many here know everything about nothing. Heather can’t even set up a meeting turn but BU expects her to wax lyrically on vesting and planning laws.


  25. I don’t think that any Bajan, believe or not, would understands these levels of SERQUAL. But maybe we’re wrong. True, we got a few people from Sandy Lane a five star. A few other places. Maybe!


  26. No

    I don’t mind dem gallows baits. They are both village boys who believe that within their minds resides all the knowledge there is.

  27. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    Rowley’s departure is welcomed in some quarters. He was never that popular since he spent several years undermining Manning. However he has displayed astute politics both as party leader and PM.
    Young is considered to be competent and extremely bright ; while he is well liked , many believe that he is not the usual charismatic figure such as Panday and of course Williams.
    While an election will most likely come this year, the major change is that the PNM, has a very large number of young candidates drawn from the Indo population and Black youth as well. They(PNM) will certainly have an edge with young voters from the wider community (both races) and this will hurt the UNC.
    On the other side there are many departures from the UNC because the party wants Kamla out but she has refused. It’s widely believe that the PNM will prevail if Kamla doe not relinquish leadership. If she moves, the belief is that the PNM still has the edge at the moment. The UNC is apparently having a difficult time finding candidates.
    All in all it’s politics as usual but highly entertaining because of the Trinis’ unique personality.


  28. A 7 star hotel on the land side backing onto the low income housing behind it, with no beach front to top it all off. Can’t see that happening.

    We talking about developing that beach front, but look at what is on the other side of the road to the proposed Hyatt. A run down Bay Street with empty buildings. If you come up bay street from say the old DETCO motors all the way to the traffic lights, what do you have on the landslide? I think it will take alot more to make that area upmarket than what is proposed.


  29. @John A

    Enuff has been all over this blog in recent years preaching gentrification, maybe this is the plan?


  30. @Enuff

    Thanks for enlightening the blog, all concede you are a man very knowledgeable on these kinds of matters.


  31. @David
    These building plans look mighty interesting. I wonder if they will move those 2-3 shops round the corner and if the ladies of the night will get precast kiosks to operate from!

    Those who have traversed that area from when it was MoH with short cuts through to Nelson Street and St. Ambrose Church would understand fully.

    Interesting times!!!


  32. WS

    Thanks. Do you get the idea that Rowley was pushed?

    This PNM government seems to have been fairly corruption free

    As opposed the the last UNC one which was characterized by scandal.

    Rowley seemed like a stickler against corruption, for openness, good governance etc

    The transition seems quite orderly. And if that is so the likelihood for infighting would then be remote.

    And the issue of race. Seems like a UNC still relies on this fracture to divide and conquer. Will this ever end in TNT, given the UNC’s predetermination?


  33. David
    “Enuff has been all over this blog in recent years preaching gentrification, maybe this is the plan?”

    Not gentrification, regeneration.

    JohnA
    Google regeneration, revitalisation, renewal etc in the dictionary.


  34. Apologies Sir.


  35. @ Enuff

    Google long talk and party promises. When you done Google realty vs fiction as well.

    Wait when the greenhouse project you was talking about 2 years ago going start. I guess that falls into facts vs fiction. LOL


  36. @ David

    So we got to give away a massive piece of state land worth millions to bring a bank here is that the plan? So what the said bank going to GUARANTEE for this ” gift” from the Barbadian masses? The first 100 car loans going be free or what?

    Ask Enuff if there is any truth that this bank will be the state bank for its daily operations.

    With everything I see happen to Holetown I don’t put nothing past nobody!

  37. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Pacha
    No. He said that he was not going to contest anymore elections , when he won the last one. He has kept his word. There has been some talk of corruption but nothing really stuck. One or two matters found their way to the court but they all fizzled . So, in terms of corruption, it has been a rather quiet period. However, the talk of favoritism to party members and so is really par for the course .
    Unfortunately, Kamla has been rather reckless when it comes to race. However, there seems to be very positive relations between the youth of different ethnicities . It’s by no means perfect. However, we can’t underestimate the academic brilliance of the youth . They are very deceptive with their skills and they seldom brag about their careers and academic achievements.
    Interesting : Rowley and Manning were both geologists.
    Young is a lawyer, Williams Historian
    Note that our PMs were mainly lawyers. Exceptions : Arthur Economist; Sandiford Educator.



  38. Afreximbank deal raises money laundering, bribery red flags, report claims


    AFRICA / FEBRUARY 27, 2023 / BY JENNY MESSENGER 


    A US$30mn revolving trade finance facility awarded by the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) to South Sudanese company Trinity Energy has drawn scrutiny after its implementation raised a host of red flags for trade-based money laundering (TBML) and bribery.


    Following a three-year investigation into the deal, corruption-tracking organisation The Sentry says that the facility, first agreed in 2018, enabled “the creation of a parallel revenue source and avenues for off-book spending that avoid public scrutiny and are vulnerable to capture by self-interested individuals and elites”.


    Afreximbank agreed a series of loans of US$30mn to Trinity Energy, guaranteed by the Bank of South Sudan, for the import of diesel and gasoline. The energy company drew letters of credit (LCs) under the facility to buy fuel from a Kenyan firm, which it sold to the South Sudan market.


    The deal also saw the government of South Sudan award more than 40% of the crude oil cargoes it contracted from June 2018 to May 2019 to Trinity Energy. These were then sold on to Glencore Singapore.


    The arrangement was intended to address South Sudan’s lack of refining capacity and pump US dollars into the country’s depleted reserves of hard currency.


    But in a report titled Crude Dealings, published on February 21, The Sentry voices concerns over indications of illegal activity stemming from the way the deal was implemented and calls on Afreximbank, along with the other parties involved, to investigate its dealings with Trinity Energy and the South Sudanese government.


    Signs of potential TBML include Trinity Energy’s alleged concealment of the “illicit exchange of hundreds of thousands of US dollars” by paying fake invoices from a Ugandan company for goods that were never delivered. The Sentry believes that Trinity Energy may have used these transactions to illegally change US dollars for South Sudanese pounds on the black market via a third party, a travel agent based in Juba.


    In a similar example, Trinity Energy is accused of making a “questionable” currency transfer by paying an inflated price of US$200,000 for almost 6,000 bags of sugar from a Ugandan firm, despite being an energy company with no history of sugar trading.


    The Sentry suggests that this too raises questions over whether the trade took place and, if not, whether the payment was a way of disguising foreign exchange transactions.


    Another aspect of the deal under scrutiny is a series of payments totalling US$6.5mn that Trinity Energy spent to secure the deal itself, and to arrange the first two LCs, together worth US$60mn.


    The sums involved – US$2.5mn on fees linked to the Afreximbank facility, US$2.5mn on visits, meetings and travel, and US$1.5mn on “lobbyist fees and facilitation fees” – raised suspicions of bribery, with facilitation payments a particular red flag, The Sentry says.


    Trinity Energy’s former finance director-turned-whistleblower, Biswick Kaswaswa, also alleges that envelopes of cash were given to government officials, while several employees collected earnings far higher than their stated salaries, which Kaswaswa suggests was to create cash funds for business facilitation.


    HR and procurement manager Lual Kur Wiir received US$96,054 from Trinity Energy between May and October 2018, despite earning a monthly salary of just US$40. Trinity Energy’s executive director at the time of the deal, Ann Kathure Rutere, told The Sentry the inflated salaries were paid to wipe out a build-up of arrears. In the case of Kur Wiir, the watchdog calculated that the sum he received would have paid his salary for 200 years.


    The Sentry also claims that the deal was uncompetitive in that it allowed Glencore “privileged access to crude contracts” worth US$376mn, with the commodity trader the only one named in the deal as original offtaker.


    In a statement provided to GTR, Glencore says that it “was not a party to the financing arrangements” and “is therefore unable to comment”.


    “Our understanding is that Afreximbank provided various financing facilities to the Government of South Sudan and Glencore was not party to those arrangements in its capacity as a contractual purchaser of crude oil from Trinity Energy,” the commodity trader says, adding that it “has not lifted any crude oil from South Sudan since 2020”.


    Elite connections


    The Sentry also traces multiple links to members of the South Sudanese government and argues that the trade finance facility was a way of allowing the government to move “a substantial portion” of its spending off the books.


    The deal saw fuel supplied to the South Sudanese army at a significantly marked-up price, while Trinity Energy benefitted from exemptions on its fuel imports, suggesting that the government “went out of its way to facilitate the trade finance deal between Trinity Energy and Afreximbank”.


    In return, the government “enjoyed unwritten benefits from its relationship with Trinity Energy, at one time using it for ad hoc fuel supplies to the army and at other times calling on it for injections of emergency cash”.


    Trinity Energy said in response to The Sentry that there were “credibility issues” with Kaswaswa and disputed paying US$1.5mn on lobbyist and facilitation fees. It claims it “has acted in a transparent and bona fide commercial manner in its dealings in the oil market”.


    Afreximbank and Trinity Energy did not respond to GTR’s requests for comment.


    Harry Verhoeven, senior research scholar at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia University, tells GTR that the investigation emphasises how the South Sudanese government has treated the energy sector as “a platform to expand and consolidate political and commercial relations rather than as a key base of the economy to sustain a real developmental agenda”.


    The report shows that energy imports and exports are viewed not as ways to help South Sudan’s citizens and strengthen its economy, Verhoeven says, but “as tools that can be monetised in elite-level competition over resources and political influence”.


    He adds that the report lays bare how the South Sudanese government has “external enablers, including global oil traders…but also regional neighbours such as Kenya and Uganda, where key political, commercial and military actors have long benefited from South Sudanese land, oil, financial deposits, without facing any legal or political accountability”.


    South Sudan has suffered a series of catastrophes since gaining its independence in 2011. Civil war broke out in 2013, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 382,900 people, according to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.


    Last year, The Sentry claimed that South Sudanese leaders had allegedly abused a US$993mn LC scheme that deprived the country of food, fuel and medicine, awarding LCs to companies that did not deliver the goods.


  39. NOW it all makes sense.
    Cahill 2


  40. Will read tomorrow. However, our experience with high finance tells us that at certain conjunctures there is always a convergence all kinds of money.

    We had HSBC laundering drug money for the CIA for decades. They see it as a way to run their operations without congressional oversight.

    People in this business, given all the complications, see such congealing from sources both questionable and genuine as virtually impossible to distinguish regardless of the FAFTA and other means designed to help.


  41. WS
    Thanks


  42. @Northern, I think that you are on to something. Banks do not own hotels. Perhaps someone else is getting free land and a loan from the bank. They cannot reveal who they are as it would cause a riot. When the project is complete, the bank sells it to some unidentifiable which repays the bank loan and Barbadians are no wiser.


  43. What nonesense.

    From decades in finance this is a first. That banks don’t own hotels.

    Maybe these same people would also argue that hotels cannot find the present value of government concessions and plug them into their financials. Sandals.

    I know a bank which owns a good mine. A bank can structure its operation in any way to promote the highest levels of efficiency.

    Who gives hotels loans? Don’t they fail sometimes and the bank has to control them at least for a while.


  44. @John at 8:55 AM

    Thirty five thousand pounds in 1817 is worth £3,831,642.40 today or about $9,944,109.94 Barbados dollars.

    How did Elizabeth Sarsfield Lord earn this money?

  45. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Shite Pacha, you sound like a neo-Liberal.
    You know the only folks who broadly supported the Sandals deal were D party supporters. They had no cards, needed a win, presto Sandals.
    If this were not an entity you support, you would be pissing upon it. And MAM even supported Cuba. You may even become a B supporter 😀
    I can’t wait to read you when we find out the GoB gave the Hyatt developers Mrs Ram land, so they had collateral for the big loan the same Bank extended.


  46. Just look at the amount of sawed stone blocks sitting there in derelict buildings like plums for the picking!! Next move is to demolish the buildings, clear the site and sell the stone!! Kleptoe and Son!!

    https://www.facebook.com/100064519851629/posts/1082675337226451/?rdid=xR5mWmG8oRy6TiAr#

    https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/frederic-bastiat/quotes

    When a portion of wealth passes from the person who has acquired it, without his consent and without compensation, to someone who has not created it, whether this is by force or fraud, I say that there has been a violation of property rights and that there has been an act of plunder.

    When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.


  47. Cuhdear Bajan
    March 18, 2025 at 1:47 am
    Rate This

    @John at 8:55 AM

    Thirty five thousand pounds in 1817 is worth £3,831,642.40 today or about $9,944,109.94 Barbados dollars.

    How did Elizabeth Sarsfield Lord earn this money?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    From the sea!!

    Axe the brother Sam.
    BTW

    No slaves trade after 1807!!


  48. FYI Muhdear.

    Bastiat was born in 1801 and died in 1850, two years after the French Revolution of 1848.

    France finally abolished slavery as was the case in Great Britain, in 1848. Victor Shoelcher is usually identified with the abolition of slavery by France, the Wilberforce of France if you like.

    Bastiat was the beneficiary of the thinking that Quakers first pioneered in the 17th century and which led the abolition of slavery in Great Britain in 1833/4. Bastiat’s thinking was informed also by the thinking leading up to the French Revolution of 1848.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution_of_1848

    https://www.senat.fr/connaitre-le-senat/lhistoire-du-senat/dossiers-dhistoire/d36/dossiers-dhistoire-victor-schoelcher-1.html

    Victor Schoelcher – 1848
    Abolitionism appeared in the eighteenth century, supported by the English Quakers and the philosophers of the Enlightenment. In 1788 the Society of the Friends of the Blacks was founded, to which Mirabeau and Abbé Grégoire belonged. The Convention abolished slavery on 4 February 1794 but it was re-established in the colonies by Napoleon Bonaparte in May 1802. Under the July Monarchy, the cause was taken up by various associations. A commission led by de Broglie examined the conditions for a gradual abolition.

    Schoelcher is the heir to these abolitionist currents. He first participated in this fight through his writings, fueled by his many travels, which allowed him to have direct contact with the slave system. In it, he refutes the thesis of racial inequality as well as all anti-abolitionist arguments. Above all, he denounced torture with precision, protested against the Black Code, and condemned the legal status of the slave. It demonstrates, sometimes excessively, the corruption of morals due to slavery, both among slaves and masters. For him, abolition was a republican principle since it was in line with the defence of freedom and equality. It is a “democratic work”.

    Initially, Schoelcher remained in favour of a gradual abolition. But in 1838, he understood the need for immediate abolition, publishing in 1842, Des colonies françaises. Immediate abolition of slavery. He established that this was essential to preserve peace (against possible slave revolts) and the prosperity of the colonies (better profitability of free labor compared to slave labor). Under the July Monarchy, he signed several petitions in this direction, taking care to ensure their publicity through press articles. The revolution of 1848 allowed the completion of his approach. He played a decisive role in convincing the provisional government to abolish slavery immediately, while the latter was still hesitating. The abolition decree was published on 27 April. The prohibition of slavery was confirmed by the text of the constitution of the Second Republic.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading