← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

BU family member asked the following questions directed to the government through its agent the Fair Trading Commission (FTC).

  • How is it even possible for a rate hearing to take three years?
  • Can this be ‘for real’ in 2024 when things change almost daily?
  • How are the intervenors selected? …and what are they expecting to achieve?
  • Are intervenors paid by the FTC?

After reading Minister of Energy Lisa Cummins defence of the Electricity Supply Bill, 2024 the first thought was the blogmaster’s lack of confidence in government. There is too much mistrust in government to encourage public confidence. The blogmaster suspects it has to do with the fact there is an unacceptable level of inefficiency seen at every turn. The latest fiasco being the government forced to delay a decision to remove dark tint from vehicles.

We have laws that govern tints on vehicles; they don’t allow dark tints. It must stop and the Government has set a target date that no later than the 14th of October, persons who are not having tints that are compliant, in other words, the light tint, will be fined… Loop

Here is what ordinary Barbadians must be thinking about the lack of urgency by all parties to regulate the energy sector, including the Barbados Light and Power – the energy sector is too important to Barbados – being a net importer – to encourage regulatory decisions taking 3 years and counting. This lethargy permeates all that we want to do in the country. Nothing is implemented easily and well.

This latest attempt to alienate intervenors from the process must be viewed with suspicion given the track record of successive governments prioritising pandering to investors. Minister Cummins’ assurance that the draft Electricity Supply Bill, 2024 was widely circulated rings hollow because it was the same assurance given to the public regarding the Bail Bill. The Barbados Bar Association rejected the claim.

The previous Decades of deceit: How successive BLP and DLP governments have colluded to bury corruption blog exposes the objective of successive governments. Continue to pander to the narrow interest of capital and to hell with the masses.

The role of intervenors is critical and must not be marginalised by the Mottley government. We are at a critical juncture in our history where political opposition has been weakened given the ongoing ‘challenges’ being experienced by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP).

If the government is committed to implementing renewable energy (RE) solutions, where is the national policy to manage imports of ICE vehicles in Barbados? If government is committed to RE is it accurate to conclude the offshore oil exploration effort has been retired? Given the bevy of public relations resources available to government there is a deafening silence about important matters.

The people must demand respect from those elected to serve them.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

122 responses to “Electricity Supply Bill, 2024: marginalising intervenors”


  1. diversifying.


  2. The OG,

    I will allow you to save face, though your exit lines are inadequate.

    The End


  3. David,

    You know that I don’t get into the nuts and bolts of these issues. I leave that for others. I believe that our problems begin in our minds and nothing will be solved without a reset.

    Our minds are influenced by the words we hear. Many people just mouth things they have repeatedly heard and internalised as truth, without examination.

    I couldn’t bring myself to wade through all the OG’s mumbo jumbo before. I had second hand embarrassment.

    But just this morning I steeled myself and read the last arguments with “examples”. And I could not let that nonsense stand. I crave your indulgence one last time.

    Because that was a million dollar pile of shite there. Or was it two million? 😊

    He is saying that EVERY man has his price but SOME men set the price too high for anyone to be able to pay. So they have a price but cannot be bribed because nobody has enough to do it.. I’m sure that is true of SOME men.

    But we are talking about EVERY MAN!

    These examples do nothing to substantiate the EVERY man argument.

    And if there are people here pontificating who don’t know the difference between SOME men and EVERY man, then we are in more serious trouble than I thought!

    HELP!

  4. William Skinner Avatar

    This thing about having a price makes interesting reading. We keep wondering why did Ms. Watson accept the offer by Thorne to sit in the Senate knowing full well that she could not or would not give him the necessary support. What was the price for wanting to be a senator ?


  5. 1/2
    I thought that I had put this matter to rest, but I now fear  that   my  signal  of  growing  tired  of   this  “dance  on  a  pinhead” may have emboldened my opponent. 

    I am amused at the intense desire to take my scalp as a trophy and it appears she has persuaded herself that she has done so.

    I am also fully aware of the Bajan’s desire to have the last word; in fact, though it is not one of my character flaws, I occasionally detect some of this trait/behavio rin myself.

    I promise you that 2/2 will be my last effort for the phrase “a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still” rings loudly in my ear.

    I will not get into ‘reading to respond’ or ‘reading skills’ as I need not claim any high ground. I will let my effort speak for itself.

    Can you (yes you) wait for 2/2 and then get in the last word. I will be back.


  6. People who infer Tricia Watson has a price condone and support Ralph’s behvaiour in the party Coup and/or the remnants of the DLP party after several resignations.
    The biggest criticism of Ralph Thorne by the public is possibly his treatment of Tricia Watson and that was after he was already unpopular with maybe up to half the party after his treatment of Yearwood. He will have to pay the price when he flops in the next GE

    ‘Everyone has a price’ logic should be applied to poor youths engaging in crime as they are easy to recruit with a small financial incentive.


  7. IPCC releases report showing man made carbon dioxide emissions not linked to climate change

    And how many billions of dollars are Emera and other energy companies and mankind in general wasting on the increasingly frantic but useless efforts to reduce CO2 emissions in order to supposedly reduce harmful effects of global warming/climate change.

    Attempting to switch to available green energy sources by increasing use of intermittent solar and wind power according to this latest IPCC report (below) will have as much effect on global temperatures as I will have on sea levels by attempting to empty the Atlantic ocean using a bucket with a whole in the bottom.

    IPCC releases report showing man made carbon dioxide emissions not linked to climate change

    A report from the IPCC indicates that Earth’s warming trend is not caused by human-related activities but by changes in the planet’s albedo.

    Ned Nikolov – a scientist specialising in climate, cosmology and astrophysics – and Karl Zeller – a climate scientist and Nikolov’s longtime research associate – argue that the IPCC’s data interpretation of the data is flawed and that atmospheric pressure plays a more significant role in global warming than greenhouse gases.

    Nikolov and Zeller suggest that the IPCC has misrepresented, and potentially falsified, CERES, data on solar and long-wave radiation to fit the prevailing narrative of human-induced climate change, specifically by inverting trends in solar energy absorption.

    Based on his analysis of NASA’s CERES data, Nikolov suggests that all global warming observed in the past 24 years can be attributed to increased solar energy absorption due to reduced cloud cover, not rising CO2 levels.

    “This is not my theory,” Nikolov said. “It comes directly from satellite data that NASA has provided. It’s on their website.”

    More:
    https://expose-news.com/2024/10/03/the-sun-drives-the-earths-climate/

    And see this:
    Carbon Emissions CANNOT Cause ‘Global Warming

    Many people who fell for hoax #1, i.e. the guaranteed “safe and effective” experimental vaccine hoax will no doubt continue to remain true believers in hoax #2, (the, UN’s and WEF’s hobby horse of man made global warming nonsense).


  8. @NorthernObserver October 2, 2024 at 10:56 am

    Heartbreaking.

    Every time I have to go to town, I must see the remnants of that “project” at the bottom of University Hill. It is an awful eyesore. The one “show house” that was built has become vandalized and derelict, overtaken by bush, but unfortunately not enough bush yet to hide the eyesore.

    A simple question: if so much money was spent on that “project” why can’t any of the recipients of that money see what HURTS MY EYES every time I pass, and use some of the money generated by that “project’ to bulldoze and landfill the derelict remnants of the show house?

    And if the “showhouse” was an example of luxury building, how come it looks so stink so soon, while the house my father built with his own hands for his family in 1951 is still standing, in good condition, and occupied everyday from 1951 to the present?


  9. @William

    Maybe Tricia Watson aspired to political leadership?


  10. Almost finished with my task.
    It just dawn on me that “the A Guy” has been missing in action for quite some time.
    Might have to call him “The AG” but the A may go to his head.
    A Guy, I hope all is well with him.


  11. @Skinner

    The senate at $1600 a month and losing 4 working days every month is a prize though? Did she go to Thorne and ask to be in the senate, or did he go to her and ask her to join with him? You really think she begged him to be in the senate? Thorne, DLP, and Barbados are on the losing end of that fiasco except that she still representing Barbadians in FTC electricity cases. So she still really helping us save some money every month. You realize she is the person that broke the news to Barbadians about this electricity law even though she is not in the parliament? Not Thorne or the DLP. Not Cummins and the BLP. Not Trevor Browne nor the engineers group neither. Not all the people that suddenly got nuff to say about it. What Thorne doing to help Barbadians? I would like her to take on Water Authority, Flow and Digicel. What Thorne and the DLP saying about them?


  12. 2/2 (This may be long)
    It is with the greatest of reluctance that I returned to this item. I thought of the punishment of Sisyphus whose punishment was to roll a stone uphill (daily) and then have it roll down the hill at the end of his day. “Oh Sisyphus, I envy thee for thou hast a glimmer of hope that your task would be ending”.

    I thank the Good Lord that I was spared Cuhdear ‘flying in” (on a plane of course) and adding her voice to the discussion and I doubly thank him that though there was an appeal to the blogmaster to add his voice we were spared his Don Quixote appearance. We all know “Sir Galahad he is not”.

    I spoke in jest but will now return to the serious matter at hand.

    “Everyone has a price”
    I must confess that I do not read everything that you write. My tolerance for errors is very limited and once I see you venturing off the correct path and down a rabbit hole then I turn away. It is amusing to see you emerge from the hole waving a flag and taking a victory lap.

    From your bits that I read, the great flaw in your reasoning is that Bold (serif):
    (𝟏) 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐚 ‘𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞’ 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝
    (𝟐) 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞.

    𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴! 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴! 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴!
    Let me put you out of your misery.
    (𝐚) 𝐈 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭, 𝐢𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲. 𝐎𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. 𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞.
    (𝐛) 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞. Other considerations may come into play, his/her reputation, harm to family, the cost of friendship if discovered.

    For emphasis: The fact that he/she did not bite does not mean that they did not have a price.

    (c) Here is where we differ… We both agree that many folks have very high ideals and would be unwilling to compromise them. But where you see a rock that is steadfast and impregnable, I see is a man/woman whose price has not yet been determined or reached. May the Good Lord give us more of such menand women and keep the temptation at a bearable level.

    I am hoping that you can grasp the nuances in my position. Forgive me if I choose to make this my final statement as I grow tired. If the stone roll backs down the hill, I will leave it alone.

    🙂 Answer: 1623
    Question: The last year a Bajan woman admit she was wrong. 🙂
    Smile a little. Don’t go off on a new tangent.


  13. Dear blogmaster
    My 2/2 is missing.
    Thanks for the help ingetting it posted


  14. @The OG October 3, 2024 at 2:15 pm “I thank the Good Lord that I was spared Cuhdear ‘flying in” (on a plane of course) and adding her voice to the discussion.”

    Now what you calling my pen name for?

    I here gardening, child minding, listening to music, and chiefly minding my own business, while enjoying the argument between The OG and Donna.


  15. @The OG at 2:15 “𝐖𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞”

    High posts typically come with high pay, and nice, nice perquisites, and maybe a name written on history’s page,

    Not a bad reward for abandoning one’s principles.

  16. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Brojoh
    We simply asked : was there a price in accepting the offer to be a Senator. Watson was doing all those things without being a Senator. Why accept an offer knowing she apparently had no intentions of supporting Thorne.
    The simple truth is that both were opportunistic. We suggest that Thorne wanted to use her public profile and she knew that being a Senator carried some prestige and would lift her profile.
    Opportunism has a price. However, we understand your reasoning

  17. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @SS
    Forget the money.
    The “land and improvements” (otherwise now eye sores) was collateral for the guarantor (GoB), in the unlikely 😛 case of loan default.
    Once default occured the GoB owned the land. But they sold it. Pronto. Problem is, the Auditor General couldn’t find the sale funds in any GoB account?
    Next thing we learn, is the buyer of the land, one Pharliciple Inc, had resold the land to another company.
    Apparently, according to MAMs sidekick Avi Persaud, the matter is “before the Court”. We en’ know which court or when.
    Sooo, who owns the land? That is why not one shite is being done.
    Meanwhile the Bajan taxpayers are out-of-pocket $124M for loan guarantees, plus, $64M never received for the land.
    This is what is called “getting fcuked at both ends”.


  18. This Four Seasons /Clear Waters /Participle CRIME on Barbados has been explained in such detail, especially on BU… and
    the RESPONSIBLE persons named and categorised to such an extent… and
    the LOOT totaled with such accuracy…

    That the FACT that
    -the Barbados Police Service
    -the DPP
    -the AG
    -the Minister in the MoF
    -the PM
    …and even the Auditor General (of late)
    all appear to be COMPLETELY IGNORANT of the criminality

    is the CLEAREST POSSIBLE SIGN of the need for an independent EXTERNAL investigation into the matter by honest professional investigators. It can’t cost as much as White Oak…

    That STEAL housing, HOPEless housing, the BWA, QEH, Transport, CWC, and every major project promised, have followed a VERY SIMILAR path – would attract the attention of normal people… but NOT in Brassbados.

    It is hard to even imagine how anyone can perform in responsible leadership jobs, with such baggage hanging over their heads… No wonder that not a boy or girl can be fired, ..only promoted.

    What a place!!

  19. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    BushTea
    There is a LOT still missing. This is because Clearwater Bay Limited NEVER produced a SINGLE Annual Report.
    CBL was the gatekeeper, for the Barbadian taxpayer.
    We know three things for sure
    1. The FULL amount of loans guaranteed to RESTART the project, were defaulted on. ($120M + $4M)
    2. The project NEVER restarted.
    3. The land received as collateral for the Barbadian taxpayer, was Sold.

    One culprit in all this is the ICIJ. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Those feckers hacked CAIPO, and then placed that hacked info in the public domain. This could never have been anticipated by the brains behind the scheme.

    While some of the proposed payments in the Bill which created CBL as guarantor, were specific, to repay outstanding debts and obligations, primarily of the “developers” (whose lawyer was MAM), large amounts were also directly related to RESTART actions. Since the project never restarted WHERE did those monies go? CBL had to know? They had to approve the loans, which they were guaranteeing.

    Further CBL became the owner of the collateral lands. They Sold the lands WITHOUT receiving payment? Who the RH does that.

    Thanks to ICIJ, we know the MoF stacked the CBL Board of Directors with SENIOR persons in the Public Service. (Which BU has covered) We also know CBL was an entity controlled by the Ministry of Finance.
    This is mind boggling. $124M of public funds were spent, $64M is missing/never collected, WE know who the players were, and yet, not a soul has ever been called to account.


  20. @skinner
    Is Every one who seizes an opportunity “opportunistic”? Perhaps. I, for one, will miss her participation in the Senate, she made the senate interesting and relevant to me. So long, to her.

    @David
    Somebody was talking about Clearwater/4 Seasons. Isn’t that an Auditor General special audit? Can’t Thorne’s Public Accounts Committee hold an investigation into that? Or too many politicians implicated in that?


  21. @ David,

    I have been listening to complaints on Brasstacks re BARBADOS WATER AUTHORITY.


  22. “she made the senate interesting and relevant to me. So long, to her.”

    Ralphie the lone DLP LoO has 0 chance of stopping Parliament passing an Act,
    whereas Tricia had the skills necessary to raise issues with the Act in Senate so it gets passed back to Parliament to modify it and try again

    He shot himself in the fambily jewels which must hurt a lot

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading