← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

In the matter of MP Bradshaw, MP’s soliciting money for various ends, including running their own affairs, has been ongoing for years.

The following is one of many food for thought comments to be discovered on Barbados Underground.

In the matter of MP Bradshaw, MP’s soliciting money for various ends, including running their own affairs, has been ongoing for years.

Even a scion of political virtuosity once suggested a Charities Commission, albeit for a different reason
https://www.barbadosadvocate.com/news/inniss-puts-case-charities-commission

MP Hinckson [Hinkson] has had the Clarkson Foundation for some time. And while not a registered charity (donations are not tax deductible) it is incorporated with a Board, and assumingly files annual reports as a corporate entity. And has publicly stated programs it funds.

Every MP should be forced as a condition of employment ( yes they get tax free salaries and benefits) to have a formal mechanism for donations to fund charitable actions. Even if this is giving constituents free hams/food at Xmas or any other holiday.

It is just sound governance.

Northernobserver

The ongoing discussion about a $7,500.00 cheque that was stolen from Deputy Prime Minister Santia Bradshaw’s office has rekindled interest in the lack of transparent the political directorate operates in Little Bimshire.

Bradshaw is correct when she opined that ‘there is nothing unusual about it’ referring to the $7,500.00 cheque issued to her by civil engineering firm Errol Clarke Associates,- purportedly a contribution to a Christmas hamper and food voucher programme in her constituency. If there was not a burglary at Bradshaw’s office, Barbadians would be none the wiser because of the lack of transparency cloaking how politicians and actors in the private sector historically do business.

Bradshaw in her defence stated that Errol Clarke Associates is not currently providing any product or service to the Ministry of Public Works,Transport and Water Resources. ‘Currently’ is an interesting word to use as well as what was not stated. Bradshaw is the Deputy Prime Minister and sits at the right hand of Prime Minister Mottley. It is not a stretch to suggest Bradshaw is in a position to ‘influence’ decisions outside of her area of direct responsibility.  

Who recalls the $75,000.00 cheque that was issued in the name of late Prime Minister Owen Arthur? Here is an extract from a Barbados Underground blog (2008).

Leading up to and during the general election recently concluded, the issuance of a cheque for $75,000 which was payable to the former Prime Minister Owen Arthur and donated by Caribbean Commercial Bank was made a ‘bombshell’ issue by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP). Barbadians were told, and the markings on the paid cheque confirm, that the cheque was deposited to Owen Arthur’s personal account at First Caribbean International Bank in Speightown. The DLP alleges that there is something sinister about the transaction. In response, Arthur explained that he used the funds to support some of his party colleagues who needed financial assistance in their political campaigns. According to Thompson there was no declaration of the donation by Arthur in the 2003 General Election which is required under the Laws of Barbados.

What About The Cheque Prime Minister David Thompson?

There are also numerous blogs posted to Barbados Underground through the years about the late Denis Lowe and contributions received from Peter Allard of Graeme Hall Sanctuary fame to assist his political career. There is no doubt in the mind of the blogmaster members of the political directorate gleefully play in this unregulated space. Yesterday the blogmaster was able to listen to Hal Gollop and former right hand man to late Prime Minister Stuart attempt to obfuscate the matter on the afternoon VOB talk show.

As a civic minded people (we should be) the matter of the stolen cheque can be used to improve REAL oversight of officers holding public office. However, the blogmaster suspects here is another issue that will be soon forgotten, mired in a web of legalese and process.

Lawyers!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

44 responses to “Cheque up!”


  1. Group to lobby for proclamation

    by COLVILLE MOUNSEY

    colvillemounsey@nationnews.com

    ONE FOUNDING MEMBER of Integrity Barbados, a watch group on transparency in public life, is questioning why Government has not proclaimed the Integrity In Public Life Legislation five months after it was passed in Parliament.

    Moreover, immediate past chairman of the group, Andy Armstrong, is stressing that the legislation cannot be allowed to languish like its predecessor, the Prevention Of Corruption Act 2012,

    which was never proclaimed.

    Current chairman of Integrity Barbados, Alicia Archer, said while the organisation was willing to allow for some grace period so that all the mechanisms could be put in place, they would be lobbying early this year for the law’s proclamation.

    Armstrong said: “We are concerned and I know that this is one of our goals for 2024 – to lobby to have it proclaimed. We are very aware that under the previous administration there was an integrity bill that passed through both Houses but was never proclaimed. So that bill died when the Democratic Labour Party were voted out of power but not before languishing for many years. We certainly would want to see this bill proclaimed and an actual Integrity Commission established as soon as possible.

    “This is not unique, it happens quite often in fact. I don’t know why, perhaps it is a case of the Government not putting everything in place to be ready,” he added.

    The issue came to the fore last week after it was revealed in a court case that Deputy Prime Minister Santia Bradshaw received a personal cheque from a business entity for $7 500. Bradshaw subsequently explained that the cheque represented a charitable contribution to her annual Christmas hamper and food voucher programme.

    President of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), Dr Ronnie Yearwood, accused Bradshaw of running afoul of the very Integrity In Public Life legislation, which she piloted in Parliament early last year.

    Section 23 (1) of the legislation states: “A specified person in public life listed in Part I of the Second Schedule who receives a gift worth more than $2 500, or whose spouse or child receives such a gift, shall make a report of that fact to the Commission in the Form 4 set out in the Third Schedule and shall state in the report.” Public officials in breach of this could be fined as much as three times the amount of the value of the gift. Archer, who is an attorney, explained that given the many “moving parts” involved in the legislation, such as the establishment of the Integrity Commission, her organisation was anticipating it would take approximately nine months for all requirements to be in place. However, her concerns centred around the lack of updates to the public since the bill was passed in Parliament. Additionally, Archer called on the Government to begin public education for those within the Public Service who would be caught in the new law.

    “We are concerned that it will take a long time to be proclaimed but we do understand that there are moving parts that must be put in place first. We need to have the Integrity Commission; we need to have the secretariat and the various officers that will be providing support. We did give some grace period because we understand that these things will take time, but during this year we intend to not only push for educational aspects for the people who would be caught by the legislation, but also have this proclaimed as soon as possible,” Archer said.

    She added: “We would, however, like to see some transparency or some reporting to the public as to where in the process we are at. So, it looks like it has been passed and that is as much has been done. We do not have any indication that you have started looking for a chairperson or started consultations with the various parties who have input into the selection of the members of the Commission. The problem here is that there is no communication that anything is being done.”

    Source: Nation


  2. So much for many hands makes work light.


  3. A politician receiving a $7,500 donation to help poor people, is now seen as corruption and compared with Arthur receiving a cheque from CLICO, in his name, for the BLP. Exposed by the same man who, as prime minister, was ‘flying up and down’ the Caribbean aboard CLICO’s private jet. With the amount of scraping, perhaps we should buy a new barrel. Another ‘mountain out of a mole hill, nine day wonder.’


  4. @Artax

    You can do better. The substantive point being made is one of lack of transparency, a deliberate approach how politicians in government do business in Barbados.


  5. David, “lack of transparency” about what? Politicians should now declare the contents of every food hamper they received, and to whom they were given? Or, the amounts of money they received, how the funds were disbursed or to whom they were allocated? Monica Boyce – 6 rolls of toilet paper, 4 sardines, 3 lbs onions etc, and $375 light bill and reconnection fee. In MY opinion, if the donor has been the recipient of contracts issued by government entities under Bradshaw’s portfolio is where attention should be focused. Much ado about nothing.


  6. @Artax, like David said, you can definitely do better. It is either the right way to do business as an elected official or it is not. A minister receives $100,000 as a charitable donation written to him/her in December but has no contract with government so there is no need to declare that gift according to you. Nine months later, an enormous contact is awarded to the same individual/company. How would the declaration of that donation be handled at that time.

    Please do not let Party allegiance cause us to ignore wrong procedures when we see them.


  7. @Artax

    In this case we are discussing a $7500.00 check? However the bigger issue is that the current state of affairs is that there is little transparency when it comes to how politicians do their business. See NO’s comment.


  8. Walter has opened with this matter today.


  9. I agree with David and Fearplay here.

    This manner of doing business is open to corruption.


  10. It seems there is an effort to soften the outrage being expressed by Barbadians over the Santia Bradshaw cheque affair.


  11. Fear Play pun fire

  12. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    The outrage should be real, and harsh.
    They (the elected) know better.
    There must be separation between their charitable endeavours and themselves.

    Collectively (the elected) are the same group who despite a small army of public employees cannot produce Annual financials, for numerous entities. Sorry, they CAN, they just prefer not to. Why? They don’t wish to explain them. Even when they claim to have them, they remain a secret.

    Is JoeQ public that far off, if they extrapolate they run other matters likewise?


  13. It was amazing listening to average Joes interactions with Walter Blackman on today’s talk show. Blogmaster’s favourite was if Santia intended to be dishonorable she wouldn’t have left the cheque at her constituency office. We like it so.


  14. It was amazing listening to average Joes interactions with Walter Blackman on today’s talk show.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Boss
    Why do you continue to PRETEND not to accept the concept of Brass bowlery being endemic bout here…?


  15. What “party allegience?” I’ve expressed my concerns on matters relating to the lack of representation by politicians to their constituents. Such as Neil Rowe refusing to assist people because of their age. When I gave an example of Rowe saying ‘government ain’t hiring old people,’ which the blogmaster defended Rowe. Or, when he defended Corey Lane for not responding promptly to a constituent’s request for assistance. The blogmaster could not present articles to highlight those cases of misrepresentation. But, now since Ronnie O seems to be the editor of BU, I’m supposed to jump on the hipocritical band wagon and fear play, the blogmaster et al to admonish Bradshaw for receiving money to help poor people. And, because I did not, stinking Fear play talking bout party alligiance, meaning I’m supporting the BLP. Look, Fear play and David, kiss wunnuh ass!!! I respect wunnan opinion. Respect mine, even if I don’t respect yours.


  16. That should be, respect my opinion even if I don’t agree with yours.


  17. It appears Dr. Ronnie is fighting back. Let us see if it can be sustained.

    https://videos.files.wordpress.com/jUaw99rD/santia_bradshaw_cheque_issue.mp4


  18. @Artax

    You are reaching. Of course your opinion is respected. The substantive issue remains – as a public we have to demand transparency from government, this has been a challenge. The refusal by either government to efficiently proclaim and operationalize transparency legislation tells the story.


  19. This matter could/should be investigated along official channels following due process to determine if the lady followed due process.

    Corruption in Government in my opinion is more related to the broader war of White scum Governments racial wars which is far bigger and dirtier.

    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/jan/03/claudine-gay-harvard-president-resignation-new-york-times-op-ed


  20. Video is a Bitch

  21. Stop spinning the wicket is for seamers Avatar
    Stop spinning the wicket is for seamers

    Why don’t you also tell of the other Ivy League female boss, UPenn, who quit after being publicly questioned. And she wasn’t accused of plagiarism.


  22. David,

    I believe that the Nation’s headline read something like – Santia CLEARS THE AIR on Cheque.

    “Clears the air” is NOT objective language. It is a “nothing to see here” very subjective judgment. It is manipulation of gullible minds.

    I am not suggesting that anything nefarious occurred. I do not know.

    But my opinion is that there is a better way to do this. It is far too open to corruption.


  23. New name for Ronnie O!

    From now on, I shall call him Mike Tyson.

    That was a first round knock out punch!

    Maximum impact!

    “Oops upside ya head!”

    And bruggadung!

  24. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Of course there are better ways….
    Maybe MP Hinckson, who isn’t on the ‘most favoured’ list any longer, can hold a session for his fellow members?


  25. I am amazed and amused at the stance taken by some reasonable and sensible folks.

    Surely, we can all set the difference between making a check out to charity and making it out to a politician.

    Even, if she was the most honest person in the world, the process the young lady is following is seriously flawed. And if others were doing it before, it is as flawed then as it is now.


  26. Amazing and amusing to watch Sanita take off Ms. Mockley.

    Hero (or is it heroine) worship?


  27. In Barbados it is not uncommon to observe people wearing several hats, Peter Wickham has mastered the art from pollster to pundit and now a politician as per the following:

    “The political scientist also issued a challenge to Yearwood: “I would be keen to see Yearwood take the lead in this regard and disclose publicly the persons or companies funding his campaign, the DLP’s Christmas parties and other recent events, and to go further and indicate if payments”

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2024/01/05/wickham-donation-to-bradshaws-charity-nothing-unusual/oday

  28. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    After reading the BT article yday, I was confused. Seems the term “charity” and ‘charitable work’ are used interchangeably.
    For, IF MP Bradshaw HAS a charity, a separate entity to handle charitable endeavours, why would a contribution intended for charitable work, not be made payable to that entity?

    In the same paper I howled with laughter, as the longest serving director of NISSS (formerly NIS) spoke wearing her union hat, about “transparency and accountability”.


  29. If the cheque was received by her office it supports a crying need to implement an amended office procedure to receive donations. Politicians are happy to be stuck in fear because the majority of Barbadians like it so it have become too apathetic to care.

  30. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Wickhams comments bore similarity to the Innis defence, which wasn’t allowed by that Court, that bribery of influencers in Barbados is standard practice (acceptable?)


  31. Wickham is a talking head for the establishment, in particular the BLP.

  32. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    And Wickham is Bushie’s fav 💜💜
    The BWU Gen Secretary was on about one of@Artax fav topics….work permits, having found no suitable candidates. While hypocritical coming from her, the claim itself has validity.
    I note MP Moore, is still listed on the NISSS Board, as Senator. Surely she isn’t in both Houses?
    In the rush to bury the NIS, it seems the NISSS failed to get a new URL. Also seems none of those past reports “up to 2015” have been made public?
    Dey laffing at we???😀😁


  33. The one everybody is Walton is the rumour that Leslie Haynes is to be the new CJ is true.

    #helpwe

  34. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    In an unrelated issue, I see the former Bajan company, Simpson Oil of the Cayman, is having a spat with Parkland.
    Their nominee Directors (two of the ex PWC types SOil hired) resigned, after joining just last year.
    Usually means a sale/takeover is in the cards.


  35. @ David re new CJ

    is your source nekkid and a departure from usual informants ? lol


  36. @Hants

    The blogmaster did not reference a source. It is a rumour making the rounds on WhatsApp in recent weeks.


  37. According to the PM Santia Bradshaw did not know the cheque was being sent by Errol Clarke Associates.

    Matter shut!


  38. @David
    According to the PM Santia Bradshaw did not know the cheque was being sent by Errol Clarke Associates
    ++++++++
    Didn’t the Minister address this? In her statement did she say the same thing that the PM said?


  39. @Sargeant

    Bigworks spoke.


  40. […] Maybe the blogmaster is being harsh because after 10 minutes of listening to Mottley yesterday there was a temptation to tune out. Is Mottley’s ability to command her audience fading? Yesterday’s delivery to the nation will predictably suck some of the air out of the cheque story. […]


  41. The banker and tech (2)

    MAYBE I GAVE OTHER people ideas about AI (Artificial intelligence) technology. Maybe I did not need to give ideas. Maybe even supermarkets were on the ball and SUNDAY SUN columnist Michelle Russell was way ahead of me in research and observation.

    I wrote about the banks and technology, but I did not know that the banks did not want people to even come into the bank. Have they started by dissuading older folk from even entering the bank?

    You know that old people cannot stand up for a long time. One push or a strong breeze and they depend on a stick.

    They have started with old people. This country is really dysfunctional. You think dysfunction is limited to old people? Maybe it has started with them. Old people used to hobble and go into the bank to deal with the cashier; maybe to lodge excess cash, to withdraw from their account or just to talk to somebody. Being weak in the legs, they will make a note of their position in the line, take a seat and wait until their position is almost at the head of the line for the cashier and then rejoin the line.

    Well there used to be about ten seats available in the lobby. Then a couple of weeks ago the seats were reduced to two. Then the seats disappeared altogether. This was baffling, as old people constitute a large portion of customers. What did this mean? Did it mean that old people were no longer welcomed in the bank? Perhaps this was a message to customers that the bank preferred people to use their services from home or the Automatic Teller Machine. Or, this was a signal that cash transactions were being frowned upon.

    We have been warned that cash is going out of use and in any case it is expensive to handle.

    Does it mean that the banks are about to introduce the type of banking (probably with AI features) for persons inside the bank? But that does not have anything to do with waiting in the bank.

    But Banks, gather their working capital, (savings) from the man in the street, many of whom are old, as well as from the big businesses.

    Banks do not normally provide insurance as part of their business for their borrowing customers since they would be insuring their own risks, be it the risk of death or fire and destruction as well as the innate risk of non-payment of the loans.

    It is, therefore, important that banks value and accommodate their savings customers. This is emphasised by the Central Bank providing a measure of protection for savings customers if the bank gets into difficulties with their borrowing customers.

    Just recently one of the NATION’s editorial reminded us of how limited we are when we cannot use our own money in banks to purchase oil if the seller does not meet the approval of the United States under whose jurisdiction our correspondent banks operate. Our own money that we have borrowed. That is how much our lives are circumscribed. Perhaps we now see what sort of mountain our Prime Minister has set herself to climb. She might be able to shake hands with the biggest and the best but changing the world order is a different kettle of fish. The recent baffling requirement to change our tax system is a fine example of our lowly position.

    In any case, we have to decide whether we shall follow the crowd with our AI aspirations or whether we shall be an anachronism with unknown consequences. We would not be the only country where people are forming a backlash against the rapidly changing world.

    You know that there is no known end to which AI will take us. There is a possibility that AI will have its own ability to think and that we will lose control of its development. Further research in AI may even lead to being able to produce life – remember we have already a sheep.

    The issue raised by Michelle Russell will not go unnoticed especially when Government and the private sector are not working together. We must ask, are the trade unions asleep or enjoying a cushy spot?

    Harry Russell is a banker. Email quijote70 @gmail.com

    Source: Nation

  42. Canary in the mine Avatar
    Canary in the mine

    Dear God, you know I try to be positive but you keep sending these stories my way.

    I try to give folks the benefit of my doubt, but their wicked behavior is unchanging.

    Then, why must I change? Why should I remain silent? Should I speak only when I (myself) am in the grips of evil? Should not my brother change his evil ways? Cannot a honest man prosper?

    Am I an alarmist or am I your canary in the mine? Talk to me. Are these stories your way of talking to me?


  43. The job of fixing roads on the island seems to big for Minister Bradshaw.

    MTW aims to do better

    Minister of Transport and Works (MTW), Santia Bradshaw is assuring the public her ministry is increasing its efforts to finish long standing projects.

    Yesterday, she explained there were many variables which hindered their work.

    “We are in the process of doing continuous assessments to determine the level of resources needed. It is not so much a case of these projects being stalled. We are dealing with staffing and weather issues but we are preparing to get going again. We acknowledge there has been challenges over the years and we are dealing with rectifying them,” she said.

    In a recent release, the ministry promised its aim to improve going forward.

    “The MTW recognises there are incomplete projects across the island and we are seeking to resolve this challenge by actively working on improving efficiency. A review of all works which have remained incomplete for several months or years is ongoing.

    “In addition, senior and middlelevel staff have commenced supervisory management training to help improve project management and the maintenance of infrastructure, which in turn should result in the improved delivery of service to the public.”

    Senior Information Officer Shamkoe Pilé explained that the heavy rainfall last year had further deteriorated the road infrastructure and increased the work load on the various depots but noted they were working on improving the response time. She outlined a few of the projects which they were seeking to complete.

    “The work at Pie Corner Bridge [St Lucy] has recently restarted after a long hiatus, the increased rain is only one of the things that impacted progress there. There is also Walkers in St George . . . work will begin there shortly and we have Wakefield, St John, where work is ongoing,” she said.

    Last week, residents of King’s Village, Holder’s Hill, St James, complained their road was all but washed away some years ago and never repaired. They said work had actually started but Mother Nature forced it to stall.

    “A contractor put down tar and grits and the rain wash it ‘way. I would like them to come back here and do the road properly,” said Michael Dottin, a resident in the area.

    A woman, who declined identification, said the rain destroyed the work the same day it was completed.

    “The road is not good and getting worse every day. A couple years ago it was fixed and later that day, we had that freak flooding and the rain wash everything down the well, it had to get cleared. There are big potholes, one of them caused my CV joint to let go and I had to buy a new pair of tyres,” she said.

    Another resident added: “To tell the truth, I don’t like the state of the road . . . it’s a cart road,” she said.

    In response, the MTW said work in King’s Village was overdue.

    “The Ministry acknowledges that additional roadworks are overdue in another section of Kings Village. Work had commenced in this area a few years ago but there has been a significant delay in completing this section. A team is in the process of conducting an assessment of the area to finalise plans to complete drainage and paving in this section of Kings Village before the end of this financial year.”

    The statement also noted the MTW’s Prospect Depot previously carried out drainage and roadworks in a different section of Kings Village, which was finished in the latter months of last year.

    “At that time, the team dug and installed two stormwater wells to alleviate flooding and paved the road.”

    (CA)

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading