โ† Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Owen said that land must fetch its highest economic price.

Submitted by Observing

Prime Minister Mia Mottley

Back in 2003 Owen Arthur touted the Pierhead Marina Development Plan. For some this was a visionary idea, for others in the years after it was a chance to get out licking. 20 years later a flurry of activity has indicated that investment development on the island’s south-west corridor is back at an all systems go stage

Savvy on the Beach
Not much more that can be said here that hasn’t already been ventilated. It is absolutely clear though that Kinch must go.

Marina shops
These shops were slowly shuttered up over a few years. A recent article with the owner of Marina Restaurant who was locked out in 2020 confirms that it too is time for him to go. Miss Daisy has spoken.

Cavans Lane renters
Though two remaining renters have vowed to fight their “sudden” eviction, they know they are only renting and they will have to go. A public notice has also confirmed that the next four years will see the entire area transformed.


Barbados Defence Force
The PM flew a kite when she hinted that BDF HQ “may” have to move. But, it is clear from the overall plan that it HAS to move. Just a matter of when.

Mrs. Ram
This property was compulsorily acquired and continues to be a battle. Hyatt will now take its place. Like it or not, this may be the way things are done moving forward.

Geriatric Hospital
This staple on Beckles Road will soon be no more, in an effort to replace it a Conference Centre and mixed facility to replace LESC which will soon be entirely in the hands of someone other than “us.”

Beckles Hill residents
These folk have been informed that they will be moved “soon.” The long promised town hall to discuss it has not yet materialised but, with construction in Waterford already started it’s only a matter of time. Their space is needed.

Now for clarity, this is not intended to be a criticism (that’s for you Artax). Instead it hopefully serves to highlight and connect some dots. Development is good when done well. It can bring much needed investment, employment and economic activity. The investment plan for the entire stretch of town to Harts Gap is unbelievably ambitious and will change that entire landscape in MAJOR way. But some features of progress should always merit attention

1. The lack of open communication with the public and potentially impacted stakeholders about the overall plan

2. The need for thoughtful consideration or involvement of persons who made this stretch their homes, their workspaces and their own investment.

3. The usual concerns raised about “how” and “by who” these projects are being done

4. Ongoing debate about a Government’s right to acquire any property it deems necessary for “public” purposes (a la Mrs. Ram and others).

Gabby sang “that beach is mine,” at the end of the day we would like to think that Barbados belongs to all of us.

Owen said that land must fetch its highest economic price. Agreed or not, this mantra resulted in alot of people being left without a piece of the rock..

David [Thompson] said it’s more than an economy, it’s a society. But, we must ask in 2023 what type of society do we have? Do we want?

Freundel said…well…nothing much.

Mia has a vision, but let’s hope that alot more persons don’t get left behind, placed on the side or booted out in the name of “visionary progress.”

Link to Investment Opportunities



Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

185 responses to “Development by any means necessary”


  1. You might like this mapping I did for the Trailway in which the 1951 aerial photos are superimposed on Googe Earth and other current digital imagery.

    https://www.barbadostrailway.org/maps/field-names


  2. Nothing confirms the fact that Barbados is a unique repository of idiocy, than this penchant to sell our VERY LIMITED land to foreigners – mostly for laundered money of questionable origin, and ALWAYS our best lands.
    Only a complete, mindless brass bowl would sell the inheritance of his children and grand children to people whose fore parents – for four centuries, terrorized OUR OWN fore parents on these same damn lands….

    NO SANE person could make this shit up…..

    Dr Trevor Shepherd in todays Nation demonstrates that a (very) few of us have eyes that can see.
    Big joke is … Most of those LARGE countries restricts sale of land to foreigners…. wonder why..?!!!

    While it is not surprising that the albino-centric land speculators among us have been pursuing their goal of selling our land to white foreigners, while at the same time, selling our businesses to the same suspects. The REAL SHAME has been the political representatives of the mindless brass bowls who have jumped onto the band wagon of Judases…. generally with pieces of silver in mind…

    Having borrowed her way into serfdom, poor auntie Mia is now just a global mouthpiece of the great Satan (called IMF/World Bank/WHO) who will be used to push THEIR agenda on the world stage, while selling out local brass bowls on the home front…

    Barbados – the โ€˜Radical’ experience of returning to slavery


  3. @Bush Tea

    You operated in this space back in OSA days when land on the West Coast was a big topic. Before the existence of BU back in Billie Miller and Henry Forde time there was a debate about the merit to introducing Alien Land Holding legislation. The consensus was, it would negatively impact our economy because of heavy reliance of FDIs. Ironically Billie Miller – a BLP Elder – in her twilight years finds a reason to loiter around government as a consultant.

    Somethings never change.


  4. Observing, the remark you directed to me specifically, re “this is not a criticism,” is a essentially a sly, vicious insinuation that I am a BLP supporter who becomes offended whenever you criticise the current BLP administration. However, I prefer to use fairness, reason and balance as my guide before criticising. Whereas you, on the other hand, rely on ‘manipulating the truth,’ innuendo and “any means necessary.” It all goes back to ‘when the playing field was level,’ you promised to critique two documents, but found all types of excuses not critique that from the organisation you favour.


  5. Bush Tea

    It is all about money laundering and who has money to launder!!

    Colour is irrelevant.


  6. @ David

    You will not live to see Alien Land Owning Legislation here as we need the FX way too bad to let that happen. I for one am against touching the defence force area as that forms the historic military area of the Garrison. Also when we build all these hotels who we plan to put in them? Airlift is an issue and we struggle to get a decent annual occupancy rate now with the hotel stock we have.


  7. @Artax

    You maybe aware Dr. Kristina Hinds shared recently that a doctoral candidate at UWI completed research going back several election cycles and concluded the majority of promises made in the respect manifestos of BLP/DLP were not kept. One may conclude that it then becomes an academic exercise to debate such.

    Your thoughts?


  8. @John A

    This was told to the blogmaster many years ago, the person at that time referred to it [FDI] as high powered money whatever that means.


  9. โ€œ…the person at that time referred to it [FDI] as high powered money whatever that means.โ€
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    It means that it has POWERFUL BRIBERY IMPACT ON hand-to-mouth politicians who are almost exclusively in position because the have been unsuccessful in other areas of life.

    What a cursed place!!!


  10. @ David

    How many years have we been told the Pierhead project will soon start? If it isn’t 20 years it isn’t one. Then we had the Mrs Ram land bought for $160 dollars a square foot by government to be part of a project, that after years only has a pailing to show as a construction site.

    Then we have land further up the road that the government sold for $31 a square foot on the same beach as the land they paid $160 a square for further north. Not same party but still our government. There is no logic to all of this.


  11. @John A

    To be fair Covid 19 interrupted investor plans. Who can blame them in an uncertain situation that was created?

  12. Breaking news. Election promises not kept Avatar
    Breaking news. Election promises not kept

    ‘and concluded the majority of promises made in the respect manifestos of BLP/DLP were not kept.’

    Do you think doctoral research was needed to reach this conclusion?

    Hush! It explains a lot …


  13. No wonder that Ms. Moore, the General Secretary of the Barbados Workers union has said that some Massas now look like her (Black). We are running like Usain Bolt from the truth and making excuses every day that have become embassingly pathetic.
    We all saw what happened down by the Marina; permission was given to build a bridge that apparently opened up when necessary and traffic comes to a standstill. And yet we continue to basically try to sanitise such brazen deviancy with pretty talk .
    In a very sinister way we have become the enemies of our country and future generations will not and should not forgive us for the wholesale disposal of our country and the ruthless socio economic displacement of those who are the most vulnerable.
    It is pitiful to see how we are squirming as we become more disillusioned.


  14. @ David That beach is one of the last ones with any real development potential and if we go by Owen’s logic must therefore fetch the highest return. I recall Sarah at Savvy saying that Mrs Ram was paid $160 a square foot for land and they were offered $100 sq ft, yet land on that same beach was sold at $31 a square foot a few years back before covid in the boom. Where is the logic and what really is the value for land there?


  15. This morning I stumbled on a page where an elderly lady (81) was complaining that she was no longer able to access the beach.

    Someone in a comment told her that all she had to do was get on a bus (free bus ride) and go to a next beach.

    In a few years, can you see how easy it will be to have all of Barbados going to a single beach after getting off buses?I hope the gate to that single beach is very small.

    The big joke is, some are not even getting thirty pieces of silver.


  16. @John A

    You may recall talk on the 2018 election platform about a former executive at Coca Cola who now resides in Barbados who is investing on that side of town? The recall is fuzzy.

    Everything will be revealed in the light after the highly favoured get what was promised. It is how business is done a la cattlewash. Doesnโ€™t matter who is in seat.


  17. David, I’ve ‘said’ in this forum on several occasions that Neil Rowe told a constituent, who was 54 years old at the time, ‘government ain’t hiring old people.’ Mottley subsequently decided to ‘stop’ paying pension to a ‘handfull’ of retired former National Assistance Board employees, AFTER many of whom would’ve received payments as long as 12 and 17 years. But, Mottley could find money to reward BLP stalwarts, ‘OLD PEOPLE,’ such as Johnnie Cheltleham, who was appointed as president of the senate, and Billie Miller as some shiite called ‘Ambassador at large,’ (“whatever the hell that is,” according to Bushie).


  18. @Artax

    Cappy Greenidge et al. The list is long.


  19. We have telegraphed or desire and desperation for this project for the past 20 years. We start of with a huge handciap
    Plus everyone knows what Butch Stewart got from the last admin, does anyone think bigger investors will take less.
    The fact that we don’t even know their names tells me all I need to know.
    Whatever they want they will get.
    We don’t do business with Indians, deal with them for us.
    Allan isn’t one of us, deal with him for us.
    Knock down everything and then we will talk. This is no guarantee, we just need to see how committed you are.
    You prostituted yourselves for a small fish like Butch, we expect your soul and nothing less


  20. @ Theo

    This Sunday I was on the south coast and came through town to go there. When I passed the government car park before the lights on upper Bay Street, it was ram off with hardly room for a snow cone cart.

    Your point is well represented in areas like this.


  21. David, perhaps you may want to remind me when or where I mentioned anything that would suggest a reference to election promises fullfilled and unfulfilled by both BLP and DLP?


  22. @Artax

    You didnโ€™t, take the comment in the context of ongoing public exchanges about the relevance of political manifestos, covenants of hope or whatever.


  23. What land further up sold at $31/sq ft?

    Surely this is not correct.


  24. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/labour-slaps-down-slavery-reparations-call-as-mp-voices-hopes-of-settlements/ar-AA1gQGoo?ocid=msedgntp&pc=W069&cvid=90c834692336445c94360b0463a3dc98&ei=19

    Barbados ent getting no $$ here!!

    So where is the $$ coming from?

    The amazing thing is all is being done by an unconstitutional parliament.

    There is no opposition!!!

    Any citizen can go to court and end this crap …. if they are really so minded.

    BTW, the Pierhead Project was around since the days of SBG and Kingsland in the late 1980’s.

    The 2,400 acres (including the 1041 acres of Kingsland) which the then Deputy Prime Minister and future Chief Justice were endeavouring to control was a part of an overall project.

    The sources of funding were at that time Canadian, Ukrainian and Chinese and probably others. The collapse of the USSR in that period threw up many billionaires who had $$$$$$$ to launder.

    My bet is today there will be an African component given the billionaires Ms. Mockley has been courting and have been showing up here in recent times.


  25. Is the quotation attributed to OSA accurately reported? I know OSA knew Economics.That statement does not reflect the opinion of OSA. RIP.


  26. @ Conflicted

    $31 bds a square foot is what Kinch paid for the lots of land and the old eye clinic building in Bay Street.


  27. David, public debate about manifestos has been ongoing for several years…… and will continue. But, more importantly, it is the path where some people intentionally want to take and control the narrative, or structure those debates. For example, recall the DLP promised in their 2008 manifesto, to enact integrity and freedom of information legislation within 100 days if they won the elections. They won, and that promise, which remained unfulfilled after 100 days, was the main topic of debate. Recall at that time, Peter Wickham was in the DLP’s ‘bossom,’ and how he used his ‘expertise’ as a political scientist, to control the narrative of the debate by manipulating the facts (a political strategy often used by your friend, ********g), in his attempt to downplay and shift the focus from the 100 day promise. Since then he has ‘changed bossom’ and I’m sure he would employ a similar strategy to convince us otherwise, if that debate resurfaced.


  28. All this expensive development unfortunately will not solve Barbados financial problems. Government officials have consistently promoted TOURISM as the method to put Barbados on a stable financial footing, however this practice has resulted in a continual deterioration of long term finances. It’s a case NOT SEEING THE FOREST FOR THE TREES. TIME to fundamental changes and get of the TOURISM idea will be the savior.


  29. I believe it is a ‘political over-simplification’ of a comment Arthur made about the possibility of relocating the Ministry of Agriculture from Graeme Hall, Christ Church, which was said to be ‘in the heart of the tourism belt,’ so as ‘to allow the land to fetch its highest possible economic value.’ The ‘political strategists and spin doctors’ manipulated those comments to suggest Arthur implied land on the West Coast should be priced out the reach of ordinary Barbadians, and sold to rich white people.


  30. “Barbados โ€“ the โ€˜Radicalโ€™ experience of returning to slavery” said the great Bush Tea.

    For those of you who have forgotten the dark times encountered by our ancestors. Here’s a snapshot of past times or some may say a return of back to the future for Barbados current/future negro population.

    https://youtu.be/SHhYpwO7wIg?t=4648


  31. @Wily
    Nothing is wrong with tourism being the “Saviour” but the government of the day would have to go ALL in with it, and also accept its fickle nature that could wipe out the economy one year “just so”. What options could we explore to help balance/transform the economy that Owen was supposed to since the mid 90’s when things were booming?

    @Artax
    The โ€˜political strategists and spin doctorsโ€™ manipulated those comments to suggest Arthur implied land on the West Coast should be priced out the reach of ordinary Barbadians, and sold to rich white people

    But isn’t that what happened even if it wasn’t said?

    https://www.nationnews.com/2016/06/28/editorial-foreign-investment-is-essential-for-us/

    And by the way, I wasn’t being sly at all. Just proactive.

    @Bushie
    On the ball as usual.

    @William
    “In a very sinister way we have become the enemies of our country and future generations will not and should not forgive us for the wholesale disposal of our country and the ruthless socio economic displacement of those who are the most vulnerable.”

    Unfortunately this snowball has been rolling downhill for years. In another post sometime I will touch on the social side of “progress”

    @David
    Since self sufficiency in a small island state such as ours is an elusive illusion, what’s the solution other than sell sell sell? Just playing Devil’s advocate

    Observing


  32. Here beginneth the real regeneration of Bridgetown. Those of us familiar with the transformative impact of such exercises simply yawn at the nonsense being spouted. Watch muh catspraddling wunna again.๐Ÿคซ


  33. @Observing

    We have created a consumption monster based on our economic model that has to be fed. Based on what is before us we may have to hit a base level to shatter expectation/attitudes.


  34. The problem with tourism is that for every dollar spent on accommodation and other services, probably more than 90% or more ends up outside.

    For agriculture, less than 10% finds its way outside but horror of horrors, the foreign exchange earned is (or was) in the hands of the GOB.

    The owners of the means of production in the tourist “industry” ensure payment is made outside and the GOB has no control of those funds. No way they are going to let the GOB get their grubby hands on it, you think they foolish.

    For the politicians, the only way of getting their cut of the $$$ in the tourist industry is to require planning permissions and extract their cut from the “Foreign Direct Investment”.

    ….. but for a miniscule piece of real estate, there is only so much to sell!!


  35. Our leaders have learnt nothing from Covid.

    We had a tourism dependant economy that collapsed for 2 years thanks to external forces and yet what have we done to diversify the economy?

    When ever little rain fall I still got to buy imported tomatoes and vegetables. All the talk then about taking agriculture seriously, was just talk. Nearly 4 years later and what has changed? All we can hear is talk about more hotels and tourism based operations as our salvation. Don’t mind our average room occupancy currently can’t get pass 60% in summer.


  36. The writing was on the wall from the days of the aristocratic Barrow when he looked outside for new blood to “develop” Barbados.

    Mia, from the start of her premiership, stated emphatically that she was in favour of black Bajans migrating to foreign pastures to earn their keep whilst stating that she wanted an influx of immigrants to increase the population and to bring in new blood. I believe that Mia instructed the President of Guyana to set aside some land for Bajans to work. This was hardly a ringing endorsement for her own black people.

    Barbados measures 166 square miles. One cannot put a price on every square mile of Barbados when land on the island is SCARCE! Especially when one considers that Barbados has become a destination for extreme money laundering.

    When Mia stated that her ambition was to see Barbados become a wealthy country with the highest standard of living she was not referring to the existing population. She was merely stating that her ambition was to build a Barbados around a fresh group of new arrivals. This was code for her meaning she would like to see Barbados majority population disappear in the ether whilst being replaced by incomers with wealth.

    The fact that we are in open negotiations to borrow money from the UAE, a country notorious for money laundering, is indication that our economy will be geared up to support a monied foreign class. We are half way there already.

    In brief: we can wave a goodbye to the negro Bajan; whilst hanging out a welcome sign to a host of foreigners irrespective of there race.


  37. At the risk of being called ‘narrow minded,’ I’m politely asking for an explanation of any intended correlations between the video and Barbados. The topic of slavery reminds us of that brutal, inhumane system and life on planations. I realised that, unlike their foreparents, many of whom did not have other options, several young Barbadians are not too fond of agriculture and plantation work. This could be objectively substantiated by the fact that people from other regional territories, such as SLU and SVG, came to Barbados to work in agriculture and ‘cut cane.’ During the early 2000s, several male Guyanese came here as farmers, while the females concentrated more so on ‘selling meat.’ The island has an extremely high food import bill, which suggests importing produce that could otherwise be grown locally. There continuos complaints about young people unwilling to work in agriculture. Bearing this in mind, would future generations allow themselves to be forced into labour, similarly to our ancestors, or become as enthusiatic as our forefathers to work in agriculture?


  38. We have a view here whose undying commitment is to squeeze every issue raised into some narrow agenda.


  39. A response of ‘political spin,’ which I anticipated. You researched the comment AFTER referencing it, to ask, “but isn’t that what happened [….],” to justify a dishonest attempt to juxtapose the comment with the sale of land. You either conveniently or purposely ignored the 2016/06/28 editorial also mentioned, “…… an emotional argument that was designed to prey on the sentimentality of ordinary Barbadians, for the benefit of people whose primary interests were political.” This is descriptive of your intentions by prefacing your article with Arthur’s comments. Based on variating deliveries, you are a clever bowler with skills that could equal those of Muralitharan, ‘suspect action and all.”


  40. @ David

    Let me ask you a question on what basis should we value land?

    Sounds like a straight forward question but is it really? So let’s say we sell an acre of arable land to a foreign buyer on a brow somewhere on the west coast and he pays $500k USD for it, one can argue assuming all comes through the central bank that Barbados gained $500K USD from that sale. Then what? The man keeps the land puts a house on it and for the next 20 years the island get land tax on the said land probably in Bajan dollars, as someone offers to pay it for him here if he deposits the money outside for the said party.

    What would of happened say if that same 1 acre lot was bought by a bajan for $150k USD and in the next 20 years he generated $650K usd in food production for the island, which sale do you think would benefit Bim the most?

    My point is we seem to be looking at the quick money grab as opposed to the long term benefit to the society on a whole. Land sales to foreigners is a one time gain and that’s it. The same land in agriculture however, is a case of long term continuous yield and foreign exchange protection on the food import bill.

    You remember in Covid when many food shelves had holes in them from shortage of products? Then we had massive price increase due to high freight rates and supply shortages when thinngs reopened, remember that?

    So yes in closing I have to ask what have we learnt from covid regarding food security and the value of land?


  41. @John A

    We are looking at โ€˜a quick money grabโ€™ but what you omitted from your comment is that it is a โ€˜a quick foreign exchange money grabโ€™. Is a foreign dollar equal to a local dollar in real value in the context of Barbados economy?


  42. Something has long been wrong with capitalism. Despite the nonsense by the racist Winston Churchill about democracy being less worst than the rest. For there is no such evidence.

    Yet we persist.

    And regardless to how much our efforts thereunder fail, the pragmatists, the socalled democrats, with a small ‘d’, not for “deckie”, persist.

    OSA was arguably one of the best at making the models, if one is guided that economics is a real science, mek political sense, for him.

    During his regime however, Barbados had some of the highest costing real estate in the world. Higher than Dubai. Higher than Japan.

    That at our centre, under the rubric that the country has to find ways of paying the bills. A mantra which up to this day remains the guiding organizational principle, land was to be sold to the highest bidder, even as deadended as such has been, proven and continues to be.

    We’ve long known that capitalism and democracy cannot coexist. For capitalism is given to the pragmatic, the permanent disposition for the deal, acceptance of the money bag, and the bag men.

    Can a real country be so built in circumstances where, even when you have a constitutional right to own that a Mottley regime could say to otherwise powerless people that they must now load their chattels upon their backs and move to a strange land, not unlike weekend tranfers which happened when one fell out with the plantation owner and which was a feature of Bajan culture until quite recently.

    Like OSA, Mottley knows no hard limits to her social ruthlessness. And still, questions remain in yhe minds of some as to manner of man is she.

    We could go on and on. But if there is to be a social fabric which we sometimes want to exert pretense, catching at the shadow of capitalist bone can only mean surrendering all else in our determination to serve White people’s interests, taste, needs.

    Long gone are pride, industry. Enter, begging and whoring!


  43. @ David

    Good point so let me ask now in response is not a USD saved the same as a USD earned?

    My point is we see the up front gain but do not look at the long term benefit and compare them accordingly.

    So we say Barbados has progressed with high internet availability, free education and health care, relatively good transport system and so on. All undeniable facts I admit. But do you know in the 2nd world war Barbados fed itself when food shipments could not enter? Ask any that lived through that period and they will tell you they had ample food supplies locally grown. My grandfather spoke of it often. Every piece of land be it large or small had something to eat growing on it he would say. Although you had to stuff car tyres with cane trash and grass as no new tyres or tubes were available, people survived LOL. Can we say today if that occured, we could do the same? So what exactly then is progress? Yes we will have all the imported luxuries next time around, but God forbid we don’t have to eat brand name clothes to fight hunger.


  44. @John A

    You have retreated to being philosophical which is not bad mind you.

    The time of which you referred Barbados managed an agrarian system? As you know Adams transitioned to a mixed economy with OSA taking it pretty much to services – fast tracked by the Globalization construct.

    Have we progressed is one of those circular debates that will garner support from both sides.


  45. @ David

    I agree my above comment did contain facts from the past, but it does bring to question what exactly is progress, if as a result the people become more deprived of what is theirs. In other words we can now buy a brand name phone, a beach chair and cooler from China, while packing it with imported drinks, yet we can’t park our new German car close enough to a nice beach to enjoy our foreign items, while wearing our designer swim wear. So tell me what makes sense there?

    We are losing large tracks of land inland to golf courses and other developments, while at the same time losing public beach access to developers, who use the law of accretion to questionably gobble up public beach land when our backs are turned. They then tell us “you can’t put that beach chair and umbrella there no more, dat is private land you got to rent one of we chairs and umbrella now.” Lord we losing all around it seems and just can’t catch a break.


  46. @John A

    We need to agree what we want Barbados to look and feel like. Do we?

    How we want to carve a niche in the world that allows the country to compete and at the same time achieve the first point.


  47. @ David

    Yes that is it. The word is balance. Development must not alienate the local to benefit the foreigner. At the same time the foreigner must not be hindered by the local either.

    Just recently we had the blockage of a road by Edge Water in St Joseph, the Savvy Issue, then there was the blocking of beach access opposite the old Coach House a few years back and on I could go. I saw a picture a friend of mine took from the sea of Carlisle Bay in late January or early February this year, all you could see was bright umbrellas and beach chairs, with small openings between the clusters. I mean do we need more of that down there? There has to be balance in Development so that both locals and visitors feel welcome. If this is not done then animosity arises between the property owners and the locals, with the visitors smack in the middle.


  48. I am amazed that a meeting that was intended for the diaspora did not have a link to the public event. I made every effort to get a link but it appears (if there was one) that I do not have the right connections.

    And, if there was not one, then this would suggest that Mia vision of the diaspora is limited to those in the same room as her when she is overseas.

    Indeed! Things are suspect, when a person whose first loves are a microphone and a camera would not use this great opportunity to spread widely spread her message.

    At this time, the way Mia handled the Mackie Holder issue does him no favor. She has opened this up for further speculation.

    Those of us who were contented to give him the benefit of the doubt must now wonder if this move was requested by New York officials.

    Are Mackie’s days numbered? Was this a move to first save face for him, followed by a hard cold boot a few months later.

    We wait and see.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading