Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
@ dpD
You ‘said’ “there is no mistake and it’s crystal clear as it can be” Justice Chandler is “in charge of the judicial management.”
I disagree.
I’m not a lawyer either. I do not understand the logical basis of your argument, which I believe is flawed for several reasons.
Applications to the High Court by the Judicial Manager were also heard and ruled upon by Justice Sandra Mason and Justice Pamela Beckles.
So, according to your logic, then, both those Justices were in charge of the judicial management as well?
It is “crystal clear” the COURT “is in charge.” It’s just a matter of who is the presiding Judge at the time.
Additionally, since you’re versed in “technicalities,” are you suggesting CIL (under judicial management) had to seek permission from the Court to make a complaint to the police regarding the alleged theft of $3M…… bearing in mind this is an internal issue and the JM was responsible for the ‘day-to-day operations of the company?
“Chairman of the NIS and a former director of CLICO Holdings Limited who served with Leroy Parris,”
There was a lawsuit filed against the whole gaggle of them…think it was in the amount/region of 160 million dollars claimed over the Clico scam…that case will probably be called in the next 30 or 40 years when evabody dead or drooling into bibs..lol
@Artax, you are too intelligent to be so ‘pedantic’ -dare I say – as above.😎
Obviously and clearly YES, YES re “… then, both those Justices were in charge of the judicial management as well? [and] … It is “crystal clear” the COURT “is in charge.” It’s just a matter of who is the presiding Judge at the time.”
The issue is that it was a COURT matter and therefore final decision making was under their jurisdiction … that is the fundamental point which the attorney is making.
And of course neither of us are trained in all aspects of law but one can read and understand the law regardless of spending years as a student… Nor am I “versed in ‘technicalities’” 😎🥳 just applying experience and common-sense
… so NO … obviously no one needs to “seek permission from the Court to make a complaint to the police regarding [any] alleged theft”
… however, in matters of this type which are under court direction unless there is an imminent and or immediate threat to human life by the alleged illegality surely any JM would generally have to report findings to the court prior to submitting a police complaint….
So sir the issue is not about SEEKING permission to report a possible crime but simply what the legal rules of the JM process stipulate.
As a certified accountant you know more of those stipulations than I, good sir…. so let’s cut the ‘semantics’.
Gollop’s remarks were perfectly in line …they may have been just sweet phrasing to butter his client’s situation but were perfectly legal artful phrasing, nonetheless.
I gone.
“You will own nothing and be happy”
So you see John…we can probably treat the last 100 years as the test run with black faces tiefing everything for themselves, and their sidekick partners in crime, leaving the population barely surviving.
….just because the vote beggars were in a position to exploit, oppress and disenfranchise, depriving mostly the majority population of everything…setting the stage for what is likely to occur shortly.
An already tested theory.
@Dee Word
Talk about all the technicalities we want, Parris will loose in the court of public opinion given the demise of CLICO Barbados, losses incurred by investors/policyholders. We do not have to rehash but there is clear evidence of a questionable governance framework, one the regulator was ineffective in addressing. We have to build an equitable system.
@Bush Tea
You have a good memory. This is a matter to be found in the BU Archive. Not many issues are left untouched but what is the point sometimes we have to ask.
Does BIPA even exist anymore?
Good question!!!
Here is another one!!
How many of its members have died waiting on our court to resolve the issue?
100, 1,000, 10,000?
UK in trouble.
Cannot understand why people would risk their lives to get there crossing the channel.
Boss…
Actually Bushie has a poor memory,
but an EXCELLENT nose….
It can smell shiite and rot for miles…
ALSO, Bushie KNOWS (for a fact) that;
WHAT A MAN SOWS – THAT ALSO shall his donkey reap.
This is one of those cases that smell to high heaven of rot…. and Bushie is just waiting to observe the inevitable HARVEST…
..for ALL of the f$#k&%s involved.
The Big Boss DON’T sleep….
His patience is amazing… AS IS HIS JUSTICE.
@Bush Tea
She was a very nice quiet unassuming woman.
May she rest in peace
Why do wunna fellas argue with Dribbles nah??!!
The Dribbler is an excellent example of what Judas represented in biblical terms.
I.e. a chap that had all the qualities needed to make it as a disciple, but who was so ingrained in the worldly (albino-centric) philosophies of life, that he was able to convince himself that the original Bushman was here to facilitate his materialistic fantasies.
He therefore sought to ‘facilitate’ the process by betraying the master, with the expectation that this would lead to the kind of change that HE envisioned.
In ACTUAL fact, the master’s objective is so spiritually advanced that the only term that can be used to explain Judas’ thinking is … lukewarm.
One should either wax HOT or COLD, lukewarm gets spat out at an early stage in the argument.
At least the COLD waxers (those focused on the here and now and on the materialistic) have no real long-term expectations beyond their ‘three score and ten’ and appear to be content with that.
The HOT waxers understand that the ‘three score and ten’ is nothing but a period of learning and preparation for a timeless experience, and they bring a completely different perspective.
‘Lukewarm’ seeks to bring the two philosophies together… which is impossible – and it deserves to be spat out.
Dribbles need to pick a side and keep his donkey off the fence in between, least he get his nuts squeezed badly…
Of course he can also do like Bushie and JUMP from one side to the other – depending on how sweet the debate is….
LOL
John…many are happy to see the dangerously corrupt in their current positions. With everything they so RICHLY DESERVE…heading in their direction like a laser beam…they all need cutting down to their real size..
John?????
Maybe it’s time for security.
“BARBADOS
In defamation Suit CV 595 of 2020 Sir David Anthony Cathcart Simmons v Maria Jane Goddard:-
I take umbrage at the terrifying, rude and disrespectful way I have been treated by Mr. Leslie Haynes, King’s Counsel in the Barbados court while representing Sir David Simmons at the scheduled Zoom proceedings which took place on March 22, 2023 at 10.30 am, with full co-operation from Judge William Chandler.
The serious threats that an order for contempt was being sought to have me committed to prison and he, Mr. Haynes, saying “I hope when the prison van is carrying her up the road, I don’t hear all sorts of wailing and bawling and everything while she is going up the road” has upset me terribly. I was in the first available plane seat out of Barbados on March 24, 2023.
I fear for my life and safety if I return to Barbados and believe an immediate apology is due to me by both Senior Counsel Mr. Leslie Haynes, King’s Counsel and His Lordship Judge William Chandler for the horrible treatment which has been meted out to me.
An application for leave to appeal has been filed.”
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.