Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Heather Cole

General Elections were held in Barbados on January 19th, 2022, and the ruling Administration the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) came away with a resounding victory capturing all 30 seats, leaving all the other opposition parties with zero. Today, 14 days after, now that the dust has settled, it is clear that despite this achievement, the government of Barbados is fighting for power.

The fight relates to the fact that Parliament cannot be seated as the Upper House or the Senate is not constituted. The winning party is like a ship without its rudder as it cannot steer or maneuver at sea. It is in limbo and at the mercy of the waves if caught in a storm. Without Parliament being fully constituted, the administration is unable to amend any law far less create new ones and start its agenda.

Based on the Constitution, two Opposition Senators are required in the make-up of the constituted Senate. Since no members of the opposing parties won any seats, it is left to the President based on the Constitution to act as the Leader of the Opposition and appoint 2 persons who opposed the BLP in the General Election.

The ruling Administration extended an offer to the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) which gained the second most votes to seat two of their Senators. The DLP refused stating that it was not a proper offer since the Prime Minister had no authority to extend the offer. Then the Attorney General walked back on the offer stating that the prime Minister was only seeking to facilitate their entry into Parliament and stating that there must be a meeting with the ruling Administration, the President and the DLP. At writing the DLP has not responded.

Is the Barbados Labour Party in Control?

Clearly the BLP wants to get on with its agenda which perhaps contains vaccine mandates, safe zones, IMF conditionalities and now the contentious issue of seating an 18-year-old in the Senate (even though they had previously opposed seating a 25 year old DLP Senator stating that he was too young). All these are now problematic due to the crisis of there not being a fully constituted Senate. In essence the government is operating in a system that they cannot control the outcome. At present it is powerless except for day-to-day administration. It makes one wonder how long the island can operate without a functioning Parliament. Perhaps there is some pressure based on a commitment to external forces that caused an offer to be extended to the DLP.

Does the Power lie in the Hands of the Democratic Labour Party?

Though it may seem a simple act of benevolence, the offer that was extended to the DLP cannot be construed as such. It was simply to use them to achieve the government’s agenda as the DLP simply will not have the numbers to halt any amendment or passing of a bill into law.

It is significant to note that accepting that offer would also set a precedent to exclude smaller parties from the House of Assembly at this time since they may not be the holder of the second highest tally of votes.

However, it is not only the DLP that has the power of choice; all the opposition parties and independent persons who took part in the General Elections have the same power of choice in deciding whether to accept an offer from the President simply because the Constitution does not recognize political parties, only people. If the opposition parties and independents signed an agreement to reject any such offer, the ship is rendered helpless, forced out to sea, or slammed into the rocks by the mighty waves. Clearly, the back of this Administration is against the wall.

Just selecting two Senators will not resolve this constitutional crisis. It is like prolonging agony not just kicking the ball down the road for someone else to correct later.

The System

The system controlled and manipulated Electoral and Boundaries Commission (EBC) based its decision to disenfranchise thousands of Barbadians and blamed it on the State of Emergency Protocols. This is unacceptable as the protocols were easily amended to suit tourists and celebrations for the Republic. It must be noted that the EBC did not disenfranchise its workers, some of whom must have been infected and spreaders of the virus because a few days later it had to close its office.

When the Attorney General lashed out at the DLP to stop playing politics, it came to light that he did not realize that the fight is not against them but against the voracious beast of a system whose actions his own party has taken to a whole new level by paying social media influencers from the public purse, by obtaining campaign funds from local and international financers as well as maintaining a Department of Communications while the Government Information Service still exists.

The system has now taken on a life of its own and as the song by Jah Cure says, “Babylon can’t feed this beast” and there is no mechanism in place to control it. The system is now working in overdrive to maintain the 2 Barbadoses’. One with the rich man in his castle and the poor man destined to remain at his gate. One in which the tourist sees a paradise and the workers go home to pull back the curtain to show the stark reality of their lives. One in which economic enfranchisement will never be given to the poor. The Poverty Alleviation Fund remains empty, yet government can hold a lavish celebration for a meaningless Republic. The system has made sure that justice is not for the poor. That poor black men are paraded like animals and incarcerated for a spliff like the inhumane conditions of slavery.

From independence, the system has made a mockery of the franchise with use of bribery through giving corn beef and biscuits to the gullible in exchange for their votes. The bribery has not stopped, the vote is now exchange for far more valuable items.

The system has also turned political campaign meetings into lavish parties with big stages and sound systems and bright lights to entice the youth to have a grand time as they listen to popular artistes. Those feel-good moments lead to a five-year sentence of hardship including lack of representation, high prices of food, constant increases in the cost of gasoline, lack of infrastructural development, lack of opportunities, no jobs and the desires for a better life come to naught.

The privileged few can escape the island for supposedly greener pastures, but the majority have no choice but to remain and face this hard brutish existence, yet they revere politicians more than themselves. The cycle of economic poverty for the lower class is perpetrated by political parties. They pay back their campaign financers with big contracts and titles, but they only provide scraps and promises to the people who elected them.

The actions of this system, expressed in the words of Bob Marley is “Babylon system is a vampire, sucking the blood of the sufferers.” The pervasive corrupt practices that start by ensuring that a party dominates the first pass the post Westminster System has been to the detriment of the social and economic life of ordinary Barbadians.

We must kill this beast. It has outlived its usefulness. But perhaps, the system is turning on itself, decaying from within, just like the Roman Empire and we can no longer choose to ignore this fact. On two consecutive occasions it has produced a winner without power. On the first occasion Mr. Joseph Atherley crossed the floor from the BLP, became the leader of the Opposition and formed his own party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). Mr. Atherley’s crossing the floor of the House of Assembly was not a solution, it was just respite. The administration ignored this, and the situation has presented itself again.

What decisions will the President of the Republic make?

The President’s authority rests in the Constitution. She can extend an offer to any of the candidates who took part in the General Election to oppose the government since the Constitution does not recognize political parties. However, if she does this the system remains unchallenged. The Senators will be unable to halt the amendment or passage of any legislation which they deem unsuitable or in the best interest of Barbadians.

The question one must ask is if the President can challenge the system by not siding with the BLP or the Opposition and if she can send the electorate back to the polls. The grounds for this being that the General Election held on January 19th, 2022, was neither free nor fair. The following must occur if the President has the authority and chooses to send the electorate back to the polls.

  1. A suitable time frame must be provided that allows the Electoral and Boundaries Commission (EBC) to get its act together to ensure that persons are not disenfranchised.
  2. Provisions be made for persons in isolation and quarantine to vote.
  3. Options be provided for voting such as by mail or online or other means to facilitate those who do not wish to attend a polling station during the pandemic.

In addition, a Referendum be held at the time of the General Elections to implement the Proportional Representation System in the House of Assembly as the best solution to the current constitutional crisis. One may ask, why such a system? The answer is that it will truly allow representation for all the votes cast by the people of Barbados, it allows for inclusion of all political parties and Independents in the Parliament if they meet a certain threshold of votes (1%).

Senators must also be elected. It should not be a privilege to sit in the Senate, it must be a right by achievement.

We also need a monitoring system enacted into law that prevents wealthy campaign financers from determining what happens and what will never happen in Barbados.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

824 responses to “Who Will Win The Fight For Power?”


  1. Is that the point Nicholls made regarding dissolution?


  2. @ David,

    The DLP has 3 to 5 years to prepare for the net elections and in the meantime can be the ” opposition ” using social media.

    They can mobilize their supporters in the Diaspora to help.


  3. Black Gospel sounds like the Blues

    Help Me Jesus


  4. @Hants

    The DLP is free to go for it. Wish them well?


  5. The window of opportunity to use social media is during election campaigns,
    but when your party loses you should stop wasting time and move on

  6. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, the point he was making was very difficult for me to wrap logic around.

    I actually agree with HIS position but some of the logic he uses to get there is unimpressive. Patterson, on the other hand was extremely lucid although I don’t agree with his legal opinion.

    Is the dicta of the constitution doc turgid … YES. …. However, the life of Parliament is limited … and u cannot carry over one to the other in the way Nicholls seems to be arguing.

    But it also seems ill conceived to me that … 21 senators are absolutely required to constitute as Patterson argues … the framers most clearly had some reason for the original number but shall does not mean that 18 can’t work.

    If 21 was that crucial to originate the chamber then as Nicholls more practically argued words to the effect of ‘at the first sitting’ or similar would have been used….. moreover, why just 8 to conduct business and yet have this ‘massive’ 21 as a mandatory target.

    Yes … the damn thing is rigid where it should be crystal clear.

    Lata.


  7. DavidFebruary 6, 2022 12:17 PM

    It is an interesting day when leading lawyers et al on island are split on the interpretation of the Barbados Constitution.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Three sides to a story, D, B and the truth!!

    … and lawyers are not needed to interpret plain language.

    Have you ever heard about a lawyer having to interpret the Bible?


  8. The constitution is not written in latin!!


  9. @Dee Word

    Agree both interpretations require careful analysis. Nicholls seemed to have stated that a parliament does not in a literal sense cease to exist at dissolution. Will have to listen to the recorded to be as lucid as Patterson was to you in his interpretation LOL.


  10. He also seemed to have said that it appears the president is unwilling to exercise her discretion to appoint two opposition senators in the absence of a LoO and therefore the standing requirement of a quorum applies to get the alternation to the constitution completed.


  11. DavidFebruary 6, 2022 1:29 PM

    He also seemed to have said that it appears the president is unwilling to exercise her discretion to appoint two opposition senators in the absence of a LoO and therefore the standing requirement of a quorum applies to get the alternation to the constitution completed.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Without a LoO the lower house can’t function nor can the upper house.

    How are they going to change the constitution?


  12. The DLP sitting down laughing!!

    Me too!!

  13. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @David, yes re “Nicholls seemed to have stated that a parliament does not in a literal sense cease to exist at dissolution.”

    I also got that interpretation from his remarks and respectfully to the accomplished attorney but that is a nonsense or an absurdity as he said to other such incomprehensible reasoning.

    Without quoting chapter and verse the constitution CLEARLY limits thr life of Parliament and therein who and what can be transacted legally from one body to the other. His reasoning simply dismisses that clear legal path so I was lost at what he really was getting to.

    And yes also to ur 2nd point… I also interpreted him to be suggesting that… although he clarified when that very eloquent caller took him to task on that point. He clarified that he wasn’t questioning her will or lack thereof…

    But u are right another listen is needed… some of chatter was also too ‘turgid’. …. Folks at his level on such a talk programs need to be crisp, clear and as uneqivocal as possible

    BTW the point that the President is becoming embroiled in political bother by having to appoint the oppos senators is also a bit ridiculous.

    The law gives her that discretion or as was stated ‘the duty’ to act to choose 2 people deemed as opponents to the govt. She can choose whom she wants from D, S or wherever without sinking into political mess.


  14. @ John February 6, 2022 11:58 AM
    (Quote):
    The problem is that there has been no parliament since Froon and the GG dissolved it in 2018 so people want to have their voices heard on social media.
    (Unquote).
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Sir John, how can you stand by that statement knowing full well there was a LoO in the HOA and two senators recommended by him to sit in the Senate in opposition to the Executive?

    Please, stop misleading the blog!

    Weren’t the basic Constitutional requirements quickly put in place for a parliamentary democracy to exist after the Red Bishop decided to play the part of a political Judas in order to provide a solution to the conundrum which has repeated itself in 2022?

    What ought to be of major concern is how the HoA can practise the ‘copied’ traditions and mores of a Westminster style parliamentary democracy without a LoO.

    However, with your god all things are possible.
    If MAM can announce the president and his deputy of the Senate long before it had time to form fully or even come into being in order to elect both of them, in clear and specific accordance with the Supreme Law of the republic, then she is quite capable of working miracles in the Lower House by turning a deputy Speaker into a LoO.


  15. @Dee Word

    The political culture and unprecedented nature of what the 30-0 result has caused gives context to Nicholls political reference to the president.


  16. MillerFebruary 6, 2022 2:01 PM

    Sir John, how can you stand by that statement knowing full well there was a LoO in the HOA and two senators recommended by him to sit in the Senate in opposition to the Executive?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Easy, because I can read and understand plain English!!


  17. Our Supreme Leader will have her reasons for wanting two DLP hacks in the Senate. Surely, she has in mind not the promotion of the DLP but its absolute destruction, subjugation and disenfranchisement.

    Our Supreme Leader should set an ultimatum for the DLP by Monday night: either accept the seats or compulsorily dissolve the DLP.


  18. Coup d’état “blow of state”
    Burkina Faso restores constitution, names coup leader president
    #BurkinaFaso
    What’s behind the coups in West Africa?


  19. That cross-eyed Narrative Nichollos has presented referencing that Parliament can function in the absence of senators was clearly explained by Patterson to which I am in total agreement
    Nicholls present a half-truth to satisfied his position
    A half-truth.in that what he states only can happen after Parliament is fully constituted and a Senator under certain circumstances has to be absent
    People like Nicholls doesn’t give a dam about country
    It is all about self serving and political interest
    Nicholls better be careful as his integrity is at stake
    As it is lawyers in Barbados has a bad reputation and if Nicholls or any other lawyer dares to mislead or misrepresent what is stated in the Constitution for political or self serving reasons a red flag would be placed across the name


  20. Don’t worry about the dlp.
    The dlp is in the good hands of the Constitution
    Mia can fake her way but those looking from the outside in are reading to stop her mischievous antics


  21. How many senators were appointed the first sitting of the Senate (that included the expert Franklyn) in 2018? Where was Garth and the other experts then? Man wunna really do argue some rubbish. So for example if the President offered the 2 seats and no one accepted, Parliament would remain shut indefinitely? The Estimates draw nigh, how would government function 1 April? That mekkin sense? Y’all too bright. Reminds me of the rightbto bear arms crew in Amurka.🤣🤣


  22. EnuffFebruary 6, 2022 3:52 PM

    How many senators were appointed the first sitting of the Senate (that included the expert Franklyn) in 2018? Where was Garth and the other experts then? Man wunna really do argue some rubbish. So for example if the President offered the 2 seats and no one accepted, Parliament would remain shut indefinitely
    Xxxx
    Yuh talking rubbish
    The President had a poll of other candidates that participated in the election as third parties or independents to choose from
    Get out of here wid you Greogory Nichols nonsense


  23. More smoke and mirrors highlighted by rubbish

    EnuffFebruary 6, 2022 3:52 PM

    How many senators were appointed the first sitting of the Senate (that included the expert Franklyn) in 2018? Where was Garth and the other experts then? Man wunna really do argue some rubbish. So for example if the President offered the 2 seats and no one accepted, Parliament would remain shut indefinitely
    Xxxx
    Yuh talking rubbish
    The President had a pool other candidates that participated in the election as third parties or independents to choose from
    Get out of here wid you Greogory Nichols nonsense


  24. That second dose of 30zerol is making you talk even more gibberish. Alphea Wiggins was certainly not present or yet appointed as she was ineligible. Fact. Blackett may know why he wants to avoid the senate though, it will be hard to defend 2008-2018 and forthcoming reports. The BLP has a formidable line up, we’ll see if the Dems’ heir apparent has depth or is a 1-trick pony. You get up good.


  25. David
    Now seeing your post about Patterson v Nicholls on Brasstacks. I will listen to the recording.


  26. Enuf
    And so.are u with all.yuh so called intelligence
    Simple math in the Constitution yuh dont understand
    But rather listen to..some one who places self interest and political interest before the Constitution
    The dlp.has the best line up.all the tenets and Principles of the Constitution that have the 30-0 braggers spinning like headless chicken
    Go figure
    Seems like wunna won the battle but lost the war
    😆🤣😂😹😆


  27. Barbados
    Election Night
    19 Jan 2022
    Live Count!

    DLP 0
    BLP 0

    DLP 0
    BLP 1

    DLP 0
    BLP 2

    DLP 0
    BLP 3

    DLP 0
    BLP 4

    DLP 0
    BLP 5

    DLP 0
    BLP 6

    DLP 0
    BLP 7

    DLP 0
    BLP 8

    DLP 0
    BLP 9

    DLP 0
    BLP 10

    DLP 0
    BLP 11

    DLP 0
    BLP 12

    DLP 0
    BLP 13

    DLP 0
    BLP 14

    DLP 0
    BLP 15

    DLP 0
    BLP 16

    DLP 0
    BLP 17

    DLP 0
    BLP 18

    DLP 0
    BLP 19

    DLP 0
    BLP 20

    DLP 0
    BLP 21

    DLP 0
    BLP 22

    DLP 0
    BLP 23

    DLP 0
    BLP 24

    DLP 0
    BLP 25

    DLP 0
    BLP 26

    DLP 0
    BLP 27

    DLP 0
    BLP 28

    DLP 0
    BLP 29

    Final Score
    DLP 0
    BLP 30

    Rihanna and Khaleel would have got more votes than DLP if they ran


  28. Not surprised Nicholls did a horrible job on brass tacks defending his rubbish position
    Feat peat sake the man doesn’t understand basic math
    His ego plus his credibility as a Constitutional lawyer has been deflated to a level zero
    Time for his clients to ask him for a refund
    No way can smoke and mirror politics enter a political.ring unprepared with a champion fighter called the Constitution
    Nicholls has been outwitted hands down
    Maybe after today PM can offer him the 2 seats a good deal one man capturing two seats saving govt money
    Surely the Supreme Leader can make this happen with Nicholls advice
    😆🤣😂😹😆


  29. Ac Mr Niccholls ran rings around Mr Patterson and later his sidekick Ms Watson.So much so that Mr Patterson continued to show bad manners by comstantly interupting Mr Niccholls when it was his turn to speak.Althoughr Niccholls allowed him to speakAs enuff stated we fo not know of Mr Patterson as a constitutional lawyer.However these brasstacks moderators continue to give him a free pass to state what is really his opinion.At least today we had a balance with Mr Niccholls.Esrlier some joler claimed the DLP laughing.Tell us what they have to laugh about having suffered two redwashes scarcely winning any boxes fsr less seats.Tells me why they are so angry and if they do not get their house in order it will be 90 to 0 let them laugh at that.I gone.


  30. Lorenzo yuh gone
    Guh long wouldn’t waste my time replying to your rubbish


  31. Check the nightly rates on hotels in the area of Oistins.

    Evahbody happy.

    De $$$$ flowing.

    https://www.expedia.com/Oistins-Friday-Night-Fish-Fry-Oistins.d553248621532873342.Vacation-Attraction


  32. Why didn’t the AG ho on brass tacks to face the fire
    Govt sat back and allowed Nicholls to face the heat
    😂 😆 😆


  33. Learn to pronounce constitution
    Old whats-her-face of the who-what-where-when-how-party is using the
    /kɒnstɪˈtjuːʃ(ə)n/ as a shield to hide her emotional trauma


  34. “Why didn’t the AG ho on brass tacks to face the fire
    Govt sat back and allowed Nicholls to face the heat”

    the Weak ass opposition of Barbados
    think brass tacks
    and social media
    is the Parliament
    How to Pronounce Barbados? (CORRECTLY) – YouTube


  35. “Seems like wunna won the battle but lost the war
    😆🤣😂😹😆”
    says the yardfowl from the wilderness.
    Tek care she doan blow the main fuse.
    30-0 is nothing compared to the licks you taking elsewhere.
    A party in shambles.


  36. Here’s a theory of what could happen in another republic!!

    I heard it before but we just have to wait and see.


  37. There is no opposition in Barbados

    but lets try some what-ifs for fun
    If President of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Verla De Peiza
    had gone into a coalition of opposition for the election
    they may have generated more interest and turnout
    they may have swung more votes
    they may have won a handful of seats
    she may have held her position
    DLP may have maintained credibility


  38. “Here’s a theory of what could happen in another republic!!”

    Nobody cares about Trump or America
    He doesn’t pay taxes
    Bu thought he was a racist cunt
    from the old school of racism
    who says Blacks are animals


  39. (Quote):
    Blackett may know why he wants to avoid the senate though, it will be hard to defend 2008-2018 and forthcoming reports.
    (Unquote).
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    What lying rubbish is that? Why can’t you for once take your pecking red beak out of the mud and try to see the forest from the trees?

    Was there any presence of the DLP in Parliament from June 2018 to December 2021 to defend its 2008-2018 performance?

    How can the absence of any senator representing the DLP affect the upcoming Estimates; or for that matter any Money Bill in Parliament?

    If you guys are looking for a ready-made whipping boy to pin your upcoming problems on then go and make your own with the evidence still stashed in the big red bag and laden with imaginary evidence.

    You and your red colleagues know full well that the laws of Barbados are not designed for the incrimination of ministers or their politically-appointed sidekicks in any allegations of financial infelicities since they are not deemed to be “Accounting Officers.

    What are you going to do then? Charge them under the 1929 legislation as you should have done with Donville?

    Instead of Blackett how about getting Sinckler and Physical Deficit Ince in the Senate to defend the 2008-18 glorious decade?


  40. MillerFebruary 6, 2022 8:00 PM

    How can the absence of any senator representing the DLP affect the upcoming Estimates; or for that matter any Money Bill in Parliament?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    No 21 senators = no senate
    No senate = no parliament
    No parliament = no estimates or money bills!!

    Simplicity itself.

    There has not been a constitutional Parliament in Barbados since 2018 when Froon and the GG dissolved it.!!

    Everything that has happened since 2018 is insurrection against the constitution.

    The Dees have clean hands!!


  41. Miller
    The argument by Garth is that there’s no Parliament unless both houses are constituted. Therefore, even though money bills ie Estimates (the real Budget for the confused on BU) do not need the consent of the Senate it must still be constituted for Parliament to be established according to the QC’s line of argument. So how the RH the lower house would get to debate anything if there’sno parliament? Up to now you or none of your cabal can tell me how many senators were sworn in at the date of the first sitting in 2018.
    “Was there any presence of the DLP in Parliament from June 2018 to December 2021 to defend its 2008-2018 performance?” Duhhh! So dumb! I am tired knocking you out. I am not ac.


  42. The Magic word is BICAMERAL

    “A bicameral system describes a government that has a two-house legislative system, such as the House of Representatives and the Senate that make up the U.S. Congress. The word bicameral is derived from the Latin: “bi” (meaning two) and “camera” (meaning chamber).”


  43. In the US system, every 2 years elections are held and seats vacated or filled in the two houses.

    Neither of the houses is dissolved and never has to be reconstituted.

    Maybe we should consider making the 51 seats of the two houses elective and never dissolve parliament.

    Our foray into Republic Status has been a shambles, poorly thought out and unplanned.

    For the moment however, we need to reconstitute Parliament and the only way seems to be by having fresh elections.


  44. Just because……..


  45. Does anyone know if there are drafting notes on the writing of the Constitution?

  46. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    I am a non-lawyer, not that it matters, because the many lawyers cannot agree.
    The legal constitutional experts always say, any Constitution must be read and interpreted “in toto”. A point Mr. Nichols made.
    There is no opposition in the Lower House. No LoO. It is a currently vacant post?
    Exactly why the PM opted to appoint Mr.KK, instead of reappointing Rawdon Adams (or anybody), and then having them resign at a later date when the constitutional amendments were made to permit Mr.KK, is beyond me.
    That would then, IMO, force the President to appoint two senators, since the LoO is vacant. This act of appointing is not discretionary, what is discretionary, is whom the President selects. And the President is under no requirement to have these choices approved by anyone else.
    The President is free to use her judgement and discretion. That is why the Barbadian taxpayer foots a huge annual bill for the President, staff, building, grounds, expenses etc associated with that office. And why Ossie Moore is not President.
    Further, it would seem appropriate, since there is NO opposition in the Lower House, the choices for the two senators, may well be voices ‘of opposition’.
    In this manner, rather than the PM offering senate seats to the Opposition (DLP?), this approach should have come from the President. After all, it is the President, not the PM, tasked with the appointment of 2 senators in lieu of a recommendation from the LoO.
    Another reminder to all of whether you wish an elected, or an appointed, President; when the “new” Constitution is discussed.


  47. @NO

    It seems the president has not exercised her discretion. There had to be discussion between president and PM.


  48. NorthernObserverFebruary 7, 2022 1:49 AM

    There is no opposition in the Lower House. No LoO. It is a currently vacant post?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    No it is not vacant.

    Since Parliament was dissolved in 2018 it has NEVER been filled so it can’t become vacant.

    Read the definition of how it becomes vacant in para 74(3) below.

    (3) The office of Leader of the Opposition shall become vacant-

    (a) if, after an election of members of the House of Assembly following any dissolution of Parliament and before that
    House first meets thereafter, he is informed by the Governor-General that the Governor-General is about to appoint another person as Leader of the Opposition; – DOES NOT APPLY

    (b) if he ceases to be a member of the House of Assembly for any reason other than a dissolution of Parliament; or -DOES NOT APPLY

    (c) if his appointment is revoked under the provisions of subsection (4). – DOES NOT APPLY

    (4) If, in the judgment of the Governor-General, the Leader of the Opposition no longer is able to command the support of
    a majority of those members of the House of Assembly who do not support the Government, or, as the case may be, the
    support of the largest single group of such members who are prepared to support one leader, the Governor-General may
    revoke the appointment of the Leader of the Opposition. – DOES NOT APPLY!!


  49. What is clear is that for the House of Assembly to meet for the first time, there must be a Leader of the Opposition.

    Simplicity itself.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading