Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The ruling Administration has reneged on its Covenant of Hope where it promised to include Barbadians in governance. Perhaps one of the most frightening examples to date is Barbados becoming a Republic without a Referendum or consultation with the people. This article will focus on the impact on General Elections.

We have all heard it so many times that it has become second nature to state “elections in Barbados are constitutionally due every five years” and since the last general election was held in 2018, it would be expected that the next General Election will be held in 2023. The latter part of the statement is now in doubt.

The admission that the Constitution will come into existence after the Republic has started was brazen. This form of oppression is subtle. It should be the other way around with the Constitution first and the Republic after so that everyone can read and understand what they are getting into.

That admission has changed everything. One does not know how long a time period that will be. Since a date has not been specified, could it be a month, six months, a year, five years? The Prime Minister’s statement was not precise and therefore it cannot be measured. Hence, regardless of political affiliation, every member of the Barbadian public must acknowledge that this is a massive red flag.

There are several requirements to getting a mortgage and once these are met, the purchaser is provided the mortgage agreement and can get legal advice on the contents before signing. It is a legally binding document by which a person agrees to the principle, interest, payments, the terms and the other conditions. If the bank provided you with a piece of paper with just the title Mortgage on it and informed you that this will be the mortgage and asked you to sign without the principle, interest, payments, the terms and the other conditions being declared in writing, would you sign that piece of paper? Added to this you are told by the bank that the actual mortgage document with the written details will be available shortly after, not even on a specific date, would you sign? No one with all their mental faculties working would sign this blank mortgage document as the bank could write after the fact whatever it wishes on the document.

In the scale of things, the Constitution of Barbados is far more significant than a mortgage. It too is a legally binding document that will not only contain the laws that govern a mortgage but every other law that defines all aspects of life in Barbados. So how can the people of Barbados be asked by the government to agree to a change in the status of the State and a new Constitution with a blank document? What will be written on this document after the fact?

Essentially that is what the government is asking the people to do, to agree to a grand show and tell and later find out about the laws that make the new Constitution. It is a buy now pay later concept that is a trap for unsuspecting buyers.

There is no guarantee that elections will be held in 2023 as this is based off the present Constitution. Without a definitive time period of when the proposed Constitution will be ratified into law no one knows when the next General Elections will be. Will the document be laid in Parliament in a month, a year, or two years from the change of status? Only heaven knows.

In addition, one cannot even assume who will be legally responsible for issuing the writ that declares when elections will be held. One does not know if changes will be made to the Electoral and Boundaries Commission, if the matter of campaign finances will be a free for all, if payments to social media influencers will become part of the law.

The action by government to change the status of the island first and the Constitution after the change in status causes one to question the legality of this process. Due process is that the laws come first. What happens in the interim, emergency law or military law?

The matter of when the next General Elections are to be held is not to be taken lightly. There has been no Referendum, no terms of reference, no draft issued on the type of Republic or the contents of the new Constitution. There are just too many unknowns and people wanting to believe what they have no evidence of.

To the electorate, why is this entire process a secret? You are not at a Fair, the Constitution of Barbados should never be part of a lucky dip where after withdrawing your hand from the box you get the surprise of your life! Now is the time to stand up and fight for your rights.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

209 responses to “A Heather Cole Column – When Is the Next General Election?”


  1. A woman held in custody


  2. But look at how Mottley using slick moves to erase Barrow name off the date Barbados became Independent
    Her choice of date speaks to a person’s consumed with legacy and for that she should be condemn
    The small island swamp with leaders who believed they have a divine right of entitlement and power needs to be cleaned

  3. William Skinner Avatar

    @ Angela Cox
    Gonsalves never “ held onto power”; he was always elected via the ballot box.
    By your reasoning , Barrow and Arthur would have deserved to be bloodied by a missile.
    Take it easy.


  4. “That is why I endorse Maicolm X teachings”

    Please don’t taint the legacy of el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz (Malcolm Little) like you do when endorsing the DLP party with your kiss of death tripe and there are many more plethora of black radicals with roots, radics, rockers, reggae lyrics who should not be hijacked for stupid causes by trolls like you they are unnumbered like the stars in the midnight sky of the heavens above every one is a fire that doth shine bright so back off


  5. William SkinnerAugust 6, 2021 11:04 AM

    @ Angela Cox
    Gonsalves never “ held onto power”; he was always elected via the ballot box.
    By your reasoning , Barrow and Arthur would have deserved to be bloodied by a missile.
    Take it easy

    Xxxxx

    That is your opinion

    Take it easy
    Stop placing your way of thinking on what u think or believe I am saying
    Further more I posted my earlier comment on violence and yet u persist on making statement of indicating I endorse violence
    Peace and out


  6. I have again read the comments and none of them say WHAT YOU ARE GONNA DO, …how YOU can make a change…

    Just the same ole same running around in the circles of BLAME.

    Don’t you all get it yet? It’s simple but complex,
    The accountability and responsibility you demand of others must begin with yourselves.

    Barbados is nothing like PARADISE according to all of your own words and yet you LIE to yourselves and tourists. You allow yourselves to be exploited because you too exploit.

    FACE THAT MIRROR IMAGE.

    Scapegoating the youth has backfired on you all. You failed them. Now your grown, HOME BRED, leaders fail you.

    If u can dish it, u can take it.

    Stop crying and CREATE!


  7. What about the violent economic
    policies being inflicted by leaders on the poor people of their countries
    These violent policies are continuous which cause pain and suffering on the backs of especially the poor
    Imagine in the year 2021 leaders have given multiple chances at the voting box to do right by their people
    Yet if one visit some of these small island one would see the kind of poverty that ask questions who is in control
    People still living in houses that have no secure flooring lined with mud
    Yet some feel the Mcguffie pain but not the peoples


  8. Forget Integrity,Transparency and Accountability Legislation ! But remember Haiti !


  9. All these tin horn dictators in these SIDS have no vision
    Clueless on how to manage their economies
    Most of them during COVID reads off and repeats a hand prepared script handed to them by international health organisations
    Meanwhile acting in insensitive manner towards the populace
    Imagine govt acting on behalf of big business and world health organizations making decisions to push their populace backs to the wall and when the citizens reacts
    People ask wuh happen
    Fuh God sake people are not robots that can be made to operate by a click.of a mouse or a push button
    People have feelings which triggers emotions some good emotions and some back emotions
    It is past time that small island govts get their house in order and stop showing torrid disrespect to it’s people


  10. Then yuh have auntie Mia showing absolutely no respect for the Errol Barrow legacy
    She has been in office for three years have not done one dam thing that can place her effort into legacy standard
    However walks around holding on to an entitlement mentality
    Talks about transparency and Accountability and in three years her idea of transparency and Accountability boils down to protocol PR comments
    Moreover so much in a hurry to fast paced her entitlement to having a legacy forgets what she told the whole of Barbados what processes must take place before Barbados becomes a Republic
    This must be a dictator on steroids acting as PM of Barbados


  11. “Yet if one visit some of these small island one would see the kind of poverty that ask questions who is in control. People still living in houses that have no secure flooring lined with mud.”

    Hmmmmmm……..

    Could you please share with BU, the names of “these small islands” you visited in which you saw “people still living in houses that have no secure flooring lined with mud?”


  12. “She has been in office for three years have not done one dam thing that can place her effort into legacy standard”

    DLP will have a window of opportunity to take power in 23 if they don’t fuck it up again like in 18
    and if they don’t talk shit like you 24 7 365
    just keeping it real


  13. We must now be very, very vigilant. First the cowardly attempt on the life of the honourable, brave Prime Minister of St Vincent, today a scandalous editorial in Barbados Today. This newspaper is not ashamed to systematically spread lies about our government and about our people and beloved island, mixed with homophobia, conspiracy theories and more.

    Time to shut down the Barbados Today website!


  14. Time to shut down the Barbados Today website!
    why?
    it is currently the most informative source of news from Barbados


  15. As Cuhdear Bajan suggested weeks ago, and I agreed, the process probably has been hampered by the covid focus. No harm in postponing until it can be properly done. Change is something that should be managed to bring people along. When things are done with haste and without proper engagement, suspicion flourishes.

    This is an opportunity missed to engage, educate and inspire. True leadership! “There is a time when taken at the flood…”

    George Floyd’s murder provided the perfect wave every surfer dreams about. All Mia had to do was ride it!


  16. By the way, where is Cuhdear Bajan?


  17. “George Floyd’s murder provided the perfect wave every surfer dreams about. All Mia had to do was ride it!”

    she said it was a trend and dismissed it, parliament rats never take part in anything that advances a Black cause or empowers the African descended, that’s why i want to know who the hell they think they are inviting minority criminals to our continent and did not think there was going to be some kinda backlash..

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2021/08/05/btcolumn-30-out-of-30-is-not-100-per-cent/


  18. I think becoming a republic is 50 years late, no fanfare or parades are required, just moving on


  19. They also need to be told in no uncertain terms that Africa is not the new ATM for Black/African hating minority criminals and their house negros/partners in crime…..to suck money or resources to maintain corrupt slave societies of the lazy in the Caribbean……..some of us take that as an act of war and ancestral disrespect…

    “Barbados is not the fiefdom of Prime Minister Mia Mottley.

    And while Barbadians remain mute, sedated, comatose, bewitched, apathetic, perhaps petrified, they are ceding this island to someone who from my vantage point, even if not hers, seems more concerned about creating a legacy – contrived as it might be – than anything else. Of course, this is my opinion and I might be wrong. But actions speak louder than words and I wish to be given the opportunity to highlight a few of the things that Barbadians ought to take notice of, as they contemplate the next general election.”


  20. “minority criminals”

    you got to stop repeating “minority criminals”
    as minority and criminals are 2 separate things
    you hate minorities
    you think saying criminals with it will excuse it
    whites stigmatised blacks as criminals so much they believe it
    which is called racism


  21. @ angela cox

    What about the violent economic
    policies being inflicted by leaders on the poor people of their countries

    These LEADERS are born to BAJAN MOTHERS and raised in BAJAN communities…

    Where did they LEARN TO LEAD in such a cruel and inhumane manner??? The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. What kind of HUMAN BEINGS are being created in Barbados???

    TELL THE TRUTH. And shame the devil.

    The ones who lead and the ones who VOTE for their leadership are all EQUALS… no one is SUPERIOR or INFERIOR to the other…

    Again, keep complaining and WAITING AND SEEING, …and you will realize you have no one to blame but yourselves.

    Maybe these leaders are THE MIRROR Errol Barrow was asking you all to look into??? But you REFUSE to see yourself.

    Barbadosed. 😞


  22. “There is no place for violence and personal physical assaults in our CARICOM democracies where the rule of law prevails and rights, including the right to peaceful protests are fully upheld,” Browne said, adding that “all law abiding and well thinking people of CARICOM should join in resolution that such gratuitous violence will not be tolerated in our peaceful societies.

    Here is a man, who like the rest of his Caribbean leaders, governs his country like his personal fiefdom. These people have devalued the life chances of their citizens and have no empathy for their own people. The rule of law is never applicable to our leaders and the wealthy. It only applies to the common man and woman. Now that that one of their own has been targeted they are deeply concerned. They have reason. Covid-19, is the best thing that could have happened to our region. The political deadwood will “inshallah” be pruned or wilt away from our landscape permanently. This will give opportunity for young healthy shoots to prosper.

    I hear what focusbarbados has said. It is government and leaders who set the tone for the development of a country. If they are rotten to the core then what does he/she expect from the masses?

    With reference to Barbados Today, Dr GP is correct. BT is no longer going to constrain itself from writing articles that do not offend our over sensitive leadership. They are going to write the truth and if it offends Tron, then so be it. The time for remaining silent and timid in the face of oppression is over.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2021/08/06/caricom-condemns-attack-on-st-vincent-and-the-grenadines-prime-minister/


  23. “Covid-19, is the best thing that could have happened to our region.”

    amen…if not, it would’ve taken another 50 years to expose the frauds in the Caribbean, using colonial parliaments as their headquarters for crimes committed against the people, their shields and hideouts.

    you notice caricom never condemns the financial, emotional and socially violent attacks on the Black/African populations that has been ongoing for over half century….not one of the vote begging frauds condemn the decades of rapes and violence on Black women..

    a female police officer, who was the security detail for that beast of the Grenadines exposed him and was ridiculed, just like all the other women he allegedly attacked, including the young lady Yuuge Farrelll that they illegally put in an asylum because of some affair with his son..when these savages for corrupt Caribbean leaders commit crimes against the Black citizenry ya hear NO CONDEMNATION…..but all the hypocrites crawl out when the criminals are threatened….the same gonsalves was once persona non grata in Barbados, if i remember correctly he was deported by another unsavory character like himself who was PM at the time…..

    .none of the pretenders at caricom can speak for me or represent me anywhere…they are the worst types of savages to crawl out of slavery….and unworthy.

    Africa will get a blow by blow about all of them, if they think they are slithering their way unto the continent to commit more crimes against African people….newsflash……NOT HAPPENING…they can get that idea outta their heads straight away….liars, thieves and frauds…

    minority criminals is the accurate description for them, the world understands it means a minority of people who are thieves and criminals, not necessarily all white, all indian or all syrian, but a combination……..the continent understood what i meant very well, they are not majority criminals…they have to be properly identified so that they STAND OUT….so suck it up.


  24. I would stop giving gonsalves the attention he is seeking and craving, let him crawl back into his hole..

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2021/08/07/no-violence-allowed-at-protest-organizer/

    “Our goal is to ensure that the Government and the private sector, or the social partners as they call themselves, see the amount of us there are and realize that if we decide that we will boycott and stop buying from them, or stop doing certain things, we can break this economy right down. We are a force to be reckoned.”


  25. As mentioned it is repugnant racism and objectionable to keep saying “minority criminals”
    you are an insignificant nobody who’s online persona is to keep repeating same hateful diatribes continually thousands of times.
    Keep your racism inside your own home with your ignorant family and teach your own children your politics of hate if you want.


  26. says the NOBODY minority polluting the blog….suck it up, they will be called BY THEIR NAME of minority criminals…because that is what they project.


  27. and now the continent knows exactly WHO THEY ARE…


  28. “they will be called BY THEIR NAME of minority criminals…because that is what they project.”
    “and now the continent knows exactly WHO THEY ARE…”

    You overestimate the power of your mad rantings on social media and your influence in Barbados and Africa
    and you will never be able to touchdown in Africa as you are not well, Well Well / Abigail Mitchell / WURA-War-on-U to see if they accept your racism against minorities
    neither will ever be a politician or a political pundit in Barbados when you rant on about slave negroes in power
    Mia has more credibility in her big toe than you have in your entire existence


  29. that must be burning you that you can’t stop it, let alone know WHAT AM DOING…and since i never LIED and DECEIVED a whole country to be elected to anything, used a dead child and his mother…….protected CORRUPT criminal minorities from prison or help them to rob the country billions of dollars while leaving the Black population to suffer, oppressed and in poverty, dying without their birthright inheritances, land, bank account etc, no salaries, pensions, disabilities or severance….you just look and sound helpless AND stupid…

    it must be burning the hell out of that YOU CAN’T STOP ME…..ya can only post wishful shite…and MAY HEAR when i really UNLEASH…ya not even worth pitying…


  30. you just look and sound helpless, BITTER AND stupid…


  31. “that must be burning you that you can’t stop it”
    “it must be burning the hell out of that YOU CAN’T STOP ME…..”

    not burning me at all
    your perpetual crap is always off the mark

    for example you mentioned a TV interview in London Town a million times when you clearly got the wrong end of the stick with misunderstanding

    you are nothing more than a cliche of soundbites that are derived and twisted for your own agenda and polluted by your biased prejudices and mental health issues

    you should seek medical advice immediately


  32. This is tiring and boring.


  33. How many ways can one interpret an interview on ITV that CLEARLY SAYS….the population is mentally enslaved….she did not stutter…she did not speak anything but english with a bajan accent…hard to misinterpret that..if you are going to defend her…at least tell her as she made it public on the world stage…there should be FOLLOWUP..

    but of course no one cares enough to say it..


  34. “….the population is mentally enslaved….”

    which is a basic concept and point to be made about the long term damages and effects of slavery and white supremacy racism that has to be told to the Brits in the time of enlightened awakenings and realisation of truth and discussions that followed the murder of a black man and the worldwide protests

    the crimes to mankind from slavery were bigger and more protracted than the genocide of holocaust against the jewish diaspora although were effectively the same sickness of racism stereotyping scapegoating and blaming of races and minorities of which blacks were victims of but cannot be excused for doing the same


  35. “and effects of slavery and white supremacy racism that has to be told to the Brits in the time of enlightened awakenings and realisation of truth and discussions that followed”

    the brits ARE NOT responsible for keeping the mental enslavement going, it’s the liars in the parliament doing so, upholding the same enslavement system and fighting the people who are trying to tear it down….keeping slave laws and le code noir and 18th torture laws on statute books…..ya have to know who to blame…they manage the island day-to-day….keep the same white supremacy minority rule of criminal mnorities in play…..same vicious thefts of properties, thefts of money, ya need to have a word with Mia….


  36. David bu you correctly stated that the conversation is getting tiring and boring.Yet you continue to let Wsru ala Mrs Mitchell the in my view mad ass bitch to hog every blog topic with her racist crap everyday.Why is that is she related to you?I I had hoped by now she would have gone back to africa and create her own racist blog.How many people on here actually reply to anything she says? This alone should signal to her that few care anything about her or her stale rants.A complete turnoff.


  37. “Aug 03, 2021 · In contrast to Owonibi’s claim that fintech with licences will be able to mint the eNaira, Chuta believes the CBN will be the only one minting the digital currency. A legal claim by the CBN will back up every digital currency minted to keep inflation in check.”

    ah know yall care about this though….BOOOOOM!

    don’t need a fella to care about me…..

    my ship is tight..


  38. BANNED from minting any digital currency in Nigeria..


  39. “the brits ARE NOT responsible for keeping the mental enslavement going, “

    the black Bajan Government are not responsible for the mess that they inherited and have been trying to fix for 50+ years which is due to the Jolly Old British who are laughing all the way to the bank
    slavery is their baby a truly wicked conception
    and the justification of slave code was white supremacy racism
    and likewise colonialism which followed was robbery of world resources for global capitalism which is responsible for third world poverty and wealth inequality by design and their continued efforts to hold these countries down and exploit them in trade.
    These countries are paid pennies and are ripped off and exploited in global markets.

    you may not blame whites and married a white man and have a soft spot for them
    and have a mixed race family and give them whities a bligh and forgive them
    but the mental enslavement is a legacy of their past and their racism that has never stopped
    and can be attributed to white /european brainwashed mindset which abused blacks with violence

    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

    anyhow the point I was making about your sick repeated “minority criminals” trope is :

    criminals are individuals
    whole minorities are not judged in court
    whole races are not criminals
    the entire black majority or entire non black minority are not criminal
    truth is criminals come in all shades of colours and there are criminals in every country of the world and in every prison


  40. Ya still don’t get it…MIA AND HER VOTE BEGGING GANG IN THE PARLIAMENT are RESPONSIBLE for the legislature and all the slave laws, codes and 1800s torture laws STILL on the books and can REMOVE THEM AT ANY TIME…..they are responsible for LOCKING UP the criminal minorities when they break international law and practice racism against the BLACK MAJORITY…they are responsible for locking up the criminal minorities when they TIEF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the economy, they have the Black taxpayer PAID armed forces complete with military at their disposal to stop these crimes against the people….but instead use these same forces against the people….

    THEY HAVE ALWAYS LIED and said they are self-governing and they are this and that from 1966….SO WHY ARE INTERNATIONAL LAWS still being broken regarding the HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE BLACK MAJORITY……


  41. Just because you repeat the same post on every thread on every topic does not make it true and you are missing and deluded, it is just a half baked thought and a figment of your mind.

    Slave Laws have been archived already. Barbados problem is third world ghetto problems where there is a very rich and very poor.

    It’s Big Business stems from legacy of British Companies which never changed even when the British Government stopped ruling.

    Minorities may have set up businesses and become successful but that is how Business works.

    All nationalities have criminal gangs, UK has every country in the world having small communities living there and every country and community has it’s own criminal gangs with their own specialities.


  42. Maybe the solution on the best way to proceed to fix the problems of the poor communities, is to have someone from the poor communities run for power, so they can prioritise projects for helping the poor communities and if they win the votes of poor people and gain seats and / or win election they can work towards levelling up the communities. Although country is broke / bankrupt money is about choices and can be diverted from other spending and even a little expenditure for development can go far.


  43. “Minorities may have set up businesses and become successful but that is how Business works.”

    talking shite….CRIMINAL MINORITIES in Barbados ARE THIEVES…they work for NOTHING, they earn nothing HONESTLY….they won’t know how to without some Black person giving them information or helping them along……

    they only know how to survive by exploiting the Black population….garbage in, basura out..

    where ya think the frauds in the parliament came from, they all crawled out of slavery and came from ghetto life then pretending that they are elite and got pedigree…it’s a DISEASE OF THE MIND that once elected the first thing they do is pretend they are better than those who elect them and SELL OUT…..be CORRUPT….and turn into deadly forked tongue snakes..

    ..it’s a system they DID NOT CREATE and would not know how to use it to the advantage of the Black/African population who elect them, they are too ignorant, backward, greedy and love to show off…….that’s why they tried their hardest recently to impress minority THIEVES by attempting to sell out the people’s African birthright like if they own a continent, have some right, can give away WHAT DOES NOT BELONG TO THEM and got EXPOSED from the west to the east…..and DID NOT KNOW what is REALLY GOING ON or who is patiently waiting for them re the IDENTIFICATION of all the criminals in the parliaments in the Caribbean who live to BETRAY THEIR PEOPLE, and keep them in captivity in the west with no freedom to advance or become empowered……..

    ya dealing with nasty niga, so no better can ever be expected…but they got short memory syndrome just like their yardfowl/Slaves and will try to sell out OUR continent again…..because that’s all they know..

    it will take minds with ethics, morals and a drive to WANT see their Black brothers and sisters excel and get wealthy, you will NOT EVER get any of that from DBLP..


  44. Scholars: Republic way to go
    By Tony Best
    Bajan scholars in North America, who between them have written at least 20 books and dozens of published scholarly papers on a range of social issues, are backing the march to republican status.
    Four of them interviewed by the Sunday Sun in Canada and the United States described the republican issue in Barbados as a settled matter. The scholars, who have collectively earned at least a dozen graduate degrees from accredited universities, also teach hundreds of students at different schools.
    Dr Cecil Foster, a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo, Dr Andy Knight, professor of international relations at the University of Alberta in Edmonton and a highly respected international relations expert; Dr Myrna Lashley, recently elevated to the rank of an associate psychology professor at McGill University in Montreal; and Dr Rinaldo Walcott, professor of Africana studies at the University of Toronto, have all said the facts and logic of the proposed constitutional change in Barbados, moving from a monarchy to a Commonwealth republic, were quite clear.
    Holding a referendum
    However, Knight, a former Director of the University of the West Indies Institute of International Relations, thinks the Mia Mottley administration should consider holding a referendum that would make it clear where the population stands on the issue.
    “I would be much more comfortable with a referendum. It is an ideological logical stance being taken by Barbados, no longer willing to hold onto the dress-tails of the UK while shedding the last vestige of colonial dependency on the Queen and the monarchy,” Knight said. “It really doesn’t change our status as a Commonwealth country but it gives the impression that we are shedding the last stage of Britishness and that we will do things on our own through our own President, who will replace the monarchy. That’s what republicanism means for me. Ideologically, it is the correct thing to do, to say to the British that we are having our own way of doing things under the guise of a republic.”
    He said Barbados must decide whether it would have a ceremonial president or an executive head of state.
    Replacing the monarchy
    “I don’t think it is going to make much of a difference” in the lives of Bajans. The Queen was a titular head of state and today the whole question of the monarchy is being called into question. Barbados may turn out to be just one of the dominoes that will fall. We may see others doing the same. There is talk right now in Canada about replacing the monarchy.
    He believes a referendum to decide the final course would be comforting.
    “I would much rather have a referendum so that Barbadians would be making a clear and definitive statement about how they feel about the monarchy,” he went on. “Every year there is something horrible happening with the (British) monarchy.
    Foster disagreed: “I do not think at this stage that we need a referendum in Barbados. I don’t get the sense that the idea of moving to a republic is divisive. There isn’t a sense that becoming a republic is dividing Barbados,” he said. “You resort to a referendum when the idea” was dividing the country so much that you need to have a portion of the people to come down and get the authority over the other. That’s not the case in Barbados.
    “I think that a vote of confidence by the executive on behalf of the people is good enough,” Foster added. “Remember, this issue isn’t something that is new. It has been on the agenda of different governments for more than 20 years. The various executives (governments) had told the people we were going to have sovereignty residing exclusively among Barbadians. I think the time is right to do it and I don’t think there is a need for a referendum at this point. I am ready for a republic.”
    Democratic step
    Using “the language of the day, republicanism is now a settled matter” in Barbados, said Foster, a prolific author and teacher. “Barbados is saying to the world that it needs someone of its own choosing, someone from among its people to be its head of state
    and that is fine with me. It is a democratic step and is the ultimate of citizenship.”
    He said he preferred the ceremonial presidency for his birthplace.
    “The sovereignty of any country should be left to its people and you shouldn’t have an outsider representing that sovereignty,” was the way he put it.
    Like Foster, Dr Walcott, a major voice speaking out for Blacks in Canada, said that the fundamental question for Barbados “is how soon” the constitutional change to a republic can occur.
    Republicanism “should have happened many years ago. I would have liked to like to have seen an Errol Barrow . . . government make Barbados a republic. It should have happened ever since independence,” Walcott insisted. “It has been a long time coming and we can’t move fast enough today to usher in a republic.
    “I don’t think Barbados becoming a republic and removing the Queen as a titular head of state is going to change any of the fundamental arrangements of everyday life,” Walcott said.
    Lashley, an adviser to several national and provincial social institutions in Canada, said it was time for the “Queen to go” and for Barbados “to grow up” as a sovereign state.
    ‘For years, both major political parties have run general elections on a platform of changing to a republican form of government but nothing has happened about it until now,” Barbados’ honorary consul in Quebec said. “But we need to be told what the process (for choosing) the head of state is going to be. We have all known about this issue for years, so it is not new. I have no quarrel with republicanism. I am all for it. My problem is that I just don’t know what the process is to achieve it.”

    Source: Nation


  45. Balance of democracy
    It was a pleasure to watch and listen to fellow columnist Michelle Russell in her recent interview, which is posted on the Instagram page of Instagrammer Itsjustolu.
    The main topic of conversation was the law as it relates to mandating of COVID-19 jabs. This was informative. And there was more.
    Ms Russell also told the story of the fight of Caribbean nationals, like herself, who are residents of Barbados, but were illegally being denied their right to vote in Barbados during the last General Election. Ms Russell is a Jamaican. Her passion for Barbados and the rights of Barbadians was as refreshing as the flagrant flouting of the law by the Government at the time was disturbing.
    That blatant disregard for the rights of Caribbean nationals in Barbados is a reminder that rights are not guaranteed, and there is no right which we have that cannot be taken away. Even if you have leadership with the best intentions in the world, a healthy democracy requires vigilant and active citizens to prevent the path to hell. This is the example Ms Russell is setting.
    As a democracy matures, its citizens must mature with it.
    A movement and rumbling of the will of a free people can feel like instability compared to the complacent, static nature of a people too accepting of authoritarianism. In an immature democracy, people may go along with what the authorities decree, whether right or wrong, and call it discipline.
    Maturing democracy
    In a maturing democracy there may be conflict between groups and between the government and the people.
    This kind of tension will not be seen as a threat but as the inevitable growing pains of maturation.
    Democracy requires a critical balance between rights and responsibilities, risk and reward, limitations and freedoms. This critical balance requires critical thinking. This is thinking on our feet as we adjust and respond to challenges.
    Democracy is not a dance where all the dancers do the same moves in sync. The choreography is much more complex. The dancers have the freedom to make their own moves within the rhythm of the nation.
    Democracy does not give you the same kind of security and stability that authoritarianism can. The stability of a healthy democracy is like Simone Biles on a balance beam; it often has you wondering how the hell it doesn’t come tumbling down.
    I think it was Bruce Lee who said that balance is not just standing still, “balance is when you run like hell to catch it”.
    The issues of COVID-19 and the transition to republican status both challenge the critical balance of our democracy. They are both sensitive and nuanced issues which require a high level of balanced and critical thinking. They both stir up an enemy of balance and critical thinking, which is fear. That fear can make you too hasty or too stiff. Both lead to losing balance and falling off the balance beam.
    There is a school of thought that Barbados has always been a republic in practice.
    Therefore, when we say that Barbados is going republic, what we really mean is that Barbados is removing the Queen as head of state.
    This is an idea that few Bajans, even among those who, according to Austin “Tom” Clarke, grew up stupid under the Union Jack, would have a problem with.
    Those Bajans who, according to Catch A Fyah TV, have been growing wise under the Trident, most certainly have no problem with removing the Queen as head of state and replacing her with a Barbadian.
    But, as is often the case with the wise, the issue is not a simple yes or no, black or white, this one or that one.
    The question is not, “To be a republic or not to be a republic?” It is “How?” The wise Bajan is concerned about the process and its direction.
    Critical thinking
    Are we moving forward in a balanced way? Have we engaged in the type of critical thinking that is necessary to protect rights and freedoms?
    Are the citizens being brought along and helped to mature with the nation? Or are moving forward in a top-heavy, unbalanced way which can lead to an unhealthy democracy? I do have concerns that it is the latter.
    But balance is when you run like hell to catch it. There is no perfect path to progress. It will never be totally smooth and seamless.
    We will often be failing and falling forward. In balancing this stumbling moment in our nation’s history, those in power must be the arms, spreading to slow down and stabilise a leaning torso.
    But more so, we need vigilant and active citizens.
    This is the real power source. Their strength, critical thinking and sensitivity allow for intelligently responding to the complexity of the moment.
    This is the foundation of a healthy democracy. It is the active and vigilant citizens who catch us all.
    Adrian Green is a communications specialist.

    Source: Nation


  46. Referendum not a must

    By Ezra Alleyne
    The huge public debate about the concept of a referendum, along with the related topic of becoming a republic, occupies me today.
    Last week I said that Errol Barrow understood the system of government. As far back as January 4, 1966, in Parliament, he made the point that the referendum concept was not part of the law of this country. He said then: “I do not want anybody to get up and ask any stupid questions in this House. Nobody is going to advise us. There is no provision in this island for a referendum, and as long as this Government is in power, there is not going to be one.”
    Given the context of a pre-Independence constitutional debate a full 11 months before November 30 of the same year, this was a far-sighted statement. He made it clear that he was against referendums.
    The outcome of the Federal referendum in Jamaica confirmed his scepticism. Its outcome killed the Federation. Barrow was having none of it. Hence the notion of referendum was not included in the draft of the Barbados Constitution which Barrow took to London; nor was it included in the final agreed Constitution.
    To allay the fears of concerned Barbadians, he went on to assure them: “I am merely stating the constitutional position of the Government vis à vis the electorate of this island. I am not making any declaration of dictatorship.”
    Knew his onions
    Constitutional founding fathers are not idiots. They know their onions, and Mr Barrow certainly knew his onions in more than one sense.
    A referendum can be a most unwieldy but effective barrier to the proper exercise of power by the executive. For those who support it, I say: It does not belong in our constitutional system. We have begun, at our peril, to import this foreign concept into the Westminster system.
    In 2015, for example, British Prime Minister David Cameron unwisely called a referendum on British membership of the European Union.
    He argued to stay. The “leave” campaign opposed and won. The British economy is still in shock.
    Emotion and not reason won.
    Cameron had to resign. As I said, Barrow knew his onions. Now to the republic. Becoming a republic is more a change of status than of form.
    By severing the legal link by which the Queen is our head of state, we become a republic. Every protective device in the original Constitution remains intact. Fundamental human rights remain untouched. The independence of the judiciary remains untouched. The rule of law continues to reign supreme.
    And very key, the Senate, given its original and unchanged configuration, remains an obstacle to any fundamental constitutional amendment. Such changes will continue to require a two-thirds majority in BOTH houses of Parliament. Even a 29-1 Government does not have a two-thirds majority in the Senate!
    Those who call for education can rest assured that this is the constitutional and educational truth. Here is how Reverend Guy Hewitt described it last year in the British press: “Barbados’ recent announcement that it will become a republic ending the tenure of the Queen as head of state by November 2021 is noteworthy . . . .
    “There is legitimacy in the stance taken by the Prime Minister, Mia Amor Mottley. This highly regarded Caribbean leader has strong nationalist and regional instincts. With many leading Commonwealth Caribbean countries already republics, she, like others, born in the Independence era, sees republicanism as a coming of age.”
    Different view
    Verla De Peiza has a different view. She accuses Mottley of ruling by edict, and says of becoming a republic, that “it is too weighty a change not to be [put] specifically to the country by way of referendum”. What?
    Miss De Peiza is unwise to “diss” the referendum views of the distinguished Errol Barrow who first led her party, and do so at a time when she is being challenged for the leadership by a man who shouts his love and respect for Mr Barrow from any political paling that he ascends.
    But wait a minute. What ruling by edict is Miss De Peiza talking about? Both the House of Assembly AND the Senate must debate and pass the constitutional change before it becomes law. Come again, Verla!
    The people had July, and now August, September and October, 16 weeks, in which to debate the issues, and thank God that in this democracy they are doing just that. On this issue alone, Hewitt has shown himself, by far, the more astute political contender for the leadership.
    The plain truth is that widespread lack of knowledge about the concept of the referendum and a republic has allowed a debate to flourish which can destabilise and agitate the views of those who fear the unknown. A parliamentary republic which has a ceremonial president is simply an enhanced independent rose by another name. It is not designed to, nor does it usually, bear any economic benefits.
    As Rev. Hewitt said a year ago in the article referred to, there is legitimacy in the stance taken by Prime Minister Mottley. I can almost hear Errol Barrow asking Barbadians to re-read his “Mirror Image” speech.
    Ezra Alleyne is an attorney and a former Deputy Speaker of the House of Assembly.

    Source: Nation


  47. Ezra Alleyne go ditch yuh commentary
    This is a democracy and the people have a democratic right to make demands of govt
    Only in a dictatorship the govt has the last word
    Bearing in mind the independent debate was met with forceful opposition in the house of Parliament
    This govt has a 30- o mandate
    The people eyes have been opened to where mistrust of this govt has entered the political fray whilst taking note and into consideration there is no meaningful opposition voice in Parliament which can give important and forceful sway to opposing views and opinions for the people
    Hence the people want to have their voices heard on the issue of Barbados becoming a Republic by other means necessary and that being a referendum


  48. Waru
    instead of talking down black politicians as sellouts on BU all day every day day in day out
    speak to them face to face and tell them if you truly believe it and let them put you straight
    or you will have had the last word and will have solved Barbados problem and won the day
    repeating it on bu is so monotonous and is an eternal reoccurrence


  49. As you come out with your minority criminal criminal minority black politician slave blacks negro cussing everyday many times like a racist car driver with road rage on a daily basis it will be interesting to see who what why triggered your bile each time such as a comment someone said or someone just being a someboody



  50. This govt has a 30- o mandate
    The people eyes have been opened to where mistrust of this govt has entered the political fray whilst taking note and into consideration there is no meaningful opposition voice in Parliament which can give important and forceful sway to opposing views and opinions for the people
    Hence the people want to have their voices heard on the issue of Barbados becoming a Republic by other means necessary and that being a referendum

    problem with referendums is they become political circuses on social media with trolling and numbers games and clowns win and become ringmasters

    Brexit and Trump both used psyops of dog whistle racism and spam nonsense by foreign agents
    in USA 66% of 75% white majority voted for racist platform as they had no issues with it
    in UK they copied Trump and voted for racist nationalism and self harmed themselves

    weed referendum is also nonsense as it will be about non-smokers deciding if smokers can smoke and they already do

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading