← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Sunshine Sunny Shine

WHO IS ERNEST JACKMAN?

WHAT IS HIS BACKGROUND IN THE BARBADIAN LEGAL SYSTEM?

HAS HE EVER WENT BEFORE THE BAR ASSOCIATION FOR MISCONDUCT OR MISAPPROPRIATION OF CLIENTS FUNDS?

HOW MANY CLIENTS HAVE LAID COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE NAME OF THIS LAWYER?

WHAT CONNECTIONS DOES HE HAVE THAT AFTER SEVERAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST HIM HE CAN STILL PRACTICE LAW?

WHAT RECOURSE DO BARBADIAN CITIZENS HAVE AGAINST LAWYERS LIKE ERNEST JACKMAN WHO WITHHOLD THEIR MONIES?

IS THE BARBADOS BAR ASSOCIATION A MERE FRONT FOR LAWYERS AND THEIR WRONGDOINGS?

WILL THE GOVERNMENT OF BARBADOS ASK FOR INVESTIGATION INTO CLAIMS AGAINST ERNEST JACKMAN?

DO BARBADIAN CITIZENS SUCH AS THE LATE STEPHEN JACKMAN HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF BARBADOS TO BRING LAWYERS SUCH AS ERNEST JACKMAN BEFORE AN ESTABLISH TRIBUNAL?

Ernest Jackman must account for the 2.4 million he withhold from the late Stephen Archer. The Barbados Government should offer assistance in this matter. All others such as the Bar Association, the Utility Company, the Family of Stephen Archer and any others with connections to this case needs to be CALLED TO ACCOUNT!

Ernest Jackman: WHO ARE YOU, WHAT ARE YOU-COME FORTH


Click image!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

157 responses to “Ernest Jackman: WHO ARE YOU?”


  1. MsEU MM
    Stupse! #blusterandblusterers


  2. lol..something bothering you fowl??

    yall got no heart, ya care nothing about ya own people. Have you no shame?

    you steal so much, now the world is afraid of you, ah heard some lawyers on the island no longer even want to be associated with ya criminal syndicate, wished they had never met ya or knew ya…..

    ah guess there are those who know when it’s time to break ranks…it’s called self preservation..

    how does that make yall feel?


  3. Enuff.

    Really? Don’t you want to see something done about the injustice in Barbados? Even if you think these methods don’t work, can’t you at least give her an “A” for caring and one for effort.

    Or are you suggesting that there is no real injustice that needs addressing?


  4. Waru aka Salemite
    I have no time to waste with you…periodt! I don’t know who is y’all and breaking ranks. I am not part of any y’all or ranks or a fan of demons.

    Donna
    You onstand what bluster means right?


  5. “I am not part of any y’all or ranks or a fan of demons.”

    so wait, yall fall out too?

  6. Sunshine Sunny Shine Avatar
    Sunshine Sunny Shine

    Puff Enuff

    Now you have proven to me what heartless son of bitch you are. It is clear you do not give two wuk ups about the late Stephen Archer. Please do me a favour, go f… your self. I respected your comments once, not anymore.


  7. Who is appealing to Facebook to remove posts dealing with matter? All it does is to expose the dishonesty of the profession. You lawyers close ranks even if there is a rotten smell in the precinct. The thing about an odour is that it cannot be contained especially in a small space.


  8. For as many times this man has been brought before the courts for accusations of stealing clients money he should have bern disbarred
    The Daily nation in 2009 reported a story related to theft where he is released on 70thousand dollars on bail with two sureties
    He was accused of stealing $150,828 between August 21 and Oct.11 2008 and $17,379between june6 and Oct112008 the proceeds of two Barbados National Bank cheques, payable to himself but belonging to Esther Doreen Brewster -Thizy
    Last September Jackman appeared before the same court charged with stealing 678,414 which belonged to Hej Ltd ,between june 23 2006 and March 5 2007,and stealing 367,085 which was part of a BNB cheque in the amount of 560 437. belonging to Foster Belle and payable to himself

    Source Daily Nation Oct 13 2009


  9. Same old bullshit from the uselessly corrupt bar association. Get another lawyer to do what, just to find out that the lawyers from the bar association are still corrupt, still covering up for those who stole this man’s whole compensation and left him to die slowly so they can cover their tracks.

    What about calling the police and let them investigate and LOCK UP all the lawyers and their bribers involved in that theft.

    “Unable to get the money owed him by his lawyer while he was alive, paraplegic Stephen Archer’s family may have to turn to another lawyer in a bid to unlock the funds, the head of the Barbados Bar Association has said.

    But while declaring that the association does not condone lawyers’ misbehaviour by lawyers, president Rosalind Smith-Millar has said it is not a “magic solution” to conflicts with clients.

    When questioned specifically about Archer’s complaint, Smith-Millar said the bar association could not act solely on a newspaper report.”


  10. Very clear for the world to see what a useless, backward, ignorant, unprofessional lot pretending to be guardians of the judiciary residing in the bar, when it’s time protect the people and the judiciary…they close ranks and revictimize the victims. They all have the attributes of common class thieves always going on the defensive to protect their crimes. The disciplinary committee is even more useless, there is never anything any of these scum can do to protect the public from their thieves in the bar association and the parliament…

    Nothing works on the island, not to benefit the majority population.

    “When questioned specifically about Archer’s complaint, Smith-Millar said the bar association could not act solely on a newspaper report.

    Archer, died two weeks ago, having never been paid by an unidentified lawyer the proceeds of a personal injury award.

    Fifteen days after he celebrated his 30th birthday in 1997, a telephone pole fell on him occasioning him significant bodily injury.

    The utility company fulfilled its legal obligations to Archer and paid $2.7 million in compensation to his attorney-at-law on his behalf, he had told Barbados TODAY in April.

    But he revealed that he was never given a cheque nor was it ever deposited on his personal account.

    Smith-Millar told Barbados TODAY it would be up to Archer’s family members to take up the matter as there was nothing the Bar could do.

    She said: “If the deceased has the right to some kind of property, their estate continues to have that right.

    “So whoever is entitled to Mr Archer’s estate would need to go and get legal advice as to how they can deal with the estate and the estate then would be able to do whatever is necessary.

    “Now, the Bar Association per se, does not even know who the lawyer is and is not authorized to pick up people’s fire-rage.”


  11. Read again…they are all LYING..they all know about this case.

    this new bar head was singing a different tune only weeks ago, i said she was lying THEN and i know she is lying NOW..they are all culpbble in this CRIME and orchestrated death…to steal 2.7 million dollars..

    This guy complained in the news over a decade ago that he was not paid, the insurance company SAID they paid his ATTORNEY the money, it was very clear then and even clearer now that he never told his client he received the money YEARS BEFORE….

    if a bedridden man is complaining a lawyer stole his compensation, afraid to call the lawyer’s name because that is the FEAR these evil thieves have driven into the population OVER DECADES…if they talk the truth they get sued, their families get victimized and lose their jobs, they all know this,,,…a REAL BAR ASSOCIATION would have sent someone to interview this victm, but they all sat around waiting for him to die just so they could say that they COULD DO NOTHING…

    no good trash.

    “Now, the Bar Association per se, does not even know who the lawyer is and is not authorized to pick up people’s fire-rage.

    “We cannot read a news report and launch an investigation and do something.

    “We don’t know who it is; we don’t know if the things we read in the newspaper are true; we don’t have any standing to just chase after whatever the problem is.”

    She said it would have been the paraplegic’s responsibility to report the matter to the Bar’s Disciplinary Committee if he believed he was not being treated fairly by his legal representative.

    Smith-Millar continued: “If Mr Archer in his lifetime had realized he was not being treated properly by his attorney-at-law there is the Disciplinary Committee to whom complaints are made. They are not made to the Barbados Bar Association.

    “We are not a magic solution. There is a committee, there is a process that has to be gone through.

    “We do not at all condone misbehaviour by lawyers – understand that very clearly – but we cannot just read a newspaper and decide to go and investigate and launch some kind of action.

    “We cannot do that because we are not authorized to do that.”

    Up to his death, Archer would not name the lawyer at the centre of the dispute.”


  12. I told yall not to rely on these cold hearted, souless negro BEASTS from bar association, disciplinary committee, judiciary nor the parliament, they are all the same, they do not mean clients or citizens well.

    keep exposing them on the international stage, they deserve no less.


  13. **** ” afraid to call the lawyer’s name because that is the FEAR these evil thieves have driven into the population OVER DECADES”

    Not only is the common man afraid to call names, but so too is the media. I have read stories, where the name of the ‘culprits’ were not mentioned. The story of the destruction of the underground structure never mentioned the name of the construction firm. I thought that was an essential part of the story.

    ****” “If Mr Archer in his lifetime had realized he was not being treated properly by his attorney-at-law there is the Disciplinary Committee to whom complaints are made. They are not made to the Barbados Bar Association”.

    I believe that based on results, we are already aware that the BBA does not address these concerns. Perhaps a greater discussion of the role of the BBA and the disciplinary committee. I would suggest Smith-Millar go their website and read the following:

    To promote honorable practice, and settle disputed points in practice;
    To improve the administration of justice and procedure and trial by jury;
    To establish and maintain a system of prompt and efficient legal advice and legal aid
    To settle questions of professional conduct, discipline and etiquette;
    To further good relations and understanding between the Bar and the public;
    To protect the public right of access to the courts and of representation by attorneys-at-law before the courts and tribunals;

    If they adhere to these few items, it would improve the group.

    And for your reading pleasure is some text from their website.
    http://barbadosbarassociation.com/faqs.cfm?FAQID=2&ActionDetails=true

    Q. What are the procedures for lodging a complaint against an attorney-at-law for professonal misconduct?

    A client or any person wanting to complain against an attorney-at-law for professional misconduct must visit the Secretary of the Disciplinary Committee, located on the premises of the Barbados Bar Association at ‘Leeton” Perry Gap, Roebuck Street, St. Michael

    The client must collect 2 forms:

    (a) “A FORM OF APPLICATION AGAINST AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW”and;

    (b) “A FORM OF AFFIDAVIT BY APPLICANT”.

    The first form must be filled out and signed by the APPLICANT and the second form must be signed by a JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.

    The complaint will then be reviewed by the Committee in a formal hearing to determine if a case of professonal misconduct is made out against the attorney-at-law.

    Where a case of professional misconduct have been determined the Committee must within 21 days forward to the Chief Justice a report of its findings and any recommendation for appropriate sanctions to be instituted agianst the attorney-at-law.

    The matter is then heard before the Court of Appeal and the court shall either endorse the recommendation of the Committee or institute its own sanctions against the attorney-at-law.

    Did you see the words professonal (repeated twice) and agianst…
    is how you know you are dealing with jokers.
    They need to hire an intern and let him/her run all of their text through a spell-checker


  14. “Up to his death, Archer would not name the lawyer at the centre of the dispute.”

    Huh?!!!! He had a ghost lawyer? or maybe everybody fretting about nothing……


  15. To the legal luminaries…
    If a lawyer is repeatedly appearing before a judge for the same complaint, are there any tools in the judge arsenal that he can use to modify the lawyer’s behavior?

    How are cases assigned to courts so that the same crooked lawyer go before the same court (time after time)?

    To the common man
    Don’t you think some of these judges need naming and investigating, It appears as if they are part of the problem.


  16. “Don’t you think some of these judges need naming and investigating, It appears as if they are part of the problem.”

    same thing everyone is now thinking, the judges who are syndicate members are part of the problem.


  17. When Therold Fields stole this elderly client’s money….the theft happened in HIS OFFICE, .refused to repay her and DRAGGED this lady through the corrupt court system for 8 LONG YEARS..before he was finally disbarred…….using this same useles process….that Theo has described…..to date i have no heard this lady received a dime of what this wicked lawyer stole from her and tried to drag out time so she would drop dead before he could be disbarred.


  18. Great Job Sunshine Sunny Shine
    Keep on bowling Waru.
    Mariposa, you have proven the expression ‘Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while’ is true.


  19. EnuffOctober 3, 2019 9:02 PM

    Donna
    You onstand what bluster means right?
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    From the Oxford Concise Dictionary.

    “bluster – talk in a loud, aggressive, or indignant way with little effect”

    Hence my comment –

    Even if you think these methods don’t work, can’t you at least give her an “A” for caring and one for effort.

    Or to spell it out for you – even if you think her loud, aggressive or indignant way has little effect, can’t you at least give her an “A” for caring and one for effort?

    Now do YOU onstand?


  20. There is a reverence many Barbadians confer to lawyers that cannot be explained logically.


  21. Ping Pong,

    Unless you are a supremely confidant person who believes you can match the attorney’s “intellect”, a person who believes that you have all the facts and the EVIDENCE on your side, you are afraid to go against a lawyer in Barbados. If you believe that the lawyers have set up a system to benefit themselves and that the system in the form of the other lawyers and judges has their backs, you as a person not well-versed in the law would fear a defamation suit that could deprive you of the very settlement you may be entitled to. Thus people find themselves between a rock and a hard place instinctively knowing that the lawyer is stringing them along but still with an element of doubt that prevents them from calling his or her name.

    Television series and legal jargon (use of Latin and unnecessarily complex sentence structure) have created an aura around attorneys that only those who have sat in classes with them at primary and secondary school and beaten them academically would know is not deserved in most cases.

    I don’t know for sure that this is what happened with Stephen Archer but based on my own experience and those of other persons I know, I believe it is more likely to be true than not.

    These people think they are smarter than everybody else. These people think they can take advantage of anyone. These people try to intimidate even the obviously intelligent and educated into believing that they are clueless.

    My own attorney, knowing quite well who he was dealing with, tried to fight off my challenges by doing so. Dude left me speechless for two whole days! The audacity!


  22. Oh shirt!!!!!!!! Mariposa one shot win the match!


  23. In hindsight, two errors took place that led to the current crisis…..
    (1) Mr. Archer unfortunately hired Mr. Jackman as his lawyer
    (2) BL&P/Insurance company, paid monies to Mr. Jackman instead of writing the cheque(s) to Mr. Archer directly.

    Since, it seems, we have no watch-dog agency to police our legal system … please don’t tell me its the Bar Association…lol….. Mr. Archer’s estate must now find an honest, hard-working lawyer to try to recoup the monies owed to their deceased relative…..GOOD LUCK!!!


  24. And can I name the attorney who tried to mislead me with misrepresentation of my rights ?

    No! His secretary and junior attorney are the only witnesses. All I could do is let him know I knew better and insist on my instructions being carried out. I also instructed by e-mail that we communicate via that route in the future. He pretended not to have received any such e-mail. Steupse! Like if I don’t know how e-mail works.

    But he got my message. Don’t play!

    PS. Neither can I divulge the name of the female gynaecologist who recommended speedy surgery to remove a “possibly cancerous” internal organ, against the findings of an ultrasound examination. Fool thought I wouldn’t be able to understand the medical terminology of the ultrasound report. I did. Sought confirmation from another doctor. He was astounded. He said even the ultrasound examination was unnecessary and even if she had made a mistake referring me for the ultrasound the report would have cleared up her error.

    Body part still intact. The damn thing never even gave me a problem. BUT SHE NEVER PUT IT IN WRITING and there were no witnesses.

    She recommended the same surgery for my cousin. Then hormone replacement therapy. Shortly after, my cousin ended up with cancer of the breast.

    From medical website:

    Possible Side Effects of Hormones Therapy After Hysterectomy
    Some possible side effects related to HRT after overall hysterectomy includes:

    Increased risk of developing heart problem such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and so on. Increased risk of establishing various types of cancers including BREAST CANCER and endometrial cancers
    Blood clot conditions

    Now when her family reviews the events that led up to the surgery they question the necessity of the surgery and the doctor’s motives. They picked up the signs but deferred to her because she was a doctor…

    According to my hairdresser, this woman recommended Caesareans for all their common pregnant clients. The fees are significantly higher than normal delivery.

    And so Barbadians need to remove that aura from around the legal and medical professions and challenge them. And get them to communicate more in writing.


  25. Some of those doctors can be just as slimy and dangerous as the lawyers, those are the ones who like the lawyers work for the insurance companies while taking client/patients cases in conflicts of interest…….they are SELL OUTS.

    The hypocrite oath means nothing to them…

    Very few of them observes the Hypocratic Oath.


  26. Ernest Jackman is me. Ernest Jackman is you. He is as Bajan as apple pie!

    His behaviours are no less culturally bound than those of any other Bajan.

    For forms of dishonesty was always inherent in what it means to be Bajan.


  27. were

  28. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Mr Blogmaster, the blogger @Donna most aptly gave a rationale and a response to YOU with her 7:47 when you opined that : “There is a reverence many Barbadians confer to lawyers that cannot be explained logically.”.

    I agree with her fundamental review and would add that when ALL our ‘larger than life’ leaders locally and regionally were attorneys (recent exceptions of last 25 + years noted) its QUITE logical the reverence conferred on these men and women.

    We never stop and properly analyse that these supposedly bright folks (yes we competeted well with them at secondary school @Donna but they also got the high final grades at A’s often leading to scholarships- the leaders, that is) rather than use their intellect and attentive study habits to study medicine, engineering, manufacturing or any other such field that can add real value to societal growth prefer instead this rather ‘simplistic’, ‘controlling’ profession of fiddling with laws!

    To the point you have repeatedly made Mr Blogmaster : THAT legal education, has been an ABSOLUTE over emphasis of our educational funding!

    Now…as far as public campaigns go we can all commend this current push of somehow seeking a CURE by @SSS and @Heather’s petition but we must also examine the other side of @Enuff’s callous sounding remark…the PREVENTION.

    At some other point he asked in effect ‘why is Ernest Jackman still in the legal profession?’ That’s a valid query…why is this man STILL being the attorney of original record for any right thinking Bajan on ANY matter involving monetary rewards?

    He should be handling secondary claims or matters of an administrative nature NOT civil suits with monetary payouts.

    ANY Bajan who needs an attorney and who has the basic commonsense to look in the telephone directory, or ask for a referral for representation MUST also have the basic commonsense to do simple background checking.

    I can understand way back in early 2000 that Mr Archer would not have known of Jackman’s thiefing ways but since all the lawyer’s dirty legal laundry has been shown publicly and with the ready ability to SEARCH the net , I MUST assume he is no longer scamming SENSIBLE Bajans….but only those who want to be scammed!

    PREVENTION… BU has a prominent lawyers’ rogue gallery and that along with a vigorous social media campaign highlighting their callous, thiefing behaviour is the way to continue.. preventing has always been better than curing!

    I gone.


  29. Most of the lawyers I know never got any higher grades or scholarships.


  30. Ernest Jackman is not me! I have my flaws but not that kind.

  31. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    Yes @Donna re your 9:54 …that’s why I referenced the leaders re that reverence comment. Every Bajan knowns that Adams, Barrow, Adams were attorneys and scholarship winners…the aura that surrounding that was stiffling for quite a few generations!

    There have been LOTS of scholars over these many years and realistically very few (seems to me anyhow) of them actually studied law but perception can be a bad itch…the simple fact is that lots of prominent pols are attorneys who were basically good students so folks do confer that (false) reverence of which the Blogmaster speaks!

    It is what it is but the tide is turning … on all professions really. There is just TOO much wrong doing by lawyers and some judges and average Bajans are seeing them as no more than educated crooks these days…the issue of doctors perfoming unnecessary procedures is just as crooked and just as old (done for years).

    Who isn’t crooked these days…according to @Pacha it’s an inherent Bajan (life really) thing!


  32. DPD

    Got it.

    PS. Like my biggest critic (he who shall not be mentioned) I do sometimes find your language hard to understand. lol. Strangely enough I did understand what you were saying to him though you did misunderstand his initial comment. That was a comedy of errors on both parts. I nearly died laughing.


  33. Ms.EU MM

    I am not heartless, I call it being frank and interested in real action. You have done two posts in a week and what? Have you sought to get an attorney to help out the deceased’s Estate, as the Bar Association is advising? Instead, grandstanding on BU!! I ask again, after a similar grandstand on Mr.Blackman’s matter and promises of posters, what did you do or has happened? Pass me with the BS! #bluster#agendas

  34. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @Donna, do engage briefly re your last post…last comment, first.

    What was it that I misunderstood about your nameless critic’s remark? I read his remark as saying ‘let’s suppose someone in Bim got totally p’eed off and attacked a wayward attorney who had legally wronged them in the way the residents of that island off Antigua felt they were wronged by the Bird administration’

    …Was that an incorrect interpretation?… I then used HIS commentary to slide into my rant that vigilantism/anarchy is never good for a democratic society as once started we can never properly end it!

    …What was wrong with that slide down that rabbit hole?…. I never said the man ADVOCATED violence…simply that his comments could be “interpreted” that way!

    2nd…my language has been described as old-fashioned or something so by others…I can’t see how really but any writer MUST craft his/her message properly to his reader so help me to understand what is “difficult to understand” re my dribbles!

    I remember another nameless blogger giving me a kiss of death 😂 many moons ago when he said I write so clearly on BU…I laffed, because the brother had a tendency to write too highfaluting and badly so thus his praise had to be taken in that context.🤣

    But do tell is it the old fashioned language or is it the 30 sec post which are labelled long winded that creates the misunderstanding!

    Just asking…merci!


  35. Steven Archer had no children. It seems he had little family support. Those who helped him are dead. Unless the sister who helped him had a child, I don’t care if his family gets the money. I care that another lawyer seems to have gotten away with his misdeeds.


  36. DPD,

    I can’t put my finger on why I find you a little harder to understand than the average blogger. It is not important enough for me to figure out. When I’ve had enough sleep I read your posts. Sometimes I agree. When I haven’t had enough sleep I scan and scroll.

    But the blogger was perhaps right about the old-fashioned thing because now I think of it I always picture you in an old-fashioned three piece pinstriped suit and a fob watch a la Dickens. But take heart! You are never wearing a top hat! Nor even a bowler. lol


  37. @enuff

    Citizens protest in different forms given their circumstances. History has shown that a single event may serve as the tipping point. Understand the point.


  38. Yet another two bit Bajan lawyer taking the pizz (again) with the tacit approval of the toothless, corrupt and wholly unfit for purpose BBA.

    More evidence of Hal Austin’s failed state status.


  39. Have you sought to get an attorney to help out the deceased’s Estate, as the Bar Association is advising? *

    The Bar Association has shown itself to be a joke. That advice to “to get an attorney” a la Fumble Stuart is highly offensive, insulting even. Where will this attorney come from?
    From same rotten, local BBA-backed pool that created the problem in the first place?

    #failed state


  40. David
    This is Barbados. We’re dealing with an attorney, that I have made clear already on this blog, who I would not let sign my passport picture far less anything related to money given his repeated run-ins over clients’ funds. See Mariposa’s post above. I await a result due to two posts on BU within a few days. People need to stop reading my posts justs to oppose.

    Abigail de Salemite
    You’re the demon I am referring to!🤣🤣


  41. “PS. Like my biggest critic (he who shall not be mentioned)……… ”

    Donna

    Your above comment is an obvious reference to me (and I read other of your contributions in which, as Bajans would say, you were “dropping remarks).”

    Yuh mean tuh tell me dat, ONLY on ONE occasion we had a difference of opinion on ONE issue……. we “told off” each other and that makes me your “biggest critic?”

    Come on, you’re stretching this a bit too far. Again, as Bajans would say, “yuh like yuh got me in mind.”

    On the other issue you raised (and not to “reap up the past”), I understood what the goodly gentleman wrote on that occasion, but mentioning having difficulty understanding his contributions was a reference to his contributions in general.

    What raised my concern was that I asked a question, which he immediately interpreted as one meant to incite vigilante violence.”Your remarks can be very easily interpreted as a nod and wink to the same sort of action done in Antigua being done here for bad lawyers.” (10:20 PM).

    In response to my “saying” I cannot understand how asking a simple unambiguous question, in which there wasn’t any definitive suggestion made on how a duped client should react, be interpreted as inciting violence, the goodly gentleman went on to write about nuance writing.

    If my question was indeed opened to different interpretations……any rational thinking, open-minded individual would have enquired about my thoughts or intensions, explore those interpretations and respond accordingly.

    Instead, the goodly gentleman responded BASED on HIS interpretation, as was evident by his “rant filled” contribution of October 1, 2019 3:04 PM…… and subsequently made the SNIDE remark re:

    “Reread it carefully as if u are a reader unaware of YOUR thoughts at moment of writing…”

    That remark “says it all,” which I interpret to mean inciting violence was in my thoughts at the time I wrote the question. In others words he seems to be insisting his interpretation is what I actually intended to “say.” Reading my mind.

    After all, according him…… “I would also add that English is a very nuanced language.”


  42. “Abigail de Salemite
    You’re the demon I am referring to!🤣🤣”

    i must be the good good demon cause ah saw all ya other fellow demons are FB stars.

    ya acting like Jackman is the only crooked attorney in the bar, that viper’s nest is infested with tiefing lawyers..he is the only one yall are willing to throw under the bus at this time, but he should call all yall names..including Cheltenham’s..

    ah heard yall had a “we gathering” meeting at Hilton Hotel and the returnees already in Barbados are PISSED that they have been MISTREATED in Barbados every year of their return, stay tuned, it will also be a FB special…cause it’s nuff nuff returnees with nuff nuff complaints…yall don’t even know how to treat the poor elderly people ya calling home to ROB…some have had the bar association of lawyers treatment where their properties DISAPPEARED…

    how come yall did not live stream that one…


  43. Artax,

    Did you not see my lol?????? Just spicing it up. Did you not also see that I still agree with you on many other issues?


  44. You need help woman. Bye!


  45. Running away with tail tucked firmly between legs and the fireworks has not even started yet..


  46. Artax

    Re: “Reread it carefully as if u are a reader unaware of YOUR thoughts at moment of writing…”

    No. He meant that you should try to read it through the eyes of another reader who would not be aware of your thoughts,


  47. I keep watch of How BU and Barbados go after the little crooks that the Bigger Crooks put out to the Public to feed on, If you made it to the COURTS to be in the Nations News or CBC you know you are a small-time crook. Just because NOW the Bigger crooks carry the title of QC,AG, Judge,DPP, Minister, Prime Minister,and GG, most think something is being done ! NOT! Fools again the small crooks just started doing what the Big Crooks were doing for Years, Just that Donville is not a lawyer and did not think of the rules or laws of American, he must have been thinking that he was still in Barbados! The Other 17 that had plans to fly to the States who canceled their Trip after the Minister was ARRESTED!, BFP/COUP will be Happy to place the CUFFS on these titleholders After Office!
    There is much more to Jackman and the talking of his part in all of this, We dont have Permission to Post what we know, Its not Hour case, But the Government and COW& Friends is in this mess?So if you can call this lawyer Jackman he is not the only Name to be called!


  48. Thanks for confirming what we have been saying about the political class. It is worthy of another blog.


  49. One of our BU bloggers opined something to the effect that if all lawyers were audited and control of Client accounts was removed, the

    majority would likely go bankrupt.

    The only logical reason I could find for lawyers refusing to give clients their money is if lawyers use the money

    for “cash flow” and short to medium term investment.

    Use a client’s money to build some condominiums, sell them and put the money back in the client account unless the ‘lifestyles of the rich and famous ” eats up the profits and a chunk of the client’s funds and ……doan have to read and spell fuh wunna.

    It seems to me that ” waiting for client to die ” is a business plan.


  50. I am still waiting to get ab explaination of the fowl’s logic, she won’t have Jackman sign a passport form for her…but the bar association sees nothing wrong with having him as a member and that is DESPITE his reputation….we can say the same for hundreds of lawyers who are bar members..

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading