← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Heather Cole
Submitted by Heather Cole

Several months ago, I wrote an article entitled Independence: A Blessing or a Curse. The next week, it was my intent to write an article on how the banking sector fits into the equation. I also intended to put in an insert from my manuscript. Then I wanted to include Ann Riley-Fox’s story. However, I kept putting it off. The news I received yesterday was not good. Here is what I may have written months ago. Maybe now it is being written at an opportune time.

My earliest memory of a financial institution was not pretty. It was about the Civic Society in Bridgetown.

The Civic Society was located on the corner of the eastern end of Eastern end of Swan Street. There were few banks back then and many people including my mother saved some of their wages there. I do not know how much she was paid -it never entered my mind to ask but I believe that it was not much. However, she set aside a little each week to deposit at the Civic Society in Bridgetown. Maybe she was saving to buy a house for our education or just saving for a rainy day. I do not remember how old I was but one Saturday when she went to deposit some money the Civic Society was closed. There was no notice on the door to advise if the institution was closed or relocated. In dramatic fashion Civic Society just disappeared. It never reopened. Gone were her life savings –so too the life savings of many poor Barbadians. How much I do not know. I was too young to understand. I do not recall if she cried, if so not in my presence.

Thoughts of it now that I am grown would put me in despair if every cent I possessed disappeared into thin air. I do not remember if the newspaper carried a story about it. We never found out what happened to the money. It was just gone, probably into someone’s pockets. As far as I am aware no one was ever held accountable for what happen to that money. Maybe it was a secret someone took to their grave. After that, for the rest of her working life, my mother never trusted any financial institution and saved her money at home until she retired and her pension had to be deposited into a bank account.

It was not the last time Barbadians suffered losses through financial institutions. It has happened with banks and insurances companies and the results were always the same; the people are the ones who loose and are not protected to prevent future reoccurrences. The biggest of these to date has been the CLICO scandal.

It would be remiss of me not to look at the role played by the banking sector in a post-independence Barbados. With an excess of 15 billion in liquidity banks have very restrictive, deceptive and abusive lending practices or refuse to lend to black Barbadians. They have always portrayed a lack of corporate social responsibility to the poor. In our 50th year of independence it is a crying shame that there is no legislation to ensure that the banks meet the entire credit needs of the communities that they serve. There is no Equal Credit Opportunity Act. By now the banks should have been meeting the credit needs by providing services and consumer loans to low and moderate income areas. They willing open their hands to receive money so to add to their savings or reinvest but hardly lend to the poor black community. One reason why black entrepreneurs and business persons have not grown significantly is because of restrictive banking policies.

There is however another occurrence that the banking sector seems to have escaped unscathed with their reputation intact, people are ashamed to have themselves identified as victims. It is known as foreclosure or the banks taking up a person’s house. Whatever you may call it; we seem not to want to discuss it. Yet thousands of Barbadians have lost their homes due to the harsh economic environment that has caused them to lose their jobs.

Ann Riley-Fox, who was a successful black business woman in Barbados, yesterday she lost her fight with First Caribbean International Bank who unceremoniously evicted her from her property. A change in the business policies of the bank negatively affected her as a black business person. It was as though she was targeted and set up for failure. I said she lost her fight but what I really intend to say is that her fight must now become the fight of every Barbadian, those who have lost their homes, those who are losing their homes and those who do not know if and when they will lose their jobs which will jeopardize their mortgage. It is time to cast off our shame and rise up and fight back restrictive policies that for far too long have never been in our favour. Some may argue that we have credit unions but what good are credit unions that turn around and bank your saving with the banks that are against your growth, economic independence and advancement?

The very fact that black banks are growing now in the USA should be taken note of. We spend half off our lives working and saving our money at these commercial banks, then for 20 years or so pay them a mortgage. Then one day you lose your job and what happens the bank forgets the good times in a flash. It is time that Barbadians to pool their resources to form their own bank and withdraw their finances from the foreign commercial banks . It is my hope that the Fairness Committee will examine this and other initiatives.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

98 responses to “Exposing Our Shame”


  1. It is time for Credit Unions to be allowed to form their own banks….the laws prohibiting them must be changed.


  2. @Vincent

    Which laws do you refer?

    Specifically what prevents credit unions from forming a bank?


  3. David

    We need to hear from Caswel on this,he is far more qualified than I am to quothe the relevant passages.


  4. And somewhere by the corner of Marhill Street and St Michael’s Row, stood a black owned bank, called something like Cooperative Credit Bank. It was operated by one Mr Simmons,or Simmonds and was often referred to as Simmonds Bank. Like the Civic, many low income Barbadians deposited a little something with Simmons. Every Christmas time there was always a near riot out side of the bank, as Simmonds used to frequently run out of cash, and had to close down the operation, in order to go down Broad Street to withdraw money from a bank account, which was in his name. Simmonds also sold land to poor people at Mellows, without any papers. They eventually loss what ever monies they had paid to Simmons.
    Simmonds pioneered the planting of the seed of distrust in the minds of Barbadians,in relation to dealing with financial institutions.


  5. Barbadians already have their own black banks called meeting turns absent of govt regulation just a heavy dose of trust and a smidgen of common sense and it seem to have worked out pretty well in helping many poor families buy school books and supplying grocery on the table and paying the monthly bill.
    Now if govt would allow barbadians to openly operate a small black bank with same rules and regulations as the meeting turn mom snd pop homegrown bank the possibilty that a bigger operation can unfolded launching a big black owned barbados bank to succeed is a reality.
    However the models being used by mainstreem banking industry has produce theft and fraud as seen in the recent Wells fargo scam meltdown
    Blacks can produce a model that is simple free of regulation that does not encourage theft and fraud similar to that of the model draw upon the meeting turn.
    Might sound silly to some but bears the question why have the meeting turn remain a domaint place for financial resources after so many years for the black family a mom and pop idea solely built on trust


  6. In the meeting turn from time to time you will find some scoundrels who come up with an excuse to have their turn advanced, due to sickness in the family etc, and then scarper off and dropping out of the system, still owing money.


  7. @Heather Cole ‘It is time that Barbadians to pool their resources to form their own bank.”

    But isn’t this exactly what the Civic Society was?

    Did the Civic fail because the depositors money went “into someone’s pockets” or because the Civic was too soft hearted, too unbusinesslike, too unwilling to foreclose on those of its borrowers who were unable to repay their loans?

    If First Caribbean International Bank did not foreclose on “Ann Riley-Fox, who was a successful black business woman in Barbados” how then was first Caribbean supposed to recover its money?

    @Heather Cole “Ann Riley-Fox, who was yesterday unceremoniously evicted her from her property.”

    Sadly if Ms. Riley-Fox was unable to service her loan (perhaps for many months or years) then the house in which she lived was no longer hers.

    I am not a defender of banks, just a defender of common sense. Obviously interest rates on loans in Barbados are too high, and their interest rates on savings are way too low. But the central bank permits this, nay encourages this, and the bank’s governor does not talk much much to the media/us.

    Because if he does not talk to the media how then are we the people supposed to understand what it going on.

    Not all of us have earned doctoral degrees in economics.


  8. The problem with black only banks is everyone takin money out and nobody puttin money in


  9. I am not aware of any black population that is adequately banked.

    Like mathematics, physics, statistics, and so many other fields of expertise, successful banking seems to be beyond the capabilities of most black people. So whether we live in Barbados or Burundi, Toronto or Trinidad, Nigeria or New Jersey, we see posts like this one, seething with resentment of our own incompetence and failure, but seeming to blame others for our predicament.

  10. NorthernObserver Avatar

    “With an excess of 15 billion in liquidity banks have very restrictive, deceptive and abusive lending practices or refuse to lend to black Barbadians.”

    IF you can prove that banks are more interested in the colour of the skin of their customers, than in the colour of their money, they can be sued. And given the banks huge aversion to risk, I doubt any of them will knowingly expose themselves to prosecution under discriminatory lending practices.

    Restrictive I would bet is correct. Have you ever seen the write offs of major banks in the Caribbean? They lost a small fortune. The liquidity refers to the system, that money belongs to their depositors not to the bank.

    Commercial banks are in the business of making money. They are not a charity nor a development bank. They don’t ‘have to lend the money’ if in their assessment the borrower cannot meet the obligations of the loan. Much of this is simple mathematics not at the discretion of the loan officer.


  11. UNDERSTAND THE CONSTRUCT/PROTOCOL… The Central Bank of Barbados is not owned by Barbados, it is owned by the ROTHCHILDS

    https://realitieswatch.com/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled-by-the-rothschild-family/

    THE CENTRAL BANK construct the rules for commercial banks… therefore by Policy and contracts they rule by an established FRAUD from the top, all that follows is fraudulent and illegal, their policies and contractual business are of illegal construct, This is absolute grounds for any recourse of INJURY suffered via BANKING STRATEGIES.

    A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT IS RECOMMENDED for
    1. FALSE and MISLEADING INFORMATION/advertising/statements.
    2. FALSE and FICTICIOUS CONVEYANCE OF GRAMMER as an illusion written in adverb verb.
    3. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS under the color of law.
    4. CONDUCTING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY HAVING KNOWLEDGE and making no effort to modify or disclose.
    5. FOR THE REFUSAL, DELAY OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW.
    6. FOR NOT CONVEYING LEGAL DOCUMENTS in the correct Quantum Parse Syntax Grammer.
    7. JUDGEMENTS made by impersonators. PERJURY (having knowledge of a fact but tells a lie TO TWIST IT).
    8. MISAPPROPIATION. Failing to carry out ones’ legal duties..monetizing other than that intended.
    8. MAIL FRAUD by non affixing or photocopying of stamps and issuing supposedly LEGAL documents.
    9. MISREPRESENTATION. (ANYTHING within within a box cannot be considered).
    10. UNILATERAL CONTRACTS (Contracts with one signature, not signed by the other party).


  12. @NorthernObserver

    This article from last year supports your point about how the large Canadian Banks Caribbean operations are being taken to the cleaners. It should say a lot about the performance of regional banks if we venture to extrapolate.

    Trouble in Paradise: Inside Canadian banks’ billion-dollar Caribbean struggle

    TIM KILADZE

    Globe and Mail Update (Includes Correction)

    Published Thursday, Feb. 26, 2015 8:58AM EST

    Last updated Friday, Feb. 27, 2015 7:16PM EST

    45 Comments

    They arrived in droves starting at 5:30 a.m., desperate to secure a steady pay cheque. By midmorning, the anxious mob totalled 5,000 people.

    Sandals, a Caribbean hotel chain, was hosting a job fair in Barbados to hire staff for a brand new resort. Because thousands of people showed up for 600 jobs on the October morning last year, scores of applicants were forced to wait outside under the blistering sun. Things went from testy to unruly as the temperature neared 32 degrees; Sandals had no choice but to call the cops.

    The chaos is one face of the ugly downturn sweeping through the Caribbean. Though the global financial crisis technically ended a few years ago, its punishing aftershocks are still being felt—and they’re amplified on island states that depend on tourist dollars for support. Countries like the Bahamas and Barbados are marketed as idyllic vacation spots with white sand beaches, but their local economies are anything but serene.

    In the Bahamas, the unemployment rate was 15.7% at the start of February—higher than in Portugal, one of Europe’s worst-hit economies, and well over double Canada’s rate. The situation is even worse in Barbados—and arguably even more surprising, since the loyalty of British tourists to “Little England” had seemed to be bred in the bone.

    The colonial tie meant little during the financial crisis, and the resulting downturn drove Barbados’s debt load to nearly 100% of its gross domestic product. Struggling to pay the bills, the government fired 3,000 public servants last year. It’s also gone cap in hand to hotel developers, offering major tax concessions to spur investment—hence the scene at Sandals.

    Financial institutions are, of course, at the epicentre of this storm. Take the case of Sagicor Financial Corp., a leading regional life insurer, based in Barbados. Because the country’s sovereign debt has been downgraded several times, Sagicor’s corporate debt rating has also suffered. In January, the company abruptly announced it was relocating its head office outside of Barbados, shocking the island’s 290,000 citizens.

    Canadian lenders have it even worse. Our banks are often praised for sidestepping the U.S. mortgage crisis and for avoiding the ugly economic woes that still wreak havoc in Europe, but the truth is, they’ve hit trouble in paradise. Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Nova Scotia and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce are by far the Caribbean’s three largest lenders, dominating both personal and commercial banking. Combined, they’ve written off more than $1 billion in the region since the Great Recession.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-magazine/perils-of-the-caribbean/article23199267/


  13. Miss Ann Riley-Fox need to examine her HARD COPY of her “contractual agreement” with the Bank…. IF she has one …for any claims of the above.

    Please familiarize thyself of the content of these links…

    http://dwmlc.com/

  14. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    $1 billion is whatnthey have written off, that’s all, did they mention that they were also insured and did they even bother to tell you what huge profits they have earned in the 40 or so years they been in the Caribbean.

    I would not shed a tear fio any of those banks and waste my precious water, if they were not making out like the bandits that they really are, they would leave the Caribbean permanently.


  15. I feel a sense of loss and fear of the future as if I am helpless. I contend that it won’t be long before we see people taking matters into their hands or a platform being prepared for a wave of riots. Remember 1992? Barbados boycotted Kensington. That fight is in us and the right spark will light an uncontrollable fire. Anderson Cummins was not a cricketer that lit up the field but he was simply ‘unfaired’ and that provided the catalyst for the boycott. It was the coming of age for us who knew nothing of the 1937 riots. Please remember that we had just marched the previous year against the government’s austerity measures.


  16. Simple Simon November 20, 2016 at 12:08 AM #

    Did the Civic fail because the depositors money went “into someone’s pockets” or because the Civic was too soft hearted, too unbusinesslike, too unwilling to foreclose on those of its borrowers who were unable to repay their loans?
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    No because the rent was too high and they were unable to pay after years of struggling to keep head above water and keep the business in good standing eventually they were unceremoniously evicted by the white owners


  17. Colonel Buggy November 19, 2016 at 10:36 PM #

    I thought Mackie Simmonds was also involved in the Civic and did they not have Panama money to buy plantations such Joe’s River,Frizers,Springfield,Trents and some more?


  18. Banks have become too cumbersome and looking out for sel interest ;; look how the CEO of a bank lives using other people money to enrich themselves while the depositor have to pay high fees to support them and the high flatulent members on the board
    Give me an ole fashioned meeting turn any day where the pie is equally shared among its members there is no skimming of the depositors money to make those at the top become fatter and fatter of the little guy money
    Better yet the rules are simple and easy to follow with no long hangman noose attached in the form of belly aching fees and out of control interest rates
    The reason why big banks encountered so much problems is because they forget the rule of thumb “Small is better”


  19. What an odd concept ..lending money and wanting it paid back,


  20. It is difficult to even open a simple business account these days.


  21. Oh dear, Oh dear. The governor of the central bank is on record as saying how well the Canadian banks did during the crisis. I believe that is based on an essay published by the NBER. Our banks are now effectively supervised by the Bank of Canada.
    But it is wrong. Canada may be an OECD nation, but financially it is second eleven. A properly managed Guyana should punch above Canada, a well run Jamaica should carry the same weight as New Zealand.
    That is why when Osborne wrongly appointed Mark Carney as governor of the Bank of England I wrote that he was wrong. Time has proved me right.
    The job should have gone to Adair Turner, one of the freshest and most dynamic minds at work in London. Turner’s problem is that he can think for himself, he has his own mind. A bad sign in this society.
    He should follow group think.


  22. What is odd is that conventional banks does not lend money they borrow the depositors money and then sell it back to the depositor as a loan at high interest rate that only smells of theft and fraud which is legal in the banking industry;


  23. @TheNegrocrat

    Is it difficult to open a ‘simple business account’ and a credit union or regional bank?


  24. @chad99999 November 20, 2016 at 3:59 AM “I am not aware of any black population that is adequately banked. Like mathematics, physics, statistics, and so many other fields of expertise, successful banking seems to be beyond the capabilities of most black people. So whether we live in Barbados or Burundi, Toronto or Trinidad, Nigeria or New Jersey, we see posts like this one, seething with resentment of our own incompetence and failure, but seeming to blame others for our predicament.”

    It is not just a black people thing. There are many white people in the U.S and elsewhere who are “under water” that is the house is worth less that the amount of money that is owed on it.


  25. What a shame!

    There was a time when Ann Riley along with Joseph Niles and Sister Marshall were the local acts to follow for those interested in the religious stuff.


  26. A group named Fairness in Action has been formed to respond to Ann’s plight. Anyone who is facing a similiar problem or is desirious in helping can contact fairnessinaction@gmail.com or telephone 882-8304.


  27. @Heather

    It would be interesting to know the change to the agreement by FCIB which created the duress for Ann Riley-Fox.

  28. NorthernObserver Avatar

    @ac
    ” look how the CEO of a bank lives using other people money to enrich themselves while the depositor have to pay high fees to support them and the high flatulent members on the board”

    Doesn’t that remind you of the PM, his band of ministers, and the appointees to statutory boards.


  29. Mackie Simmonds had a crooked hand in everything. Unfortunately many people were not aware of his schemes and place good money,and trust in his hands, only to loose it.


  30. @:David I will provide that info later today.


  31. I thin a man called Jonesy and his son Arnold Alleyne, grandson of the builder William Alleyne ran the Civic Credit Society.

  32. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar

    Ann Riley-Fox, who was a successful black business woman in Barbados, yesterday she lost her fight with First Caribbean International Bank who unceremoniously evicted her from her property. A change in the business policies of the bank negatively affected her as a black business person.

    One law comment here, Heather. In cases like this, given the existence of the “equitable right of the mortgagor to redeem” in all mortgages, eviction would scarcely have been unceremonious, but would have taken place only after a failure on Ms Fox’s part to comply with certain indulgences granted or agreed to by FCIB.


  33. chad99999 November 20, 2016 at 3:59 AM #

    Like mathematics, physics, statistics, and so many other fields of expertise, successful banking seems to be beyond the capabilities of most black people. So whether we live in Barbados or Burundi, Toronto or Trinidad, Nigeria or New Jersey, we see posts like this one, seething with resentment of our own incompetence and failure, but seeming to blame others for our predicament.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    that is a lie ,, i present a model that is successful and has been around for many generations financially run by blacks and owned by blacks where money is deposited by several individuals into a savings account weekly and a return on the individual deposit is double or tripled depending on the amount of depositors involved better yet not tied to gargled govt regulation


  34. I am perplex by this decision. First, was there a mortgage indemnity guarantee insurance cover? Was there any protection insurance on the mortgage loan? Could the lender not offer an interest-only deal or even a repayment vacation until the borrower either got back on her feet or sold the property.
    Who now gets the equity she has built up in the property over 36 years? Will this property join the long list of those sold by auction in what appears to be a cash-driven cartel? If sold by auction, will an unqualified lawyer be the auctioneer?
    I say again, we need first class financial regulation. Where are our consumer advocates?

  35. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    This story is odd, a mortgage on a house is not 36 years, nowhere in the world, it’s insane, so we can presume somewhere along the life of that mirtgage, she refinanced, I hear bad stories about Scotia as well as CIBC bank..

  36. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ ac November 20, 2016 at 4:06 PM

    What model have you presented to refute Chad’s claim? There is significant validity to Chad’s claim with loads of evidence to support it.

    Barbados was once touted as the first ‘black’ nation in the modern world NOT to buttress such a claim. But look what has been happening with downgrade after downgrade and with its social and physical infrastructure crumbling day-by-day.

    Check the shit on the South Coast and you would see ample evidence of stark incompetence and failure of an administration which continues to jeopardize the country’s economic bread basket.


  37. The last people ,I believe, who ran the civic were the Laynes.


  38. The jokers who run our insurance companies are now complaining about the liability costs of road traffic accidents. But they get off lightly. The police, hospital and fire brigade should invoice them every time they are called out.
    The problem is insurance company incompetence. Where are their underwriters and actuaries? Motorists should be compelled to pay for the claims or get rid of their cars. Motoring is not cheap, and wild driving is very expensive.
    It should be law that insurance companies should be compelled to publish their claims records. Expose the whiplash brigade.


  39. Ann Riley-Fox, who was a successful black business woman in Barbados, yesterday she lost her fight with First Caribbean International Bank
    ++++++++
    The reality of the eviction belies the notion of “successful”, Banks ae not run on sentiment they exist as profit making entities that are answerable to Directors and ultimately shareholders. There are thousands of human interest stories about people who have been downsized, laid off or packaged by CIBC because of non- performing loans that negatively impacted profit. The lady gambled and lost end of story, sometimes when the handwriting is on the wall people find it difficult to “cut their losses” and exit with their dignity. Perhaps the bank may have been amenable to a discussion where the home is sold and the loan paid off and the excess from the sale provided to the homeowner. Instead we have a long drawn out court case where there is a tear jerker appeal to the public and the only winners are lawyers.

    This situation is not applicable to the foregoing but for women reading this, if your spouse requests your signature on a loan for a business where your home is collateral, please ensure you get what is called “Independent Legal advice” to ensure that you are aware of the consequences should the loan be in default.


  40. miller i hope you have not forgotten all those failing big banks that help trigger the financial melt down world wide and yes i was referring to a generational mom and pop bank called the meeting turn that has been around before i was born and still exist a model that has not buckled under any economic pressure a model that has help secure a financial safety net for many black families living on the rock self owned and operated by predominately black people.
    Now if you can take that model and expand with better ideas maybe u can become the first owner of a large and economical saving bank for black people
    Think of the power and influence you would have to be a big time backer of political parties


  41. @Sargeant

    Is it always so cut and dry?


  42. @David, Here are the details:
    Ann applied for an overdraft in October 2008 as is the custom to purchase Christmas stock.
    She was refused and then granted on Friday November 28.

    She proposed to repay $100, 000.00 over three months. Jan, Feb, March 2009.
    They said they would have to be repaid at the end of the same December.
    They took it back from her account at Dec 31 2009, 29 days after.
    She had no choice because her goods were in the port. ( predatory lending )

    On December 31,2008 the bank took the whole $300,000.00 then told her that she was over her limit.
    She never recovered after that.

    Late 2012 she proposed to develop 1 acre of land in a very desirable area – lower estate ridge (which they were holding against company debt) by building 10 townhouses
    It was discussed with the bank who told her that the most they would want is the interest paid.
    She went ahead found a experience developer who brought in his technocrats and finance people and agreed it would be a good project and they could make some money. They were committed to the project.
    After all were finalised she went back to the bank one month later and they said no that they wanted their money now. They did not want any long term solution.
    That was 2012. It is now four years hence.

    Given the length of time that has passed, they could have opted for a long term solution. By now they would received what was owed to them.


  43. @Heather

    Some gaps in the info. Why would she have ordered $300,000 worth of stock BEFORE getting approval from the bank? If she received the approval from the bank BEFORE stock order she would have known the conditions of the temporary overdraft to settle in 30 days? Financial companies work with their clients and to consider seasonality for example. It is difficult to understand at this stage what happened here -what the BU household knows is that her business was very popular before its demise.

  44. NorthernObserver Avatar

    I think some the year dates maybe incorrect? 08/09

    However. To be granted said overdraft facilities/loan, there had to be some agreement in place? The terms are usually part of that, not something to be negotiated/proposed afterwards?

    And have we managed to combine a personal asset (house) with a business? She was guaranteeing her business debts using her house as collateral?

    If the bank “took” the full amount owing, then she didn’t owe the bank anything? The ensuing development project becomes confusing. There is alot more to this overall story.


  45. @Hal Austin November 20, 2016 at 9:18 AM “A properly managed Guyana should punch above Canada, a well run Jamaica should carry the same weight as New Zealand.”

    True.

    And if my grandmother had balls she should have been my grandfather,


  46. http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/71110/riley-fox-chides-fcib-underselling-home
    Riley-Fox chides FCIB for underselling home

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/71192/riley-fox-fighting-fair-share
    Riley-Fox fighting for fair share

    http://www.pressreader.com/
    Riley-Fox fighting for fair share
    “A comprehensive renovation of the house in 2006 which cost just over $400,000 nearly doubled the floor space from 1,800 square feet to 3,431. Included in this retrofit were a recreation room with a fully equipped gym, office/bedroom, bar and lounge area…the small kitchen downstairs was gutted and transformed into a large chef-styled cooking space, complete with granite counter-tops and back splashes. Each bedroom was expanded and jacuzzis, large walk-in closets and dressing rooms were brought in. High quality fixtures like chandeliers, recessed lighting and pendant fittings completed this makeover.”

    Maybe, just maybe too much was spend on extending the house, so between repaying the money borrowed for the extensions, and servicing the needs of her business Ms. Riley-Fox was left entirely as the bank’s mercy…and banks are not known for being merciful.

    Perhaps it is not wise to take out large mortgages when we are in our 60’s, perhaps there is no need to double the space of our homes when our children are grown and have left home or are almost ready to leave, perhaps a chef-styled kitchen is not necessary when we are only cooking for 1 or 2 or 3 people. But I bet that some builder/contractor was made very happy.

    The contracting world/Barbados economy was entirely NOT Ms. Riley-Fox’ fault, but the fact that she had a large new mortgage in a contracting economy left her with no wiggle room and the bank pounced (or waited patiently for 4 years)


  47. Simple Simon,
    I know it is a Bajan habit to make fun of things they do not fully understand. Let us take Guyana: Guyana is bigger than England, the sixth biggest economy in the world, with more natural resources, including gold, bauxite, rice, and many others as you know. Guyana has a total population of about 750000, compared with Britain’s 63m. In fact, London alone has a population of eight million.
    There are enormous opportunities for development in Guyana, if only they can rid themselves of the racist politics. Canada is a second rate country, which punches above its weight in the Caribbean.
    With Jamaica and New Zealand, the populations are similar. NZ has a lot of sheep, but not just the people, while Jamaica has bauxite, world-class coffee and the most creative people in the English-speaking Caribbean.
    What both Jamaica and Guyana need are good railways, moving people out of rundown West Kingston and build decent middle class homes in the suburbs.
    Guyana needs a railway that will make travelling between Berbice and Georgetown much easier. Guyana can take in the entire Caricom population, instead they are crowding Barbados, Antigua and Trinidad.


  48. I am not a friend of banks in the Caribbean, in fact I think most of them are dishonest. But if these are the real facts of that woman’s demise, then it is bad management, not the bank to blame.
    Many people think that if they come in to money it is enough to go out and start a business. They do not take professional advice, they do not undertake any training nor do they hire consultants to guide them.
    It looks as if this woman was over ambitious in ordering Bds$300000 of good before securing the loan; in other words, she did not know how she was going to pay for the goods.
    The repayment period was a bit short, but that should have been sorted out during the discussion about the loan – unless the bank changed its mind – it could not unilaterally change the contract once it was signed..
    Were the goods insured? Was the loan insured, over and above the bank taking a lien on her home?
    If she had the loan and could not repay in time why did she not re-negotiate the repayment?
    I don’t think we have got all the facts.
    Finally, if her business was not on a sound footing, why did she need a big home, from all reports?
    It reminds me of one woman with a big loan from a credit union who could not repay. She pestered credit union bosses to extend the loan, in the meantime she was driving her 4×4 – living above her means.
    It is the Barbadian disease.


  49. They care nothing about her equity in the property. If one of the f their friends have the money and find it attractive enough an offer they will take his/her offer once they recover the amount they need. If that is not the situation it goes on the market and remains locked down and deteriorates for the next five of six years unoccupied until they take the most suitable offer. When that happens she will probably be told she still owes them as they didn’t enough to clear the balance of the mortgage and then proceed to take legal action to recover the remainder. The banks/ bankers in this country are a despicable bunch that should be avoided.

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading