Submitted by Pachamama
WIPA President and CEO Wavell Hinds and WICB President Dave Cameron
WIPA President and CEO Wavell Hinds and WICB President Dave Cameron

We have argued in the past that the West Indies Cricket Board (of Control) WICB(C) is a slave plantation. An institution where the house niggers on the Board constantly  ‘conspire’ to end the hard won rights of our international players. Their aim, under every guise, is to reverse the benefits to international players and return them to the good old days where once our best players retired a hat would be circulated for a ‘benefit’. These vicious ‘house niggers’ or Black Bothas at the WICB(C), as an institution, did nothing to transform the world of cricket when we were ruling the universe. They lacked the vision to re-balance world cricket towards our natural strengths or as their masters in England used to say – Calypso cricket. But the Indians have captured that innate Caribbean instinct and have made 20/20 cricket the revolutionizing instrument that was always frond upon by the rootless elites at the WICB(C). So Caribbean cricket is now headquartered in India.

Not satisfied with their generational failures of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. The Board now seeks to hide their perpetual non-performance under a misbegotten developmental construct purportedly to spread incomes to a larger number of people, cricketers. But this is a management problem not to be solved on the backs of international players. The MOU and Agreement which the Board has surreptitiously arrived at with a dictatorial leadership of the West Indies Players’ Association (WIPA) President Wavell Hinds lacks any moral authority. These arrangements, unbeknownst to the international players, now seek to decrease match fees by 75%; the Board’s international slaves are to be paid no compensation for the marketing of their images; and there are to be no ICC fees for international players. The WICB(C), as slave master, are again seeking to exert rights only know to be claimed under chattel slavery.

This is not the first time. In 1991 this same Board wrestled power from the cricketers and transferred to itself. This coup d’etat effectively ended the era of dominance, was characterized by the mistreatment of Lloyd, Richards, Haynes, Lara and our giants generally. It used Richardson as a patsy in achieving the goals their masters in England required. We are talking about a Board that after 20 years of dominating world cricket still, with their perpetually outstretched, begging bowl, had to ask the taxpayers of the Caribbean for major infrastructural development monies for refurbishment of stadia. What right does this institution have to run West Indies cricket if it can’t do the basics rights? How can these people on the WICB(C) now seek to make this feeble attempt to ‘develop cricket’ on the backs of our international players? What kind of a heartless Board would want to renegotiate emoluments that leave our players being the cheapest in the world? Only a slave economy model could properly explain this.

Last time it was Richie Richardson. This time it is Wavell Hinds who is to act as a cypher to again impoverish our players, curtail their marketing power as a human right. This is supposed to be a capitalist system, no? How come communist ideas could be so brazenly enforced by a leading regional institution? What kind of an idiot could accept these terms, as presented? What manner of man could even suggest such?  Nobody, nowhere in the world cares about the 95 players at lower levels in West Indies cricket the Board now seeks to redistribute other people’s money to. Certainly, people want to see the international players or watch them on the internet or TV, not second ‘eleveners’. That the Board believes it needs this cadre is a matter for the Board. The international players have no role in the financial workings of the Board, do not direct its affairs and cannot be responsible for the funding of the failures of the Board. Failures to innovate. Failures to lead when they were in a position so to do. Failures to industrialize the West Indies way of cricket. Failure of its high performance centre (HPC) to deliver even one international cricketer after a decade of investment. Failure of its intelligentsia to craft a vision which brings higher than average value. A value proposition that would take it out of the poor house and constrain its reflexive resort to picking the pockets of the international players.

The contents of the MOU and Agreement could only be arrived at through a willful conspiracy between the Board and the misguided leadership of the WIPA. Indeed, initial reports suggest that the international players were left out of the loop. Given the history of interactions between international players and Board it seems highly unlikely that such a drastic surrender of basic rights would have been countenanced by the player. That Hinds who purports to represent the WPA ignored player intervention and surreptitiously  delivered a sweet heart deal to this Board reeks of illegality and should attract the attentions of a court of competent jurisdiction. This open attempt at wage thief by the WICB(C) should also result in criminal charges being laid and stiff sentences being imposed on all members of the Board and the Executives involved.

WIPA President and CEO Wavell Hinds and WICB President Dave Cameron
WIPA President and CEO Wavell Hinds and WICB President Dave Cameron

46 responses to “The WICB(C) Conspires Against Our International Players, Again!”


  1. […] The WICB(C) Conspires Against Our International Players, Again! […]


  2. When will the incompetence in West Cricket stop? This is a multimillion dollar business and we have these jokers lurching from one mistake to the next.


  3. another side of the story?

    Hinds responds to Bravo
    Thu, Oct 9, ’14

    CaribbeanCricket.com has obtained a copy of a letter sent by WIPA President and CEO Wavell Hinds to Dwayne Bravo on October 8th, following the match with India that had been under a cloud of uncertainty. The letter reads:
    Dear Mr. Bravo
    Thank you for your e-mail of October 7th and congratulations to you and the team on today’s victory.
    Before making any substantive response I am compelled to first refute in the strongest possible manner all of your previous assertions claiming ignorance on the part of the “senior players” regarding the proposal to discontinue the payment of $35,000 per day of cricket for the benefit of members of the senior West Indies team, and the reallocation of these monies to help to fund retainer contracts for an additional ninety (90) members of WIPA.
    Please recall your attendance at WIPA’s AGM held in Trinidad on Saturday, February 1st 2014 at the Capital Plaza Hotel where you, other senior players including Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Ramnaresh Sarwan, along with several other members in attendance, participated in a lively and lengthy discussion about this issue following a presentation made by WIPA Director, Michael Hall.
    The minutes of that AGM record your comments expressing 100% support for this initiative and you will be provided with a copy of the resolution authorizing the WIPA Executive to pursue same, which was passed by majority vote of the members present on the floor. The minutes also reflect the only qualification to your support, which was to ask that the current WIPA executive make every effort to ensure that the shortfall in revenue accruing from the reallocation, be made up in other areas of player remuneration.

    I also wish to place on record my strong rejection of your assertion that the press release issued by WIPA on October 3rd 2014 was “inaccurate”. Contrary to the misinformation contained in your now public e-mails to me, the new agreement between WIPA and the WICB reflects the following increases in match fees (15% across the board) and retainer contracts (ranging from 12.5% to 25%), along with the introduction of two (2) new contract categories :
    Match Fees Previous New

    Test match $5,000.00 $5,750.00
    ODI $2,000.00 $2,300.00
    T20I $1,500.00 $1,725.00

    Retainer Contracts Previous New

    Category A+ (new) $150,000.00
    Category A $120,000.00 $135,000.00
    Category B+ (new) $125,000.00
    Category B $100,000.00 $115,000.00
    Category C $80,000.00

    You have expressed, purportedly on behalf of all of the players currently in India, the belief that
    “…this present WIPA Executive under your leadership has failed to properly represent the best interest of ALL the players.” While we respect your right to express this belief, the fact is that this WIPA Executive has made a concerted effort to represent the best interest of the MAJORITY of our membership – as was clearly pointed out at the AGM.
    I would like to respond to your suggestion of there being a “special relationship” between WIPA and the WICB which seeks to “embarrass” and “demonize” some players who represent the West Indies, by stating that the relationship which exists between WIPA and the WICB is special only insofar as it is a departure from the adversarial nature which characterized it under WIPA’s previous leadership. My Executive has made a designed effort to operate in an environment of mutual respect and professionalism, with the common goal of providing an opportunity to earn a livable wage for more of your fellow cricketers, while attempting to produce better cricketers. I hope that you would see the value in such an approach.
    I note your concern regarding my advising that I would be consulting with members of my Executive before responding to the questions posed in your correspondences of “the past few days”. Your erroneous conclusion that I needed to do so in order to get the answers, once again demonstrates the stark contrast in my approach to leadership as against what was the previous norm. I am not a one man band.
    You have advised that you have conducted your own “preliminary investigation” while awaiting my response to your questions, and have shared the results of those investigations with me.
    I must let you know that during the course of our negotiations with the WICB, our team of Secretary Wayne Lewis, Treasurer Nixon McLean and myself were provided legal and IR advice by resource personnel who are either members of the Executive of the Federation of International Cricketers Associations (FICA) or resource personnel provided through their offices.
    Regarding the negotiation process, I wish to address the following two (2) assertions made in your e-mail of yesterday:
    3) None of the players were consulted during and after the negotiations of this purported new MOU. This is a process that has been the common practice between previous WIPA representatives and the players. This was completely ignored.
    4) The Players were never given the opportunity to consider the document (MOU) and approve it before it was signed consistent with past practice.
    I am sure you will recall that prior to my current role at WIPA, I have held several positions within the Association’s executive – including that of Vice President from 2006 to 2012. While I am willing to concede that best practices may not have been observed by not sharing the document with any but a small group of our members, I cannot agree with your above assertions that “this has been the common practice between previous WIPA representatives and the players’ or that players have previously been given “the opportunity to consider the document (MoU) and approve it before it was signed consistent with best practice”.
    I must also refute the following assertion:
    10) WIPA is receiving in addition to the 3% of all players earnings, a sum of $500,000.00 USD annually from WICB (1% 0f WICB Revenue) once this new agreement remains.
    The assertion is wrong on 2 counts:
    1. WIPA does not receive 3% of all players’ earnings. In fact there are many of our members who contribute nothing to the Association by way of dues – including a number of them who are currently on tour in India. May I also remind you that it was this current WIPA executive which (at the request of some “senior players”) reduced the percentage of players’ earnings to be paid over as dues from the previous 5% to the current 3%.
    2. Your equating 1% of the WICB’s projected revenues over the current 4 year cycle of the new MoU to $500,000 annually is significantly inflated.
    You have asked a number of questions regarding the finances of the WICB in your correspondence of October 7th and I respond by advising that disclosure of the WICB’s annual revenues to WIPA is an obligation of the WICB embedded at Article 8 of the new MoU.
    In the midst of this response, I acknowledge receiving further correspondence from you (received today October 8th at 2:46 a.m., Jamaica time) which repeats much of what has been previously communicated, and which inter alia:
    1. Calls for the immediate and unconditional resignation of myself as President & CEO, and of the other members of the current WIPA executive “who may have a conflict of interest.”
    2. Suggests that this would allow you and the other players “the right to seek the necessary advice of professional advisors who we have confidence in and take the necessary course of action as we see fit.”
    3. Advises us that you “shall inform the WICB that they are to not take any instructions from any of the Officers until such time as we are able to consult with the members of WIPA to put in an interim measure that is acceptable to all.”
    I must take this opportunity to remind you that there is a process embedded in WIPA’s Memorandum & Articles of Association regarding the election and removal of officers, and that your call for some members of the current executive and Board to resign is not supported by that process. We were placed here by the rules of our Association, and will leave only according to the will of the majority of our membership as provided for in those rules. There will be no resignation by any member of the current executive as our negotiating team considered they had a mandate, took legal and industrial relations advice, consulted with members from time to time, if not all members, acted diligently and in good faith in the interest of all members mindful of our fiduciary duties as Directors, and are of the view that they acted and fulfilled their duties properly in all the circumstances, including the subsequent ratification of the signing of the new agreement by the Directors present at our Board meeting held in Jamaica on October 2nd, 2014.
    Notwithstanding, you are free to continue to engage the advisors whom you have already consulted, or any others, as we seek to find a solution to what I still believe is a salvageable situation. We are happy to have any discussions with you to reach an amicable resolution to this present difference.
    Your intention to inform the WICB that they are not to take any instruction from this current executive has no merit, as the duly elected executive of the WIPA is the only body which the WICB will recognize and deal with in matters to do with West Indian cricketers.
    I note also the reference made in your e-mail of October 7th to the alleged “confusion” on my part stemming from the “….plethora of positions that you occupy being Chairman of Selectors for Jamaica Senior team, a Board member of the Jamaica Cricket Association and the dual role of President and CEO of WIPA have in some way contributed to the confusion or perhaps being a member of the same club as Mr. Cameron in some way may have clouded your judgment”.
    In responding to the above I must remind you of your own involvement with the club to which Mr. Cameron and I belong, you having played for Kensington CC at our invitation at the start of your career in 2004. How ironic that you have been elevated to the captaincy of the West Indies ODI team under Mr. Cameron’s presidency
    I also refer to the following statement in your e-mail of October 8th calling for my resignation:”…..we the players have now lost all confidence in your ability to properly represent the players in any meaningful way and as such, we are calling on the Officers of WIPA and any of those who may have a conflict of interest to tender their resignation unconditionally with immediate effect.”
    Where was the conflict of interest when the former President and CEO of WIPA was invited to sit, and accepted a seat, on the WICB’s Board of Directors in 2006?
    It is both unfortunate and surprising, that your “advocacy” on behalf of the players has been coloured with personal attacks on my competence and integrity considering the history of our relationship. You should never forget where you are coming from, and who you have met along the way to the current location in your life’s journey.

    Wavel Hinds
    President & CEO, West Indies Players Association


  4. This behavior by Wavell Hinds is not to be entertained. It is regressive, ridiculous, reprehensible, repressive, rotten and reeks of rancour. Does he not bear any shame that should lead him and his cronies to demit office. The players have sacked him. He should be ashamed of himself for failing to properly represent the players. I always knew that he was full of haughty and juvenile conduct. It was once said that while during his playing days His Excellency Sir Garfield was speaking about technique to players at Kesington Oval and Wavell is reported to have said that he could bat better than the national hero and therefore did not need to listen. He was always woeful .


  5. lighthouse

    re regressive, ridiculous, reprehensible, repressive, rotten and reeks of rancour. THIS IS BEAUTIFUL ALLITERATION. LOVE IT

    RE Wavell is reported to have said that he could bat better than the national hero and therefore did not need to listen. WELL THIS MIGHT EXPLAIN WHY HE IS NO LONGER PLAYING BECAUSE HE HAD HIS POOR TECHNIQUE EXPOSED.

    OF COURSE HIS WORDS ALSO INDICATES THAT HE HAS DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR


  6. The statement by Hinds casts a somewhat different light on some matters. However, he failed to make contact with several points made by Bravo. In spite of the need for moderation on these we can never be on any side other than that of the players. The people who play the cricket. Not the cricketing bosses at neither the WIPA nor the WICB(C).


  7. @ lighthouse | October 9, 2014 at 3:16 PM |

    What Mr. Hinds reportedly said about his batting ability has nothing to do with his response to Mr. Bravo. Mr. Hinds seems to be pointing out that WIPA is attempting to spreed the wealth around rather than give the lion share to a minority group of “elite” players. You should address the issue being debated rather than go after Mr. Hinds personally.


  8. Now we have the Captain of a West Indies cricket team on tour in India engaged in a war of words on behalf of the team with the president of the players association. And a match to be played on Saturday.

    brassbowles indeed.


  9. David this is atypical of Caribbean / West Indian leadership and management.

    Let us hope the cricketers realise that their individual performance is the basis on which they will be selected to play at any level of cricket.

    The Canadian Premium cricket league will start up in a year or two.More opportunity for the swipers (cow lashers)


  10. @Bear in mind they are playing cricket in the country controlling the game today.

    http://www.ptvsports.tv/live-news/cricket-news/west-indies-vs-india-1st-odi-highlights/


  11. @ David

    That they could still win the match while fighting the cricket bosses at home tells us about the political activism needed to stimulate excellence.


  12. @PAcha

    One swallow does not a summer make. There is an issue to be resolved and although we all will take the win, there is a stink!


  13. @ Bajan in New York. You have to understand what is going on in this region with respect to players. For too long they have been brutalized by the air conditioned board room bullies. The players are the persons whom through sweat blood and tears that generate income for West Indies cricket. Their playing days can be cruelly short so the ability to earn on a high incline is a priority. The board room bullies are usually accountants and other papered cronies who can work in other areas for long years. The players on the field must receive the lion share of the income. Those players on the fringes need to fight to displace them and then receive top salary. Giving fringe contract players good income will serve as a deterrent to improvement. You must surely remember how the board room bullies ended careers of lofty and iconic players such as Richards, Haynes, Lara and others. This type of disrespect must end. My advise to players is to dump WIPA and each one get his own manager/representative as other international athletes do. Players talent, status, and brand must allow them maximum earning power. Can one imagine the W I without brand players such as Gayle, Bravo, Ramdin, Dwayne Smith, Narine, Holder, Pollard and Sammy? It would be internationally unattractive with a severely reduced earning power. Whether the board likes it or not these type of players are the superstars of WI cricket that the likes of Wavell Hinds and Dave Cameron can never become. It is grossly insulting to see a nuisance like Wavell disrespecting Bravo.


  14. @ David
    Let us make our basic position clear. As long as Lloyd and Richards are alive there should be nobody else who could have anything material to say about WI cricket. LOL

    And we see Lloydie is back in the setup, again. He has brought back Samuels. We hope that his radical approach the time before the last would reignite the era of excellence. They have tried all kind of misfits. Now the Real Mccoy is back, let’s see what happens, even in times where all other cultural indicators are out of favour. Meaning there is not the kinds of excellence in other areas needed to support cricketing excellence.


  15. @Pacha

    The problem is bigger than Lloyd, he will help for sure by his stature in the arena but some heavy restructuring must occur at the administration level to jettison the drag.


  16. @ David
    Yes, the administration of WI cricket never be fixed under the current paradigm.

    No, last time Lloyd started the era of dominance the Board was no more ineffective, but he did by leading on the field. When the history of management is written there will be no more effective outside-in strategy. We believe that Lloydie has the ability to succeed in cricket inspite of a hapless Board. And so he must. He must be a Dictator rite large, with the players as his Board, selection committee etc. The cricket bosses elsewhere must be duly ignored until we can help the players get the rid of them.


  17. @Pacha

    Did you say Llyodie? Check from 3:25 on the video.



  18. It is amazing that they batted without helmets.

    Thanks to the Internet I get my fill of cricket past and present.


  19. @ David
    Those bats seem like cookou sticks in their hands too! Compared with the half doors of today.


  20. @Hants

    Surely you are watching a good response by the WI?


  21. Another melt down.

    A stupid move to not allow inform Samuels bat in his #4 position?

    Was Samuels sulking in his turn at wicket?

    He seemed to be playing back a lot for a man who gas twinkle toes.

    OR the change in ball.


  22. Painful to watch Windies self destruct.


  23. @Hantsie

    Can sense the pain from Barbados…lol.

    On another note, is it our players are business illiterate that they do not understand by widening the pay bands and creating incentive category for top 10 they are not disadvantaged?


  24. This spectacular failure today does not make sense. We wonder whether other forces are at work? Another game is being played.


  25. lighthouse | October 10, 2014 at 8:31 AM |

    Did you read Tino Best’s contribution to the debate in today’s Nation? The issue is complex, so taking the side of Mr. Bravo or Mr. Hinds might not be the best way of achieving a just settlement.


  26. THIS IS THE BEST INTERVIEW I HAVE READ ON CRICINFO BY ANY CRICKETER FROM ANYWHERE
    http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/788503.html


  27. An eye opener:

    Secrecy the sticking point as ICC falls out with testing centre

    George Dobell

    October 14, 2014

    The University of Western Australia had been developing models and protocols to test bowling actions for the ICC for the last 20 years © Getty Images

    The ICC’s recent concerted campaign against illegal actions has brought it into a position of significant professional disagreement with the agency long involved in its tests. Experts at the University of Western Australia (UWA), whom the ICC relied upon for the last 20 years to develop models and protocols to test illegal bowling actions, have criticised what they call the "ridiculous" secrecy surrounding the new procedures and say they have raised doubts over the reliability of the recent tests that have seen several bowlers suspended from various levels of the game.

    The dispute provides a disturbing backdrop to the sudden toughened approach towards the monitoring of potentially illegal actions by the ICC only a few months before the World Cup in Australia and New Zealand. Leading offspinners such as Pakistan’s Saeed Ajmal and Sri Lanka’s Sachithra Senanayake have been called in international cricket, while West Indies’ Sunil Narine was reported in the Champions League T20.

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/current/story/789267.html


  28. Bravo, Hinds battle intensifies in email exchange
    Nagraj Gollapudi
    October 15, 2014
    Be the first to comment | Login via | Text size: A | A

    The West Indies bowlers stifled India at the death, India v West Indies, 2nd ODI, Delhi, October 11, 2014
    Dwayne Bravo and the West Indies players have continued to voice their displeasure over a revised pay structure © BCCI
    Enlarge
    Related Links
    Tony Cozier : A painfully familiar crisis
    News : Players call for WICB to intervene, WIPA board to resign
    News : West Indies players mull strike over pay structure
    Players/Officials: Wavell Hinds | Dwayne Bravo
    Teams: West Indies
    The growing impasse between West Indies players and the West Indies Players Association (WIPA) has intensified with both sides exchanging bitter emails in the past week. After Wavell Hinds, who has been the direct target of the players’ ire, vehemently refused to step down from his dual positions as WIPA president and chief executive, the players fired fresh salvos against him via a two-part letter highlighting the discrepancies in his response.

    The biggest bone of contention between the warring factions is related to the issue of sponsorship payment that Hinds claimed all the West Indies players had agreed to forego towards enhancing the pay structure of 90 regional first-class cricketers during the WIPA annual general meeting on February 1 in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad.

    Hinds was responding to a letter signed by West Indies ODI captain Dwayne Bravo on behalf of the players, who alleged that the WIPA CEO had “hoodwinked” them by signing a new memorandum of understanding (MoU) which amounted to taking a massive pay cut.

    The proposal to forego the sponsorship fee was present by WIPA director Michael Hall, who asked of the “players on the West Indies team to be an agent of change and give up his daily sponsorship money to help professionalize first class cricket,” according to the minutes of the AGM as seen by ESPNCricinfo.

    In his letter, dated October 8, Hinds started with a bold stroke: “I am compelled to first refute in the strongest possible manner all of your previous assertions claiming ignorance on the part of the “senior players” regarding the proposal to discontinue the payment of $35,000 per day of cricket for the benefit of members of the senior West Indies team, and the reallocation of these monies to help to fund retainer contracts for an additional ninety (90) members of WIPA.”

    Hinds said Bravo along with senior West Indies players Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Ramnaresh Sarwan having “participated in a lively and lengthy discussion” on the issue had expressed “100% support for the initiative” and authorised the WIPA executive to go forward with the “resolution”. That move, Hinds said, “was passed by majority vote of the members present on the floor. The minutes also reflect the only qualification to your support, which was to ask that the current WIPA executive make every effort to ensure that the shortfall in revenue accruing from the reallocation, be made up in other areas of player remuneration.”

    But Bravo expressed complete surprise that such a resolution was indeed passed, which he noted in the first part of his response, sent on October 10 to Hinds. “There is no mention whatsoever of such a vote taking place and that is in keeping with what persons attending that meeting have said,” Bravo said, referring to the minutes of the meeting as well as having consulted his fellow players present at the AGM.

    Bravo brought to Hinds’ attention the segment in the minutes of the AGM where he had clearly said that “he support(ed) 100% the proposal but certain conditions must be discussed, one of them being no pay drop for the senior team and the other salary be raised to compensate the loss of sponsorship fee.”

    Bravo also pointed out that both Hall and Hinds had said before any final decision was taken WIPA would consult WICB to make sure that “to balance of the loss of sponsorship fee, a compromise MUST be reached to EVEN out the difference.” Hinds and Hall, Bravo said, had made it clear senior players like himself, Chris Gayle, Darren Sammy and Chanderpaul would be kept abreast of the updates. Instead Bravo claimed the players were always in the dark over the MoU, which they are yet to see.

    “As is evident from the minutes of the AGM, Mr. Hinds and Mr. Hall promised to provide more information, meet with senior West Indian players, make up the shortfall if the sponsorship were taken away, even out the difference and certain conditions must be discussed one of them being no pay drop and more importantly discuss with the players before any final decision is made,” Bravo wrote.

    In the second part of his response, sent on October 12, Bravo objected to the fact pointed out by Hinds that under the new agreement with the WICB the players actually stood to earn more. According to Hinds, the players would get 15% increase in their match fee across the board along with a hike in the retainer contracts ranging from 12.5-25%. The Test match fee had been increased from $5000 to $5750; ODI match fee had been hiked to $2300 to $2000 while the Twenty20 International fee was raised to $1725 from $1500.

    Also there were two new contract categories being including from this season: Category A+ and Category B+. An A+ player’s retainer would amount to $150,000; Category A players would get $135,000, compared to $120,000 previously; Category B+ players $125,000; Category B players $115,000, compared to $110,000 previously; and Category C players would get $100,000, an increase of $20,000.

    Bravo said that Hinds’ assertion was “inaccurate.” According to Bravo, the matter was never discussed at the AGM and a perusal of the minutes made that clear.

    “Yet, you inaccurately stated that we got a 300% increase in match fees when the truth is the players are in fact receiving 90% less from what previously existed in our overall fees,” Bravo wrote. Bravo also wondered why the 25% participation fee paid to the players by the WICB for playing in various ICC tournaments was erased completely. “To cut the participation fee from players who play at ICC events from 25% to zero is unbelievable.”

    “Mr. Hinds, we have asked for a comparative analysis of what the players earned last contractual year and what they would earn given this new purported MOU. Instead you have presented figures to signal that WIPA got an increase for the players. This is not correct. We once again call on you to provide this comparison,” Bravo wrote, concluding a third part of his response would be sent soon.


  29. The WICB(C) should be sued by the players, the ICC, the BCCI and be banned from international cricket until this board is removed.


  30. WHEN THIS BOARD IS REMOVED IT WILL ONLY BE REPLACED BY A SIMILAR BOARD——IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN SO

    DO YOU HEAR OF ANY CRICKET TEAM THAT FIGHTS WITH THE BOARD AS THE WEST INDIES TEAM HAS DONE OVER THE YEARS?


  31. @Hants

    This was inevitable, the WICB has declared it recognises WIPA as the bargaining agent, the players have publicly expressed no confidence in WIPA, an untenable position.


  32. from cricinfo

    “WICB release: “The West Indies Cricket Board advises, that, contrary to media reports, it has taken no decision to discontinue the ongoing tour to India. The WICB will make a further statement following the conclusion of the Fourth One Day International which is in progress.”


  33. @Hants

    What it means is that the WICB is preparing itself to send another team, now you understand Tino’s response…lol.


  34. When we said the Board should be removed we were talking about its replacement consistent with the ideas of Rawle Branker. Ideas we have supported for years, here and elsewhere. We always talk about RADICAL transformation of everything!


  35. If memory serves Branker’s postion is based on creating a public company giving West Indians the right to buyin and management of a West Indies cricket.

    On Friday, 17 October 2014, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  36. @ Pachamama | October 17, 2014 at 11:05 AM |

    What is your opinion based on? The players and their union have a dispute and you blame the WICB? .


  37. Of course you have to blame the WICB because the discord playing out on the world stage to the embarrassment of cricket loving West Indians everywhere is symptomatic of a bigger issue that falls within the domain of the Board.


  38. @ David | October 17, 2014 at 4:20 PM |

    Previous disputes between the WICB and WIPA ended up in the law courts, so why would the WICB jump into a dispute between WIPA and the players without having all the facts. I’m as concerned and hurt as any West Indian, but I can’t honest tell you that the WICB could have done anything more than ask the players to finish the tour and trash out the matter after returning home.
    Can anyone state if the issues raised by the players were know before they
    traveled to India?


  39. This overall behavior brands this team as malcontents who refuse to follow the laws and rudimentary industrial practicalities. It badly damages the brand that is W.I. cricket and displays very myopic thinking.

    This is the worst type of industrial action possible…in trying to prove your case you so badly damage your brand as to irrevocably reduce its future viability and earning power.

    Remarkably enough Mr. Bravo is all in vexation over contract terms with WICB and then proceeded to initiate an action which broke contractual obligations with a far more powerful third party. How does that make business sense. Certainly they will be hauled into the courts.

    These brethren have lost all semblance of common-sense and reason.
    This is an insane, self-destructive act and I am annoyed that it happened. I completely dismiss these players for this asinine public posturing that resolves not one iota and also dismiss the absolute poor judgment of the WICB to allow the impasse to reach this point.


  40. @Dee Word

    Given the state of West Indies cricket something needs to happen to force a radical change in thinking. It is obvious the path we have been following for the last 20 years has not been working.


  41. Yes @David change is needed I agree. But sensible people understand that the process of change is often as important as the change itself. On the evidence of the last 10 years specifically and generally the last 20 the WI cricket fraternity of players and administrators have acted too cavalier and disrespectful towards each other and thus there is a blighted sense of achievement over any the positives gained. Their change process is certainly not a best practice model.

    Let me put it another way:

    Overall, there’s a positive sense of achievement re the Clive Lloyd and Sir Viv’s tenures. Of course there were issues of disquiet and upheavals re monies, contract matters, representation etc. but the players for the most part kept the issues in-house and did not embarrass themselves or the spirit of WI cricket.

    We remember that time for the highs and lows on the FIELD; not in the board room. World Cup in ’75, WI bashed in ’76 (Australia), WI bashing England for a few 5-0 results, WI supremacy over all others from late 70’s for 10+ years.

    Brian Lara scored over 900 runs in two innings in this 20 year span…absolute genius. But my mental picture of his team includes a bad image of disrespect to Nelson Mandela. Privileged talented young-men who did not have any life altering hardships because of the color of their skin thought it prudent to use THAT tour and the absolute euphoria surrounding SA most renowned citizen to press their base claims.

    I didn’t grudge them their rights or justification for the cause: that was all good; but I dismiss their lack of self-worth and respect for the person and an occasion that was well beyond a few dirty ‘pieces of silver’.

    I don’t cherish their positives.

    Of course it seems practical to work diligently to put out a fire if our house is burning; you don’t fan the flames because you are pissed-off and see an opportunity to get the occupants with whom you are in dispute out the door. Let the law and course of time move you to a resolution, difficult though that may be. Cherish the house and retain it in the best condition for eventual take over.

    But life’s funny and not always practical is it… because when you have the means to buy another house you are less interested in preserving the one in dispute. You spite your adversary so much that you no longer care if that house turns to ash.

    A harsh analogy, you say, but is it. Somebodies for a long time seem hell-bent to diminish the lovely edifice that is WI cricket.

    It’s comical that we protected and saved the house against colonial racism practices, the 2 bumper rules, reduced county contracts, distorted revenue sharing terms in the days when our teams generated top dollar etc.

    And now joke of all jokes we are burning down the house ourselves.


  42. […] The following extracted from the blog  The WICB(C) Conspires Against Our International Players, Again! posted by commenter Dee Word […]


  43. @ GP,
    We got your man! Ottis Gibson to make England return at winter fast-bowling camp

    http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/oct/29/ottis-gibson-england-bowling-kevin-shine

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading