Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Senator Darcy Boyce, Minister of Energy
Senator Darcy Boyce, Minister of Energy

The Fair Trading Commission (FTC) recently ruled on the motion for review of the billing arrangement and metering option of the Renewable Energy Rider  (RER) – see FTC Order and Decision . The RER is a mechanism established by government to facilitate the sale of surplus electricity to the grid supplied by customers with Renewable Energy (RE)  systems.

The government of Barbados has committed to facilitate the RE sector as part of sustaining a new economy not overly dependent on traditional economic drivers. The growing energy bill of Barbados and dependence on fossil fuel is a concern. An important strategy therefore is to ensure the legislative and regulatory framework is expertly (sensibly) designed to encourage enthusiastic adoption of RE solutions. Key to a successful RE penetration is aggressive participation by RE providers and confidence by end consumers to embrace RE as a top of mind solution to satisfy energy needs.

For those who have been following the emergence of the local RE sector still at a nascent stage of development, several concerns have been raised by the early adopters.  The most recent FTC hearing attracted submissions from CARITEL, Sir Allan Fields, Dick Stoute, Williams Industries, Solar Watt Systems and John Haywards. Visibly absent from the process was a consumer organization.  Unfortunately the iterations embedded in the RER ‘decisioning’ process is bound up in technical language which the average Barbadian is inclined to leave to the experts to unravel. There is however a basic level of interest and participation all Barbadians should show as it pertains to the development of a national RE program.  We are after all described as an educated and literate group of people.

Of the several issues associated with Barbados’ RE program at the top of the heap as far as BU is concerned, is the role of the Barbados Light & Power (BL&P) in the process. It appears to many BL&P has been able to influence the regulatory process, we can debate if deliberately or otherwise. If one listens to those who should know, the FTC has been guided in its ruling by the capacity of BL&P to ‘safely’ absorb intermittent renewable energy into the grid. BU assumes intermittent because there is an element of unpredictability associated with wind and solar as energy sources and because RE generation currently falls outside BL&P’s menu of options to generate electricity.

To quote feedback from an FTC  Commissioner,  “”the limit [intermittent energy] is currently 16MW of which 7MW have currently been reserved for the renewable energy rider – the remainder is available for BL&P and Independent Power Producers (IPP’s) but this is subject to change. There is a study currently underway to determine if the 16MW may be safely increased. The regime for IPP’s has not yet been finalized by government”. The additional point was stated that the new Electricity Light & Power Act (still to be proclaimed like other pieces of legislation) gives the minister of energy the authority to set limits for the sale of electricity to the grid AFTER consultation with an Advisory Committee, BL&P and the FTC. 

If government spokesperson, in this case Senator Darcy Boyce,  would accept the responsibility to actively engage the public who he is being paid to serve, a lot of the uncertainty and concerns dogging the industry could be allayed. In fairness to Senator Boyce he is on public record declaring that government’s policy is guided by a concern to maintain a stable grid. The question we need the minister of energy to answer is to what extent has the government been aggressive in delineating the issues – in the interest of Barbados – when consulting with the BL&P/EMERA as part of the decision making process.

BU is not apprised of all the RE issues on the table to be definitive in making conclusion but there is a heavy suspicion that a case can be made of the tail wagging the dog. The RE sector is important to a future economy of Barbados and it should be managed as a priority issue and indigenous concerns aggressively encouraged to become heavily vested in the sector.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

68 responses to “Barbados Renewable Energy Program–A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog”


  1. […] Barbados Renewable Energy Program–A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog […]


  2. […] David The Fair Trading Commission (FTC) recently ruled on the motion for review of the billing […]


  3. […] David The Fair Trading Commission (FTC) recently ruled on the motion for review of the billing […]

  4. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    In its 2013 election Manifesto the DLP promised to do the following:

    “Install photovoltaic panels on the majority of government buildings, thereby producing electricity for these buildings and selling the excess to the national electricity grid.”

    “BWA will enter into a phased programme of reducing their reliance on fossil fuel generation by investing in one of the proposed 1MW Solar Farms that the BL&P intends to propose to the FTC by the end of the first quarter 2013.”

    What implications do the above proposals have on the cost of electricity for those remaining on the grid and the setting of the RER?
    Would the small consumers who have no choice but to remain on the grid be made to pay higher rates to subsidize the expected inefficiencies arising from higher unit cost from an underutilized fossil fuel-based generating plant?

    Wouldn’t the proposal to sell excess electricity generated during the day on government-owned buildings result in the ‘crowding out’ of the smaller players in the budding RE industry given the cap placed on the amount of renewable energy non-BL&P providers can sell to the national grid?


  5. “Of the several issues associated with Barbados’ RE program at the top of the heap as far as BU is concerned, is the role of the Barbados Light & Power (BL&P) in the process. It appears to many BL&P has been able to influence the regulatory process, we can debate if deliberately or otherwise..”

    In your last sentence, containing,”It appears!”, should be replaced with, “It is fact!”
    Take note that every meeting /conference, the speaker for BL+P is present. This is not by chance, but a deliberate act to intimidate. One has to guard his/her words. Favours can come easily or it can be made difficult.(This is what one can expect when a MONOPOLY is given free reign in any country).
    If one can cast his mind back, earlier when the debate was due to be debated in the house, BL+P requested to meet with the ministers. Later, Barbadians learned there was a change of policy.

    We later, the owners of BL+P requested a new contract before the present one expires.
    BL+P are fully aware at the impotence of this and other administration to carry out ‘measures’ in terms of RE, for the good of Barbados. The fear of doing something which may not be favourable to BL+P cannot be imagined.

    It is not in BL+P’s interest to see consumers providing their own electricity, PERIOD! BL+P is concerned about its ability or inability to dictate terms in its interest. Many Bajans are aware of BL+P’s in this regard, so preference is left to those ‘learned’ to fight for the rights of public.

    Senator Darcy Boyce is cognisant of what is needed and the means of going about it.
    Sorry, Senator Boyce cannot act except he has the ,right people’, not necessarily the best, behind him. He is also aware that he is viewed from every angle, knowing pressure can be brought to remove him in favour of someone else who is willing to take firstly BL+P’s guidance on such issues.

  6. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Paradox | September 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM |

    An erudite analysis. Very informative for those who don’t know what really is going on. Emera is calling the shots here.
    You can expect an application for a rate ‘adjustment” in the very near future as Emera seeks to recover its investment in a much truncated time horizon.


  7. Can anyone give us an update on the very old and inefficient turbines installed used by BL&P for power generation?


  8. Emera has to protect the interests of their investors.


  9. I do not understand why Barbados is not a leader in the use of Solar powered electricity.
    Am I missing something ?

    http://www.matrixenergy.ca/stand-alone-systems/autonomous-pv-system-bloorwest.html


  10. Let us formulate and execute an energy policy on the basis that a clean, sustainable and affordable energy source must be considered a strategic asset by a small island state like Barbados.


  11. Just like we need food security we also need Renewable Energy security.

    Solar.


  12. Just beyond your imagination but Barbados is fortunate to have great options.

    Just imagine if all farms used solar energy for lighting and to run the pumps for irrigation.


  13. St.Lucy could be the centre of Organic greenhouse farming in Barbados.
    Solar and wind will supply the power.


  14. Hants……getting the ball rolling without the ministers and their sidekicks turning it into some bribery/scam is the problem.


  15. Minister Lowe SPEAKS!

    Side Event: high stakes and increased opportunities for promoting sustainable consumption and production (SCP)

    Monday, 1 September 1-2:30pm

    Small Island Developing States (SIDS) face a particular set of social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities, which highlight the urgency to shift to more sustainable consumption and production (SCP) patterns.

    The 10YFP Secretariat, hosted by UNEP, is supporting the development of such a platform.

    Panel (L-R): Arab Hoballah, UN Environment Programme (UNEP) Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE); Denis Lowe, Minister of Environment and Drainage, Barbados; Taafua Maluelue, Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Samoa; Davanand Virahsawmy, Minister of Environment, Mauritius; and Achim Steiner, Executive Director, UNEP.

    The side event will brought together representatives from governments, financial institutions and other stakeholders to exchange knowledge and commit to join forces in the promotion of sustainable patterns of consumption and production in the SIDS countries, focusing on tourism, waste and food. 

    http://www.unep.org/wed/SIDS/conference/day1.asp#.VAeYtVPLcy9


  16. David,
    I must congratulate you on a very thought provoking article. You raised all the right questions pertaining to the asymmetrical relationship between the regulator and the regulated .The question is who has market power?

    Utility law/economics/engineering is an interdisciplinary field. Hardly anyone locally and indeed only a few persons internationally understand how these disciplines intersect, especially when it comes to power system modeling. There are some very complex software packages called production cost models, one of which BL&P uses to conduct their studies, to arrive at the conclusions they arrive at, and which they present to the FTC.

    Bl&P engages high powered consultants who are trained to used these models by the very software companies who developed them.The particular production cost model which BL&P has purchased and uses extensively in almost every study is called ‘Plexos.’ They have used it to come up with the avoided cost study (both capacity and energy) for various types of renewable energy. It was used of determine their least cost expansion plan for the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and it is being used for the intermittent penetration/battery storage study currently being conducted.

    Utility regulators worldwide are wary of these models because of their complexity and the ease in which their input assumptions can influence desired outputs. They use them only sparingly and only in instances where long term planning is involved. We use them all the time and believe in them.

    The other matter I wish to comment on pertains to the RER capacity limit of 16 MW that you were told was to be split between the RER community and the independent power producers. This is a nonsense which I have commented on before and which has gathered little or no traction from the renewable energy community who are crying out for capacity.
    Let me explain it again. Yes, there is a 7 MW limit on the RER customers (150 MW or less) which is about to be maxed out. But the remaining 9 MW that was capped is up for grabs and its the players in roof-top developmen that should be agitating to get at least part of it until the results of the intermittent penetration study are made known.

    BL&P has made a grab for 8MW of the remaining 9 MW through their solar plant, but they are not entitled to it, and the FTC should not let them have it because of the Grid Code rules that they both helped establish. Briefly, the new Electric Light and Power Act essentially deregulates electrical power generation and puts BL&P and other Independent Power Producers supposedly on an equal competitive footing. The Grid Code prohibits Independent Power Producers from putting unregulated (intermittent power) on the grid, and requires them to regulate their voltages and frequencies within prescribed limits. The only way this is possible is through battery storage. The same code and requirement should apply to BL&P and their 8 MW solar plant!

    Consequently, if Bl&P and the FTC are true to their mutually agreed grid code, then the 8 MW solar plant should be battery-supported. If this were to happen,It would become at most, firm power and no different from that of their other fossil fuel base-load plants. Or at least, it would be highly regulated in terms of ramp-rates and variability, that it would make no impact to the quality or reliability to the current power system. In any event, that same 8 MW would be available for roof-top development and thereby be supporting a young and promising industry.


  17. @Tony ‘kite’ Gibbs

    Coming from you we will take it as a huge complement. Of course BU tries to simplify the issues of a sector pregnant with terms of arts.

  18. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    David;

    It might not really be a case of the tail wagging the dog. It might be more a case of Govt showing its gratitude to BL&P / Emera for the assistance rendered early last year in providing a significant bolster to our foreign exchange situation which, inter alia, might have staved off an immanent and imminent FX collapse and allowed for the MoF and its creatures to somewhat believably prolong its protestations of a stable economy until circumstances rendered that stance impossible to maintain.

    The current protestation is that the Government would be less than prudent if it set a target for the overall percentage input in renewable energy that compromised the production of reliable electricity from the grid and so it must wait until all the studies are done (and BL&P has taken up the bulk of the renewable energy allotment). But, is’nt it BL&P which can call all the shots in that regard, provide practically all the important analyses (I saw a table which looked flawed in the recent decision) and make the investment decisions that could either lead to a deterioration or enhancement of its services based on any target which the FTC sets? And of course the lower the target for its small competitors the better for them.

    But I am almost certain that the Solar PV providers have cogent counter arguments which suggest that a good corporate traditional large fossil fuel based energy provider could coexist comfortably with small residential providers producing significantly greater cogeneration of solar or wind electricity than is guaranteed by the now new target of 7 mw, much of which will be taken up by BL&P companies. I hope that Solar watt or Innogen or one of the other providers would present such arguments in this forum.

    What is interesting is that larger targets for the small renewable energy producers seem to be much more in concert with Government’s vaunted plans for development of energy in Barbados than the continued reliance on a big fossil based system which is suggested in the small domestic targets set. But I suspect this is just one more variance, perhaps because of necessity, from what Government might wish to do and what it has, of necessity, to do.

    It this regard I think the Government is between a rock and a hard place.


  19. @Are-we-there-yet

    Based on Gibb’s post you have to add incompetence to the list.


  20. The sad part about all of this is that an “emerging” industry with so much financial and environmental potential will remain strangled primarily because of corporate / political interest. We may very well find ourselves playing catch up again.


  21. @Observing(…)

    Good point, a read of many comments on blogs and a listen to talk shows tell the sorry tale. We have become so focused on the political personalities that we can’t get anything.

  22. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    Observing and David;

    I think you’ve hit on the real problem. The blundering, slow decision making that ensures that eventually only unprogressive expedient paths can be taken constrains proper development. The cost is much greater than it might appear at first blush.

    I think the system is bad but that the current self seeking personalities working in the system will poison our development on all fronts, well into the future.

    The current people must remove themselves or be removed for Barbados to start getting out of the morass it is in.


  23. Barbados is currently run , at all levels, by a collection of jokers who are so piss poor that it is no wonder that a few good women are being forced into leadership in all areas.

    Even when EVERYONE agrees that a green revolution is the ONLY viable option for our energy future, ….NO ONE seems capable of articulating and initiating a sensible way forward.
    Government makes so much off the importation of oil through its questionable connections, that greening will actually cause a hit on their income……Same shiite with the (excessive) importation of (large and inefficient) vehicles.
    Emera’s interests are wider than Barbados’ …and indeed may NOT coincide….

    Even the alternative energy suppliers are a bunch of jokers who seem to have fallen victim to a line of thinking that their business DEPENDS on the goodwill of the FTC or the power company.

    What a pathetic place……


  24. Minister Donville Inniss is quoted in the news today that the government will not take any decisions to compromise BL&P’s power generation. Isn’t it the independent regulator responsible for determining intermittent supply? That is until the New Electricity Bill is operationalized? Minister who is driving the numbers being tossed about, the government, FTC or BL&P? What is the plan to protect the nascent RE sector?


  25. I understand that if you go completely off the grid and later want to get back on you will not be allowed to. That is madness and should be challenged. The fuel charge is suspect and we have no way to prove that we are being robbed. RE will reduce the use of fossil fuel and reduces the cost of energy why put a cap on the number of persons who wish to to go that way. Is the government really serious about RE? We need to reduce our fossil fuel dependency and reduce our import bill. Barbados should have been trail blazers in Solar technology but like everything else people hold onto the outdated technology and feel that they have the key to wealth while newer technology is out there making inroads. SMH we are doomed because of lack of vision.


  26. Off topic; but sort of a related topic.

    In a March 2014 press release, Clare Cowan, CEO of Cahill Energy, commented: “Cahill Energy began exploring Waste to Energy in 2011 and our attention was directed towards the Caribbean by 7th Heaven Properties. While we recognise the country faces some short-term challenges due to the impact of the global economic downturn, we believe the fundamentals are strong. We are therefore confident that this investment represents a phenomenal business opportunity for our investors and offers even greater benefits to the people of Barbados.”

    The announcement further said “Barbados has signed on with Cahill Energy to build and operate a gasification waste to energy facility in the island.

    Making this announcement in the House of Assembly yesterday, Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler said the plant would be based in Vaucluse, St. Thomas.

    “A major international energy company out of Canada is proposing and will invest in Barbados a minimum of US$240 million with the potential to rise to US$340 million and it portends massive spin-offs for this local economy. Indeed, coming at a time when the country has seen a softening of its foreign direct investment inflows for the last two years it is a much welcome investment of foreign exchange into the Barbadian economy over the next three years,” he revealed.

    Meanwhile, Dr. Denis S. Lowe, Minister of Environment was reported as saying: “Cahill Energy offers us a real solution to becoming energy independent, while at the same time reducing our massive oil import bill. Cahill Energy has brought a Waste to Energy option to the Government of Barbados that is far superior to any other we have examined. We believe that our country will be changed forever as a result.”
    It is close to six months since the announcements by the MOF and MOE, and nothing but silence on the matter since.

    Has anyone heard anything lately about the much ballyhooed Cahill Energy WTE project.

    Just visited http://www.cahill-energy.com.

    Nothing new. Same old PR Fluff from March and April.

    No names of Officers and Directors. No financial information. No address, no telephone number, no email address.

    No investors?

    No WTE plant?


  27. @ are-we-there-yet

    “It might be more a case of Govt showing its gratitude to BL&P / Emera for the assistance rendered early last year in providing a significant bolster to our foreign exchange situation which, inter alia, might have staved off an immanent and imminent FX collapse and allowed for the MoF and its creatures to somewhat believably prolong its protestations of a stable economy until circumstances rendered that stance impossible to maintain.”

    This whole energy issue is way to complex for DD; BUT you got that right.


  28. islandgal246 wrote “I understand that if you go completely off the grid and later want to get back on you will not be allowed to.”

    I don’t think that is true. You will have to get the wiring inspected just as if you had built a new house.

    The BU Lawyers and Electrical engineers can verify.


  29. @DD

    Based on the discussion at the Open House or Town Hall held at St. Thomas Church – whatever you want to call it to get around T&P rules – several weeks ago the Environmemtal Impact Study should have been available for public viewing by now. Always delays, always secrecy, always inefficiency, always waiting on Denis Lowe to open his mouth to address the electorate.


  30. islandgal246 wrote “I understand that if you go completely off the grid and later want to get back on you will not be allowed to.”

    I don’t think that is true. You will have to get the wiring inspected just as if you had built a new house.

    The BU Lawyers and Electrical engineers can verify.
    …………………………………………………………………………..
    IG246 is correct re the above,as 15 years ago I was told that by the engineer,when looking to set up a wind turbine in the Scotland District for a youth project.


  31. IslandGal246 wrote “That is madness and should be challenged.|”

    I agree.

    If I was renovating a house and had the power shut off for a few months would they tell me I could not get electricity again?

    This would be a good story for the Toronto Star.
    CANADIAN POWER COMPANY refuses to supply power because building was powered by Solar electricity.


  32. David

    “always waiting on Denis Lowe to open his mouth to address the electorate.”

    Guess we have to wait for Lowe to get back from his trip to drink some SUDS with the SIDS.


  33. @islandgal
    re. paying to reconnect

    I’ve heard so myself. Therein lies the whole turn off for the average consumer.

    Renewable energy is probably the best thing since choice bread and cheese, yet we are here poo pooing with it. A brilliant chance for an alternative industry, manufacturing exports, reduction in forex expenses, a direct and clear push to a greener economy and lower fuel dependency, potential inter twinning with education and training for a country that sees sun 90% of the year and is actually the pioneer in worldwide solar use….but, this is here we end up.

    I would be laughing my backside off if I were observing from far far and away.


  34. Maybe the Canadians can chip in here:

    We are energy.

    Nova Scotia is going through an energy transformation—a fundamental shift toward cleaner, more reliable electricity.

    For Emera this means seeking new ways to make electricity—a transformation that will shift all of us together towards a new era of stability in supply and prices, stewardship of our natural resources, and regional prosperity.

    The Maritime Link Project is the lowest long-term cost option to access a renewable, stable source of energy that will help to make prices more predictable, ensure an autonomous regional power source, and reduce greenhouse gases and air pollutants.

    http://www.weareenergy.ca/home/

  35. St George's Dragon Avatar
    St George’s Dragon

    @ Island Girl
    “I understand that if you go completely off the grid and later want to get back on you will not be allowed to.”
    That cannot be correct. If you have a GEED inspection certificate, it may be that they will want to check again, but I don’t see why they should.
    “…….why put a cap on the number of persons who wish to to go that way. Is the government really serious about RE?”
    There is actually sound reasoning why BL&P needs a cap. In essence, it is difficult to keep 110 volts and 50 Hz consistently if you have too much intermittent supply feeding into the grid. RE is intermittent as it can cut out when the sun goes in. Generators don’t do that. The real question is why did BL&P tell us they needed to cap RE at 7 MW, when it now turns out they “allocated” another 8 MW of RE to themselves?
    The cap, though, is only for grid-tied installations, so those that buy power from BL&P during the night and sell power to the grid in the day when they are generating their own power. Anyone can set up their own stand-alone non-grid-tied installation. The problem is that it is expensive as it needs batteries – potentially $10,000 more than a grid-tied system.

  36. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    Bush tea

    You said:
    “Even the alternative energy suppliers are a bunch of jokers who seem to have fallen victim to a line of thinking that their business DEPENDS on the goodwill of the FTC or the power company.”

    On the face of it, most will argue that you are wrong. After all the costs of the off-grid system far outweigh the costs of a grid tied as even even though the costs of the panels have been plummeting over the past few years the cost of the batteries to store the energy for nights and periods of rainy weather have been remaining relatively static.

    Yes, the alternative energy suppliers do behave as if their existence depends on the FTC rider and BL&P casting a few crumbs to them but is there an alternative?

    You caused me to wonder if there could be a way out of this quandary and I think there is. When the household usage of grid-tied electricity reaches whatever limits the FTC sets eventually as they cater to the BL&P wishes. The alt energy suppliers should have worked out a strategy to switch to cogeneration systems that utilise off grid PV and / or wind generators (eg 1 kwh systems) that store energy in state of the art battery systems that utilize super conductor technology (borrow the technology from the RE cars).

    1kwh can go a long way to power the TV and Lights and Fans and small electronic items in a typical middle income house and be available for emergency situations like hurricanes, riots, etc. Such systems should not be sneezed at. Fridges and washing machines can be powered from the grid. There would be a minimum of grid tied systems in Barbados with such a strategy.

    The strategy could be:-

    Get buy-in by relevant agencies to provide funding for on-lending to consumers to install off grid 1 kwh systems which could provide 4 to 4.5 kwh/day or 120 kwh/month in Barbados. There would be no interfering with the grid, just reduced usage of it as people utilize more energy from the sun. BL&P and the RE suppliers could theoretically coexist. The economics might not be as bad as it currently appears.

    Let the association of RE suppliers improve their lobbying skills

    Get buy-in from UWI to keep in tune with the latest technology. Lithium batteries are coming down in cost. Use of superconductors is a future technology that UWI should be researching and getting ready to pounce on. There should be an enhanced purposeful RE programme at UWI to support such a thrust.

    Let Government know that they can’t stop people from using or investing in the sun if we are not tied to BL&P’s grid through lobbyists and other means. THis might mean ensuring professionals only are involved in the programme.

    ID sources of good reconditioned deep cycle batteries that could last 5 years or so.

    There could be comparable buy-in to 1 kwh RE systems as happened with the Solar heating systems that populate most bajan roofs.

    If Government persist in bringing new laws to strangle such initiatives, keep a step ahead of them and organize that they would get to know which God they serve. The God of the people or the God of filthy mammon.

    It needs some more work but I think it can work.

    Discuss

  37. Lincoln Carrington Harper Avatar
    Lincoln Carrington Harper

    David:

    I have become more and more hesitant in reading your blogs because of their mind-boggling effect. I suppose that you can claim that the way of the blog master is as hard as is the way of the transgressor. However, while in well-ordered societies sanctions can be imposed to curb extreme transgressions I am not sure that similar corrective pressure can be placed effectively on you.

    In attempting to present the issues to an otherwise ignorant audience you state:
    “The question we need the minister of energy to answer is to what extent has the government been aggressive in delineating the issues – in the interest of Barbados – when consulting with the BL&P/EMERA as part of the decision making process.

    BU is not apprised of all the RE issues on the table to be definitive in making conclusion but there is a heavy suspicion that a case can be made of the tail wagging the dog. The RE sector is important to a future economy of Barbados and it should be managed as a priority issue and indigenous concerns aggressively encouraged to become heavily vested in the sector.”

    My problem is that as an ignorant and uninformed observer, you have not assisted me in getting a grasp of those important issues to which you allude.And yet, you jump on your red herring and ride off into the sunset looking for tails that are wagging dogs. I hope that you will find a solution, even if your dog does not bark, or like Sherlock Homes, precisely because it did not!!

    But back to your contributors. While they have shown their usual penchant for sidetracking, some like Tony “Kite” Gibbs have alerted me to the skewed relationship between the regulator and the regulated. This is a classic decision problem which cannot simply be resolved by piling consultants upon consultants or reverting to ever more abstract modelling processes, which may be the forte of engineers like TG.

    What strikes me as completely useless is the well-established tendency of Barbadians, who frequently do not have even a passing acquaintance with the process of governmental decision-making to criticise the efforts of our authorities, simply because they have an axe (political of otherwise) to grind.

    Well, I have used up a lot of energy in my comment, and I have serious doubts that it is renewable!!

  38. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    Lincoln Carrington Harper;

    Beautiful post above in that it contained this absolute gem:-

    “And yet, you jump on your red herring and ride off into the sunset looking for tails that are wagging dogs. I hope that you will find a solution, even if your dog does not bark, or like Sherlock Homes, precisely because it did not!!”

    It is a gem not only because of the beautifully used metaphors but that careful analysis might show that it perhaps identifies some of the dogs that are being wagged by the tail – i.e. could they be high officials in the Ministry of Energy or possibly the environment who, like Sherlock Holmes Hound of the Baskervilles, are also usually silent?

    Beyond that I could find no substantive contribution to this debate by your post.

  39. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    Forgive me, it should have been unusually silent


  40. David
    re We Are Energy

    I repeat my earlier comment “This whole energy issue is way to complex for DD”

    Given that Emera is not a part of DD’s day-to-day life DD is not familiar with its operations (Halifax Nova Scotia is over 1,000 miles from Toronto).

    Emera Inc. is an international energy and services company with roots in Nova Scotia, Canada. Its businesses are working in Canada, the USA and the Caribbean. 

    The http://www.weareenergy.ca website is a PR piece designed the tell the people of Nova Scotia (and elsewhere) what Emera is doing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to meet Canada’s mandate that will require a 50% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030.

    In addition, provincial targets require that 40% of the energy used must come from renewable sources. Right now they are at 17%.

    Today, 59% of Nova Scotia’s electricity is generated from coal, 21% from natural gas, 18% from renewables, like wind, hydro and tidal, and 2% from other sources such as imports.

    The Maritime Link Project is to spearhead the transformation Emera’s electricity generation sources to meet regulations.

    As a matter of interest, the following are from Emera website.

    Emera’s 2013 Annual Report (all 160 pages) is at:
    http://www.snl.com/Cache/1001185549.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&fid=1001185549&T=&iid=4072693

    These (really, really) basic calculations are from numbers taken from page 97.

            Canada - NS  USA - Maine        Caribbean       Total
    

    Total Assets $4,186.9 $1,103.3 $1,022.9 $8,876.8
    47.17% 12.43% 11.52% 100.00%

    Oper’tg Rev $1,334.9 $218.2 $440.6 $2,230.2
    59.86% 9.78% 19.76% 100.00%

    ROA 31.88% 19.78% 43.07% 25.12%

    So, Caribbean assets (Bahamas, Barbados, St. Lucia and Dominica) represent 11.5% of total assets, and Caribbean operating revenue represent 19.7% of total operating revenue. Caribbean Operating Revenue to Assets of 43.1% is more than 70% greater than the 25.1% Total Operating Revenue to Total Assets.

    DD is no financial analyst, but would say this much higher Caribbean revenue to assets ratio would be the result of the “big fish in a small pond” effect. Big international energy company negotiating terms with regulators in small Caribbean states.

    Like Butch negotiating concessions.

    Or, (thanks Lincoln Carrington Harper), “the tail wagging the dog”; but in the cases of the big internationals like Emera and Butch, it is in fact “the dog wagging the tail”

    Like it or not, this is the law of the jungle.


  41. OOPS

    Sorry, the numbers did not line up like I had them in my draft, but hopefully you get the idea.


  42. @ Due Diligence
    LOL
    What was that saying about fools and their money again….?


  43. Heard on the news tonight that the FTC has increased the Domestic MW ceiling to 9 MW. The Installers bargaining body seems to be fairly ecstatic about that. Kudos to David for ventilating the problem. Wonder if in some small way the sentiments expressed here might have played a small part in the consideration of the FTC to meet and swiftly amend the ceiling.

    Lincoln Carrington Harper, what say you?


  44. @ AWTY
    Clearly YOU are not there yet..
    What are you suggesting?
    ..that in the three days since David posted that blog, OUR FTC was able to review the situation, get instructions from politicians,…and make a decision to move the limit too…?

    LOL
    Ha Ha Ha
    Muh belly…..

    Not for shirt!!!

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading