Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Robert Clarke, Vice President of Peoples Empowerment Party, Clement Payne Movement
Nelson Mendela, am ICON!
Nelson Mendela, an ICON!

The lost of Nelson Mandela is a great lost to humanity. Very few people in the history of the world would have been important in changing world opinion. Nelson Mandela was one of those along with Mahatma Ghandi and our beloved Fidel Castro.

In the heyday of the Cuban Revolution in the 1950s, there was only one outstanding humanist besides Nelson Mandela and that was Fidel Castro.

Fidel Castro fought against the corruption of the United States in the Cuban Revolution and for that fight he was arrested, charged and tried. He was sentenced. Castro was sentenced on October 16, 1953 during which he delivered a speech that would be printed under the title of History Will Absolve Me. Castro was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment in the hospital wing of the Model Prison (Presidio Modelo), a relatively comfortable and modern institution on the Isla de Pinos.

Similarly, Nelson Mandela, in fighting for world humanity in the 1950s and specifically for humanity in South Africa, which at the time was governed by an Apartheid Government, was arrested, charged and tried by an all white court; white judge, white prosecutor. During that trial, Nelson Mandela, like Fidel Castro before him, made an important speech. In which he stated “During my lifetime I have dedicated myself to this struggle of the African people. I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

Fidel’s speech on October 16th, 1953 and Nelson Mandela’s speech in 1964 show the humanity of these two great men. One has left us.

During the period of Nelson Mandela’s struggle for the freedom of all South African people which included; Blacks, Coloureds, Indians and Whites, the leading Western Governments including the Presidents of the United States of America from Ronald Reagan to George H. W. Bush agreed on not sanctioning the South African Government and in that way, supported the horrors inflicted by a white Supremist government on all non white persons.

During the early Apartheid days in South Africa, non white South Africans had to be out of the urban areas and return to their townships by 9pm and that position was accepted by among other countries United States of America, France, Germany, Portugal and Spain.

Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison and not a word, not a white government moved to change the system in South Africa to allow all South Africans to be equal.

When Africa erupted in its search for freedom, from the 1960s no white country helped them. But in the 1970s, Cuba was of great assistance to the following countries; The People’s Republic of the Congo, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique and Benin. Cuban technical, educational and medical staff in the tens of thousands were working in even more countries: Algeria (Tindouf), Mozambique, Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Ethiopia, São Tomé and Príncipe,Tanzania, the Congo and Benin. Up to 18,000 students from these countries studied on full Cuban scholarships per year on the island.

The reason for Nelson Mandela’s freedom is the great military assistance in Angola, in its resistance against the government of South Africa with the help of the Cuban military forces and in no small way the assistance by the government of Barbados in allowing Cuban military planes to land at Seawell Airport for refueling on their way to South Africa with Cuban troops to fight against Apartheid and to assist Angola and Namibia.

In the most important military battle of 1987 against apartheid in which the South African Defence Forces (SADF) fought pitched tank and artillery battles with the Angolan army (FAPLA, the People’s Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola) and its Cuban supporters at Cuito Cuanavale the south Africans were defeated. That was the military end of the apartheid regime in South Africa.

Secretly the United States of America Government, the British Government and the French Government among others started to negotiate with the African National Congress:

1. A release of Nelson Mandela from prison

2. A transfer of government by democratic means in which all south Africans will have one vote each. This will ensure that the African majority will take over government and that Nelson Mandela would become President.

But there was an underlying position taken by the United States Government, that Mandela would not be released immediately but will only be released after the dismantling of the nuclear facilities in South Africa. The American Government then, as now cannot understand non-white people having Nuclear weapons on their own soil. It took years to dismantle the nuclear facilities in South Africa, and only after that had been achieved, Nelson Mandela was released from prison.

It is also important to note that after Nelson Mandela became President of South Africa, the first country he visited was Libya, to show his recognition of the financial and military help that Muhammar Ghadaffi had given to the African National Congress during all the years of struggle, then he visited Cuba.

To hear Western countries like the Queen of England, Prime Minister Cameron of England, President Obama of the United, President Holland of France now speaking of the greatness of Nelson Mandela in unbelievable but Western history has always had a way of distorting facts.

To the memory of Nelson Mandela and to the honour of Fidel Castro we of the Peoples Empowerment Party and the Clement Payne Movement of Barbados salute you.

It is hoped that the spirit and decency of Nelson Mandela will circulate around the world and help more people become like him. Go I Peace as you did in War.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

213 responses to “Tribute to Nelson Mandela”


  1. Ideological LEFTIST* have NO COLOUR; they COME in ALL Shades!

    Professing themselves to be wise, they became FOOLS!


  2. Zoe
    Yah Jack ass


  3. The accusations that Mandela was a Communist are also not simply sprung from the imaginations of Tea Partiers. Mandela did not govern as a Communist when he became South Africa’s president, nor did he demonstrate much belief in Communist doctrine, but he was the leader of a national liberation movement seeking allies in his struggle. The Cold War politics, which were the international backdrop of that struggle, pushed Mandela and the ANC to the Communist Party, which Mandela joined shortly before his long jail sentence began.


  4. Calling Mandela a Communist or a terrorist shortly after his death is mean-spirited, but it is a bigger condemnation of the moral blindness of much of U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War than it is a criticism of Mandela. It was American myopia and self-absorption which led us to call Mandela a Communist and a terrorist in our efforts to prop up a collapsing South African apartheid regime. It is a reflection of Mandela’s wisdom, poise and temperament that he was able to see beyond these attacks and build strong relationships between his country and ours.

    the bloggers book


  5. Mandela had to get his friends wherever he could and if Communists supported him why should he turn them away? It wasn’t as if Britain and the USA were rushing to the aid of Black people in Africa. Could he look to Harold Wilson for help? Wilson famously said he wouldn’t invade Rhodesia led by Ian Smith after UDI because the whites were their “kith and kin”.

    The only prisoners that Reagan was interested in was hostages in Lebanon and he authorised the sale of weapons to Iran through Israel in the hopes that it would lead to their release (see how the world works Zoe?) Reagan and Thatcher were against sanctions because “it would hurt the poor people’ as if they weren’t hurting enough under apartheid.


  6. Thus, referring to Mandela as a Communist and terrorist is not simply an angry ad hominem attack, although it may be that as well. These comments are also a good reminder of both the world in which Mandela operated as well as the extent to which Cold War politics and colonial attitudes framed many western views of Mandela. Mandela is a hero now, but for much of his life the U.S. and our allies were not on his side. This too should be remembered when we celebrate his amazing life.

    the blogger


  7. I break my silence with this quotation from Vidya Bhushan Rawat is a social and human rights activist

    “Mandela is gone. It is essential that we do not ‘deify’ him. Let there be a critical analysis of his legacy so that the movement that he launched is not stuck in the din of ‘forgiveness’ forever.”

    .


  8. ” Amidst this pouring grief is another gimmickry of the western powers who are now canonizing Nelson Mandela today for their own benefits and ignoring their vast track record of violation of human rights of the people in Africa and elsewhere”


  9. @ ac
    …from the recent writings we see that the huzzy is home from Arizona for the holidays….
    Happy Holidays…..
    Don’t over do… 🙂


  10. “Though, it is not that Mandela changed according to western framework yet the influence was visible in the later years. Perhaps when you participate in power structure it coopt you. Mandela became a ‘statesman’ without fulfilling his party’s agenda. The blacks of South Africa still revere him yet the reality is that the ‘freedom’ has not got them much except the ‘political participation’. Is it not irony that when people seek justice they are fired and killed by the police?”


  11. @ ac
    …from the recent writings we see that the huzzy is home from Arizona for the holidays….
    Happy Holidays…..
    Don’t over do… ”

    Bushie I join with you in expressing seasons greetings to AC . hopefully we will get some peace as her husband tries to get his piece.


  12. Regarding Mandela’s relationship with Castro et al we should all remember the old saying, ” the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. Mandela required some form of assistance from wherever, because having won the War he could then decide on the nature of the relationship going forward.

    Would any of us in a desperate situation refuse help from a criminal if our lives depended on it???


  13. then one can assume that in that situation one hand was trying to wash the other except that Nelson Mandella had the vision and forsight to see and discern that the “end justify the means” also knowing that comrade Cuba was being backed and influence by Russia Mandella must have thought about this. No surprise that he boldy reach out to his enemies calling them his freinds as he must have understood the rationale and reasoning behind castro and Russia support as friends when others did not


  14. @ David (BU)

    Here’s a piece by a noted CATHOLIC magazine! It’s objectification and characterization of MADIBA is rather interesting.

    Nelson Mandela: A Candid Assessment (CRISIS MAGAZINE) by Timothy J. Williams

    Calling him one of the “most influential, courageous and profoundly good people to ever have lived,” President Obama ordered all U.S. flags lowered to half-staff in honor of Nelson Mandela, who died on Thursday, December 5. As the worldwide tributes pour in for the former leader of the African National Congress (ANC) and first black president of South Africa, it is good to remember just who Mandela was, and who he wasn’t.

    As president of South Africa, Mandela—though a typically bumbling socialist—was not a vengeful character. After having spent much of his adult life in prison, he is widely praised for not seeking to retaliate against the former white rulers, and for having largely urged reconciliation and compromise in undoing the injustices of Apartheid.

    Though Mandela was a committed Marxist, he was also a pragmatist, disappointing his more impatient comrades by not immediately carrying out the massive nationalizations of industry he had promised, so as not to drive away foreign investment. And he recognized his own limitations, both physical and political, in deciding not to attempt to remain in power after his term in office.

    Most white South Africans rejoin that Nelson Mandela had no reason to seek revenge on anyone, nor any basis for extending forgiveness to his previous jailors. After all, as the most famous prisoner of the previous Apartheid government, he had been fairly tried and convicted of complicity in many murders, and he confessed to participation in 156 acts of terror, crimes that would certainly have earned him the death penalty in a great many countries. Moreover, his confinement was more than comfortable by any standards. During his legendary twenty-seven years in prison, Mandela communicated freely with his followers, and somehow managed to accumulate a considerable fortune. He was continually offered release by the white Apartheid government, but on one condition: that he renounce violence in pursuit of political reform. That is something he consistently refused to do.

    As was made clear by testimony before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Mandela was personally involved in the targeting and timing of terrorist bombings that took place during his imprisonment, such as the infamous “Church Street Massacre,” designed to maximize casualties among Afrikaner women and children. Even a group as left-leaning as Amnesty International refused to grant Mandela political prisoner status because of the obviously violent character of his ideology and his actions. His African National Congress party ran a horrific camp for political prisoners in Angola, with daily torture and murder, often by the “necklacing” technique, whereby a gasoline-filled tire is placed around the neck of a victim and set ablaze. Virtually all the victims of this particular horror were blacks.

    Within South Africa, on direct orders from Winnie and Nelson Mandela, the ANC targeted not only whites, but also all black civil servants, teachers, lawyers, and businessmen—essentially anyone who imagined a post-Apartheid South Africa that differed from the one mandated by the Marxist ANC. Even simple black peasants who refused to carry out terror attacks were treated as enemies, and they were killed in large numbers. Thus, just as the terroristic FLN killed far more Algerians than did the French during the Algerian war for independence, the ANC was the leading cause of death, by far, for black South Africans throughout the period of Apartheid.

    The only reality that makes it even remotely possible to view Mandela as a “statesman” is that he lived on a continent where the definition of “statecraft” is not exactly rigorous or exemplary. Since the wave of decolonization following World War II, the number of African states ruled by ruthless dictators has always been in the majority, and sometimes approached unanimity. The precise number of tyrants involved is actually difficult to ascertain. One simply loses count, and the shadows of the worst of them conceal the merely “semi-heinous” crimes of the lesser despots, so that their names are eclipsed and you find yourself asking: “Does so-and-so really fit the African definition of a tyrant?”

    Numbered among the rogue gallery of miscreants who have wielded power on that tragic continent, we find some of the world’s biggest drug traffickers, diamond smugglers, and slave traders. It seems that the poorer an African nation is, the greater the wealth accumulated by its “President for Life.” Almost every country in black-ruled Africa has a system of gulags. All elections are rigged, free press is non-existent, and all dissent comes from exiles. In the past fifty years, there have been more wars in Africa than in all the other continents combined. And everything is considered a weapon of war: ethnic cleansing, child soldiering and child rape, even cannibalism. Just refraining from committing genocide in Africa practically sets one up for comparison with Mother Theresa.

    So in this regard, Mandela (post-Apartheid, at least) does indeed look pretty good. Though personally implicated in a great many murders, there is at least no record of him ever eating a political foe or advocating child rape or promoting genocide. And he left office voluntarily in 1999, even if this was due more to advancing years, frail health, and the realization that he had no talent for governing, rather than to a real commitment to democracy. Still, by African standards, this is the stuff of a Nobel Peace Prize.

    Mandela did, however, leave behind another socialist nightmare in the making. With their motto of “liberation before education,” the ANC has proved itself completely incapable of governing, and South Africa is sliding into chaos at an alarming rate. Since 2004, South Africa has experienced almost constant political protests, many of them violent. Activists like to refer to the nation as the most “protest-rich in the world,” which, along with prison camps, is the only type of “riches” a socialist nation can produce. The nation is staggered by unemployment, corruption throughout all levels of the police, military, and civil service, and ubiquitous, inescapable crime. Life in South Africa is far more dangerous, especially for blacks and women, than it was under Apartheid. With about fifty murders a day, the nation is now among the undisputed murder capitals of the world, most of these crimes going uninvestigated. The astounding estimates of other violent crimes, including rape, are almost impossible to believe. But only the truth of such figures could account for the fact that the private security business in South Africa is the largest in the world, with over a quarter-million private security guards in a nation of under 53 million.

    Taking their lead from the disaster in neighboring Zimbabwe, the government of South Africa is now looking the other way as white farmers are driven off their land by arson and murder. It is said that job advertisements, even those posted by the government, routinely include the phrase “Whites need not apply.” Would it be an exaggeration to say that a “reverse Apartheid” is taking place in South Africa? The nearly one million white South Africans who have fled the growing chaos don’t think so.

    Of course, life in South Africa is now most dangerous for the most defenseless, for those waiting to be born. As president, Mandela—ever the pragmatist—signed the most liberal abortion law in all of Africa, with no reason at all needed for a woman to procure abortion in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, and abortion easy to obtain through all nine months. Since this law took effect in 1997, even the most conservative estimates put the number of abortions that have taken place at one million. Once again, socialists and pragmatists of all stripes reveal that they cannot conceive of any form of good governance that does not involve killing on a massive scale.

    Yes, some South Africans view Mandela as a nearly messianic figure. Desmond Tutu has publically thanked God for the “gift” of Mandela. But this is the same “bishop” Tutu who recently stated that he would decline his own invitation to heaven if God turned out to be a “homophobe.” Any pious invocation by Tutu has to be regarded as more than a little suspect. Nor can we have any confidence in Barack Obama when he declares that Mandela “achieved more than could be expected of any man” and that “he belongs to the ages.” Obama no doubt believes he himself “belongs to the ages,” since his signature “accomplishments”—the government seizure of medical care, the enthronement of abortion, and the promotion of homosexual “marriage”—are all policies promoted by the ANC in the new South Africa. So we should not expect to hear much from the Obama administration about Mandela’s violent past. Statists never find anything to reproach in one of their own.

    INTERESTING INDEED!


  15. ac sound different …!


  16. Interesting article, a case of the end justifying the means. We just need to apply to Robert Mugabe.

  17. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Interesting? Sounds more like a hodgepodge of Racist, Christian Right, Republican talking points to me.


  18. @ ANON
    This is exactly the kind of analysis that one would expect from the typical white bigot (as we saw with Zoe for example).

    Why the hell should Mandela have been a saint? …..why should a black man who grew up to see his kith and kin treated like dogs by whites not have IMMENSE hatred in his heart?
    Why should a man (lawyer) finding himself helpless to bring justice to his people not lash out at the exemplification of evil that was represented by apartheid?
    Shiite man….. If it was Bushie back there – some white boys would have had to die too…. Wuh even MOSES, raised as an Egyptian prince, was moved to kill a fella who he found taking advantage of a poor slave….

    Here is the important test….WHEN MANDELA HAD THE POWER TO LEGALLY EXACT REVENGE…..he did what few white men have ever done….
    HE REACHED OUT IN FORGIVENESS.

    but here is Bushie’s point…..Mandela is NOT so special in that regard…. Numerous black leaders did exactly the same….from the same Mugabe that they now hate – to our own EWB…

    Not only forgive them….BUT LET THEM KEEP THEIR ILL BEGOTTEN RICHES………..Now THAT is special.

    …can’t promise that Bushie would have been so generous. The bushman would have forgiven them, tried them in a court of law, and then hanged every last one of them….
    ……assuming of course that those Afrikaners had done unto the blacks as they would have wanted Bushie to do unto them….they would have been SURELY obliged.

    …but then …Bushie don’t want to be no knight of no damn Malta 🙂


  19. bt

    dont hang a soul.

    shoot them in shoulders elbows wrists knees hips and ankles

    then put them in a cold dungeon for life

    osteoarthritis for life! and in multiple locations


  20. @ The bushman

    “Here is the important test….WHEN MANDELA HAD THE POWER TO LEGALLY EXACT REVENGE…..he did what few white men have ever done….HE REACHED OUT IN FORGIVENESS.”

    Every word you so eloquently spat out cannot be contested!

    “he did what few white men have ever done…”

    SADLY, no white man has ever been where MADIBA was then!

    Human beings have been killing through wars and genocide since time immemorial – what is regrettable is that the contorted issue of race has created a form of polarization that pits brother against brother and ethnic group against ethnic group.

    No one wins in this war – what we have to do is take the best and discard the rest!

    MADIBA* never sought to impress even his enemies – but he succeeded in making himself hard to forget!


  21. A Dissenting Opinion on Nelson MandelaBy Jonathan Cook
    copied from http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37033.htm
    December 07, 2013 “Information Clearing House –  What I am going to write here will doubtless make me unpopular with some readers, even if only because they will assume that what follows about Nelson Mandela is disrespectful. It is not.
    So let me start by recognizing Mandela’s huge achievement in helping to bring down South African apartheid, and make clear my enormous respect for the great personal sacrifices he made, including spending so many years caged up for his part in the struggle to liberate his people. These are things impossible to forget or ignore when assessing someone’s life.
    Nonetheless it is important to pause during the general acclamation of his legacy, mostly by people who have never demonstrated a fraction of his integrity, to consider a lesson that most observers want to overlook.


  22. Is Zoe zionist?


  23. i believe that cook has thrown too much curry into the stew, the celebration of Mandella life is not what he didn’t do to stand up against the tyranny of corporate masqueraders, but his active and forceful approach in freeing his people from apartheid governance that denied them every possible human right to equality and justice, that is why Madella is being hailed as a hero today He will be remembered and respected as a Freedom fighter.. as Madella might have made up his mind that was enough of a role for one man to undertake and fighting the forces of empirical tyranny should be left up to the masses worldwide,.


  24. No
    Zoe is no Zionist, ….he is an exegesonist
    LOL 🙂


  25. this quote is for Zoe another great freedom fighter ST>PAUL1 cor. 9:19-23

    19 Though I am free and belong to no one, I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20 To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21 To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. 23 I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings


  26. “Though, it is not that Mandela changed according to western framework yet the influence was visible in the later years. Perhaps when you participate in power structure it coopt you. Mandela became a ‘statesman’ without fulfilling his party’s agenda. The blacks of South Africa still revere him yet the reality is that the ‘freedom’ has not got them much except the ‘political participation’. Is it not irony that when people seek justice they are fired and killed by the police?

    In the new set-up of Africa when Mandela was being canonized and glorified to maximum hiding the western hypocrisy and double standard about human rights and democracy, the person who stood with him and took his battle further in his absence, his partner Winnie was villainised. In a revealing interview to Nadira Naipaul, in March 2010, she said, ‘

    “This name Mandela is an albatross around the necks of my family. You all must realise that Mandela was not the only man who suffered. There were many others, hundreds who languished in prison and died. Many unsung and unknown heroes of the struggle, and there were others in the leadership too, like poor Steve Biko, who died of the beatings, horribly all alone. Mandela did go to prison and he went in there as a burning young revolutionary. But look what came out,” she said, looking to the writer. He said nothing but listened.

    It is hard to knock a living legend. Only a wife, a lover or a mistress has that privilege. Only they are privy to the intimate inner man, I thought.

    “Mandela let us down. He agreed to a bad deal for the blacks. Economically, we are still on the outside. The economy is very much ‘white’. It has a few token blacks, but so many who gave their life in the struggle have died unrewarded.”

    She was pained. Her uncreased brown face had lost the softness.

    “I cannot forgive him for going to receive the Nobel [Peace Prize in 1993] with his jailer [FW] de Klerk. Hand in hand they went. Do you think de Klerk released him from the goodness of his heart? He had to. The times dictated it, the world had changed, and our struggle was not a flash in the pan, it was bloody to say the least and we had given rivers of blood. I had kept it alive with every means at my disposal”.

    We could believe that. The world-famous images flashed before our eyes and I am sure hers. The burning tyres – Winnie endorsed the necklacing of collaborators in a speech in 1985 (“with our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country”) – the stoning, the bullets, the terrible deaths of “informers”. Her often bloodthirsty rhetoric has marred her reputation.

    “Look at this Truth and Reconciliation charade. He should never have agreed to it.” Again her anger was focused on Mandela. “What good does the truth do? How does it help anyone to know where and how their loved ones were killed or buried? That Bishop Tutu who turned it all into a religious circus came here,” she said pointing to an empty chair in the distance.

    “He had the cheek to tell me to appear. I told him a few home truths. I told him that he and his other like-minded cretins were only sitting here because of our struggle and me. Because of the things I and people like me had done to get freedom.”

    Winnie’s pain has to be understood. She was sounding bitter but then it is a reality when friends part ways, when you see the one become larger than life while other colleagues are painted as villain then what can we expect? Except for Mandela, most of the ANC team was relegated to nothingness and those who were assertive were projected negatively by the western media. Can we truly say that South Africa is a country of unity at the moment? The lofty ideals of ‘forgiveness’ as being hailed by Clintons and Obamas need to be asked to those who have witnessed those humiliation of living life pushed as slaves. I know Winnie was charged with murders, retribution, frauds and what not but none can deny her commitment to the cause of her people and her struggle in building up organization with other people in the absence of Mandela. After Mandela was released, she was sidelined and it is certain that a person who commits herself so much feel bitter which the interview clearly reflected.

    The double standards are visible. You glorify a person because he has been fixed into your ‘democratic’ ‘tolerant’ model. So, you are great because you have ‘forgiven’ the tyrants, the democratic ones, who left no stone unturned to kill you and your ‘violence’. ‘We’ are opposed to ‘violence’ they would say without giving any alternatives to those who suffers in indignity and humiliation daily. Yes, violence does not mean the P.Botha regime was killing the blacks, firing upon them when they were raising issues of their human rights. Yes, ‘slavery’ is not violence perhaps and that was you can bring Gadhafi to law books, kill Saddam Hussein for violating human rights of the people but whether it is Yitzhak Rabin or FW D Klerk you baptize them through your Nobel Prizes and the entire ‘past’ is ‘forgiven’. In this battle the Western regimes have won but they have actually created differences among the communities who have been oppressed. Whether Mandela or Yasser Arafat, people of both South Africa and Palestine felt betrayed as their dream lands still eludes them.”


  27. Excellent Mr balance SIR!


  28. In the now more often than not repeated words of a world FREEDOM FIGHTER. father forgive them for they know not what they.ve done. these words are the mirror image of mandella thoughts. Winnie has not been able to understand the need and necessity of healing through forgivness and clings to bitterness as a way of healing. maybe the politics of economics might have been too much of a burden for one man however he put so africans on the right path and it is up to them to continue the fightfor economicfreedom


  29. Apparently, it takes a special kind of conservative to avoid falling into what even an embarrassed Cornell West has characterized as the “Santa-Claus-ification” of Nelson Mandela.

    It’s tough to buck the tsunami of media deification of Mandela in the wake of his death.

    What else can explain the warm fuzzy talk from the likes of Ted Cruz, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and even Rush Limbaugh in recent days?

    Why is it so difficult for conservatives to tell the truth about Mandela?

    Is it a lack of information?

    Is it a fear of being labeled “racist”?

    Here are some documentable and undeniable facts about Mandela:

    He was a longtime Community Party member, though he lied about his allegiance from time to time.
    He was not a “political prisoner” for 27 years, as is often reported, but was convicted of specific acts of sabotage and revolutionary activity. He was offered many opportunities to walk out of prison a free man if he simply denounced violence and terrorism. He refused.

    His best friends on the world scene during his active political life were Fidel Castro, Moammar Gadhafi and Yasser Arafat.

    He hated the United States and called it the country that, more than any other, “committed unspeakable atrocities in the world.” He concluded by saying Americans “don’t care for human beings.”

    What’s the documentation for this? His own words. His own deeds.

    It’s one thing for the state-run media to pronounce secular sainthood on Mandela. But Rush? Say it ain’t so.

    Is it too much to ask for even conservatives to stand up to the whitewashing of Mandela’s record?

    If so, won’t they have to apologize to the likes of Arafat, Gadhafi and Castro?

    Experience more of Joseph Farah’s no-nonsense truth-telling in his books, audio and video products, featured in the WND Superstore

    I know it’s tough. It’s not like Mandela didn’t have some redeeming qualities. He was not a cartoon figure as his triumvirate of evil friends were. Yes, he even reined in his wife, Winnie, and divorced her when she publicly chanted for “necklacing” their political opponents – placing gasoline-soaked tires around their necks and lighting them on fire. Yes, he was right to oppose Apartheid and helped bring it to an end.

    I get that.

    Nevertheless, should the U.S. be lowering its government flags to half-staff for an America-hater?

    Should the U.S. be lowering its government flags to half-staff for a Communist Party leader?

    Should the U.S. be lowering its government flags to half-staff for a liar and a deceiver?

    Should the U.S. be lowering its government flags to half-staff for an unrepentant terrorist?

    Should the U.S. be lowering its government flags to half-staff for a friend of Arafat, Gadhafi and Castro?

    This is something the U.S. didn’t do for one of its strongest friends and allies in modern times – Lady Margaret Thatcher.

    I’m grateful Rush Limbaugh pointed that out with some irony.

    But conservatives need not jump on the bandwagon of official sanctification and media adulation.

    What’s wrong with a dose of truth?

    Mandela was not a freedom fighter – any more than his loathsome buddy Yasser Arafat was.

    Forgive me if I don’t mourn for Mandela. I mourn instead for his victims. I mourn instead for those martyrs being persecuted, tortured and killed every day around the world for their faith in God. I mourn instead for the tens of millions of innocent victims of Communism and other forms of totalitarianism Mandela promoted.

    By the way, though my commentaries on Mandela have been read by hundreds of thousands of people in the last week, not a single person has questioned even one of the facts I have reported that indict his semi-official narrative.

    Maybe I just don’t have enough mourning in me for people like Mandela, who got more than he deserved as his reward during 95 years of life on the planet.

    Conservatives need to buck up and learn how to defend their own heroes. They don’t need to align themselves with the media myth-makers.

    With the death of this legend, even the boldest conservatives of our time have become self-conscious about proclaiming the truth. And it’s the truth that always sets us free.

    Order WND columnist Ilana Mercer’s brilliant polemical work, “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa”

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/self-conscious-conservatives-for-mandela/#RR7vYqxE8h8wKxXp.99


  30. Winnie is making an obvious point which is often overlooked when we romanticize Mandela. The simple message, no one man is a mountain.


  31. As a witch hunt continues by the conservative right to descercrated a freedom fighterNelson Mandella.the eyes of the word stays focus and steadfast in remenbering a man who chose good over evil


  32. The bottom line of reality for Mandela, in eternity IS* did he repent as a Sinner, like ALL of us are, accepting and receiving The Lord Jesus Christ into his heart and life, if he did NOT; then he is in Hell!

    As Almighty God is NO* respecter of ANY person, as He does NOT see or deal with the Colour of man’s skin, ONLY what IS* done in, by and through Christ, by any man, will have rewards in Heaven.

    ‘For by Grace (unmeritted, un-earned FAVOR!) you have been saved through Faith ( In Christ Jesus) and that NOT of yourselves; it IS* the GIFT* of God. NOT or WORKS, (Why not?) lest anyone should BOAST.” ( Eph. 2: 8,9) Emphasis added.

    “Nor is there Salvation in any other, for there is NO OTHER name (other than Jesus Christ) under heaven given among men by which we MUST be Saved.” ( Acts. 4: 12)

    The playing field before Almighty God IS* level for ALL men, regardless of COLOUR!


  33. Mandellab did not choseb his rilen but he was chosen as a vehicke for neccessary change. howevervlike milion of stars in the universe there is always one that shines brighter and Nelson was that one nevertheless those who fought and die for his cause will be revel and illuminated in history just for being in his presence.and there deaths would have not been in vain Winnie point might be justifiable according to her point of view but can be easily be musunderstood no need for her to be centre stage.


  34. @ Zoe
    LOL
    It REALLY pisses you off that a BLACK man who at some stage was responsible for kicking some white butt and befriending people like Castro, Gadaffi and the USSR could now be universally venerated nuh!!!?

    When did you rant and rave against what your pals like Botha and DeClerk ROUTINELY did to the poor blacks of South Africa?…and Barbados?

    Did you ever pause to note who JESUS associated with…?
    Was it not with foul mouthed fishermen who routinely talked about “brass bowls” and used other flowery and ‘less than refined’ language?
    Did HE not associate with prostitutes, bushmen and beggars and other anti- establishment types….?

    What kind of exegesis expert are you?
    It appears that you start from your racist biased position, and then seek to convince yourself that your analysis of the bible supports that position. LOL….no wonder you can’t figure out the Trinity nonsense….

    While you look to find any possible fault with Mandela, others are looking at the examples of love and unselfishness that he exemplifies..
    ….perhaps if you do an exegesis on Jesus’s response to those who wanted to stone the adulteress to death – you would be less inclined to pelt rocks at Madeba…… 🙂

    ….or knowing you…..perhaps not.


  35. BUSH TEA

    WHAT ZOE SAID HERE IS THE CLEAR TEACHING OF THE BIBLE’IT IS SOUND EXEGESIS AND I CONCUR AND REITERATE
    Zoe | December 11, 2013 at 11:13 AM |
    The bottom line of reality for Mandela, in eternity IS* did he repent as a Sinner, like ALL of us are, accepting and receiving The Lord Jesus Christ into his heart and life, if he did NOT; then he is in Hell!

    As Almighty God is NO* respecter of ANY person, as He does NOT see or deal with the Colour of man’s skin, ONLY what IS* done in, by and through Christ, by any man, will have rewards in Heaven.

    ‘For by Grace (unmeritted, un-earned FAVOR!) you have been saved through Faith ( In Christ Jesus) and that NOT of yourselves; it IS* the GIFT* of God. NOT or WORKS, (Why not?) lest anyone should BOAST.” ( Eph. 2: 8,9) Emphasis added.

    “Nor is there Salvation in any other, for there is NO OTHER name (other than Jesus Christ) under heaven given among men by which we MUST be Saved.” ( Acts. 4: 12)

    The playing field before Almighty God IS* level for ALL men, regardless of COLOUR!


  36. Another defining moment yesterday as if an alingment of two powerful human beings one in death and the other alive souls were to be connected as one on the same soil as obama was met with great enthusiasm and exhuberance the equivalence of a baptism of fire heaped on him in his homeland by the So african people .the america conservative should take note Out of one many


  37. Actually the defining moment was Mandela in death exposing the folly of the division created by man made ideology. The Castro Obama handshake.


  38. @ David
    What division created by what man made ideology are you talking about? The only REAL divisions that exists among mankind are race and religious. The others are merely convenient mechanisms designed to achieve specific materialistic and strategic advantages at particular points of time….

    The Americans were the FIRST to make up with the Russians when it became clear that this was to their material advantage in the world wars.

    They then demonized them as communists during the Cold War years when the fight was on for strategic alliances ….and they made up again after Reagan’s time, and when George Bush looked into the president of USSR’s eyes and declared him to be trust-worthy.

    When the eastern block began to shake its tail, the Americans were quick to make friends with China…(communism and all) while CUBA remans public enemy no 1 despite being NO THREAT…..and this will continue until it becomes clear that the USA has something to gain from an alliance with Cuba….and has overcome its hurt pride from the Bay of Pigs.

    Just like “Mandela” was created, manipulated, and used, …to ensure that whites retained their position and wealth “post liberation” in South Africa,… these various ideologies are created to achieve similar ends from time to time….
    LOL
    The white people are not brass bowls. They KNOW how to manipulate us…and how to protect their interests at any costs…
    …cause if they had left Winnie and her people ‘large and in charge’ ..it would have been a different going down in SA way….

    …of course the white world would have then done a “Haiti / Cuba/ Zimbabwe” on South Africa. So either way the blacks would have ended up in poverty and misery…..

    Perhaps Mandela’s approach was right after all….. 🙂


  39. David agree but the castro moment can be defined in similar fashion to mandella with a ting ever so small of forgiveness one that some might hate while others would love. unbelievable events with unforseen similarities that only a god could direct such pathways.


  40. @Bushie
    You know that ALL HUMAN Politicians that depend on votes will do anything to get those votes. Florida has a lot of Votes and many are CUBAN! Those Cubans agree on one thing, Castro is one terrible hombre!

    Never forget that Pols always love to use the “bogeyman” to their advantage, especially those that are external.

    Winnie would surely have cost half a million lives+! No way the West would, or frankly could, allow 41% of the World’s PLATINUM to get into the hands of potential enemies in SA or Commies! NB Russia is number 2 in Platinum.
    SA has 23 of the most required metals and minerals whereas the US has 6! They would HAVE to respond militarily OR risk their Economy AND Military functions! ONLY TOTAL IDIOTS would permit such REGARDLESS of Race!

    Strategic SUICIDE!


  41. @Bushie

    Maybe we are saying the same thing.

  42. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bush Tea | December 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM |

    Well said!

    What about the Japanese, Korean and Vietnam situations?
    It would be interesting to see how America responds to any further breakdown in relations between China and Japan now that China has the military wherewithal to flex its muscles and seek revenge on the Japanese nation for the atrocities committed by the Imperial Army during 1937-45.


  43. Man Miller…you alright?
    What is this lotta “Bushie praise”……Bushie is more accustomed to taking licks from the Miller….
    Ya got BT offset yuh….

    LOL
    Bushmen are wary of Anunnaki bearing gifts…..


  44. @Miller
    The Americans have already sent unarmed bombers through the NO FLY Zone established over the Islands that China covets but Japan possesses.
    The Americans are obliged to defend Sth Korea and Japan by treaty and obviously by self interest.

    Yes the ATROCITIES of throwing Babies in the air and bayoneting them on the way down in Nanking! You guys thought it was just Whitey that was / is terrible??? HUMANS including the very Darkest can be terrible to other humans regardless of race!!! Dont forget that modern Japs are actually from China 2000 yr ago! Dem all creamy / light brown.


  45. Mandela left prison and became President, the exact opposite of what should happen to most Pols in Bim and elsewhere!

  46. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bush Tea | December 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM |

    Bushie, when you are talking sense or making jokes I will have your back.
    I am not a volte-face hypocrite like ac. If the Anunnaki messenger from the BBE is for you who can be against you? LOL!!!

    Despite your determined anti-red stance and obvious leanings to the yellow camp, you do sometimes make justifiably constructive criticisms of this beleaguered DLP administration which is much unlike ac and CCC who can be classified as true yellow dye in-the-wool yardfowls.

    Watch and see how she is going to justify the laying off of thousands of public sector workers as DEMANDED by the IMF in their recent consultations and passed on to the PM for implementation by January coming. He has indicated his intent to make the necessary announcement before year-end, preferably before Parliament goes on the Xmas recess. We shall see if he remains true to his MO and vacillate, defer and prevaricate; passing the buck of making a public announcement to someone else like bigmouth Donville Inniss.


  47. There are some measures which cannot be postponed.EWB came to the aid of Castro when the Cubans fought the war of liberation of Southern Africa.The last slaves arriving in Cuba in 1873 came from Angola.Their descendants returned to liberate their kith and kin beginning in 1973.It is no accident that Mandela admired and embraced Castro because without the Cuban army,Mandela might have been a memory.The tour de force was the defeat of the South African forces by the Cubans with the cooperation of EWB.On this basis then
    the PM should have been on the rostrum in Jo’burg yesterday.Historian that he is supposed to be,someone would have had to brief him of that history.Perhaps
    he has a lot on his plate,prevaricator and loser that he is.


  48. miller who de hell voted the imf to be anything in barbaddos , except they being the global mouthpiece for the world’s financial networks,..


  49. @David
    Actually the defining moment was Mandela in death exposing the folly of the division created by man made ideology. The Castro Obama handshake.
    ***********
    I did some research and it has been done before; Bill Clinton shook hands with big brother Fidel at the UN in 2000. After the greetings Obama still delivered this zinger ““There are too many leaders who claim solidarity with [Mandela’s] struggle for freedom, but do not tolerate dissent from their own people,” which probably made some leaders shift uncomfortably in their seats. (Raoul’s interpreter probably whispered that Obama said there were showers of blessings today)

    The USA is guilty of many things but the US has relaxed some of the tough measures that it has imposed on Cuba, what has Castro done in return? Castro has purged the Party of young upcoming leaders and solidified power in his hands, when he became too feeble he passed the torch on to “young” Raoul.

    Whatever faults Mandela had he knew as an octogenarian the Presidency was not for him, that lesson has been lost on Mugabe.


  50. “Winnie has not been able to understand the need and necessity of healing through forgivness and clings to bitterness as a way of healing. maybe the politics of economics might have been too much of a burden for one man however he put so africans on the right path and it is up to them to continue the fightfor economic freedom”
    I sure wish you could apply your hypocritical posturing to yourself and stop demonising Mr Arthur

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading