Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This picture does not paint a thousand words. Just say what you want to say! Stupse.
Agreed.
Reblogged this on CARIBBEAN VIBE – Whats News.
We discussed this matter at length on the other blog which death with the Nation newspaper sex scene and we promised to post the picture of the teacher who impregnated a student and remains employed.
David
Why if what you say is true…….just yesterday PM Stuart was up there (CCFS)….giving a speech to the youngsters on the things to avoid in life…why is this man Worrell not yet dismissed and dragged before the Courts.. so that justice can be done and the school uphold its good name?
Again I am lost with this article……….on the other hand..lets hope your sources are good …and that a good man’s name is not being dragged thru the mud as another frenzy is about to begin…..
@Onions
Perhaps like the King Report which gathered dust at the Ministry of Education and was the catalyst for the AX Mess so too the PM is clueless about this matter.
as for people now first time onlookers to BU a full explanation should be given as to why there is a picture of a man sitting behind drums with a giant smile,
David
As with the thread ..Appeal to Roebuck. Secondary School etc… and as ac proports ..”onlookers to BU a full explanation should be given as to why there is a picture of a man sitting behind drums with a giant smile”,…
…we are not getting enough intro read ups on articles of recent …..hence the comments .. ” I am lost with this one” and…”picture does not say a thousand words “
@Onions
Sometime a post on BU is intended to target a very few. Don’t worry about it, we know what we are doing.
It’s not the picture in itself that conveys the message, but the mind behind the picture that you ought to take into consideration that really matters.
These two threads…..this one and the Roebuck Secondary…should be retracted for (1) ambiguity (2) lack of information…..I quote BU’s motto
“For the cause that lacks assistance, The wrong that needs resistance, For the future in the distance, And the good that I [BU] can do.
…..there is potential for too much damage being done to innocent psych’s
corr : psyches
David you have credibility with the BU family of bloggers.
I therefore believe you would not indulge in character assassination.
Teacher impregnates a student…..Should be fired.
With regards to the Louis Lynch story we should have empathy with the past students who think they may have been gotten cancer or other illnesses from that location.
We should not callously dismiss their concerns unless experts say it did not or could not have happened.
Very interesting “Not the picture ” the mind behind the picture. Is there a Psychologist in the house? this picture has a mind that needs to be unmasked.
Thanks Hants, Mr. Sorrel, Minister Ronald Jones, the headmaster et al are free to issue a statement to deny what is generally known.
Now be carefullll. what is known is not always be the truth. maybe the CCJ can give clearance on this picture.
@ Hants
We are not questioning creditability here but merely cautioning BU not to be too hasty.The operative word is CAUTION…..defamation esp. in the case of a teacher is a serious bit. Readers must also be reserved the right to question when something seem strange. This is CCFS….not Cawmere watershed of the current Chief Wig….. I am made to understand Mr. Worrell was also involved in yesterday’s proceedings….does this not sound a bit strange? When a certain other assistant principal at a Black Rock institution was “called to account”….he was suspended from duties.
What does this say to you?
It seems from your post this man is a cymbal of what is wrong with the school system. At the rute of it is his ability to snare a student using his power over them If a highhat stance is taken by the school it may trigger a backlash that even people with no vested interest will chime in. Police must be called even if nothing sticks, Brushes with the law or past behaviour is the bass element of how they will proceed in any case if true he deserves a good kick in the crotales
To old onion bags: B 4 we say a teacher who impregnate a school child or a teacher who gets impregnated for a school boy should be dismissed and dragged before the Courts there are a few things we have to look at.
The age of the girl/boy and His/ Her willingness to participate. If they are of age(16) and consented what can a person be charged and dismissed for. It may be morally wrong
Please note I have picked no sides…..but
By posting the man’s name…..and the school…followed by “coverup”….won’t they be immediately scarred? …..supposing it’s a lie..can that be retracted in the reader’s mind who hasn’t followed thru?
@sss
Any teacher who impregnates a student their ass needs to be kicked. It shouldn’t matter if the student is at the age of Vincent. It is your BS reasoning which has landed us where we are. It seems we can give a rationale for anything done that is wrong when COMMONSENSE says different.
@Onions
Stays tuned, we are sourcing the pics for you and will blur them just to satisfy your concern.
Oh no no no David…please don’t prejudiced BU ‘s position now…..think of the Nation…definitely NOT…..We all love this site….so a big time NO…LoL
Let me clear up some issues. In another blog, I wrote about a teacher who was caught having sex on the school premises with one of his students, and management hid it up. The person at the head of this threat is that teacher.
The teacher at a leading secondary school on Crumpton Street who impregnated the student was the volleyball coach and the student was the captain of the team. That is a different person. His punishment was a transfer to another leading secondary where he still coaches girls.
The third person I wrote about was a principal who impregnated one of his students and his punishment was study leave to pursue a masters.
I hope this has set the record straight.
David…..how and where did the “age of Vincent” enter this thread and what is it?As the name is like mine I am curious?
@ Caswell
Well….well well well…that certainly brought BU’s credence back……!!!
It would seem from the cases cited by Caswell, that if you are appointed in the teaching service you can screw and breed who you wish with gay abandon, and it will be covered up.Interesting
NOT SUPPORTING ONIONS 🙂 , but the truth is that in Bushie’s humble opinion, this is NOT the best approach to dealing with this problem…
The photo that Bushie would like to see displayed at the top of this page is that of the PRINCIPAL who allowed the situation to go unresolved. If the principal then showed that he tried but was superseded by higher, ups, then Bushie would put up the Chief Education Officer, ….Minister and …PM etc.
We keep trying to address these problems at the lowest possible level when the SOURCE of the problems is much higher up.
These jackasses run these schools in a way that ENCOURAGES and covers up this kind of thing. THAT is what is wrong.
If you invite a sweet tooth man into a candy store and then go to town and leave him there for a whole day – what the €£%# would you expect…? …especially when some of the damn candy literally jumps up at you…?
Lotta shiite…..then we seek to crucify the poor sucker. True he deserves to pay whatever price for his lack of self control and if he ends up with diabetes it will be his licorish fault….BUT THE REAL PROBLEM IS THE JACKASS STORE MANAGERS.
…..wunna have ANY IDEA of how many DONT GET CAUGHT?
Focusing on the problem at this level is basically saying to the players…just DONT GET CAUGHT.
…while Bushie wants to send the message to the big ups “Don’t allow this shiite to continue….”
Georgie
You don’t have to be appointed: you just have to be friends with the right people. Worrell is a part time music teacher and his was covered up.
He alone should not be dismissed: the entire management team, who are aware of the matter, should go as well.
@Bush Tea
Don’t worry, we will get there.
Don’t you forget we have come a long way on BU.
@Caswell
Would the PTA have known of the skulduggery you think?
George
I will play on your gay abandon to tell you that a gay teacher gave one of his male students a mickey and had his way with the child. The little boy is receiving counselling. The dirty teacher gave the child a blackberry to keep quiet and when that didn’t work he used a high powered lawyer to threaten the father with defamation.
Bush Tea | November 30, 2013 at 2:12 PM |
NOT SUPPORTING ONIONS……………..
————-
Thank heavens too…….for when that day come….I will be scared knowing d brassbowl booked for Black Rock…lol
I am not aware if the PTA knows, but in the Worrell affair, the mother knows. When she was called to the school and informed, she fainted.
DAVID
IT SEEMS THAT THIS MATTER MUST BE CARRIED TO COMPLETION
THE CASES CITED HERE ARE RIDICULOUS!
Well it seems that disciplianary action was taken by the schoolmaybe not to the full extent that would or should have been applicable. but ! BUT! if a criminal offense occured wouldn,t civil or criminal charges not have to be filed by the parents .Should one then persumed that the parents are equally as guilty in this “coverup” for not filing criminal or civil charges against this teacher. So the teacher is now exposed SO how about parental responsibilty in taking action
@GP
Would you believe BU if we stated what is mentioned here is just the tip of the iceberg?
If you state this just the tipping point then in matters of such nature the parents as well as the child support is absolutely crtical to a conclusion. it seems that in all thes cases cited that even though the school did not revealed the teachers name failure by the parents to reveal and carry to the full extent of law should be noted.
@ ac
Why the hell do you not just READ sometimes and HUSH nuh?
Parents shiite!
This is a systemic problem. What the hell do you expect some – possibly humble – parent to achieve? …sell their damn house to pay some shiite lawyer like your man (now in Arizona) to waste years of frustrating time in the shiite courts that we have ….and achieve NOTHING in the end…
Have you ever been even just a WITNESS in a criminal case with our police…? Bushie has!!! ….NEVER imagined that such bumbling incompetence, time wasting, and plain ill manners was even possible…
…and you want to say that simple parents must humble themselves and their families good names while arrogant brass bowls deflect and conspire until they give up in frustration…?
This is a job that MUST be the responsibility of those who are highly paid and who should be highly QUALIFIED to do it….the Damn principals…..and MOE officials.
…one of these days a REAL HIGNORANT parent will execute appropriate recompense in one of these matters …you wait…
…but then you ac will juck in your big mouth saying that they should have left it for the authorities to deal with…. BB – !
AGREE WITH YOU BUSH TEA
DAVID TELL US MORE
LET IT RIP
No decent human being can sanction or enable or cover up Teachers fcukin school children.
This is no love story. This is exploitation,abuse of power and possibly paedophillia.
We in the BU family like GP,Bushie,David,BAFBFP, Old Onions are intelligent enough to understand that children must be protected from predators.
@ ac do you seriously expect parents to up against the wall the big ups put up to defend these teachers?
I bet that the children involved are not from the middle or upper class in Barbados.
Hants said – from God knows where – “you have the confidence of the BU family”
Exactly who appointed Hants to speak for everyone? I certainly didn’t appoint him.
The photo…isn’t it called making bullets for others to fire?
Someone makes an allegation on another post. It is taken as true. David says he’ll publish a photo. He does. So he is complicit since the two posts run together. Does David KNOW it’s true. Well, does he?
Caswell says he knows it’s true BUT it has been covered up. Well,…..err… then how does HE know?
IF it has been covered up, perhaps there was a good reason to cover it up but then we don’t know whether it HAS been covered up. Yes we do. Caswell says so. But how does he know it’s been covered up?…and so round and round we go and meanwhile people who cannot answer back are held up to ridicule and contempt..
Old O…with you.
Huh is that so a parents responsibilty is to the welfare and well being of the child big up my ass . let the chips fall where they may. What can the big ups do me . what is there to be afraid of. if one does not have something to hid. not goingalong wid them excuse .it is inexcusable as a parent not to do the right thing for YOUR child.
Bushie don.t tellme to hush! who the hell u think you are any parent with any commonsense would use proper judgement and take such matters to the law. Exposed my ass.that is only to shame. But if legal action is taken then it would send a strong message that such misconduct would not be tolerated. failure of the parents to file charges should not be condone it is unjustifiable and reeks of suspicion.
Like Bushie has correctly stated many of these incidents are hushed up to protect the reputations of those with influence. Often times the parents do not want to put their children through the glare of the system, the court, the child care board, the police etc.
David
Agreed.
SO David if what u say the reason for “hushup” then ur comment only gives merit as to why the “cover up by the school which both parent and school might have agreed to . it also dismiss the relevancy of the article on the grounds stated and contradicts your intent outside of shaming the perpertrator.
@ac
You should take Bush Tea’s advice.
Take what advice i am aparent with girl children don.t need a mcguffe advice. if there is a problem getting to the root should be of all concern . not sensationalising.
@ ac | November 30, 2013 at 3:33 PM |
It is not easy for a parent, especially a mother to expose her daughter by having to expose the teacher in situations such as these. It is an embarrassment to the student, the parent(s), teachers, the school and the MoE.
The situation MUST be dealt with but carefully executed. Teachers who commit such acts should be suspended w/o pay until a full investigation is completed, and if the allegations prove to be false, transfer the teacher to another school, if possible a non-coed. If allegations proved to be true, the teacher should be dismissed; he needs to find another career.
As for the parent(s) of the student, they should pursue an out of court settlement (that is sealed) to avoid the negative publicity of their daughter; BUT to punish that teacher and to make him an example.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.