Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Brynn O'Reilley, a second year student in the Energy Systems Engineering Technology at St. Lawrence College plugs in an electric vehicle at the launch of the college's new charging station. (Elliot Ferguson The Whig-Standard)
Brynn O’Reilley, a second year student in the Energy Systems Engineering Technology at St. Lawrence College plugs in an electric vehicle at the launch of the college’s new charging station. (Elliot Ferguson The Whig-Standard)

Now that the outcry over government’s decision to make UWI students pay tuition cost has abated, there is the opportunity to debate the issue unhinged from political rhetoric. Let us keep hope alive!

At  a recent address to the CARILEC Renewable Energy Conference Minister of Energy Darcy Boyce stated that although he understands the industry is of national importance, government will not rush policy decisions to impact the stability of the grid. Many have come to appreciate that ‘rushing’ is not a quality which is associated with the Stuart led government.  At the same CARILEC conference Caricom Ambassador expressed the view that Barbados has reached a juncture where important decisions have to be made concerning energy production and there was a ‘certain urgency’ required.

Commonsense dictates that government and the regulator should not take decisions to destabilize the EMERA owned sole electric company in Barbados. BU must question whether the minister with responsibility for energy should be the one quoted. Minister Boyce must be perceived by his utterances to be the champion of government’s renewable energy program (RE). There must be no doubt in the minds of members of the public that he is part of a decision making process to rollout RE which is calibrated to the urgency of the times. All Barbadians must feel the weight of importance which the RE program has for Barbados. We must feel his energy!

Ambassador Bobby Morris needs to clarify when he stated government is “moving apace to establish the legal framework in cooperation and conjunction with the major players to facilitate the build out of renewable energy”. On the face of it it seems to BU the message he is sending is a more urgent one when compared to that of Minister Boyce.

One wonders if the UWI was able to add value to the RE debate if there might be justification that its curriculum is relevant and aligned to national priorities. And as a consequence paying tuition cost might have been a non issue. In this vein it was interesting to read this week about a college in Canada involved in a research project meant to study electric vehicle use. St. Lawrence College designed three electric vehicle charging stations to study electric vehicle use – see article College plugs into the future. Professor Oliver Headley must be writhing.

If RE is a national priority BU is not feeling the energy.

BU received the following suggestions from Serenity if it is serious about greening Barbados, a laudable initiative.

  • For houses they offer greater tax incentives to use photo voltaic energy. A number of other measures, such as powering government buildings with solar energy. Hopefully government goes totally green and include green computing. Electronic files, filing and database and only print when necessary.
  • The voluminous Gazettes should be eliminated. Have a public website, courtesy of the GIS, where an electronic publish of information suffices the law of Gazette publications.
  • Government should consider lowering the import duty on hybrid cars to allow more people to make the switch. A hybrid can get about 50 mpg these days which is about 8-900 km a tank depending on how you drive.
  • And since government has been leading the charge, they should also consider getting rid of the huge number of gas guzzlers in the current fleet of state owned vehicles. All the messenger vehicles, statutory corporations, all of them. Especially the police vehicles. Every single police vehicle is an SUV and this alone uses almost twice as much gasoline as a car.

If government was serious about spear heading the greening initiative then they would seriously consider this. But without compelling incentives for hybrids/electrics then we are going no where fast.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 responses to “Energy in Renewable Energy”

  1. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    “If government was serious about spear heading the greening initiative then they would seriously consider this. But without compelling incentives for hybrids/electrics then we are going no where fast.”

    The focus of the Government’s policies and programmes on RE lies within the Office of the PM. In spite of all the long talk and hot air don’t expect to see any alacrity or seriously affirmative action in this area.

    Neither should we expect Boyce to be too enthusiastic in pushing this strategy.
    Unlike the Pierhead marina redesign project there are very few kickbacks or opportunities for financially rewarding corruption in the RE business and would not attract the likes of Bannister and friends.
    Minister Boyce needs to be removed from spearheading the RE strategy and replaced by a consultant from the Private Sector who knows what he or she is doing and prepared to advance the RE movement.

    If the PM is going to be judged as a success in at least one area it ought to be his publicly acclaimed commitment to RE being the underlying strategy in the restructuring of the Bajan economy. The problem is whether he has the leadership qualities to push this policy to a point where it becomes the game changer not only for the economy but also for his party future electoral fortunes.
    We shall see if these high sounding nationally appealing pronouncements in the throne speech are just empty reneging promises from his vacillating backpedalling mouth already full of gas of hot air.

    “The centre piece of Barbados’ economic strategy will be the creation of a Renewable Energy Revolution which will enhance the competitiveness of the productive sectors by reducing energy costs, reducing the fuel import bill, creating new jobs and helping to lower the cost of living.”

    “Against a background where the costs of this country’s oil imports continue to rise astronomically, with concomitant drain on our foreign exchange, it is imperative that firm steps be taken to reduce this financial burden and allow such funds to be allocated to other sectors of the economy.
    My Government will therefore put systems in place to reduce the cost of imported energy by $150 million over the next five years. It will reduce CO2 emissions and reliance on fossil fuels and cut electricity consumption by significant amounts. It will also amend the legislation relating to the provision of electricity to allow for the disaggregation of electricity services, where specific rates or fees are established for generation, transmission and distribution.
    My Government will also establish a Stakeholder Forum with all major financial and banking institutions with the objective of implementing a “Rapid Finance” initiative to fast track financing for homeowners seeking to install renewable energy electricity generation systems.
    My Government will continue working with our CARICOM neighbour Trinidad and construction of a natural gas pipeline linking Trinidad and Tobago to Barbados.”


  2. @Miller

    BU’s concern is that Mr. king of the BL&P should not be in the press suggesting they have concerns about proposed amendments to the Electricy Bill. As a key stakeholder in the process they ll need to be on the same page IF RE is a national priority.


  3. who need more car on the road anyway. what is needed is a RE program that would save govt and every household in barbados high energy cost. this talk about initiatives for hybrid cars sound good but only benefits a few who can afford such luxury while in the meantime causing the govt to lose much need revenue while the taxpayer is handed the bill to recoup for any losses form such proposals

  4. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    @ David | September 25, 2013 at 8:33 AM |

    That’s a veiled threat initiated by the major shareholder to let the country know that if the government does not back off the RE project until their investment is fully recovered then the operation is prepared to compromise the economic viability of the country by purposely running down the generation plant by cessation of ‘capital’ maintenance expenditures and investment to maintain adequate capacity and reliability of supply.

    It must be clearly understood that any expansion in RE as a source of power for domestic or commercial use (off-grid consumption) would have a concomitant or pari passu reduction in the BL&P customer and revenue base. Reduced revenues with high fixed costs automatically translate into reduced profits and smaller ROI unless the remaining ‘on-grid’ customers are charged higher rates to make up for the profit shortfall.

    King is just a mouthpiece and pawn that would be sacrificed on the altar of expediency when the time comes like Alex McDonald.

  5. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    @ ac | September 25, 2013 at 9:10 AM |

    Why don’t you stay clear of this very serious non-partisan issue? Go back to reading the Nation newspaper or join Carson Carrion in personally attacking some other person like Adrian Loveridge or Prodigal Son, as is your forte.
    Better yet, have a déjà vu moment and go back and live in the past when OSA was politically alive and relevant. Please feel free to blame everything challenging Bim today on him and his band of brigands and yardfowls.
    Your contribution will not help the debate or enlighten any one on this most important topic underpinning the viability of the Barbados economy.


  6. Of couse not….all these govt vie back in 4tarting from 2006 is partb iof what help stagnate the economy especially when cost iof fuel was escalating. Your master and chief OSA rather than restructing and rebuilding the economy thought it best to put all the money in peoples hand leaving little to build an economy on strong and firm measures. now sumbody come along asking govt to give what they don.t have . A RE program must be designed to help all not just a few.


  7. @Miller

    Please stay focused on the topic and not be sidetracked with nonsense. We have to start the process. As Kellman correctly stated yesterday the need to reduce our import oil cost is a national imperitive. A big reason is the forex savings which is worth its weight in gold. There is no reason why we should not give incentives to those who want to buy energy efficient cars to do so. If we don’t they will buy the regular vehicles anyway. Also give incentives to the UWI to encourage research in RE in a practical way. in other words if implementing RE is a national priority let us see it reflected in all our policy decisions.

  8. George C. Brathwaite Avatar
    George C. Brathwaite

    @ David

    I agree with you and I agree with greening and energy saving programmes. Incentives? Interesting, but I wonder about the initial costs and the great demand for foreign exchange that is a must since none of the major input components are local. By the way, what about the small things for the householder in terms of information and encouragement or are we to take these things for-granted? This fiscal deficit and increasing debt burden is a bigger constraint than we may at first imagine.


  9. @George

    This is all part of the incentives. It seems that the government is more driven to incent the end user more than the manufacturers, technicians etc. The good thing is that the PVs and supporting materials is a one time thing to be amortized over 5 or 6 years.


  10. David says:

    “There is no reason why we should not give incentives to those who want to buy energy efficient cars to do so.”

    __________________________________

    From information gathered on those hybrid (battery charged) cars, the battery life is reported to have a 6 hour longevity, you do not need six hours to get anywhere in Barbados, half an hour will do, these cars are perfect for the island.

    ac…..HUSH


  11. I couldn.,t careless who buy these expensive hybirds all ac is saying that the money given to the “well to do” to buy these expensive cars would be served better if broader and more inclusive policies are applied through RE to help all.


  12. @ac

    Why can’t you get it through your skull that consumers are buying cars every day in Barbados and therefore incentives to curb the imports of fossil based cars is in the interest of the country? Are you so one track that you can’t understand a simple argument?


  13. Time is running out for Barbados based on how the world market has changed. If we have to implement RE let us do so as quickly as is practable and not rely on some bureaucrat’s view.


  14. @ David
    Is it incentives to buy hybrids that we need…
    …or DISINCENTIVES to buy anything else…?


  15. @Bush. Tea

    Sorry for not making it clear but incentives to import hybrids, electrics, natural gas must be balanced with raising duties on fossil run vehicles. Of course we have the Kyffins, Corbins et al who are influential by their deep pockets and the fact they employ hundreds of Barbadians. The politicians obviously lack he political will to do what is right.


  16. Stuart wants to have RE, Darcy will not be rushed and Lowe wants to borrow $400 million to build a WTE plant to burn garbage which he will import.


  17. Until we have disclosure of Campaign Financing to politicians, the Simpsons, Corbins, Shell, Esso and Light & Power will continue to screw us without vaseline thanks to money.


  18. I must be getting old when I first went to Barbados they had donkeys pulling carts now they are driving cars


  19. Harry…
    By “campaign financing” did you mean OPEN BRIBERY of our prospective leaders as enticement to GIVE AWAY our hard earned national assets to the shameless mobsters for a few pieces of silver?

    Imagine we accept a situation where these goons can ‘donate’ hundreds of thousands of dollars to BOTH parties, with the clear expectation that whoever wins, THEY will reap MILLIONS in illegal rewards.

    How the hell will we ever get RATIONAL policy decisions from the politicians? …why wunna surprised there is no coherent policy?

    ..people want locking up…!


  20. What is sad is that both parties practice it and after winning an election on a platform of introducing transparency legislation in 2008 6 years later we are still waiting. In fact the PM has intimated that the government is looking at reviewing the legislation currently being considered.

    Do we have alternaives that can see private power generation and distribution? Would the legislation have to be amended? Is this possible at all?


  21. lawson | September 25, 2013 at 2:17 PM |
    I must be getting old when I first went to Barbados they had donkeys pulling carts now they are driving cars

    MURDAH!


  22. The Boxer
    New pressures are building which will force a change in the conventional way of thinking and ultimately call for a new utility business model. The issues we face are, however, significant and will require careful planning and programing.
    The increasing use of renewable energy will have implications for investment strategies, capital formation, earnings levels, tariff structures and even for the role of the utility itself.

    Large plant investments are required in the next five to ten years to replace an ageing grid. By 2018 BL&P will be retiring seven (7) generating units, a total of 103 MW, that will be replaced at an over-night capital cost of $300 million.
    This plant modernization comes at a time when renewable generation costs are declining and utility operating costs are climbing. Plant load growth is also declining and will remain as more customers turn to renewables, energy efficiency and conservation.
    These developments will present great challenges for reliability, rate equity, and the recovery of fixed costs.To confront this future the regulatory orientation must shift the focus from one that concentrates on inputs (cost -of-service and rate-of -return) to one that provides the right incentives to deliver innovation and desired outputs.
    This proposed regulatory model (decoupling) is designed to ensure that BL&P recover the allowed required revenues independent of their sales volume. The general goal is to remove a disincentive for the utility to embrace energy efficiency, renewable energy, or any other measures that reduce customer usage.
    These are some of the broader regulatory issues but there are other significant technical, economic and financial hurdles that confront us. The transformation of a power system from synchronous generation to asynchronous generation will introduce significant changes to its nature and behavior of the system that need to be understood in order to be managed effectively. A holistic approach is needed and we should thread cautiously, otherwise there could be significant unintended consequences.


  23. @david why can,t you get it through your skull that the govt is in no positiion to give any more money the few Who can afford these expensive cars. THe money can be better used in general to build a better and modern transportation transportation system which can save the country and people millions of dollars infuel cost plus high insurance .All u david think about is seklf What about the majority who have to foot the bill


  24. Dirty Harry
    You have hit the mark … “Political will” is the encapsulation of … wah ever it is dat you write … and this is all that this boils down too. Parties merely mark time and make money along the way …

    Mike Mcleary
    You soun’ real impressive boh … You lookin’ to run me from this thread too yah … “Decoupling” is a word that come up nuff times in the BL&P Rate Hearing …


  25. RE is not just about solar/wind generation. We already have a ready-made industry in solar water heating that could be and should be expanded to include every house in Barbados, as well as being mandated for any new building developments, either tourism-related or for housing. There is a double benefit to be derived here, as we have at least 3 solar water heater manufacturers. This could start NOW, not wait for some pie-in-the-sky legislation to be argued over. It’s not rocket science.


  26. @Peltdownman

    In theory what you suggest is good but who are willing to shift their cost base in these economic times? There must be incentives.


  27. Bare air. Good luck.


  28. Whatever became of the drilling bids and the revised Act?


  29. Whatever became of the geological data which was reported to have been stolen?


  30. How much did that wholes affair cost the fund where the US money from FDI is placed? And to think that all along Mottley and Party had Bajans fool’ that is was ’bout a fishing agreement with Trinidad and Tobago … HA HA HA. I din’ fool one bit …! And then my man Kellman come and informed Bajans that no agreement was really needed, after all Bajans were getting fish on their tables …!


  31. I agree with Peltdown Man. In Hawai for example SWH are mandatory and since March 2012 solar hot water systems are also mandatory in Dubai. If the government was serious about RE they would prohibit the use of electric hot water systems.


  32. @ Concerned Parent
    You serious?


  33. @ Enuff
    Serious about what?? Not sure what you’re getting at but I guess from your posting that you think that the SHW industry in Barbados is doing very well? I saw the GM of Sunpower on tv couple of weeks ago, lamenting the fact that the industry is at a standstill and that government should remove Vat from SHW systems. There are “enuff” houses, villas (new ones) which have electric systems because owners don’t like how the SHW systems look. Also apartment buildings because the owners don’t want to put in SHW. The tenants pay the electricity bills not the owners. So there is room for improvement.


  34. Enuff
    You would be surprised by the number of people who don”t like how the SHW system look and who don’t want them on their roofs. Especially the more affluent home owners on the West coast.


  35. you done know who start all this , the good old harry that used to be pun here .
    he was the first to talk about all that they are talking about and doing.bout 2 years ago.but he will not get nothing for his ideas.but he sure was right,,,,,,,
    thanks harry

  36. millertheanunnaki Avatar

    @ Mike Mcleary | September 25, 2013 at 3:44 PM |
    “This proposed regulatory model (decoupling) is designed to ensure that BL&P recover the allowed required revenues independent of their sales volume. The general goal is to remove a disincentive for the utility to embrace energy efficiency, renewable energy, or any other measures that reduce customer usage.”

    You have said a mouthful here but could you please in the interest of clarity explain what you mean by ‘allowing the BL&P to recover required revenues independent of sales volume’?

    The only way we can see this happening (guaranteeing revenue levels to meet ROI targets) is if a subsidy is given to the utility from the taxpayers’ pot.
    Any significant take up of RE by both domestic and corporate electricity users including public or government institutions would result in a direct reduction in BL&P sales or revenues.
    Even if you were to “decouple” the electricity generation side of the business from the transmission and distribution side the problem of reduced revenues would still arise as long as there are more RE users generating a surplus of electricity to the grid.

    There are also sources of RE other than solar than can exacerbate the impact on the BL&P generating capacity. If you were to take into account the politically appealing high sounding plans for a WTE plant, sugar cane factory producing year-round electricity by burning bagasse ,river tamarind and other plant waste, electricity from wind turbines and last but not least the wave energy project you would realize that the government is either the biggest bullshitter in this whole RE enterprise or the policy-makers have been rather shortsighted when it comes to the impact these RE projects would have on the BL&P operations and long-term viability.

    Can you offer a solution to this catch 22 situation as long as there is a utility with insufficient economies of scale to make decoupling worthwhile?


  37. My take here is:
    Beggars cannot be choosers.
    The present government was returned to power through hook and by crook.It used sound bites, lies and all that it took to gain a second term with little thought of how to manage the economy.
    . A government that says little and does nothing.
    The fact is the government is in power but holds no power.
    The last vested interest was lost when EMERA was allowed to purchase the only generating plant on the Island.People from far and wide advised against allowing the only generating company into ‘ONE’ foreign hand. Most learned Bajans kept quiet to the advantage of the foreign owner, to the disadvantage of the majority of the Bajans.
    We were given as a reward, a ‘face’ at the head, which matches the majority to carry out the policy of owner.
    We have noticed the absence to some extent the person who was once the mouthpiece for the company. We are fully aware who is pulling the strings.

    This government can be described as the worst in the history of this country. No one should believe a word it says.
    The situation this government now finds itself began with the previous government….’selling off the national silver’ which continued under the present. The only entity that is left to be sold is the Barbados nationality for as little as 2 million dollars. Who will be coming to buy and what will they bring with them?
    Most major businesses are owned by foreigners.
    What has bajans got to show for its 97% literacy rate gained through free education?
    In 2013 Journalists are fearful, the Clergy is fearful the graduates are fearful to speak out on issues that matter most.
    In 2013 we have resorted to blogs to make our views heard, without the fear that one gets shot or his/her head gets cracked.
    The blame must surely be laid at the feet of our elected politicians on both sides. It is obvious they ran to become a politician for purely monetary gain and nothing else.
    When will the public see ‘Transparency’ Legislation?
    This is a ‘NOTHING’ Government.


  38. @ Paradox
    And who elected the elected politicians where you want to lay blame?


  39. What is the UWI doing to add value to the RE debate and implementation? Where is the schlaship, the research?


  40. LOL @ David
    Who going do um?
    Check and see the areas in which the “professors” down there are qualified…..
    Economics, history, cricket…..

    What do you want? A historical review of the economics of playing cricket in the sun…?


  41. Has Light and Power paid off the loan used to buy those generators that the Korean’s installed some years ago? Would it be reasonable to expect BL&P to willingly agree to the installation of a source of energy that reduces its income and need for its present generation capacity?


  42. @ Bush Tea
    “The political economy of sunbathing and its relevance to gender equity and resistance to the cultural hegemony of North Atlantic polities”.


  43. Can we identify any achievements by Dr.Moseley after Professor Headley passed.

    This is what we mean about ensuring that education is relevant. What is the purpose of education if it can’t be leveraged accessed to uplift a nation?


  44. Concerned Parent you are right about the existing SWH industry being in the doldrums, and it is definitely an area where government can assist with very little cost to itself. It is also perfect for industry/university collaboration, though I must admit that studying cricket is much more important. What we see is successive governments apparently unwilling to introduce legislation that makes certain actions binding on people and companies alike. I guess that this could be one of the psychological effects of colonialism. We have seen silly things, like every new house has to have rainwater storage, but we can’t seem to see the benefit of giving tax breaks or even grants or even legisating for the installation of basic energy-saving technology. There should be a plan in place that every house in Barbados should have a solar water heater installed by 2020. That would be a start, during and after which we could gradually introduce photo voltaic units as well. We constantly hear that our foreign exchange reserves are under threat but consistently fail to take the kind of action that could help alleviate the problem.


  45. @ Ping Pong
    The political economy of sunbathing and its relevance to gender equity and resistance to the cultural hegemony of North Atlantic polities”.
    ************
    YOU! ….How you know bout that…?
    Bushie was going to do that as a PhD….but now that yuh gotta pay the bushman had to review that plan…..
    …Bushie checking with Reddy Done ‘ bout planting some tomatoes in that aqua what-ever-um-is system he got….. 🙂


  46. @ Peltdownman
    The market for solar water heating in Barbados is saturated.
    As more and more people installed, and more companies came on line, the small available market has become saturated.
    What we need to investigate is why we are not EXPORTING the technology.
    Now here is something that we have perfected, we have fine tuned the technology, we KNOW that it works – and WE HAVE THE EXPERIENCE……

    But….

    NONE OF THE BIG PLAYERS HAVE SHOWN AN EXPORT INTEREST.
    …..not BL&P. ….they are electricity not energy.
    …not Goddards
    ….not Bizzy
    …not COW
    …not government

    WONDER WHY?

    Perhaps because the ‘pioneer’ and name behind the whole thing does not qualify to become a multi-millionaire?

    OK then …why is the UNIVERSITY not pushing the technology as an export product? …perhaps because it has nothing to do with cricket?

    It has been left to small bit players who just barely manage to keep their heads above water…. Or to jokers who know NO BETTER that to invest with Nigerian businessmen…. 🙂

    The only sensible answer that Bushie can see for our lack of success with SWH involves the brass bowl explanation…….


  47. @ Lawson, not only driving cars but running Govts


  48. Bushman, 40% of households does not qualify as “saturation”. But I agree with you about exports, especially to the region. I think that the answer lies in the problems that many companies have with expansion, and that is getting over the “lump” of capital investment needed to go to the next level. This, of course, is where banks are supposed to come in. Yeah, right! I believe that this is a major problem with companies in Barbados not growing beyond the micro/small status. Once you have reached maximum production with the capital equipment/premises that you have, you then have to invest in more equipment/larger premises in order to expand. It will then take you several years before that new investment becomes fully utilised, and it’s getting over that hump that causes the problem.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading