Submitted by Bush Tea
The report from the National Advisory Committee on Education (NACE) committee that has worked over the past two years to compile recommendations for the ministry of education on the future direction of education in Barbados is as predictable and useless as could have been expected – given the way that things are done in Barbados.
According to the Nation newspaper of Tuesday June 22, the report from the ‘NACE’ and presented by Dr Pearson Broomes – focused on five primary areas:
~ The provision of adequate and affordable educational opportunities
~ Enhancing the quality of education
~ Improving student performance and certification
~ Making school a rewarding experience
~ Ensuring that each child benefit from the educational experience
…each area being a predictable cliché of meaningless, general, terms that sound intelligent while essentially saying absolutely nothing.
The committee then goes on to recommend a number of ‘policy initiatives’ like;
…sending scholarship winners to UWI;
…allowing UWI to monopolize tertiary education in Barbados;
…zoning students for secondary schools
…taking 2 schools out to become trade schools
…establishing sixth forms in every school;
… etc etc etc
No doubt the newspaper report is but a brief summary of the committee’s extensive document, and it probably does not do justice to the value of the work done. However even if that is the case, anyone with a modicum of common sense must see that this is nothing but a wish list compiled by a particular segment of the education cartel of Barbados that serves only to pander to their particular interests and pet peeves.
In the first place, how can such an august group of intellectuals spend two years in researching this issue and yet fail to take the time to establish a clear strategic framework for national education in Barbados?
You know! like…
1 – What is it that we are striving to achieve in education in Barbados?
2 – How are we going to measure this achievement?
3 – How well / badly are we doing right now based on this measure?
4 – What are the main factors that impede / encourage success?
5 – Where does the best opportunities lie to improve results being obtained?
Now are these not the kinds of answers that you would expect from a fancy sounding advisory committee on education? Stupseeeee
Now I like Mr. Jeff Broomes the Principal of Alexandria! Any leader who is regularly at odds with his union is likely to be someone that is innovative, creative and actually doing things.
But when he seeks to justify the recommendation for zoning secondary school students (more so than is currently the case) on the excuse that it will improve extracurricular participation, he immediately set himself up for a downgrading by the bushman.
The sad truth is that most of the recommendations articulated by the committee are nothing but doltish ramblings without any basis in logic or common sense.
What UWI What??!!
Everyone except apparently those on this committee knows that one of the only factors that can drive some level of efficiency in Barbados is competition. The main benefit of the proposed University College of Barbados was to provide a practical alternative to the mediocrity currently endemic at Cave Hill, for large numbers of students.
A quick look at St Augustine Campus will show that numerous improvements and innovations only suddenly became ‘viable’ AFTER the establishment of UTT.
In a similar vein, why should UWI be guaranteed the intake of the scholarship winners every year? Why should they not have to compete for these students by offering the best options to stimulate their enrollment? The committee is saying that Barbados should place all their academic eggs in UWI’s broken basket – when far better developmental options may be out there to take our best brains to their maximum potential.
…Hilary must be on that committee….
What zoning what??!!
Notwithstanding the ridiculous ‘benefit’ proposed by Principal Jeff Broomes about improved extra curricular participation, the committee would need to explain the basis upon which it recommends tighter zoning. Why should a parent not have the right to send their child to WHICHEVER school they feel comfortable with – provided that the child meets the 11+ requirements for that school?
What makes Mr. Broomes or any education official more qualified than a parent to make this determination?
~Suppose the parent or a close relative works at the “far-away” school?
~Suppose a grand mother lives next door to the distant school – while parents work in town?
Stupseeee
What sixth form in every school what??!!
Towards what end are they recommending a sixth form in each school?
Unless there is a well thought out strategic goal in mind that drives this proposal with solid facts and data, this sounds just like another arbitrary brainwave that is driven more by the number of senior teaching posts that will be created than by any logical benefits to Barbadian youth.
What is wrong with Community College?
What take TWO secondary schools out to become what trade schools what??!!
Based on what??? Why not take 12 out? Is this just another expensive experiment too? After two years of research you would think that such a recommendation would be based on some clear strategic goals with coherent metrics to support the proposal.
With this poor level of planning being perpetrated on the people of Barbados at the so called ‘National policy level’ it is no wonder that we are at a loss to make sensible national decisions –particularly in crisis times. Does this not sound familiarly like the kind of ‘planning’ that went into Greenland, ABC flyover expansion, Dodds etc?
The real joke is that it is presentations such as these that garner PhD degrees at UWI. No wonder we need to bring experts from over and away to get anything done bout here…
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.