Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Dawn Simmons – Chairman of the North American Region People’s National Congress Reform

14 year old Torture VictimTeen Being Transported to Hospital
14 year old Torture VictimTeen Being Transported to Hospital

The North American Region of the People’s National Congress Reform condemns the most recent heinous acts of torture committed by members of the Guyana Police Force on a fourteen-year old, while in their custody at the Leonora Police Station, Guyana. The shocking photographs published in the Kaieteur News on Saturday October 31, 2009, and appended to this statement provide gruesome evidence of the reprehensible conduct of the police officers.

It is alleged that members of the Police Force, while interrogating a teenager, set fire to his genital area after soaking him with mentholated spirits. He was also burned on his tongue and lips. This is not a singular case, but is the latest of several examples of the pervasive culture of the Police Force which permits such despicable behavior.

In a press statement issued only two days prior to this horrific incident, Guyana’s Parliamentary Opposition Leader, Mr. Robert Corbin of the People’s National Congress (PNCR) warned that the Ruling Party, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP/C) appears to condone torture of individuals in Guyana by its dismissal response to reported allegations of torture. Regrettably, the Administration, which is a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, seems comfortable with the current state of affairs in Guyana. The refusal of the Jagdeo Administration to take serious and drastic action in cases of reported torture coupled with its failure to condemn such behavior leads one to the conclusion that the Guyana Government gives tacit approval to these acts of torture. Moreover, the Government by its inaction conveys the message to the Security Forces that such behavior is acceptable.

14 Year Old Thomas Tortured by Guyana PoliceArticle 2, Paragraph 2 of UN Convention Against Torture clearly states that:

No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.”

The Convention places a direct obligation on the Government to respond positively to ensure that the provisions are not breached. The record of the PPP/C in this area is utterly dismal and this provision continues to be observed in its breach.

Guyanese have not forgotten the brutal torture of Edwin Niles while in the custody of the Guyana Prison Service and the reluctance of either the security forces or the Government to take any action until there was a public outcry. To date, there has been no explanation or known investigation on the torture of Patrick Sumner, Victor Jones, David Zammit and many others by the security forces. Similarly the state-sponsored murder of Journalist Ronald Waddell, informant Bacchus and countless hundreds goes uninvestigated and unpunished. Guyanese ask:”Where is the Justice?”

In January 2008 army personnel, Michael Dunn, Alvin Wilson and Sharth Robertson, made public their allegations that they were tortured by senior officers of the Guyana Defence Force (GDF). Amidst the public outcry, the Government finally announced the appointment of a Board of Inquiry from within the GDF, the same agency against whom the allegations were made. The PNCR challenged this and stated its position on February 7, 2008:

“The only credible way for the investigations, into the allegations of torture, to be done is by an independent commission, consisting of upstanding citizens of this Republic whose integrity is (sic) beyond question.”

The Guyana Government, however, covered up this matter by refusing to publish the report of the so-called inquiry and Mr. Robert Persaud, Minister of Agriculture, choose to disrespect the National Assembly by defending the Army’s torture as roughing up”. The attitude of the PPP/C Administration in condoning torture was further highlighted by their prolonged refusal to debate a motion on torture brought to the National Assembly by the PNCR. When the motion was finally debated, it was evident that the PPP/C had no remorse or any respect for the people of Guyana.

These examples support the contention that the PPP/C Administration has condoned torture in Guyana in breach of their obligations under the UN Convention Against Torture. Not only is the Guyana Government in breach of the UN Convention, but it is also in violation of the Constitution of Guyana, which guarantees every citizen the right to protection from cruel and inhumane treatment. Art. 141 of the Constitution of Guyana clearly states that: “No person shall be subject to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment or other treatment.”

No self-respecting persons, in civilized society, wherever located can allow the state of affairs to continue in Guyana. It was the late great Martin Luther King who said: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” We, in the diaspora, therefore call on the President of Guyana, Bharrat Jagdeo to step down. We further call for the resignation of the Commissioner of Police, Henry Green and that of the Minister of Human Services and Child Welfare, Priya Manichand and the Minister of Home Affairs, Clement Rohee.

The North America Region demands a full and impartial inquiry into the events surrounding this case by an independent body so that the perpetrators of this crime could be identified and punished. We demand that discipline and proper protocol within the ranks of the security forces in Guyana be enforced to ensure that there is no further incidence of torture.  We join our Party, The People’s National Congress Reform in its quest to end these unconstitutional and barbaric activities in Guyana. These atrocities must stop NOW! Protect the rights of the child TODAY… Tomorrow may be too late!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One response to “Police Tortures Teen In Guyana”


  1. Here is the latest on the boy:

    Doctor’s actions reveal a callous indifference beyond belief – GHRA

    November 10, 2009 | By KNews | Filed Under News

    Teenage Torture Case…

    The Guyana Human Rights Association (GHRA) is calling for appropriate disciplinary action to be taken against all officers to the highest levels of the Guyana Police Force who participated in or attempted to cover-up, downplay or minimise the brutality of a 14- year-old torture victim.
    The GHRA is of the view that the internal inquiry ordered by President Bharrat Jagdeo is a subterfuge: another example of the Government protecting those who torture.

    “How can subordinates objectively investigate the actions of the Commissioner of Police in this matter– a legitimate part of the inquiry – much less recommend appropriate disciplinary action should this be found appropriate?” the GHRA said in a press release yesterday.

    From all indications, senior officials knew about the teen’s torture which occurred three days before this newspaper published a photograph of the teen’s horrific injuries.

    The GHRA is also taking the police doctor to task for what it described as his callous approach to his role as a professional.  “Statements contained in a Kaieteur News interview (04/11) with Police Surgeon Mahendra Chand concerning his treatment at Vreed-en-Hoop station of a 15-year-old boy tortured at the Leonora police divisional headquarters reveal a callous indifference beyond belief,” the GHRA stated.

    According to the local human rights body, the manner in which the doctor conducted himself should lead to him immediately being relieved of his post in the Guyana Police Force (GPF) and the equivalent post he holds with respect to the Guyana Prison Service.

    The GHRA pointed to statements made by the doctor during the interview.

    These included, “He said the teenager was brought from the lock-ups with his head concealed”; “His head was covered and I thought he was just another prisoner in a domestic matter who was brought in with injuries and the police were trying to conceal his identity.”; “I did not know who I was treating.”;  “I did not know that the police had anything to do with the prisoner’s injuries.”; “At no time was he aware he was treating a juvenile.”; “Only after he saw the shocking news item in Kaieteur News he realised he had treated a torture victim.”

    The GHRA said it has independently confirmed that during the entire examination, the juvenile’s head was covered by a cloth bag with a string to tighten the neck.

    “Dr. Chand never asked the juvenile his name nor his age nor what had caused the terrible burns and scars on his body.

    In fact, he never spoke to the juvenile at all. The only words the victim overhead the doctor saying to the police were: ‘This person needs to go to hospital,’” the GHRA statement pointed out.

    There was no response from the policemen present but an ointment was afterwards given to the juvenile by the police who told him that the doctor had left it for him and that he should rub it on himself.

    According to the GHRA, everything about Dr. Chand’s interview suggests that it is Dr. Chand’s normal practice to remain as ignorant as possible of what he is involved with, no doubt in order to avoid accusations of complicity in torture.

    “Unfortunately, silence in this case really does suggest consent, which puts Dr. Chand morally in the dock with the other members of the GPF who bear varying degrees of responsibility for what occurred in Leonora police-station or its cover-up.”

    The GHRA said that any claim that Dr. Chand was innocently rather than determinedly ignorant of what he was involved with is challenged by his apparent failure to ask even the most basic questions.

    “Why he was examining a youth in police custody at that hour without the presence of parents?  What caused the brutality sustained by the juvenile, apart from the burns? Why the head of the subject in front of him was bagged? What was the age, name and personal details of the severely injured and dehydrated subject in front of him? Where, when and how the severe burns and other marks were acquired?”

    The GHRA stated that everything about the interview smacks of a business as usual approach, in which Dr. Chand hears no evil, sees no evil and says nothing.

    Police Commissioner Henry Greene stated: “that from the information he received, the doctor had indicated that the prisoner was okay.”

    According to the GHRA, if indeed this indifference to brutality is normal practice for the Police Surgeon, it goes some way to help the average citizen understand the otherwise inexplicable brutality of which police ranks are regularly accused.

    “When the official medical representative to the police force is not outraged by such treatment why should police ranks act differently?”

    The human rights body pointed out that Principle #2 of the Medical Principles applicable to persons in detention approved by the UN General Assembly Resolution 37/194 of 18 December 1982 states,  “It is a gross contravention of medical ethics, as well as an offence under applicable international instruments for health personnel, particularly physicians to engage actively or passively in acts which constitute participation in, complicity in, incitement to or attempts to commit torture or other cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

    The GHRA is of the view that the actions that Dr. Chand took and those he failed to take constitute a dereliction of duty sufficient to meet the test of  ‘passive complicity’ with torture.

    The body further reminded the Guyana Government that having ratified the UN Torture Convention it is legally bound to act on this matter.

    The GHRA is also calling on the Guyana Medical Council to investigate whether the gross breach of medical ethics, not to mention gross incompetence displayed in this incident warrants serious disciplinary action from the medical profession itself.

    GHRA is also of the view that appointments of professionals to posts such as Police Surgeon and Prison Doctor should be made by and regularly rotated by the Medical Council rather than by the institutions or Ministries involved.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading