← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

press-releaseAfter years of providing educational and environmental programmes to tens of thousands of children and adults, Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary closed on Monday to the public.

“The last day went well, but most people were too hurt and emotional to really speak to me,” said Harry Roberts, General Manager of the Sanctuary.   “The closing of GHNS is similar to losing a close friend, so much has been extended not only by me but some of the most committed and cooperative staff that one could find anywhere in the world.”

A small maintenance and security staff will maintain the bird aviaries and provide minimal ecosystem services until a  final decision is made about the future of the Sanctuary.  Roberts was pensive about his staff.  “Through their efforts we ran a world class attraction and educational centre, unmatched anywhere in the Caribbean, not only for visitors but for Barbadians as well.   I can only hope that it is possible for the Sanctuary to be re-opened as quickly as possible,” said Roberts.

Sanctuary officials confirmed that there is strong support from various Ministries, and that there have been positive discussions with government about keeping the Sanctuary open on an interim basis until a permanent action plan for the overall green space at Graeme Hall could be developed.
In 2007, over 6,000 Barbadians signed a Friends of Graeme Hall petition that had been submitted to the previous administration in favor of preserving the approximately 240-acre green area at Graeme Hall, and to protect  its RAMSAR wetland and wildlife reserve with low-density open and recreational upland buffers.

As the largest and most significant green space remaining in the urban South Coast communities between the Airport and Bridgetown, the proposed green area would include the designated 81-acre RAMSAR wetland approved under the international Convention on Wetlands, the 35-acre Sanctuary, private lands owned by Clico and other smaller landowners, and recreational lands.

However, the undeveloped lands outside of the 81-acre RAMSAR wetland are currently zoned for residential and urban corridor development according to the current Physical Development Plan.  Officials acknowledged that if such development happened, it would likely kill a majority of the mangrove woodland and wetland ecosystem within Graeme Hall’s RAMSAR site.

Officials also said that the area needed to be preserved and managed using sound scientific approaches to ensure the health of the wetland and its upland buffers, and that much of the information needed by government to develop a “Master Action Plan” for the Graeme Hall area had already been produced and consolidated by Coastal Zone Management Unit staff.

More information can be found at www.graemehall.com/press.htm and www.graemehallnationalpark.org .


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

14 responses to “Graeme Hall Nature Sanctuary Closes”


  1. We will stay tune for the next saga of this mess.


  2. Now, let me see if I have this right.

    First, there is a new aircraft that Barbados wants to have land at the airport to disgorge its 500 or so tourists once or twice a week. A condition of this aircraft being allowed to land is that housing and other development has to be restricted from an approach thaty includes Christ Church Parish Church and extends almost to Oistins.

    Of these 500 tourists, just how many is it estimated are going to pay their tourist dollars to visit Graeme Hall and its 35 acres? My guess is one in every two full flights. So it is Bajan tax dollars, rather than tourist demand and dollars, that will support Graeme Hall and the 6000 signatories to the petition.

    Just outside the landing zone for the airport is Graeme Hall and “the largest and most significant green space remaining in the urban South Coast communities between the Airport and Bridgetown, the proposed green area would include the designated 81-acre RAMSAR wetland approved under the international Convention on Wetlands, the 35-acre Sanctuary, private lands owned by Clico and other smaller landowners, and recreational lands”.

    I have no problems with “the 35-acre Sanctuary”, but I have a great many problems with “private lands owned by Clico and other smaller landowners, and recreational lands”. So will their owners.

    Just who in hell do the Graeme Hall people think they are to try to dictate to the owners of the surrounding 46 acres of land (whether these include Clico or not) and insist that these lands be used as support and adde to Graeme Hall?

    If Graeme Hall cannot stand on its own surrounded by urbanization as it spreads outward from Bridgetown (due to the development of our society and national requirements) tough. We can drain it and add it to the urban sprawl and thus reduce the travel time to work in Bridgetown for Bajans with families, which means that parents have more quality time with their children.

    Then their is the question as to whether we ought to surrender our sovereign rights over our own country in favour of RAMSAR. Since when did we Bajans elect RAMSAR to the Barbados parliament?

    I am all in favour of government taking over and running Graeme Hall. I am not in favour of government compulsorily acquiring adjoining lands, whether or not Clico owns some of them, to the detriment of Bajans who may want to own homes closer to Bridgetown and their work. Please don’t give me that nonsense about Central Park in New York.

    Graeme Hall is a preserve and fad for the rich who can afford to focus their attentions on wetlands, because their collective need to focus on the basics of survival does not exist. And they frankly do not care at all for people who DO have to focus on the basics of survival while trying to raise families.

    But does this tactic being used by Graeme Hall remind anyone of anything? Let me refresh your memories. Peter Allard is the “directing mind” behind Graeme Hall. Peter Allard is the “directing mind” behind Nelson Barbados Group Limited. The whole tactic used by this individual is to take our country and the governance of it away from us and place it in external hands, like the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and RAMSAR.

    Without Mr Allard, we will run and protect our country of which, although this is certainly going to be a surprise to Mr Allard, Graeme Hall is a part.


  3. Interesting that so few post on this issue… as expected for this site!


  4. We must listen very carefully to people like BWWR, for they would also tell the people of New York that Central Park is “a preserve and fad for the rich who can afford to focus their attentions on wetlands, because their collective need to focus on the basics of survival does not exist.” Can BWWR or anyone else imagine New York without the Central Park wetlands and the recreational areas around it?

    BWWR is also not aware that it was the government of Barbados that established the RAMSAR wetland designation around the Clico lands at Graeme Hall. Building on that land will cause a public outcry that Barbados rarely sees.

    BWWR is carefully avoiding the fact that the majority of lands at Graeme Hall are owned by the people of Barbados and that the people will decide what to do with it, not the likes of BWWR and his rich friends. He may even be shocked to learn that some of his rich friends are on the Petition to make the area a permanent reserve. Their signatures are on file.


  5. What has been clear to us for sometime is this matter has been clouded in politics from the get go. The obvious intransigence shown by successive governments to settle is proof of it. There is more to this matter than fighting the cause of keeping our only wetland fully operational.

    We hope that me is being provocative. BU has promoted this issue every chance we have gotten. The BU family maybe showing some fatigue on this issue. To be honest there is some inevitability at how it is playing out.


  6. My wife and I are not rich and live in New York. We like what New York City’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg says:

    “For millions of New Yorkers, Central Park is not just a park. It is our front yard. It is our picnic spot, our playground, our nature preserve… and our field of dreams.”


  7. Listen wunna, New York is NOT surrounded by beaches and beautiful ocean. It needs a park like Central Park. New York is NOT a tropical paradise. Barbados is both. AND we have nuff parks. Stop trying to compare New York with Barbados. They are not at all similar.


  8. BWWR, Barbados is not all and only beach and sand. Parkland is often more pleasant to visit, cool, people can stay cleaner (sand-free), and a mangrove forest (this one) is unique.

    GHNS can be on the doorstep of many residences, rich and poor, within walking distance. Playspaces in the developments here are somewhat lacking and often ill-kept.

    The similarities we are using between NY and Bim are concerned with a green open space within an urban area, no other comparisons need be made.


  9. permres // December 17, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    “Parkland is often more pleasant to visit….” Queens Park, The Garrison, Farley Hill and so on?

    “GHNS can be on the doorstep of many residences, rich and poor, within walking distance….” And the additional 46 acres that GHS is trying to claim can provide a larger pool of visitors by building houses on them that will have the double effect of allowing people to live closer to Bridgetown and their work and then they and their families will have more time to sample the joys of GHS. This, instead of allowing GHS to force the owners of the surrounding 46 acres to hand them over to GHS. Also, how many of these poor Bajans that you cite are going to visit Graeme Hall? They are going to the beach, which is free, from the points of view of both preference and economics.

    “Playspaces in the developments here are somewhat lacking and often ill-kept….”. Really? Just in the developments? Generally play spaces run by private developments and government seem to be run down – because Bajans prefer the beach – so what makes you think GHS will be different?

    The comparison between Barbados and New York is rubbish. If you want the sand-free environment in that area surrounded by magnificent colonial buildings and mature trees and benches with health-conscious Bajans jogging (like Central Park) and racehorses training around you (Central Park has riders like Hyde Park) go to the Garrison – a large green space almost in the middle of Bridgetown and on top of the PM’s office. Also, right next door is the Museum with its courtyards and quiet areas where you can have a happy, sand-free day and where the money you pay to get in will go to improving the Museum so that our young can visit and learn something of their history, instead of visiting a shrine to Allard the Almighty and giving it their dollars.

    If you want quiet and rural tranquility with magnificent views, go to Farley Hill National Park (and this one truly can claim to be “National” as it is owned by the people of Barbados, unlike Graeme Hall that has no right to call itself “National” – yet).

    Then, there is always good old Queen’s Park. That is a place that needs to have tax dollars spent on it, rather than a swamp that existed until now quite happily without the hysteria generated by Allard and Co.

    Don’t get me wrong. I would love to see the government take over Graeme Hall and finally legitimize its claim to be “National”, rather than a failed business enterprise of a billionaire scion of and supported by Allarco. HOWEVER, it is nonsense to try to force the government to compulsorily acquire some of the most valuable real estate in Barbados (the 46 acres NOT owned by Graeme Hall) and reduce it in value and add it to Graeme Hall to the prejudice of its present owners, just because some self-appointed international agency (RAMSAR) that will declare ANYTHING protected, says this is wetland at the behest of a Canadian billionaire with a very large agenda. NO, NO, NO!

    The very premise of Graeme Hall as it now exists is tainted and it is designed for a minute amount of interested tourists and a few Bajans who are interested at the moment. But that too will change. Something, maybe a water park, will come along (not necessarily in that area) and then it will be the new fad and Graeme Hall will slip back into the state in which it has existed for many centuries before Allard the Almighty. And Bajans will enjoy, free as they have always done, our beaches and sea and we will put up with the trifling inconvenience of sand in our swim suits – as we have always done.


  10. BWWR, sincerely, many thanks for your perceptive reply! I await responses from those who think differently, and are better informed than myself.


  11. but do we need more concrete in that area….and so what if he is a billionaire. The point remains that if he had not invested in GH we would not have it AT ALL.

    Sec ondly have you been to Holetown recntly? Have you been there when it rains? Go take alook and see what happens when we just concretize everything!

    I dissgree with your assertion that its just a few tourists and locals. BS. I suggest that you look back in your crystal ball and recognise that JUST LIKE NYC and countless other places URBAN spread has resulted in a decesre quality of life, decrease access to green spaces ,fresh air etc etc AND the locals in these places are forecd to com e up with ingenious ways to get a little chlorophyll such as plating a roof garden…

    FYI Barbados is a tropical islnad with rain forests that unfortuantely are being destroyed more and more each year.

    It also beaches with drecreasing access to locals as well as MAJOR pollution issues…so I dont see how you could think that way about GH


  12. Can’t say that we agree with you on this BWWR. Unfortunately politics seem to be muddying this matter but in light of the disappearing windows to the sea, the general abuse of our environment by John Public, the battle to preserve this green spot is of national importance. It sends a message that as a country we care about our environment, for those who do not it should serve as impetus to change uncaring attitudes.


  13. @BWWR

    The Ramsar designation of 81 acres at Graeme Hall was signed by the representatives of the duly elected Government of Barbados and not Allard. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Unlike you they seem to have seen the value of that ecosystem to Barbados and decided not to follow your recommendation that “We can drain it and add it to the urban sprawl and thus reduce the travel time to work in Bridgetown for Bajans with families, which means that parents have more quality time with their children.”

    Why not housing on the Garrison Savannah or the Esplanade in front of Government Headquarters as well? Both are even closer to Bridgetown and would reduce the travel time to work in Bridgetown, freeing up all that quality time for parents to spend with their children. That would be a nice addition to the “urban sprawl” that you so admire and desire.

    I think your comment speaks for itself and once again we are in no doubt as to where you stand on preserving the environment and green spaces.


  14. Oh, Nostradamus, still haven’t learned to read I see – and the lessons can be free these days.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading