← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent


SIX MEN’S BAY in St Peter is the largest remaining coastal pond on the West Coast and a marina should only be constructed there if the developers are prepared to replace what will be lost by destroying the pond.

This is the recommendation of Professor Robin Mahon, director of the Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES) at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill. “The proposal to excavate [Six Men’s] into a marina should only be approved if the developers are obliged to mitigate the loss of function by building water-retention structures upstream that prevent the water from entering the marina and also to replace that function by contributing to the enhancement of other ponds along the coast, such as the ones at Weston and Holetown.

Source: Nation Newspaper

Heywoods-barbados

The BU family would have recognized by now that we are concerned about the lack of a Physical Development Plan for Barbados. We have been supported in our cause by several members of the BU family with Anonymous x and Sundowner leading the way. In fact there is a parallel between the lack of an immigration policy and our physical development approach in Barbados. Noticeable in the developed countries is the forward planning which is evident when building roads, bridges, cities, industrial estates etc. An integral aspect to planning physical development is to anticipate the impact physical development will have on the eco-system and takes steps to mitigate.

It is routine as far as we know for the Town Planning department to request environmental impact studies to be undertaken and submitted as part of the request for development permissions. Barbadians to date have been loathed to participate in this process which encourages feedback from citizens. We are prepared to say that Barbadians have themselves partially to blame for the runaway position which now exist i.e. Town Planning and developers moving ahead with development and not factoring John Citizen’s position. An example of this is the environmental impact study which was undertaken in the ABC Highway Project. Our recollection suggests that such an important piece to that project was not appropriately managed in the interest of Barbadians.

They are some who have resigned themselves to the fact the West Coast development has passed the point of no return. We listened to Minister Richard Sealy who suggested as much a few weeks ago on national radio. However in the case of the Six Men’s Marina Project it has been suggested that if the development is not MANAGED, it will have negative consequences to our eco-systems and coastline in the future.

The UWI researcher called for the few saltwater ponds left on the West Coast to be protected and enhanced with vegetation.He said that if such steps were not being taken, developers were in effect getting a “free ride on the backs of taxpayers” since it was taxpayers who eventually had to bear the cost of replacing the lost services these ecosystems used to provide; it was also taxpayers who lost a source of cultural identity, natural beauty and opportunity for recreation by the destruction of these ecosystems.

Source: Nation Newspaper

The time has come for Barbadians to start to pay attention to how current development will impact the environment in years to come. We have an obligation as human beings on the earth to protect our environment. If for some of us we can’t connect to such a noble ideal, we may consider doing it for our children and future generations. We have to rely on our environment to survive as island states. The decisions we take about our physical development MUST factor for breakage in the future. As the Americans say, it is a no-brainer. Why then do we have the unsustainable position of out of control physical development in Barbados?

Some say it can be described in one word, GREED!


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

27 responses to “Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies Director Speaks-out About Six Men's Marina Development”

  1. Micro Mock Engineer Avatar
    Micro Mock Engineer

    David,

    While you may not agree with its contents, there is a National Physical Development Plan. The latest revision I am aware of was amended in 2003 and approved on October 19th 2006.
    Copies may be purchased at the price of $200.00 at the Town and Country Development Planning Office and are also available for viewing at that office. IMHO it should be available freely on the internet, but here is the table of contents if you’re interested:

    http://www.townplanning.gov.bb/downloads/pdp2003/toc.pdf

    I recall that Town Hall meetings were held many years ago to discuss the current version and its predecessor, but as has become customary, not many people attended these, preferring it would seem to voice their concerns after the fact anonymously on blogs and call-in programs 🙂

  2. Micro Mock Engineer Avatar
    Micro Mock Engineer

    … I also recall reports in the media of a further amendment to the PDP in relation to the agricultural land allocation being approved by parliament in late December 2007 (absent the then opposition party who were boycotting over the Hardwood issue).


  3. @MME

    We regard this plan in the same way we did the National Strategic Plan. Often it is not the plan but the execution. We are sure that like the BU household we can identify development which has taken place in Barbados which is contrary to the plan. Under the last administration we saw many instances of it. Maybe we can cite the location of Greenland in the Scotland District which is prone to soil erosion. We can cite the development in Warrens which is haphazard at best. The construction of buildings in the reserves etc.

    So we have a document but look around Barbados. Do you seen the result of a plan? Let us assume that Barbadians are not as active in the feedback process as you say shouldn’t we be able to rely on our Town Planners and government to perform in the interest of Barbados.


  4. The PDP seem to apply only to local average or non-partisan bajans. Since 2003 to present, I have seen so many amendments to this plan to suit and benefit the favoured. It’s time the public have a bigger say in the physical development on this country. Maybe, just maybe , this would ruffle the feathers of certain individuals.


  5. Maybe the solution maybe in the touted Town Planning Authority. Currently the Prime Minister or minister who has responsibility can do as they please with a stroke of a pen without giving two hoots about a PDP. Barbados is small and citizens understand how the process works. Maybe this explains why John Public is not motivated to participate.

    We all remember the land which was purchased on the West Coast a few years back by people close to the former government. In the USA the capital gains on that property would have had to be shared with the previous owner. No such luck in Barbados.


  6. I know a lady who was trying unsuccessfully for the last 8 years until this present administration to get a small parcel of land on a 3 acre lot taken off so that her son could build on. This piece of land is rab rocky soil, yet a man with connections got the full acres right next to hers subdivided and made a killing out of the profits of the sale. Talk about PDP? It’s only for certain people. The lady’s son, a very brilliant guy, has since migrated and another country now benefits from us educating him and denying him the right to a piece of the rock unless he buys it from COW.

  7. NO MORE MARINAS EVER AGAIN Avatar
    NO MORE MARINAS EVER AGAIN

    Write all the Physical Development Plans, newspaper articles and irate blog submissions you like. It won’t make a scrap of difference.

    Because Mother Nature can’t read. And since you can’t fool Mother Nature she’s already making us – and subsequent Bajans – pay heavily for messing with her.

    For millions of years the sea washed-up and along what became known as Heywoods Beach. Bringing sand, taking sand, washing sand and repeating the cycle whenever Motha felt like it.

    Then came the greedy environmental rapists to build (?) Port St. Charles.

    Causing great confusion for Mother Nature. Who now takes sand, washes it and doesn’t know where to replace it.

    In fact most of the Mother Nature removed sand is re-deposited in the ugly gash – or channel – gauged-out by the plunderers and if left to build-up would prevent them from sailing their pathetic little boats in and out of their oh-so-exclusive harbour to enjoy polo on Sundays.

    So they pump the sand away. Yes, every so often – like now – they spend days pumping sand from their illegal channel and try to deposit it on the beaches to the left and right.

    But Mother Nature is angry. And for revenge quickly sends it back again to the Port St. Charles gangsters to block their channel.

    Depleting our fragile public beaches until all the sand is again washed away. And the lunatics bring their pumping equipment again to make sure they can sail in and out once a week. Or not at all in the case of most Port St. Charles dwellers who obviously don’t care about the poor local slobs without yachts and beaches.

    Is this really the Barbados we – and David Thompson – want?

    Or do we Bajans who voted for him have zero say in the matter.


  8. Before we even start cussing david thompson I think we have not spent sufficient time cussing owen arthur.

    My reason for saying that is simple – if we don’t recognise and learn from our past mistakes – we are doomed to repeat them.

    Owen arthur has positioned us to be a failed state – look at his town planning decisions ,look at his land fetching the highest dollar economic policy,look at his open door immigration policy for guyanese and other peoples,look at his cost over runs and stealing of the taxpayers dollars and in the process fattening his bank accounts.

    Must I go on?

    If we don’t take the time to let that information soak into our consiousness and subconsiousness – then as soon as we get vex with thompson – we would rush to put back the BLP – the very perpetrator of this crime against Barbados.

    However Yes,Yes and a thousand times yes – we want to know definitively that David Thompson is listening to the cries of the people and the fact that we are being denied everything that was ours by right – the right to free access to the beach – the right to have a decent standard of living and not allow it to be depressed by illegal migrants,the right to leave our sea coasts,and our lands,gullies and ponds – in a pristine state for our future genrations.

    We seem to be spitting in the air and the spit is coming right back into our faces.

    David thompson seems to be guilty as owen arthur was of not talking directly to his people and telling us what are his plans and policy on six mens;
    on planning decisions given and projects not yet implemented which are to the detriment of Barbados;
    what is his immigration policy oncitizenship etc for migrants legal or otherwise.

    Some of us and I include myself in this lot – seemed to have gotten the impression that the DLP was reading from the same page in the book as we – I hope for this country’s sake that we weren’t given a flase impression.

    The jury is still out on that.


  9. Check that development in Road View opposite Sweet Home. there use to be a wide water channel there, now the developers have changed and narrowed it causing havoc for the residents of Sweet Home Gap. Water now rises up to 4 feet and floods the shop at the bottom of the gap and makes the road impassable. Must we bajans always have to be inconveneinced by there greedy developers whose only objective is to make millions even at the expense of others? That poor shopkeeper at the bottom of Sweet Home Gap had to close her business after spending lots of money to renovate the building. This is victimisation.


  10. Check that development south of Paynes Bay methodist church. If I remember correctly, we were told that only a few of the trees there would be removed for the construction. Today almost all if not all the trees are gone. So much for the PDP. You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all the people all of the time


  11. There is nothing wrong with development but it is the kind of development that is still taking place across our country and it is time that it stops. We have to be mor e vocal.

    Yes when we get vex with David some persons will do like you say anon and go with mia . My one one is that I wont vote for a BOY!

    I will do like scout and all the Guyanese in Guyana RUN!

    You mean to tell me that my forepparents and WE the people of Barbados decided we would give our blood sweat and tears and this is the thanks we get from both governments well I will apply for legal status somewhere once it aint here!

    If the politicians dotn care why should we work so hard so that people can come and live off of us and be disrespectful at it!


  12. “Before we even start cussing david thompson I think we have not spent sufficient time cussing owen arthur.”

    with thinking (and that is being generous) like this, is it any wonder that we find ourselves doing the same thing over and over?

    “No more marinas ever again” – I warned you before. We look for scapegoats of convenience.


  13. the right to leave our sea coasts,and our lands,gullies and ponds – in a pristine state for our future genrations.

    I have to w0nder how many Bajans really care about these matters one iota.

    Just go to a beach after a bank holiday weekend and observe the chicken bones, garbage and trash left all about the place by nasty, don’t give a damn Bajans for someone else to clean up. Don’t even talk about the vast amount of garbage and junk that Bajans dispose of willy-nilly in the gullies and illegal dump sites. “Out of sight, out of mind” seems to be the operative principle for many everyday Bajans.


  14. When I go hiking with my friends I see the destruction of the landscape. This is littered with Fridges, stoves , galvanise you name it.

    Bajans seem not to realise that they will be killing themselves if this garbage goes into our water system.

    I dont know what to say I am so upset with us; what is wrong with doing the right thing!

    And most times it is all for the love of money that we kill each other!


  15. While former ministers have been busy collecting awards from world bodies, we have failed on the ground to sensitize our people about caring for our environment. For BU the litmus test is in how Barbadians respect the environment. When our citizens show respect our leaders maybe compelled to do the same.


  16. I’m seeing thousands of arable land going into housing yet a single lot for your child to build, as a poor man, you’re application is rejected. Some beautiful land from Foursqare to Six Roads have just been approved. This land grows some fantastic produce but the big boys want it. Owen did the raping and it seem David has taken the baton and is running with it. If the average bajan wants a house he has to buy one of them match boxes from COW


  17. Remember, Owen had already approve from Six Roads up to Beulah corner for housing by COW.Another plantation with beautiful soil gone through the drain. A few residence on the left side of the road going towards Bushy Park are now being pressured, it is alleged, by COW to sell out.


  18. JC, my friend, you are one of the few on this website who speaks pure sense. You wrote:

    “When I go hiking with my friends I see the destruction of the landscape. This is littered with Fridges, stoves , galvanise you name it.

    Bajans seem not to realise that they will be killing themselves if this garbage goes into our water system.

    I dont know what to say I am so upset with us; what is wrong with doing the right thing!”

    I don’t know who wrote it, but someone said, “We have seen the enemy, AND THE ENEMY IS US.”

    COW? Just another convenient scapegoat.


  19. The actions of some stupid Barbadians who litter does not absolve the elite who plunder and rate our small island.

  20. Krzysztof Skubiszewski Avatar
    Krzysztof Skubiszewski

    Thank you anotherview – don’t let the island’s chronic littering problem divert us from the rape of Barbados by unscrupulous greedy gangsters.

    If you want other distractions how about our disgraceful and dangerous roads filled with potholes caused largely by COW and his fellow bandits.

    Or speeding “public” service vehicles with the argument that “the brakes failed” when they overturn at the bottom of a hill and kill and maim people.

    Let’s stick here to the land plunderers.


  21. “Mahon pointed to the Sands development currently underway south of Sandy Lane; developers were allowed to destroy a small coastal pond rather than being required to protect it and enhance its function. This pond, he said, could have been incorporated into the design as an eco-feature, had been done at the Colony Club along the same coast. ”

    Really would be interesting to know what the recommendations of CZMU were on this development. I am willing to lay a bet that they recommended against the type of development implemented in favour of somethign along the lines of what Dr. Mahon suggested.

    But CZMU can only recommend and advise. Being a coastal development the final decision on this development would have come from The Minister.


  22. Thank you Dr. Mahon. You are a smart guy and honest too. A good Bajan.

    Yes indeed the Sands development destroyed the pond which was almost opposite where the Coach House restaurant used to be and the destruction was absolutely unnecessary. Indeed the pond could have indeed an enhancing feature. Months t was pointed out to me by my child who goes to school along that route. If a 14 year noticed it surely the experts and the permission granters have also noticed.

    I know Road View very well. And indeed in the past 40+ years there was no flooding opposite Sweet Home Gap. If the shopkeeper has been inconvenience is there some lawyer out there who can help. Any flooding in that area is likely to make the flooding at Weston in 1995 when the Great Carew died look like nothing at all.

    I don’t know if we remembered that Pastor Cuke preach a sermon at Carew’s funeral about the foolish man who built his house upon the sand as though Carew’s death was his own fault. Please note that there is now a large 2 storey house exactly on the spot where Carew’s house used to stand. And we hear no sermon’s about foolish men building on the sand, and still nobody has been prosecuted for causing Carew’s death. Carew’s death was NOT cause by an act of God. It was not caused because Carew was foolish. It was caused because the landowner upstream build a solid road (in effect a dam) on his land across the water course. When the 8 inch rainfall came, the water build up across the dam and when the volume of water became great enough it ruptured the dam and flooded Weston. The government spent a lot of money resiting people in little boxes at Bakers, St. Peter and not a word to or about the landowner whose foolishness and greed killed a man and destroyed a village.

    One day coming soon we will get 8 inches of rain in 8 hours again. And may God help those of us who are on the West Coast at the time.

    Tell the pastors to preach that.

    Tell the policy makers to do their jobs.


  23. We let the investors who came here yesterday, or who have never come here at all believe that they know this landscape better than we do.

    They do not.

    And maybe when they suffer property loss they will sue us because we knew and yet we gave them permission to build in terribly unsuitable places. We don’t care as long as we can spend their money.

    The developers are not the only greedy ones. They are greedy and ignorant.

    We are greedy and knowing.


  24. Scout

    while you are attacking Arthur for land between Four Square and Six Roads going out of agriculture, please ask DonvilleInniss and Adriel Brathwaite to stop their housing development on agricultural land formerly owned by Vincent Layne also near Six Roads.


  25. It seems to be standard policy in Barbados to replace rivers,ponds and water courses with concrete channels.

    I have a gut feeling that sooner or later we are going to have flooding of immense proportions in Holetown.

    In the “Old days” The Ponds and rivers on the West Coast acted as a buffer against flooding in areas like Holetown giving residents time to dig a trench to the sea to “let de gully out.

    The Limegrove development will be the testing point next time we have a real flood in Holetown.

    According to the “Engineers and Planners” it is supposed to be safe from flooding.

    We shall sea.


  26. Anotherview & Krzysztof Skubiszewski, fully agree, no argument here. The irony is that natural justice cannot be flaunted with impunity by either COW or any west coast developer, even tho’ temporary successes may lead to a sense of infallibility.

    The Sands project is continually sinking. I have been told that it may ultimately have to be abandoned. Now that would be a stunning reversal! Just wait, as J has said, for the ‘next’ 8″ rainfall. Dem Corinthian columns en gine hold up nut’in!


  27. The Devil
    I’m not attacking Owen Arthur alone on the Six Roads project, David Thompson in the last budget speech designated that area for housing. Both former and present P.M. are cowtonguing up to the COW. He seem to be dangling something above their heads.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

    Trending

    Discover more from Barbados Underground

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading