← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Tee White

On 25 February, the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, issued a press statement in which he announced the expansion of the US’ Cuba-related visa restriction policy. Under this expansion, the US declared that going forward, it would restrict the issuing of visas to foreign government officials who are in any way connected with Cuba’s medical missions. This restriction would also apply to their immediate families. In justifying its new move, the State Department put forward the deliberately fabricated lie that Cuba’s medical missions are a form of forced labour and this action is intended to curb the “exploitation and forced labour of Cuban workers”. 

With this announcement, the current US administration signaled to the entire Caribbean that it intends to intensify its efforts to isolate and strangle Cuba and that to achieve this, it would directly attack the provision of health care to thousands of people across the region. This callous and inhumane attitude of directly holding the welfare of ordinary citizens hostage in order to achieve its political objective of overthrowing the Cuban government has been a consistent feature of the over 60 year-long US blockade of Cuba.  In the now infamous memorandum 499 issued on 6 April 1960, by then Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, Lestor D. Mallory, the US stated clearly that in its aim to overthrow the Cuban government, it would carry out actions designed to bring about hunger and desperation among ordinary Cubans. The recent expansion of the visa restriction policy by Rubio is based on this same outlook but now the aim is not only to cause suffering to ordinary Cubans but also to people across the Caribbean who are in need of health care. 

As a result of hundreds of years of enslavement and colonial oppression, coupled with the region’s neo-colonial position within the global capitalist system, health care systems within the region are woefully inadequate to meet the population’s needs. As a result, thousands of people are unable to access appropriate health care. This situation is compounded by the fact that there is a brain drain of regional health care professionals who are routinely recruited into North America and Europe. Generally, across the region, access to health care is a market commodity that individuals must pay for privately. Those who cannot afford it have to fall back on the public health care system which is massively under resourced and unable to respond adequately to the demands on it. Not surprisingly, in this situation, the Caribbean has some of the world’s highest rates of death from non-communicable diseases. It is to fill this breach that Cuba carries out medical co-operation with many countries across the region. In some states, Cuban medical personnel play a critical role in the public health care system and withdrawing them would lead to its collapse. 

Given this reality, the response from the entire region has been unanimous in rejecting this latest US move. Regardless of political persuasion, media houses, political leaders, Cuban solidarity organisations and others have come out in one voice to reject Rubio’s attack as a malicious assault on our sovereignty and the welfare of our people. CNSC adds it voice to this chorus and calls on the entire region to stick together and defend the vital medical co-operation that Cuba offers us. We must stick together and cannot allow the divide and conquer strategy that Trump used against us in his first presidency.  As one we must demand that this policy is withdrawn and that the US respect the sovereignty of our countries. 

Say no to this new US attack on our sovereignty!

Defend Cuba’s medical co-operation with the Caribbean!



Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

61 responses to “Entire Caribbean rejects Rubio’s attack!”


  1. Trump volatility: Caribbean vulnerability

    TWO EVENTS OCCURRED last week which brought the English-speaking Caribbean directly into the crosshairs of the Donald Trump presidency.

    The first was the announcement that Caribbean governments with Cuban medical programmes would be categorised as supporters of “forced labour”, with the threat of United States visa restrictions to offending countries.

    The second was the publication in the New York Times, (though not officially confirmed), of a list of countries facing pending US travel bans. Divided into three categories, the sanctioned countries were grouped as red, for those facing all-travel bans (Cuba); orange for those with restricted visa access (Haiti); and yellow for those with a probationary 60 days to “address concerns”. English-speaking Caribbean states of Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St Kitts-Nevis, and St Lucia were included in the third.

    Given the disruptive nature of the Trump presidency, it was only a matter of time before the English-Caribbean was affected. Trump’s open quarrels with the US’ closest Western allies and hemispheric partners like Western Europe and Canada should have provided clear warning of our vulnerability to his volatility.

    Further, the selection of Cuban-descendant Marco Rubio, as Secretary of State, has brought Cuba-CARICOM relations frontally in Trump’s foreign policy agenda. Just as the proximity of South African Elon Musk to Trump has placed the South African government under direct US scrutiny, then similarly has Rubio’s presence meant greater attention to Cuba. Relatedly, while Rubio might be less influential in shaping Trump’s European or hemispheric foreign and trade policies, Caribbean-Cuba relations may be a theatre where he feels more empowered.

    Any hope, therefore, of the Caribbean “avoiding” Trump how timid students avoid school bullies, is unrealistic. Trump will “bring trouble” to the Caribbean despite our best efforts to act in accordance with our limited global significance, and despite our obsequious declarations of US friendship. Trump is too driven by demonstrations of force of will rather than goodwill, to be a positive Caribbean neighbour; too volatile to offer promises of stability, good faith and normality.

    The practical advice to the Caribbean is to expect anything, literally. Trump pursues his policy goals without “reasonableness”. His use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport non-citizens, and his categorisation of anti-genocide student protestors as terrorists, are cases in point. As the Wall Street Journal has noted, the administration needs to be careful that “it’s targeting real promoters of terrorism, not… deporting anyone with controversial political views”.

    Given Trump’s volatility, the Caribbean should also be ready to adjust its relations away from the US. Just as Trinidad and Tobago is now forced to consider joining the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) because Britain has imposed visa requirements upon Trinidadians, then so should the Caribbean adjust to Trump’s redefined USA as an antagonistic neighbour. It will be impossible to develop meaningful US-Caribbean relations based principally on bad faith, threats and force.

    Tennyson Joseph is Associate Professor of Political Science at North Carolina Central University. Email tjoe2008@live.com

    Source: Nation

  2. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    THE TALKSHOP OF CARIBBEAN LEADERS

  3. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    UNITED STATES PARCEL SERVICE SACKS 10,000 EMPLOYEES WITH ANOTHER 10K IN THE CROSSHAIRS

    It’s all goin’ 2 hell, folks!!!

    #AnotherDayAnotherPilaCRAP*

  4. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    IF BLACK FOLKS THINK TIMES WERE GONNA GET BETTER FOR ‘EM – THINK AGAIN


  5. The current policies, tariffs, antagonistic actions against allies and mass firings are going to crash the US economy.

    There is absolutely no doubt about this.

    The only question is the scale of the recession. My thought is that the scale will be driven by the duration of these policies and how strong the international, former trading partners, pivot to other trade.

    However, the incoming recession, however strong, will adversely impact all economies globally, including those of the Caribbean.

    On the Cuba / Caribbean relationship, the old adage, ‘he who walks away…” springs to mind.

    However, in this case, principles and pragmatism may actually co-exist, as a temporary agreement to alienate Cuba is no guarantee of friendly co-operation subsequent.

    From this, the PM has taken the right stance.

    Bridges must be built with such as Brazil and other balanced South American nations, African continent, EU and Asia, in order to survive.

    What matters most is survival, being energy, water, food, medical and housing.

    Communications and transport are necessary infrastructure also.

    When a country has the above, everything else moves from there.


  6. On a point related to but tangential to the article posted, one must consider the co-ordinated attack and embracing of ‘anti-immigrant’ views.

    Of note is that the latest parading of Connor Macgregor, staunch anti-immigrant protagonist and Musk’s support for another one, Tommy Robinson.

    Both of these actions seem to be an attempt to push the agenda across the sea, in the United Kingdom.

    Let us now be circumspect, but state it like it is. ‘Anti-immigrant’ really means brown people.

    Is there now any doubt about what these people are about, what their aim is?

    Bear in mind that a number of the Trump backers, Musk, Theil were raised under the apartheid system in South Africa.

    Musk’s father wealth derived from mining in South Africa.

    Everyone has seen the controversy of Musk’s gesture, being ‘salute’ or otherwise.

    But actions must be taken in context of the whole and there I derive my interpretation.

    We have a challenge on our hands globally, that we must stand against, like Martin Luther King did.

    Peacefully, but resolute.

    And let us not be fooled, this applies to anyone not caucasian. Whether black, Indian or Chinese or Persian.


  7. @ Horsemeat
    Boss, You are renerally correct….
    BUT – it is too late now.

    The only time we have left is the time required for the Titanic to become flooded, …and to take the plunge.

    The ONLY thing that makes any sense – is the lifeboat.


  8. “Enemies are necessary, they make us stronger,
    R.I.P. Colonialism”
    Say the Rasta

    “The World will end,
    and then the Bible’s end of world prophecy will be true QED”
    Say the illogical Bible nerds

    We will never eva eva neva eva eva neva neva neva stop praise jah jah
    If a no Jah
    tell me a who
    If a no Jah
    then who make the rain come falling
    If a no Jah
    then who make the sun come shining

  9. Terence Blackett Avatar
    Terence Blackett

    THE FIRST SHALL BE THE LAST & THE LAST SHALL BE THE FIRST: THE CYCLICAL NATURE OF MAN’S FOLLY FOLLOW [3] ASININE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STRANDS OF FUNCTIONAL EXIGENCIES – SLAVERY, WAR & RACE. WILL HUMANS EVER LEARN

    The cyclical recurrence of humanity’s follies – slavery, war, & racial oppression, can be traced to deeply entrenched, flawed epistemologies that perpetuate destructive ideologies. These “asinine strands” of knowledge systems rationalize exploitation, violence, & hierarchy, ensuring their persistence across multi-generational groups…

    The “cyclical nature of man’s folly” suggests that humans keep repeating the same ‘ole mistakes over & over again. The issues of slavery, war, & race keep recurring even in 2025 due to flawed way of thinking, knowing or understanding how the world is evolving. The term “ASININE” means “JACKASSERY”, foolish, “DEMENTED” – so the epistemology here is not just wrong but stupidly so!!!

    Defining epistemology is the study of knowledge & how we know what we know. If the epistemological premise is blatantly asinine, then the foundations of how people come to believe things about slavery, war, & race “RELATIONS” are flawed. This flawed way of knowing leads to these cyclical problems. we are seeing in AmeriKKKa & around Western 1st world countries!!!

    Slavery has existed in various forms throughout history. Even after Abolition, there are “INSIDIOUS” modern forms of human trafficking. This particular cycle might be due to economic factors (AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN), dehumanization, and/or racial prejudices. Epistemologically, people justify slavery through pseudoscientific racism and/or economic theories that devalue specific ethnic groups – oftentimes, “BLACK AFRICANS”!!!

    War is an age-old, recurring issue – as men are “HELLBENT” on “MURDERING EACHOTHER” & despite knowing the horrors war brings, modern nations still engage in “KILLING THE INNOCENT” while they “SPIN YARN” with major holes in it. The epistemological lenience here is fundamentally flawed justifications – like “NATIONALISM” (#AmeriKKKaFirst), demonizing “MADE-UP” enemies, or believing in this Hobbesian inevitability of conflict. Some believe that war is a necessary part of human nature and/or a way to achieve some form of peace, which is whimsically paradoxical…

    “RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT”, yet it’s been used to justify slavery, segregation, & discrimination. This flawed epistemology might include racial hierarchies, stereotypes, & pseudoscience that claims racial superiority. Even today, scientific, systemic racism persists, showing the cycle “CANNOT” be broken!!!

    Even trying to connect these three areas through the lens of faulty knowledge systems remains a daunting task – for some will ask: ‘How do these epistemological penchants perpetuate themselves? Is it through education, media, cultural narratives or what? Is it ingrained – even part of DNA? Each cycle reinforces the same flawed ideas, leading to same repetitious follies!!!

    Resistance & progress are counter-insurgencies that challenge these cycles – for example, the civil rights movement, international laws against slavery, peace studies but despite progress, the cycles continue, suggesting this flawed neuroplasticity is deeply ingrained…

    Historical examples & social philosophers and/or theories have had no answers to the nefarious cycles. Nietzsche’s eternal return, or Hegel’s dialectic, & Thomas Kuhn’s paradigms may have some applied social science relevance but the cycle continues!!!

    Slave owners benefiting from the “CAPITALIST ECONOMY” of slavery with the spinoff promotion of racist ideologies to justify it. War propagated by the military-industrial complex or by nationalistic ideological ideas, where those in power benefit from perpetuating conflict, so they foster a praxis that glorifies war or creates fear of others!!!

    Racial ties into maintaining social hierarchies through scientific racism were used to justify “COLONIZATION & SLAVERY”, & even though debunked, their remnants persist in systemic racism as they adapt & resurface in new forms!!!

    Here’s the structured analysis:

    1. Slavery: The Epistemology of Dehumanization

    Cyclical Justification; Slavery resurfaces through economic greed & pseudoscientific racism. Ancient empires, transatlantic chattel slavery, & modern human trafficking all rely on dehumanizing narratives

    Flawed Epistemology:

    Racial hierarchies & economic theories (e.g., “natural” inferiority, utilitarianism) falsely justify treating people as property. These ideas persist in systemic inequalities, migrant labor exploitation, & carceral systems

    Example:

    19th-century “scientific racism” claimed Black people were biologically inferior, legitimizing slavery. Today, caste systems & xenophobic rhetoric echo similar logic

    2. War – The Epistemology of Inevitability

    Cyclical Justification:

    War is often framed as an inevitable expression of human nature or a necessary tool for peace. Nationalist myths, demonization of “the other,” and militarism reinforce this belief

    Flawed Epistemology:

    The “Security Dilemma” & Social Darwinism portray conflict as natural. Political rhetoric (e.g., “us vs. them”) & profit-driven militarism (e.g., the military-industrial complex) sustain this cycle

    Example:

    Post-9/11 “War on Terror” relied on Orientalist stereotypes, justifying endless conflict. Similarly, Putin’s invasion of Ukraine invokes historical myths of Slavic unity

    3. Race as the Epistemology of Hierarchy

    Cyclical Justification; Race as a social construct, is weaponized to maintain power. Colonialism, eugenics, & segregationist policies all stem from epistemic frameworks that naturalize inequality

    Flawed Epistemology:

    Pseudoscience (e.g., phrenology) & cultural narratives (e.g., “Model Minorities”) perpetuate stereotypes. Systemic racism in housing, education, & policing reflects these enduring beliefs

    Example:

    Jim Crow laws & South African Apartheid were rooted in racial epistemologies; today, algorithmic bias & voter suppression continue their legacy

    Breaking the Cycle

    Teaching histories of resistance (e.g., abolitionism, civil rights) & centering marginalized voices (e.g., Indigenous knowledge) can dismantle harmful narratives

    Structural Change:

    Legal reforms (e.g., anti-discrimination laws) & economic redistribution challenge the material bases of these cycles

    Ethical Reckoning:

    Embracing moral solidarity – such as “UBUNTU” (“I am because we are”) or feminist ethics of care – prioritizes collective humanity over exploitation

    The cyclicality of slavery, war, & racism is not inevitable but a product of epistemic systems designed to serve power elites. Dismantling these cycles requires replacing the asinine hubris with frameworks grounded in justice, empathy, & critical consciousness.

    Only then can humanity transcend its self-destructive patterns but whether this is even a possibility – history does not posit a positive narrative, at all!!!


  10. If you think Trump and Rubio will have any difficulty spotting the Chinese connection in the Arican Export Import Bank, think again.

    https://www.afreximbank.com/the-african-export-import-bank-afreximbank-and-the-export-import-bank-of-china-cexim-sign-us600-million-loan-to-fund-loans-and-trade-finance-transactions/


  11. US to revoke temporary status for 532,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans

    written by Barbados Today 22/03/2025

    The Department of Homeland Security plans to revoke legal protections for hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, setting them up for potential deportation in about a month.

    The order applies to about 532,000 people from the four countries who came to the United States since October 2022. They arrived with financial sponsors and were given two-year permits to live and work in the U.S.

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said they will lose their legal status on April 24, or 30 days after the publication of the notice in the Federal Register.

    The new policy impacts people who are already in the U.S. and who came under the humanitarian parole program.

    It follows an earlier Trump administration decision to end what it called the “broad abuse” of the humanitarian parole, a long-standing legal tool presidents have used to allow people from countries where there’s war or political instability to enter and temporarily live in the U.S.

    During his campaign, President Donald Trump promised to deport millions of people who are in the U.S. illegally, and as president he has been also ending legal pathways for immigrants to come to the U.S. and to stay.

    You Might Be Interested In
    Tropical storm Hilary slams Southwest U.S. with heavy rain
    Immigrant advocates welcome NY Governor’s call for work authorisations, support and shelter for Caribbean asylum seekers
    White shooter kills 3 Black people in Florida hate crime as Washington celebrates King’s dream
    DHS said parolees without a lawful basis to stay in the U.S. “must depart” before their parole termination date.

    “Parole is inherently temporary, and parole alone is not an underlying basis for obtaining any immigration status,” DHS said.

    Before the new order, the beneficiaries of the program could stay in the U.S. until their parole expires, although the administration had stopped processing their applications for asylum, visas and other requests that might allow them to remain longer.

    The administration decision has already been challenged in federal courts.

    A group of American citizens and immigrants sued the Trump administration for ending humanitarian parole and are seeking to reinstate the programs for the four nationalities.

    Lawyers and activists raised their voices to denounce the government’s decision.

    Friday’s action is “going to cause needless chaos and heartbreak for families and communities across the country,” said Karen Tumlin, founder and director of Justice Action Center, one of the organizations that filed the lawsuit at the end of February. She called it “reckless, cruel and counterproductive.”

    SOURCE: AP

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading