← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Houses tend to become dilapidated when the owners stop maintaining the properties or die. To prevent dilapidated abandoned houses from becoming unsanitary nuisances, the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) first warns homeowners, and if there is no improvement, takes the drastic step of demolishing the house.

Prior to November 2019, the EPD mainly demolished derelict timber-walled houses. After November 2019, approximately 88% of all derelict houses demolished by the EPD were stone masonry-walled houses.

DEMOLISHING STRUCTURALLY STABLE HOUSES.

While derelict timber-walled houses may be rotten to the point where it is more economical to rebuild than repair, derelict stone masonry-walled houses may be economically repaired. The new Retrofit Manual (2023) for houses in Barbados includes a section on strengthening stone masonry houses.

After inspecting a house with a demolition notice and finding the walls structurally stable, I wrote the EPD requesting a stay on the demolition of stone masonry houses until the repair costs may be determined. The EPD noted that only the affected property owners could apply for such stays and they did not have a mandate to repair. I have since inspected several derelict stone masonry houses that were economically repairable.

I support the demolition of derelict timber-walled houses and the clean-up of unsanitary debris within and around all derelict houses. However, the recent urgency to demolish structurally stable stone-masonry houses that may be easily repaired is concerning. Perhaps the following solution may be considered.

A SOLUTION.

Rather than demolish structurally stable stone-masonry houses, perhaps we can spend the demolition money paying unemployed persons to learn to rehabilitate the houses. The property owners may provide the building materials.

If a property owner is unwilling or unable to provide the building materials, then the Government may provide the homeowner with the following options. Either the house will be demolished, or the Government will provide the materials, and then rent out the rehabilitated house for as long as necessary to recover the rehabilitation costs.

This solution should benefit: the homeowner, the Government, unemployed persons and the national economy. It should especially help at-risk youth, including those who left secondary school with no academic qualifications and those recently released from prison with no job prospects. The Government may include this initiative in its Construction Gateway Training.

RESTORING A LOST ART.

We have generally lost the art of stone masonry construction in Barbados, which was common in the colonial era. When these buildings are demolished, they are no longer part of our built heritage. Since November 2019, the EPD published scheduled demolition notices for 915 stone masonry houses. At the EPD’s current demolition rate, stone masonry houses will soon be a rare sight in Barbados.

The available options appear to be to either stop demolishing structurally stable stone-masonry derelict houses and repair them to benefit everyone, or continue with the stated aim of removing all vestiges of colonialism from Barbados’ landscape – to please a few.

Grenville Phillips II is a Doctor of Engineering, a Chartered Structural Engineer. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

72 responses to “Removing Vestiges”


  1. @Bush tea

    The irony is that on the commodity side of the equation many products attract protectionist measures by government. Hard to understand the illogic.


  2. How is a Welcome Stamp Program left to open market forces – where strangers can be allowed to compete directly with ordinary brass bowls for VERY LIMITED, but vital resources? – like housing, food, water, transport?

    Correct! But this is nothing new.
    This is just a continuation of the practice where the average Barbadian is force to compete with the very rich from all over the world. It is almost amusing to hear Bajans talk of the foreign super star/’sportsmen’ who own property there. It would appear hat they do not not realize that one rich person pushes up the price for a dozen of poor Bajans.


  3. @Bush Tea January 18, 2025 at 8:24 pm “PERHAPS Bushie could have pulled a few strings in your favor…??!!”

    1 John 2:1 And if anyone sins, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.

    So why would I need to ask a huMAN a favour when Jesus Christ is my best friend and I talk to him every day?

  4. Peter L. Thompson Avatar
    Peter L. Thompson

    @Grenville
    This is an excellent article. Thank you. Please expand it to 800 words and get it published in the Nation.

  5. Peter L. Thompson Avatar
    Peter L. Thompson

    @ Bush Tea
    I apologize to the Bajan people for the part I have played in the real estate catastrophe in Barbados. In my defense I will point out that when I proposed the remote work visa that was followed by the Welcome Stamp program, I stipulated that the minimum annual income to qualify should be US$150,000. This I thought would make them compete for accommodation with the Sandy Lane crowd rather than middle class Bajans.


  6. @ PLT
    “….when I proposed the remote work visa that was followed by the Welcome Stamp program, I stipulated that the minimum annual income to qualify should be US$150,000. ..”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    What you SHOULD have stipulated was that the whole process be planned and executed by intelligent, competent and honest administrators. (but that would have ended any chance of the scheme in Brassbados LOL)

    It was actually an innovative and forward thinking concept. It should have been patented and administered exactly like AirBNB and Uber. But whenever you bring rich, albino-centrics in contact with bribe-seeking BBs, you can rest assured that underhand money will pass, and the rules will quickly favor the wealthy – to the detriment of the poor.
    …but a lotta BMWs anf Range Rovers do circulate in certain circles…

    @ Cuhdear
    ‘pulling strings in your favor’ has NOTHING to do with you asking Bushie (or Jesus) for favors… You very ’touchious’… !
    It would have been an independent GOODWILL gesture on Bushie’s part. It has been known to happen. 🙂
    …But your endorsing the conkies, and putting them back in the pot… is an unpardonable sin for Bushie..
    Next time you talk to Jesus ask him about his favorite little brother, Bush Tea….LOL
    You will get an earful…


  7. @PLT:

    They told me that they would not publish anything from me above 600 words. I sent them max 600 word articles and they still were not published.


  8. Send a nice reminder.
    Ask why it has not been published.


  9. What send what reminder what!!
    The Nation is highly overrated, and the editors are mere jokers who are caught between kowtowing to the political jokers bout here, …and their Trinidadian bosses.
    Their reader feedback is infantile… and politically filtered.

    Did you see how that Heather Cole article DEMOLISHED the shiite CRC report.. after the mediocre coverage by the shiite Nation…?
    Steupsss..

    BU is actually a better option – even the Nation joker reporters get their news and views from BU.


  10. @Bush Tea

    You are correct, BU is does not have their circulation numbers but it is where they come to feed.


  11. St. James

  12. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @SS
    Dwight got this. Albeit he wants primarily to build on land AFTER demolition, it would appear since they are “working through” the sticky issue of land owners, the two, new builds and renovations, could be merged? (an SPV=Special Purpose Vehicle, meaning a special company to help teefing. Recently he called it a state run enterprise with a GRANT (free money to teef)
    [Dec 2022 BT]Government is working on a plan to use the 25 000-plus derelict properties and empty lots across the island to build more housing for Barbadians. Minister of Housing, Lands and Maintenance Dwight Sutherland, who made the disclosure on Wednesday, said research had confirmed that there are more than 15 000 derelict properties and 10 000 vacant lots in Barbados. And he said demolition of derelict buildings has already begun.“It is Government’s [plan] to place houses on most of these available lands as a result of the removal of derelict properties…,”

    “We will work properly through an SPV with land owners; we are not just taking up people’s land. We remove derelict buildings and then what you have there is land, you don’t have a home. So, we have to work with them to make sure that [with] those 15 000 derelict and 10 000 vacant lots we provide homes for those persons who are badly in need of homes in this country,” the Housing Minister said.

    [Dec 2024 BT] Sutherland first announced the derelict buildings and vacant lot transformation project in August 2023 (methinks Dec 2022). Back then, he said there were well over 25 000 derelict and vacant lots island-wide and a new state-run enterprise would be established to transform the derelict properties into housing solutions. The minister also said then that this project would include public derelict properties as well as private ones, adding that a $700 000 grant from the Inter-American Development Bank would be utilised to kick-start the programme.


  13. How many can recall Dwight was an employee of Mark Maloney? Barbadians going about their business with eyes wide shut.


  14. @NorthernObserver January 21, 2025 at 2:42 am “@SS Dwight got this. Albeit he wants primarily to build on land AFTER demolition, it would appear since they are “working through” the sticky issue of land owners, the two, new builds and renovations, could be merged? (an SPV=Special Purpose Vehicle, meaning a special company to help teefing. Recently he called it a state run enterprise with a GRANT (free money to teef)”

    I hope that the “sticky issue of land owners” does not mean dispossessing land owners who are land rich but cash poor.

    Special Purpose Vehicle??? I hear that some of our private sector are billionaires with nuff, nuff money stashed in foreign jurisdictions. I would prefer that the private sector since they are so “smart and competent” use their own money to develop and profitably manage projects like this instead of using tax money from pensioners like me.

    But I don’t honestly have that much faith in the creativity and competence of our private sector.

  15. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @SS
    “we are not just taking up people’s land”
    That is the closest I can find to your concern.
    When Eminent Domain arose re Mrs Rams land, @enuff told me my definition of “public use” was too narrow, too literal.
    Earlier reports from the EPD, “suggested” whomever they were sending “registered mail to” as the owner, didn’t frequently reply. While the Central Bank has an extensive procedure for Commercial Banks to follow, prior to declaring an Account as Abandoned, I cannot find similar for Property. EPD is declaring the Structure itself abandoned, not the property = land + buildings (a.k.a Improvements)
    When the USA had issues in ’07, thousands of homes owing monies in taxes, services and mortgages, were stripped of some of those encumbrances, packaged and sold.
    Somebody asked what “economically repaired” meant?
    So the private sector, or government, are funding structural and other repairs to make the property ‘habitable’, and then somehow acquiring the rights to rent said property, until, all the expenses (these will be fun) to make the property habitable and maintained throughout the rental period are recovered. Then? And we could be 15 years on. The original owner get the improved property back? They abandon a property, with encumbrances (unpaid taxes and bills) and with no personal investment, receive after XX years, a property with a maintained structure. Shite, even the Cubans can’t achieve this.
    In the last Annual Report provided by the EPA ’20-21, we learn the PMO has requested a full list of all structures from 08-20, declared derelict, and the costs associated with demolition and the monies recovered. You know it’s a shit show, and hence the request.
    No further Reports so the findings are a secret.


  16. I think that back in the late 50’s early 60’s my family may have lost some land to public use, that is widening the road to the north and east sides. When the estate was being administered in the early 21st century there were 2 different plots. When one was compared to another it is clear how much land was lost/given to the government of Barbados. So the lawyer asked if our parents received any money for the land taken. We could find no documentation, and none of us could recall any talk of extra money coming into the household. This was a household in which 6 children were born in 9 years and 9 months, so a struggling rural working class household. We came to believe that our parents very generous as they were never asked for nor received any money, and likely were never offered any either, but were happy to see the improvements which did not benefit them, but benefited some neighbors further on who got better access to their homes.

  17. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Your stories are always very nice. But
    I know you don’t like the pols wasting taxpayers money. And your opinion of the private sector you have made clear.
    GP11 says 180 stone masonry houses per year. That’s actually an astounding number.
    My question…how is the situation rectified? What are the rules?


  18. NorthernObserver January 21, 2025 at 7:52 pm “My question…how is the situation rectified? What are the rules?”

    For a small fee I could write some rules which treats the land owner, the state, the investor, the tenant or buyer fairly, but not being politically connected it is unlikely that I will be asked.

    My question: Do all these parties value fairness?

  19. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    Fee? You are one of those private sector suckers?
    They value expediency over fairness, which is relative.
    To besides the ONLY group you need to protect are property owners whom the EPD cannot reach.
    Since the EPD has a functioning website, I cannot complain. They cover a vast range of duties. Yet, one might think since they are required to publish a list of derelict buildings, their website may have such information. GP11 seems to know current information not on their website.
    Finding solutions to the derelict issue would seem to be a far easier way to release pent up liquidity, than Bonds or TBills.


  20. @NorthernObserver January 22, 2025 at 1:41 pm “Fee? You are one of those private sector suckers?”

    No please.


  21. mash up and build back…..maybe.


  22. Did the BFS not welcome the demolition of the Fire Station in the City too…?
    Which public official has the balls to speak truth to power bout here?

    Covid 19 was a classic.
    What a place…

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading