← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

The following story is of interest to Barbadians. It seems strangely ironic a ‘nasty’ story about a Barbados born priest is in the news at the peak of a Christian holiday. What is also interesting is that before David Tudor was kicked out of the Anglican Church for life in the UK, he was on suspension for 5 years and during that time Nation News has reported he was invited to participate in a local ceremony.

Tudor was part of Springer Memorial School’s 60th anniversary gala, held in October at the University of the West Indies Cave Hill under the big tent, he being the son of its first principal the late Pamela Tudor, and the late Canon Harold Tudor – Source: Nation News

What the hell!

It is no secret the Church prefers to hide its dirty laundry in private. It is one of the great hypocrisies of the times given its primary mandate to save souls. It is possible David Tudor will be seen in a pulpit near you soon to explain his indiscretions. Wasn’t his father Harold Tudor also in the gossip news because of his lifestyle preference?


Bishop reacts as vicar banned over grooming claims

1 November 2024ShareSave

Stuart Woodward

BBC David Tudor, a vicar on Canvey Island, pictured taking part in a BBC documentary in 2018. He appears in a black suit with a white dog collar, with greying hair.
David Tudor – pictured in a 2018 BBC documentary – has been banned for life by the Church of England

The Bishop of Chelmsford has said lessons “must be learned” after a vicar was struck off over sexual abuse allegations.

David Tudor, who was team rector for the Parish of Canvey in Essex, had been suspended for the last five years but was banned for life by the Church of England at a tribunal hearing this week.

The panel heard he formed sexual relationships with two girls – including one under the age of 16 – between 1982 and 1989.

The Right Reverend Dr Guli Francis-Deqhani welcomed the decision to “prohibit him from ministry for life”.

“I am deeply sorry for the profound hurt and harm David Tudor’s behaviour has caused,” said Dr Francis-Deqhani.

“There will be important lessons that must be learned about how this matter has been handled over many years and I welcome the fact that there will now be a national independent safeguarding practice review.”

Diaries destroyed

The tribunal determined that Mr Tudor’s behaviour – which occurred when he was a priest in the Diocese of Southwark – was “an abuse of trust” which amounted to “grooming”.

Mr Tudor told the two-day tribunal that he had no recollection of the incidents with the two girls – who were identified as X and Y – but he accepted that sexual acts took place between himself and Y, and did not challenge X’s account of what happened.

The tribunal heard how the former vicar tried to keep the relationship with X – which started when she was 15 years old – a secret, demanding she destroyed her diaries.

He offered a full apology to both X and Y.

Diocese of Chelmsford The Bishop of Chelmsford, the Right Reverend Dr Guli Francis-Deqhani, with greying hair, a grey cardigan, a purple shirt and white dog collar. She is wearing glasses and is looking at the camera lens
The Bishop of Chelmsford said she was “deeply sorry for the profound hurt and harm David Tudor’s behaviour” caused

Surrey Police said it investigated a report in 2019 of “non-recent indecent assault offences” against a man in his 60s from Canvey Island – which were alleged to have taken place in Reigate – but the Crown Prosecution Service determined there was insufficient evidence to take the matter to court.

“As with all closed cases, if any new or compelling evidence is reported to us, we will look at the possibility of reopening the investigation,” a spokesperson for the force added.

Mr Tudor was also accused but acquitted of indecent assault against a 16-year-old girl – identified as Z – in January 1988, the tribunal heard.

He was sentenced to six months in prison in 1988 for indecent assault in relation to three other complainants, but this conviction was later quashed by the Court of Appeal.

After serving a five-year suspension, he returned to ministry in the 1990s and was appointed team vicar of Canvey Island in 1997 and team rector in 2000.

Mr Tudor was later suspended in 2005 by the Diocese of Chelmsford after a complaint was made about his conduct relating to a time prior to his ordination in the 1970s, which did not involve either X or Y.

The tribunal heard there were no criminal proceedings and he was permitted to return to his position at Canvey Island.

The Rt Reverend Christopher Chessun, Bishop of Southwark, said that Mr Tudor’s behaviour was “a serious and damaging breach of his pastoral and professional obligations as a priest”.

Mr Tudor’s victims were being offered full support, Reverend Chessun added, saying he was “deeply grateful” for their courage in sharing their experiences and engaging “with this long and difficult process”.

Source: BBC


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

160 responses to “Barbadian Priest David Tudor barred”


  1. I believe “Johnny” Tudor would have been a second cousin to David Tudor.

    https://barbados.loopnews.com/content/pm-mottley-remembers-joseph-johnny-tudor-his-way-words


  2. Cuhdear Bajan
    December 24, 2024 at 10:49 pm
    Rate This

    David Tudor’s father the Anglican Canon, used to come to my school to invigilate General Certificate of Education (GCE) examinations.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You were a Springer girl?


  3. The High Society people of Little Barbados are Low Society people elsewhere.
    People of underdeveloped countries have underdeveloped minds.
    Pay no attention to petty gossip.


  4. Hope you all enjoy the Independence Sermon preached by David Thompson in 2013.


  5. @John December 25, 2024 at 5:17 am “You were a Springer girl?”

    No.

    Then and now exam invigilators work at various schools.


  6. @John December 24, 2024 at 9:27 pm “I suspect the reason why David Tudor is causing some to get their knickers in a twist is because he is too clear. If he was darker with features and hair to suit, no one would be saying anything. No doubt Muhdear and Donna are also so afflicted by the light colour of his skin, his good hair and fine features and can’t process the facts.”

    I won’t speak for Donna because I know that Donna is more than capable of speaking for herself.

    The thoughts I have expressed about Tudor have nothing to do with “the light color of his skin, his good hair and fine feature” because I care nothing about such things. If Tudor was a black woman, or if he becomes a black woman my thoughts would be exactly the same.

    So be off do.


  7. What an asshole John Knox is!

    I have successfully brought up my son to leave little girls alone. THAT alone should tell you what my position is on statutory rape, regardless of skin colour and hair texture.

    P.S. In this climate, nappy hair is the good hair. The limp, oily stuff is good in cold climates. My brain is not washed in white shite like yours.


  8. There is a school of thought that says criminals should be reported, caught and prosecuted in the first instance they perpetrate a crime for their own good..

    .. as they will always keep committing more crimes which gets worse and end up as hardcore serious serial criminals

    Apologist John Knox is part of this cover up problem that looks the other way condoning and minimising wrong actions while gaslighting others for fun

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading