Solutions Barbados
Submitted by Dr. Grenville Phillips II

Sixty years before our Independence in 1966, there were several black-owned businesses established in Barbados, many of which operated in Roebuck Street in Bridgetown [1]. However, once the owners died, the businesses normally closed shortly thereafter. This difficult conversation describes this black man’s curse.

Black-owned business owners tended to use their profits to educate their children. But their educated children did not then work in their parents’ business to make it more profitable. Instead, they worked to improve the profits of other companies – thus denying benefits to the business that supported them by diverting their talents elsewhere.

GENERATIONAL WEALTH.

Generational wealth may be sustained by: (i) parents starting and growing a business, (ii) their children working in the business and eventually managing it, and (iii) their grandchildren working in the business and eventually managing it.

The type of business the parents start is not important. What is important is that every generation understands the plan. Parents who have been employed for 10 years should have developed the discipline to start a side-business that their children can work in. Parents who offer professional services should encourage their children to pursue the profession of at least one parent.

NO REGRETS.

It should be clarified that there is no right or wrong career path. Our children are free to choose their own path of study and work for any business they choose – or they may start their own business. The point is that this path may not sustain generational wealth.

I have no regrets of choosing the way of Engineering. However, I sometimes wonder what would have happened had my father encouraged me to pursue a career in financial services before I attended university. It is likely that someone else would be doing the work that I now do, and I would have joined him in his business.

THE FAMILY BUSINESS.

There are many benefits of children following the career choices of their parents. A parent may spend over a decade building a good reputation with many satisfied clients. Children who work in the family business get to stand on the ‘shoulders’ of their parents who have already done most of the ‘heavy lifting’. These children then get to grow the family business.

Other ethnic groups seem to have no problem working in their family’s businesses. But the black man seems to prefer starting on his own, at the bottom, with no clients, far behind their peers in other ethnic groups who joined their family businesses.

Our black students frequently complain that employers want employees with work experience. Had their parents started a family business, they could have gotten this experience.

BREAKING THE CURSE.

How do we as a people break this curse? I have no idea. I did not follow my father’s career and my son did not follow mine – despite my best efforts. However, I will give some thoughts for consideration.

The parent’s career may not appeal to the child. The child may be musically inclined and have no interest in studying say, accounting. However, the child should understand that pursuing accounting is to pay the bills and fund the development of any talent the child may wish to pursue. When the hobby can also pay the bills, then they may switch careers.

I believe that every black child can: (i) graduate from school, (ii) start at the bottom and enjoy a very successful career in any field, and (iii) build a house, raise a family and educate their children. That is a blessing not a curse. The curse is that the black man is content to do only that so that when he dies, his business normally dies with him.

Grenville Phillips II is a Doctor of Engineering and a Chartered Structural Engineer. He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com
[1] Carter, H. (2016). Resisting Hegemony: Black Entrepreneurship in Colonial Barbados, 1900-1966. Business and Economic History, Vol.14.

57 responses to “The Black Man’s Curse”


  1. @ David, I read Kman 6ixx was also supposed to perform in Grenada during the island’s 50th idependence anniversary, but was not granted permission because GND police said there were concerns about the ongoing gang warfare in T&T, given recent attempts on the artiste’s life, a possibility exist that the violence may ‘spill over’ in the island.


  2. Exactly. Some on this blog can be expected to squeeze every issue into a narrow perspective. Caricom border expectorate is expected to ignore red flags because the person is black.


  3. @ David,
    Hollywood has always glorified violence from the days of the “heroic” cowboys and the “rebellious” indians; as well as glamourising Al Capone and his contemporaries.

    Culturally, is there any difference between this young man glorifying violence with his music and Hollywood’s portrayal of violence?

    Hollywood is a notch up from the violence portrayed in Tom and Gerry cartoons.

    Sadly no good will come from this music. It always surprises me that it is loved and appreciated by the many and I am not just referring to the gullible.


  4. @TLSN

    No comment.


  5. The “Black Man’s Curse,” means that escaping racial profiling is impossible for black men (or black people).

    I’m in a New York state of mind
    Hip Hop music never killed anybody ever ever ever

    Strumming my pain with his fingers
    Singing my life with his words
    Killing me softly with his song
    Killing me softly with his song
    Telling my whole life with his words
    Killing me softly with his song

    This is Wyclef, Refugee Camp (L-Boogie up in here)
    Praswell (Praswell up in here, haha)
    Lil’ Base sittin’ up here on the bass (Refugees up in here)
    While I’m on this, I got my girl L (ah, ah)
    One time (one time), one time (one time)
    Ayo, L, you know you got the lyrics

    I heard he sang a good song, I heard he had a style
    And so I came to see him, and listen for a while
    And there he was, this young boy, stranger to my eyes
    Strumming my pain with his fingers (one time, one time)
    Singing my life with his words (two times, two times)
    Killing me softly with his song
    Killing me softly with his song
    Telling my whole life with his words
    Killing me softly with his song


  6. Dr. Phillips stated” once the owners died, the business normally died shortly thereafter.”
    Dr. Phillips please tell us which of the following businesses ceased and which were black owned:

    Fort Royal Garage,
    Motor Services Ltd,
    M.G. Tucker ltd,
    Eckstein Brothers,
    A. E. Taylor,
    Plantations Ltd,
    The Foundary ,
    Modern Living,
    R. S. Nicholls,
    General Traders Ltd,
    Alleyne Arthur Ltd,
    Matin Doorly Ltd,
    K. R. Hunte Ltd,
    Y. De Ltd,
    Knights Ltd,
    Roberts Ltd,
    Ramdin & Co.,
    Dowding Estates Ltd.,
    Challenor Ltd
    Roberts Ltd of High Street
    Daily News newspaper
    T HERBERT Ltd -lumber yard


  7. @Mike

    You listed Daily Newspaper in your comment. Here is a press report which paints a picture of the demise of the grand old lady on Fontabell owned by a Black man you will recall.

    RETURN MONEY

    Ex-Advocate director ordered to account for $1.6m

    By Maria Bradshaw mariabradshaw@nationnews.com

    The woman who withdrew $4.8 million from a joint account the day after the owner of The Barbados Advocate newspaper, Sir Anthony Bryan, died was ordered by a High Court judge last year to account to the deceased’s estate for the monies which she still holds.

    Furthermore, Justice Cecil McCarthy also determined that Gail Sherry-Ann Padmore was not a “spouse” of media owner Sir Anthony who died on June 7, 2020, leaving a will and wealth totalling millions of dollars, which are the subjects of numerous lawsuits.

    That decision which was delivered in the civil case brought by Allan Bryan and Alexander Bryan, (claimants), son and grandson of Sir Anthony against Padmore, (defendant), was the first decision to be rendered so far in more than six lawsuits brought by relatives, board members and even former staff.

    Padmore, a former employee of BBS, a director of The Advocate and one of the executor’s named in Sir Anthony’s will, was one of the joint account holders along with the son and grandson.

    She argued that she had been Sir Anthony’s spouse since 2012 and an authorised signatory pursuant to the Personal Financial Services Agreement. She withdrew the money and placed it on her personal account at the same bank.

    Sir Anthony’s son and grandson, however, brought the lawsuit against her, claiming two-thirds of the money which was withdrawn.

    On January 20, 2022, one of Padmore’s counsels paid the sum of $3 224 221.56 into the court registry. The court noted in the judgment that it was never notified about this payment until 11 months later. Padmore now has to account for $1 612 111.

    It was further revealed in court that Sir Anthony opened the account in 2010, added Padmore’s name in 2016 and his son and grandson’s in 2019. The claimants submitted that Sir Anthony wished the funds to be available for his family to meet expenses and any other requirements of everyday life and that Padmore was placed on the bank account in her capacity as the caregiver of the deceased.

    Padmore, however, claimed she was “the spouse” of the deceased within the meaning of the Succession Act, and that she was cohabiting with him from 2012 until he died.

    She submitted to the court that not only was she the deceased’s caretaker but she was also “intimately involved” in partial management of Sir Anthony’s business affairs, as she disputed the claimants’ submission that her name was only placed on the account as “caretaker”.

    She also alleged that from time to time, she added money to the bank account and that she and Sir Anthony would pool funds.

    She further told the court that the claimants were only added to the bank account “for expediency and convenience”.

    Justice McCarthy, in his ruling, however, found there was no evidence provided that Padmore ever deposited monies to the account or that she ever used monies from the account when Sir Anthony was alive.

    The court also determined that she was “not a spouse”.

    The judge stated: “Having carefully considered this matter, after weighing the evidence, I am of the view that even if there was a joint account created in 2016 between Sir Anthony and the defendant, this would have been superseded by the joint banking account created on March 28, 2019. Moreover, I have concluded that there is no credible evidence to demonstrate that Sir Anthony intended to gift the monies in the joint account to the defendant.

    ‘Lack of effort’

    “Additionally, I have concluded that the defendant has not established, on a balance of probabilities, that she is the spouse of the deceased. Her affidavit in this regard had been opposed by the evidence of the claimants in this case. No significant effort has been made by the defendant to prove her case in this regard.”

    The judge also agreed with Padmore’s attorney that the “claimants have not established that they are entitled to the monies on the joint banking account,” as he added: “I also do not accept that the defendant has rebutted the presumption of resulting trust in favour of the estate of the deceased.”

    The judge proceeded to dismiss the claimants’ claim to a share in the proceeds of the joint banking account.

    He further ordered that the sum of $3 224 221.56 currently held with the Registrar of the Supreme Court be paid over to the personal representative(s) of the estate of the deceased once they obtain a grant from the Supreme Court and also that the defendant and the claimants account to the personal representative(s) of the estate of the deceased for the remaining sums withdrawn from the joint account, after the death of the deceased.

    Padmore has since brought a civil suit against Advocate Publishers Inc., claiming monies owed. That case was supposed to be heard on February 29 [last Thursday] and a notice was posted on the front door of The Advocate’s Fontabelle, St Michael office, indicating such.

    Informed sources told the Sunday Sun the future of the 129-year-old Barbados Advocate newspaper appears to be in limbo with the operations coming to a halt. Sir Anthony became the first black owner of the newspaper when he bought it in 2000.

    The source said The Advocate newspaper was now barely limping along, having not published a newspaper since September last year. “The board is deadlocked and cannot meet to decide on anything. Also the newspaper’s top management; assistant managing director and the human resources manager resigned recently,” the source added.

    Meanwhile, six staff members who have not been paid for the last ten months are still dutifully going to work on a daily basis.

    “No trespassing” and “private property” signs have also been placed around the Fontabelle, St Michael property which resembles a ghost town.

    Source: Nation

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading