← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

Submitted by Inkwell

The Government of Barbados is the cause of, is responsible for and should be accountable to the people for the runaway indiscipline being exhibited by operators in the Public Service Vehicle Sector. It has caused and is responsible for the escalation of that indiscipline over a period of more than twenty years.

Every time a PSV stops at a place other than a bus stop to pick up or put off a passenger, the Government is to blame.

Every time an operator overloads his PSV, the Government is responsible.

Every time a PSV goes off route, the Government is to blame.

Every time a PSV overtakes other vehicles dangerously, it is the Government’s fault.

Every time a PSV driver curses you for objecting to his “bad” driving, the Government is to blame.

Every time a PSV driver drives like a madman to get where he is going as quickly as possible, the Government is responsible.

Every time a PSV conductor illegally stops traffic on a main road to let out his driver from a side street, it is the Government’s fault.

Every time a PSV driver or conductor appears in court for the umpteenth time on a traffic violation charge, the Government is to blame.

Every time a PSV driver stops suddenly in front of you, without indicating, to pick up a passenger, it is the Government’s fault.

And the Government chooses to do nothing about it!!

You see, the Government has for the last twenty years been forcing private owners of PSV’s to subsidize public transportation out of their own pockets. It has long been a Government policy to keep bus fares low so that they would not be burdensome on the people who use public transportation most, the lower socio-economic classes. And that is laudable, don’t get me wrong. It may be laudable, but in these economic times it is unrealistic, since this subsidy has to be financed by you and me, the taxpayers and contributes significantly to the country’s fiscal deficit, currently the cause of much concern. Records for the last twenty years are not readily available, but reports state that the Government subsidized the Transport Board a whopping $142 million over the three year period to 2009. That is nearly $4 million a month, folks and God knows how much free travel for school children has added to that. The PSV sector, which transports approximately 60% of public transport users, receives no subsidy from the Government, but gets in its place unfair competition, outrageous tax impositions and unfair police treatment.

The Government has restricted the income of PSV’s to $1.50 per passenger since 1991, 19 YEARS, YES 19 YEARS. It is a miracle and a testament to the resourcefulness of PSV owners that many have been able to keep their vehicles on the road. How can a Government in all conscience use the law to disadvantage a section of the governed which contributes significantly to the economy of Barbados?

Government knows that a fare of $1.50 comes nowhere near to covering the cost of providing a transport service, but has kept that fare in place since 1991, without acknowledging the damage that it was and is doing to the private owners, who are not fortunate to have a taxpayer provided subsidy.

Each of you knows painfully how the cost of maintaining a motor vehicle has risen over the last twenty years. A PSV must work on average fifteen hours a day, six or seven days a week and the need for maintenance is therefore much greater than the average vehicle. PSV owners cannot continue paying higher and higher operating costs while being restricted to income based on $1.50 per passenger. I won’t even get into the ridiculous fact that the same fare applies whether a journey is Bridgetown to Hastings or Bridgetown to Sam Lords. (Why don’t they do that to taxi owners?)

Ask yourself which business could survive today’s operating costs on income legally restricted to 1991 levels. The Government provides free (subsidized) education. Does it restrict what private educational institutions charge?

The Government provides free (subsidized) medical and dental services at the QEH and polyclinics. Does it restrict what private medical and dental practitioners charge?

No, but it restricts the income of the PSV sector for 19 years and expects it to remain viable.

Meanwhile, Government is subsidizing the Transport Board $4 million per month (and rising?) and running up the fiscal deficit.

And to make matters even worse, the Government removed the one subsidy that PSV owners enjoyed…that on diesel. Yes, the Government saw fit to further burden PSV owners by increasing the price of diesel in 2008 from $1.46 per liter to $2.77, an increase of 77%. A minibus uses on average 100 liters of diesel a day. Expense on fuel therefore leapt frighteningly from $146.00 a day to $277.00 a day and had to be paid for out of the same numbers of passengers paying $1.50. No wonder PSV’s have to fight for every $1.50 they can get to survive, and if they have to take a cussing from you to do it, so be it. They have finite space. They cannot extend the length of the vehicle to accommodate more passengers. The diesel price came down as low as $1.27 for the period between January and May last year, but has climbed steadily since to $1.73, where it stands at present and forecasts are that the price of oil has nowhere to go but up.

Meantime Government is subsidizing the Transport Board $4 million per month.

But it is not only the PSV owners that the Government in disadvantaging. There are over 1000 drivers and conductors working in this sector and they have not been able to get a wages increase for NINETEEN YEARS. No matter how you compute it, $1.50 can only stretch so far and a minibus can still legally carry only 34 passengers. How would you feel if you hadn’t had a salary increase for nineteen years? And you knew that the Government was responsible. Wouldn’t you be tempted to rebel at some level? Would you not at every opportunity carry as many passengers as your vehicle could hold and to hell with the law? Especially when Transport Board buses are allowed by the same law enforcers to carry as many as they want without harassment? And might not your attitude after so many years become “well if dem ain’t care nutton bout we, we en care nuttun bout dem neida.”

PSV operators are struggling to survive. They have families to feed and they right now have to work on average a fifteen hour day for earnings which often fall below minimum wage. And many of them subsidize their incomes by dipping into the fare bag, further hurting the owner.

Who is responsible for this situation, the owners? the workers?

I am stating categorically that the bad behavior by workers in this sector is a direct result of unfair treatment by the Government

THE GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE!

It will be difficult to reverse the “minibus culture” which unfortunately has been allowed to become ingrained over many years, but any attempt MUST be based on an increase in bus fares so that owners and workers can earn an income which bears some semblance to the ever escalating cost of living or if that is not desirable, provide a subsidy to the private owners as it does the Transport Board and reduce road taxes and provide duty concessions on parts and replacement vehicles.

Something MUST be done, otherwise the madness will continue as the workers struggle and owners slowly but surely go out of business.

But maybe this is the plan.


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

34 responses to “It Is The Government’s Fault”


  1. No matter what increases is given to PSV’s their behaviour will remain the same. What needs to be don’t is slapping some serious jail time on a number of these operators; then and only then will they see that the authorities are serious but the problem is too many people at the top are involved.


  2. ok so the owners have problems with the government but that doesn’t justify their reckleness way of driving. I ain’t done them nothing.


  3. Mr. Inkwell, I know that owners cannot afford to take the buses off the road, but do you not believe that it is time they make the sacrifice and do just that?

    When will they accept, that the authorities could not care less about them or their plight ad do something other than complain?

    When will they realize that, as long as they accept the blatant discrimination, by paying the punitive taxes and insurance premiums yearly, no one will take their complaints seriously, but will continue to take them for granted?

    Other business people demand concessions from the government by indicating how many people they employ and how much the business contributes to the economy. What is the matter with them, are they not business people too?


  4. The present administration has provided “free” bus transport for school children. One of the stated reasons for this measure was to get the children away from the “ZR culture”. Soon after implementation of this policy, someone even said that principals of schools were claiming that children were coming to school on time and more focused on schoolwork. Now what has happened?!! The Prime Minister is summoning the same principals and the Minister of Education to discuss the bad behaviour of school children on the streets and in schools. Maybe the source of the problem was never the ZRs but was the children. Further, it should be noted that the PM will never summon principals to discuss promoting Maths, Science and Technology or the performing arts or the service clubs and associations (cadets, scouts, key club) or 4H. These adults love to wallow in the salacious and sordid stories of the bad behaviour of the few.


  5. It would appear that the society is on the brink of anarchy, precipitated by exuberant and rebellious school children. Ban drums, ban horns, ban minibuses and ZRs, ban cell phones and cameras, lock the toilets… where and when will it end? How de yutes get so?

    Meanwhile, away from the glare of public, corrupt and hypocritical adults, engage in all manner of nefarious activities.


  6. Children are very good at imitating what they see adults doing. We spend too much time on the few jackasses while we neglect the many, many young people who are talented and eager to make a positive contribution to Barbados.


  7. @Anonymous

    What are you sayin ? Haven’t you heard that it only takes one bad apple to spoil a barrell. The parents of these misfits should be ashamed of themselves.What de hell are you thinking or smoking?


  8. So what are you going to do about them? Lock them up?!! Most (nearly all) youngsters are good persons with some potential for contribution to the continual progress of this country. I believe too much “talk” is made over the behaviour of a few with little solution driven action to really address identified problems. Further the country has to recognise, advertise and enhance the talent and the good work that many of our youngsters do. That “bad apple” metaphor is grossly overstated. Many young people will actually reject the “bad apples” especially when adults consistently, fairly, reasonably and unequivocally indicate disapproval with bad behaviour.


  9. We have to admit if we tear ourselves away from the negative culture which the industry projects the government has done a lousy job of regulating. We can even see the Transport Board which has always separated itself from the PSV culture now getting sucked in. As a society we can keep fooling ourselves as yet another aspect to our way of life deteriorates.


  10. and the plot thickens, government proposes to bring an amendment to the legislation to ban school children from riding on PSVs


  11. @David

    How de hell is the government going to do that. Futhermore think about the revenue the owners would lose and also jobs. Is this a sign of desperation on the PM part not knowing how to deal with the social ills of our society.The fact that these kids are not wellmannered is a problem from the home.


  12. If the government and the authorities cannot control kids and other persons on bicycles on our streets, how can they be expected to control hardened and determined pig-headed psv drivers and operators


  13. The bad behaviour on the roads by PSV’s i believe boils down to two things.

    *1. The high financial pressures placed on them is the number one cause.*

    It causes them to hussle in order to make a profit. If you have to pay the governmetn high fees before you make a profit common sense says to me persons are going stop for a pasenger even if not at the bus stop though it is a risk, speed along our roads in order to rapidly turn over passenger etc etc etc.

    *2. Indiscipline drivers*

    These drivers need to lose their licences after a certain amount of encounters with the law. There is no need to send them to jail to burden government. Government would therefore not need to keep taxes high on the PSV’s in order to keep these persons in prison.

    If we can reduce the operating cost of the PSV’s i believe this would help in reducing the amount of indiscipline displayed by PSV drivers on our roads. It would also reduce the operating cost, and manpower needed by our police force in seeking out bad behave drivers and conductors. Government will gain from this as well.


  14. This article is bare Shite !

    Hogwash

    Pure shite !

    The PSVs do a good job and provide a service without which , this country would be in a total mess. Just because you got a few clowns, you are going to condemn the entire body of PSV drivers, conductors and owners. Man =go to France -do !


  15. Just to put in my two cents. I agree that the government is to blame because as I’ve said for years, if you ask someone to compete and then disadvantage them at every turn, they will find ways to survive. The Transport Board is in trouble and cannot support itself, even though they pay less taxes etc. How then does the government expect the PSV Operators to survive under the same conditions without assistance? If the Transport Board has assistance and is still not profitable, how can it be fare to ask the private operators to function without assistance?


  16. The sad reality is that successive government have tried the draconian tax witholding strategies with little success. It is time to depart from it. What is the role of the Barbados Transport Authority?


  17. A serous matter you think? It has been for a long time. A proper regulatory framework for PSVs is required. From a PR standpoint the minibus association calling out to run the public transportation system is not smart.

    BAD VIBES

    by GERCINE CARTER

    GOVERNMENT’S move to ban school children from privately operated public service vehicles (PSV) is a national security issue.

    Attorney General Freundel Stuart said the mooted ban was being examined within "a national security framework".

    Stuart said the bad behaviour of schoolchildren on PSVs was discussed at a meeting last week, with the National Security Council chaired by Prime Minister David Thompson and attended by Minister of Education Ronald Jones, the president of the Barbados Association of Principals of Secondary Schools, Dr Winston Crichlow and the Acting Chief Education Officer, Laurie King.

    "It [the bad behaviour] has national security implications which the police have drawn to our attention and we are dealing with it," the Attorney General said.

    The Attorney General spoke to the SUNDAY SUN in Independence Square Friday evening after officially launching year-long celebrations marking the 175th anniversary of the Royal Barbados Police Force.

    "As recently as two evenings ago," he said, "we were looking at the whole national security situation. We zeroed in very closely and very seriously on what has been happening to our schoolchildren and what has been happening to them on those public service vehicles."

    He continued: "We paid close attention to that entire issue. The Government has it under close observation and at the appropriate time we will let this country know what menu of measures we are putting in place to roll back the indiscipline which we are seeing manifested amongst schoolchildren."

    Stuart also said it was "madness" to believe that the Government could not ban schoolchildren from travelling on the PSVs.

    "It is not true to say we cannot ban them," he said.

    He was responding to a senior lawyer’s suggestion that such a measure would be illegal.

    Stuart said however that a ban "is not the first option that the Government would want to exercise.

    "What we have been trying to do is get the public service vehicle people to exercise some sense of responsibility. Just announcing a ban is not the issue."

    Stuart said: "There are many other ancilliary issues involved and we have been looking at them as a National Security Council because it is not now simply a question of the indiscipline among schoolchildren."

    Asked about the capacity of the Transport Board to meet the travelling needs of schoolchildren and the rest of the public adequately, Stuart replied: "We are looking at the situation wholistically with a view to ensuring that any action we take does not create imbalances that result in more problems than the ones we had before."

    "When we have taken a wholistic view
    and looked at an inter-agency response, that is the point at which we will make our position known."

    Last Friday, some ZR and minibus drivers said that they would welcome such a ban, since they were "fed-up" with the "unruly, bad-behaved and disgusting behaviour" of some schoolchildren.

    Government’s consideration of the ban was revealed last week by the minister of education.

    He said they were looking to pass empowering legislation within six months.

    gercinecarter@nationnews.com


  18. The overwhelming majority of schoolchildren in Barbados are good and well behaved. Yet the AG is reported to have said “We zeroed in very closely and very seriously on what has been happening to our schoolchildren and what has been happening to them on those public service vehicles”. Like the infamous “large numbers of illegal Guyanese”, the AG has not given any measure of the scale of the numbers of children misusing the PSVs but proceeds to promise a “menu of measures”. This is an administration that likes to cry wolf. Does anyone remember the hand wringing over the Public Service Act? Didn’t the DLP (when in opposition) walk out of Parliament when it was first debated (my memory may be wrong on this though)? Well I hope citizens take a look at the amendments made by this DLP administration. These are best described by the term used by the parliamentary documents summarizing the amendments i.e. NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE. So like the issues of the Public Service act, land use and tourism, immigration, agriculture, restructuring control of the economy, the rising cost of living etc I predict the outcome after the hullabaloo has died down will be “NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE!”

  19. ''''''FIRE'''''' Avatar
    ”””FIRE”””

    YES THERE IS SIGNIFICANT CHANGE
    FROM THE BLP TO THE DLP
    FROM GOOD TO BAD
    FROM BAD TO WORSE
    FROM WORSE TO WUSS
    FROM WUSS TO WUSSA
    FROM WUSSA TO WOW !! WHERE WILL IT END ?


  20. am imissing something here?only a politician can think that baning children from psvs would curb personnel behaviour.By the way these kids are going to be illmannered and downright disrespectful no matter which form of transportation they take.
    They must be a better solution to this problem.


  21. A policeman made the telling observation last week. He said the police with all of its limited resources will have to enforce the law to ban children from the PSVs the same way it has to enforce the no loud music. Do you get the point.


  22. However the loud music is still prevelant . I think these children should be reported to the school they are attending and suspended.That would send a message to parent and child that this kind of bad behaviour is not going to tolerated.


  23. Maybe the schools need to issue picture ID cards which would be mandatory for thekids to wear when using public transport or PSVs in that way the children would be easily identified and be reported to the school they are attending .


  24. I found this piece on the BLP’s website and thought I would share it with you.

    “Prosperity and Growth Under the BLP- But Decline, Hardship & Drought Under Dems Rule

    Given the rate at which the DLP is said to be imploding, the decline of that tired and un-impressive outfit is imminent. Many now accept that the DLP’ Cabinet in really incapable of being sensibly reshuffled because on every occasion, the result will be the same.

    The DLP is good evidence that incompetence is not something — rather, the absence of something.

    And so, the DLP is slowly being asphyxiated by its inability to respond to the challenges and the demands of the global recession. Its manufactured fiscal crisis really does not help. And since the DLP does not know what it is doing, the extent of the problem this country faces – worsens daily.

    So that, with Barbadians feeling the severe pain of the ruling party’ incompetence, deep within their pockets and bank accounts, with each passing day – the ailing DLP loses more of its once tight grip on places like St. John and St. Lucy, which have been its traditional comfort zones.

    The ruling party’s record-decline is reflected both in an increasing number of people being turned off when it speaks and by the large numbers who are saying: “NO” to its broken promises; gimmicks and political stunts. Can you imagine that at a time when seriousness is required, this country has a sad Government, which engages in talk, tours, travel, a promise here-and-there and a weekly fete?

    The people of this country have serious doubts whether they can trust their Government. Barbadians really did not expect that a Government they voted for – could so willing surrender the sovereign of this country to the IMF or Washington, or to any other power – foreign or domestic, for that matter – without their approval.

    So that the biggest recent blow to the tired and stale Dems came when the IMF praised the DLP for its policies. But why shouldn’t the IMF! After all, what are being paraded as DLP policies, in fact – carry a: “Made in Washington Label.“ The Opposition knows this so too CTUSAB and those patriotic Private Sector officials who are capable of independent thought.

    There are therefore signs of a shift in power within this country. The people know and agree that prosperity will not return, with a DLP outfit, which does not know what to do or what it is doing – dangerously mismanaging this country‘s economy. They are also outraged and are aware that

    the recently held national consultation was purely cosmetic because at the time it was taking place – key DLP players were said to have been in Washington, being instructed – having also been there a few weeks before the consultation was held.

    But whether the people, who can bring-back economic stability and prosperity to this country – will have an easier task at convincing the people, than the political stunts and gimmicks of a known politically incompetent; tired; stale and ailing DLP, which does not know what to do or what it is doing – is left to been seen

    . Free nesses have always been more alluring than hard work and delivery – even when the evidence of such is overwhelming. The DLP knows this only too well”.
     


  25. All that is happening is that the mini-bus/ZR culture is being transferred to the Transport Board buses. It is now the norm to see passengers on the gov’tment buses eating, drinking and playing their music. Also this new breed of T B drivers are drivung wild since many of them used to drive the said mini-bus and ZR’s. I have even seen them pickup a friend who would stand next to the driver for the entire trip and carry on a conversation. All these things are what were brought over from the PSV culture. The school children are now pushing against the adults for seats, or when the adult gets into the bus, there is a bag or something already in the seat and the adult dare not move it. The bahaviour on the bus is the worstand sometimes there are even fights on the bus and the driver has to stop and allow the adults to protect themselves.This country has big problems with our school children.I was on a bus recently and the children were behaving really badly and the worst behaved one didn’t even have a bajan accent.


  26. royal rumble —go ahead ——go ahead
    you are so right

    I could kiss you
    THOMPSON SAID HE WANTED ALL THE SEATS IN THE NEXT ELECTIONS.

    HE MEANT THAT HE WANTED THEM LOST THATS WHAT HE MEANT.


  27. I am seeing a big result
    The DLP should not only lose the elections but they should lose by a big big margin.
    I dont think that they will be able to fool the people again with the gimmicks of Billboards and fetes but watcout they might get nasty and dirty

    Anyhow Thompson get what he wanted and that was -to be callled Prime Minister.

    He can go his way now
    Thompson MUST –GO !!!!

  28. minibus driver Avatar
    minibus driver

    minibus drivers can not make children behave like wild animals is it how they brought up by their parents . so do not blame the P S V . blame those parents . minibus owner need to come together and say ” NO MORE SCHOOL CHILDREN ” TRY IT THEN SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN. bring bmw for them if that can change them to better.


  29. The PSVs took a day off today and met at Brandons in a show of strength. According to Morris Lee one of heads of the PSV association over 100 operators responded.

    In a surprising announcement he stated that the minibus/Zr association will approach government to back his indigenous association to purchase the Barbados stake in the BNB.

  30. minibus driver Avatar

    let the insurance company put the ban on music on psv . simple is that . they can stop it at once the bad behaviour of psv music . without the insurance policy they can’t go on the road . let them choose between the music and the insurance policy . so let the minister force the insurance company in renew ing the psv policy . bring the tough rules for them . it will certainly help to weed the bad APPLES FROM THE PSV BASKETS


  31. It’s interesting that the private P.S.V’s are not mandated to provide a transport service, but have been able to do so for the past 19 years on the same $1.50 fare.

    Seems to me that that in the absence of a subsidy they must be making a profit.


  32. To the scout.I see that you clearly dont use public transport.You have nothing but negative comments,instead of looking at the problem you are offering the solution.Was the government to make the playing field a fair one,i garantee you that the problem wont be so severe. how can you put one rule in place for all yet support only one of the players. The transport board has busses that are far bigger than the mini bus or zr for that matter,yet pay less than them and carry more.The driver of a transport board bus have a fixed pay while the psv have a pay by passenger.The police ignore the transport board bus overloaded and stopping where ever YET THE PSV DONT GET THIS LIBERTY.Whose fault is it then MR SCOUT.I am sure that if you took a fair look then you would think different.Our prime minister gave school children free rides on transport buses [SOMETHING THEY ABUSE DAILY] yet the psv cant take 150 from them.FURTHER TO THE POINT BLAME THEM FOR THE LEWD BEHAVIOUR.Somthing i am of the opinion all politicians must take blame for.These children do the same things on the government bus and they dont have music.When are we the adults going to look at the problems and stop cast blame on the wrong people.I think the prime minister made a mistake with good intentions in mind.What i think he MUST do is curfew the free travel on the buses that will help the problem.STOP BLAME THE PSV WORKERS WHO WORK FOR LESS THAN MINUMUM WAGE AND SEE WHERE THE TOP BRASS WENT WRONG.


  33. This is a good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
    Brief but very accurate info… Thanks for sharing this one.

    A must read post!

The blogmaster invites you to join and add value to the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading