Former Prime Minister Freundel Stuart in a rare public appearance since the last general election delivered a speech last Sunday at the DLP St. Philip North branch meeting. Thanks to Piece the Legend for the following audio snippet. So far the blogmaster has not been able to locate the full speech by Stuart (some people will say disappointing).
Additional link posted by Ping Ping.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
saturday allows more people to be able to vote and it is not a normal day to work it is less disruptive. people could shop and then vote or vice versa. i would venture to say voting on a workday is much more disruptive
as regard to punishment re blacks, that is nonsense that i would not even address. restrict your arguments to the points in issue and please dont throw in dog whistle comments.
yes the Adventists worship on saturdays but they dont the entire day. i am sure that God would excuse breaking the sabbath to vote. as jesus said, if your sheep falls in a well on the sabath would you not rescue it?
@Hal Austin February 20, 2020 1:37 PM “Bajans complain about paying any form of taxes.”
And who has been complaining about taxes on this thread?
What I commended on were the idiotic statements from some people about “free” education, and “free” health care etc. and about taking such “freeness” away from Bajans. . I pointed out quite correctly that Bajans are taxed heavily to pay for the “free” education enjoyed by our own biological children, and by the children of other Bajans, and for the “free” healthcare enjoyed by many of us, perhaps most of us.
These things have never been “free”. They have always been tax funded.They are not gifts to us from the political class. We pay our taxes, and WE PAY THE POLITICAL CLASS as well.
Why then Greene would you suggest fining people who choose not to vote? Fines are widely regarded as punishments, especially fines imposed by the well paid political and judicial class, on poor people who need to hold on to every possible cent in order to hold their families together.
Why suggest fining people for not voting.
And the Adventists and the few Jews in our community may not want you or your interpretation of Scripture deciding for them. Some people are diligent in keeping the Sabbath, and it is their Constitutional right to do so.
And neither you nor I can decide for the devout.
So give FJS his due, he is a solid orator. During his two hour magical mystery tour, he pulled a few punches, ducked a few more, and between his index finger waving and intentional pauses (I en gine near Sofocles nor Tacitus) took a unique path on some events.
The overall thrust seemed to be, his decade was not better nor worse than any which preceded him. There were things done and things not done. They did their best. The electorate judged, their best wasn’t acceptable.
On financial matters, he chose to employ the rarely used metric of DEFICIT to GDP. Appreciate, deficit is a time limited, annual measure. It resets to zero every calendar year. In doing so, he took selective historical annual measures, which made some of the years of his terms, line up well with previous administrations. He avoided the fact that in 2013 & 2014, the Deficit to GDP was at 30%, not the low single digit numbers he quoted. And thereby completely avoided the metric of deficit+deficit+deficit+deficit+deficit+deficit+deficit etc = DEBT. It was the overall DEBT accumulation which killed Bim.
His spin on corruption, naturally avoided DI. And while he told who the purveyors of ‘brown envelopes’ were, he stopped short of shedding light upon the recipients. One doubts the purveyors and recipients are one and the same?
Not that we didn’t know, [I recall it came via OSA, during the DLP decade] the significant, but declining tax contribution made by the offshore sector. It paid a lot of bills.
Possibly my greatest amusement, came from his new found insights on the value of communication. Given his sparse public utterances when in power, and the 20 months to hear from him since, the promise of ‘more to come’ likely means sometime just before the next election. Bring it on. He is rarely relevant, but fun to listen to.
Silly woman,
there will be some disruption no doubt but i believe this is the least disruptive day. we can move it to sunday if the Xians are more amenable that Jews or Adventists.
i am going into any tangential argument with you over fining or punishing black people. you seem to veer toward emotive issues as tho it stimulates something in you. i will steer clear for the moment except to say this.
politics and voting are v crucial to the functioning of a country. people fought and died for the RIGHT to vote. the RIGHT to determine their future thru the electoral process. here now we have sometimes less than the voting population deciding the fate of a country. that cannot stand. you live in a country you benefit from how it functions you ought to participate in how those that run it are elected.
Like
Lorenzo February 20, 2020 6:02 PM
Artax you ssked Greene , Donks and the other Dems on here some pointed questions Mr Stuart should have answered in his so called brillant speech which as expected he did not touch. Up comes the so called neutral Skinner to deflect your critism of Mr Stuart to talk about Ms Mottley in the interest of balance.I thought the blog was onr Stuart how did Ms Mottley get in?I have stated on here before that anytime you are critical of the Dems Skinner numps in to defend them which tells me he is a Dem despite his denials.As for Austin we can ignore him since anyone agreeing with the Dem jackass would have to be one himself. By the way where is Mariposa now the Dems are in the spotlight getting real licks.
@ Lorenzo
Be honest. I never deflected or disagreed with @ Artax. My first statement was: “ Point taken”. I then went on to explain that internal cannibalism is within both parties. Nothing I wrote was a lie. I even stated that I “ had no quarrel “with @ Artax and his position on the NDP / Haynes. I responded and told him I was only here to cement my position that in the Duopoly all negatives are duplicated. It’s a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Please take your time and read my comments carefully. As always a very pleasant weekend to you and yours. Continue to defend the party of your choice. You are a Barbadian and that’s your right. The reason that I often respond to you is very simple: you seem to be a very mild mannered person and you are never nasty.
As for @ Artax: I find him to be one of the most objective contributors to BU.
Like it or lump it:
The Duopoly Rules
“What about removing so-called free tertiary education?”
@ David BU
I’m in agreement with most of Greene’s opinions on this issue.
Greene suggested “means testing.” Sometime ago, I suggested “means testing” as a method of determining those impecunious individuals who should benefit from social services.
A brilliant ‘butterfly’ informed this forum my suggestion meant government would have to establish another government department and “employ another two thousand people to process the means test applicants.”
“So give FJS his due, he is a solid orator.”
So that is what yall like, bullshit talk with no substance, no reality, no useful action, even less truth and with even more corruption attached, no wonder the island is in it’s current go nowhere blighted plight…and will stay that way until the electorate realizes, that TALK IS CHEAP.
@ William
Have you noticed how the discussion has moved from Stuart’s right to address his party members and supporters to one about the content of his speech. There are two different arguments.
As a former leader of the party and prime minister, Mr Stuart has a democratic right to speak to his members and explain what went wrong under his watch. That is not only free speech, but what democracy is about.
However, it is another matter when one examines the speech he did give. It was rhetoric over substance, but that is part of our political culture, the Barbados Condition. We prefer big speeches above content, flamboyance above quality, and in that sense he was addressing his home base.
But the speech was deceptive, quite frankly, misleading. His claim to external shocks sounded good, but it was economic illiteracy. He clearly had read a couple articles on external shocks (including that by Owen Arthur) and felt he was on top of the subject. He was not. The over use of the NIS as a piggy bank? Over-dependence on China? The Donville Inniss affair and what it said about his government?
Stuart still has a lot of explaining to do, but barking and howling on a web site by his opponents will not help us to discover the mistakes made and how best to improve matters going forward.
Let me end on this: I think we will do a lot better if we were to concentrate on debating ideas rather than drifting in to personal insults and abuse, even if that is the Barbados way. It does not intimidate anyone and all it does is keep intelligent people away from the blog. With me, if people want to get in the sewer, it is not a nice place, but I can follow..
@Artax
How we treat with education is complicated. There is a reason why Barbados ranked high on the HDi compared to most countries. If we change or dismantle the existing, we have to be sure to anticipate the ripple effect. We saw it when student registration at rhe UWI declinesd sharply when the former government made the change. Have we studied how the youth cohort was affected? We have middleclass in name only in Barbados. It is a fickle sector. This blogmaster is not against making changes mind you, it must be done with careful thought given the type of society we want to encourage.
Do they still teach English grammar in Barbados?
Did Muslims discover the breadfruit tree?
@ Hal
We are what we eat. As I have stated a blog is no different from a government or school. It depends on the culture- the ethos. We talk about good governance until our party is in power.
As was recently stated if you are a Barbadian and you don’t follow the Bajan pride you can” F “off. Whatever that means.
Like I said it’s about the culture-the ethos.
And then we cry crocodile tears when the youth take up guns and blast each other off the planet.
Yes my Brother accept the standards or “ F” off- whatever that means.
It is rum shop William.
@ David
I keep telling you to stop denigrating rum shops. Most rum shops had rules. Most shop keepers were leaders in their communities. Apparently the ones you are familiar with had no standards. Rum shop owners were influential political power brokers. You know nothing of genuine rum shop culture.
William the blogmaster has visited many rumshops and still does – the vernacular in many cases vary between the bland and colourful. Sensibilities cannot be that raw to be offended if one is told the F word read frig you or frig off. Lol.
@ David
And a very pleasant weekend to you and yours Sir. You had the last word. Next time you visit your favorite watering hole fire one for me. Peace.
@Hal
i have been made to understand that this is just the beginning of Stuart’s explanation of what went on during his leadership, if he is allowed to continue that is. hope he does not get shy because of the backlash from the negrocrats.
it is interesting to note that no other ex PM has ever discussed what happened under their tenure but i believe this is a good start for history’s sake and to learn lessons.
to continue what i would change about how we carry out the business of elections and governance- i would establish a fix date for elections.
however i would maintain the practice of snap elections when the PM deems that conditions are favourable or there is a need to call one outside the fix date.
if called after half the 5 year term has passed a new fixed date will be set. if before, the fix date will stand. the same goes for elections called if a no confidence vote is successful of in cases where a majority cross the floor.
i would change the senate and have local representations outside the established party structure, depending on the population. they would be elected in the same election as above and subject to the same above election rules. they are to be independent and cannot be affiliated to any political party. their business would be to function as the voice of the people.
there is a matter of the power structure and i would make the HOA the superior body with the power to veto the senate with a majority 2/3 vote but not the other way around. the senate would be able to pass matters to the HOA for discussion and ratification in terms of laws and policies and be able to discuss and vote on matters coming from the HOA but only can veto such matters for a year, in which time there can be compromise. if not the HOA matters stand.
i have more but will leave it there for now
@Greene
Do a search of BU archives using governance or parliament. We have discussed this issue on BU many times.
ok- cool. my bad. you can delete if you want. no worries
That was not the intention Greene. Make your points, it was mentioned if you had time to review as a resource. You guys are too sensitive!
you know what i thought you would say that. lol. i really meant that you could delete it and it wont bother me. hahaha. i am not that uptight, you know
man we must learn not to take ourselves seriously and not to read into things, man.
This is all the sell out negro is good for, robbing their own people to maintain a fraudulent lifestyle….thieves…a lot of them want hanging.
“The U.S. is opposing plans by Nigeria’s government to hand about $100 million the American authorities say was stolen by deceased former dictator Sani Abacha to a top ruling party official.
The disagreement may hamper future cooperation between the two nations to recover state money moved offshore by Abacha, who Transparency International estimates may have looted as much as $5 billion during his 1993-98 rule. A commitment by Nigeria to transfer the funds to Kebbi state Governor Abubakar Bagudu appears to undermine Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari’s pledge to quell rampant graft in Africa’s top oil producer.
The U.S. Department of Justice says Bagudu was involved in corruption with Abacha. The DoJ also contends that the Nigerian government is hindering U.S. efforts to recover allegedly laundered money it says it’s traced to Bagudu. Buhari’s administration says a 17-year-old agreement entitles Bagudu to the funds and prevents Nigeria from assisting the U.S., according to recent filings from the District Court for the District of Columbia in Washington.”
Although I agree “that no other ex PM has ever discussed what happened under their tenure,”……..
………….. it is ALSO interesting to note NO OTHER PM was DEFEATED at the polls X-0.
And, should we not believe this ‘achievement,’ in addition to constantly being asked to speak about his tenure and described as “the worst PM Barbados ever had,” did not have anything to do with him to “breaking his silence.?”
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not ‘TELLING’ Stuart what he should explain or not. The political rhetoric and jokes do not impress me. They are best left for the political platform, where it serves its purpose and not for serious issues such as this.
But, if “this is just the beginning of Stuart’s EXPLANATION of what went on DURING his leadership,” let hope on the next occasions, he EXPLAINS:
….. The CAHILL fiasco, which was exposed by BU;
….. Hal Gollop’s $M fees;
….. Donville;
….. Why did the DLP went into the gutter to leak, to the public, information from former Transport Board’s employee Lisa Marshall’s personal file, to insinuate she was a thief, just because the views she expressed about not being paid her severance payment on each date it was promised, was reported by the media?
….. Why did the former Beautify Barbados employees had to wait 3 years before being paid severance?
….. Why did he not discipline Denis Lowe for not adhering to the “last in, first out protocol, when the former NHC employees were retrenched?
….. Renewing work contracts of political appointees 1 or 2 days before the general elections?
…….. and other things, too numerous to mention.
“I believe this (would be) a good start for history’s sake and to learn lessons.”
And, REMEMBER…….. Freundel Stuart CHOSE to “BREAK HIS SILENCE,”…… NOT Barrow, Tom, Bree, Sandi, OSA, David or Mia.
Also, A TIME WILL COME when Mottley will have to answer for issues such as inviting those alleged “drug lords” to parliament; amending the Constitution to facilitate the appointment of certain Senators, INCLUDING one APPOINTED by the Governor General; giving her father a knighthood; appointing the LARGEST Cabinet in Barbados’ history, with some ministers having what could only be described as “HALF DAY JOBS,”
Artax,
yes let’s hope so. in the meantime hold your horses and cool your heels. you may have a while to wait given PM Stuart’s proclivity to be very deliberate and to pick his time v carefully.
talk, talk, talk bout everything, thing, thing and deliver little, little, little. what a brilliant line!!!!
FORMER PM Stuart. Thankfully!
“BTW I don’t recall the NDP ever forming the government although at one stage it was the Opposition.”
I cannot remember Ms Mottley as the leader of any Government when the BLP was cannibalising itself.
Some of your responses at time do lead me to conclude that internally you association with the DLP has not been entirely broken.
Not bringing tales out of school but could not have been more no more than about eight years ago when your support for the DLP in debate at the wake of our dear mutual friend in Atlanta was overwhelming
@ Greene
You’re ‘getting too worked up’ over what can only be described as a political game. It impresses you.
Mottley, wants to be viewed as the PM who is “awake on the job.” That’s why she is at ‘every cock fight,’ and talking about everything, even if it means “making up thing just to make things interesting.”
Stuart was viewed as “sleeping on the job.” He was seen as a man who, at times when he needed to be heard on serious issues confronting the island, opted to remain silent or “crack a joke.” He once likened a credit rating downgrade to garbage being collected by the SSA.
With that in mind, the opposite is equally applicable to Stuart:
“don’t talk, talk, talk bout anything, thing, thing and deliver nothing, nothing, nothing.”
That too, is “a brilliant line!!!!”
Or, perhaps you may be willing to list for us the significant objectives Barbados achieved “given PM Stuart’s proclivity to be very deliberate and to pick his time v carefully” and as a result of him remaining silent?”
@ Charles Skeete
I have never been associated with the DLP or BLP. There are no tales to bring out of school since as an independent thinker , I dismissed the DLP since 1974 Public Order Act. Quite recently I was called and castigated by a Dee for saying on BU that it’s too early to assess PM Mottley.
What you cannot grasp is that if I have to defend a policy of the Duopoly , I will support it. For example I support the efforts now being made to reform education; on BU , I recently supported PM Mottley for not attending the meeting with Pompeo.
You know full well that I was never a Dee so there are no ties to be broken.
As for any conversation/ debate ; as an independent thinker and one who was comprehensively rejected at the polls, I have earned the right to have an opinion.I carry the scars of battle against the Duopoly. I went to the frontline.
I have long distanced myself from Duopoly nonsense. It matters not whether cannibalism occurs in government or opposition. The simple fact is that there is cannibalism within the Duopoly. Peace, my Brother.
Artax,
cant wait for Froons next public appearance. i may be a long wait but i am looking forward to another snappy one liner that sums up MAM
@Greene
Say what you want Mia Mottley has already surpassed Stuart in the public perception index.
@ Greene
I don’t give a shit what one liners Stuart uses to sum up MAM. The same one liners, with a few adjustments, as I have proven, can be used to equally sum up him.
With that out of the way, let’s get down to some serious business.
It seems as though you’ve conveniently ignored a critique of Stuart’s speech, which was posted by Mr. Austin this morning at 4:29 AM. Or, you’ve purposely refused to comment on it, in preference to discussing how “magnificent (a) speaker (Stuart is) with a great command of the language and knows how to work the crowd,” “his take down of Mottley using the oft repeated phrase to describe his reticence was nothing short of brilliant,” or, in your words, “parroting” what he says.
Oh, I forgot you’re “a sucker for great political rhetoric, which, in reality is best suited for the political platform and not for serious debate.
However, let me remind you, but before I do so, let me state up front that I agree with the author’s assessment and it is not my intention to attack or insult him.
“However, it is another matter when one examines the speech he did give. It was rhetoric over substance, but that is part of our political culture, the Barbados Condition. We prefer big speeches above content, flamboyance above quality, and in that sense he was addressing his home base.”
“But the speech was deceptive, quite frankly, misleading. His claim to external shocks sounded good, but it was economic illiteracy. He clearly had read a couple articles on external shocks (including that by Owen Arthur) and felt he was on top of the subject. He was not. The over use of the NIS as a piggy bank? Over-dependence on China? The Donville Inniss affair and what it said about his government?”
Over to you, Mr. Greene.
@ Greene
Has Stuart written his speech, or did he ad lib, in Bajan style?
artax,
hold your horses, in due course all will be answered. how long that takes depends on ex PM Stuart. he is no longer a politician so he doesnt have to deliver on substance (that is for the Busy Bee Mottley to do).
@Hal,
Stuart appears to be a pedant. so i believe he would have written it down but you never know
Home today with time on my hand…
My Dear Simple,
I must ask this question of you and I hope that your response is an emphatic “No”. Simple to answer “Yes” would diminish you in my eyes and many of the men here.
I dare not ask Dxxxx for I fear her answer would be “Yes”. Please forgive me if you guess who is Dxxxx.
Simple, today I decided to make myself some fried chicken just the way my grandmother used to make it. I know her recipe and I have the ingredients.
I went into the cupboard and I found a half-empty. Yes, I said half-empty. Simple, I have not recall using any and it pains me to see the level of betrayal that was ongoing these many years. I almost started to cry.
I have enjoyed many good and delicious meals from that cupboard and as I there is some pain as I think of those meals and the continuous betrayal hiding in the cupboard.
Simple, in that cupboard I found a half-empty bottle of burnt sugar.
Who buys burnt sugar? How difficult is it to make burnt sugar for brwoning? Were those tasty and beautiful looking pieces of chicken that I enjoyed over the years were contaminated (colored) with bought store burnt sugar?
Simple, I am counting on you to restore my faith in women. Let me know that there are still women out there who can make their own browning. Please answer the question, honestly. I will survive whatever your answer is.
Have you ever bought burnt sugar?
Broken-hearted
TheO
The person who invented typos must be filthy rich (if he is paid for every typo).
@ Artax February 21, 2020 10:31 AM
“DURING his leadership,” let hope on the next occasions, he EXPLAINS:
….. The CAHILL fiasco, which was exposed by BU;
….. Hal Gollop’s $M fees;
….. Donville;
….. Why did the DLP went into the gutter to leak, to the public, information from former Transport Board’s employee Lisa Marshall’s personal file, to insinuate she was a thief, just because the views she expressed about not being paid her severance payment on each date it was promised, was reported by the media?
….. Why did the former Beautify Barbados employees had to wait 3 years before being paid…”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Artax, you have forgotten to retrieve from your archive of Lord Fumble’s bleak bleeps, blunders and foul-ups his arrantly dismissive (and rather blasé) attitude towards the South Coast sewerage disaster which, effectively, was the last straw to break the back of the camel called the investors/stakeholders in the hotel and tourism industry in Barbados.
His offensively outlandish claim that tourists are accustomed to wading through sewage on the streets in the UK and America could only emanate from the mouth of a mad denizen who had escaped from the same busted sewer which, according to Bush Tea’s assessment, was caused by the implanting of the trident on the Garrison as a clear sign of the arrival of the devil with his pitchfork forged in the DLP-created hell.
How could that loose-lipped ‘classless’ fool make such an outrageous claim that the Bajan sewage situation was no big fuss?
It was the Achilles heel of the Bajan bread and butter basket, you King of Clowns from the blackened house of Stuart!
Isn’t that equivalent to a waiter- while serving hotel guests- spitting into the soup on his way to their tables and, in full view of all, claiming to be adding a touch of “je ne sais quoi” to the Bajan-made casserole?
Do not forget credit ratings from the international agencies do not matter.
@TheOGazerts February 21, 2020 2:29 PM “Have you ever bought burnt sugar?”
Dear Theo: Let not your heart be troubled. Of course I have NEVER EVER bough burnt sugar. i always make my own as my dear mother taught me in her own kitchen. I typically make about 1 pint at a time. I store it in a bottle in the fridge and it is always ready when i want to make something like a lovely chicken stew with home grown beets and carrots as i did earlier this week.
If you will ask your sweetie, nicely, nicely I am sure that she will make some for you.
Don’t for get to thank her afterwards.
Let me suggest some ways…
Theo,
My grandmother made the caramelization process look so easy I never bothered to practise it so when i tried to on my own there were a few failures and my stews were bitter. So…… yes, i resorted to store bought browning for use when i was in a hurry.
Still got some in my cupboard even though I have now mastered it. Won’t be using it tonight.
On subject, as far as I can see, in Barbados – in the eastern Caribbean, for that matter – it’s the same shyte different day.
As much as we despised Fumble, along comes Queen Mia, a ray of sunshine accompanied by hopeful words like “transparency” and “accountability”, we elect her and all of her uncommunicative minions, and eventually discover that it is her panties that are transparent and WE are to be accountable – through our taxes and inconveniences due to increased bureaucracy.
It is like they demoted the functionally illiterate 4 post-University Degree senior civil servants to write new day-time laws for us and serve us our drivers licences.
My subject is aviation. The following needs repeating, because I think most people are not aware that Queen Mia crashed the negotiations for adding some US$20 million to the Barbados Treasury in exchange for LIAT shares, at the same time handing Antigua ample justification for taking that same money and investing it directly into LIAT, diluting the Barbados shares.
Then Queen Mia met THREE TIMES with the unknowing, unwilling, ignorant knotty heads who had been running LIAT into the ground for at least the last 15 years to ask THEM what to do next. Not consultants, not established aviation experts, just these brainless knotty-heads. If you have a problem with your car, do you take it to a wreckers yard?
Further, in her arrogance she did not have a single word to say about either of the meetings to the public – the people who paid all of her expenses THREE TIMES to St. Vincent and back to have a chat with fools who probably need help getting dressed.
When Queen Mia was elected, a friend called, said that Queen Mia had asked locals and diaspora for help because the DLP had left the country in such a mess. He suggested that with my experience and qualifications I see what I could do to help. So I spent three days creating a 20-page report on the state of aviation affairs in Barbados and then LIAT. With the help of my friend I met with one of Queen Mia’s inner circle, gave him a print-out, and he was to take it and give it to the regal one.
Well, I heard that 20-page paper went astray, so I found FOUR more people to email a PDF to and deliver it for me, and two of them reported success. I pushed for feedback, and heard that she read some of it, mumbled “Not impressed” and dropped it on a table. That was May, 2018 – nearly 2 years ago.
To date I have not received either an acknowledgement nor a reply.
As a citizen of Barbados I have written to her asking for help finalising my father’s will probate – which is now four years old and still waiting.
The inner circle “friend of the Queen”?? Yeah, he has been dropped too, with not so much as a thank you.
So this fat bitch is not our friend, she uses people and throws them away. Bajans have manners, this oversized sow shits in her muddy sty and rolls around in it.
As a lawyer she knows well what the problems are with lawyers, judges and the legal system, yet has done NOTHING to change it. Do you think things will change? Don’t bet on it, not with LIAT, not with bureaucracy, not with ANYTHING that makes our lives a misery.
And you are complaining about Fumble?
@ BimJim February 21, 2020 8:25 PM
Your comment above is a perfect summary of what is happening.
I applaud your CONTINUAL efforts and encourage you keep speaking out on the side of truth,
One of these days the local fools will wake up, I fear by then the island of Barbados will be over the cliff.
Bimjim you seem to have some sour grapes.By your account you sent a proposal to Ms Mottley which was rejected, so what? You would not be the first or last to experience this.You seem to feel you are entitled or special based on what? Ms Mottley and her party was voted for by the majority of bajans and she would have competent technocrats around her therefore what is your point?The will situation would have predated Ms Mottley so tell us who did you seek help from in the previous government?Lastly bajans will speak of Mr Stuart simply because in my view and many others he was the worst PM we ever had so you could like it or lump it nothing you say will change that view.
Lorenzo, does Queen Mia pay you to attack those who see through her?
Sour grapes my big fat red ass, normal Bajan decency and MANNERS dictate at least an ack to communications. I don’t expect a reply, but at least tell me you received a free donation sent to you without expectation of reward. From this sow I get NOTHING.
When you have a legal problem you see a lawter. When you have a medical problem you see a doctor. When you have an aviation problem, you do NOT gather incompetent knotty heads and politicians and ask “WUFFUH DO? WHUFFUH DO?”
And while you protect Queen Mia, bear in mimd that her first term is not over yet. By next election she may be judged even worse that The Mighty Cuffuffle Fumble.
“As a lawyer she knows well what the problems are with lawyers, judges and the legal system, yet has done NOTHING to change it. Do you think things will change? Don’t bet on it, not with LIAT, not with bureaucracy, not with ANYTHING that makes our lives a misery.”
Still rolling around in shit trying to fool the world, her latest lie is “fighting imperialism” and she was told straight up on FB that she has to start fighting imperialism in Barbados by dismantling the racism, apartheid and disenfranchisement of the Black majority that she too condones and enables her dirty tiefing friends cow, bizzy, maloney, bjerkham etc to continue on the island, so let’s see how she manages to “fight imperialism” we will be sure to remind her when she pretends to forget her lying words at the caricom summit.
Let’s see her fight imperialism when she is yet to get rid of the corruption in the parliament, supreme court, bar association..or among her tiefing minority friends..
@ Bigjim
The president does not do details. She has an attention deficit problem. As I have said before, she is not as clever as her fans think, but she bluffs her way through. That is what lawyers do.
The devil is always in the details, the only people she is fooling are her dumb yardfowls and herself…to fight imperialism the very first thing she will have to do is remove every last COLONIAL SLAVE LAW off Barbados’ statute books that these malicious house negros for leaders have kept there for the last 80 years to line their own pockets, the very same thing Africa will have to do to protect Africans from the savages in the UK like cousin Eugenics Boris.
Then she will have to dismantle racism, apartheid, oppression, suppression and disenfranchisment of the Black majority that the shitehounds for negro leaders have allowed to be practiced by the lice infested minorities for the last 50 years…post fake independence.
Don’t know how else she expects to fight imperialism other than to dismantle the very vehicles that allow it breed, grow and thrive……hope she does not think it can be done just with her empty words alone…but now she has opened that door thinking she was being slick, we shall see.
And if the dimwitted on BU and the dimmerwitted yardfowls have any doubt about what is about to play out…read and weep, so once again your so slick PM who has not a clue, stepped right in it again, so let’s see what she does, now that she knows, because we will see.
“To confirm the new colonial scam to reenslave Africa, one only need look into history of how Portugal and Spain started the slave trade in Africa, first they claimed to be educating Africans by taking them to Portugal in the late 1300s to early 1400s, next came the ultra evil Papal Bull from Nicholas V claiming that Africans everywhere should be robbed and enslaved into perpetuity, they were using their philosophy of Africans being inferior even from back then, an evil edict that Africans obviously don’t know is still active and enforceable today, then came the brutal, evil and savage transatlantic slave trade, this is history repeating itself and if the weak African leaders are still pretending to be unaware because they are mostly so corrupt, it will just be more of the same starting this century, a repeat of colonial evil and massive crimes, particularly genocide against Africans and their descendants, this time it will last thousands of years, making 400 years look like nothing. Eugenics Boris is just doing it in a roundabout way while being quite aware that the Papal Bull is still very much in effect in the 21st century, more fools the African leaders if they allow him to succeed.”
This is what happens when Black sell out leaders don’t have a clue…because they are so materialistic and corrupt, let’s hope they are the first and only ones to be shackled and chained this time around.
The savage UK forcing the descendants of slaves from the Caribbean to pay off slavemasters for decades for losing their human black property, their own ancestors, through their Windrush slave ship scam is ugly, insulting and disrespectful, but nothing compared to what these colonial parasites and criminals have planned next…these criminals have a curse following them stretching back thousands of years from the days of the anglo saxon crowd, they have to continue their crimes against Africans and the African descended until Africa stops them…let’s see if the leaders are too corrupt and blind to do it.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.