If you have an extra $50 to spend, then you can take someone to the cinema to experience 3 hours of the Avengers: EndGame.  If you had an extra $500 to spend, then you could have taken someone to experience about 3 hours of the Buju concert.  With either option, you know that you are paying for fun.

If you had the extra money, then you would not likely be disappointed that you spent it, regardless of how hard you worked for it.  You had it, you spent it, and you enjoyed yourself.  If you had not spent it on fun, then you would probably have spent it on something else, or given it to someone in need.

Since you will have extra money sometime, why not use some of it to get more money?  With the additional money, you can: pay off your debts, help more people in need, and pay for a lot more fun.  So, what can you legally do with an extra $50 or $500 to get more money?

You can play the lottery. However, you will likely lose all of your money quickly.  You can invest it in someone else’s business.  However, they if they desperately needed your investment to keep going, then there may be structural problems with that business, and you may lose that investment.  You can invest it in your own business, but if your business is not yet profitable enough to pay your monthly expenses, then a return should not be expected.

There are steps that you can take to make it probable that any extra money you invest will make more money.  Before investing in any product, ask yourself these two questions.  1)  Are similar products selling well now?  2)  Is it likely that your product will sell when you are ready to bring it to the market?  Once the answer to both of those questions is yes, then ask yourself one more question.  3)  What is likely to cause you to lose all of your money.

Let us test a few money-making ideas.  What about planting, cultivating and selling beans?  Are beans selling now?  Yes.  Will beans likely sell in 2 months when they are reaped?  Yes.  What will probably cause you to lose all of your money invested in this venture?  Crop thefts by monkeys and humans is very likely, and you can do little about it at this time.  So let us think of another product.

What about investing in building a house to sell?  Are houses selling well now?  No, the housing market is depressed.  Will the house likely sell in one year after it is constructed?  No.  The market is likely to continue to be depressed while the economy is under BERT/IMF management.  Note that if the housing market were not depressed, you could have grown your $50 or $500 investment – we will address how in the next article.

What about an example that will work?  That is the challenge.  Before I tested the ideas, I thought that both of them were worthy investments.  However, the test showed that while both ideas are good, they are just not wise investments at this time.

Every product has customers.  One challenge is to identify those who are willing to purchase your produce before you invest in it.  The euphoria of coming-up with a good idea leads many to make an emotional decision.  They then prematurely invest their money and lose it.  Testing the idea with the questions reduces the risk that you will make an emotional decision.

You can reduce the risk of failure by selecting a product from what you normally purchase in one week, and making a business out of it.  For example, you probably eat breakfast, lunch and dinner.  Since everyone needs to eat to survive, food will sell today and tomorrow.

How can you lose your money with food?  Preparing food that most people: will not like, cannot afford, or is inconvenient to purchase will likely do it.  Since these risks are generally within your control, the next step is to design a business that avoids these risks.

Grenville Phillips II is a Chartered Structural Engineer and President of Solutions Barbados.  He can be reached at NextParty246@gmail.com

113 responses to “The Grenville Phillips Column – Pay for Fun and Make Investments”


  1. invest in death……21 billion a year in states alone……6% increase in 2019…… cremations are 40% of the business but if investing in death makes you queasy invest in gas.

  2. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Grenville
    This advice is insufficient. In order to build a business that has significant growth potential you will need to more than simply follow the crowd and ask “are similar products selling well […]?” This approach is why there are so many people selling sweet bread and they all struggle to make ends meet.

    To build a business that has growth potential you need to solve a customer problem better than anyone else. This means that instead of looking to see what is selling well, you should look to find problems that are not being solved well.

    That is where the real opportunity lies. For example: don’t sell beans, because lots of people are selling beans and struggling with crop thefts by monkeys and other primates; find a way to solve that problem and you will build a MUCH more profitable business than any of the people selling beans.

    Innovation is the best way to build good businesses.


  3. @ PLT

    It is becoming boring the way you constantly attack Solutions and Grenville. There is nothing rational about your attacks, apart from an apparent inflated ego. If you want to discuss ideas with Grenville, go ahead. But to repeat differences of opinion and belief is boring. Say something new or stop it.

  4. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Hal
    Did you actually read what I wrote??


  5. Is it fair to surmise that Grenville has outlined a template of sorts to incent general public to start thinking in a particular way? Perhaps he will expand.


  6. @PLT

    I have read almost everything you have written since you launched your attack on Solutions. At first I thought you had a case, but over time you have become irrational and boring. If you do not agree with him, then walk away. Stop spouting your enormous ego. It is not nice.
    My problem with Grenville/Solutions, and I said it before May 24, was that he appears to be a one-man band. He should let his senior members speak. I said then, and still think now, his behaviour is authoritarian – but that is the Bajan style.


  7. Grenville is too simple as usual.

    And it seems that somebody needs a mirror …. and some new spectacles too!!

  8. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Hal
    Since you have read it you will recall that I started out as a spirited defender of Grenville and Solutions Barbados. I was corrected by arguments that I encountered in debate here on BU. Mind you, many of Grenville’s policies I continue to defend… it is basically the taxation policies and the censorship policies that make no sense to me. In fact you yourself commented just a week or two ago when I complimented Grenville on a piece that he wrote about international trade negotiation policy, I learned a lot from it. I will not walk away because I always hope to learn something of value.

    Yes I do have an enormous ego, it is one of my more grievous flaws— it may be almost as large as yours ;-). I will try harder to keep it in check.

  9. Georgie Porgie Avatar
    Georgie Porgie

    Innovation is the best way to build good businesses.

    SOUND DOCTRINE THAT CAN NOT BE REFUTED
    THATS HOW THE FAMOUS ENTREPENEURS GOT VERY VERY RICH

    RE If you have an extra $50 to spend, then you can take someone to the cinema to experience 3 hours of the Avengers: EndGame. If you had an extra $500 to spend, then you could have taken someone to experience about 3 hours of the Buju concert. With either option, you know that you are paying for fun.

    IF I HAD AN EXTRA 50$ I WOULD KEEP IT IN MY POCKET AND WAIT FOR THE LATEST GRENVILLE PHILIPS ARTICLE ON BU OR BT AND HAVE A GOOD LAUGH FOR FREE

    I WOULD ALSO THEN SEE HAL ASSTIN TRYING TO CONFOUND THE SOUND RESONING OF PLT- AMAN OF SUPERIOR INTELLECT……….HILARIOUS

    I STILL HAVE MY 50$ AND I HAD TWO GOOD LAFFS ALREADY THIS MORNING

  10. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    Why is there a Sandals on the international leisure/ tourism market. What is the vision that Butch Stewart possesses, that is so lucking amongst our own leisure/tourism players.
    Pizza, hot dogs and chicken/ buffalo wings are multi billion dollar industries.
    What makes Chefette compete with and leads Burger King and Kentucky locally.
    The difference is the ability to attract finance and to make your ideas seem worthwhile to to both customer and banker/investor.
    What made the Barbados Lumber Company, Ricks Supermarket , Jordan’s Supermarket successful.
    Against this background why did so many fail ?
    That is the question.
    I am suggesting it was mainly systematic undermining of many entrepreneurs and the inability to get funds. And of course the failure of the political class to design a policy of economic enfranchisement.


  11. Agree with Hal this PTL has placed himself very high on a pedestal
    To the point of boring and demonstrating to be a know it all
    For God sake this is a blog not a University where students must exhibit intelluctual abilty to pass a test
    In my mind you exhibit the crab in the barrell mentality persuaded by envy and jealousy towards Granville
    I read the article what i took away was a person having good intentions presenting goals and directions as a source for selfempowerment


  12. William Skinner….so true
    That is the question.
    I am suggesting it was mainly systematic undermining of many entrepreneurs and the inability to get funds. And of course the failure of the political class to design a policy of economic enfranchisement.

    My mind always reflect on those small village shops and question .what if these small entrepreneurs were given a financial helping hand to grow
    What the face of Barbados would look like present day

  13. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @William Skinner
    “… the failure of the political class to design a policy of economic enfranchisement.”
    +++++++++++++
    What would a policy of economic enfranchisement look like? Does the current government’s $5k trust loan policy qualify as a policy of economic enfranchisement?


  14. We live in an age where entrepreneurship must be defined by what supports national imperatives. In Barbados to our detriment we have focused on retail and distribution almost exclusively.

    Grenville there must be a new messaging. A prevailing ethos that must feed the spirit of our people to facilitate sustainable economic growth.


  15. David
    May 1, 2019 10:11 AM

    We live in an age where entrepreneurship must be defined by what supports national imperatives(Quote)

    What does this mean?

    @William Skinner
    “… the failure of the political class to design a policy of economic enfranchisement.”
    +++++++++++++
    What would a policy of economic enfranchisement look like? Does the current government’s $5k trust loan policy qualify as a policy of economic enfranchisement?(Quot e)

    ?????? What economic wisdom.

  16. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ PLT

    You asked what a policy of economic enfranchisement would look like.

    Kindly calculate all the earnings from the major industry over the last fifty years. Was there any attempt to regulate ancillary services toward small businesses?
    Here is an example:
    Small entrepreneurs started to sell clothing on the beach. The hotels then started opening boutiques.
    Small entrepreneurs started selling craft on the beach. The hoteliers put souvenir shops on their premises.
    Rental of mini mokes etc : all systematically taken away from small entrepreneurs.
    Here is a billion dollar industry that could have been a model developing a structured and properly regulated system of developing entrepreneurs and growing million dollar businesses.
    Imagine that concept wit other industries and the vision emerges.


  17. @ William

    Of course you are right. A simple explanation: a post office balanced sheet bank, funding small businesses, would enfranchise many of those small self-employed people and, most important, liberate them from the foreign owned banks.
    Bds$50m of the $1000m foreign reserves to fund turning the 18 post offices in to banks would be the most exciting thing we have done since Nov 30, 1966.

  18. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ Hal
    We could have easily turned literally abandoned sugar estates into Agro producing businesses and earning by now millions in forex.
    Again such ventures could have been regulated to lift the children the economic fortunes of the grand children and great grand children of those whose blood sweat and tears built the country.
    Where there is no vision the intellectual class asks how it can be done.
    All of these issues were a part of the black nationalist movement that the great hero, Errol Barrow, ostracized, going back to the 60s.


  19. @ William

    It is vison, by both parties. It is also a professional class that feels threatened by anyone who wants to break the salaried ranks and be an entrepreneur. It is part of our failure as a state.

  20. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    Every economic venture is exposed to a certain degree of risk, however that doesn’t negate going forward with the project, especially if you are getting a decent rate of return.

    Farming, especially crop production, is a very risky business. At the same time, with proper production planning and timing, the reward can be astounding even after factoring potential losses due to the two-legged pest.

  21. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @William Skinner
    Thanks for your explanation. So you would pass laws to prevent established businesses from competing with small entrepreneurs to provide ancillary services. For example you would pass laws to prevent hotels from opening boutiques or souvenir shops in order to stop them from driving beach vendors out of business.

  22. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    We are a nation of traders and paper pushers. A nation built on laziness, zero innovation and creativity. Nobody farms or wants to farm anymore. We make nothing. Therefore we play no part whatsoever in the global supply chain ecosystem.

  23. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ PLT

    Governments can regulate businesses. In some countries, the government/ state has certain regulations in place.
    Example
    If a government contract is given to a large company , a certain percentage of the contract must be given to minority businesses.
    In our case. A hotelier can be told that government policy prohibits including boutiques and craft shops inside of hotels. The reason being to protect and develop the small entrepreneurs on the beach.

    2. Large tour operators can be permitted to have no more than x amount of coaches and cannot also own taxis and PSVs

    A progressive policy seeks is to grow a national corporate conscience. As you move up , you are expected to make room and opportunity for those entering. In that way you create a level playing field over a period of time. It is called socio economic engineering.
    You will note that we are now on our knees begging the IMF. Can you seriously tell me that a consortium of corporate citizens could not lend the government a measly $100 million US or $200 million BDS. ?
    Lest have a real debate about economic enfranchisement without the pseudo intellectual red herrings.
    I am not talking about robbing Peter to pay Paul. I am talking about giving Paul a fair shot and true piece of the economic pie.


  24. @ William,

    Making the pie bigger. It is not rocket science.

  25. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @ William Skinner
    I am not disagreeing with you, just seeking to understand. I find the your strategy particularly interesting given that in the 19th century the Barbados parliament enacted laws to disadvantage Black market women so that their business would not compete too much with the White Bridgetown merchants. Turnabout seems to me fair play.


  26. @fortyacresandamule

    So true.

    There is the product risk then there is the risk averse nature of our people to consider.

  27. Freedom Crier Avatar

    Two Broad and Different Political Approaches of Wealth Creation…

    Choose the Most Productive Barbados…The Way of the Free Market by Encouraging and Unleashing Individual Entrepreneurs to Build Wealth, with less Restraints and Regulations that Stifle Innovation.

    Choose Freedom Not Stateism

    Since the Thatcher era, unfortunately, the variations between Free Enterprise and Statism she spoke of have become replaced by polarization; to the detriment of democracy.

    The moral aspect is this… Socialism is criminal behaviour because it uses force to take from people who produce wealth and give it to the elite rulers who live High on the Hog and who share that stolen wealth with a mob that supports the theft. The sad part is how few people see this fact. They just keep trying to steal from those who produce and give to the lazy (usually themselves.) and cannot figure out why they are failing.

    Margaret Thatcher summed it up absolutely perfectly. Now here we are some decades later saying the same thing about the US. Oppressors do not like Individuality or Freedom. They like Control and that Includes Control Over People.

    ENGLAND AND ITS ENTIRE PEOPLE PROSPERED UNDER PRIME MINISTER THATCHER.

    England is no longer a Free Society as what Thatcher spoke about as Embracing Free market Principles as to Stateism which they Now have with Socialism/Islamism at its core…That is what is causing the Peril in Britain …It is a Socialist Society becoming even more so with the Erosion of Freedoms that they used to take as Normal…The Country that gave the world the Magna Carta is now Banning Free Speech.

    MUST SEE: Margaret Thatcher Expertly Explains The Failure Of Socialism & Redistribution Of Wealth!

    https://www.facebook.com/turningpointusa/videos/1694380257277350/


  28. ENGLAND AND ITS ENTIRE PEOPLE PROSPERED UNDER PRIME MINISTER THATCHER.(Quote)

    Evidence, plse.

  29. Freedom Crier Avatar

    Hal Austin May 1, 2019 12:23 PM

    “ENGLAND AND ITS ENTIRE PEOPLE PROSPERED UNDER PRIME MINISTER THATCHER.(Quote)

    Evidence, plse.”

    Look It Up Hal…

  30. Freedom Crier Avatar

    Everyone that has Acquired Means did not have something unless he Inherited it and they aren’t that many people in Barbados who inherited wealth.

    A man that has no means cannot hire another person…a man of no means cannot build a building or fund a project. All the people of means that have been mentioned several times in a Derogatory manner on BU such as COW have started from the Bottom. COW story is well known when he got his Break with Barrow in helping to construct the Deep Water Harbour.

    These Individuals presently employ hundreds of people at various levels of management even down to the Labourer.

    Those who Envy others of their Wealth Creation should remember that…

    “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” – Winston Churchill

    https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840×2160/3027341-Marcus-Buckingham-Quote-Talent-is-the-multiplier-The-more-energy.jpg


  31. ENGLAND AND ITS ENTIRE PEOPLE PROSPERED UNDER PRIME MINISTER THATCHER.(Quote)

    Evidence, plse.”

    Look It Up Hal…(Quote)

    Where?

  32. Freedom Crier Avatar

    SOMETHING WORTHWHILE TO CONSIDER

    In a Free Market, businesses Can and should Choose whatever they want for goods and services.

    Businesses DESERVE fair compensation for the widgets they produce. If prices get too high, consumers will choose alternative products at prices the consumer deems reasonable. It’s called economic efficiency.

    The idea that redistribution is somehow appropriate is weak minded and implies oppression or lack of fairness. Too my knowledge, no entity, certainly no government, has proven effective at redistribution of resources.

    If People were not all subject to Heavy Taxation’s they as well as businesses will involve themselves in Charity and more Philanthropy, a few may not but that is their choice. A man spends a lot of his life accumulating wealth through his Hard work, Diligence, Sacrifice, Know How Etc. And when we notice that he is wealthy, he is usually an old man, and after he has acquired his wealth people want to take it from him (as in he has too much.) Most of these Rich people will die and leave their wealth it is not taken with them and it is left for their decedents with no guarantee that it will remain in their hands for they may spend it.. People who want to take away a man’s wealth after he has accumulated it, then what is the incentive to accumulate wealth if people will take it?

    You may as well choose to be one of the takers than one of the workers and if you take what is not yours what are you called?

    https://i.imgflip.com/pae44.jpg

  33. Freedom Crier Avatar
    Freedom Crier

    Hal Austin May 1, 2019 12:51 PM

    “ENGLAND AND ITS ENTIRE PEOPLE PROSPERED UNDER PRIME MINISTER THATCHER.(Quote)

    Evidence, plse.”

    Look It Up Hal…(Quote)

    Where?”

    HAL you have been asking question all your life you mean to tell me you cannot ask a question on the same browser you use to access BU?

    JUST like everything, you have to learn to Search for Truth and it may not be the first story you come across.

    SEEK & YE SHALL FIND.

    https://www.lorensworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Take-a-walk-4.png

  34. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    @Freedom crier.Capitalism is a philosophy of greed, an economic model steeped in corruption and shadiness. Its inherent nature is prosperity for the few. Show me a wealthy man and I will show you a honest man, is a very true saying.

    When capitalism fails, like the recent financial crisis, it always rely on government socialism to bail them out. Yep, privatise the profit, but socialise the loss, is another tenet of their philosophy.

  35. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”
    –Matthew 19:24

  36. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @WS
    you have a reasonably vivid imagination……”A hotelier can be told that government policy prohibits including boutiques and craft shops inside of hotels”

    Are you aware that many Hotels do not own nor operate most of these shops? They own the space, and lease it out to independent entities who then operate the businesses. Many of these entities classify under SMALL businesses. And even then, a big operator, like a Cave Shepherd, opens a store ‘nearby’ against which they must all compete. Or somebody builds a mall with several competitors.
    While most hotels in Barbados still operate the onsite restaurants, the growing trend elsewhere has been to subcontract this to a professional restaurant operator.

    “Can you seriously tell me that a consortium of corporate citizens could not lend the government a measly $100 million US or $200 million BDS. ?”

    Certainly. They are an AWFUL credit risk, and the creditors have ZERO control over how the borrower operates, and is at the whim of whomever the electorate decides to elect to manage. Plus sovereign loans come ‘sans collateral’. And God forbid a loan is called. Can you imagine a group of corporate citizens demanding (under the loan terms) access to the books?? Murdah…all hell would let loose. The political spin would exceed 6000RPM. Let de people cuss the IMF !! Not the ‘corporate citizens’.


  37. Hi David:

    This is the first of a 2-part series on investing. This first article shows people how to avoid the great wastage of money on failed investments. As people are sent home and try to survive, they will want to invest their severance or savings in a new business. Access to a fixed amount of money is the worst thing that anyone can have when starting a new business – they will likely lost it all.

    I hear many stories of people who lost so much in their business investments. The trust-loan scheme is a good idea (actually a published Solutions Barbados idea), but our implementation plan was completely ignored, so the money will likely be wasted.

    The second part will address significantly reducing the risks of losing your investment while investing in good ideas. It is actual economic enfranchisement.


  38. @Grenville

    Look forward to it. Continue to contribute to making Barbados a better place.

  39. Freedom Crier Avatar
    Freedom Crier

    @ fortyacresandamule May 1, 2019 1:55 PM

    To Reiterate Once More…“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” – Winston Churchill

    Socialism Feeds On Capitalism…It is a Parasite and because it feeds on Capitalism people Game the System and Create Crony Capitalism where Governments Create Winners & losers! Such as Granting Duty Free Concessions to Big Businesses while not allowing the same for Small Business an opportunity to Grow, such as the Chicken Industry with 200% on Poultry so the common man ends up paying three times the cost of imported Poultry…that is your Social Programs at work for you. You want more Examples?

    The Government are the only ones that can import Chicken and they imported Chicken wings INITIALLY to help the poor man or Small Businesses. A small businesses person could go to the BMC, purchase these wings, to be able to sell them reasonably or have WING SPECIALS to be able to generate business. Therefore, a small businessperson could go and buy say ten cases for a week. NOW THAT HAS BEEN STOPPED…THE POWERS THAT BE ARE NOW ONLY ALLOWING SMALL BUSINESS PEOPLE OR THE REGULAR JOE TO BUY ONE CASE OF WINGS…HOWEVER THE BMC ARE NOW SELLING THE POOR MAN CHICKEN WINGS ONLY TO BIG BUSINESSES THAT CAN PURCHASE 40 -100 CASES OR MORE.

    The story does not end there the Local Chicken suppliers have come together with other suppliers through the region and made a pack that they will not sell chicken to each other’s Caribbean countries…

    Barbadians could have purchased chicken at about half the price from, Guyana, Jamaica and Trinidad for example…

    GO FIGURE I HAVE ALREADY UNDERSTOOD THE SYSTEM OF CRONYISM NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.

    Cronyism is where big business and governments collude to give special favours to those entities to the exclusion of the ordinary person. Crony Capitalism is an attempt to label the System of Free Enterprise by regulating it until it is no longer Free.

    We can all make a difference in making Barbados Great, starting with the importance of Individual Responsibility and using our God Given Talents and Abilities to Improve Our Lot!

    Free Enterprise (Capitalism) leads to Prosperity and Freedom while Socialism leads to Poverty and Bondage! Capitalism does not come with a warranty or “money back” guarantee. Yet, it encourages individuality, creativity, opportunity, risk taking, ambition, pride, dignity, and a sense of accomplishment, promotion, and provision. Nonetheless, the lazy, stagnant, and ambitious are rewarded fairly and equitably. As much as Socialist professes their disdain for capitalism, they have yet to offer a better system. The reason is simple; it doesn’t exist”.

    Economic Entrepreneurs are a Boon to Society; Political Entrepreneurs are Another Animal Entirely!

    To answer your point of what caused the financial crisis was Government interference enforcing banks to lend for housing when the people had no ability to repay… that was instituted by the Socialist leaning Democrat party that started in the Clinton era…look it up before making accusations.

    https://blog.studocu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/entrepreneur-quote-1-picture-quote-1.jpg


  40. Investment is a serious matter and in every developed economy independent financial advisers are regulated. I know sometimes we feel we are experts at every.
    Having said that, for a very long time one blogger repeatedly claimed that I said I was an independent financial adviser; despite repeated corrections, he continued to repeat it even though I pointed out that in the UK it is a criminal offence to clam to be an independent financial adviser if not regulated. Be careful.

    @Freedom Crier,

    I ask questions when I am not sure and seek clarification. The alternative is to jump to conclusions.

  41. peterlawrencethompson Avatar
    peterlawrencethompson

    @Grenville
    I’m looking forward to the second part of this series on investing. I did notice that the BLP plagiarised your trust loan idea without attribution. I have had discussions with Minister Sutherland and offered help to improve the implementation, but we did not see eye to eye. I fear that we are simply creating a large cadre of persons who are $5k further in debt.

  42. Freedom Crier Avatar
    Freedom Crier

    peterlawrencethompson May 1, 2019 2:40 PM

    RE…“And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”
    –Matthew 19:24

    PLT, are you Rich or Poor and what do you want to be? BTW, do you know what that Scripture means?

    The Eye of the Needle was a gate in Jerusalem and a Rich man’s Camel that was Laden could not pass through it…it had to be UN-Laden. Signifying that a Rich man must also Humble himself to enter Jerusalem.

    The Lesson being taught was about Humility. However, as usual, the people who do not know about the scriptures want to use it to create their own Narrative and I learnt this since I was fourteen…How old is your Maturity again?

    “We have a growing population that wishes to have fun and be looked after, socialism works for them”…

    peterlawrencethompson May 1, 2019 9:04 AM

    @Hal…
    Yes I do have an enormous ego, it is one of my more grievous flaws …I will try harder to keep it in check.

    We look forward to that PLT.

    “needle gate” in the Old City of Jerusalem


  43. I have made a submission on investing which has gone for moderation. Why?

  44. WARU, Crazy & Unstable, Hogging the Blog Avatar
    WARU, Crazy & Unstable, Hogging the Blog

    Lawson..where u been?


  45. Here it is again.


  46. @SB
    I am looking forward to your second contribution.

    . I thought this was a very good start.

    This is something the average fellow would look forward to; so keep it practical and do not be driven to or attempt to deliver a one-size-fits-all recommendation.


  47. I think Lawson was in Barbados and got scared that Bajan technology might unmask him.

  48. WARU, Crazy & Unstable, Hogging the Blog Avatar
    WARU, Crazy & Unstable, Hogging the Blog

    “I find the your strategy particularly interesting given that in the 19th century the Barbados parliament enacted laws to disadvantage Black market women so that their business would not compete too much with the White Bridgetown merchants.”

    Make sure to emphasize that it Barbados’ BLACK PARLIAMENT over the decades.. enacted racist, apartheid, discriminatory legislation to prevent black women from feeding their families, preventing black families from having businesses to pass on from generation to generation..

    ……the successive house negros from each generation that entered parliament and the bar association did that and are still doing it today…no matter what the LIARS SAY.

    After decades of the same repulsive practices against the majority black population…Barbados is now an extremely repulsive and vile racist country…just as the corrupt black leaders always wanted it to be..

  49. fortyacresandamule Avatar
    fortyacresandamule

    @David. The risk averse nature of our people is a big problem. We must think and act BIG. Road -side -shack entrepreneurships will not build generational wealth. Rhiana, with her kind of wealth, should by now making major moves in the country. Does she own or involved in any major investment project here?

    Butch Stewart didn’t born in wealth, yet he was able to build Sandals into a regional brand. How? because was a great risk taker.

  50. William Skinner Avatar
    William Skinner

    @ PLT

    Not surprised ideas are being stolen from Solutions. The BLPDLP has been out of ideas for forty years. The 1991, NDP’s Manifesto called for more sixth forms. This was implemented by Jones and company during the DLP’s last term.
    Approximately twenty plus years later.
    The duopoly is barren. When last did you hear any real progressive policy ideas come from the buildings near Lionel C Hill Supermarket or St Cyprians Church?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading