The WILL has been the source of fierce discussion regarding the Estate of Marie Stewart. Here it is for review and to inform discussion about a matter the blogmaster takes the opportunity to reiterate needs to be resolved away from the glare of the public. However, precedent has shown oft-times that this will not be the case.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
@ Olivia Wellington aka George Walton Payne & Co
Spot Light–I repeat , you are an idiot!!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would rather be known as an idiot than to be known as someone who has robbed and stolen from my clients especially OLD LADIES.
You have no shame and the World is observing and watching closely.
The right of survivorship is an attribute of several types of joint ownership of property, most notably joint tenancy and tenancy in common. When jointly owned property includes a right of survivorship, the surviving owner automatically absorbs a dying owner’s share of the property.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If the Internet is to be believed, the estate of Ursuline Stewart has no interest in Weston or Cor-Villa.
Ursuline Stewart died before Marie Stewart and when she died she had not inherited an interest in property.
Does this mean her beneficiaries have no interest in her mother’s property?
Does the lack of the addition of “her heirs and assigns” in Marie Stewart’s will knock out her beneficiaries?
Once Ermine and Glenda were alive then they inherited and could do as they pleased with their property, including leaving it to their heirs and assigns.
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 8:10 PM
@ John, “She” was referring to the Executrix,
+++++++++++++++++++++
She being ….
So lets say all of her three daughters predeceased Marie Stewart.
Jackie and her siblings would get zero, no real or personal property!!
All of the land would be under the control of the estate with a court appointed executor!!!
That will cannot be right!!!
It means the possibility exists that the passing of land through the family could cease.
That will is not natural and is devoid of any humanity!!
Correct. My State of Connecticut has an Anti lapse provision by law which means that even if my Will lacked specificity, If any of my children predeceased me, their Estate inherits their portion.
One of the New York cousins is the Executrix and there are two other beneficiaries. They are not interested.
Unless my understanding of Marie Stewart’s character is wrong ….. that will is not hers!!
If only the ASSENT had been processed as Payne’s law firm was hired to do even before the Testarix fired him….and sonce she died and the executrix trusted him to do it…..
That is what will continue to haunt those Estate thieves…, that one will never go away.,
I am 90 % sure that it is her Will. I say 90% because she was torn and perhaps pressured. Ursuline returned home and I think that having her two daughters home compelled her to make provisions. She really relied on her Aunt for guidance and when that Aunt died, she was left as the last of that generation. Her Aunt would have walked into Mr. Payne’s office and most likely grabbed him by the collar and asked him what is going here and what provisions you are making. Remember George and Marie were cousins and most of the cousins were very intimidated by Marie’s Aunt.
@ John
Besides the illegal sale of the Land, they have fleeced if $1.5 million is remaining in the Bank leaving around $900.000 from the sale most of it filtered through the back door via stealing.
Glenda Harewood is the only surviving sister.
The other 2 sisters who are deceased have no husbands or children as surviving beneficiaries.
The lawyers are stating that Glenda only gets %50 of what is left in the Bank which would be around $750,000.
Beside the already $900,000 spent by the lawyers through real and concocted expenses now plus the other %50 which is $750,000 + $900,000 totalling $1 million 650 thousand to be stolen off the Estate by George Walton Payne & Co from the illegal sale.
Poor you Olivia Wellington and the 2 Jewish Lawyer Husbands having to fight day and night to cover up the Fraud and theft on Social Media for your criminal buddies.
I see why you are so cranky and lashing out with those who can see through the deception, you can’t even sleep properly at night now the Spotlight is on George Walton Payne & Co and its criminal Lawyers who are at the top of Barbados current Government.
It’s obvious Payne was waiting for the last living Beneficiary, who just happened to be the eldest sibling to die…but she stubbornly refused and left Payne up a creek..he can’t claim ownership of the Estate unless Jackie’s mother passes.
Idiot, Ermine did not die intestate.
She also did not have an ASSENT of ownership, as beneficiary, before she died, anyone can be an executor.
That is the mistake yall thieves make, ya robbed her, left her to die in filth, did not give her ownership to her own estate, so who drafted Ermine’s Will..I would love to see it…to understand why she ended up dying in poverty and in such inhumane condition…
yeah.. bring it on demon, bring it on..
@WARU, you are tonight’s winner of the Broken Record Award which entitles you to an all expenses paid weekend at the Hotel of Idiots.
Whoever left Ermine to die… is more than likely also in her Will….did Payne file an ASSENT for Ermine just after she died..the one he refused to file while she was alive.
cousins flew in and found her living inhumane conditions while George Payne and Marshall sat back and waited and watched patiently….
So she had no children…who is the beneficiary of her Will..
Better and idiot than a Skunk…none of you can answer who left the old lady to die while an untitled Estate of which she was a beneficiary..WAS RAPED..
Olivia Skunk, no one wants to hear your bullshit fairytales…people want to know why this lady died in that condition if the estate was being taken care of properly by Payne,,as her personal and legal representative///..all the dumb crap you are posting is not of importance..
Ya been posting a bunch of forged documents from Payne’s office to BU..post Ermine’s WILL..
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 8:38 PM
I am 90 % sure that it is her Will. I say 90% because she was torn and perhaps pressured.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This sounds plausible.
@WARU–A beneficiary can be anyone of one’s choosing.
Well she was chosen as a beneficiary to her mother’s Estate and also her surviving sister..with Payne administering the estate ..as attorney…..and that was not my question..you are not teaching me anything…the crap you are spouting is elementary….
..answer the hard questions..and show Emine’s WILL.
I have no clue who this passive/aggressive clown think they are speaking to…ya mission already failed..
The wall erected is higher than anything you can jump over, crawl under or walk around, you are just unable to see it..so you keep getting nowhere…
Ermine’s WILL..ah bet ya not one fella want anyone to see its contents.
@ Olivia Wellington
Correct. My State of Connecticut has an Anti lapse provision by law which means that even if my Will lacked specificity, If any of my children predeceased me, their Estate inherits their portion.
ANOTHER DAY AND YOU STILL ON BARBADOS UNDERGROUND TELLING LIES AND COVERING UP FOR YOUR CROOKED MATES
@ David where are people talking about this matter?
My mother and her brother were buddies from childhood.
When their eldest brother died in 1982 they started discussing wills as there was confusion over the will of my uncle who had died!!
For sure it was a concoction, but it was the “last will”!!
For example, it left land that wasn’t his to leave (title deeds conveniently lost) and made dispositions he could not make.
I know my mother had a will prior to 1982 but it was prepared by her brothers and father and given to her to sign!!!
I will bet her brother also had the same type of will drawn for him since the 1960’s!!
Her brother had a friend who was a lawyer so he went and got his will done … or redone ..… all legal and proper.
That I would say was his will made of his own accord.
Neither had access to vast sums of money.
Both intended all of their children to get everything equally so since my uncle had a properly prepared will in 1982, my mother, practical as ever, just copied it!!
She changed the names to fit her situation!!
Any reference to property she left out.
Two of her old time friends, a couple, came up a Friday night and witnessed her signature.
The husband was a company secretary and versed in things legal … but he was not a lawyer as far as I know.
Her brother had a new will written for him in 1997, all properly witnessed and prepared by the legal office where his son worked.
Surprise, surprise, the new will left out one of his children!!
His children were definitely weird!!
By that time he was getting on (~80) and not as powerful as he was so he did as he was told!!
He was well taken care of and died peacefully in a home.
I know how it works!!
It is his will but it is not really his will … wink wink!!
So you are saying it is her will but not really her will … wink wink!!
@ Olivia
Something peculiar is going on here you are not named as a beneficiary and stand to gain financially money wise based on the Will or any Documents you have shared with Barbados Underground.
You are however behaving as someone who is VERY deeply involved who has been fighting to sway everyone.
Nobody had quarreled or defamed Olivia Wellington before you started sharing Questionable Legal Documents on Barbados Underground.
Why?
Some are following the matter but it has not taken on a viral status.
The real key to this elaborate land fraud of which Olivia Skunk is party…lies in Ermine’s Will.
@Overseas Observer, You are correct in that I have nothing to gain financially. However, there is such a thing as credibility, honesty and fairness. I have heard the sentiments shared about some elected officials and lawyers, many are quite vitriolic. I believe that it is our responsibility to challenge that which is unjust and dishonest.
When the public rallies behind you, you have a responsibility to be forthcoming and to give a true accounting of what has taken place. Jackie has not done so and her credibility can be demolished with solid evidence and her own incriminating comments that the world has now seen. When she loses credibility there is a domino effect and her supporters are in turn diminished and some might even become disillusioned if they are truly in search of justice.
Jackie is not out for justice, I assure you–hers is a personal quest.
Olivia
@Overseas Observer, You are correct in that I have nothing to gain financially. However, there is such a thing as credibility, honesty and fairness. I have heard the sentiments shared about some elected officials and lawyers, many are quite vitriolic. I believe that it is our responsibility to challenge that which is unjust and dishonest.
When the public rallies behind you, you have a responsibility to be forthcoming and to give a true accounting of what has taken place. Jackie has not done so and her credibility can be demolished with solid evidence and her own incriminating comments that the world has now seen. When she loses credibility there is a domino effect and her supporters are in turn diminished and some might even become disillusioned if they are truly in search of justice.
Jackie is not out for justice, I assure you–hers is a personal quest.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I posed a question, my belief is that all you have spilled ABOVE the finger is pointed back at you not Jackie Stewart.
I believe like most commenters you are being very dishonest and have been caught out many times.
Olivia
Overseas Observer, You are correct in that I have nothing to gain financially. However, there is such a thing as credibility, honesty and fairness. I have heard the sentiments shared about some elected officials and lawyers, many are quite vitriolic. I believe that it is our responsibility to challenge that which is unjust and dishonest.
When the public rallies behind you, you have a responsibility to be forthcoming and to give a true accounting of what has taken place. Jackie has not done so and her credibility can be demolished with solid evidence and her own incriminating comments that the world has now seen. When she loses credibility there is a domino effect and her supporters are in turn diminished and some might even become disillusioned if they are truly in search of justice.
Jackie is not out for justice, I assure you–hers is a personal quest.
I simply posed a question, my observations from reading all the comments and feedback on the Blogs is all the things that you are saying Above the finger is pointing back at you not Jackie Stewart.
I find you to be untrustworthy and very dishonest.
An anti-lapse statute is a rule of construction in trusts and estates law. If a testator devises a gift to a person in his will and the devisee predeceases the testator, the anti-lapse statute will allow the gift to pass on to the devisee’s descendants rather than force the gift to pass through intestacy.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I did not see Clarke Gittens and Farmer deal with this so I presume either they don’t know about it or it isn’t in our laws!!
Lets suppose Ursuline had children.
As it stands it looks like Marie Stewart’s gift to her of a 1/3 share in her real and personal property would not get to them.
Ursuline predeceased her mother so her mother’s gift to her could not pass to her estate.
But Ursuline had no children … neither did Ermine.
Lets say the will is perfectly bonafide.
It could suggest that Ermine was expected by her mother to pass her share on to Glenda and Glenda to pass on to her children.
But Ermine was free to do as she wanted.
@Overseas Observer–that is your prerogative
Ermine inherited her share and was free to do with it as she pleased. Prior to August 2016, her Will bequeathed all of her Estate to her Sister and her children. Because of the anger and hostility, she re-wrote her Will excluding some.
@John–Anti-lapse is making its way into most statutes but it is not written into the Barbados Estate statutes.
Since we are all liars and thieves, I have requested copies of all emails and transcripts of communication on this matter sent to Jackie in 2016 by one of our New York cousins. I will have them sent to the Blogmaster and he can determine whose veracity prevails.
@ Olivia
Since we are all liars and thieves, I have requested copies of all emails and transcripts of communication on this matter sent to Jackie in 2016 by one of our New York cousins. I will have them sent to the Blogmaster and he can determine whose veracity prevails.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I thought you were making representations SOLELY on your own behalf; now you are admitting a “we”.
Above Freudian slip of the tongue who is the we you are representing?
The BU Blogmaster would need to FULLY publish those emails with FULL HEADERS including all Email Addresses and Names, date, time etc.
OLIVIA SKUNK IF THAT WILL WAS WRITTEN FROM GEORGE WALTON PAYNE IT WILL NEVER STAND AS WE ALL KNOW HE NEVER EVEN GOT ONE ASSENT DRAFTED AND THAT OFFICE IS FULL OF CROOKS OR ARE YOU IGNORING ME TOO WHO NAMES AND SHAMES TEM ALSO NEVER WOULD A JUDGE TAKE A DOCUMENT FROM THAT OFFICE AS CREDIBLE .THIS FRAUD STARTED WHEN THE MOTHER WAS ALIVE SOLIVIA SKUNK PISS SOME WHERE ELSE
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 11:11 PM
Ermine inherited her share and was free to do with it as she pleased. Prior to August 2016, her Will bequeathed all of her Estate to her Sister and her children. Because of the anger and hostility, she re-wrote her Will excluding some.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Figured there was a change in will!!
In many families a will is a simple instrument.
Very often intestacy achieves the same result … and saves a lot of $$ and aggro!!
OLIVIA SKUNK AGAIN HATE JACKIE STEWART EMAILS ARE NOT OF IMPORTANCE .SHOW US THE ASSENTS THAT ERMNE SENT HER SISTER THIS IS NOT ON JACKIE STEWART DID NOT STEAL FROM THE ESTATE
OLIVIA SKUNK IT IS ERMINE WHO FAILED HER SISTER NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND THAT IS OBVIO
US TO A BLIND MAN WHERE IS THE MONEY FROM THE SALE OF ORANGE HILL AS I LISTEN TO THE VDEOS ALSO MELVIN ATWELL SOLD IT STILL NO DEEDS SKUNK PISS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION
Olivia Wellington
September 11, 2018 11:11 PM
Ermine inherited her share and was free to do with it as she pleased. Prior to August 2016, her Will bequeathed all of her Estate to her Sister and her children. Because of the anger and hostility, she re-wrote her Will excluding some.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 2nd January 2016 Ermine made an agreement with CGP Ventures Inc to sell Weston.
On 6th September 2016 (affidavit) Ermine informed Glenda that she was planning to sell Weston.
On 16th September 2016, GWP wrote Davida Maynard informing that Weston had been sold.
If Ermine’s Will prior to August 2016 contained an itemization of land and highlighted the promise by her father to Glenda, then the will would have needed to be changed, just like Marie Stewart’s will needed to have been changed when Ursuline Died.
We are back to square one, indebtedness of the Estate of Marie Stewart and whether or not Glenda should have been informed since before 2nd January 2016 that the land was on the market.
If Ermine changed her will after August 2016 it would have been to reflect the sale of Weston.
If she also cut Glenda out and say left the property to one or more of her children other than Jackie …. it would be difficult for me to avoid a conclusion that it was a deliberate attempt to divide Glenda’s family and cloud the matter.
“Figured there was a change in will!!”
More than likely an elaborate forgery of a new Will for Ermine without her knowledge, given her deliberately destroyed and diminished mental capacity…
PAIN and TEETS are a nasty bunch and when they have Olivia Skunk and those breed of lowlife to help them perpetrate fraud, they think they got it all covered….AND everyone else fooled…
Going round in circles with Payne co- conspirators is a waste of time
By 2016 Ermine would have been in no condition physically or mentally to be signing anymore documents ……. PARTICULARLY a Will…not in the environment of filth she was maliciously left by PAIN and TEETS to marinate in….not for the number of years PAIN and TEETS were dragging her around in waiting mode while THEY waited for her die…at her age the stress to her mental and physical structure THEY piled on would have done irreversible damage both mentally and physically……the last 2 years of her life she would have been totally nonfunctional…while she waited and waited for them to title the Estate?..
Watch out for Ermine’s Will to be a complete forgery and fabrication to keep the fraud perpetrated on the Stewart Estate center stage.
Where is Cynthia Fprde to investigate this clear methodical abuse of the elderly senior citizen Ermine…in order for PAIN and TEETS to successfully rip off the Stewart Estate.
If ever there was a case made for criminal elder abuse…it is what Payne and Marshall did to Ermine.
the last 2 years of her life she would have been totally nonfunctional…while she waited and waited for PAIN and TEETS to title the Estate…this is not a question…it is fact, Ermine had become so numb to her living condition of filth…it no longer bothered her..that is not the actions of someone with a sound mind..
So post Ermine’s Will…Olivia Skunk, ya posted many forged documents….posting a forged Will cannot make any great difference now.
I am one of the people Olivia Skunk cannot embrace and dance me around no damn mulberry bush..
To think Olivia Skunk threatened and promised to post every document belonging to the Stewart Estate to the Blog….but we don’t need too see every document..we only need to see one document, the most important one..Ermine’s Last Will and Testament…
….that is the only relevant document now yall opened ya self created can of MAGGOTS like yaselves..
Olivia Skunk why do you persist in revealing documents from other family members. Personal and private information is not warranted. You are as low and trifling as one can get. Clearly there is a jealousy for Jackie. Why don’t you reveal Ermine Will. Keep embracing your mates teet and pain with this farce. You are truly as low as any human being can stoop.
There is no need to revile and belittle anyone.
Just focus on the facts.
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.