Banner promoting anonymous crime reporting with a phone and contact number 1 800 TIPS (8477), featuring the Crime Stoppers logo and a QR code for submitting tips.

← Back

Your message to the BLOGMASTER was sent

It is the time of the year Barbadians and the other islands in the region prepare for the hurricane season. Last weekend the country was placed on Hurricane Watch with the passing of Beryl across the region. We breathed a collective sigh of relief at Beryl’s uneventful passing,  however, there is anxiety brewing among others who are aware the IMF team visiting Barbados continue to conduct interviews with key actors in Barbados to inform talks about the type of IMF program we will have to enter to apply a tourniquet  to a hemorrhaging economy.

As the blogmaster moves around Barbados there is the query whether Barbadians are aware of the perilous state the economy is functioning. It seems there is a perception in some quarters that having rejected the failed policies of the former Democratic Labour Party (DLP)  of which the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) was the beneficiary by default on 24 May 2018 – unfortunately the third parties were unable to gain traction for reasons ventilated in this forum – the BLP as if by magic will be able to top up the foreign reserves from the crisis level it hovers, eliminate the need to operate the current account in deficit and by extension pay down the high level of debt. The blogmaster suspects the skills of Director of Communications Charles Jong will be required soon to assuage the fears of Barbadians when IMF policy prescription is implemented.

There should be no doubt that given the state of the economy delicate decisions have to be taken to reduce the level of expenditure by the government and at the same time allocate spend to target areas of potential growth while protecting the vulnerable. It will call for tip toe precision in decision making. Clearly the time has come to put Barbados first as a country and park the frivolous political snarking. Whether we like it or not the Barbados brand was besmirched in recent years by achieving junk credit rating status with the final puncture Barbadians having to join a world audience to witness raw sewage gushing on a street located in our tourist resort area of the South Coast.

The blogmaster anticipates institutional investors holding government paper will be asked to make a sacrifice to the national cause to rescue and rebuild (BLP’s election tag line). The delayed rationalization of several state owned entities will be implemented. The last government allowed political considerations to stall this initiative when clearly transfers and subsidies as an expense item had to be urgently addressed.

One other item which should be addressed is the rising pension expense of government. The blogmaster recognizes this is an area that requires a high level of expertise to sensibly tackle and will defer to the IMF team et al to address with the local parties concern responsible. Where is Walter when we need him? Not Maloney!

The blogmaster will not forgive the former Governor of the Central Bank for allowing the commercial banks to twist his arm by deregulating the minimum savings rate as a quid pro quo arrangement for dumping government savings bonds on a financially illiterate public hungry for a reasonable rate of return on investment.  Daily we hear the ignorance being perpetuated for Barbadians to invest in Carilend, or deposit money with the credit unions. A simple question to clarify. If tomorrow 50% of deposits held with banks was transferred to the credit union balance sheet what will be the impact? Will their interest expense line item go up or down if they maintain current level of interest paid to members? Are credit unions able to lend for big ticket items like a mortgage to compare with other financial institutions? How does Carilend work? Who regulates Carilend? And no the blogmaster has no beef with Carilend or credit unions.

A fool and their money are soon parted.

Wild Coot has been a voice crying in the wilderness or so it seems.

 


Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

207 responses to “IMF Watch”


  1. A few points to consider:

    You state and I note that” given the state of the economy delicate steps have to be taken to reduce the level of expenditure”

    I am curious as to why you haven’t suggested (as done in the past) areas of obvious cutting e.g. the extremely large cabinet made up of people with no particular skills but placed there purely as a political downpayment to be drawn upon when the time calls for it.I can go further and point to other political consultants like,Dame Billie – no particular portfolio- Charles Jong – an unknown nonnational reputed to be skilled in managing Mia’s facebook page etc,Avinash Persaud- who even his alleged proffership is questionable and has no track record of success in anything,Clyde mascoll,Jessica Odle,Pat parris and on and on.

    When are we going to get blunt and speak truth to power to this new administration?

    If the economic situation is as serious as is stated (and I think it is serious as was known for the past couple of years),why didn’t Ms Mottley demonstrate this by being present and involved during the FIRST IMF’s visit.Since optics was one of the things some persons spoke out against the last set and the head not being present and seen to be in charge- do you think it was more important to be bigging up yuhself at the CARICOM Heads of Govt meeting – which is known to be a virtual ‘talk-shop’.

    Which is more important the IMF visit or the applause at the CARICOM meeting?

    What did we achieve? St lucia said no to CCJ,Jamaica said – the people must decide but we don’t know when but bdos was like Santa Claus giving away all the goodies.

    As to the bajans’ awareness of the hardship soon to be visited upon them by the IMF measures -well that was not the song the BLP was singing during the campaign.We were told to give her (Mia) the vote ans ‘watch muh’.

    I spoke to an old pensioner last night and it is clear that poor ole soul (and many more like him) is going to drop through the hole.

  2. bajanfreeparty Avatar
    bajanfreeparty

    You can not run a Nation with Massive Land Fraud and PONZI, Banks are no longer fooled by Ministers/ Lawyers of Barbados, Historians and fake whitewashed information made up to hide the truth of Barbados land records, Economist are liars that talk short to gain facebook likes, As they walk the street of Barbados pimping lies to tourist,Banks need “Clear Title ” Land going back to 1913 to bypass the lies of” ‘good title”FRAUD, MADE UP BY LAWERS,


  3. The size of the Cabinet and supporting cast is mainly a political issue, one of optics, we are discussing a million plus more in remuneration compared to the DLP? This is only a good guesstimate by the blogmaster. The cut in transfers and subsidies and other expenditure items will call for hundreds of millions in cuts. It is the same argument the BLP will use for the 7 million spent on the 50th anniversary. We will have to judge the government by its output down the road. If they do not deliver it will come back to bite them.

    The government has a large finance team, the IMF team has been meeting with stakeholders, government department technocrats et al, they leave Barbados on the 12th, surely they would have shceduled adequate time to meet with the PM as an exit interview? You should give them credit, after all it is Mottley who called them in, met them in Barbados a couple weeks after the election, called and visited Lagarde in Washington etc.


  4. T INNISS
    Really need to take off his/her political glasses and come with correct facts and stop publishing misinformation !

    Thanks David for stating the correct facts.


  5. The size of the cabinet is merely a political issue BU ? So you were being political when in your past blogs you chided the DLP over their cabinet size of 17 and the use of consultant?

    The cost of all these appointments will be in the millions and we haven’t yet seen the appointments of the already announced ‘tsars’.

    Meeting with the private sector,Unions and central bank governor is one thing,but any serious prime minister who is more concerned about substance than public relations would want to be present on this first IMF visit.


  6. I agree with T. Inniss that this administration has too many ministers. It is too large with ministers performing half day jobs in half day ministries.

    However, how can he protest the appointment of Commisiong as Caricom Ambassador, when he agreed with the DEMS choice of Bobby Morris who was appointed under similar circumstances?

    I believe those of you who choose to oppose the government need to sit down, check and compile the relevant information before posting.

    You often present stupid arguments through which holes could be easily placed.


  7. The PM travelled to meet with Lagarde prior to the IMF’s team’s visit to Barbados.

    Do you know what transpired at that meeting?


  8. You really need to read with understanding. The BLP will be punished down the road if this is factored by the people as an incorrect decision based on a perceived overall performance. The truth is the DLP at this time has no credibility when it comes to commenting on issues of transparency, work ethic, economic performance and many other indicators. Barbados yet again finds itself in a bad place read at the mercy of one half of a duopoly. Have a read of John Goddard in Barbados Today, finding a way to give Stuart a pass. Freundel Stuart during his tenure has exposed a level of incompetence not experienced in Barbados.

  9. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ T.Inniss July 10, 2018 7:40 AM
    “The cost of all these appointments will be in the millions and we haven’t yet seen the appointments of the already announced ‘tsars’.

    True that!
    But you know what? The cost could be ‘deferred’ if PM MAM would keep her promise to the electorate and recoup some of the many millions looted from or denied to the Treasury over the past 9 years.

    From Greenverbs Parris millions due as back taxes on his laundered ‘gratuity’ payments to Hal Golloping et al inflated-invoices covering legal fees (for work any 3rd year student in Jeff Cumberbatch’s law class could have done as an assignment over a weekend) to the ‘corrupted’ cost overruns looted by the Baloney boy and the contract kickbacks crews.

    Why should poor hardworking Bajans be saddled with a $45.00 p/m levy on their water bills as a result of blatant corruption and incompetence when millions are due to the Treasury from these crooked tax dodgers?

    We too await MAM’s performance in this area in the same way you await the failure of her army of consultants and “tsars”.

    BTW, why aren’t you persecuting and prosecuting Comissiong and MAM for allowing the erection of the Hyatt hotel to go into a permanent state of financial detumescence by giving Visions a get-out-of-jail card? The poor boy Baloney can now drop his massive flaccid scam.

    The question that still remains and which you should be asking is: from where will the money to build the Hyatt be coming? Why would a country on the brink of forex starvation and in a wilderness of economic growth not want such an urgent injection of FDI to stimulate much needed economic activity?


  10. Mr. Blogmaster

    I cannot understand the rationale and reasoning government’s critics are using.

    While defending the former administration, the operatives told us that decisions were made collectively by Cabinet.

    However, they seem to want us to believe that Mottley is autonomous and making unilateral decisions, WITHOUT Cabinet’s involvement, then they are throwing out words such as dictator, despot, Hitler and Mugabe.

    It seems as though the game plan is to improvise and play out Owen Arthur’s “despot” and “megalomaniac” script.


  11. Enrico stop looking backward. The voters elected Mottley for Change
    The fact that she has not been willing to give the voters what they asked of her is boldfaced hypocrisy
    Belly aching about past govt decisions and aligning them to Mia mugabee decision is foolishness and would not be given a pass
    Leaders lead would be the rallying cry

  12. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ T.Inniss July 10, 2018 7:40 AM
    “Meeting with the private sector,Unions and central bank governor is one thing,but any serious prime minister who is more concerned about substance than public relations would want to be present on this first IMF visit.”

    No wonder your ex-PM Fumble readily became the laughing stock of the international financial community and in the Caricom HOGS circus.
    Was he ever a serious PM other than in his extensively long periods of gigantic sleep?

    After the IMF meeting MAM should do like Fumble and dump any report in the waste paper basket aka file 13.

    What sayest thou, Bro. Inniss?

    The IMF should really devalue the Bajan Mickey mouse dollar and then you would really see who is who in Bim by separating the parasitic incompetent DLP yard-fowls from the foreign exchange earning fast-breeding BLP chickens.


  13. Miller

    I don’t disagree that money should be recouped where it is found and proven to be misappropriated.However all I ask is – if you are really serious,then don’t start at 2008 – no sir go back to 2003 or even 1999 when this Blp was last in and the Auditor – general was dropping scandal after scandal.Let us name and shame everyone found guilty.

    Whenever the blp start speaking about scandals and the last DLP administration at least 4 names or at a stretch 5 names are being repeate.,Note the past leader Stuart has never been implicated in any of this name dropping However under the BLP – the past leader and this current one, as well as, almost all of the past BLP cabinet could have been indicted.So where are we going with this selective reasoning.

    Enrico Rossi – is unbridled BLP fowl poop – Lorenzo in another vesture.


  14. The comment about putting Barbados first comes to mind. There is a vacuum that needs to be filled ASAP because the DLP element lacks the credibility based on the general election result supported by the continuation of the old rhetoric.


  15. @ T. Inniss

    This is not the first IMF meeting it is the THIRD!!
    The PM was present at the first in Barbados and the traveled to Washington for the second.

    Other bloggers are giving the correct facts and you are still coming back with the same false information.


  16. Do we know when phase 2 of the government’s restore rebuild program will take place?

    Kudos must go to the government regarding its willingness to use the media to share info with the public. Certainly the government has done more in less than two months than the former government did in its full tenure. How many press conferences PL Stuart held? The party must accept we live in an Information Age. A look at enlightened jurisdictions now see MPs will communicating daily via Facebook, Twitter, instagram and other social media platforms.

    May it continue!

  17. Bernard Codrington Avatar
    Bernard Codrington

    @ David BU

    Should your caption not be Barbados Watch rather than IMF Watch?

    Should the public not be the recipient of the revised figures on the state of the Barbados economy? We should not be guessing how bad it is?

    A few blogs back I asked for a spread sheet of the outstanding national debts and their repayment schedules?
    Do you not think that the BU Household would be debating public debt in a vacuum if this basic information is unavailable?

    Let us have the facts . Reduce the speculation.

    Growth of the Barbados Economy, like the tide, will raise all boats . These boats will include the earning of foreign reserves,and closing the gap between public revenues and public expenditures. Where are the measures and strategies to do this?

    Second guessing what the IMF will do or say is a continuation of the” It is not my fault syndrome”. Do we really need more of this? The changing of the guards was supposed to be transformational.
    Let us get on with it.


  18. “Note the past leader Stuart has never been implicated in any of this name dropping However under the BLP – the past leader and this current one, as well as, almost all of the past BLP cabinet could have been indicted.”
    ++??+?+??++?+

    I see that T. Inniss is up to his old trick of manipulating the truth, but what the heck, such is expected from a yardfowl.

    Mr. Inniss, I’m sure that you’re familiar with the name Hal Gollop. And I’m sure you’re aware he is Freundel Stuart’s mate and “bag man.”

    Mr. Gollop charged $1.5M for legal services rendered to the BWA, including preparing a conveyance (which is not required for land owned by the crown)

    Do you really believe that people are so naive as to not believe that Stuart was unaware of this transaction as well as the many other financial irregularities highlighted by the Auditor General during his (Stuart’s) tenure as PM?

    The mere fact that he refused to admonish those ministers who engaged in questionable activities and conflict of interest issues, we can conclude he condoned them and he is equally as guilty.


  19. @Bernard

    We are all fixated on the IMF are we not?

    What is wrong with the speculation of the people if the objective of the government is to agree to an IMF program that is palatable? If there is anybody in the BU family willing to compile the numbers in the context you suggest BU will publish.

  20. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ T.Inniss July 10, 2018 9:36 AM
    “Note the past leader Stuart has never been implicated in any of this name dropping However under the BLP – the past leader and this current one, as well as, almost all of the past BLP cabinet could have been indicted.So where are we going with this selective reasoning.”

    Oh, what a laugh from a rollicking yarn of innocence and the virginal integrity of Lord King Fumble the doyen of Decency!

    Isn’t this a classic case of: “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Who will guard the guards?)

    A man is known by the company he keeps. So who were the ‘friends’ of the same Stuart?

    Wasn’t the “estimable” Greenverbs Parris- an expert in money laundering- a bosom pal of the dethroned and now exiled Lord King Fumble? Now in whose arms is the Leper Leroy sleeping these days?

    What about Hal G. and his gopher Michael Y. (both QCs- aka quacks and crooks)?
    In whose ‘chambers’ have these two discredited fellows resided if not those of many a mansion(s) built by the same fallen Humpty-Dumpty Stuart?


  21. Poor you Artax.That is how you trying to implicate stuart?Steupes.

    There was no first official IMF meeting with Mottley.As far as I can recall the person in charge of the team for Jamaica was leaving Jamaica and stopped in on his way back to Washington.

    That therefore was not a meeting to begin negotiations since Mia had not even gone with hands outstretched to meet the IMF in Washington.

    So all this propoganda about 2 meetings before is all hot air.The music now start – let the dancing begin.


  22. Im a bit nervous, if not scared to respond to the DLP apologists, or anything political for that matter…..

    …….lest TheoGazerts in his great wisdom and observation return me to yardfowl status along with Enuff.

    (He has this amazing ability to tell what colour sleeves you’re wearing, if you dare criticize a certain political party).


  23. Miller

    My post @ 9:36 a.m. to you remains.


  24. No, poor you Inniss.

    You need to come better than the political lollipops you’re offering.

    As PM, Stuart must accept and take responsibility for what occurred under his watch.


  25. Why are you making these silly comments?

    It was reported in the media that Mia Mottley made a call to Laguard about a couple weeks after she was elected and she dispatched the Jamaica IMF team to Barbados.

    Go and check the BGIS portal, the releases are there.

  26. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    The technological backwardness being displayed by those who will claim to be well educated and professional even scholarly is mindbogglingly frightening, no one needs to be physically present for meeting anywhere in the world anymore, prisoners do not even need to be physically present at their own trials…not with all the technology in existence to beam live, in real time.

    Why are taxpayers still wasting money to educate some people when it does not translate to critical thinking skills or commonsense.

  27. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    I agree the optics of the large Cabinet are very poor. It smacks of a leader fearful of defections if somebody doesn’t get a pick, and sends the wrong message when accompanied by an IMF request.

    I also agree with BC, time for the debt facts to be laid out, and cut the speculation. The huge void of reporting information, which got worse under the past administration, may not be available, but firm dates are needed for its filing, or this too will get lost in the shuffle.

    I am hopeful the IMF will set targets, and leave it up to Barbados how they achieve them. In the past, many politicians have preferred the IMF dictate harsh medicine, then they can say “it wasn’t me, the IMF gave us no choice”.

    While it was the Transfers and Subsidies category, which got totally out of control, and not Public Service wages, the latter were collectively still high. To grant a small increase, while possibly deserved, similarly sends the wrong message. Possibly the political thinking was, give the increase to show we care, and then let the IMF take care of changes? Which makes me fearful of my comments in the preceding paragraph.

  28. Bernard Codrington Avatar
    Bernard Codrington

    @ David BU at 10 :45 AM

    I do not think that we are all fixated on the IMF. It is a narrative that was crafted by political scaremongers and reinforced by the press. It is about time we throw away that psychological crutch and take full responsibility for our affairs. The IMF is there to assist or make things worse. But it is always Barbados’ call.
    My plead is for you to leave that choir. It is self defeating and counter – productive. The IMF is not as dogmatic as was projected. Events have proven that their trade mark prescriptions no longer work. As was mentioned by one of BU’S commentators Barbados and the World Economy is not that of the 1970s,1980’s. The World economy went through a structural change after 1998. Ask Hal the chronicler.


  29. What in the blog content perpetuates the IMF myth except a detailing of the debt? Your general point is taken.


  30. Northern Observer

    I agree with ALL of your of observations at 11:26 a.m.

    My hope is Bdos remains resilient and does not go under.


  31. Post the BGIS releases then and I will correct myself if the evidence demands it.

  32. Bernard Codrington Avatar
    Bernard Codrington

    @ David BU

    The global economy is on the cusp of another sea change. Reading the developments in the EU and the USA you may notice a change back to national protectionism. It is riding on the backs of populism of the right and the left. The symptoms are closing of borders against immigrants, high tariffs on foreign goods and repatriation of national corporations.

    You precursive algorithms are over correcting my scripts. No wonder contributors appear to be writing nonsense. Not your fault.


  33. @ T Inniss


  34. June 1, 2018
    Ms. Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, made following statement today:
    “As announced by Prime Minister Mottley earlier today, the Barbados economy has been going through significant challenges for some years. The authorities are developing an economic reform plan designed to address these challenges, and they have asked the international community and the International Monetary Fund to assist them as they put the economy back on a path to recovery. An IMF team led by Bert van Selm will be visiting Bridgetown to start discussions on how the Fund can support the authorities’ economic plan. Our ultimate goal is to help Barbados achieve higher living standards and more inclusive growth for the years ahead.”
    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS
    PRESS OFFICER: Randa Elnagar
    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org
    Please share
    Email
    WhatsApp

    Share

    in
    Share
    Print


  35. Haiti message to the IMF is one which in effect delivers a huge black eye and might have let some of the aire of political economic propaganda of “goodwill” which regulates a sytematic approach that small island nations must be treated with disdain and appreciate the hostile austerty measures


  36. Article by
    Barbados Today
    Published on
    June 3, 2018

    Bert van Selm is the man who will be leading an International Monetary Fund (IMF) delegation Bridgetown to start discussions on how the Washington-based financial institution can support the Government’s economic plan.
    Dr van Selm currently serves as the IMF Resident Representative in Jamaica.
    He has been with the IMF since 2000, and has worked on country teams in Europe, Africa and Asia, as well as in the IMF’s Strategy, Policy, and Review Department in Washington, DC, USA.
    Dr van Selm, a self-confessed avid soccer player, holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, and is a prolific author. His book The Economics of Soviet Break-Up is based on his PhD thesis, which was awarded the European Association for


  37. Government announced today that a team from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), led by Bert van Selm, had arrived in Bridgetown on a three-day visit.
    The team will hold discussions with the Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Mia Amor Mottley, Governor of the Central Bank of Barbados, Cleviston Haynes, other senior government officials, and representatives from the private sector and the labour movement.
    It is expected that during this visit the IMF mission will update itself on the current economic and financial situation in Barbados, ahead of discussions with the authorities, over a potential programme in the coming weeks.
    Government also announced that it had appointed White Oak Advisory Ltd. to act as its financial advisor in the context of the debt restructuring process announced on 1 June, 2018.
    The financial advisor is in the process of establishing initial contacts with affected creditors, and is expected to soon commence creditor engagement on the basis of the medium-term macroeconomic projections to be finalized by the Government in the coming weeks. In the meantime, all queries relating to the announced debt restructuring should be directed to the financial advisor using the email address barbados@whiteoakadvisory.com.
    The Government stated that it has held discussions with the rating agencies since last week’s announcement, and it is expecting that Barbados’ credit rating will shortly be adjusted down to Selective Default (SD), as is customary when comprehensive debt restructurings are announced.

    Share this:
    WhatsAppEmail
    Related

    Credit default
    June 5, 2018
    In “A Slider”

    Barbados and IMF to begin negotiations this week
    July 1, 2018
    In “A Slider”

    Dr Bert van Selm to lead IMF delegation to Barbados
    June 3, 2018


  38. John 2

    All you have posted does not take away from my position.Lagarde said that Van selm will be leading an IMF team. The second post says the same thing.

    Now note carefully my point; Van selm passed through Barbados on his way from Jamaica.His official visit with his IMF TEAM is the one that started when mottley was off in Jamaica.Sight?


  39. Published on
    June 16, 2018

    Prime Minister Mia Mottley says discussions with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington have gone well and a team from the international lending institution is due to arrive here early next month to continue talks.
    The Prime Minister, who led a four-member Barbados delegation to Washington Wednesday evening for talks with the IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde, returned to the island early this morning and held a press conference at her Bay Street offices this afternoon.
    Ms Mottley said Barbados is seeking a one per cent interest payment arrangement on any loan from the IMF.
    “I want to make sure that even as we treat to the issue of debt restructuring that no future generation of Barbadians or this current generation, will have to go back to this place again . . . of a government display of utter fiscal recklessness with the manner in which they handled the affairs of the country,” she said.


  40. @ t innnis

    bring me one news article to prove your point

    All you have posted does not take away from my position.Lagarde said that Van selm will be leading an IMF team. The second post says the same thing.
    Now note carefully my point; Van selm passed through Barbados on his way from Jamaica.His official visit with his IMF TEAM is the one that started when mottley was off in Jamaica.Sight?


  41. N.B. Bdos and IMF to begin negotiations this week.Dated Release – 1st july 2018 – last week

    So while this Negotiations is going on – note and not DISCUSSIONS with key stakeholders – The substantive minister of finance was in Jamaica allowing Haitians visa free entry and dealing with skill certificates and lapping out the applause.lol.


  42. there were two meetings by the PM and imf before the one that’s going on now

    Why is Van passing through Barbados on his way from Jamaica?


  43. Van was in Barbados on june 10th and met with the PM and stake holders.

    That was the first part of negotiations .


  44. check the date on my articles


  45. Obviously this was his first meet and greet with Mottley as the new Prime minister.Up until that time she was leader of the opposition and had nothing to give other than her opinions – which I am sure would have been negative.

    Now she is in charge and the IMF has to get a feel of the lay of the land – so to speak.


  46. You are debating a non point. The first meeting was a briefing to set the tone for what is to follow. The high level brief was obviously set in Washington when Mottley and team visitors. What we have happening with the team on the ground is information gathering and the appearance of going through a collaborative approach for optics and fleshing our reports.

    Your tired narrative explains why the DLP is in abeyance six weeks after the general election.


  47. U are WRONGGGGG
    the elections were May 24 th

    The first meeting with Van, IMF team and the PM and her partners was on JUNE 10TH


  48. As a member of the IMF since 1973, they have been conducting Article IV exercises, they are very aware of the lay of the economic land in Barbados.


  49. u don’t not live in the island or don’t keep up with the new

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading